1
|
Wani S, Cote GA, Keswani RN, Yadlapati RH, Hall M, O'Hara J, Berzin TM, Burbridge RA, Chahal P, Cohen J, Coyle WJ, Early D, Guda NM, Inamdar S, Khanna L, Kulkarni A, Rosenkranz L, Sharma N, Shin EJ, Siddiqui UD, Sinha J, Vanderveldt H, Draganov PV. Development of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy standards for training in advanced endoscopy within dedicated advanced endoscopy fellowship programs. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)00186-X. [PMID: 38935016 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Training in interventional endoscopy is offered by nonaccredited advanced endoscopy fellowship programs (AEFPs). The number of these programs has increased dramatically with a concurrent increase in the breadth and complexity of interventional endoscopy procedures. Accreditation is governed by competency-based education, yet what constitutes a "high-quality" nonaccredited AEFP has not been defined. Using an evidence-based consensus process, we aimed to establish standards for AEFPs. METHODS The RAND UCLA appropriateness method, a well-described modified Delphi process to develop quality indicators, was used. A task force established by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy drafted potential quality indicators (structure, process, and outcome) in 6 categories: activity preceding training; structure of AEFPs; training in ERCP, EUS, and EMR; and luminal stent placement. Three rounds of iterative feedback from 20 experts were conducted. Round 0 involved discussion of project details. In round 1, experts independently ranked proposed quality indicators on a 9-point interval scale ranging from highly inappropriate (1) to highly appropriate (9). Next, proposed quality indicators were discussed and reworded in a group meeting followed by round 2, in which experts independently reranked proposed quality indicators and provided benchmarks (when applicable). The median score for each quality indicator was calculated. Mean absolute deviation from the median was calculated, and appropriateness of potential quality indicators was assessed using the BIOMED concerted action on appropriateness definition, P value method, and interpercentile range adjusted for symmetry definition. A quality indicator was deemed appropriate if the median score was ≥7 and met criteria for appropriateness using all 3 defined statistical methods. RESULTS Of 89 proposed quality indicators, 37 statements met criteria as appropriate for a quality indicator (activity preceding training, 2; structure of AEFPs, 10; training in ERCP, 7; training in EUS, 8; training in EMR, 7; luminal stent placement, 3). Minimum thresholds were defined for 19 relevant quality indicators for number of trainers, procedures during fellowship, and procedures before assessment of competence. Among the final appropriate quality indicators were that all trainees should undergo qualitative and quantitative competence assessments using validated tools at least quarterly with documented feedback throughout the training period and that trainees should track outcomes and relevant quality metrics for specific procedures. CONCLUSIONS This consensus process using validated methodology established standards for an AEFP in an effort to ensure adequate training in the most commonly taught interventional endoscopic procedures (ERCP, EUS, EMR, and luminal stent placement) during fellowship. An important component of an AEFP is the use of competency-based assessments that are compliant with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Next Accreditation System, with the goal of ensuring that trainees achieve specific milestones in their progression to achieving cognitive and technical competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Gregory A Cote
- Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Rajesh N Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rena H Yadlapati
- UCSD Center for Esophageal Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Matt Hall
- Children's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas, USA
| | - Jack O'Hara
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Tyler M Berzin
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rebecca A Burbridge
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Prabhleen Chahal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jonathan Cohen
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Walter J Coyle
- Division of Gastroenterology, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Dayna Early
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nalini M Guda
- Aurora St Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Lauren Khanna
- Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Abhijit Kulkarni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura Rosenkranz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Uzma D Siddiqui
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; 20Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jasmine Sinha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Hendrikus Vanderveldt
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bettenworth D, Baker ME, Fletcher JG, Jairath V, Lu C, Bemelman W, d'Haens G, d'Hoore A, Dignass A, Dotan I, Feakins R, Fleshner P, Ha C, Henderson G, Lyu R, Panes J, Rogler G, Mao R, Rimola J, Sandborn WJ, Ng SC, Siegmund B, Silverberg M, Taylor SA, Verstockt B, Gordon IO, Bruining DH, Feagan BG, Rieder F. A global consensus on the definitions, diagnosis and management of fibrostenosing small bowel Crohn's disease in clinical practice. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:10.1038/s41575-024-00935-y. [PMID: 38831007 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-024-00935-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Fibrostenosis of the small bowel is common in patients with Crohn's disease. No consensus recommendations on definition, diagnosis and management in clinical practice are currently available. In this Consensus Statement, we present a clinical practice RAND/UCLA appropriateness study on the definition, diagnosis and clinical management of fibrostenosing Crohn's disease. It was conducted by a panel of 28 global experts and one patient representative. Following a systematic literature review, 526 candidate items grouped into 136 questions were generated and subsequently evaluated for appropriateness. Strictures are best defined as wall thickening, luminal narrowing and prestenotic dilation. Cross-sectional imaging is required for accurate diagnosis of fibrostenosing Crohn's disease, and it is recommended before making treatment decisions. It should also assess the degree of inflammation in the bowel wall. Multiple options for medical anti-inflammatory, endoscopic and surgical therapies were suggested, including follow-up strategies following therapy. This Consensus Statement supports clinical practice through providing guidance on definitions, diagnosis and therapeutic management of patients with fibrostenosing small bowel Crohn's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Bettenworth
- CED Schwerpunktpraxis, Münster, Germany.
- Medical Faculty, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
| | - Mark E Baker
- Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Vipul Jairath
- Alimentiv Inc, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cathy Lu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Willem Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geert d'Haens
- Department of Gastroenterology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Andre d'Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Axel Dignass
- Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Iris Dotan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Roger Feakins
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Phillip Fleshner
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christina Ha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Ruishen Lyu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Julian Panes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gerhard Rogler
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital, Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ren Mao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jordi Rimola
- Inflammatory bowel disease unit, Department of Radiology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Siew C Ng
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Britta Siegmund
- Division of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mark Silverberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ilyssa O Gordon
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David H Bruining
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Brian G Feagan
- Alimentiv Inc, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Florian Rieder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Center for Global Translational Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rubenstein JH, Sawas T, Wani S, Eluri S, Singh S, Chandar AK, Perumpail RB, Inadomi JM, Thrift AP, Piscoya A, Sultan S, Singh S, Katzka D, Davitkov P. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Endoscopic Eradication Therapy of Barrett's Esophagus and Related Neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:1020-1055. [PMID: 38763697 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) can be effective in eradicating BE and related neoplasia and has greater risk of harms and resource use than surveillance endoscopy. This clinical practice guideline aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. METHODS The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients, conducted an evidence review, and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations regarding the use of EET in patients with BE under the following scenarios: presence of (1) high-grade dysplasia, (2) low-grade dysplasia, (3) no dysplasia, and (4) choice of stepwise endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or focal EMR plus ablation, and (5) endoscopic submucosal dissection vs EMR. Clinical recommendations were based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS The panel agreed on 5 recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. Based on the available evidence, the panel made a strong recommendation in favor of EET in patients with BE high-grade dysplasia and conditional recommendation against EET in BE without dysplasia. The panel made a conditional recommendation in favor of EET in BE low-grade dysplasia; patients with BE low-grade dysplasia who place a higher value on the potential harms and lower value on the benefits (which are uncertain) regarding reduction of esophageal cancer mortality could reasonably select surveillance endoscopy. In patients with visible lesions, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of focal EMR plus ablation over stepwise EMR. In patients with visible neoplastic lesions undergoing resection, the use of either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was suggested based on lesion characteristics. CONCLUSIONS This document provides a comprehensive outline of the indications for EET in the management of BE and related neoplasia. Guidance is also provided regarding the considerations surrounding implementation of EET. Providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to guide future research opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel H Rubenstein
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Barrett's Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - Tarek Sawas
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Swathi Eluri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shailendra Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia; Advanced Center for Endoscopy, West Virginia University Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Apoorva K Chandar
- Digestive Health Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - John M Inadomi
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Aaron P Thrift
- Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - David Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Perica Davitkov
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Division of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reddy AT, Lee JP, Leiman DA. Measuring and improving quality in esophageal care and swallowing disorders. Dis Esophagus 2024; 37:doae013. [PMID: 38458618 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doae013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
Evaluating clinical care through quality-related metrics is increasingly common. There are now numerous quality statements and indicators related to the medical management of benign and pre-malignant esophageal diseases. Expert consensus leveraging evidence-based recommendations from published society guidelines has been the most frequently used basis for developing esophageal quality statements. While surgical care of patients with esophageal malignancies, including squamous cell carcinoma, has also been developed, those related to benign esophageal disease now include domains of diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), achalasia, and Barrett's esophagus (BE). Several recent studies evaluating adherence to quality metrics affirm substantial variation in practice patterns with opportunities for improvement in care across esophageal diseases. In particular, patient education regarding treatment options in achalasia, frequency of esophageal biopsies among patients with dysphagia to evaluate for EoE, and endoscopic evaluation within a BE segment are areas identified to have need for improvement. As the management of esophageal diseases becomes more complex and interdisciplinary, adherence to quality metrics may be a source of standardization and improvement in delivery and ultimately patient outcomes. Indeed, the development of national quality databases has resulted in a significant growth in the use of these metrics for quality improvement activities and may form the basis for future inclusion in quality reporting and payment programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua P Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David A Leiman
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porschen R, Langer T, Klug L, Ebert M. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus – Leitlinienreport. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2024; 62:e283-e319. [PMID: 38599577 DOI: 10.1055/a-2240-0374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer Porschen
- Gastroenterologische Praxis am Kreiskrankenhaus Osterholz, Osterholz-Scharmbeck, Germany
| | | | - Lars Klug
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS), Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Ebert
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pokala SK, Williams JL, Holub JL, Calderwood AH, Dominitz JA, Iyer PG, Shaheen NJ, Wani S. Significant Reduction in the Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus and Related Dysplasia During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119:251-261. [PMID: 37782262 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted endoscopy practices, creating unprecedented decreases in cancer screening and surveillance services. We aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic on the proportion of patients diagnosed with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and BE-related dysplasia and adherence to established quality indicators. METHODS Data from all esophagogastroduodenoscopies in the GI Quality Improvement Consortium, a national repository of matched endoscopy and pathology data, were analyzed from January 2018 to December 2022. Four cohorts were created based on procedure date and COVID-19 data: pre-pandemic (January 2018 to February 2020), pandemic-phase I (March 2020 to July 2020), pandemic-phase II (August 2020 to May 2021), and pandemic-phase III (June 2021 to December 2022). Observed and expected number of BE and BE-related dysplasia cases per month and adherence to the Seattle biopsy protocol and recommended surveillance intervals for nondysplastic BE (NDBE) were evaluated. RESULTS Among 2,446,857 esophagogastroduodenoscopies performed during the study period, 104,124 (4.3%) had pathology-confirmed BE. The histologic distribution was 87.4% NDBE, 1.8% low-grade dysplasia, 2.4% indefinite for dysplasia, and 1.4% high-grade dysplasia. The number of monthly BE (-47.9% pandemic-phase I, -21.5% pandemic-phase II, and -19.0% pandemic-phase III) and BE-related dysplasia (high-grade dysplasia: 41.2%, -27.7%, and -19.0%; low-grade dysplasia: 49.1%, -35.3%, and -26.5%; any dysplasia: 46.7%, -32.3%, and -27.9%) diagnoses were significantly reduced during the pandemic phases compared with pre-pandemic data. Adherence rates to the Seattle protocol and recommended surveillance intervals for NDBE did not decline during the pandemic. DISCUSSION There was a significant decline in the number of BE and BE-related dysplasia diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic, with an approximately 50% reduction in the number of cases of dysplasia diagnosed in the early pandemic. The absence of a compensatory increase in diagnoses in the pandemic-phase II and III periods may result in deleterious downstream effects on esophageal adenocarcinoma morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sridevi K Pokala
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jason A Dominitz
- Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System and the University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Triggs JR, Krogh K, Simon V, Krause A, Kaplan JB, Yang GY, Wani S, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino J, Komanduri S. Novel histologic score predicts recurrent intestinal metaplasia after successful endoscopic eradication therapy. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doac078. [PMID: 36446594 PMCID: PMC10150172 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is an effective treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE); however, disease recurrence remains problematic requiring surveillance post-treatment. While data regarding predictors of recurrence are limited, uncontrolled reflux may play a significant role. Our aim was to develop a scoring system based on histopathologic reflux in surveillance biopsies following EET to identify patients at high risk for recurrence of BE. Patients were identified from two centers in the treatment with resection and endoscopic ablation techniques for BE consortium. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides of surveillance biopsies post-EET were assessed for histologic changes associated with reflux from a cohort of patients who also underwent pH-metry (derivation cohort). We developed a novel scoring system (Recurrent Epithelial Changes from Uncontrolled Reflux [RECUR]) composed of dilated intercellular spaces, epithelial ballooning, basal cell hyperplasia, and parakeratosis, to identify patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure. This scoring system was then used to grade surveillance biopsies from patients with or without recurrence of BE following EET (validation cohort). Of 41 patients in the derivation cohort, 19.5% had abnormal acid exposure times (AET) while on proton pump inhibitor therapy. The mean (SD) RECUR score for patients with AET <4% was 4.0 (1.6), compared with 5.5 (0.9) for AET ≥4% (P = 0.015). In the validation cohort consisting of 72 patients without recurrence and 64 patients with recurrence following EET, the RECUR score was the only significant predictor of recurrence (odds ratio: 1.36, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-1.69, P = 0.005). Histologic grading of surveillance biopsies using the RECUR scoring system correlates with BE recurrence following EET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph R Triggs
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katrina Krogh
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Violette Simon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Amanda Krause
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Kaplan
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Guang-Yu Yang
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Peter J Kahrilas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John Pandolfino
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lee HD, Magulick JP, Quiles JG. Multifocal Pyloric Gland Adenoma of the Esophagus Treated by Circumferential Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. ACG Case Rep J 2023; 10:e01039. [PMID: 37143761 PMCID: PMC10153997 DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Pyloric gland adenoma is a rare neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract typically observed in the stomach with a substantial malignant potential warranting its resection. While isolated esophageal pyloric gland adenoma has been reported, there is no literature on the encounter of diffuse, multifocal esophageal pyloric gland adenoma or its management. We present a unique case of multifocal pyloric gland adenoma of the esophagus treated by circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection. We demonstrate endoscopic submucosal dissection to be a feasible management option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard D. Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium (SAUSHEC), Fort Sam Houston, TX
| | - John P. Magulick
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium (SAUSHEC), Fort Sam Houston, TX
| | - John G. Quiles
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium (SAUSHEC), Fort Sam Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thaker AM, Phan J, Ge PS, Muthusamy VR. Driving Quality in Advanced Endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2675-2679.e2. [PMID: 35931350 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Adarsh M Thaker
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer Phan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Keck Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Phillip S Ge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Muthusamy VR, Wani S, Gyawali CP, Komanduri S. AGA Clinical Practice Update on New Technology and Innovation for Surveillance and Screening in Barrett's Esophagus: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2696-2706.e1. [PMID: 35788412 PMCID: PMC10203866 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
DESCRIPTION The purpose of this best practice advice (BPA) article from the Clinical Practice Update Committee of the American Gastroenterological Association is to provide an update on advances and innovation regarding the screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus. METHODS The BPA statements presented here were developed from expert review of existing literature combined with discussion and expert opinion to provide practical advice. Formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of BPAs was not the intent of this clinical practice update. This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee (CPUC) and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPUC and external peer review through standard procedures of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Screening with standard upper endoscopy may be considered in individuals with at least 3 established risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma, including individuals who are male, non-Hispanic white, age >50 years, have a history of smoking, chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, or a family history of BE or esophageal adenocarcinoma. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Nonendoscopic cell-collection devices may be considered as an option to screen for BE. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Screening and surveillance endoscopic examination should be performed using high-definition white light endoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy, with endoscopists spending adequate time inspecting the Barrett's segment. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Screening and surveillance exams should define the extent of BE using a standardized grading system documenting the circumferential and maximal extent of the columnar lined esophagus (Prague classification) with a clear description of landmarks and the location and characteristics of visible lesions (nodularity, ulceration), when present. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Advanced imaging technologies such as endomicroscopy may be used as adjunctive techniques to identify dysplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Sampling during screening and surveillance exams should be performed using the Seattle biopsy protocol (4-quadrant biopsies every 1-2 cm and target biopsies from any visible lesion). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Wide-area transepithelial sampling may be used as an adjunctive technique to sample the suspected or established Barrett's segment (in addition to the Seattle biopsy protocol). BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Patients with erosive esophagitis should be biopsied when concern of dysplasia or malignancy exists. A repeat endoscopy should be performed after 8 weeks of twice a day proton pump inhibitor therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Tissue systems pathology-based prediction assay may be utilized for risk stratification of patients with nondysplastic BE. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Risk stratification models may be utilized to selectively identify individuals at risk for Barrett's associated neoplasia. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Given the significant interobserver variability among pathologists, the diagnosis of BE-related neoplasia should be confirmed by an expert pathology review. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Patients with BE-related neoplasia should be referred to endoscopists with expertise in advanced imaging, resection, and ablation. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: All patients with BE should be placed on at least daily proton pump inhibitor therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 14: Patients with nondysplastic BE should undergo surveillance endoscopy in 3 to 5 years. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 15: In patients undergoing surveillance after endoscopic eradication therapy, random biopsies should be taken of the esophagogastric junction, gastric cardia, and the distal 2 cm of the neosquamous epithelium as well as from all visible lesions, independent of the length of the original BE segment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aceves SS, Alexander JA, Baron TH, Bredenoord AJ, Day L, Dellon ES, Falk GW, Furuta GT, Gonsalves N, Hirano I, Konda VJA, Lucendo AJ, Moawad F, Peterson KA, Putnam PE, Richter J, Schoepfer AM, Straumann A, McBride DL, Sharma P, Katzka DA. Endoscopic approach to eosinophilic esophagitis: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Consensus Conference. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:576-592.e1. [PMID: 35965102 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopy plays a critical role in caring for and evaluating the patient with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Endoscopy is essential for diagnosis, assessment of response to therapy, treatment of esophageal strictures, and ongoing monitoring of patients in histologic remission. To date, less-invasive testing for identifying or grading EoE severity has not been established, whereas diagnostic endoscopy as integral to both remains the criterion standard. Therapeutic endoscopy in patients with adverse events of EoE may also be required. In particular, dilation may be essential to treat and attenuate progression of the disease in select patients to minimize further fibrosis and stricture formation. Using a modified Delphi consensus process, a group of 20 expert clinicians and investigators in EoE were assembled to provide guidance for the use of endoscopy in EoE. Through an iterative process, the group achieved consensus on 20 statements yielding comprehensive advice on tissue-sampling standards, gross assessment of disease activity, use and performance of endoscopic dilation, and monitoring of disease, despite an absence of high-quality evidence. Key areas of controversy were identified when discussions yielded an inability to reach agreement on the merit of a statement. We expect that with ongoing research, higher-quality evidence will be obtained to enable creation of a guideline for these issues. We further anticipate that forthcoming expert-generated and agreed-on statements will provide valuable practice advice on the role and use of endoscopy in patients with EoE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seema S Aceves
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of California San Diego and Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Alexander
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Todd H Baron
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Arjan J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lukejohn Day
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Evan S Dellon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Gary W Falk
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Glenn T Furuta
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program and Mucosal Inflammation Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Digestive Health Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Nirmala Gonsalves
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ikuo Hirano
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Alfredo J Lucendo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Tomelloso, Tomelloso, Spain
| | - Fouad Moawad
- Scripps Health Uniformed Services, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Kathryn A Peterson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Philip E Putnam
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Joel Richter
- University of South Florida Health, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Alain M Schoepfer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausannel, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alex Straumann
- Facharzt FMH fur Gastroenterologie u Innere Medizin, Olten, Switzerland
| | | | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wani S. Personalized Approach to the Post-Endoscopic Eradication Therapy Barrett's Esophagus Patient. Gastroenterology 2022; 163:39-42. [PMID: 35526573 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Endoscopic Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:1469-1479. [PMID: 35226224 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07395-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
|
14
|
Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus: An Updated ACG Guideline. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:559-587. [PMID: 35354777 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a common condition associated with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. BE is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, a highly lethal cancer with an increasing incidence over the last 5 decades. These revised guidelines implement Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to propose recommendations for the definition and diagnosis of BE, screening for BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma, surveillance of patients with known BE, and the medical and endoscopic treatment of BE and its associated early neoplasia. Important changes since the previous iteration of this guideline include a broadening of acceptable screening modalities for BE to include nonendoscopic methods, liberalized intervals for surveillance of short-segment BE, and volume criteria for endoscopic therapy centers for BE. We recommend endoscopic eradication therapy for patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia and those with BE and low-grade dysplasia. We propose structured surveillance intervals for patients with dysplastic BE after successful ablation based on the baseline degree of dysplasia. We could not make recommendations regarding chemoprevention or use of biomarkers in routine practice due to insufficient data.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hall M, Bergman J, Canto MI, Chak A, Corley DA, Falk GW, Fitzgerald RC, Haidry R, Inadomi JM, Iyer PG, Kolb J, Komanduri S, Konda V, Montgomery EA, Muthusamy VR, Rubenstein JH, Schnoll-Sussman F, Shaheen NJ, Smith M, Spechler S, Vajravelu R. Post-endoscopy Esophageal Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: Consensus Statements From an International Expert Panel. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:366-372. [PMID: 34655571 PMCID: PMC8792371 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.09.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Hall
- Children’s Hospital Association, Leawood, Kansas
| | - Jacques Bergman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcia I. Canto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amitabh Chak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Douglas A. Corley
- The Permanente Medical Group; Kaiser Permanente, Northern California
| | - Gary W. Falk
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rebecca C. Fitzgerald
- MRC Cancer Unit, Hutchison-MRC Research Center, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rehan Haidry
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - John M. Inadomi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Prasad G. Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jennifer Kolb
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Vani Konda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center and Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - V. Raman Muthusamy
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joel H. Rubenstein
- Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, LTC Charles S. Kettles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor,Michigan Barrett’s Esophagus Program, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Felice Schnoll-Sussman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Nicholas J. Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Michael Smith
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mount Sinai West and Mount Sinai Morningside Hospitals, New York, New York
| | - Stuart Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor University Medical Center and Baylor Scott and White Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ravy Vajravelu
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ruiz de León San Juan A, Pérez de la Serna Bueno J, Sevilla Mantilla MC, Esteban López-Jamar JM, Sánchez Pernaute A. Gastro-esophageal reflux disease: limits of medical treatment and surgical indications. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2021; 113:356-363. [PMID: 33393330 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2020.7648/2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) have long been considered as the ideal treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and their limitations and side effects have revealed a need for new therapeutic approaches. At present, the therapeutic gains achieved are relatively small or limited to groups of patients with specific characteristics. This article updates the contributions, indications, and limitations of pharmacological, endoscopic, and surgical treatment.
Collapse
|
17
|
McGoran JJ, Ragunath K. Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: Western perspective of current status and future prospects. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:720-729. [PMID: 32790886 DOI: 10.1111/den.13812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma and current practice is to establish endoscopic surveillance once diagnosed, in order to identify early dysplasia and neoplasia that has the potential to undergo endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Before embarking upon EET the clinical team has a duty to consider all viable options and come to a plan based on recent evidence. The therapeutic approach varies greatly but largely adheres to the mantra of 'Detect-Resect-Ablate', in which high-quality endoscopy identifies BE associated pathology, associated lesions (if present) undergo safe endoscopic resection and remaining intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus is ablated to prevent recurrence of dysplasia. In this review, current practice, pitfalls, complications, and the future perspectives on practice in this field are discussed. The Western perspective is focused on here, with an outline of the differences in clinical practice with Asian nations and attempts to bridge these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J McGoran
- Department of Digestive Diseases, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Krish Ragunath
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.,Curtin University Medical School, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jones B, Williams JL, Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR, Shaheen NJ, Wani S. Racial Disparities in Adherence to Quality Indicators in Barrett's Esophagus: An Analysis Using the GIQuIC National Benchmarking Registry. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:1201-1210. [PMID: 33767105 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Racial disparities in outcomes in esophageal adenocarcinoma are well established. Using a nationwide registry, we aimed to compare clinical and endoscopic characteristics of blacks and whites with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and adherence to defined quality indicators. METHODS We analyzed data from the Gastrointestinal Quality Improvement Consortium Registry between January 2012 and December 2019. Patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with an indication of BE screening or surveillance, or an endoscopic finding of BE, were included. Adherence to recommended endoscopic surveillance intervals of 3-5 years for nondysplastic BE and adherence to Seattle biopsy protocol were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to assess variables associated with adherence. RESULTS A total of 100,848 esophagogastroduodenoscopies in 84,789 patients met inclusion criteria (blacks-3,957 and whites-96,891). Blacks were less likely to have histologically confirmed BE (34.3% vs 51.7%, P < 0.01), had shorter BE lengths (1.61 vs 2.35 cm, P < 0.01), and were less likely to have any dysplasia (4.3% vs 7.1%, P < 0.01). Although whites were predominantly male (62.2%), about half of blacks with BE were female (53.0%). Blacks with nondysplastic BE were less likely to be recommended appropriate surveillance intervals (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.68-0.89). Adherence rates to the Seattle protocol were modestly higher among blacks overall (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.20), although significantly lower among blacks with BE segments >6 cm. DISCUSSION The use of sex as a risk factor for BE screening may be inappropriate among blacks. Fewer blacks were recommended appropriate surveillance intervals, and blacks with longer segment BE were less likely to undergo Seattle biopsy protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake Jones
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Endoscopic Eradication Therapy for Barrett's Neoplasia: Where Do We Stand a Decade Later? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2020; 22:61. [PMID: 33277663 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-020-00799-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a cancer associated with increasing incidence and poor survival. Early identification and effective treatment of BE-related neoplasia prior to the development of invasive adenocarcinoma are essential to limiting the morbidity and mortality associated with this cancer. In this review, we summarized the recent evidence guiding endoscopic eradication therapies (EET) for neoplastic BE. RECENT FINDINGS New sampling technologies and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) systems have potential to revolutionize early neoplasia detection in BE. EET for BE are safe and effective in achieving complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) and reducing the progression to EAC, a practice endorsed by all GI society guidelines. EET should be considered in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD), intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), and select cases with low-grade dysplasia (LGD). The increasing use of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the West may allow EET of select cases with submucosal EAC. Post-EET surveillance strategies will continue to evolve as knowledge of specific risk factors and long-term neoplasia recurrence rates improve. In the last decade, major advancements in EET for neoplastic BE have been achieved. These now represent the standard of care in the management of BE-related dysplasia and intramucosal cancer.
Collapse
|
20
|
Wani S, Han S, Kushnir V, Early D, Mullady D, Hammad H, Brauer B, Thaker A, Simon V, Ezekwe E, Hollander T, Wood M, Rastogi A, Edmundowicz S, Muthusamy VR, Komanduri S. Recurrence Is Rare Following Complete Eradication of Intestinal Metaplasia in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus and Peaks at 18 Months. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:2609-2617.e2. [PMID: 31982610 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS There have been few studies describing the long-term durability of complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia who received endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Data are needed to guide surveillance interval protocols and identify patients at risk for recurrence. We assessed the rate of recurrence of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia, histologic features, and outcomes after recurrence of CE-IM, and identified factors associated with recurrence. METHODS We performed a prospective study of 807 patients with BE who underwent EET, which produced CE-IM, at 4 tertiary-care referral centers, from January 2013 to October 2018. Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative incidence rates (IR) of recurrence were calculated for up to 5 years following CE-IM and were stratified by baseline level of histology. Density estimates of recurrence were used to determine the change in the rate of recurrence over time. We conducted logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with recurrence. RESULTS Intestinal metaplasia recurred in 121 patients (15%; IR, 5.2/100 person-years), and dysplasia recurred in 41 patients (5.1%; IR, 1.8/100 person-years), after a median follow-up time of 2317 person-years. The rate of recurrence was not constant and the time to any recurrence converged to a normal distribution; recurrences peaked at 1.6 y after patients had CE-IM. Baseline high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal cancer (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.19), presence of reflux symptoms (aOR, 12.1) or hiatal hernia (aOR, 13.8), and number of sessions required to achieve CE-IM (aOR, 1.8) were associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In a prospective study of a large cohort of patients with BE undergoing EET, we found a low rate of recurrence after CE-IM. The rate of recurrence peaked at 1-2 y after CE-IM. These findings indicate that aggressive surveillance might not be necessary more than 1 y after CE-IM and should be considered in surveillance guidelines. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT02634645.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - Samuel Han
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Vladimir Kushnir
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Dayna Early
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Daniel Mullady
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Hazem Hammad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Brian Brauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Adarsh Thaker
- Vatche and Tamar Maoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Violette Simon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Eze Ezekwe
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Thomas Hollander
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Mariah Wood
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Steven Edmundowicz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Maoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Trindade AJ. How Much Post-Ablation Surveillance Is Too Much for Patients With Barrett's Esophagus? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:2435-2436. [PMID: 32200084 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arvind J Trindade
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health System, New Hyde Park, New York
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wani S, Gyawali CP, Katzka DA. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Reducing Rates of Post-Endoscopy Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Commentary. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:1533-1537. [PMID: 32679219 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| | - C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - David A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lipman G, Markar S, Gupta A, Haidry RJ, Lovat LB, Banks M, Sehgal V, Graham D, Sweis R, Morris D, Miah H, Dunn JM, Smart HL, Bhandari P, Smith L, Willert R, Fullarton G, Morris J, Di Pietro M, Gordon C, Penman I, Barr H, Patel P, Boger P, Kapoor N, Hoare J, Direkze N, Ang Y, Veitch A, Ragunath K, Cheong E, Dhar A, Nylander D, Mahon B, Narayanasamy R, O’Toole D. Learning curves and the influence of procedural volume for the treatment of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:543-550.e1. [PMID: 32145288 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic resections and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are the established treatments for Barrett's-associated dysplasia and early esophageal neoplasia. The UK RFA Registry collects patient outcomes from 24 centers treating patients in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Learning curves for treatment of Barrett's dysplasia and the impact of center caseload on patient outcomes is still unknown. METHODS We examined outcomes of 678 patients treated with RFA in the UK Registry using risk-adjusted cumulative sum control chart (RA-CUSUM) analysis to identify change points in complete resolution of intestinal metaplasia (CR-IM) and complete resolution of dysplasia (CR-D) outcomes. We compared outcomes between those treated at high-volume (>100 enrolled patients), medium-volume (51-100), and low-volume (<50) centers. RESULTS There was no association between center volume and CR-IM and CR-D rates, but recurrence rates were lower in high-volume versus low-volume centers (log rank P = .001). There was a significant change point for outcomes at 12 cases for CR-D (reduction from 24.5% to 10.4%; P < .001) and at 18 cases for CR-IM (30.7% to 18.6%; P < .001) from RA-CUSUM curve analysis. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that 18 supervised cases of endoscopic ablation may be required before competency in endoscopic treatment of Barrett's dysplasia can be achieved. The difference in outcomes between a high-volume and low-volume center does not support further centralization of services to only high-volume centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gideon Lipman
- Research Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sheraz Markar
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Abhinav Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rehan J Haidry
- Research Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Laurence B Lovat
- Research Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Gastroenterology, University College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bonavina L, Fisichella PM, Gavini S, Lee YY, Tatum RP. Clinical course of gastroesophageal reflux disease and impact of treatment in symptomatic young patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2020; 1481:117-126. [PMID: 32266986 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.14350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In symptomatic young patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, early identification of progressive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is critical to prevent long-term complications associated with hiatal hernia, increased esophageal acid and nonacid exposure, release of proinflammatory cytokines, and development of intestinal metaplasia, endoscopically visible Barrett's esophagus, and dysplasia leading to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Progression of GERD may occur in asymptomatic patients and in those under continuous acid-suppressive medication. The long-term side effects of proton-pump inhibitors, chemopreventive agents, and radiofrequency ablation are contentious. In patients with early-stage disease, when the lower esophageal sphincter function is still preserved and before endoscopically visible Barrett's esophagus develops, novel laparoscopic procedures, such as magnetic and electric sphincter augmentation, may have a greater role than conventional surgical therapy. A multidisciplinary approach to GERD by a dedicated team of gastroenterologists and surgeons might impact the patients' lifestyle, the therapeutic choices, and the course of the disease. Biological markers are needed to precisely assess the risk of disease progression and to tailor surveillance, ablation, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General and Foregut Surgery, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milano, Italy
| | - P Marco Fisichella
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberge School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sravanya Gavini
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.,Gut Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.,St George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Roger P Tatum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine and VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wani S, Williams JL, Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR, Shaheen NJ. Time Trends in Adherence to Surveillance Intervals and Biopsy Protocol Among Patients With Barrett's Esophagus. Gastroenterology 2020; 158:770-772.e2. [PMID: 31622626 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado.
| | | | - Srinadh Komanduri
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Soroush A, Poneros JM, Lightdale CJ, Abrams JA. Shorter time to achieve endoscopic eradication is not associated with improved long-term outcomes in Barrett's esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5475051. [PMID: 30997483 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Quality indicators have been proposed for endoscopic eradication therapy of Barrett's esophagus (BE). One such measure suggests that complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) should be achieved within 18 months of starting treatment. The aim of this study was to assess whether achievement of CE-IM within 18 months is associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of BE patients who underwent endoscopic eradication. Time to CE-IM was recorded and categorized as ≤ or > 18 months. The main outcome measures were recurrence of IM and of dysplasia after CE-IM, defined as a single endoscopy without endoscopic evidence of BE or histologic evidence of intestinal metaplasia. Recurrence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. A total of 290 patients were included in the analyses. The baseline histology was high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in 74.2% of patients. CE-IM was achieved in 85.5% of patients, and 54.1% of the cohort achieved CE-IM within 18 months. Achieving CE-IM within 18 months was not associated with reduced risk of recurrence of IM or dysplasia in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. In this cohort, older age and increased BE length were associated with IM recurrence, and increased hiatal hernia size was associated with dysplasia recurrence. Compared to longer times, achieving CE-IM within 18 months was not associated with a reduced risk of recurrence of IM or dysplasia. Alternative evidence-based quality metrics for endoscopic eradication therapy should be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Soroush
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - John M Poneros
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Julian A Abrams
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Peerally MF, Bhandari P, Ragunath K, Barr H, Stokes C, Haidry R, Lovat L, Smart H, Harrison R, Smith K, Morris T, de Caestecker JS. Radiofrequency ablation compared with argon plasma coagulation after endoscopic resection of high-grade dysplasia or stage T1 adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a randomized pilot study (BRIDE). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:680-689. [PMID: 30076843 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic resection (ER) is safe and effective for Barrett's esophagus (BE) containing high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or mucosal adenocarcinoma (T1A). The risk of metachronous neoplasia is reduced by ablation of residual BE by using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or argon plasma coagulation (APC). These have not been compared directly. We aimed to recruit up to 100 patients with BE and HGD or T1A confirmed by ER over 1 year in 6 centers in a randomized pilot study. METHODS Randomization was 1:1 to RFA or APC (4 treatments allowed at 2-month intervals). Recruitment, retention, dysplasia clearance, clearance of benign BE, adverse events, healthcare costs, and quality of life by using EQ-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30, or OES18 were assessed up to the end of the trial at 12 months. RESULTS Of 171 patients screened, 76 were randomized to RFA (n = 36) or APC (n = 40). The mean age was 69.7 years, and 82% were male. BE was <5 cm (n = 27), 5 to 10 cm (n = 45), and >10 cm (n = 4). Sixty-five patients completed the trial. At 12 months, dysplasia clearance was RFA 79.4% and APC 83.8% (odds ratio [OR] 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-2.6); BE clearance was RFA 55.8%, and APC 48.3% (OR 1.4; 95% CI, 0.5-3.6). A total of 6.1% (RFA) and 13.3% (APC) had buried BE glands. Adverse events (including stricture rate after starting RFA 3/36 [8.3%] and APC 3/37 [8.1%]) and quality of life scores were similar, but RFA cost $27491 more per case than APC. CONCLUSION This pilot study suggests similar efficacy and safety but a cost difference favoring APC. A fully powered non-inferiority trial is appropriate to confirm these findings. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01733719.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Farhad Peerally
- Digestive Diseases Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK and Leicester Cancer Research Centre, College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Krish Ragunath
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham and NIHR Nottingham BRC, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Hugh Barr
- Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Clive Stokes
- Gloucester Royal Hospital, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Rehan Haidry
- University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Howard Smart
- Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Harrison
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Smith
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Morris
- Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - John S de Caestecker
- Digestive Diseases Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK and Leicester Cancer Research Centre, College of Medicine, Biological Sciences and Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Machicado JD, Han S, Yadlapati RH, Simon VC, Qumseya BJ, Sultan S, Kushnir VM, Komanduri S, Rastogi A, Muthusamy VR, Haidry R, Ragunath K, Singh R, Hammad HT, Shaheen NJ, Wani S. A Survey of Expert Practice and Attitudes Regarding Advanced Imaging Modalities in Surveillance of Barrett's Esophagus. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63:3262-3271. [PMID: 30178283 PMCID: PMC6541486 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5257-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Published guidelines do not address what the minimum incremental diagnostic yield (IDY) for detection of dysplasia/cancer is required over the standard Seattle protocol for an advanced imaging modality (AIM) to be implemented in routine surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) patients. We aimed to report expert practice patterns and attitudes, specifically addressing the minimum IDY in the use of AIMs in BE surveillance. METHODS An international group of BE experts completed an anonymous electronic survey of domains relevant to surveillance practice patterns and use of AIMs. The evaluated AIMs were conventional chromoendoscopy (CC), virtual chromoendoscopy (VC), volumetric laser endomicroscopy (VLE), confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), and wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS3D). Responses were recorded using five-point balanced Likert items and analyzed as continuous variables. RESULTS The survey response rate was 84% (61/73)-41 US and 20 non-US. Experts were most comfortable with and routinely use VC and CC, and least comfortable with and rarely use VLE, CLE, and WATS3D. Experts rated data from randomized controlled trials (1.4 ± 0.9) and guidelines (2.6 ± 1.2) as the two most influential factors for implementing AIMs in clinical practice. The minimum IDY of AIMs over standard biopsies to be considered of clinical benefit was lowest for VC (15%, IQR 10-29%) and highest for VLE (30%, IQR 20-50%). Compared to US experts, non-US experts reported higher use of CC for BE surveillance (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION These results should inform benchmarks that need to be met for guidelines to recommend the routine use of AIMs in the surveillance of BE patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge D. Machicado
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Mail Stop F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Samuel Han
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Mail Stop F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Rena H. Yadlapati
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Mail Stop F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Violette C. Simon
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Mail Stop F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Amit Rastogi
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Hazem T. Hammad
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Mail Stop F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | | | - Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Mail Stop F735, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nagami Y, Ominami M, Otani K, Hosomi S, Tanaka F, Taira K, Kamata N, Yamagami H, Tanigawa T, Shiba M, Watanabe T, Fujiwara Y. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagogastric Junction. Digestion 2018; 97:38-44. [PMID: 29393168 DOI: 10.1159/000484111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is uncommon in Eastern countries, including Japan, but it is believed that the incidence of EGJ adenocarcinoma will increase in Asia in the future due to the decreasing incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive and curative treatment that allows precise pathological assessment. SUMMARY Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging may be useful for differential diagnoses and for delineating the cancer margin of EGJ adenocarcinoma, but subsquamous carcinoma extension, which is the invasion of EGJ adenocarcinoma beneath the normal esophageal squamous epithelium, makes it difficult to detect cancer margins of the oral side in ESD for EGJ adenocarcinoma. Since subsquamous carcinoma extension was reported to be less than 1 cm in most cases, the oral safety margin that is placed 1 cm from the squamocolumnar junction is useful for negative cancerous horizontal margin. A multicenter retrospective study of esophageal adenocarcinoma including EGJ adenocarcinoma showed that mucosal and submucosal cancer within 500 μm from the muscularis mucosa without lymphovascular involvement, a poorly differentiated component, and lesion size over 3 cm were not associated with metastasis. Several retrospective studies about ESD for EGJ adenocarcinoma have suggested feasible short-term and long-term outcomes using curative criteria based on gastric cancer guidelines. Key Messages: ESD would be a good first-line treatment for superficial EGJ adenocarcinoma, including Barrett's adenocarcinoma. Additional information about the incidence of metastasis would help confirm the indication of ESD for EGJ adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
|
30
|
Han S, Yadlapati R, Simon V, Ezekwe E, Early DS, Kushnir V, Hollander T, Brauer BC, Hammad H, Edmundowicz SA, Wood M, Shaheen NJ, Muthusamy RV, Komanduri S, Wani S. Dysplasia severity is associated with poor quality of life in patients with Barrett's esophagus referred for endoscopic eradication therapy. Dis Esophagus 2018; 32:5085984. [PMID: 30169612 PMCID: PMC6303730 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Limited data exist regarding patient-reported outcomes and quality of life (QOL) experienced by patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) referred for endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Specifically, the impact of grade of dysplasia has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to measure patient-reported symptoms and QOL and identify factors associated with poor QOL in BE patients referred for EET. This was a prospective multicenter study conducted from January 2015 to October 2017, which included patients with BE referred for EET. Participants completed a set of validated questionnaires to measure QOL, symptom severity, and psychosocial factors. The primary outcome was poor QOL defined by a PROMIS score >12. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with poor QOL. In total, 193 patients participated (mean age 64.6 years, BE length 5.5 cm, 82% males, 92% Caucasians) with poor QOL reported in 104 (53.9%) participants. On univariate analysis, patients with poor QOL had lower use of twice daily proton pump inhibitor use (61.5% vs. 86.5%, P = 0.03), shorter disease duration (4.9 vs. 5.9 years, P = 0.04) and progressive increase in grade of dysplasia (high-grade dysplasia: 68.8% vs. 31.3%, esophageal adenocarcinoma: 75.5% vs. 24.5%, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high-grade dysplasia was independently associated with poor QOL (OR: 5.57, 95% CI: 1.05, 29.5, P = 0.04). In summary, poor QOL is experienced by the majority of patients with BE referred for EET and the degree of dysplasia was independently associated with poor QOL, which emphasizes the need to incorporate patient-centered outcomes when studying treatment of BE-related dysplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Han
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - R Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - V Simon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - E Ezekwe
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - D S Early
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - V Kushnir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - T Hollander
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - B C Brauer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - H Hammad
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - S A Edmundowicz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - M Wood
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - N J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - R V Muthusamy
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - S Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - S Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, Colorado,Address correspondence to: Sachin Wani, Associate Professor of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, 1635 Aurora Court, Rm 2.031, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Han S, Wani S. Quality Indicators in Barrett's Esophagus: Time to Change the Status Quo. Clin Endosc 2018; 51:344-351. [PMID: 30078308 PMCID: PMC6078931 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2018.099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The push for high quality care in all fields of medicine highlights the importance of establishing and adhering to quality indicators.In response, several gastrointestinal societies have established quality indicators specific to Barrett's esophagus, which serve to createthresholds for performance while standardizing practice and guiding value-based care. Recent studies, however, have consistentlydemonstrated the lack of adherence to these quality indicators, particularly in surveillance (appropriate utilization of endoscopy andobtaining biopsies using the Seattle protocol) and endoscopic eradication therapy practices. These findings suggest that innovativeinterventions are needed to address these shortcomings in order to deliver high quality care to patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Han
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Komanduri S, Muthusamy VR, Wani S. Controversies in Endoscopic Eradication Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:1861-1875.e1. [PMID: 29458152 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 11/05/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Advances in endoscopic eradication therapy for Barrett's Esophagus-associated neoplasia have resulted in a significant paradigm shift in the diagnosis and management of this complex disease. A robust body of literature critically evaluating outcomes of resection and ablative strategies has allowed gastroenterologists to make quality, evidence-based decisions for their patients. Despite this progress, there are still many unanswered questions and challenges that remain. Ultimately, identification of a cost-effective screening modality, biomarkers for risk stratification, and strides to eliminate post surveillance endoscopy after endoscopic eradication therapy are essential to reach our long-term goal for eradication of esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinadh Komanduri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Management of low-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: Ablate or survey? TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2018.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
34
|
Wani S, Qumseya B, Sultan S, Agrawal D, Chandrasekhara V, Harnke B, Kothari S, McCarter M, Shaukat A, Wang A, Yang J, Dewitt J. Endoscopic eradication therapy for patients with Barrett's esophagus-associated dysplasia and intramucosal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:907-931.e9. [PMID: 29397943 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|