1
|
Mehta SB, Banerji S, Crins L, Opdam N, Loomans BAC. The longevity of tooth-coloUred materials used for restoration of tooth wear: an evidence-based approach. Prim Dent J 2023; 12:43-53. [PMID: 37705477 DOI: 10.1177/20501684231193595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
Patients with tooth wear are commonly encountered in general dental practice. When indicated, restorative rehabilitation is often accompanied by a request from the patient for an aesthetic, tooth-coloured outcome. This article seeks to provide an evidence-based approach, focussing on the longevity of the materials which can be used for the restorative treatment of tooth wear, as well as their modes of failure and observed performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamir B Mehta
- Shamir B. Mehta BDS, BSc MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD Dip. FFGDP(UK), FCGDent, FDSRCS(Eng), FDSRCPS(Glas), FDFTEd Professor of Aesthetic Dentistry, College of Medicine and Dentistry/Ulster University; Visiting Professor Radboud University Medical Centre; Senior Clinical Teacher, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK
- Subir Banerji BDS, MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD, FDS, RCPS(Glasg), FCGDent, FICD Programme Director MSc Aesthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Luuk Crins DDS PhD candidate, Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Niek Opdam DDS, PhD Associate Professor in Restorative Dentistry and Cariology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Bas A. C. Loomans DDS, PhD Professor in Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Subir Banerji
- Shamir B. Mehta BDS, BSc MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD Dip. FFGDP(UK), FCGDent, FDSRCS(Eng), FDSRCPS(Glas), FDFTEd Professor of Aesthetic Dentistry, College of Medicine and Dentistry/Ulster University; Visiting Professor Radboud University Medical Centre; Senior Clinical Teacher, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK
- Subir Banerji BDS, MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD, FDS, RCPS(Glasg), FCGDent, FICD Programme Director MSc Aesthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Luuk Crins DDS PhD candidate, Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Niek Opdam DDS, PhD Associate Professor in Restorative Dentistry and Cariology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Bas A. C. Loomans DDS, PhD Professor in Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Luuk Crins
- Shamir B. Mehta BDS, BSc MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD Dip. FFGDP(UK), FCGDent, FDSRCS(Eng), FDSRCPS(Glas), FDFTEd Professor of Aesthetic Dentistry, College of Medicine and Dentistry/Ulster University; Visiting Professor Radboud University Medical Centre; Senior Clinical Teacher, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK
- Subir Banerji BDS, MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD, FDS, RCPS(Glasg), FCGDent, FICD Programme Director MSc Aesthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Luuk Crins DDS PhD candidate, Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Niek Opdam DDS, PhD Associate Professor in Restorative Dentistry and Cariology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Bas A. C. Loomans DDS, PhD Professor in Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Niek Opdam
- Shamir B. Mehta BDS, BSc MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD Dip. FFGDP(UK), FCGDent, FDSRCS(Eng), FDSRCPS(Glas), FDFTEd Professor of Aesthetic Dentistry, College of Medicine and Dentistry/Ulster University; Visiting Professor Radboud University Medical Centre; Senior Clinical Teacher, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK
- Subir Banerji BDS, MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD, FDS, RCPS(Glasg), FCGDent, FICD Programme Director MSc Aesthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Luuk Crins DDS PhD candidate, Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Niek Opdam DDS, PhD Associate Professor in Restorative Dentistry and Cariology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Bas A. C. Loomans DDS, PhD Professor in Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas A C Loomans
- Shamir B. Mehta BDS, BSc MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD Dip. FFGDP(UK), FCGDent, FDSRCS(Eng), FDSRCPS(Glas), FDFTEd Professor of Aesthetic Dentistry, College of Medicine and Dentistry/Ulster University; Visiting Professor Radboud University Medical Centre; Senior Clinical Teacher, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK
- Subir Banerji BDS, MClinDent (Prosthodontics), PhD, FDS, RCPS(Glasg), FCGDent, FICD Programme Director MSc Aesthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Melbourne Dental School, The University of Melbourne, Australia
- Luuk Crins DDS PhD candidate, Department of Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Niek Opdam DDS, PhD Associate Professor in Restorative Dentistry and Cariology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Bas A. C. Loomans DDS, PhD Professor in Oral Function and Restorative Dentistry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Afrashtehfar KI, Emami E, Ahmadi M, Eilayyan O, Abi-Nader S, Tamimi F. Failure rate of single-unit restorations on posterior vital teeth: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2016; 117:345-353.e8. [PMID: 27765400 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2016] [Revised: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM No knowledge synthesis exists concerning when to use a direct restoration versus a complete-coverage indirect restoration in posterior vital teeth. PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the failure rate of conventional single-unit tooth-supported restorations in posterior permanent vital teeth as a function of remaining tooth structure. MATERIAL AND METHODS Four databases were searched electronically, and 8 selected journals were searched manually up to February 2015. Clinical studies of tooth-supported single-unit restorative treatments with a mean follow-up period of at least 3 years were selected. The outcome measured was the restorations' clinical or radiological failure. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, the Cochrane Collaboration procedures for randomized control trials, the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology criteria for observational studies, 2 reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the evidence of the included studies using the American Association of Critical Care Nurses' system. The weighted-mean group 5-year failure rates of the restorations were reported according to the type of treatment and remaining tooth structure. A metaregression model was used to assess the correlation between the number of remaining tooth walls and the weighted-mean 5-year failure rates. RESULTS Five randomized controlled trials and 9 observational studies were included and their quality ranged from low to moderate. These studies included a total of 358 crowns, 4804 composite resins, and 303582 amalgams. Data obtained from the randomized controlled trials showed that, regardless of the amount of remaining tooth structure, amalgams presented better outcomes than composite resins. Furthermore, in teeth with fewer than 2 remaining walls, high-quality observational studies demonstrated that crowns were better than amalgams. A clear inverse correlation was found between the amount of remaining tooth structure and restoration failure. CONCLUSIONS Insufficient high-quality data are available to support one restorative treatment or material over another for the restoration of vital posterior teeth. However, the current evidence suggests that the failure rates of treatments may depend on the amount of remaining tooth structure and types of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelvin I Afrashtehfar
- Teaching and Research Assistant, Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Research Associate, Division of Oral Health and Society, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and Visiting Scholar, Department of Reconstructive Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Elham Emami
- Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Motahareh Ahmadi
- Research Assistant, Oral Health and Rehabilitation Research Unit, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Owis Eilayyan
- Teaching and Research Assistant, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Samer Abi-Nader
- Division Director and Associate Professor, Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Faleh Tamimi
- Associate Professor, Division of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patel DR, O'Brien T, Petrie A, Petridis H. A systematic review of outcome measurements and quality of studies evaluating fixed tooth-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2014; 23:421-33. [PMID: 24947268 PMCID: PMC4491372 DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/22/2013] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review was to review clinical studies of fixed tooth-supported prostheses, and to assess the quality of evidence with an emphasis on the assessment of the reporting of outcome measurements. Multiple hypotheses were generated to compare the effect of study type on different outcome modifiers and to compare the quality of publications before and after January 2005. MATERIALS AND METHODS An electronic search was conducted using specific databases (MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE via Ovid, Cochrane Library) through July 2012. This was complemented by hand searching the past 10 years of issues of the Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal of Prosthodontics, and the International Journal of Prosthodontics. All experimental and observational clinical studies evaluating survival, success, failure, and complications of tooth-supported extracoronal fixed partial dentures, crowns, and onlays were included. No restrictions on age or follow-up time were placed. RESULTS The electronic search generated 14,869 papers, of which 206 papers were included for full-text review. Hand-searching added 23 papers. Inclusion criteria were met by 182 papers and were included for the review. The majority were retrospective studies. Only 8 (4.4%) were randomized controlled trials. The majority of the studies measured survival and failure, and few studies recorded data on success; however, more than 60% of the studies failed to define survival, success, and failure. Many studies did not use any standardized criteria for assessment of the quality of the restorations and, when standardized criteria were used, they were modified, thereby not allowing for comparisons with other studies. There was an increase of 21.8% in the number of studies evaluating outcome measurements of all-ceramic restorations in past 8 years. CONCLUSIONS Prosthodontic literature presents with a reduced percentage of RCTs compared to other disciplines in dentistry. The overall quality of recording prosthodontic outcome measurements has not improved greatly in the past 8 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tim O'Brien
- Prosthodontics Unit, Department of Restorative Dentistry, UCL Eastman Dental InstituteLondon, UK
| | - Aviva Petrie
- Biostatistics Unit, UCL Eastman Dental InstituteLondon, UK
| | - Haralampos Petridis
- Prosthodontics Unit, Department of Restorative Dentistry, UCL Eastman Dental InstituteLondon, UK
| |
Collapse
|