Variations in steroid receptors and cyclic AMP binding proteins across human breast cancers: evidence for heterogeneity

Determination of estrogen receptors in paraffin-embedded tissue. Techniques and the value in breast cancer treatment

Estrogen receptor (ER) analysis in breast cancer has been used in three clinical situations: to select patients with advanced breast cancer for hormonal therapy, as a prognostic parameter, and for selection of women with early breast cancer to adjuvant hormonal treatment. ER has traditionally been measured using labelled hormone in binding assays--often in dextran-coated charcoal assays (DCC). Monoclonal antibodies to ER has permitted development of a solid phase enzyme immunoassay (ER-EIA) used for quantitative determination of ER in tissue homogenates, and have also been used for determination of ER using an immunohistochemical assay in frozen sections (ER-ICA) or in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue (ER-PAR). A large number of studies has compared ER-EIA with ER-DCC assays. There is a good linear correlation between the two types of assay but ER-EIA measure more ER and classify a larger fraction of tumors ER-positive than conventional ER assays. Lack of clinical data makes the significance of this uncertain. Numerous studies have reported on the correlation between ER-ICA and ER-DCC or ER-EIA. There is a good correlation among the assays on classification of ER status with a median 86% concordance, but a somewhat poorer correlation between semiquantified ER of immunohistochemical assays and ER determined by the quantitative methods (median coefficient of correlation 0.67). There is a large variation in the cut-off level for definition of ER-positive in immunohistochemical assays emphasizing the need for quality control studies. The major problem involved in ER analysis in paraffin-embedded tissue is a considerable loss of immunoreactivity compared to sections from frozen tissue. This can partly be overcome by modifications of the immunohistochemical technique using enzyme pretreatment and other amplification systems, but the sensitivity of ER-PAR remains lower than ER-ICA despite these modifications, and the ER status is less reliably determined in tumors with low ER contents (< 100 fmol). The prognostic value of ER-PAR was evaluated with a multivariate analysis. The endpoint was disease-free interval in systemically untreated patients with early breast cancer, and the variables used were: ER-DCC, ER-PAR, age, tumor size, tumor grade, and nodal status. A total of 133 patients from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group's (DBCG) 77c protocols had a complete set of variables. The analysis showed that only nodal status, ER-DCC, and tumor grade were significant and independent prognostic variables. An overview of larger multivariate studies on mainly node-negative patients failed to show independent prognostic significance of ER-DCC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Does the oestrogen receptor concentration of a breast cancer change during systemic therapy?

The effect of systemic therapy on tumour oestrogen receptor (ER) concentration has been studied in 88 patients with large, operable, primary tumours (total 89) of the breast. In 26 patients, tumour was not available for study on one occasion (usually post-treatment). Forty-five patients were treated initially by endocrine therapy but, of these, 13 who had failed to respond went on to receive chemotherapy also. Seventeen patients with low concentrations of ER (less than 20 fmol mg-1 protein) were treated directly by chemotherapy. Patients underwent an incisional biopsy for confirmation of diagnosis and determination of pre-treatment ER by radioligand binding assay, followed by systemic therapy for 3 months (or 6 months for both endocrine and cytotoxic therapies). Response was assessed clinically and mammographically before mastectomy. ER concentration was then determined in the post-treatment tumour specimen. No significant change in ER concentration was seen in any treatment group except when the patients had received tamoxifen; there, receptor concentration fell to very low levels, presumably due to interference with the assay. There was no relationship between tumour response to systemic treatment and change in ER concentration. It is concluded that changes in ER concentration are unlikely to play a major role in the early response of breast tumours to systemic therapy.

Cyclic AMP binding proteins and prognosis in breast cancer

Cyclic AMP binding proteins were measured in the primary tumour from 100 patients with non-disseminated breast cancer selected on the basis that sufficient tumour material was available for analysis. These measurements have been related to factors of established prognostic value and to the patients' disease-free interval and survival. There was a wide variation in amounts of binding proteins in different tumours. Values were significantly higher (P less than 0.05) in oestrogen receptor-negative tumours but no statistically significant correlations were apparent between levels and tumour grade or whether the patients had lymph node metastasis or adjuvant treatment. However, levels were significantly higher in patients whose disease recurred within 3 years of primary treatment as compared with those who remained disease-free. Using a retrospectively determined cut off point of 8 pmol mg-1 cytosol protein, it was shown that patients with tumour cyclic AMP binding in excess of this value had a significantly greater chance of developing recurrent disease and poorer survival rates (P less than 0.001 by Cox analysis) than those with lower levels. This remained true when other prognostic factors were taken into account in a multivariate analysis. It is suggested that the level of tumour cyclic AMP binding may be an independent prognostic factor for patients with early breast cancer.

Variations associated with the DNA analysis of multiple fine needle aspirates obtained from breast cancer patients

The present study was carried out to determine the variation in DNA content between multiple fine needle aspirates (FNA) of the same tumour from patients with breast cancer. Analysis of different aliquots of the same FNA showed good reproducibility in terms of cell cycle distribution and DNA index. Duplicate FNAs taken from different sites in nine of 11 excised tumours showed similar reproducibility. However, two of the aneuploid tumours displayed substantial variations in the distribution of cell populations between the duplicate samples. Sequential FNAs with no intervening therapy were obtained from the same tumour in 17 patients; one at the time of diagnosis and the other at biopsy 1-3 weeks later. Only five cases showed no variation between the sequential FNAs; the remaining 12 displayed different DNA profiles. A further 13 patients were studied before and during systemic therapy. While there was no variation between sequential FNAs in four patients, marked differences in the DNA profile were observed in the remaining nine patients undergoing treatment, the changes not necessarily being associated with clinical response to therapy. It is concluded that the monitoring of cellular changes by DNA analysis of sequential FNAs may be complex and subject to problems associated with heterogenecity.

The cytochemical detection of oestrogen receptors in fine needle aspirates of breast cancer; correlation with biochemical assay and prediction of response to endocrine therapy

A total of 98 breast aspirates from patients with breast cancer have been fixed and stained for oestrogen receptors using the Abbott ERICA kit. In a preliminary series of 41 aspirates, cytochemical staining index (% cells staining x mean intensity) related to the receptor concentration determined biochemically on a subsequent biopsy with a correlation coefficient of +0.65. In a second series of 56 aspirates examined after lysis and cytocentrifugation, the correlation coefficient was +0.73. For 14 patients, the response of the primary tumour to endocrine therapy was assessed objectively by serial clinical and mammographic measurements (Forrest et al., 1986) and was found to relate strongly to the cytochemical staining of the initial aspirate. The potential and limitations of this technique are discussed.

Oestrogen receptors, lactate dehydrogenase and cellularity in human breast cancer

Oestrogen receptor (ER) concentrations in breast tissues are almost universally expressed in relation to total soluble protein, though the latter does not fully correct for gross variations in receptor concentration due to variations in tissue cellularity. It was considered possible that the concentration of a specific glycolytic enzyme might be a better index and reflection of tumour cellularity. Measurements of the concentrations of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), oestrogen receptor and total soluble protein and estimates of tumour cellularity were therefore performed on 98 breast tissues (80 breast cancers, 18 benign tissues). Cellularity and the concentrations of oestrogen receptor, lactate dehydrogenase and total soluble protein were significantly higher in breast cancers than in the benign tissues. The concentration of oestrogen receptors (positives only) was, as expected, related to tissue cellularity (correlation coefficient, r = 0.35). The concentrations of both LDH and total soluble protein were also both strongly related to tissue cellularity (correlation coefficients r = 0.67 and 0.75, respectively), and to each other (r = 0.78). These results suggest that (1) total soluble protein concentration is a good index of cellularity and (2) there is unlikely to be any additional value in expressing receptor concentrations relative to LDH since the latter appears to be a 'typical' soluble protein.

Relationship between estrogen receptor status in the primary tumor and its regional and distant metastases. An immunohistochemical study in human breast cancer

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer based on the estrogen receptor content (ER) of the primary tumor builds on the assumption that the ER status of the primary tumor and the metastases are largely equal. Studies addressing this question have used ligand-binding assays for ER determination and have consequently been subject to the limitations of this technique. Reported disparity rates have been 20%. In order to avoid some of these limitations, we used an immunohistochemical assay in paraffin-embedded tissue. Among a total of 92 examined regional lymph node metastases, ER status was equal with that of their 37 primaries in 84 cases (91%). Semiquantified ER content was significantly correlated in primary tumor and the metastases (r = 0.67, p less than 0.001). Among a total of 51 distant metastases, equal ER status was found in 44 (86%) cases and a quantitative relationship could not be established. Disparities can be due to methodological errors in the histochemical assay or tumor heterogeneity.