Longevity in small cell lung cancer. A report to the Lung Cancer Subcommittee of the United Kingdom Coordinating Committee for Cancer Research

Trends in Epidemiology and Outcome of Small Cell Lung Cancer over 10 Years at Tertiary Cancer Care Center in Iran

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death. Among different lung cancer histopathologies, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been known to be the most aggressive and lethal nature. This study analyzed the epidemiological characteristics, outcomes, and trends of SCLC at a tertiary cancer care center in Iran.

Materials and Methods

Retrospectively collected demographic characteristics and survival outcome data on histologically proven SCLC patients during 2009-2019 at the National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (NRITLD) were reviewed.

Results

In a study of 334 SCLC patients, there were more male patients than female, with a ratio of 2.5 to 1, and the mean age at diagnosis was 58.36 years. While gender distribution and smoking status among women remained consistent over the study period, there was a significant increase in male smokers (P<0.001). Female patients were diagnosed at younger age and had a significantly lower proportion of smokers compared to males (P<0.016). The mean and median overall survival were 10.9 and 8.2 months, with one-, two-, and three-year survival rates of 21%, 10%, and 3% respectively. Younger patients and females had significantly higher survival rates. In both uni/multivariate analyses, only age < 58 years and female gender were significantly associated with longer survival.

Conclusion

The relatively unchanged trend of SCLC in our series suggests that further research on prevention strategies especially smoking cessation, early detection, and new treatment options is urgently required.

Progression-free survival: an important prognostic marker for long-term survival of small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an extremely aggressive tumor with a poor clinical course. Although many efforts have been made to improve patients' survival rates, patients who survive longer than 2 years after chemotherapy are still very rare. We examined the baseline characteristics of patients with long-term survival rates in order to identify the prognostic factors for overall survivals.

METHODS

A total of 242 patients with cytologically or histologically diagnosed SCLC were enrolled into this study. The patients were categorized into long- and short-term survival groups by using a survival cut-off of 2 years after diagnosis. Cox's analyses were performed to identify the independent factors.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 65.66 years, and 85.5% were males; among the patients, 61 of them (25.2%) survived longer than 2 years. In the multivariate analyses, CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 2.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-6.06; p=0.012), TNM staging (HR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.59-6.80; p=0.001), and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 11.14; 95% CI, 2.98-41.73; p<0.001) were independent prognostic markers for poor survival rates.

CONCLUSION

In addition to other well-known prognostic factors, this study discovered relationships between the long-term survival rates and serum CRP levels, TNM staging, and PFS. In situations with unfavorable conditions, the PFS would be particularly helpful for managing SCLC patients.

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small celI lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 30 years, even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients should be palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of first-line chemotherapy versus placebo or best supportive care (BSC) in prolonging survival in patients with extensive SCLC at diagnosis and the effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy at relapse or progression after first-line chemotherapy compared with BSC or placebo in prolonging survival in patients with extensive SCLC; as well as to evaluate the adverse events of treatment and the quality of life of patients.

SEARCH METHODS

This is the second update of the review. MEDLINE (1966 to October 2013), EMBASE (1974 to October 2013), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2012, Issue 3) were searched. Experts in the field were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Phase III randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with  placebo or BSC in patients with extensive SCLC, as first-line or second-line therapy at relapse.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Additional information was obtained from one study author.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies of unclear risk of bias were included for first-line chemotherapy. A total of 88 men under 70 years with good performance status were randomised to receive either supportive care, placebo infusion or ifosfamide. Ifosfamide gave an extra mean survival of 78.5 days compared with supportive care or placebo infusion. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group and quality of life was only assessed at the beginning of treatment. The quality of the evidence for overall survival and adverse effects was very low.Three studies of moderate risk of bias were included for second-line chemotherapy at relapse (one identified in the last search). A total of 932 men and women under 75 years and any performance status were randomised to receive either methotrexate-doxorubicin, topotecan, or picoplatin versus symptomatic treatment or BSC. The methotrexate-doxorubicin treatment gave a median survival of 63 days longer than in the symptomatic-treatment group for patients allocated to receive four cycles of first-line chemotherapy, and 21 days longer for patients allocated to receive eight cycles of first-line chemotherapy.Treatment with topotecan gave a median survival of 84 days longer than in the BSC group (log-rank P = 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival was 0.61 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.87). Treatment with picoplatin gave a median survival time of six days longer than BSC (HR 0.817, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.03, P = 0.0895). A meta-analysis of topotecan and picoplatin gave a HR of 0.73 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.96, P = 0.03; low-quality evidence).Partial or complete response in the methotrexate-doxorubicin group was 22.3%. Five patients (7%, 95% CI 2.33 to 15.67) showed a partial response with topotecan. No data were provided about tumour response in the picoplatin study. Toxicity was worst in the chemotherapy group (moderate-quality evidence). Quality of life was better in the topotecan group and was not measured in the methotrexate-doxorubicin and picoplatin studies (low-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Two small RCTs from the 1970s suggest that first-line chemotherapeutic treatment (based on ifosfamide) may provide a small survival benefit (less than three months) in comparison with supportive care or placebo infusion in patients with advanced SCLC. However platinum-based combination chemotherapy regimens have been shown to increase complete response rates when compared to non-platinum chemotherapy regimens with no significant difference in survival, and so these are currently the standard first-line treatment for patients with SCLC.Second-line chemotherapy at relapse or progression may prolong survival for some weeks in relation to BSC. Nevertheless, the impact of first-line chemotherapy on quality of life, older patients, women and patients with poor prognosis is unknown and the benefits of second-line chemotherapy are also unclear for older people. Globally, the evidence on which these conclusions are based is very scarce and of uncertain or low quality, which calls for well-designed, controlled trials to further evaluate the trade-offs between benefits and risks of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced SCLC.

Treatment and survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer: small steps forward, but not for patients >80

BACKGROUND

Seventy-five percent of newly diagnosed patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are aged 60+ and quite a few are treated less aggressively because of fear of toxic effects. We described trends in treatment and survival of unselected SCLC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For the present study, all 13,007 SCLC patients aged 60+ diagnosed in The Netherlands from 1997 to 2007 were included.

RESULTS

Among patients with limited disease, the proportion receiving chemoradiation increased from 35% to almost 60% for those aged 60-69, from 28% to 48% in age group 70-74, from 17% to 33% in age group 75-79, but remained <10% for those aged 80+. Among patients with extensive disease, the proportion receiving chemotherapy (CT) decreased from 81% of patients aged 60-64 to 23% of those aged 85+, without substantial changes over time. Survival has only improved for patients <80 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CT (+radiotherapy) has improved survival for unselected SCLC patients <80. A better understanding of the impact of frailty on completion of treatment and toxic effects among patients aged 80+ would enable the treating physician to anticipate toxic effects better and to discuss risks and benefits of treatment with the patient.

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small celI lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 30 years even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients should be palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy in extensive SCLC compared with best supportive care (BSC) or placebo treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE (1966 to July 2008), EMBASE (1974 to week 31, 2008), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2008). Experts in the field were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with placebo or BSC in patients with extensive SCLC, as first or second therapy at relapse.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Additional information was obtained from one study author.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies were included for first-line chemotherapy. A total of 65 patients were randomised to receive either placebo or ifosfamide. Ifosfamide gave an extra mean survival of 78.5 days compared with placebo. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group.Two studies were included for second-line chemotherapy at relapse. A total of 531 patients were randomised to receive either methotrexate-doxorubicin or symptomatic treatment, or to receive oral topotecan versus BSC. The methotrexate-doxorubicin treatment gave a median survival of 63 days longer than in the symptomatic treatment group, and 21 days longer for patients allocated to receive four or eight cycles of first-line chemotherapy, respectively.Treatment with topotecan gave a median survival of 84 days longer than in the BSC group (log-rank P = 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87). Partial or complete response in the methotrexate-doxorubicin group was 22.3%. Five patients (7%, 95% CI, 2.33 to 15.67) showed a partial response with topotecan. Toxicity was worst in the chemotherapy group. Quality of life was better in the topotecan group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in comparison with placebo in patients with advanced SCLC. Nevertheless, the impact of first-line chemotherapy on quality of life and in patients with poor prognosis is unknown. Well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced SCLC.

Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very fast growing form of cancer and is characterised by early metastasis. As a result, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. A number of different platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimens have been used for the treatment of SCLC, with varying results. This review was conducted to analyse the data from these trials in order to compare their effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of platinum chemotherapy regimens compared with non-platinum chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of SCLC with respect to survival, tumour response, toxicity and quality of life.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the biomedical literature databases CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from 1966 to April 2007. In addition, we handsearched reference lists from relevant resources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials involving patients with pathologically confirmed (cytological or histological) SCLC and the use of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in at least one treatment arm and a non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in a separate arm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed search results. We assessed included studies for methodological quality and recorded the following outcome data: survival, tumour response, toxicity and quality of life. We combined the results of the survival, tumour response and toxicity data in a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 29 trials involving 5530 patients were included in this systematic review. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups in terms of survival at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of overall tumour response. However, platinum-based treatment regimens did have a significantly higher rate of complete response. Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens had significantly higher rates of nausea and vomiting, anaemia and thrombocytopenia toxicity. Three trials presented quality of life data but the data presented were not complete and therefore could not be combined in a meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did not offer a statistically significant benefit in survival or overall tumour response compared with non-platinum-based regimens. However, platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did increase complete response rates, at the cost of higher adverse events including nausea and vomiting, anaemia and thrombocytopenia toxicity. These data suggest non-platinum chemotherapy regimens have a more advantageous risk-benefit profile. This systematic review highlights the lack of quality of life data in trials involving chemotherapy treatment for SCLC. With poor long-term survival associated with both treatment groups, the issue of the quality of the survival period takes on even more significance. It would be beneficial for future trials in this area to include a quality of life assessment.

Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Unusual Therapeutic Approach with More than 10-year Overall Survival. Case Report and Review of the Literature

Small-cell lung cancer is the most aggressive lung cancer, with a dismal prognosis. The authors present a case report of a patient with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer who underwent a thoracotomy for diagnostic purposes, with the diagnosis being made after surgical excision. Combination chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for both limited and extensive disease. Radiotherapy has been established as an adjunct to chemotherapy in limited-stage disease, while in extensive-stage disease it is mostly reserved for the treatment of brain metastases. As for surgery, the potential benefits of resection are predominantly seen in patients who present with a solitary pulmonary nodule. Since small-cell lung cancer becomes highly resistant to chemotherapy, second-line chemotherapeutic schemes are used for disease progression, with topotecan being the highlighted agent. Despite the unusual therapeutic approach, where surgery was preferred over the standard diagnostic and staging procedures, the patient's more than ten years’ survival makes this case presentation a very interesting one.

Long-term survival of a patient with small cell lung cancer associated with cancer-associated retinopathy

Cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) is a rare paraneoplastic disorder that is frequently found in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC); it is caused by autoantibody to the 23-kDa photoreceptor protein, recoverin. We report a 9-year survivor of SCLC after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. His anti-recoverin antibody remains positive. Long-term survival without SCLC recurrence might be related to an autoimmunity mechanism that causes CAR due to the presence of anti-recoverin antibody cross-reacting with retinal cells and tumor cells. The current literature review was conducted to evaluate the impact on overall survival according to anti-recoverin antibody status.

Small cell lung cancer: treatment review

Lung cancer was relatively uncommon at the turn of the 20th century, and has increased in prevalence at alarming rates, particularly because of the augmented trend in smoking, so that it is now the most common cause of cancer death in the world. As almost a quarter of these cancers are of small cell in origin, it seems only appropriate that small cell lung cancer receives ample attention, rather than seemingly to have been overlooked over the last 10-15 years. Despite its generally late presentation and high risk of dissemination, it is exceptionally sensitive to chemo-radiotherapy. This review looks at the diverse options of treatment that have been used over the last few years and tries to highlight the best available. As more than 50% of patients diagnosed with lung cancer are over 70 years of age and various studies have shown that older people respond just as well as their younger counterparts, with similar results in response rates, toxicity and outcomes, it is imperative that the older generation are not disregarded in terms of age being a contraindication to therapy.

Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (Caelyx) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine as second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite chemotherapy and radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), most patients die within 2 years. Response rates for second-line chemotherapy are 15-25%, with a median survival of 5 months. Caelyx, a pegylated liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, may be better tolerated and has activity in SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in a phase II study of intravenous Caelyx (35 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) and vincristine (1.2 mg/m2) every 21 days as second-line therapy in SCLC for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were evaluable for response, with a response rate of 10%. Another two had an unconfirmed response. Stable disease (SD) for >or=2 cycles was seen in an additional 53%. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was seen in 17 (55%) patients (26 [22%] cycles) and included fatigue, mucositis, plantar-palmar erythrodysesthesia, rash and neuropathy. Twelve patients required transfusions. All patients on study have now expired, with a median survival of 28 weeks (7 months). For patients with SD or partial response, median time to progression was 15 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The combination of Caelyx, cyclophosphamide and vincristine, despite cyclophosphamide and Caelyx dose reductions, has modest activity in relapsed SCLC with acceptable toxicity.

Second-line chemotherapy in recurrent small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefit of crossover chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin (EP) versus cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine (CEV) at relapse after primary treatment with the opposite regimen in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Further, to compare the crossover group with patients not receiving chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 286 patients diagnosed with relapse after first-line chemotherapy, 120 patients received second-line chemotherapy and 166 patients received best supportive care. Fifty-six patients received EP after previous treatment with CEV, 52 received CEV after EP, and 12 patients were re-treated with the same regimen. Possible prognostic factors in the crossover group were identified at time for first-line chemotherapy and at relapse. The EP therapy comprised five courses of etoposide 100 mg/m(2) IV and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV on day 1, followed by oral etoposide 200 mg/m(2) daily on day 2-4. The CEV-regimen was five courses of epirubicin 50 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m(2), and vincristine 2 mg, all IV on day 1.

RESULTS

Patients administered second-line chemotherapy lived significantly longer with median survival 5.3 months compared to 2.2 months in patients with best supportive care only (P<0.001). The best supportive care patients had significantly worse PS status and more resistant disease. The crossover treatment group was well balanced regarding possible prognostic factors prior to initial treatment and at recurrence. No difference in survival was found (P=0.71). Univariate analysis revealed PS at recurrence, objective tumour response from initial chemotherapy, disease stage at first-line, LDH-, NSE-, and ALP at first-line to be significant prognostic factors for survival in the second-line setting. In a multivariate analysis, only PS at time of recurrence remained an independent prognostic factor (P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients administered second-line chemotherapy had significantly longer survival than patients administered best supportive care. However, this difference can be explained by more negative prognostic factors in the best supportive care group. No survival difference between EP and CEV crossover chemotherapy was found. Multivariate analysis revealed PS at time of relapse as the only independent predictor of survival in the crossover recurrent SCLC group.

Cisplatin activates Akt in small cell lung cancer cells and attenuates apoptosis by survivin upregulation

The inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) survivin is overexpressed in many tumors but is absent in most normal adult tissues. We report high levels of survivin expression in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and describe the role of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt pathway in survivin upregulation. Moreover, the cytoprotective function of survivin in response to the anti-cancer agent cisplatin (CDDP) was investigated. Negative modulation of PI3K/Akt using pharmacological inhibitors or dominant negative Akt (DN-Akt) decreased Akt kinase activity and resulted in decreased survivin expression and phosphorylation on Thr34, whereas transfection of constitutively active Akt (CA-Akt) increased survivin expression and phosphorylation. Interestingly, we found that treatment of SCLC cells with CDDP further increased survivin expression in a cell cycle independent manner by activation of Akt. CA-Akt or lentiviral survivin also inhibited apoptosis induced by CDDP, whereas DN-Akt or survivin-specific RNA interference sensitized cells to CDDP. We identified survivin as an anti-apoptotic protein in SCLC cells that is regulated by Akt, and demonstrate that treatment with the DNA damaging agent CDDP activates the PI3K/Akt/survivin pathway that in part protects cells from drug-induced apoptosis.

Women and small cell lung cancer: social characteristics, medical history, management and survival

The literature make it clear that lung cancer in women differs from that in men in several specific aspects. We conducted a retrospective study of the 967 consecutive recorded patients (696 men and 91 women after exclusions) diagnosed with small cell lung cancers (SCLC) between 1981 and 1994 in the Bas-Rhin population-based cancer registry to determine if such particularities could be observed in SCLC. Data included demographic and social characteristics, medical and smoking history, management (diagnosis and treatment), hospitalisation and survival. The end point for survival was 31 December 1998. Women were more frequently single, divorced, or widowed (P=0.007) and lived more often in urban areas (places with more than 10,000 inhabitants) (P=0.017). They differed significantly from men in their tobacco exposure (P=0.0001) and non-smoking rates (P=0.0003) but not in clinical presentation, except for more frequently elevated LDH levels (P=0.02). Bone marrow biopsies were more often performed in men (P=0.004), but management was otherwise comparable. The mean number of hospitalisations (for any reason) was comparable in both sexes but women tended to remain hospitalised longer (P=0.057). Overall survival did not differ, but women older than 70 years died sooner than their male counterparts (P=0.026). Our study confirms that some of gender differences reported in the lung cancer literature exist in SCLC. Sex-related differences in LDH levels have not previously been reported, to our knowledge. North American and European data concerning survival among women and men are discordant. Whether these gender differences are related to a real difference between the sexes or simply to differential exposure to carcinogens remains to be determined.

A Phase I Study of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Hydrochloride (Caelyx™) in Combination with Cyclophosphamide and Vincristine as Second-Line Treatment of Patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine the recommended phase II dose of liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx ; Doxil in the United States) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine for previously treated patients with good performance status with relapsed or refractory small-cell lung cancer. Twenty-one eligible patients were enrolled between November 1999 and September 2001 and received liposomal doxorubicin 25-40 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750-1000 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 intravenously (I.V.) every 21 days. At doses of liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 I.V., 1 of 6 patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and fever in cycle 2 and 2 of 6 developed grade 3 hand-foot syndrome during cycle 3. Therefore, the recommended phase II doses are liposomal doxorubicin 35 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and vincristine 1.2 mg/m2 I.V. every 21 days. Antitumor activity was seen at all dose levels. This combination is well tolerated and has evidence of antitumor activity. A phase II evaluation is ongoing.

Surgical treatment of small cell lung cancer

Chemoradiotherapy remains a gold standard in the treatment of limited-disease small cell lung cancer. Currently, three indications for the surgical treatment of very limited disease (stage I, II, or highly selected IIIa) small cell lung cancer can be identified: (1) primary surgery in peripheral clinical N0 lesions followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; (2) primary chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery +/- radiotherapy in patients with a good response to initial treatment; and (3) salvage operations in patients who recur or persist at the primary site but still have resectable disease. The value of these approaches has been assessed in retrospective analyses and prospective nonrandomized trials. A large prospective randomized trial failed to prove any added value for surgery in the multidisciplinary treatment of limited-disease small cell lung cancer, but very few very-limited-disease patients were included.

Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Combination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 25 years even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients, if their survival prognosis is limited, should be adequate palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy in extensive SCLC compared with best supportive care (BSC) or placebo treatment.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Medline (1966-Jan 2003), Embase (1974-Jan 2003), Cancerlit (1993-Jan 2003) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 4, 2002) were searched. In addition experts in the field were contacted to identify further studies not found by electronic searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with a placebo group or best supportive care in patients with extensive stage SCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and quality assessment were undertaken independently by two reviewers and disagreements were resolved by a third author. Additional information on the included studies was obtained from the author of the original studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Only two studies (the first published in 1977 and the second in 1982) met the inclusion criteria of the review. A total of 65 patients with extensive disease (33 in the first study and 32 in the second) were randomised to received either placebo treatment or ifosfamide. In the second study a third arm of comparison included ifosfamide plus CCNU. Ifosfamide gave an extra 78.5 days survival (mean survival time) compared with the placebo group. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group. Pooled analysis was not possible because only mean survival time was reported in both studies for patients with extensive disease.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in comparison with placebo in patients with advanced SCLC. Nevertheless the impact of chemotherapy on quality of life and in patients with poor prognosis is unknown. Well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer.

Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial with 5 years' follow-up

PURPOSE

To investigate whether chemotherapy with etoposide and cisplatin (EP) is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine (CEV) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 436 eligible patients were randomized to chemotherapy with EP (n = 218) or CEV (n = 218). Patients were stratified according to extent of disease (limited disease [LD], n = 214; extensive disease [ED], n = 222). The EP group received five courses of etoposide 100 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) IV on day 1, followed by oral etoposide 200 mg/m(2) daily on days 2 to 4. The CEV group received five courses of epirubicin 50 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), and vincristine 2 mg, all IV on day 1. In addition, LD patients received thoracic radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy cycle 3, and those achieving complete remission during the treatment period received prophylactic cranial irradiation.

RESULTS

The treatment groups were well balanced with regard to age, sex, and prognostic factors such as weight loss, and performance status. The 2- and 5-year survival rates in the EP arm (14% and 5%, P =.0004) were significantly higher compared with those in the CEV arm (6% and 2%). Among LD patients, median survival time was 14.5 months versus 9.7 months in the EP and CEV arms, respectively (P =.001). The 2- and 5-year survival rates of 25% and 10% in the EP arm compared with 8% and 3% in the CEV arm (P =.0001). For ED patients, there was no significant survival difference between the treatment arms. Quality-of-life assessments revealed no major differences between the randomized groups.

CONCLUSION

EP is superior to CEV in LD-SCLC patients. In ED-SCLC patients, the benefits of EP and CEV chemotherapy seem equivalent, with similar survival time and quality of life.

Outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit with newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer

Patients with newly diagnosed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) may be considered for admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Even though SCLC is highly responsive to chemotherapy, it is not clear whether patient outcomes justify the resource use of an ICU. This paper reports the results of a retrospective review of 20 newly diagnosed cases of SCLC who were admitted to one of three ICUs in Melbourne, Australia. Patients who had more than one negative prognostic factor did uniformly poorly, with no survivors beyond 4 months. Five patients were treated with chemotherapy whilst intubated and receiving mechanical ventilatory support. Two of these patients responded to chemotherapy and were extubated 4 days later. Both of these patients were alive and free of tumour recurrence 7 months later. In contrast, patients not treated with chemotherapy died early (within 40 days). We conclude that some patients with SCLC achieve a medium to long-term survival following treatment with chemotherapy instituted during or around the time of their admission to an ICU. The admission to an ICU of selected patients with SCLC may be justified, and prognostic indicators may be of benefit in making these difficult treatment decisions.

Lung cancer--where are we today? Current advances in staging and nonsurgical treatment

Lung cancer remains the commonest cause of cancer death in both men and women in the developed world, although mortality rates for men are dropping. Spiral computed tomography (CT) of the chest in middle-aged, smoking subjects may identify two to four times more lung cancers than a chest X-ray, with more than 70% of tumors being Stage I. The incidence of benign nodules is high, making interpretation difficult. Randomized controlled trials are required to determine whether spiral CT detects lung cancer early enough to improve mortality. Preoperative staging has relied on CT scans, but positron emission tomography scanning has greater sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy than CT and is recommended as the final confirmatory investigation when the CT shows resectable disease. In locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, there is a small advantage for the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy, but no advantage for postoperative radiotherapy. Chemotherapy gives no benefit when given as neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment around surgery. In advanced disease, newer cytotoxic agents confer a small survival advantage over older combinations, but the advantage in median survival over best supportive care remains a few months with modest improvements in quality of life. Survival with small cell lung cancer has shown little increase over the last 15 years despite multiple attempts to manipulate the timing, dose intensity of chemotherapy, and the potential of radiotherapy. Novel therapies are urgently needed for all cell types of lung cancer.

Identical chemotherapy schedules given on and off trial protocol in small cell lung cancer: response and survival results

Patients who are treated within clinical trials may have a survival benefit dependent on being a trial participant. A number of factors may produce such beneficial outcome including more rigorous adherence to a peer reviewed trial protocol, management by an experienced treatment team, being treated in a specialist centre etc. The current investigation compared patients treated on and off trial with the same standard arm treatment regimen. The results could then be interpreted without the confounding factors of differing treatment regimens, treatment teams or treatment hospitals. The results demonstrated given these circumstances that survival was no different for patients participating in a randomised trial compared with a group of patients similarly treated who were not eligible for trial entry or who declined randomisation. These results were obtained by the rigorous adherence to a defined protocol with the invaluable assistance of designated lung cancer staff.

High-grade gliomas in patients with prior systemic malignancies

BACKGROUND

The current study was conducted to characterize the impact of a prior malignancy on the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of high-grade glioma.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 21 patients with a histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), or anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) after a prior diagnosis of solid tumor or hematologic malignancy was conducted. Glioma histology (GBM vs. AA/AO), patient age (<or= 60 years vs. > 60 years), and extent of resection (biopsy vs. subtotal vs. complete) were evaluated for their prognostic influence.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients studied, 17 had GBM, 3 had AA, and 1 patient had high-grade AO. There were 25 systemic carcinomas diagnosed in 21 patients (18 solid tumors including breast carcinoma, prostate carcinoma, and melanoma and 7 hematologic malignancies). The glioma occurred within a previous radiation field in only three patients, two of whom had solid tumors and one of whom had a childhood hematologic malignancy. Surgical resection was the initial treatment for the brain tumor in 17 patients, and the majority of patients received radiation therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Four patients who initially were misdiagnosed as having brain metastases received whole brain radiation therapy as their initial treatment, thereby compromising optimal care. The overall median survival for all the patients in the current study was 14 months (range, 1-44 months) from the time of brain tumor diagnosis. The extent of resection was found to be the only prognostic variable that was associated with survival (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary glioma may occur in patients as a consequence of therapy for a prior malignancy, but most often represents a sporadic event. The outcome and recommended treatment are identical to those for patients with primary gliomas. Accurate diagnosis is essential; neuroimaging often is suggestive of a primary brain tumor and should initiate surgical intervention so that histopathology can be obtained early and appropriate treatment instituted.

A phase II study of CI-980 in previously untreated extensive small cell lung cancer: an Ohio State University phase II research consortium study

CI-980, (ethyl (S)-(5-amino-1,2-dihydro-2-methyl-3-phenylpyrido[3,4-b] pyrazine-7-yl) carbamate 2-hydroxyethansulfonate (1:1)), is a water-soluble mitotic inhibitor. It acts by binding to the colchicine-binding site on tubulin, a site different from that of the vinca alkaloids, inhibiting tubulin polymerization. Cells exposed to CI-980 accumulate in M phase and die. In preclinical tumor models, CI-980 showed a broad spectrum of activity, including in multi-drug resistant tumor cell lines, with activity at least equal to that of vincristine. Extensive small cell lung cancer, despite its responsiveness to chemotherapy, is usually an incurable disease with survival in patients of less than one year. Due to the preclinical activity of CI-980 and its similar mechanism of action to drugs effective in small cell lung cancer, a phase II trial in extensive small cell lung cancer was initiated by The Ohio State University Phase II Research Consortium. A "window of opportunity" design was chosen where a short six-week trial of the drug was given unless there was significant objective response. Twelve patients were entered in the study and underwent a total of 16 cycles of chemotherapy. The median age of the patients was 54 years old (range 34-71) and performance status was ECOG 0 (four patients), ECOG 1 (seven patients), and ECOG 2 (one patient). The patients were treated with a 72-hr infusion at a dose of 4.5 mg/m2/day. Toxicity was predominantly myelosuppression with granulocytopenia (nine episodes), and anemia (seven episodes). There were no objective responses with 11 patients being removed from study due to progressive disease. Evaluation of leukocyte microtubule structure in peripheral blood revealed microtubule depolymerization, which was seen after treatment (t = 72 hr) and was reversible within 24 hr of stopping the drug. We conclude that despite antitumor activity demonstrated in preclinical studies, CI-980 does not have biological activity in previously untreated small cell lung cancer at this dose and infusion protocol.

The health-related quality of life and survival of small-cell lung cancer patients: results of a companion study to CALGB 9033

The purposes of this study were 2-fold: to evaluate the impact of the schedule dependency of etoposide (3-day IV short course vs. a 21-day oral prolonged course) with cisplatin on the quality of life of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients; and to examine the effect of baseline quality of life variables on long-term survival, after adjustment for known demographic and clinical prognostic factors. Participants were 70 patients enrolled in the cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) protocol 9033. Quality of life was assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks by: the EORTC QLQ-30, the Centers for epidemiology studies--Depression short form, the medical outcomes study (MOS) social support questionnaire, and a scale of sleep quality. Contrary to expectations, study results suggested no significant differences in the patients' life quality and treatment response based on whether they received etoposide in a 3-day IV vs. a 21-day oral regimen. The use of the baseline variables in predicting overall survival indicated that patients who were non-white and with liver involvement had decreased survival. Brain involvement, being male, and higher depressive symptoms were also found to be borderline significant in predicting decreased survival in this patient population.

Upregulation of Bcl-2 is involved in the mediation of chemotherapy resistance in human small cell lung cancer cell lines

Chemotherapeutic drugs eliminate cancer cells by induction of apoptosis. Resistance to chemotherapy is partly due to a decreased apoptosis rate. Here we investigated resistance to anticancer drugs in 9 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines. Apoptosis was induced by cisplatin, doxorubicin and etoposide and was found to be independent of caspase-8 expression. Since caspase-8 is essential for signal transduction of death receptor-mediated apoptosis, all known death receptor systems are thus not required for drug-induced apoptosis in SCLC. Furthermore, we found that anticancer drugs could activate the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis without involvement of upstream caspases. Finally, by culturing 3 sensitive cell lines in subtherapeutic concentrations of etoposide, resistant cells were generated that exhibit cross-resistance to cisplatin and doxorubicin. Drug resistance was paralleled by strong upregulation of Bcl-2, which diminished apoptosis by inhibiting the loss of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential and the release of cytochrome c. The role of bcl-2 in these processes was supported by bcl-2 transfection and antisense inhibition. These results indicate that Bcl-2 contributes to drug resistance in SCLC, a finding that has profound therapeutic implications.

Randomized phase II study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine compared with single-agent carboplatin in patients with poor prognosis small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Information on the effect of chemotherapy in a group of patients with poor prognosis, poor performance status small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is scarce. A randomized study comparing single-agent carboplatin with combination chemotherapy in this largely unreported population of SCLC patients was undertaken.

METHODS

One hundred nineteen patients were allocated to four cycles of either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) or single-agent carboplatin. Patients had either a Karnofsky performance score < or = 50 and/or a prognostic score indicative of a 1-year survival rate < or = 15%.

RESULTS

Grade 3-4 neutropenia and intravenous antibiotic use were significantly more common with the CAV regimen (P < 0.005). Conversely, Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was more common (P < 0.0009) and platelet transfusion was more frequent (P < 0.05) with carboplatin therapy. Nonhematologic toxicity was similar in both treatment arms, except for alopecia with CAV therapy (P < 0.0007). Symptom relief occurred in 48% and 41% of patients in the CAV and carboplatin treatment arms, respectively. Dyspnea was improved in 66% and 41% of patients and cough was improved in 21% and 7% of patients in the CAV and carboplatin treatment arms, respectively. CAV therapy produced a higher response rate than carboplatin (38% vs. 25%), but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.15). The median overall survival for patients in the CAV and carboplatin treatment arms was 17 weeks and 15.9 weeks, respectively, with 1-year survival rates of 12% and 6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent carboplatin is a feasible treatment in patients with poor prognosis SCLC and produces response rates, relief of tumor-related symptoms, and survival similar to what is seen in patients who receive CAV chemotherapy. The lower risk of life-threatening sepsis and less need for hospitalization or intravenous antibiotic courses is advantageous in this susceptible patient population.

Ten-year follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group 8269: a phase II trial of concomitant cisplatin-etoposide and daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To report the long-term follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group-8269, a phase II North American cooperative group trial of concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, vincristine (PEV), and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for limited small-cell lung cancer (L-SCLC).

METHODS

114 eligible patients from 47 institutions enrolled between April, 1985 and March 1986. Patients had documented L-SCLC. Induction chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of PEV. TRT was administered at 1.8 Gy/fraction in 25 daily fractions to a total dose of 45 Gy, to begin concomitantly. Consolidative chemotherapy included two cycles of vincristine, methotrexate, etoposide, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was concurrent with the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy. The PCI dose was 30 Gy in 15 fractions of 2 Gy/fraction.

RESULTS

As of May 2000, 5 of 114 remain alive and progression-free with a minimum follow-up interval of 13.2 years, as of May 2000. The median follow-up interval is 14.2 years. Thirty eight patients died of causes other than SCLC and five patients are still alive and progression-free. Of the remaining 71 patients dying of SCLC, local failure (LF) occurred in 24% (17 patients), distant metastasis (DM) occurred in 35% (25 patients), simultaneous LF and DM occurred in 25% (18 patients), and was indeterminate in 16% (11 patients). Thus, LF was a component of failure in 49%. Twenty patients had the CNS as the initial site of failure. Eleven patients (10%) developed fatal second primary cancers, including two with acute myelogenous leukemia, two with squamous cell lung cancer, one each with breast, pancreas, prostate, renal cell, and myelodysplasia. One patient developed both a melanoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

There are long-term survivors with concomitant TRT and PEV. LF and DM are common. Pattern of failure suggests needs to improve local and systemic control.

Long-term survival of a poor-risk octogenarian following wedge resection under VATS for small-cell lung cancer: report of a case

We describe herein the case of an 81-year-old man who has remained disease-free for more than 3 years after undergoing a wedge resection of cStage I small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) under video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), with no adjunct chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The patient had compromised pulmonary function and was a poor surgical risk. As he could not have endured a conventional lobectomy or intensive chemotherapy, a nonanatomical wedge resection of the area of lung involved by the primary tumor was carried out under VATS. Cancer cells from the resected tumor were cultured and the growth characteristics and sensitivity to 12 anticancer drugs were examined. The majority of primary cultured cells proliferated in a monolayer, like paving stones, resembling the growth pattern of non-small-cell carcinoma cells in vitro. The subcultured cells were resistant to most of the drugs, but showed weak sensitivity to cisplatin (CDDP), adriamycin (ADR), and vincristine (VCR). Therefore, the patient was discharged with no adjunct postoperative therapy and was followed up at an outpatient clinic. He has remained alive and disease-free for more than 3 years. Thus, we considered that performing wedge resection under VATS for a primary tumor could be appropriate treatment for selected patients with cStage I SCLC in a peripheral region, especially if they are elderly and a poor surgical risk.

Trends in incidence and prognosis of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe

BACKGROUND

Since the incidence of the histological subtypes of lung cancer in industrialised countries has changed dramatically over the last two decades, we reviewed trends in the incidence and prognosis in North America, Australia, New Zealand and Europe, according to period of diagnosis and birth cohort and summarized explanations for changes in mortality.

METHODS

Review of the literature based on a computerised search (Medline database 1966-2000).

RESULTS

Although the incidence of lung cancer has been decreasing since the 1970s/1980s among men in North America, Australia, New Zealand and north-western Europe, the age-adjusted rate continues to increase among women in these countries, and among both men and women in southern and eastern Europe. These trends followed changes in smoking behaviour. The proportion of adenocarcinoma has been increasing over time; the most likely explanation is the shift to low-tar filter cigarettes during the 1960s and 1970s. Despite improvement in both the diagnosis and treatment, the overall prognosis for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer hardly improved over time. In contrast, the introduction and improvement of chemotherapy since the 1970s gave rise to an improvement in - only short-term (<2 years) - survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The epidemic of lung cancer is not over yet, especially in southern and eastern Europe. Except for short-term survival of small cell tumours, the prognosis for patients with lung cancer has not improved significantly.

Immunohistochemical analysis of small cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a report of four patients and a review of sixteen patients in the literature with ectopic hormone production

Small cell carcinoma (SCC) occurs mostly in the lung, and in some patients is accompanied by production of ectopic hormones. Small cell carcinoma of the head and neck is very rare. We report 4 patients with SCC of the head and neck (larynx, tonsil, maxillary sinus, and parotid gland). The patient with SCC of the maxillary sinus demonstrated a high level of plasma serotonin and overexpression of parathyroid hormone; however, he did not show any related symptoms. The patient with SCC of the tonsil showed the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone associated with antidiuretic hormone hyperproduction at the terminal stage. In the literature, 16 patients with SCC of the head and neck with ectopic hormone production have been reported. Antidiuretic hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone were the hormones that caused clinical symptoms (paraneoplastic syndromes). We believe that the evaluation of hormonal syndromes is valuable for diagnosis and treatment.

A randomized trial of amifostine as a cytoprotective agent in patients receiving chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer

A randomized trial was conducted to determine whether administration of Amifostine with chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer could decrease the toxicity. 84 patients with small cell lung cancer of favourable prognosis (limited disease, performance status 0-1; limited disease with performance status 2 but normal sodium and alkaline phosphatase, or extensive disease with performance status 0-1, normal sodium and alkaline phosphatase) received treatment with Ifosfamide 3 g/m(2)intravenously, Carboplatin (Glomerular filtration rate + 25) x6 mg intravenously, Etoposide 50 mg orally, twice daily, for 7 days, every 3 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive amifostine 740 mg/m(2)immediately prior to the intravenous drugs (n = 42) or to receive chemotherapy alone (n = 42). The two groups were similar with respect to baseline prognostic factors. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of grade III or IV neutropenia or thrombocytopenia between the two groups, nor in the response rate or overall survival, for which the median was 11 months in the chemotherapy only group and 14 months in the group treated with amifostine. This study has not shown a protective effect from the use of amifostine with this regimen and there does not appear to be any effect upon the efficacy of treatment.

Late recurrence of small-cell lung cancer: a case report

A 67-year-old man was admitted with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The patient was given four courses of platinum-containing chemotherapy followed by chest irradiation, and good partial response (PR) was obtained. The patient did well for 4 years, until he sought treatment for a painful subcutaneous tumor. Chest computed tomography scan revealed the mass extending from the tumor in lung parenchyma with osteolytic lesion of the third rib bone. Pathologic examination of the subcutaneous lesion revealed SCLC. The patient was given two courses of the same combination chemotherapy administered as initial therapy. Regression of the mass was observed, and the response was evaluated as a good PR. How to approach late recurrence of SCLC is discussed.

Rhenium-188-labeled anti-neural cell adhesion molecule antibodies with 2-iminothiolane modification for targeting small-cell lung cancer

We have evaluated the potential of 188Re-labeled monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) modified with 2-iminothiolane (2IT) for targeting small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Radiolabeled MAbs NK1NBL1 and C218 recognizing neural cell adhesion molecule were injected i.v. into athymic mice inoculated with human SCLC tumors, and the biodistribution was examined. NK1NBL1 localized in the tumors better than C218. 188Re-labeled MAbs cleared from the blood faster than 125I-labeled counterparts, resulting in higher tumor-to-blood ratios. In conclusion, the 188Re-labeled MAbs are attractive candidates for imaging and therapy of SCLC.

Predictive and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: current status

Clinical and laboratory parameters can predict response to chemotherapy and long term survival in small cell lung cancer, and may predict those at risk of early treatment related toxicity. This paper reviews the predictive models that have been developed to divide patients into prognostic groups for response and survival on the basis of clinical and laboratory parameters. These factors may be used for the stratification of patients in clinical trials and to help clinicians make appropriate treatment decisions for individual patients. A number of treatment-related factors can also affect outcomes. The evidence for interventions to prevent treatment deaths in high risk patients, such as prophylactic antibiotics, dosage modification or colony stimulating factor support are also reviewed.

Multiple courses of high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide with peripheral-blood progenitor cells and filgrastim for small-cell lung cancer: A feasibility study by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility and safety of multiple sequential courses of high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) administered in a multicenter setting to patients with small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-nine patients (limited disease, n = 30; extensive disease, n = 39) treated at 15 European centers were scheduled to receive three courses of high-dose chemotherapy with ifosfamide 10 g/m(2), carboplatin 1200 mg/m(2), and etoposide 1200 mg/m(2) (ICE) divided over 4 days at 28-day intervals. PBPCs were harvested before treatment and mobilized with epirubicin 150 mg/m(2) administered via an intravenous bolus divided over 2 days and filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d administered subcutaneously.

RESULTS

The performed leukaphereses (one to five per patient) yielded a median of 16.6 x 10(6)/kg (range, 1.0 to 96.6 x 10(6)/kg) CD34(+) cells, which was sufficient for three reinfusions. Fifty patients (72%) completed the treatment according to schedule. Nine patients completed two courses, and six patients completed one course of treatment. The increase in dose-intensity was 290% that of a standard ICE regimen. The median duration of myelosuppression was similar between courses, namely 4 days (range, 1 to 12 days) for leukocytes less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L and 4 days (range, 0 to 22 days) for thrombocytes less than 20 x 10(9)/L. Febrile neutropenia developed in 66% of courses, severe diarrhea in 14%, mucositis in 10%, and nausea and vomiting in 21% of courses. There were six cases of toxic death (9%), most of which occurred in the first year of accrual and thus were attributable to the learning curve. The antitumor effect of the regimen was reflected in an 86% remission rate (95% confidence interval [CI], 74% to 93%), with 51% of patients achieving a complete response (95% CI, 38% to 63%). Median overall survival was 18 months for patients with limited disease and 11 months for patients with extensive disease.

CONCLUSION

This multiple sequential high-dose ICE regimen could be safely administered on a multicenter basis to patients with small-cell lung cancer. The dose-intensity could be increased to 290% that of standard ICE regimen. The benefit of this approach is currently being tested in a randomized trial that aims to double the long-term rate of survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

The significance of NSE and CEA as a differentiation marker for the cellular heterogeneity of small cell lung cancer

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in the culture supernatant of the 65 pulmonary carcinoma cell lines: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) 18, large cell carcinoma 14, squamous cell carcinoma 14, adenocarcinoma 14 and adenosquamous cell carcinoma 5, were measured by a radioimmunoassay (RIA). The mean value of NSE was 30.8+/-22.4 ng/ml and 9.2+/-8.7 ng/ml in SCLC and non-SCLC, respectively. The mean value of CEA was 15.1+/-20.9 ng/ml and 26.6+/-72.3 ng/ml in SCLC and non-SCLC, respectively. A significant difference in NSE levels was obtained between SCLC cell lines and non-SCLC cell lines. In SCLC cell lines, a significant inverse proportional correlation was observed between NSE and CEA levels. The CEA production tended to be higher in cells with low levels of NSE than in those with high NSE production. With respect to correlation between marker production and growth characteristics of SCLC cells in vitro, significantly higher NSE and lower CEA levels were found in cells growing with floating colony or neurite like characteristics (classic cell type) than those in cells with epithelial or intermediate growth characteristics (variant cell type). A significant positive correlation between NSE levels and the survival periods was found in follow-up studies of 10 patients who underwent surgery with complete resection of the primary tumor. All of 4 long term survivors over 3 years after surgery had significantly high NSE and relatively low CEA producing tumors. The relationship of these markers to clinical status of the patient suggests that an analysis for correlation of NSE and CEA levels in SCLC patients may be useful to discriminate between a pure neuroendocrine SCLC tumor and a mixed small cell/large cell tumor, and in monitoring therapeutic effect and prognosis of each patient.

Current guidelines for the management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20% to 25% of cases of bronchogenic carcinoma and results in pronounced morbidity and mortality in the United States. More than 90% of cases of SCLC are caused by cigarette smoking. Common pulmonary manifestations are dyspnea, persistent cough, hemoptysis, and postobstructive pneumonia. At the time of diagnosis, patients usually have extensive disease. To date, therapeutic approaches have made only modest advances in outcome. Combined modality approaches, such as radiotherapy administered concomitantly with the initiation of chemotherapy, induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy administered during the subsequent courses of chemotherapy, sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and courses of radiotherapy split between cycles of chemotherapy, are important for improving survival in patients with SCLC.

Surgery in limited stage small cell lung cancer

The role of surgery in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is controversial. Surgery has several potential advantages because it may reduce the frequency of local relapses, it does not impede the intensity of chemotherapy, it does not affect the bone marrow, and surgical staging may be of prognostic significance. Several smaller retrospective studies which focus on surgery alone, surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or chemotherapy followed by adjuvant surgery have been reported. Five-year survival data have ranged from 10-50% according to stage, both T-status and nodal status appearing to be significant prognostic factors. Only one prospective randomized trial has been reported concerning the addition of surgery to chemotherapy alone. This trial does not favour surgery. The reason for this could be a selection bias in the smaller non-randomized studies or a result of stage migration. Nevertheless, surgery may yet play an important role in SCLC, especially in diagnosis and staging, and with new improved non-invasive staging procedures, such as positron emission tomography, resection may lead to cure in selected patients. Prospective randomized studies are needed to settle this issue.

Weekly alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer with a good prognosis: a study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group

This trial was conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group to improve the responses and survival in small cell lung cancer with a good prognosis, using a weekly intensive chemotherapy with alternated non-cross-resistant myelosuppressive agents. Patients were classified into two groups; group A consisted of those who received the initial designed regimen (29 patients), and group B consisted of those who received the more intensified regimen that increased by 25% the doses of carboplatin, epirubicin, and ifosfamide, and by 33% the doses of etoposide given on days 1, 2, and 3 with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Chemotherapy in group A consisted of carboplatin 150 mg/m2 in 250 ml of 5% dextrose in water as an 1-hour infusion on day 1, etoposide 75 mg/m2 in 250 ml normal saline as an 1-hour infusion on days 1 and 2 alternating with epirubicin 30 mg/m2 intravenous push on day 8, and ifosfamide 2 g/m2 in 500 ml 5% dextrose in water as a 2-hour infusion with mesna protection on day 8. Responding patients with limited disease were also treated with thoracic irradiation. Those who achieved complete response received prophylactic cranial radiotherapy. In group A, the overall response rate was 79.3%, with a 27.6% complete response rate, a median time to progression of 5.71 months, and a median survival of 8.3 months. For patients with limited disease, the response rate was 75%, with a 40% complete response rate, a median time to progression of 5.87 months, and a median survival of 10.98 months. The respective numbers for extensive disease were 89% (only partial responses), 4.82 months, and 5.67 months. The toxicity was mild and manageable. There were no dose reductions or treatment delays. In view of the excellent tolerability and the rather low efficacy of the initial regimen, we decided to administer the more intensified one with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. In Group B, the overall response rate was 91.8%, with a 45.9% complete response rate, a median time to progression of 7.05 months, and a median survival of 10.16 months. For limited disease, the response rate was 93%, with a 52% complete response rate, a median time to progression of 7.05 months, and a median survival of 10.49 months. The respective numbers for extensive disease were 88% (25% complete response), 6.82 months, and 9.02 months. The toxicity of this more intensified regimen was more severe but acceptable. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity. However, grade 3-4 febrile neutropenia requiring hospitalization occurred only in 6% of patients. The relative dose intensity was 91%, probably the result of the prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The differences in response rate, time to progression, and survival were not statistically significant between the two groups. There were statistically significant differences in the response rate (p = 0.019) and survival rate (p = 0.001) between limited disease and extensive disease only in group A. In conclusion, this weekly, alternated regimen, specifically the intensified regimen, appears to be very active and well tolerated in patient who have small cell lung cancer with a good prognosis. However, despite the high efficacy, this study failed to show any survival advantage as compared with that obtained with the standard treatment for small cell lung cancer.

Variation in survival of patients with lung cancer in Europe, 1985-1989. EUROCARE Working Group

In this study, we report on the variation in the prognosis for adult patients with lung cancer within Europe, by age, histology and country from 1985-1989. We considered trends in survival since 1978 for most countries. Survival analysis was carried out on 173,448 lung cancer cases diagnosed between 1985 and 1989 in 44 population-based cancer registries, participating in the EUROCARE study. Relative 1-year survival rates for patients with lung cancer varied from 24 to 40%, being highest in Finland, France, The Netherlands and Switzerland and lowest in Denmark, England, Poland and Scotland. Half of all patients under the age of 45 years died within 1 year of diagnosis, increasing to almost 80% for those aged 75 years or older. Whilst the prognosis for patients with non-small cell carcinoma remained more or less constant between 1978 and 1989 (25% in Denmark and 44% in Finland), that for patients with small cell carcinoma improved slightly, especially in The Netherlands (Eindhoven from 17 to 24%) and Switzerland (Geneva from 24 to 32%). In conclusion, a fairly large variation in lung cancer relative survival rates existed between European countries. The most likely explanation for the differences is the variation in access to specialised care. Except for a slight improvement in short-term survival for patients with small cell lung cancer, survival has remained poor since 1978.

Synergistic cytotoxicity of bcl-2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotides and etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin on small-cell lung cancer cell lines

Expression of Bcl-2 is life-sustaining for small-cell lung cancer cells and associated with drug resistance. In the present study, the interactions between the bcl-2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide 2009 and the chemotherapeutic agents etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin were investigated on small-cell lung cancer cell lines to search for synergistic combinations. The cell lines NCI-H69, SW2 and NCI-H82 express high, intermediate-high and low basal levels of Bcl-2, respectively, which are inversely correlated with the sensitivities of the cell lines to treatment with oligodeoxynucleotide 2009 and the chemotherapeutic agents alone. Moreover, differences were found in the responsiveness of the cell lines to treatment with combinations of oligodeoxynucleotide 2009 and the chemotherapeutic agents. In the cell lines NCI-H69 and SW2, all combinations resulted in synergistic cytotoxicity. In NCI-H69 cells, maximum synergy with a combination index of 0.2 was achieved with the combination of oligodeoxynucleotide 2009 and etoposide. In SW2 cells, the combination of oligodeoxynucleotide 2009 and doxorubicin was the most effective (combination index = 0.5). In the cell line NCI-H82, which expresses a low basal level of Bcl-2, most of the combinations were slightly antagonistic. Our data suggest the use of oligodeoxynucleotide 2009 in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer that overexpresses Bcl-2.

Second lung cancers in patients after treatment for an initial lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Prospectively and retrospectively identified patient cohorts that were successfully treated for primary lung cancer have been followed to document the rate of development of and the effectiveness of treatment of second lung cancers. This review was performed to assess rates of second lung cancer development, factors associated with the development of these cancers, and the success of their treatment.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched to identify articles published in English concerning lung cancers, second primary cancers, treatment of these cancers, and patient survival.

RESULTS

The risk of developing a second lung cancer in patients who survived resection of a non-small-cell lung cancer is approximately 1%-2% per patient per year. Approximately one half of the patients who develop second non-small-cell lung cancers can have these tumors resected. The median survival from diagnosis of a second lung cancer in these patients is between 1 and 2 years, with a 5-year survival of approximately 20% (range, 4%-32%). The average risk of developing a second lung cancer in patients who survived small-cell lung cancer is approximately 6% per patient per year. For patients who survived small-cell cancer, the risk increases from approximately 2% to greater than 10% per patient per year 10 years after initial treatment. Only 7% (range, 6%-12%) of patients treated for small-cell lung cancer survive 2 years or more. Survivors who continue to smoke cigarettes have an increased risk of developing a second lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients surviving an initial lung cancer, the cumulative risk for the development of a second primary lung cancer makes this cancer a common cause of death. The high risk of developing a second lung cancer makes patients with these cancers an important population for study of surveillance strategies and chemoprevention agents.

Cancer chemotherapy in the elderly

As the geriatric population is growing, it is increasingly important to be familiar with chemotherapy for the elderly. Age-related changes in pharmacokinetics are documented for doxorubicin, etoposide, ifosfamide, daunorubicin, mitomycin, cisplatin and methotrexate. The hematological toxicity of most standard-dose chemotherapy is not affected by age in patients with normal organic functions and good performance status, although increased toxicity with aging is suggested in the use of actinomycin-D, etoposide, vinblastin, methotrexate, methyl-CCNU, doxorubicin and mitomycin, and in dose-intensive chemotherapy. Among non-hematological toxicities, only doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy and bleomycin-induced pulmonary toxicity are demonstrated to be accelerated in the elderly. There is no evidence that advanced age decreases the efficacy of chemotherapy for tumors, except for Hodgkin's disease and acute leukemia. These results suggest that advanced chronological age alone is not always associated with severe toxicity and poor prognosis, and that many elderly patients with cancer will benefit from chemotherapy. To answer questions regarding the optimal chemotherapy regimen, dose and intensity in this population, the influence of age should be analyzed in a multivariate approach in future studies.

Improvement and plateau in survival of small-cell lung cancer since 1975: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Cytotoxic therapy appears to have improved short-term survival for patients with small-cell lung cancer, but little is known about the results for unselected patients and trends in long-term survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One thousand seven hundred ninety-six patients with small-cell lung cancer diagnosed between 1975 and 1994 in southeastern Netherlands. We studied treatment policy for and survival of unselected patients since 1975, when cytotoxic therapy emerged.

RESULTS

The proportion patients receiving chemotherapy, with or without irradiation, almost tripled from 30% to 82% for patients younger than 70 years of age and from 15% to 56% for those over 70, whereas the proportion receiving only radiotherapy decreased from 36% to 5% in both age groups. The short-term (< 2 year) survival rate improved markedly between 1975 and 1989, especially for patients younger than 70 (median survival increased from five to 10 months). Two-year survival remained poor (8%). Two percent of all patients younger than 70 years at diagnosis survived for at least eight years, but these patients still represent an excess five-year mortality of 39%.

CONCLUSIONS

In southeastern Netherlands short-term survival of patients with small-cell lung cancer improved markedly up to the end of the 1980s, but a major impact on cure rates has not been achieved.

Second primary cancer of the larynx in patients with lung cancer

Synchronous or metachronous second primary malignancies of the lung are sometimes encountered in patients with laryngeal cancer while the occurrence of a laryngeal second primary following cancer of the lung is rare. A two-armed study was conducted. A prospective arm in which the larynges of 56 terminal lung cancer patients were examined, and a retrospective arm incorporating both a chart study of 126 terminal head and neck cancer patients (HNCP) and a computerized search of all hospital records of patients with laryngeal and lung cancers. No laryngeal malignancy was found in the lung cancer patients' group and no antedating pulmonary malignancy was recorded in the terminal HNCP. The computerized search of 1778 lung cancer patients and 213 laryngeal cancer patients also failed to demonstrate cases where the former preceded the latter. In conclusion. No second primary of the larynx was found in lung cancer patients. These results compare with reports of large databases where cancer of the larynx was found in a negligible percentage of lung cancer survivors and theories explaining this are discussed.