Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) allows acceleration and dose intensity increase of CEF chemotherapy: a randomised study in patients with advanced breast cancer

Prophylactic antibiotics or G(M)-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN) and other infectious complications are some of the most serious treatment-related toxicities of chemotherapy for cancer, with a mortality rate of 2% to 21%. The two main types of prophylactic regimens are granulocyte (macrophage) colony-stimulating factors (G(M)-CSF) and antibiotics, frequently quinolones or cotrimoxazole. Current guidelines recommend the use of colony-stimulating factors when the risk of febrile neutropenia is above 20%, but they do not mention the use of antibiotics. However, both regimens have been shown to reduce the incidence of infections. Since no systematic review has compared the two regimens, a systematic review was undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of G(M)-CSF compared to antibiotics in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, databases of ongoing trials, and conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology (1980 to December 2015). We planned to include both full-text and abstract publications. Two review authors independently screened search results.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylaxis with G(M)-CSF versus antibiotics for the prevention of infection in cancer patients of all ages receiving chemotherapy. All study arms had to receive identical chemotherapy regimes and other supportive care. We included full-text, abstracts, and unpublished data if sufficient information on study design, participant characteristics, interventions and outcomes was available. We excluded cross-over trials, quasi-randomised trials and post-hoc retrospective trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the results of the search strategies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and analysed data according to standard Cochrane methods. We did final interpretation together with an experienced clinician.

MAIN RESULTS

In this updated review, we included no new randomised controlled trials. We included two trials in the review, one with 40 breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy and G-CSF compared to antibiotics, a second one evaluating 155 patients with small-cell lung cancer receiving GM-CSF or antibiotics.We judge the overall risk of bias as high in the G-CSF trial, as neither patients nor physicians were blinded and not all included patients were analysed as randomised (7 out of 40 patients). We considered the overall risk of bias in the GM-CSF to be moderate, because of the risk of performance bias (neither patients nor personnel were blinded), but low risk of selection and attrition bias.For the trial comparing G-CSF to antibiotics, all cause mortality was not reported. There was no evidence of a difference for infection-related mortality, with zero events in each arm. Microbiologically or clinically documented infections, severe infections, quality of life, and adverse events were not reported. There was no evidence of a difference in frequency of febrile neutropenia (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 2.84). The quality of the evidence for the two reported outcomes, infection-related mortality and frequency of febrile neutropenia, was very low, due to the low number of patients evaluated (high imprecision) and the high risk of bias.There was no evidence of a difference in terms of median survival time in the trial comparing GM-CSF and antibiotics. Two-year survival times were 6% (0 to 12%) in both arms (high imprecision, low quality of evidence). There were four toxic deaths in the GM-CSF arm and three in the antibiotics arm (3.8%), without evidence of a difference (RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.30 to 5.69; P = 0.71; low quality of evidence). There were 28% grade III or IV infections in the GM-CSF arm and 18% in the antibiotics arm, without any evidence of a difference (RR 1.55; 95% CI 0.86 to 2.80; P = 0.15, low quality of evidence). There were 5 episodes out of 360 cycles of grade IV infections in the GM-CSF arm and 3 episodes out of 334 cycles in the cotrimoxazole arm (0.8%), with no evidence of a difference (RR 1.55; 95% CI 0.37 to 6.42; P = 0.55; low quality of evidence). There was no significant difference between the two arms for non-haematological toxicities like diarrhoea, stomatitis, infections, neurologic, respiratory, or cardiac adverse events. Grade III and IV thrombopenia occurred significantly more frequently in the GM-CSF arm (60.8%) compared to the antibiotics arm (28.9%); (RR 2.10; 95% CI 1.41 to 3.12; P = 0.0002; low quality of evidence). Neither infection-related mortality, incidence of febrile neutropenia, nor quality of life were reported in this trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

As we only found two small trials with 195 patients altogether, no conclusion for clinical practice is possible. More trials are necessary to assess the benefits and harms of G(M)-CSF compared to antibiotics for infection prevention in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

High-dose or dose-intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy often causes myelosuppression and severe neutropenia among cancer patients. Severe neutropenia accompanied by fever, named febrile neutropenia (FN), is the most serious manifestation of neutropenia usually requiring hospitalization and intravenous antibiotics. FN and neutropenia can lead to chemotherapy treatment delays or dose reductions, which potentially compromises the effectiveness of cancer treatment and prospects for a cure. Granulocyte-macrophage (GM) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are administered during chemotherapy in order to prevent or reduce the incidence or the duration of FN and neutropenia.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of prophylactic colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) in reducing the incidence and duration of FN, and all-cause and infection-related mortality during chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, HEALTHSTAR, International Health Technology Assessment, SOMED, AMED and BIOSIS up to 8 August 2011. We also searched three Chinese databases (VIP, CNKI, CBM), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and OpenGrey.eu up to August 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CSFs (any dose) with placebo or no treatment in patients with breast cancer at any stage, at risk of developing FN while undergoing any type of chemotherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for binary outcomes. At least two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Trial authors were contacted for further details when information was unclear.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight RCTs involving 2156 participants with different stages of breast cancer and chemotherapy regimens. The trials were carried out between 1995 and 2008 and judged as being at least at moderate risk of bias. The strength of the evidence was weak for the majority of outcomes, which was mostly because of the small numbers of evaluable patients, varying definitions, as well as unclear measurements of the trials' outcomes and uncertain influences of supportive treatments on them. In most trials, the chemotherapy regimens had a risk of FN that was below the threshold at which current guidelines recommend routine primary prophylaxis with CSFs. Using CSFs significantly reduced the proportion of patients with FN (RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.70; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 12) but there was substantial heterogeneity which can be explained by possible differential effects of G-CSFs and GM-CSFs and different definitions of FN. A significant reduction in early mortality was observed in CSF-treated patients compared to placebo or no treatment (RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.77; NNTB 79). This finding was based on 23 fatal events in 2143 patients; wherein 19 of these 23 events occurred in one study and 17 events were attributed to progression of the disease by the study authors. For infection-related mortality, there were no significant differences between CSF and control groups (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.02 to 1.29). In CSF-treated patients, the risk for hospitalization was significantly reduced (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.30; NNTB 13), as well as the use of intravenous antibiotics (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.22 to 0.55; NNTB 18). The risks of severe neutropenia, infection or not maintaining the scheduled dose of chemotherapy did not differ between CSF-treated and control groups. CSFs frequently led to bone pain (RR 5.88; 95% CI 2.54 to 13.60; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 3) and injection-site reactions (RR 3.59; 95% CI 2.33 to 5.53; NNTH 3).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, CSFs have shown evidence of benefit in the prevention of FN. There is evidence, though less reliable, of a decrease of all-cause mortality during chemotherapy and a reduced need for hospital care. No reliable evidence was found for a reduction of infection-related mortality, a higher dose intensity of chemotherapy with CSFs or diminished rates of severe neutropenia and infections. The majority of adverse events reported from CSF use were bone pain and injection-site reactions but no conclusions could be drawn regarding late-term side effects.

Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Febrile neutropenia (FN) and other infectious complications are some of the most serious treatment-related toxicities of chemotherapy for cancer, with a mortality rate of 2% to 21%. The two main types of prophylactic regimens are granulocyte (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factors (GM-CSF); and antibiotics, frequently quinolones or cotrimoxazole. Important current guidelines recommend the use of colony stimulating factors when the risk of febrile neutropenia is above 20% but they do not mention the use of antibiotics. However, both regimens have been shown to reduce the incidence of infections. Since no systematic review has compared the two regimens, a systematic review was undertaken.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness of G-CSF or GM-CSF with antibiotics in cancer patients receiving myeloablative chemotherapy with respect to preventing fever, febrile neutropenia, infection, infection-related mortality, early mortality and improving quality of life.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, databases of ongoing trials, and conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology (1980 to 2007). We planned to include both full-text and abstract publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing prophylaxis with G-CSF or GM-CSF versus antibiotics in cancer patients of all ages receiving chemotherapy or bone marrow or stem cell transplantation were included for review. Both study arms had to receive identical chemotherapy regimes and other supportive care.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were done in duplicate. Authors were contacted to obtain missing data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two eligible randomised controlled trials with 195 patients. Due to differences in the outcomes reported, the trials could not be pooled for meta-analysis. Both trials showed non-significant results favouring antibiotics for the prevention of fever or hospitalisation for febrile neutropenia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence for or against antibiotics compared to G(M)-CSFs for the prevention of infections in cancer patients.

Dose-Dense Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer Patients: Results From a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

To determine whether a dose-dense regimen improves outcome in early breast cancer patients, we compared outcomes with the same fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapeutic regimen administered every 3 weeks (FEC21) or administered every 2 weeks (FEC14 including support with filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in a multicenter phase III randomized trial.

METHODS

A total of 1214 patients with early-stage breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of FEC14 (604 patients) or of FEC21 (610 patients). Study endpoints were overall survival and event-free survival. Associations were assessed by multivariable analysis with adjustment for age; tumor size; grade; proliferative rate; and menopausal, lymph node, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor status. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Patients in the FEC14 arm had fewer dose reductions or treatment delays or discontinuation (26%) than those in the FEC21 arm (33%) (difference = 7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2% to 12%; P = .008). FEC14 therapy, compared with FEC21 therapy, was associated with more asthenia (36% versus 29%, difference = 7%, 95% CI = 2% to 12%; P = .01), bone pain (33% versus 4%, difference = 29%, 95% CI = 25% to 33%; P < .001), anemia (38% versus 19%, difference = 19%, 95% CI = 14% to 24%; P < .001), and thrombocytopenia (8% versus 2%, difference = 6%, 95% CI = 4% to 9%; P < .001), but with less leukopenia (12% versus 45%, difference = 33%, 95% CI = 28% to 37%; P < .001). No acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome was observed. At a median follow-up of 10.4 years, no statistically significant difference in the hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.13) or recurrence (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.08) was found between FEC14 and FEC21 groups after adjustment by multivariable analysis. Although the study was underpowered for subset analysis, we found no evidence that the effect of the treatment type was associated with any of the potential prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the long-term safety of FEC14 chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. However, this therapy was not associated with improved outcome, but because of the limited statistical power of our study, we cannot rule out a modest improvement in outcome associated with FEC14 therapy.

Objective Response to Chemotherapy As a Potential Surrogate End Point of Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

To assess the validity of objective response to chemotherapy as a surrogate end point for survival in metastatic breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

We carried out a meta-analysis on individual data from 2,126 metastatic breast cancer patients who were enrolled onto 10 randomized trials comparing standard versus intensified epirubicin-containing chemotherapy.

Results

The intensified chemotherapy was associated with a significantly higher tumor response rate compared with standard chemotherapy (pooled odds ratio for nonresponse, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.72). The intensified regimens also led to better (although not significant) survival (pooled odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.04; P = .22). Tumor response was a highly significant predictor of survival (P < .0001). When tumor response was introduced in the Cox model, the hazard ratio in favor of experimental treatment changed from 0.94 to 1.005 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.11; P = .92), indicating that no residual effect of the experimental treatment on survival was present once tumor response was adjusted for. This suggests that the overall survival benefit of intensified epirubicin was a result of the increase in response rate. The median survival time of patients with complete response and partial response was 28.8 months (95% CI, 25.4 to 45.3 months) and 21.3 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 22.4 months), respectively; whereas, the median survival time of patients with no response was 14.6 months (95% CI, 13.9 to 15.4 months).

Conclusion

These results support the hypothesis that the achievement of an objective response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer is associated with a true survival benefit. The potential role of objective response as a surrogate end point for survival in chemotherapy trials of metastatic breast cancer warrants further investigation.

Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of a standard anthracycline-based regimen to a dose-intensified anthracycline regimen in locally advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Locally advanced breast cancer patients were randomly assigned onto a study comparing cyclophosphamide (C; 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), epirubicin (E; 60 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] days 1, 8), and fluorouracil (F; 500 mg/m(2) IV days 1, 8) six cycles every 28 days versus E (120 mg/m(2) IV day 1), C (830 mg/m(2) IV day 1), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 5 micro g/kg/d subcutaneously days 2 to 13) six cycles every 14 days. The study was designed to detect a 15% improvement; that is, from 50% to 65% in median progression-free survival (PFS) in favor of the dose-intensified regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 448 patients were enrolled over a period of 3 years. The median dose intensity delivered for C and E reached, respectively, 85% and 87% of that planned in the CEF arm and 96% and 95% of that planned in the EC arm. The dose-intensified arm was slightly more emetogenic and generated more grade 3 to 4 anemia but less febrile neutropenia episodes. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 277 events have been reported. The median PFS was 34 and 33.7 months for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.68), and the 5-year survival rate was 53% and 51% for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.94).

CONCLUSION

Dose-intensified EC does not provide a measurable therapeutic benefit over CEF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unselected locally advanced breast cancer patients.

Is first-line single-agent mitoxantrone in the treatment of high-risk metastatic breast cancer patients as effective as combination chemotherapy? No difference in survival but higher quality of life were found in a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

To determine whether patients with high-risk metastatic breast cancer draw benefit from combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 260 women with measurable metastatic breast cancer fulfilling high-risk criteria, previously untreated with chemotherapy for their metastatic disease, were randomized to receive either mitoxantrone 12 mg/m(2) or the combination of fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) (FEC) every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until complete remission plus two cycles, or until disease progression. In the case of partial remission or stable disease, treatment was stopped after 12 cycles. Second-line treatment was vindesine, mitomycin and prednisolone. Gain from treatment was estimated using a modified Brunner's score composed of time to progression, patients' rating of the treatment benefit, alopecia, vomiting and performance status.

RESULTS

After recruitment from 1992 to 1997 and observation from 1997 to 1999, the final evaluation showed that single-agent treatment with mitoxantrone does not differ significantly from combination treatment with FEC in terms of response, objective remission rate, remission duration, time to response, time to best response, time to progression or overall survival. There was, however, a significant difference in gain from treatment using a modified Brunner's score favoring the single-agent treatment arm. There was no evidence that any subgroup would fare better with combination treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was detected between the treatment with mitoxantrone as a single agent and the combination of low-dose FEC in terms of response or survival; therefore, the imperative of the necessity of first-line combination chemotherapy for patients with high-risk metastatic breast cancer may be questioned. Since toxicity and quality of life score favored the single-agent mitoxantrone treatment arm, this treatment may be offered to patients preferring quality of life to a potential small prolongation of survival.

Standard versus intensified chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in small-cell lung cancer: a prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Lung Cancer Group Phase III Trial-08923

PURPOSE

To assess the impact on survival of increasing dose-intensity (DI) of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CDE) in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated SCLC patients were randomized to standard CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 45 mg/m(2) on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 every 3 weeks, for five cycles) or intensified CDE (cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 55 mg/m(2) on day 1, and etoposide 125 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] 5 micro g/kg/d on days 4 to 13 every 2 weeks, for four cycles). Projected cumulative dose was almost identical on the two arms, whereas projected DI was nearly 90% higher on the intensified arm. Two hundred forty-four patients were enrolled. The first 163 patients were also randomized (2 x 2 factorial design) to prophylactic antibiotics or placebo to assess their impact on preventing febrile leukopenia (FL). This report focuses on chemotherapy DI results.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 54 months, 216 deaths have occurred. Actually delivered DI on the intensified arm was 70% higher than on the standard arm. Intensified CDE was associated with more grade 4 leukopenia (79% v 50%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (44% v 11%), anorexia, nausea, and mucositis. FL and number of toxic deaths were similar on the two arms. The objective response rate was 79% for the standard arm and 84% for the intensified arm (P =.315). Median survival was 54 weeks and 52 weeks, and the 2-year survival rates were 15% and 18%, respectively (P =.885).

CONCLUSION

A 70% increase of CDE actual DI does not translate into an improved outcome in SCLC patients.

Modulations of dose intensity of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in association with G-CSF and peripheral blood stem cells in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: comparative evaluation of completion and safety of three intensive regimens

The aim of this study was to evaluate and to compare in terms of toxicity the modulations of dose intensity of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer. Four cycles of sequential high-dose chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC), supported with G-CSF and peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were administered to 81 women. Three successive cohorts were studied: doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) + cyclophosphamide (3000 mg/m(2)) every 21 days (group 1), doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) + cyclophosphamide (3000 mg/m(2)) every 15 days (group 2), and doxorubicin (75 mg/m(2)) + cyclophosphamide (6000 mg/m(2)) every 21 days (group 3). Seventy-five patients received four cycles of treatment with a total of 310 cycles administered. The received dose intensity of doxorubicin was higher in group 2 and that of cyclophosphamide was lower in group 1 than in the other two groups. Hematological and extra-hematological toxicities, as well as the number and duration of hospitalizations for toxicity, were significantly higher in group 3. We conclude that the group 3 regimen is associated with toxicities comparable to autologous transplantation. Increasing dose intensity of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide is feasible in an outpatient setting and safe in groups 1 and 2 with the support of hematopoietic factor and PBSC.

A randomised phase II study of conventional versus accelerated infusional chemotherapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) allows cycles of conventional bolus chemotherapy to be accelerated with reduction in treatment time and a boost in dose intensity. Theoretically, this approach could be hazardous with infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy, since G-CSF-stimulated neutrophil proliferation would be occurring in the face of continuous S-phase active 5-FU. We performed this phase II randomised study to compare the safety, tolerability and efficacy of conventional 3-weekly epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and continuous infusional 5-FU (infusional ECF) to an accelerated 2-weekly schedule with G-CSF support, in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients were randomised. with 14 in the accelerated arm. Patients received bolus epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (conventional arm) or every 2 weeks (accelerated arm) and 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day continuous infusion throughout. G-CSF 300 microg/day s.c. on days 10-12 was given each accelerated cycle.

RESULTS

There were no treatment delays secondary to inadequate neutrophil or platelet recovery in either arm, with higher median day 1 neutrophil counts for each cycle in the accelerated arm compared with the conventional arm. Eighty-six per cent of the planned conventional chemotherapy cycles and 82% of the planned accelerated cycles were given. There were no major differences in toxicity between the arms, with the most common grade 3 toxicities being alopecia and stomatitis. Eight patients developed neutropenic sepsis (five in the accelerated arm and three in the conventional arm). Ten patients (77%) responded in the conventional arm and nine (64%) in the accelerated arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated infusional ECF with limited G-CSF support is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen with rapid haematological recovery. A 50% increase in relative dose intensity of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide is achieved, while overall treatment time is reduced by 33%.

Impact of two different dose-intensity chemotherapy regimens on psychological distress in early breast cancer patients

In order to improve outcome, new, often more toxic chemotherapy regimens are continuously investigated in early breast cancer patients. Because the expected survival improvement is small, the possible increase in the negative effects of the new treatments should be carefully evaluated. Negative effects are represented not only by acute and chronic toxicity, but also by the adverse psychological impact of chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on patient-reported psychological distress of an increase in the dose-intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with a standard regimen. Psychological distress was evaluated at baseline, during chemotherapy and after 6 and 12 months in breast cancer patients enrolled in a phase III multicentre study comparing the standard adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil every 21 days (CEF21) with the same chemotherapy given every 14 days (CEF14). 392 patients were randomised in participating centres, and 363 were evaluable for this study. Overall, 1095 out of 1446 expected questionnaires (75.7%) were collected and evaluable. At baseline, the mean scores of psychological distress were similar in the two arms. During chemotherapy, a significantly higher psychological distress was observed in the CEF14 compared with the CEF21 arm (32.3 +/- 1.3 versus 27.6 +/- 1.3; P=0.009), as well as a higher cumulative incidence of anaemia, mucositis, diarrhoea, alopecia, bone pain and fatigue was observed in the CEF14 arm. In multivariate analyses, mucositis (P=0.01), asthenia (P=0.059), and CEF14 treatment (P=0.054) were independently associated with a higher psychological distress. After 6 months, psychological distress was again similar in the two arms and significantly lower when compared with baseline within each arm. A dose-intensive adjuvant regimen induces a higher, although transient, psychological distress in early breast cancer patients. Final results of the randomised trial will indicate whether such higher adverse effects of the dose-intensive regimen are counterbalanced by a higher efficacy of the experimental treatment in terms of survival.

Multiple cycles of dose-intensive chemotherapy with repeated stem cell support as induction treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a feasibility study

The purpose of this trial was to study feasibility and tolerance of a dose-intensive multicyclic alternating induction chemotherapy with repeated stem cell support in a series of 43 metastatic breast cancer patients. Anthracycline-naive patients (n = 21) received cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m(2) plus doxorubicin 80 mg/m(2) alternating every 14 days with paclitaxel 200-350 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 120 mg/m(2). Patients who had previously received anthracyclines (n = 22) received cisplatin 120 mg/m(2) plus etoposide 600 mg/m(2) alternating with paclitaxel 200-350 mg/m(2) plus ifosfamide 8 g/m(2). Peripheral blood stem cells were infused after every course except the first, with a median CD34(+) dose of 2.1 x 10(6)/kg per cycle. Positive selection of CD34(+) cells was performed in good mobilizers. The median number of cycles administered was six (4-8), and the time interval between them was 17 days. Median summation dose intensities (SDI) actually administered for the CA-TP and PE-TI protocol were 4.95 and 4.69, respectively (87% of scheduled SDI). There were 15 complete (35%) and 21 partial responses (49%), for an overall response rate of 84% (95% CI, 73%-95%). Infection or neutropenic fever occurred in 50% of the cycles. There was one treatment-related death. After a median follow-up of 26 months, the median event-free-survival was 12 months (95% CI: 10-14) and overall survival was 31 months. These high dose-intensity induction treatments seem to be feasible with sequential stem cell support.

Accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients: results of a multicenter, randomized phase III study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest-Mammella Inter Gruppo Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether an accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) chemotherapy regimen with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces a higher activity and efficacy compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IV breast cancer patients were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 60 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 21 days (CEF21) or accelerated-intensified CEF (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m(2), epirubicin 80 mg/m(2), and fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) administered every 14 days (HD-CEF14) with the support of G-CSF. Treatment was administered for eight cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients were randomized (74 patients on the CEF21 arm and 77 on the HD-CEF14 arm). In both arms, the median number of administered cycles was eight. The dose-intensity actually administered was 93% and 86% of that planned, in CEF21- and HD-CEF14-treated patients, respectively. Compared with the CEF21 arm, the dose-intensity increase in the HD-CEF14 arm was 80%. Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were higher in the HD-CEF14 arm than in the CEF21 arm. During chemotherapy, four deaths occurred in the HD-CEF14 arm. No difference in overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was observed: 49% and 51% in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.94). A slightly non-statistically significant higher percentage of complete response was observed in the HD-CEF14 arm (20% v 15%). No difference in efficacy was observed. The median time to progression was 14.3 and 12.8 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.69). Median overall survival was 32.7 and 27.2 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P =.16).

CONCLUSION

In metastatic breast cancer patients, an 80% increase in dose-intensity of the CEF regimen, obtained by both acceleration and dose intensification, does not improve the activity and the efficacy compared with a standard dose-intensity CEF regimen.

Dose escalation of cytotoxic drugs using haematopoietic growth factors: a randomized trial to determine the magnitude of increase provided by GM-CSF

BACKGROUND

The magnitude of chemotherapy dose escalation made possible by the use of recombinant haematopoietic growth factors has not been quantified in a randomized trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with refractory or relapsing Hodgkin's disease were randomized to receive the Dexa-BEAM regimen with escalating etoposide doses supported by placebo or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Using an adaptive sampling method independently in both arms, the etoposide dose was escalated until the maximal tolerated dose for the first cycle was reached.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were randomized to GM-CSF and thirty to placebo. The etoposide dose could be escalated considerably in both treatment arms. Maximal etoposide dose for the first cycle was 1920 mg/m2 for patients receiving GM-CSF and 1160 mg/m2 for patients receiving placebo (P = 0.045 one-sided), corresponding to a 65% higher etoposide dose and a 13% higher dose intensity with GM-CSF. Dose-limiting events were similar in both arms, consisting mainly of prolonged neutropenia and consecutive infections. Treatment efficacy was not different in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While GM-CSF permits a somewhat higher dose escalation than placebo, the increase in dose intensity provided by GM-CSF is small. The use of CSF for interval reduction rather than dose escalation is the more effective strategy for dose intensification.

The role of platelet growth factors in cancer therapy

The use of myeloid growth factors has markedly reduced the complications of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, however, abrogation of severe thrombocytopenia remains a major clinical problem. Platelet transfusions remain the standard method of preventing or treating thrombocytopenia but are associated with a variety of complications and are a limited resource. A number of cytokines have been clinically investigated for their thrombopoietic activity, the most promising of which is the recently cloned ligand to the hematopoietic growth factor receptor, c-Mpl. The c-Mpl ligand, also referred to as thrombopoietin, megakaryocyte growth and development factor (MGDF) and megapoietin, is a potent lineage-specific agent that promotes growth and maturation of megakaryocytes and their progenitors. It holds promise for clinical use in the treatment of iatrogenic or disease-associated bone marrow failure states and possibly in syndromes of excessive platelet consumption. Early clinical trials assessing the safety and activity of recombinant human MGDF are now underway.

Role of epirubicin in advanced breast cancer

Anthracyclines were first introduced for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in the 1970s and are still among the most active single agents for the treatment of this disease. Unfortunately, their clinical value is limited by late-onset ventricular dysfunction. Epirubicin, an anthracycline analogue, does not eliminate the risk of cardiotoxicity but is less cardiotoxic and myelotoxic than doxorubicin at equimolar doses, thereby allowing the safe administration of cumulative doses between 950 and 1000 mg/m2. The inclusion of epirubicin in combination regimens, such as fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC), has been shown to be safe and active as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. In the past few years, new drugs, including taxanes, have shown a high level of activity as single agents in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Doxorubicin/paclitaxel combinations have shown high overall response rates (90%) as first-line chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer; however, congestive heart failure has been reported in up to 20% of patients. Epirubicin/paclitaxel combinations have been associated with grade 3 cardiotoxicity (6%) in only one study. We report findings of a trial of combination epirubicin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer, with overall response rates (ORRs) of 84% and a complete response (CR) rate of 19%. Achieving a CR to first-line chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer appears to predict survival, and adding an active drug with a different mechanism of action and nonoverlapping toxicity might increase the percentage of CRs. We therefore tested the feasibility and activity of 6 to 8 courses of first-line treatment with a three-drug combination (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1 and 4, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 day 1, and paclitaxel 175 mg/ m2 over 3 hours on day 1) in a phase II study of 36 metastatic breast cancer patients. Treatment was well tolerated, with an ORR of 92% (95% confidence interval: 77.53%-98.25%) and a CR of 31%. In considering retreating patients who progress or relapse after receiving an anthracycline-/taxane-containing regimen with the same active drugs, epirubicin appears ideal in both the adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer settings.

Is òne cycle every three or four weeks' obsolete? A critical review of dose-dense chemotherapy in solid neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Shortening the interval between cycles is one means of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy, and can be supported by biological and mathematical rationales. Our objective was to assess the clinical relevance of the rapid repetition of regimens (so-called 'dose-dense chemotherapy') in various solid neoplasms.

DESIGN

The medical literature was reviewed in accord with Mulrow's recommendations. Randomised studies comparing frequently-repeated chemotherapy to standard regimens as well as open studies are described and critically examined.

RESULTS

Dose-dense regimens were widely found to be feasible. In small-cell lung cancer, survival of patients receiving dose-dense regimens was better than that of patients treated by standard chemotherapy in three trials, two of which reached significance, when these intensive regimens allowed better dose intensity. In poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors, a dose-dense regimen was not better than standard therapy, perhaps because of an excessively high toxicity-related death rate. However, recent phase II studies have provided encouraging results. In early breast cancer, the one published randomized study in the adjuvant setting showed only a trend towards better disease-free survival in node-positive women receiving a weekly-repeated regimen. Two randomized trials failed to show any benefit in the neoadjuvant setting with a dose-dense regimen. No evidence of a benefit was provided in metastatic breast cancer. In advanced colorectal cancer, evidence of an improvement in survival with weekly or bi-weekly 5-FU-leucovorin compared to a classic monthly schedule has recently been shown in two randomized trials, and dose-dense regimens are recognized as standard therapy in many countries. Phase II studies of dose-dense regimens have also shown high response rates and long survival in many neoplasms, including Ewing's sarcoma, gestational trophoblastic disease, ovarian carcinoma and gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable amount of experience has been gained with frequently-repeated regimens. A few randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for survival on standard chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer and advanced colorectal cancer. However, this benefit appears to be weak. The combination of dose-dense chemotherapy regimens with new anti-cancer strategies based on our insights into the mechanisms of oncogenesis is a challenge on the eve of the millennium.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the hematopoietic growth factor PIXY321 after moderate-dose fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in stage II and III breast cancer

PURPOSE

To measure the effect of PIXY321 (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/interleukin-3 S. cerevisiae fusion protein) on the incidence, duration, and complications of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia after moderate-dose fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2), and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) (FAC) chemotherapy in patients with stage II and III breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 71 women were to receive four 21-day cycles of treatment with moderate-dose FAC chemotherapy by short intravenous infusion on day 1, followed by either placebo or PIXY321 (375 microg/m(2) subcutaneously twice a day) on days 3 to 15. All patients were to receive prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin when the absolute neutrophil count was less than 1,000/microL.

RESULTS

PIXY321 significantly reduced the incidence and duration of grade 3 and grade 4 neutropenia in cycles 1 and 2 and the duration of grade 3 neutropenia in cycles 1 through 4. In cycles 3 and 4, grade 3 thrombocytopenia was significantly more common with PIXY321 (P <.05). Two patients, both in the PIXY321 group, required platelet transfusions. Fever and hospitalization for intravenous antibiotics were significantly more common in the PIXY321 group during cycle 1 only. More patients in the PIXY321 group achieved hematologic recovery by day 22 in cycles 1 through 3, and time to recovery was significantly shorter with PIXY321 in all cycles. FAC dose intensity was roughly 2% higher in the PIXY321 group (P = NS). Nonhematologic events of any intensity occurring with significantly greater overall frequency in the PIXY321 group included injection-site reactions, fever, chills, abdominal pain, and arthralgia. No patient died on study or within 30 days of her last dose of study drug.

CONCLUSION

PIXY321 decreased the incidence and duration of FAC-induced grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in cycles 1 and 2 and significantly shortened the time to hematologic recovery in all cycles. However, it produced more systemic toxicity as well as thrombocytopenia in cycles 3 and 4.

High-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide every two weeks as first-line chemotherapy for relapsing metastatic breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast cancer remains incurable with conventional chemotherapy. For any specific chemotherapy, higher dose intensity may be achieved with either increased doses per cycle, or shortened intervals between courses, or both. We demonstrate here the feasibility and encouraging results of a high-dose combination regimen administered every two weeks.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with metastatic breast cancer were treated every 14 days for 6 courses with 75 mg/m2 epirubicin and 1200 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, followed by conventionally-delivered (q 3-4 weeks) chemotherapy. The treatment was to be resumed regardless of the neutrophil count, except in instances of febrile neutropenia. Prophylactic oral antibiotherapy was given, while hematopoietic growth factors and stem cell support were not employed.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were treated between May 1986 and June 1995. Their median age was 43 years (26-69). Grade 3-4 neutrophil toxicity was observed after 86% of the courses, resulting in febrile neutropenia in 5%-18% of the patients, and the rehospitalization of 5%-10%. The median given/planned dose intensity was 97% (79-106). The objective response rate in 84 evaluable patients was 54% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 43-65), with a complete response rate of 11%, and a 14% rate of outright progression. Median progression-free survival was 16 months and median overall survival 32 months. Multivariate analysis retained previous adjuvant chemotherapy as a negative survival prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

This dose-intensive anthracycline-based regimen is feasible with manageable morbidity despite pronounced myelotoxicity, and yields encouraging survival rates.

Increasing dose intensity of cisplatin-etoposide in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a phase III randomized trial of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group

BACKGROUND

The authors designed this randomized, controlled trial to assess whether dose intensification of a cisplatin-etoposide combination (PE), achieved by shortening the interval between chemotherapy cycles, would improve response rate and survival. The maximum tolerated dose of PE was administered in either 3- or 4-week cycles to patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

One hundred twenty-three patients were randomized into two groups. The dose-intense arm received cisplatin 35 mg/m2 and etoposide 200 mg/m2 on Days 1-3 every 4 weeks. The dose-dense arm received the same schedule every 3 weeks along with 5 microg/kg of recombinant human granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) administered subcutaneously on Days 4-13.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were well balanced in both treatment arms. Fifty-four percent of patients were classified as Stage IIIB. A 32% increase in relative dose intensity was achieved in the dose-dense arm compared with the dose-intense arm. The response rates were 32% in the dose-intense arm and 27% in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.9). The median overall survival was higher in the dose-dense arm, 9 versus 7.2 months (P = 0.2). The main toxicity was myelosuppression, although the administration of GM-CSF significantly reduced the percentage of patients with Grade 4 granulocytopenia (53% vs. 78%). Fifty-four percent of the patients in the dose-intense arm and 35% of those in the dose-dense arm developed febrile neutropenia (P = 0.07). There were ten (8%) treatment-related deaths, three (4%) in the dose-intense arm and seven (12%) in the dose-dense arm (P = 0.3); three deaths in each arm were due to febrile neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose-intensification achieved in the dose-dense PE regimen did not correlate with significant improvements in response rate or survival and cannot be recommended in the light of the diversity of new drug combinations available today. However, the use of rhGM-CSF significantly reduced the incidence of severe granulocytopenia.

Tailored chemotherapy to equal toxicity: is it possible?

Conventional dosage of chemotherapy based on body surface area in patients with normal organ functions will result in marked interindividual variations in systemic exposure to the cytostatics used. This will result in over- and undertreatment of the individual patient associated with unwarranted toxicity and suboptimal outcome. The intention to modify dosage is motivated by a possible correlation between toxicity and outcome. New dosage strategies with individual tailoring of the therapy should be investigated with the aim of increasing the efficacy of therapy without increasing its toxicity. Pharmacokinetic monitoring using the limited sampling procedure could be one alternative, another toxicity-guided dosage. The dosage scheme used for tailored FEC polychemotherapy (six dose levels), based on therapy to equivalent haematological toxicity, has been clinically applicable in the multicentre setting for both adjuvant and preoperative therapy. In the adjuvant setting it has resulted in the delivery of significantly higher epirubicin and cyclophosphamide doses without increasing acute toxicity to the same extent; in two out of three patients no difference in acute toxicity could be verified for the highest two dose levels compared with the lower dose levels. In short, we could obtain better results with our present arsenal of cytostatics if we used them better.

EPOETINA ALFA NEI TUMORI DEL POLMONE

There is a high frequency of hematopoietic abnormalities in patients with neoplastic disorders, anemia being one of the most common and important, especially in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. A number of factors are able to affect the incidence and severity of chemotherapy-induced anemia: the type of chemotherapy, chemotherapy dose-intensity, chemotherapy duration, prior treatment, baseline Hb value and entity of Hb decrease during chemotherapy. An impaired erythroid marrow response to erythropoietin (EPO) and reduced EPO levels in response to anemia may contribute to the development of this form of anemia in lung cancer patients. Recombinant human EPO has been successfully used in the treatment of anemia. EPO increases the red cells mass and eliminates by approximately 50% the need for blood transfusions in patients with chronic anemia of cancer. EPO is also effective in the prevention of anemia of cancer patients. Besides increasing the levels of hemoglobin, EPO is also able to significantly improve the quality of life and performance status of anemic patients with cancer. EPO is well tolerated and the only drawbacks are represented by its cost and the need for a prolonged parenteral treatment. The use of EPO can be optimized by taking into consideration some predicting factors, by modulating the dose and by using iron support. In patients with lung cancer, the objective of EPO treatment may vary from palliation to survival improvement according to stage, type of antineoplastic treatment and prognosis. To take maximum advantage from its efficacy, EPO treatment in lung cancer patients needs to be individualized by identifying for each patient the risk of severe anemia and the objective of treatment.

Myeloprotective Effect of Early Primary Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor during Six Courses of Intensified 5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide (120FEC) Chemotherapy for Advanced Breast Cancer

Aims and background

The neutropenia induced by six courses of an intensified FEC regimen is expected to be checked by early primary administration of G-CSF which is stopped eight days before the next chemotherapy course. Less information is available about megakaryocytic and erythroid toxicity over six courses.

Methods and study design

Sixty-six consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer completed six courses of a randomized treatment with two FEC regimens adminstered every 21 days, in which 600 mg/m2 of cyclophosphamide and 5-FU was associated with 60 or 120 mg/m2 of epirubicin (60FEC, 35 patients, vs 120FEC, 31 patients). 120FEC was supported by early primary G-CSF (days 4 to 13). Blood counts were obtained seven times during each course.

Results

The non-hematologic toxicity over 364 courses was similar in 60FEC and 120FEC. No cumulative hematologic toxicity was observed for white blood cells (WBC) and platelets (PLT), while for hemoglobin (Hb) a somewhat higher cumulative toxicity was observed with 120FEC than with 60FEC. WBC, PLT and Hb grade III-IV toxicity occurred in 40.1% and 45.6% (P=ns), in 23.1% and 0.8% (P <.0001) and in 15.6% and 3.0% (P <.005) of the two regimens, respectively. There were no febrile or hemorrhagic episodes. The epirubicin relative dose intensity delivered was 1.95 in 120FEC with respect to 60FEC.

Conclusions

Our G-CSF schedule permitted to deliver six courses of 120FEC without any clinically relevant side effects. Grade III-IV leukopenia was similar with 120FEC and 60FEC, while grade III-IV thrombocytopenia and anemia occurred more often with 120FEC than with 60FEC.

A dose finding study for the combination of epidoxorubicin and vinorelbine, delivered every two weeks with G-CSF support, in advanced breast cancer

The aim of this study was to find the maximum tolerated dose of epidoxorubicin as part of a regimen with vinorelbine at the dose of 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 5, every 2 weeks in patients with advanced breast cancer. The optimal dose intensity of the two drugs was supported by administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on days 7-12. Patients were treated with epidoxorubicin at three different dose levels (50-65-80 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle). No dose limiting toxicity was observed in the first three patients (treated at the dose of 50 mg/m2). We observed one case of dose limiting toxicity out of the 6 patients treated with 65 mg/m2 and 3/3 cases among patients treated with 80 mg/m2. We conclude that 65 mg/m2 is the maximum tolerated dose of epidoxorubicin in this regimen, which is also able to maintain adequate dose intensities.

Dose intensification of epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer: a randomised study with two schedules of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor

A randomised phase II/III study was conducted in patients with advanced breast cancer to determine the dose intensity achievable through an acceleration of administration of chemotherapy with epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) alone, as compared with the combination of this regimen with two different schedules of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF). 73 patients received EC intravenous (i.v.) (epidoxorubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) on day 1 (group A), or the same chemotherapy plus sub-cutaneous (s.c.) GM-CSF (5 micrograms/kg/day) either from days 3 to 12 (group B) or from days -6 to -3 (group C). The primary objective of the study was the investigation of dose intensity delivered in the three treatment arms, whereas the secondary objective was response rate. A significant increase (P = 0.006) in dose intensity of 21% was observed for treatment group B, whereas the increase in dose intensity achieved in group C (7%) was not significant (P = 0.086). Response rates (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)) of 56% were observed in group A, 65% in group B, and 57% in group C, respectively. This difference in response rates did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.271). We thus conclude that an acceleration of the EC regimen over the standard schedule could be accomplished with postchemotherapeutic GM-CSF support, leading to an increase in dose intensity, whereas pretherapeutic short-term GM-CSF administration did not reach this goal.

Comparison of cytokines in children with recurrent solid tumors treated with intensive chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To compare the relative hematopoietic protective effects of recombinant human interleukin-1alpha (rhuIL-1alpha), recombinant human granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF), and PIXY321, a genetically engineered fusion protein combining interleukin-3 and rhuGM-CSF, in children with refractory solid tumors after treatment with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 53 children who had not responded to at least one earlier chemotherapy regimen were enrolled on consecutive trials of ICE chemotherapy alone (n = 14) or with rhuGM-CSF (n = 8), rhuIL-1alpha (n = 10), or PIXY321 (n = 21). The relative hematopoietic effects of these three cytokines were compared retrospectively to each other and to values for patients who received ICE alone. Because one cannot assume that hematopoietic toxicity and response to a given cytokine are independent of the course of chemotherapy, the analysis was restricted to the first treatment course.

RESULTS

In this retrospective comparison, 1000 microg/m2/day of rhuGM-CSF reduced the median duration of grade 4 neutropenia (<500/microL) from a median of 17 days (range 3 to 34) in children who received ICE alone to 9 days (range 5 to 11, p = 0.003); it appeared to have a beneficial effect on severe thrombocytopenia (<20,000/microL), reducing the median duration from 4.5 days with ICE alone to 3 days (p = 0.08) and the number of platelet transfusions from a median of 5.75 transfusions (range 0 to 13) to 0 in these two cohorts. No significant improvement in these measures was seen with rhuIL-1alpha or PIXY321.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that 1000 microg/m2/day of rhuGM-CSF has clinically significant effects on platelet recovery and more effectively ameliorates thrombocytopenia and neutropenia than either rhuIL-1alpha or PIXY321 in the context of ICE chemotherapy. Further dose-intensification will require a combination of cytokines; the optimal dose and combination of these agents awaits further study.

Continuous infusion or subcutaneous injection of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: increased efficacy and reduced toxicity when given subcutaneously

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a haematopoietic growth factor with a wide variety of applications in the clinic. In early phase I studies the continuous intravenous (c.i.) route of administration was often used. Later it was shown that subcutaneous (s.c.) administration was also effective. The optimal route of administration remains, however, poorly defined, and no studies have made a direct comparison between these two routes of administration. We treated patients with advanced breast cancer with moderately high-dose doxorubicin and cylophosphamide and GM-CSF. The first 14 patients received GM-CSF by c.i, while subsequently 47 patients received it s.c. Comparison between the two groups showed that c.i. GM-CSF was more toxic in several respects. There was a higher need for erythrocyte and platelet transfusions and a significant deterioration in the performance status. This study indicates that subcutaneous GM-CSF is the preferred route of administration. Randomised trials are, however, needed to confirm these conclusions.

Phase I study of simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration of cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with small-cell lung cancer

A phase I study was designed to assess whether dose intensity of an 'accelerated' cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide (CDE) regimen plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could be increased further, in an outpatient setting, by escalating the dose of each single drug of the regimen. Patients with previously untreated small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) received escalating doses of cyclophosphamide (C) 1100-1300 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, doxorubicin (D) 50-60 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide (E) 110-130 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3 and every 14 days for at least three courses. Along with chemotherapy, G-CSF (filgastrim) 5 micrograms kg-1 from day 5 to day 11 was administered subcutaneously (s.c.) to all patients. Twenty-five patients were enrolled into the study. All patients at the first dose level (C 1100, D 50, E 110 x 3) completed three or more cycles at the dose and schedule planned by the protocol and no 'dose-limiting toxicity' (DLT) was seen. At the second dose level (C 1200, D 55, E 120 x 3) three out of five patients had a DLT consisting of 'granulocytopenic fever' (GCPF). Another six patients were treated at this dose level with the addition of ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice a day and only two patients had a DLT [one episode of documented oral candidiasis and one of 'fever of unknown origin' (FUO) with generalised mucositis]. Accrual of patients proceeded to the third dose level (C 1300, D 60, E 130 x 3) with the prophylactic use of ciprofloxacin. Four out of six patients experienced a DLT consisting of GCPF or documented non-bacterial infection. Accrual of patients at the third dose level was then resumed adding to ciprofloxacin anti-fungal prophylaxis (fluconazole 100 mg daily) and anti-viral prophylaxis (acyclovir 800 mg twice a day) from day 5 to 11. Out of five patients treated three experienced a DLT consisting of severe leucopenia and fever or infection. With a simultaneous dose escalation and schedule acceleration it is indeed possible to take maximum advantage of G-CSF activity and to increase CDE dose intensity by a factor 1.65-1.80 for a maximum of 3-4 courses. The role of antimicrobial prophylaxis in this setting deserves to be investigated further.

Dose-intensive chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and GM-CSF fails to improve survival of metastatic breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

A dose response relationship for doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide has been suggested. In a previous dose finding study we treated advanced breast cancer patients with escalating doses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in combination with GM-CSF. The aim of this study is to further define the acute and cumulative toxicity of this treatment in relation to its antitumor activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with doxorubicin (90 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2) at 3-week intervals. Dose reductions of 10% were applied in the second and fourth cycles. On the second day GM-CSF was started at 250 mu g/m2 daily for 10 days. The intention was to give 6 cycles, but when a complete remission was reached earlier only one more cycle was given as consolidation.

RESULTS

The median number of cycles was 5 (range 2-6). Twenty-three patients responded (82%, 95% CI 69%-97%), with 9 of them achieving a complete response (32%, 95% CI 14%-50%). For the 18 patients evaluable for time to progression and survival the median time to progression was 8 months and the median survival 14.5 months. Toxicity was substantial: grades 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 95% of cycles and grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 49% of cycles. Grade 3-4 mucositis was present in 13% of the cycles. Weakness and fatigue were always present and were cumulative. Four patients had a decline in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). These side effects were the reason for discontinuing therapy in 9 of the 28 patients (32%).

CONCLUSION

This treatment has a high response rate in comparison with conventional-dose chemotherapy but does not prolong time to progression or survival. The toxicity makes this protocol unsuitable for use as palliative treatment.

Cell kinetics of CD34-positive hematopoietic cells following chemotherapy plus colony-stimulating factors in advanced breast cancer

Bone-marrow (BM) hematopoietic precursors are recruited into proliferative activity when colony-stimulating factors (CSF) are sequenced with chemotherapy (CT). Previous studies suggested that further CT can be safely administered only when the increased proliferative activity of these cells has subsided, because most cytostatic drugs selectively damage cycling cells. The safest interval between CSF discontinuation and the start of the next CT course needs to be ascertained in vivo. Thirty patients with advanced breast cancer were treated with an intensified FEC regimen, planned at 21-day intervals, sequenced with granulocyte-macrophage (GM)-CSF (15 patients) or granulocyte (G)-CSF (15 patients). Using flow cytometry (FCM) we evaluated the proliferation kinetics of CD34+ BM hematopoietic progenitors before CT+CSF and at different times after CSF administration was stopped. FEC+GM- and FEC+G-CSF sequences both induced a rapid and sustained increase in the percentage of BM myeloid precursors (BMMP%) and in the cycling status of CD34+BM cells. However, while the BMMP% remained elevated in both cases after CSF were stopped, the enhanced proliferative activity of CD34+ cells decreased more rapidly after GM- than after G-CSF. Using FCM, CD34+ BM-derived hematopoietic presursor cell kinetics is readily evaluated in the clinical setting. The administration of CSF following CT increases both the proliferative activity of CD34+ BM cells and the BMMP%. After CSF were discontinued a kinetic refractoriness of hematopoietic progenitors was more evident after GM-CSF than after G-CSF. These data may be of value in designing clinical trials to avoid cytostatic damage to the BM hematopoietic stem-cell compartment.

Accelerated chemotherapy with high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide plus r-met-HUG-CSF in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the toxicity of high-dose epirubicin and cyclophosphamide plus r-met-HUG-CSF (G-CSF) given every 2 weeks and compared the dose-intensity achieved with this schedule with that obtained in a previous study we conducted in which the same regimen was given every 3 weeks without G-SCF (EC 21). The secondary objective was to explore the activity of this regimen.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between December 1991 and March 1994, 41 patients (pts), 19 with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and 22 with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), were given high-dose epirubicin (Hd-Epi) (120 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) (600 mg/m2) on day 1 every 14 days (EC 14) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (5 mcg/kg/d s.c. on days 2-12). A total of 8 cycles in LABC pts (4 pre- and post-surgery), and 6-8 cycles in MCB pts were administered. The results were compared with those obtained in the previous study.

RESULTS

The incidence of WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly reduced in the EC 14 + G-CSF regimen (25.2% vs. 46.8% in 214 and 250 evaluable cycles, respectively, p<0.0001), as well as the incidence of neutropenic fever (7% vs. 3%, p=0.05). Grade 3-4 anemia (36.6% vs. 8% pts, p=0.001) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (17.1% vs. 0 pts, p=0.002), were significantly more frequent in EC 14 + G-CSF. No significant differences in the other side effects were found. A total of 17 of 207 of the cycles (8.2%) were delayed in the EC 14 + G-CSF vs. 58/271 (21.4%) in the EC 21 (p<0.0001). The main reasons for these treatment delays were neutropenia (1% vs. 15%), anemia (3% vs. 0) and thrombocytopenia (1% vs. 0). As a result of treatment acceleration and differences in dose delays, the patients on EC 14 + G-CSF received a higher dose-intensity (Epi 58.51 mg/m2/wk vs. 36.8 mg/m2/wk; CTX 292.52 mg/m2/wk vs. 182.9 mg/m2/wk). A complete response at surgery was obtained in 9/19 (47.4%) LABC pts. An objective CR was obtained in 11/22 MBC pts (50%) and a partial response in 8/22 (36.4%), yielding an overall response rate of 86.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Hd-Epi + CTX is very active against both LABC and MBC. The administration of G-CSF allows dose intensification of both drugs (a 59.5% increase of the actual dose intensity) with acceptable clinical tolerance (a lower incidence of neutropenia but a higher incidence of anemia and thrombocytopenia). Only a specifically designed phase III trial will lead to definitive conclusions regarding the greater antitumor activity of accelerated CSF-including regimens as compared to standard chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

An EORTC pilot study of filgrastim (recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor) as support to a high dose-intensive epiadriamycin-cyclophosphamide regimen in chemotherapy-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

In an attempt to increase chemotherapy dose intensity by step-wise reduction of the time interval between treatment cycles, filgrastim was administered to breast cancer patients receiving a three-month combination chemotherapy with epirubicin (E) and cyclophosphamide (C).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer received fixed doses of E (120 mg/m2) and C 9830 mg/m2) by 15-min i.v. infusion on day 1 of each cycle and filgrastim at a dose of 4 micrograms/kg once daily by SC injection starting 24 hours after chemotherapy. Cohorts of patients were treated in successive schedules, each schedule corresponding to a specified time interval between chemotherapy cycles. The toxicity observed in each schedule was evaluated before patients were accrued to the next schedule, which corresponded to a shorter time interval between chemotherapy cycles.

RESULTS

The maximum tolerated schedule was E (120 mg/m2) plus C 9830 mg/m2) given every 14 days with filgrastim support from day 2 until day 13. On this schedule, 5 of 12 patients experienced dose-intensity-limiting toxicities (DLT) during the 3-month study period. Non-hematological DLT occurred in 2/12 patients (mucositis, skin toxicity) while /312 experienced febrile neutropenia requiring i.v. antibiotics. All patients achieved recovery of ANC to >1.5 x 10(9)/l by the time of scheduled retreatment. The combination of filgrastim with this regimen did not seem to add major toxicities. The efficacy was high, with 87% of patients achieving an objective response and a median response duration of 18 months (range: 4-52 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Filgrastim permits at 33% increase in 'EC' dose intensification over that of the conventional every-3-week administration. Randomized studies should now be initiated to evaluate the merit, if any, of 'accelerated' chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.

Phase I study of accelerated FEC with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Lenograstim) support

With the aim of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy in breast cancer, 14 patients with stage II-IV breast cancer were treated with FEC chemotherapy at 2 week intervals together with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 micrograms kg-1 s.c. on days 2-14. Five of six patients completed six courses of 5-fluorouracil 600 mg m-2, epirubicin 60 mg m-2 and cylcophosphamide 600 mg m-2 within 11 weeks. Eight patients were treated with 5-fluorouracil 700 mg m-2, epirubicin 70 mg m-2 and cyclophosphamide 700 mg m-2 and four had dose-limiting toxicity with sepsis, thrombocytopenia or mucositis. All patients who received G-CSF had satisfactory neutrophil counts by day 15 of each course. Cumulative anaemia and thrombocytopenia were observed, but treatment at the first dose was tolerable. Seven of eight patients with measurable disease had partial responses. This regimen permits a 50% increase in dose intensity compared with conventional treatment at 3 week intervals and warrants further evaluation.

Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on hematologic toxicity induced by high-dose chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Twenty patients with recurrent metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose myelosuppressive antineoplastic drugs (cyclophosphamide 2.5 g/m2 or epirubicin 130 mg/m2, both every 3 weeks) as first or second line chemotherapy were randomized in a prospective study to GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg per day (n = 11) or control (n = 9). Significant reduction in granulocyte nadir duration (2 days with GM-CSF vs. 7 days) and severity (0.4 x 10(9)/l with GM-CSF vs. 0.2 x 10(9)/l) was found. No difference in frequency of neutropenic fever or antibiotic use could be observed. Even though the patients treated with GM-CSF at random were more heavily pretreated with chemotherapy, there was a surprisingly higher response rate in these patients as compared to the control-arm, namely 64% vs. 28.5%. However, this difference was not statistically significant. No severe side-effects were seen, but presumably due to GM-CSF one patient developed an allergic type 1 reaction and one patient a possible pericardial exudation. Both were fully reversible after cessation of the cytokine treatment.

Release of peripheral blood progenitor cells during standard dose cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil regimen plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor for breast cancer therapy

BACKGROUND

High dose chemotherapy with the support of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) is increasingly used in the treatment of solid tumors. Although the best method of PBPC mobilization is still under investigation, it should be optimized for different tumor types to obtain antitumor effect and mobilizing activity. The authors report these results in terms of the number of PBPC released and the time of maximum mobilization induced by standard dose cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil (CEF) (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2) plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Peripheral blood progenitor cells were studied by clonogenic assay of granulocyte macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM), megakaryocyte colony-forming unit (CFU-Meg) and erythrocyte burst-forming unit (BFU-E) and by flow cytometric analysis of CD34+ cells in 12 patients with early breast cancer throughout three cycles of CEF chemotherapy plus G-CSF.

RESULTS

Colony assays and CD34+ cell determination were performed on 111 and 151 blood samples, respectively. The peak of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells occurred consistently at day 11 throughout all three cycles. At day 11 of the first cycle, the median peak values were 2223 CFU-GM/mL and 256 CD34+ cells/microL. A progressive decrease in peak value from the first to the third cycle was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard dose CEF chemotherapy plus G-CSF is a disease specific regimen allowing PBPC mobilization without any relevant toxicity. Maximum mobilization was recorded at day 11 of the first cycle.