Collection of circulating progenitor cells after epirubicin, paclitaxel and filgrastim in patients with metastatic breast cancer

Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel following mobilization with epirubicin and cisplatin are feasible but ineffective in treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

We verified the feasibility of a multi-cycle peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC)-supported high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The HDC regimen consisted of a single course of high-dose epirubicin given in combination with cisplatin plus filgrastim, followed by three courses of high doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel with PBPC reinfusion and filgrastim. Of the 16 enrolled patients, 13 provided an adequate number of PBPCs by a single leukapheresis, while in the three needed two procedures, with a median number of CD34+, CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38- cells collected per patient was 13.5 x 10(6), 10.9 x 10(6) and 0.9 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. No toxic death occurred, and the collected PBPCs supported a rapid hematopoietic reconstitution after HDC; however, seven patients early interrupted the treatment early due to early progressive disease (n=4) or prolonged grade 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (n=3). Despite an overall response rate of 42%, the median survival for stage IV patients has been 5 months (range: 1-25+). Of two patients with stage IIIB NSCLC, one is continuously disease-free at 71+ months, while of 14 with stage IV disease, one is currently alive with disease at 25+ months. In conclusion, the combination of high-dose epirubicin with cisplatin plus filgrastim is an effective regimen in releasing large amounts of PBPCs, which can then be safely employed to support multiple courses of HDC. Multiple cycles of PBPC-supported high-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel are ineffective in treating patients with advanced NSCLC.

High dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support for solid tumors other than breast cancer in adults

Since the early 1980s high dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem cell support was adopted by many oncologists as a potentially curative option for solid tumors, supported by a strong rationale from laboratory studies and apparently convincing results of early phase II studies. As a result, the number and size of randomized trials comparing this approach with conventional chemotherapy initiated (and often abandoned before completion) to prove or disprove its value was largely insufficient. In fact, with the possible exception of breast carcinoma, the benefit of a greater escalation of dose of chemotherapy with stem cell support in solid tumors is still unsettled and many oncologists believe that this approach should cease. In this article, we critically review and comment on the data from studies of high dose chemotherapy so far reported in adult patients with small cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer, germ cell tumors and sarcomas.

Dose-dense vinorelbine and paclitaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer patients: anti-tumor activity and peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization capability

We studied the safety, activity and peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilizing capability of a dose-dense combination of vinorelbine (VNB) and paclitaxel (PTX) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Forty-three MBC patients were submitted to four cycles of VNB 30 mg/m2 and PTX 175 mg/m2 intravenously, every 2 weeks, as the first induction step of a tandem high-dose chemotherapy program. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg was administered daily from day +5 to +10 in order to accelerate hematopoietic recovery, or 48h after the last VNB-PTX when a leukapheresis was planned (after the third or fourth cycle). A total of 172 cycles were administered. The mean delivered dose-intensity of VNB and PTX was 14.7 and 86 mg/m2/week, respectively (98% of the planned dose-intensity). The main per-patient toxicities were: peripheral neurotoxicity (G1/2 60%, G3 5%), constipation (G1/2 10%), oral mucositis (G1/2 20%), and asthenia (G1/2 35%). Hematological toxicity was unremarkable, except for anemia with hemoglobin (Hb) values < 10 g/dl (28%), and lymphopenia with lymphocyte counts < 1000/mm3 (28%). Two complete (5.1%) and 24 partial (61.5%) responses were observed in 39 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of 66.6% (95% CI 51.6-80.9). A median of one apheretic procedure (range 1-3) was required to achieve the target number of 6 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells. The median number of CD34+ harvested per patient was 15 x 10(6)/kg (range 6.4-36.5). Four cycles of dose dense VNB and PTX showed a favorable toxicity profile, a relevant anti-tumor activity and a high peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilizing activity.

High-dose epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane, given in combination with paclitaxel plus filgrastim provides an effective mobilizing regimen to support three courses of high-dose dense chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II-IIIA breast cancer

SUMMARY

We verified the possibility of collecting large amounts of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) to support three courses of adjuvant high-dose dense chemotherapy (HDDC) with high-dose epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane, and high-dose paclitaxel, in patients with high-risk breast cancer (>/=9 positive nodes). The mobilizing regimen consisted of high-dose epirubicin 150 mg/m(2), preceded by dexrazoxane 1000 mg/m(2) (day 1), given in combination with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 2), plus filgrastim. Of the 25 patients enrolled, one went off study due to a severe hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel, another did not undergo leukapheresis due to fever persistent after hematological recovery, while in 23 patients an adequate number of PBSCs was collected by a single leukapheresis. The median number of CD34+, CD34+/CD33-, and CD34+/CD38- cells collected per patient was 17 x 10(6)/kg, 13.4 x 10(6)/kg, and 1.5 x 10(6)/kg, respectively. Neutropenia was the only grade 4 toxicity and lasted a median of 3 days. High-dose epirubicin, preceded by dexrazoxane for the first time used in mobilizing regimen, and paclitaxel plus filgrastim are effective in releasing large amounts of PBSCs, which can then be safely employed to support multiple courses of HDDC.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy preceding apheresis of peripheral blood progenitor cells can affect the early reconstitution phase of naive T cells after autologous transplantation

Transient T cell immunodeficiency is a common complication following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In breast cancer patients transplanted with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) harvested after cytotoxic treatment with either cyclophosphamide or epirubicin plus paclitaxel, we evaluated T cells infused in grafts and in peripheral blood during the early reconstitution phase. We found that PBPC grafts harvested after treatment with epirubicin plus paclitaxel contained substantially larger numbers of T cells with less altered composition than after cyclophosphamide. Three months after high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy, the numbers and the kinetics of circulating naive T cells, but not of memory and CD28- T cells, correlated positively with the number of naive T cells infused PBPC grafts. Finally, retrospective analysis of two cohorts of patients transplanted in different clinical settings with PBPC grafts harvested following cyclophosphamide or epirubicin plus paclitaxel showed apparently different susceptibilities to develop endogenous varicella zoster virus reactivation in the first year after high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy. On the whole, these data indicate that number and composition of T cells in PBPC grafts vary according to the former cytotoxic therapy, and suggest that autologous transfer of T cells may accelerate the early T cell reconstitution phase and possibly ameliorate immune competence in patients rendered lymphopenic by high-dose chemotherapy.

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells with paclitaxel and rhG-CSF in high-risk breast cancer patients

Preclinical studies have demonstrated the rapid and efficient mobilization of hematopoietic peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) in a mouse model using the combination of paclitaxel with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF). On the basis of these results, a clinical trial was initiated using rhG-CSF with paclitaxel for PBSC mobilization in high-risk breast cancer patients. The mobilized PBSC were evaluated for CD34(+) cell number, mononuclear cell content, and clonogenic potential. One-hundred and seventeen breast cancer patients received paclitaxel (300 mg/m(2)) administered as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion. Forty-eight hours after completing paclitaxel, rhG-CSF (5 microg/kg) was initiated and continued until completion of PBSC collection. Leukapheresis was initiated once the white blood cell count reached 1.0 x 10(9)/L. Each collection was evaluated for the numbers of mononuclear cells (MNC) and CD34(+) cells. Clonogenic potential was enumerated using colony-forming units-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E). Patients receiving paclitaxel with rhG-CSF mobilized a large number of mononuclear cells/apheresis (mean, 3.7 x 10(8); range, 3.3-4.1) and CD34(+) cells/apheresis (mean, 7.2 x 10(6); range, 6.1-8.4). The average number of leukophereses needed was 1.8 (mean, range 1.6-2.0). Colony growth was normal with 178.9 x 10(5) and 214.8 x 10(5) colonies counted in CFU-GM and BFU-E assays, respectively. Patients engrafted platelets and neutrophils on day 10 following transplantation. In conclusion, PBSC mobilization with paclitaxel and rhG-CSF results in a large number of mononuclear cells and CD34(+) cells with normal clonogenic potential. The cells engraft normally following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in high-risk breast cancer patients. These results demonstrate that paclitaxel with rhG-CSF is an efficient mobilizing agent in high-risk breast cancer patients.

A phase II trial of docetaxel for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization for patients with breast cancer and ovarian cancer

As docetaxel is known to have significant antineoplastic activity against breast and ovarian cancer, we explored its application as a peripheral blood stem cell mobilizing agent in 33 women with stage lll-IV ovarian carcinoma (n = 10) or stage ll-lV breast cancer (n = 23) who were in preparation for high-dose chemotherapy. Eleven patients had bone and/or bone marrow involvement with their disease. The median number of prior regimens received before mobilization was two (range 1-3). The three dose levels administered were 100 mg/m(2), 110 mg/m(2) and 120 mg/m(2). Patients received one dose of docetaxel in the outpatient setting followed by G-CSF (10 microg/kg/day) starting 4 days after docetaxel administration. Leukapheresis commenced when WBC >1.0 x 10(9)/l or when the WBC began to rise after reaching a nadir. Ninety-seven percent of patients began leukapheresis within 7-9 days after receiving docetaxel (range 7-10 days). The collection goal was >/=2 x 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg. Twenty-seven (82%) patients reached this goal in a median of 2 leukapheresis days (range 1-3). No grade 2-4 nonhematologic toxicities were noted. Thirteen patients (55%) showed a WBC nadir >1.0 x 10(9)/l. None of the patients experienced neutropenic fever or required blood or platelet transfusion support. In conclusion, docetaxel + G-CSF is an effective, well-tolerated regimen for PBPC mobilization which can be safely administered in the outpatient setting with minimal toxicity.

Use of paclitaxel in patients with pre-existing cardiomyopathy: a review of our experience

Cardiac toxicity is frequently the indication for discontinuation of an anthracycline in patients with tumors which remain anthracycline-sensitive. During the 1990s, the most frequently used second-line agents at the Yale Cancer Center (YCC) were the taxanes. The goal of this retrospective analysis was to determine the effect of paclitaxel on cardiac function in patients with cardiomyopathy. YCC outpatient clinic pharmacy order forms were used to identify all patients who had received paclitaxel between December 1995 and November 1997. The clinic records of those patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < or = 50% were reviewed to determine the temporal relation between the decreased LVEF and paclitaxel therapy. In addition, clinic records were examined for evidence of prior doxorubicin therapy and history of prior cardiac disease. Between December 1995 and November 1997, 225 patients were treated with paclitaxel in the YCC outpatient clinic. Nine patients had LVEF < or = 50% (mean 37%) prior to initiation of paclitaxel therapy. Six of these patients had equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiographic (ERNA) scans following completion of paclitaxel. In these 6 patients, the mean change in LVEF was +6% (range -3% to +29%). Four patients had improved LVEF following paclitaxel (mean 11%, range 2% to 29%), while 2 patients experienced a decrease in LVEF following paclitaxel treatment (mean 2.5%). The 3 patients who did not have ERNA scans following paclitaxel therapy had no clinical evidence of congestive heart failure. Our experience confirms the results of prior studies that paclitaxel can be safely administered in patients with underlying cardiac dysfunction.

Kinetics of PBPC mobilization by cyclophosphamide, as compared with that by epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by G-CSF support: implications for optimal timing of PBPC harvest

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available on the mobilization kinetics of autologous PBPCs after induction with various chemotherapy regimens. With PBPC mobilization in patients with breast cancer used as a model for chemotherapy-induced PBPC recruitment, the kinetics of progenitor cells mobilized either with cyclophosphamide (CY) or epirubicin/paclitaxel (EPI-TAX) followed by the administration of G-CSF was compared.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The study included a total of 86 patients with breast cancer (stage II-IV) receiving either CY (n = 39) or EPI-TAX (n = 47), both followed by G-CSF support. The progenitor cell content in peripheral blood and apheresis components was monitored by flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ cells. PBPC collection was started when the threshold of >20 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per L of peripheral blood was reached.

RESULTS

The PBPC collection was begun a median of 9 days after the administration of EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF support, as compared to a median of 13 days after mobilization with CY plus G-CSF. After treatment with CY, the total numbers of PBPCs peaked on Day 1 of apheresis, and they rapidly declined thereafter. In contrast, treatment with EPI-TAX followed by G-CSF administration led to a steady mobilization of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. The difference in the mobilization patterns with CY and EPI-TAX resulted in a greater yield of CD34+ cells per L of processed blood volume. Compared to EPI-TAX, mobilization with CY required the overall processing of 30 percent less whole-blood volume to reach the target yield of > or = 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight. After a median of three apheresis procedures, however, both CY+G-CSF and EPI-TAX+G-CSF were equally effective in obtaining this target yield.

CONCLUSION

These results imply that specific PBPC mobilization as part of a given chemotherapy regimen should be taken into consideration before the planning of a PBPC harvest.

Paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin is less effective for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC). Twenty-seven patients with gynecological cancer received paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP, n = 9) or other platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 18) (etoposide and cisplatin [n = 5]; cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and cisplatin [n = 8]; or pepleomycin, etoposide, and cysplatin [n = 5]). Each combination was followed by G-CSF. The mean number of colony-forming unit granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM)/kg and CD34+ cells/kg collected per cycle was 1.2 x 105 and 0.8 x 106 after the TP regimen, compared with 2.6 x 105 (P < 0.05) and 2.0 x 106 for patients who received other platinum-based chemotherapy. The CFU-GM target yield (>/=1.0 x 105/kg) was achieved in 56% and 83% patients in the TP and comparison group, respectively. With the TP regimen, a younger age (</=50 years of age) and fewer prior chemotherapy cycles (</=2) were associated with the CFU-GM targeted yield (<0.05). In conclusion, TP mobilized PBPC less effectively than other platinum-based chemotherapy. Therefore, the TP regimen may need to be changed to another appropriate regimen when PBPC mobilization is planned for high-dose chemotherapy in gynecological cancer patients.

Negative immunomagnetic purging of peripheral blood stem cell harvests from breast carcinoma patients reduces tumor cell contamination while not affecting hematopoietic recovery

BACKGROUND

Because tumor contamination of hematopoietic stem cell grafts may influence the outcome in breast carcinoma (BC) patients undergoing high dose chemotherapy (HDC), several ex vivo procedures for the purging of autologous harvests have been investigated. The authors studied the presence of epithelial tumor cells and the growth of hematopoietic progenitors in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections from patients with metastatic breast carcinoma before and after a purging procedure performed by a negative immunomagnetic BC cell separation.

METHODS

Eighteen patients entered the study. Tumor contamination was assessed by conventional immunocytochemistry (ICC) and by a liquid culture assay developed in the study laboratory. Committed and more primitive hematopoietic progenitors were quantitated before and after the negative selection. Ten patients received HDC with purged PBSC support.

RESULTS

Before purging, 4 of 18 PBSC collections were found to be contaminated by liquid culture; among these samples, only 1 was positive by ICC. Three of the four positive collections, including the ICC positive sample, became negative after immunomagnetic selection whereas BC cells still were present after the procedure in one harvest. A high recovery of both primitive and mature hematopoietic progenitors was found after the purging procedure. Patients receiving purged PBSC after myeloablation had a prompt and complete hematopoietic reconstitution, and no graft failure was observed at a median follow-up of 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The preliminary results of the current study suggest that negative selection of BC cells is able to purge PBSC effectively while having no apparent affect on hematopoietic progenitor recovery in vitro and in vivo.

Four-day infusion of fluorouracil plus vinorelbine as salvage treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer

AIMS

Anthracyclines-taxanes containing regimens are widely used for breast cancer treatment both in neoadjuvant-adjuvant setting and in metastatic disease. Recently high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous stem cell support has been introduced as adjuvant treatment for high-risk primary breast cancer and for selected subsets of women with metastatic disease. Therefore, salvage treatment for previously treated patients with progressive disease becomes even more problematic. A regimen of continuous infusion of fluorouracil (FU) and vinorelbine (VNR) has been evaluated in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight women, median age 52 years, with previously treated breast cancer entered the study. All but one received more than one line of prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Furthermore 14 women had undergone HDC with peripheral blood progenitor cells transplantation in adjuvant setting (6 pts), or metastatic disease (8 pts). Treatment consisted of four-day infusion of FU (1000 mg/m2/day) plus VNR (20 mg/m2/i.v. day 1 and 5), recycled every 3 weeks for a total of six courses. Drugs administration was discontinued for G4 toxicity, tumor progression or patient's refusal.

RESULTS

Twenty PR and four CR for an overall response rate of 50% (95%C.I. 36-64%) were recorded. The therapeutic efficacy of the tested regimen was documented both in patients unresponsive to previous anthracyclines-taxanes combinations and in those relapsing after HDC. The median duration of response was 9 months and median survival 16 months. One third of patients experienced Grade-3 stomatitis-mucositis, hematological toxicity was mild and no cardiac toxicity was observed. Twenty-five women (52%) suffered from infusion-related phlebitis (in half of patients a central venous device was necessary at some point of the treatment program).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of FU infusion and VNR i.v. is an effective salvage treatment for heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients, and may represent a valid alternative when other cytotoxic regimens are not feasible.

Mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells with paclitaxel (taxol) as a single chemotheraupetic agent, associated with rhG-CSF

We assessed the mobilization capacity of taxol with rhG-CSF, both as a single chemotherapeutic agent and in the presence of cyclophosphamide (CY), and compared the effect with yields achieved when mobilization was performed solely with rhG-CSF. Fifteen patients with breast cancer received taxol 170 mg/m2 (continuous infusion, day 1) and rhG-CSF (8 microg/kg/day, from day 2 until the end of apheresis) (T-G group), while seven breast cancer patients were additionally treated with CY (4 g/m2) on day 2, followed by rhG-CSF starting at similar doses on day 3 (T-CY-G group). The PBSC collections after taxol with/without CY were compared with those of 30 breast cancer patients who had received rhG-CSF (8 microg/kg/day) for mobilization. No differences were found in the characteristics of patients included in any of the three mobilization groups. The median yield of CD34+ cells from all patients included in taxol containing schedules was 9 x 106/kg (range 2-26) collected with a median of one apheresis procedure (range 1-4). Leukaphereses began earlier in the T-G group (median day 8, range 7-10) than in the T-CY-G group (median day 13, range 11-17). In most patients (20 out of 22) who received taxol containing regimens, more than 2.5 x 106 CD34+ cells/kg, a threshold considered to be sufficient for hematopoietic reconstitution, were collected with a single apheresis. Those patients in the T-G group experienced less neutropenic and thrombocytopenic days, with all neutropenic fever episodes developing in patients treated with the T-CY-G schedule (43%). When considering priming with rhG-CSF alone in our historical cohort of 30 breast cancer patients, a significant detrimental effect was observed in comparison with taxol mobilizing schedules, in the number of aphereses performed, in the total yield CD34+cells and in the number of patients who achieved the target dose of 2.5 x 106/kg CD34+ cells within the first collection procedure. We conclude that taxol containing schedules are effective in mobilizing PBSC and facilitate the collection of high yields of CD34+ cells (usually more than 5 x 106/kg recipient body weight) with a reduced number of apheresis procedures. Taxol, as a single agent with rhG-CSF, exhibits less hematological toxicity than the combination chemotherapy mobilization regimen including CY. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 231-235.