Photodynamic therapy of a transplanted pancreatic cancer model using meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC)

Photodynamic Stromal Depletion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest solid malignancies, with a five-year survival of less than 10%. The resistance of the disease and the associated lack of therapeutic response is attributed primarily to its dense, fibrotic stroma, which acts as a barrier to drug perfusion and permits tumour survival and invasion. As clinical trials of chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and targeted agents have not been successful, improving the survival rate in unresectable PDAC remains an urgent clinical need. Photodynamic stromal depletion (PSD) is a recent approach that uses visible or near-infrared light to destroy the desmoplastic tissue. Preclinical evidence suggests this can resensitise tumour cells to subsequent therapies whilst averting the tumorigenic effects of tumour-stromal cell interactions. So far, the pre-clinical studies have suggested that PDT can successfully mediate the destruction of various stromal elements without increasing the aggressiveness of the tumour. However, the complexity of this interplay, including the combined tumour promoting and suppressing effects, poses unknowns for the clinical application of photodynamic stromal depletion in PDAC.

Photodynamic Therapy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Simple Summary

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal of human cancers. Numerous clinical trials evaluating various combinations of chemotherapy and targeted agents and radiotherapy have failed to provide meaningful improvements in survival. A growing number of studies however have indicated that photodynamic therapy (PDT) may be a viable approach for treatment of some pancreatic tumors. PDT, which uses light to activate a photosensitizing agent in target tissue, has seen widespread adoption primarily for dermatological and other applications where superficial light delivery is relatively straightforward. Advances in fiber optic light delivery and dosimetry however have been leveraged to enable PDT even for challenging internal sites, including the pancreas. The aim of this article is to help inform future directions by reviewing relevant literature on the basic science, current clinical status, and potential challenges in the development of PDT as a treatment for PDAC.

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal of human cancers. Clinical trials of various chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted agents and combination strategies have generally failed to provide meaningful improvement in survival for patients with unresectable disease. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a photochemistry-based approach that enables selective cell killing using tumor-localizing agents activated by visible or near-infrared light. In recent years, clinical studies have demonstrated the technical feasibility of PDT for patients with locally advanced PDAC while a growing body of preclinical literature has shown that PDT can overcome drug resistance and target problematic and aggressive disease. Emerging evidence also suggests the ability of PDT to target PDAC stroma, which is known to act as both a barrier to drug delivery and a tumor-promoting signaling partner. Here, we review the literature which indicates an emergent role of PDT in clinical management of PDAC, including the potential for combination with other targeted agents and RNA medicine.

Photodynamic therapy of pancreatic cancer: Where have we come from and where are we going?

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a potential adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer with several advantages. Mechanistically, pancreatic cancer PDT can induce apoptosis and necrosis of pancreatic cancer cells and lead to vascular damage and enhance anti-tumor immune response in tumor tissues. However, limitations of current photosensitizers such as limited penetration depth, poor targeted therapy and inadequate reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation still exist. Recently, several novel photosensitizers have been reported to break through limits in pancreatic cancer PDT. Methods combined with biomedical engineering, materialogy and chemical engineering have been employed to overcome the difficulties and to realize targeted therapy. Preclinical and clinical trials also preliminarily confirmed the technical feasibility and safety of pancreatic cancer PDT. Therefore, PDT may be potential to be used as an effective adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer multimodality therapy. This review will give an overview about pancreatic cancer PDT from basic experimental studies, preclinical and clinical application to future direction of pancreatic cancer PDT.

Systematic review of endoscopy ultrasound-guided thermal ablation treatment for pancreatic cancer

The development of curvilinear-array EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has led these approaches to become interventional procedures rather than purely diagnostic, as a minimally invasive antitumor therapeutic alternative to radiological and surgical treatments. The possibility to accurately position needle devices and to reach a deep target like the pancreas gland under real-time imaging guidance has expanded the use of EUS to ablate tumors. Currently, a variety of probes specifically designed for EUS ablation are available, including radiofrequency, hybrid cryothermal ablation (combining radiofrequency with cryotechnology), photodynamic therapy, and laser ablation. To date, several studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of these ablation techniques in the pancreatic setting, but only a few small series on pancreatic thermal ablation under EUS guidance are available. EUS-guided thermal ablation is primarily used for pancreatic cancer. It is well suited to this disease because of its superior anatomical access compared with other imaging modalities and the dismal prognosis despite improvements in chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the management of pancreatic cancer. Other targets are pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and pancreatic cystic neoplasms, which are curable by surgical resection, but some patients are poor surgical candidates or prefer conservative management. This is a literature review of previously published clinical studies on EUS-guided thermal ablative therapies. Data on the long-term efficacy of EUS-guided antitumor thermal ablation therapy and large prospective randomized studies are still needed to confirm the real clinical benefits of these techniques for the management of pancreatic neoplasms.

Photodynamic therapy for cancer of the pancreas – The story so far

Pancreatic cancer has long been a leading cause of cancer death. Few patients are suitable for surgery and for those who are not, the response to treatment is generally poor. No more than about 10% survive for more than a year. Recent research has focused on focal treatment for local disease control. This review covers the development of one of the most promising options, photodynamic therapy (PDT).

This review covers pre-clinical and clinical studies. Laboratory work was designed to understand the effect of PDT on the normal pancreas and surrounding tissues and on transplanted cancers in the hamster pancreas to ensure safety prior to clinical application. Essentially all clinical studies have been undertaken in University College Hospital, London. Phase-I studies used the photosensitisers mTHPC and verteporfin in patients with localised but inoperable cancers.

Laboratory results showed that normal pancreas, bile duct, liver, stomach and major blood vessels could tolerate PDT without any unacceptable effects on the structure and function of these organs. Necrosis that healed safely was documented in transplanted cancers. The clinical trials showed that focal necrosis could be produced in inoperable cancers with acceptable levels of complications, but considerable refinements of treatment delivery and monitoring are required before the technique will be ready for assessment in controlled clinical trials.

PDT is showing promise for the minimally invasive treatment of localised pancreatic cancers, but it is still at an early stage of development. Much more work will be necessary to optimise techniques for applying PDT to these cancers and for combining it with other therapeutic options such as chemotherapy.

Simultaneous delivery of cytotoxic and biologic therapeutics using nanophotoactivatable liposomes enhances treatment efficacy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer

A lack of intracellular delivery systems has limited the use of biologics such as monoclonal antibodies (mAb) that abrogate molecular signaling pathways activated to promote escape from cancer treatment. We hypothesized that intracellular co-delivery of the photocytotoxic chromophore benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid A (BPD) and the anti-VEGF mAb bevacizumab in a nanophotoactivatable liposome (nanoPAL) might enhance the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with suppression of VEGF-mediated signaling pathways. As a proof-of-concept we found that nanoPAL-PDT induced enhanced extra- and intracellular bevacizumab delivery and enhanced acute cytotoxicity in vitro. In an in vivo subcutaneous mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, nanoPAL-PDT achieved significantly enhanced tumor reduction. We attribute this to the optimal incorporation of insoluble BPD into the lipid bilayer, enhancing photocytotoxicity, and the simultaneous spatiotemporal delivery of bevacizumab, ensuring efficient neutralization of the rapid but transient burst of VEGF following PDT. From the Clinical Editor: Most patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by the time present the disease it is very advanced, which unavoidably translates to poor survival. For these patients, use of traditional chemotherapy often becomes ineffective due to tumor resistance to drugs. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can be an effective modality against chemo-resistant cancers. In this article, the authors investigated the co-delivery of a photocytotoxic agent and anti-VEGF mAb using liposomes. This combination was shown to results in enhanced tumor killing. This method should be applicable to other combination of treatments.

Cryosurgery for pancreatic cancer

The procedure of pancreatic cryosurgery is performed with intraoperative or percutaneous approaches. Based on current data and our initial experience, cryoablation appears to be a feasible, potentially safe and promising option in patients with locally advanced and unresectable pancreatic cancer. It is suggested that there are almost no known contraindications to the use of cryosurgery for pancreatic cancer. For most patients with pancreatic cancer, cryosurgery can substitute conventional surgery.

Aminolevulinic acid (ALA): photodynamic detection and potential therapeutic applications

Aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is a heme precursor that may have potential applications for photodynamic detection and photodynamic therapy-based treatment of solid tumors in a variety of malignancies. ALA may have a role in other applications in surgical oncology based on its ability to discriminate neoplastic tissue from adjacent normal tissue. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of the published studies of ALA in noncutaneous solid malignancies.

Verteporfin-based photodynamic therapy overcomes gemcitabine insensitivity in a panel of pancreatic cancer cell lines

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer is notoriously difficult to treat and resistant to virtually all therapeutics including gemcitabine, the standard front line agent for palliative chemotherapy. Early clinical studies point to a potential role for photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of this deadly disease. Here we examine PDT with verteporfin for treatment of cells that are nonresponsive to gemcitabine and identify intracellular and extracellular factors that govern sensitivity to each modality.

STUDY DESIGN

Using MTS we assess cytotoxicity of verteporfin-PDT in gemcitabine-treated nonresponsive populations from a panel of five pancreatic cancer cell lines representing a range of tumor histopathology and origin. We conduct Western blots for pro-/anti-apoptotic proteins bax and Bcl-XL to identify factors relevant to PDT and gemcitabine sensitivity. To examine the role of extracellular matrix influences we compare response to each modality in traditional cell culture conditions and cells grown on a laminin-rich basement membrane.

RESULTS

All cell lines have gemcitabine nonresponsive populations (17-33%) at doses up to 1 mM while moderate total verteporfin PDT doses (1-6 µM J/cm2) produce nearly complete killing. Our data shows that cells that are nonresponsive to sustained gemcitabine incubation are sensitive to verteporfin PDT indicating that the latter is agnostic to gemcitabine sensitivity. Verteporfin-based PDT decreases Bcl-XL and increases the bax/Bcl-XL ratio toward a pro-apoptotic balance. Insensitivity to gemcitabine is increased in cells that are adherent to basement membrane relative to traditional tissue culture conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively these results indicate the ability of verteporfin-based PDT to bypass intracellular and extracellular cues leading to gemcitabine resistance and point to the emerging role of this therapy for treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Temoporfin (Foscan®, 5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin)--a second-generation photosensitizer

This review traces the development and study of the second-generation photosensitizer 5,10,15,20-tetra(m-hydroxyphenyl)chlorin through to its acceptance and clinical use in modern photodynamic (cancer) therapy. The literature has been covered up to early 2011.

Verteporfin-based photodynamic therapy overcomes gemcitabine insensitivity in a panel of pancreatic cancer cell lines

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic cancer is notoriously difficult to treat and resistant to virtually all therapeutics including gemcitabine, the standard front line agent for palliative chemotherapy. Early clinical studies point to a potential role for photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the management of this deadly disease. Here we examine PDT with verteporfin for treatment of cells that are nonresponsive to gemcitabine and identify intracellular and extracellular factors that govern sensitivity to each modality.

STUDY DESIGN

Using MTS we assess cytotoxicity of verteporfin-PDT in gemcitabine-treated nonresponsive populations from a panel of five pancreatic cancer cell lines representing a range of tumor histopathology and origin. We conduct Western blots for pro-/anti-apoptotic proteins bax and Bcl-XL to identify factors relevant to PDT and gemcitabine sensitivity. To examine the role of extracellular matrix influences we compare response to each modality in traditional cell culture conditions and cells grown on a laminin-rich basement membrane.

RESULTS

All cell lines have gemcitabine nonresponsive populations (17-33%) at doses up to 1 mM while moderate total verteporfin PDT doses (1-6 µM J/cm2) produce nearly complete killing. Our data shows that cells that are nonresponsive to sustained gemcitabine incubation are sensitive to verteporfin PDT indicating that the latter is agnostic to gemcitabine sensitivity. Verteporfin-based PDT decreases Bcl-XL and increases the bax/Bcl-XL ratio toward a pro-apoptotic balance. Insensitivity to gemcitabine is increased in cells that are adherent to basement membrane relative to traditional tissue culture conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively these results indicate the ability of verteporfin-based PDT to bypass intracellular and extracellular cues leading to gemcitabine resistance and point to the emerging role of this therapy for treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Oncologic photodynamic therapy photosensitizers: a clinical review

A myriad of naturally occurring and synthetic structures are capable of transferring the energy of light. Few, however, allow for this energy transfer to enable a type II photochemical reaction which, as currently practiced, is a fundamental component of photodynamic therapy. Even fewer of these agents, aptly termed photosensitizers, have found success in the treatment of patients. This review will focus on the oncologic photosensitizers that have come to clinical trial with outcomes published in peer reviewed journals. Based on a clinical orientation the qualities of successful photosensitizers will be examined, how current drugs fare and potential future options explored.

Photodynamic therapy for pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the status of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of cancers of the pancreas.

METHODS

Original and review articles, editorials, and case reports published primarily in English and listed in Medline/ISI up to October 2006 or identified by a manual search have been reviewed in an attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms of PDT action and clinical application of PDT in the treatment of pancreatic cancers.

RESULTS

Photodynamic therapy represents a novel treatment of pancreatic malignancy; it produces local necrosis of tissue with light after administration of a photosensitizing agent. Evidences from in vivo and in vitro results have shown that PDT significantly decreases pancreatic cancer cell growth, destroys pancreatic carcinoma, and prolongs the survival of patients with unresectable pancreatic malignancy, and also show that PDT has disadvantages and limitations for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy can be an effective treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer, but more extensive preclinical and clinical trials are needed for further improvement in the clinical application of PDT, especially in avoidance of complications during PDT.

Photodynamic therapy using verteporfin photosensitization in the pancreas and surrounding tissues in the Syrian golden hamster

BACKGROUND/AIM

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a potential treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. We aimed to assess the safety of interstitial PDT using verteporfin (benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid A - a novel photosensitizer with a short drug-light interval and limited cutaneous photosensitivity) in the Syrian golden hamster, and compare it to meso-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) which we have previously evaluated in preclinical and clinical studies.

METHODS

Verteporfin (2 mg/kg) was administered at laparotomy by inferior vena caval injection (n = 57), with plasma levels quantified at 5, 15, 30, 60 and 240 min, and 24 h. 15 min after photosensitization, tissues (liver, pancreas, duodenum, colon, aorta) were illuminated with 690 nm red laser light (150 mW), at a range of light doses (1-100 J/cm(2)). The PDT effects on the targeted organ and adjacent structures were assessed at post-mortem on days 3 and 21, or at the time of death.

RESULTS

The elimination half-life of verteporfin was 4-5 h. Light doses of 10, 25 and 50 J/cm(2) were safe in the hamster pancreas, liver and colon, respectively, and produced coagulative necrotic lesions of 3 (range 3-4), 10 (9-10) and 7 (7-8) mm diameter. Collagen was resistant to damage and lesions healed mainly by regeneration of normal tissue. At higher light doses, necrosis extended to the edge of organs, sometimes causing sealed duodenal perforations as seen with mTHPC.

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of verteporfin is very similar to mTHPC, with the advantages of a shorter drug-light interval and drug elimination time. Phase I clinical studies using this photosensitizer in pancreatic cancer should be feasible.

Uses of photodynamic therapy in premalignant and malignant lesions of the gastrointestinal tract beyond the esophagus

Much has recently been written regarding the use of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma and dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. This review, however, describes the clinical experience using photodynamic therapy with various photosensitizer agents for the treatment of diseases in other areas of the gut, especially the pancreaticobiliary tract where European studies have established the role of porfimer sodium photodynamic therapy in the management of patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Photodynamic therapy for pancreatic and biliary tract carcinoma

The prognosis of patients with pancreatic and biliary tract cancer treated with conventional therapies such as stent insertion or chemotherapy is often poor, and new approaches are urgently needed. Surgery is the only curative treatment but is appropriate in less than 20% of cases, and even then it is associated with a 5-yr survival of less than 30% in selected series. Photodynamic therapy represents a novel treatment for pancreaticobiliary malignancy. It is a way of producing localized tissue necrosis with light, most conveniently from a low-power, red laser, after prior administration of a photosensitizing agent, thereby initiating a non-thermal cytotoxic effect and tissue necrosis. This review outlines the mechanisms of action of photodynamic therapy including direct cell death, vascular injury, and immune system activation, and summarizes the results of preclinical and clinical studies of photodynamic therapy for pancreaticobiliary malignancy.

EUS-guided photodynamic therapy of the pancreas: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy of pancreatic cancer by using percutaneously placed light catheters has been reported. The feasibility and safety of EUS-guided photodynamic therapy of the pancreas was studied in a porcine model.

METHODS

After injection of porfimer sodium, a 19-gauge needle was inserted into the pancreas, the liver, the spleen, and the kidney under EUS guidance. A small diameter quartz optical fiber was passed through the EUS needle and used to illuminate the tissue with laser light. The tissue response to photodynamic therapy was examined.

RESULTS

Localized tissue necrosis was achieved in all organs, without significant complication. There was no significant difference in inflammation induced by photodynamic therapy within the various organs.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-guided photodynamic therapy is a safe and simple technique that can induce small areas of focal tissue ablation within the liver, the pancreas, the kidney, and the spleen, and potentially could be used to treat a variety of benign and malignant conditions.

N/A

N/A

Experimental photodynamic therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma with pegylated mTHPC

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Experimental assessment of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for malignant pleural mesothelioma using a polyethylene glycol conjugate of meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (PEG-mTHPC).

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS

(a) PDT was tested on H-meso-1 xenografts (652 nm laser light; fluence 10 J/cm(2); 0.93, 9.3, or 27.8 mg/kg of PEG-mTHPC; drug-light intervals 3-8 days). (b) Intraoperative PDT with similar treatment conditions was performed in the chest cavity of minipigs (n = 18) following extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) using an optical integrating balloon device combined with in situ light dosimetry.

RESULTS

(a) PDT using PEG-mTHPC resulted in larger extent of tumor necrosis than in untreated tumors (P < or = 0.01) without causing damage to normal tissue. (b) Intraoperative PDT following EPP was well tolerated in 17 of 18 animals. Mean fluence and fluence rates measured at four sites of the chest cavity ranged from 10.2 +/- 0.2 to 13.2 +/- 2.3 J/cm(2) and 5.5 +/- 1.2 to 7.9 +/- 1.7 mW/cm(2) (mean +/- SD). Histology 3 months after light delivery revealed no PDT related tissue injury in all but one animal.

CONCLUSIONS

PEG-mTHPC mediated PDT showed selective destruction of mesothelioma xenografts without causing damage to intrathoracic organs in pigs at similar treatment conditions. The light delivery system afforded regular light distribution to different parts of the chest cavity.

Photodynamic therapy for cancer of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

Few pancreatic cancers are suitable for surgery and few respond to chemoradiation. Photodynamic therapy produces local necrosis of tissue with light after prior administration of a photosensitising agent, and in experimental studies can be tolerated by the pancreas and surrounding normal tissue.

AIMS

To undertake a phase I study of photodynamic therapy for cancer of the pancreas.

PATIENTS

Sixteen patients with inoperable adenocarcinomas (2.5-6 cm in diameter) localised to the region of the head of the pancreas were studied. All presented with obstructive jaundice which was relieved by biliary stenting prior to further treatment.

METHODS

Patients were photosensitised with 0.15 mg/kg meso-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorin intravenously. Three days later, light was delivered to the cancer percutaneously using fibres positioned under computerised tomographic guidance. Three had subsequent chemotherapy.

RESULTS

All patients had substantial tumour necrosis on scans after treatment. Fourteen of 16 left hospital within 10 days. Eleven had a Karnofsky performance status of 100 prior to treatment. In 10 it returned to 100 at one month. Two patients with tumour involving the gastroduodenal artery had significant gastrointestinal bleeds (controlled without surgery). Three patients developed duodenal obstruction during follow up that may have been related to treatment. There was no treatment related mortality. The median survival time after photodynamic therapy was 9.5 months (range 4-30). Seven of 16 patients (44%) were alive one year after photodynamic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy can produce necrosis in pancreatic cancers with an acceptable morbidity although care is required for tumours invading the duodenal wall or involving the gastroduodenal artery. Further studies are indicated to assess its influence on the course of the disease, alone or in combination with chemoradiation.

Photodynamic therapy and the alimentary tract

Photodynamic therapy offers the possibility of relatively selective tumour necrosis and normal tissue healing. It has many potential applications but as yet no clear role. Articles, editorials and case reports published primarily in English and listed in Medline/ISI up to April 2000 or identified by a manual search have been reviewed in an attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of photodynamic therapy in the alimentary tract. It is concluded that photodynamic therapy can be an effective treatment for superficial pre-malignant mucosal lesions and early cancers, especially in diffuse disease. Suitable patients include those wishing to avoid surgery, high risk subjects or those in whom other forms of treatment have failed. Superiority over other methods of ablation has not so far been demonstrated. Cheaper and more effective photosensitizers and improved techniques of light delivery are likely to increase the application of photodynamic therapy.

The binding characteristics and intracellular localization of temoporfin (mTHPC) in myeloid leukemia cells: phototoxicity and mitochondrial damage

The state of aggregation of the photosensitizer meso-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC) in both cell free and intracellular environment was elucidated by comparing its absorption and excitation spectra. In methanol, mTHPC existed as monomers and strongly fluoresced. In aqueous solutions such as phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), mTHPC formed nonfluorescent aggregates. Some portion of mTHPC monomerized in the presence of 10% fetal calf serum PBS. In murine myeloid leukemia M1 and WEHI-3B (JCS) cells, cytoplasmic mTHPC were monomeric. By using organelle-specific fluorescent probes, it was found that mTHPC localized preferentially at the mitochondria and the perinuclear region. Photodynamic treatment of mTHPC-sensitized leukemia cells caused rapid appearance of the apoptogenic protein cytochrome c in the cytosol. Results from flow cytometric analysis showed that the release of cytochrome c was especially pronounced in JCS cells, and well correlated with the extent of apoptotic cell death as reported earlier. Electron microscopy revealed the loss of integrity of the mitochondrial membrane and the appearance of chromatin condensation as early as 1 h after light irradiation. We conclude that rapid release of cytochrome c from photodamaged mitochondria is responsible for the mTHPC-induced apoptosis in the myeloid leukemia JCS and M1 cells.

Photocytotoxic and DNA damaging effect of temoporfin (mTHPC) and merocyanine 540 (MC540) on nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new approach to cancer treatment for a variety of malignant tumors. In this study, two clinical photosensitizers, Temoporfin (meta-tetra-hydroxyl-phenyl-chlorin; mTHPC) and merocyanine 540 (MC540), were selected to explore for their photocytotoxic and genotoxic effects on nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells (NPC/HK1 and CNE2). Results of tetrazolium reduction assay showed that 80% cell killing were achieved for both cell lines at 0.4 microg/ml mTHPC for 24 h incubation and then with 40 kJ/m2 light irradiation, whereas 40 microg/ml MC540 with 50 kJ/m2 light dosage was required to attain the same level of phototoxicity for NPC/HK1. On the contrary, NPC/CNE2 was quite resistant to MC540. Hence, mTHPC-mediated PDT exerted a more potent effect than MC540-mediated PDT, even though the molar extinction coefficient of the main absorption peak for MC540 is much higher than that of mTHPC. Dark cytotoxicity remained negligible for both sensitizers. Comet assay was used to evaluate the DNA strand break and potential genotoxic effect induced by mTHPC and MC540 on the NPC cells. No DNA strand break was detected in the absence of light, and under sublethal treatment (LD25) for either sensitizer-loaded cells. Confocal laser scanning microscopy showed that mTHPC and MC540 localized in the cytoplasm but not in the nucleus of the tumor cells, which provided evidence for undetectable DNA damage under dark and low photodynamic dose.

Effective treatment of liver metastases with photodynamic therapy, using the second-generation photosensitizer meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC), in a rat model

The only curative treatment for patients with liver metastases to date is surgery, but few patients are suitable candidates for hepatic resection. The majority of patients will have to rely on other treatment modalities for palliation. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) could be a selective, minimally invasive treatment for patients with liver metastases. We studied PDT in an implanted colon carcinoma in the liver of Wag/Rij rats, using the photosensitizer meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin (mTHPC). mTHPC tissue kinetics were studied using ex vivo extractions and in vivo fluorescence measurements. Both methods showed that mTHPC kinetics were different for liver and tumour tissue. After initial high levels at 4 h after administration (0.1 and 0.3 mg kg(-1)) mTHPC in liver tissue decreased rapidly in time. In tumour tissue no decrease in photosensitizer levels occurred, with mTHPC remaining high up to 48 h after administration. Both concentration data and fluorescence data showed an increase in tumour to liver ratios of up to 6.3 and 5.0 respectively. Illumination with 652 nm (15 J) resulted in extensive damage to tumour tissue, with necrosis of up to 13 mm in diameter. Damage to normal liver tissue was mild and transient as serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels normalized within a week after PDT treatment. Long-term effects of mTHPC-PDT were studied on day 28 after treatment. Regardless of drug dose and drug-light interval, PDT with mTHPC resulted in complete tumour remission in 27 out of 31 treated animals (87%), with only four animals in which tumour regrowth was observed. Non-responding tumours proved to be significantly larger (P < 0.001) in size before PDT treatment. This study demonstrates that mTHPC is retained in an intrahepatic tumour and that mTHPC-PDT is capable of inducing complete tumour remission of liver tumours.

Current concepts in gastrointestinal photodynamic therapy

OBJECTIVE

To review current concepts of photodynamic therapy (PDT) applied to the treatment of tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

PDT initially involves the uptake or production of a photosensitive compound by tumor cells. Subsequent activation of the photoreactive compound by a specific wavelength of light results in cell death, either directly or as a result of vascular compromise and/or apoptosis.

METHODS

The authors selectively review current concepts relating to photosensitization, photoactivation, time of PDT application, tissue selectivity, sites of photodynamic action, PDT effects on normal tissue, limitations of PDT, toxicity of photosensitizers, application of principles of PDT to tumor detection, and current applications of PDT to tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.

RESULTS

PDT is clearly effective for small cancers, but it is not yet clear in which cases such treatment is more effective than other currently acceptable approaches. The major side effect of PDT is cutaneous photosensitization. The major limitation of PDT is depth of tumor kill. As data from current and future clinical trials become available, a clearer perspective of where PDT fits in the treatment of cancers will be gained. Many issues regarding pharmacokinetic data of photosensitizers, newer technology involved in light sources, optimal treatment regimens that take advantage of the pharmacophysiology of photoablation, and light dosimetry still require solution. One can foresee application of differing sensitizers and light sources depending on the specific clinical situation. As technologic advances occur, interstitial PDT may have significant application.

CONCLUSIONS

PDT has a potentially important role either as a primary or adjuvant mode of treatment of tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.

Fine-needle interstitial photodynamic therapy of the lung parenchyma: photosensitizer distribution and morphologic effects of treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To look at the effect of interstitial photodynamic therapy (PDT) in normal lung parenchyma to assess its potential for treating localized, peripheral lung tumors.

DESIGN

Studies were performed on normal Wistar rats using the photosensitizer meso-tetrahydroxyphenyl chlorine. Drug distribution was measured by fluorescence microscopy on tissue sections. Light was delivered to the lungs via a single fiber inserted percutaneously under x-ray control and the PDT effect studied in animals killed at times up to 6 months later.

RESULTS

Fluorescence studies showed that the drug was initially distributed throughout the lung, but was later predominantly in the vasculature, bronchi, and macrophages. PDT produced sharply defined zones of hemorrhagic necrosis up to 12 mm in diameter that healed with regeneration of bronchial epithelium and local fibrosis. Different histologic effects were seen between drug light intervals of 1 and 3 days. Treatment was well tolerated, there was a low incidence of pneumothorax, and as long as the fiber tip was within the lung parenchyma, there was no damage to adjacent tissues.

CONCLUSION

Interstitial PDT produces zones of necrosis in normal lung that heal safely by a percutaneous technique without affecting adjacent areas of untreated lung. If the lesion size can be increased by using multiple fibers, this could be a promising new technique for treating localized, peripheral lung cancers in patients who are unfit for surgery.