Cytogenetic comparisons of synchronous carcinomas and polyps in patients with colorectal cancer

Selection and adaptation during metastatic cancer progression

Cancer is often regarded as a process of asexual evolution driven by genomic and genetic instability. Mutation, selection and adaptation are by convention thought to occur primarily within, and to a lesser degree outside, the primary tumour. However, disseminated cancer cells that remain after 'curative' surgery exhibit extreme genomic heterogeneity before the manifestation of metastasis. This heterogeneity is later reduced by selected clonal expansion, suggesting that the disseminated cells had yet to acquire key traits of fully malignant cells. Abrogation of the cells' progression outside the primary tumour implies new challenges and opportunities for diagnosis and adjuvant therapies.

Genome instability: does genetic diversity amplification drive tumorigenesis?

Recent data show that catastrophic events during one cell cycle can cause massive genome damage producing viable clones with unstable genomes. This is in contrast with the traditional view that tumorigenesis requires a long-term process in which mutations gradually accumulate over decades. These sudden events are likely to result in a large increase in genomic diversity within a relatively short time, providing the opportunity for selective advantages to be gained by a subset of cells within a population. This genetic diversity amplification, arising from a single aberrant cell cycle, may drive a population conversion from benign to malignant. However, there is likely a period of relative genome stability during the clonal expansion of tumors - this may provide an opportunity for therapeutic intervention, especially if mechanisms that limit tolerance of aneuploidy are exploited.

Cytogenetic analysis of tumor clonality

All or almost all neoplasias subjected to systematic cytogenetic scrutiny have been found to harbor acquired chromosomal aberrations. The paradigm stemming from the study of hematopoietic malignancies and sarcomas is that cancers are of monoclonal origin (i.e., they have developed from a single transformed somatic progenitor) because all the neoplastic parenchyma cells share at least one primary chromosomal abnormality, with subsequent clonal evolution along the lines of Darwinian selection occurring among the various subclones carrying secondary aberrations. When carcinomas began to be studied more extensively by cytogenetic methods, however, sometimes many cytogenetically unrelated clones were found, in seeming contradiction to the monoclonal hypothesis. Also studies of multiple samples from the same patient led to a rethinking of what the cytogenetic evidence really revealed about tumor clonality, both in its early stages and during disease development. The observed cytogenetic heterogeneity in, for example, tumors of the breast and pancreas vastly surpasses that of leukemias, lymphomas, connective tissue tumors, or even most epithelial, including uroepithelial, tumors. Theoretical reasoning as well as the available experimental data we here review show that the clonal evolution of neoplastic cell populations follows either of four principal pathways: (1) initial monoclonality is retained throughout the entire course of the disease with no additional, secondary aberrations accrued as judged by karyotypic appearance; (2) tumorigenesis is monoclonal but additional aberrations develop with time leading to secondary clonal heterogeneity (clonal divergence); (3) polyclonal tumorigenesis exists from the beginning but is followed by an overall reduction in genomic complexity with time (clonal convergence) due to selection among cytogenetically unrelated clones during tumor progression, resulting in secondary oligo- or monoclonality; or (4) polyclonal tumorigenesis with early clonal convergence is followed by later clonal divergence due to the acquisition of additional cytogenetic changes by the clone(s) that survived during the middle phases of tumor progression. Further studies of individual tumor cells are necessary to elicit precise information about the cell-to-cell variability that exists in many, especially epithelial, neoplasms and which holds the key to a more profound understanding of the complex issue of tumor clonality during all stages of cancer development.

pRB, a tumor suppressor with a stabilizing presence

The product of the retinoblastoma tumor-susceptibility gene (RB1) is a key regulator of cell proliferation and this function is thought to be central to its tumor suppressive activity. Several studies have demonstrated that inactivation of pRB not only allows inappropriate proliferation but also undermines mitotic fidelity, leading to genome instability and ploidy changes. Such properties promote tumor evolution and correlate with increased resistance to therapeutics and tumor relapse. These observations suggest that inactivation of pRB could contribute to both tumor initiation and progression. Further characterization of the role of pRB in chromosome segregation will provide insight into processes that are misregulated in human tumors and could reveal new therapeutic targets to kill or stall these chromosomally unstable lesions. We review the evidence that pRB promotes genome stability and discuss the mechanisms that probably contribute to this effect.

The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer

The acquisition of genomic instability is a crucial feature in tumor development and there are at least 3 distinct pathways in colorectal cancer pathogenesis: the chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype pathways. Most cases of colorectal cancer arise through the CIN pathway, which is characterized by widespread imbalances in chromosome number (aneuploidy) and loss of heterozygosity. It can result from defects in chromosomal segregation, telomere stability, and the DNA damage response, although the full complement of genes underlying CIN remains incompletely described. Coupled with the karyotypic abnormalities observed in CIN tumors are the accumulation of a characteristic set of mutations in specific tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes that activate pathways critical for colorectal cancer initiation and progression. Whether CIN creates the appropriate milieu for the accumulation of these mutations or vice versa remains a provocative and unanswered question. The goal of this review is to provide an updated perspective on the mechanisms that lead to CIN and the key mutations that are acquired in this pathway.

The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer

The acquisition of genomic instability is a crucial feature in tumor development and there are at least 3 distinct pathways in colorectal cancer pathogenesis: the chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype pathways. Most cases of colorectal cancer arise through the CIN pathway, which is characterized by widespread imbalances in chromosome number (aneuploidy) and loss of heterozygosity. It can result from defects in chromosomal segregation, telomere stability, and the DNA damage response, although the full complement of genes underlying CIN remains incompletely described. Coupled with the karyotypic abnormalities observed in CIN tumors are the accumulation of a characteristic set of mutations in specific tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes that activate pathways critical for colorectal cancer initiation and progression. Whether CIN creates the appropriate milieu for the accumulation of these mutations or vice versa remains a provocative and unanswered question. The goal of this review is to provide an updated perspective on the mechanisms that lead to CIN and the key mutations that are acquired in this pathway.

The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer

The acquisition of genomic instability is a crucial feature in tumor development and there are at least 3 distinct pathways in colorectal cancer pathogenesis: the chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype pathways. Most cases of colorectal cancer arise through the CIN pathway, which is characterized by widespread imbalances in chromosome number (aneuploidy) and loss of heterozygosity. It can result from defects in chromosomal segregation, telomere stability, and the DNA damage response, although the full complement of genes underlying CIN remains incompletely described. Coupled with the karyotypic abnormalities observed in CIN tumors are the accumulation of a characteristic set of mutations in specific tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes that activate pathways critical for colorectal cancer initiation and progression. Whether CIN creates the appropriate milieu for the accumulation of these mutations or vice versa remains a provocative and unanswered question. The goal of this review is to provide an updated perspective on the mechanisms that lead to CIN and the key mutations that are acquired in this pathway.

Definitive molecular cytogenetic characterization of 15 colorectal cancer cell lines

In defining the genetic profiles in cancer, cytogenetically aberrant cell lines derived from primary tumors are important tools for the study of carcinogenesis. Here, we present the results of a comprehensive investigation of 15 established colorectal cancer cell lines using spectral karyotyping (SKY), fluorescence in situ hybridization, and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Detailed karyotypic analysis by SKY on five of the lines (P53HCT116, T84, NCI-H508, NCI-H716, and SK-CO-1) is described here for the first time. The five lines with karyotypes in the diploid range and that are characterized by defects in DNA mismatch repair had a mean of 4.8 chromosomal abnormalities per line, whereas the 10 aneuploid lines exhibited complex karyotypes and a mean of 30 chromosomal abnormalities. Of the 150 clonal translocations, only eight were balanced and none were recurrent among the lines. We also reviewed the karyotypes of 345 cases of adenocarcinoma of the large intestine listed in the Mitelman Database of Chromosome Aberrations in Cancer. The types of abnormalities observed in the cell lines reflected those seen in primary tumors: there were no recurrent translocations in either tumors or cell lines; isochromosomes were the most common recurrent abnormalities; and breakpoints occurred most frequently at the centromeric/pericentromeric and telomere regions. Of the genomic imbalances detected by array CGH, 87% correlated with chromosome aberrations observed in the SKY studies. The fact that chromosome abnormalities predominantly result in copy number changes rather than specific chromosome or gene fusions suggests that this may be the major mechanism leading to carcinogenesis in colorectal cancer.

Chromosomal rearrangement as the basis for human tumourigenesis

PURPOSE

To develop a model for the initiation of human tumourigenesis that is consistent with various observations that are difficult to reconcile with current models.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel model of tumourigenesis was developed that includes three basic postulates: (1) tumourigenesis is initiated by recombinogenic DNA lesions, (2) potentially recombinogenic DNA lesions in transcribed regions of the genome can be converted into chromosomal rearrangements and (3) chromosomal rearrangements alone are insufficient for tumourigenesis but can initiate a mutator/recombinator phenotype.

Studying chromosome instability in the mouse

Aneuploidy has long been recognized as one of the hallmarks of cancer. It nonetheless remains uncertain whether aneuploidy occurring early in the development of a cancer is a primary cause of oncogenic transformation, or whether it is an epiphenomenon that arises from a general breakdown in cell cycle control late in tumorigenesis. The accuracy of chromosome segregation is ensured both by the intrinsic mechanics of mitosis and by an error-checking spindle assembly checkpoint. Many cancers show altered expression of proteins involved in the spindle checkpoint or in proteins implicated in other mitotic processes. To understand the role of aneuploidy in the initiation and progression of cancer, a number of spindle checkpoint genes have been disrupted in mice, most through conventional gene targeting (to create germ-line knockouts). We describe the consequence of these mutations with respect to embryonic development, tumor progression and an unexpected link to premature aging; readers are referred elsewhere [1] for a discussion of other cell cycle regulators.

Allelotyping analyses of synchronous primary and metastasis CIN colon cancers identified different subtypes

In colorectal cancer, the molecular alterations that lead to metastasis are not clearly established, probably because of their high genetic complexity. To identify combinations of genetic changes involved in tumor progression and metastasis, we focused on chromosome instable (CIN) colon cancers. We compared by allelotyping of 33 microsatellites, the genomic alterations of 38 primary colon tumors with the synchronously resected matched liver metastases (CLM). We observed that (i) the number of patients with alterations at certain loci did not differ significantly between the whole primary tumor and the paired CLM, (ii) a group of patients had fewer alterations in the metastasis when compared with the matched primary tumor. A 2-way hierarchical unsupervised clustering of the allelotyping data revealed 2 tumor subtypes that have different levels of CIN (CIN-High, CIN-Low). Both subtypes have a minimal common set of alterations at chromosomes 8p, 17p and 18q, but does not include alteration at 5q or mutation at K-Ras. These 2 subtypes were also observed using a collection of 104 independent primary CIN colon tumors. In addition, we found a third subtype, consisting of tumors with a very low number of alterations not associated with specific loci (CIN-Very Low). We found that colon carcinogenesis may require a minimal set of alterations and that, in contrast to the current hypothesis, the level of CIN does not correlate with tumor progression. Therefore, our results suggest that metastasis potential could be present at very early stages of tumor development.

Stage-specific alterations of the genome, transcriptome, and proteome during colorectal carcinogenesis

To identify sequential alterations of the genome, transcriptome, and proteome during colorectal cancer progression, we have analyzed tissue samples from 36 patients, including the complete mucosa-adenoma-carcinoma sequence from 8 patients. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) revealed patterns of stage specific, recurrent genomic imbalances. Gene expression analysis on 9K cDNA arrays identified 58 genes differentially expressed between normal mucosa and adenoma, 116 genes between adenoma and carcinoma, and 158 genes between primary carcinoma and liver metastasis (P < 0.001). Parallel analysis of our samples by CGH and expression profiling revealed a direct correlation of chromosomal copy number changes with chromosome-specific average gene expression levels. Protein expression was analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and subsequent mass spectrometry. Although there was no direct match of differentially expressed proteins and genes, the majority of them belonged to identical pathways or networks. In conclusion, increasing genomic instability and a recurrent pattern of chromosomal imbalances as well as specific gene and protein expression changes correlate with distinct stages of colorectal cancer progression. Chromosomal aneuploidies directly affect average resident gene expression levels, thereby contributing to a massive deregulation of the cellular transcriptome. The identification of novel genes and proteins might deliver molecular targets for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

Expression and genomic profiling of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer still represents a paradigm for the elucidation of the cellular, genetic and molecular mechanisms that underly solid tumor initiation, progression to malignancy, and metastasis to distal organ sites. The relative ease with which pathological specimens can be obtained by either surgery or endoscopy from different stages of tumor progression has facilitated the application of omics technologies to allow the genome-wide analysis both at the RNA (gene expression) and DNA (aneuploidy) levels. Here, we have reviewed the multiplicity of studies appeared to date in the scientific literature on the expression and genomic analysis of colorectal cancer, and attempted an integration of the profiling data generated and made available in the public domain. This approach is likely to pinpoint specific chromosomal loci and the corresponding genes which (i) play rate-limiting roles in colorectal cancer, (ii) represent putative diagnostic and prognostic markers for the accurate prediction of clinical outcome and response to treatment, and (iii) encompass potential therapeutic targets. Moreover, cross-species data mining and integration of the human colorectal cancer profiles with those obtained from mouse models of intestinal tumorigenesis will even more contribute to the elucidation of highly conserved pathways and cellular functions underlying malignancy in the GI tract. Notwithstanding the above promises, tumor heterogeneity, limited cohort sizes, and methodological differences among experimental and bioinformatic approaches still poses main obstacles towards the optimal utilization and integration of omics profiles.

Common pattern of unusual chromosome abnormalities in hereditary papillary renal carcinoma

In this study, we summarized cytogenetic and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) results, mutation analysis of the MET gene, and immunohistochemistry results of tumors from three patients in the same family who were affected by hereditary papillary renal carcinoma (HPRC). All three patients showed germline mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the MET proto-oncogene, and developed bilateral and multiple papillary renal tumors. DNA mutation analysis showed an increased dosage of the mutant allele in six tumors from two patients but not in two tumors from the third patient. In addition to the recurrent chromosomal alterations found in papillary renal carcinomas, cytogenetic analyses revealed the presence of an identical chromosomal translocation, t(2;15)(q13;p11), in two different tumors from the same patient. Moreover, the same pattern of autosomal trisomies (+7, +12, +13, +17) was detected by CGH analysis in tumors from different siblings. Taking into account that the presence of an identical structural chromosomal aberration in two tumors and the gain of chromosome 13 are unusual chromosomal changes in this type of tumor, we can conclude that our results confirm those of other authors and suggest that the genetic predisposition to HPRC might predispose the acquisition of genomic alterations in specific chromosomes or chromosomal regions.

Tumor karyotype predicts clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic value of the overall karyotypic features and specific chromosome aberrations in colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cytogenetic features of 150 primary CRCs investigated at the time of surgery were correlated with patient survival by univariate and multivariate analyses, using classical clinicopathologic parameters as covariates.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, in addition to tumor grade and clinical stage, structural aberrations as well as rearrangements of chromosomes 8 and 16 were significantly correlated with shorter overall survival. Karyotypic complexity, rearrangements of chromosomes 8 and 16, and loss of chromosome 4 were significantly correlated with shorter disease-free survival. In multivariate analysis, in addition to tumor grade, the type of chromosome aberrations (structural or numerical), ploidy, and loss of chromosome 18 came across as independent prognostic factors in the group of all patients. In the subset of patients with stage I and II carcinomas, none of the clinicopathologic variables could independently predict patient survival, whereas the presence of structural chromosomal aberrations was the only independent predictor of poor prognosis. In the subset of patients with stage III carcinomas, the presence of structural changes of chromosome 8 was a stronger independent predictor of prognosis than was tumor grade.

CONCLUSION

Cytogenetic tumor features are valuable predictors of prognosis in CRC patients. The tumor karyotype should therefore be taken into account in the clinical management of patients with this disease, especially for patients having cancers of the early or intermediate stages I, II, and III.

Genetic evolution in colon cancer KM12 cells and metastatic derivates

So far, CRC cell lines have contributed to descriptions of 2 patterns of genetic instability, affecting either microsatellite sequences or chromosome number and structure. Often, these patterns are mutually exclusive; while near-diploid karyotypes usually appear with MSI and chromosomal stability, near-triploid or tetraploid cells display a high degree of CIN and are stable at the microsatellite level. In the present study, we describe the genomic instability pattern of KM12 CRC cells. KM12C and derived cell lines with different metastatic properties were analyzed by conventional cytogenetics, CGH and M-FISH. Results were compared to 5 cell lines usually used as model of MSI and CIN. Concordance between our results and previously published SKY data are also reviewed. Interestingly, the poorly metastatic KM12C cell line displayed a near-diploid karyotype with high levels of structural chromosome instability and microsatellite instability. The highly metastatic KM12SM and KM12L4A cell lines showed polyploid karyotypes and maintained CIN and MSI. A comparison between karyotypes of poorly and highly metastatic KM12 cell lines allowed us to delineate a cytogenetic evolution pathway. Our results clearly demonstrated that endoreduplication was the origin of the polyploid dosages in the highly metastatic forms following the monosomic model postulated for CRC. Therefore, we demonstrate that KM12C cells and their metastatic derivates, KM12SM and KM12L4A, are a useful model of chromosomal evolution where MSI may coexist with CIN.

Genomic instability--the engine of tumorigenesis?

Human cancers harbour numerous mutations and it has been proposed that these result from some form of inherent genomic instability. Some cancers have proven genomic instability or features that are indicative of this. Inherited cancer syndromes exist that are caused by deficient DNA repair or chromosomal integrity. By contrast, theoretical analysis and experimental data from sporadic colorectal tumours provide little general evidence of genomic instability in early lesions. These apparently conflicting data raise the question of whether or not genomic instability is necessary for driving tumour growth, and whether or not it is the usual initiating event in tumorigenesis.

Mutation-selection networks of cancer initiation: tumor suppressor genes and chromosomal instability

In this paper, we derive analytic solutions of stochastic mutation-selection networks that describe early events of cancer formation. A main assumption is that cancer is initiated in tissue compartments, where only a relatively small number of cells are at risk of mutating into cells that escape from homeostatic regulation. In this case, the evolutionary dynamics can be approximated by a low-dimensional stochastic process with a linear Kolmogorov forward equation that can be solved analytically. Most of the time, the cell population is homogeneous with respect to relevant mutations. Occasionally, such homogeneous states are connected by 'stochastic tunnels'. We give a precise analysis of the existence of tunnels and calculate the rate of tunneling. Finally, we calculate the conditions for chromosomal instability (CIN) to precede inactivation of the first tumor suppressor gene. In this case, CIN is an early event and a driving force of cancer progression. The techniques developed in this paper can be used to study arbitrarily complex mutation-selection networks of the somatic evolution of cancer.

Genetic heterogeneity in lung and colorectal carcinoma as revealed by microsatellite analysis in plasma or tumor tissue DNA

BACKGROUND

Determination of tumor clonality has implications for molecular characterization and the optimal treatment of cancer. Allelotyping allows detection of the two alleles, maternal and paternal, and provides additional information regarding clonal genetic defects. The presence of allelic imbalances (AI) in tumors is a general event, but is not necessary at the same allele (alternative AI). The authors' goal was to determine whether the presence of alternative AI (AA) was a marker of heterogeneity and prognosis.

METHODS

To further analyze the heterogeneity of lung tumors, tumor DNA released in the plasma was compared with primary tumor DNA from 24 lung carcinoma patients. The comparison was performed by allelotyping using 12 microsatellites targeting 9 chromosomal regions, taking in each case leukocyte DNA as reference. To extend and confirm these observations, 26 primary colorectal carcinomas with paired synchronous liver metastasis were analyzed using an enlarged panel of 33 microsatellites.

RESULTS

AA were observed in 40% (20 of 50) of all patients, in 25% (6 of 24) of lung carcinoma patients but at a higher level, and in 54% (14 of 26) of colorectal carcinoma patients. They affected different chromosome localizations and each tumor stage. In both types of cancer, patients with AA had a higher AI mean frequency in their primary tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of AA is an original marker of heterogeneous tumors, demonstrating that independent events occurred on specific genetic sites required for cancer progression.

Centrosome replication, genomic instability and cancer

Karyotypic alterations, including whole chromosome loss or gain, ploidy changes, and a variety of chromosome aberrations are common in cancer cells. If proliferating cells fail to coordinate centrosome duplication with DNA replication, this will inevitably lead to a change in ploidy, and the formation of monopolar or multipolar spindles will generally provoke abnormal segregation of chromosomes. Indeed, it has long been recognized that errors in the centrosome duplication cycle may be an important cause of aneuploidy and thus contribute to cancer formation. This view has recently received fresh impetus with the description of supernumerary centrosomes in almost all solid human tumors. As the primary microtubule organizing center of most eukaryotic cells, the centrosome assures symmetry and bipolarity of the cell division process, a function that is essential for accurate chromosome segregation. In addition, a growing body of evidence indicates that centrosomes might be important for initiating S phase and completing cytokinesis. Centrosomes undergo duplication precisely once before cell division. Recent reports have revealed that this process is linked to the cell division cycle via cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) 2 activity that couples centriole duplication to the onset of DNA replication at the G(1)/S phase transition. Alterations in G(1)/S phase regulating proteins like the retinoblastoma protein, cyclins D and E, cdk4 and 6, cdk inhibitors p16(INK4A) and p15(INK4B), and p53 are among the most frequent aberrations observed in human malignancies. These alterations might not only lead to unrestrained proliferation, but also cause karyotypic instability by uncontrolled centrosome replication. Since several excellent reports on cell cycle regulation and cancer have been published, this review will focus on the role of centrosomes in cell cycle progression, as well as causes and consequences of aberrant centrosome replication in human neoplasias.

Analysis of allelic imbalance in patients with colorectal cancer according to stage and presence of synchronous liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between number and location of allelic imbalances (AI) and local tumor progression according to Astler-Coller classification.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Spontaneous errors in DNA replication (i.e., allelic imbalance or microsatellite instability) have been suggested to play an important role in carcinomatous transformation as reflecting alterations of gene function.

METHODS

One hundred two consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma undergoing surgical resection were included in this study. Patients were distributed according to the Astler-Coller classification as stages A (n = 7), B1 (n = 15), B2 (n = 24), C (n = 31), and D (n = 25). Fluorescent polymerase chain reaction was performed on frozen tumor, normal colon mucosa, and blood DNA at 35 microsatellite markers. Allelic imbalance frequency was compared with tumor staging.

RESULTS

The percentage of AI was significantly higher in stage D than in A/B1 and B2. In addition, the percentage of AI was significantly higher in 10 synchronous colorectal liver metastases than in stage A/B1 and B2 tumors. However, the allelotyping revealed a subgroup of A/B1 tumors with a high AI frequency. Statistical analysis showed that the presence of AI at microsatellites D1S305, D2S138, D3S1282, D17S790, and D22S928 presented a significantly positive correlation with stages.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of AI significantly correlates with tumor progression of colorectal cancer. Primary tumors with synchronous colorectal liver metastases showed a higher percentage of AI, suggesting that a frequency of AI greater than 35% with this selection of markers indicates a high risk of local progression and of development of metastases.

APC, signal transduction and genetic instability in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer arises through a gradual series of histological changes, each of which is accompanied by a specific genetic alteration. In general, an intestinal cell needs to comply with two essential requirements to develop into a cancer: it must acquire selective advantage to allow for the initial clonal expansion, and genetic instability to allow for multiple hits in other genes that are responsible for tumour progression and malignant transformation. Inactivation of APC--the gene responsible for most cases of colorectal cancer--might fulfil both requirements.

Assessments of clonal composition of colorectal adenomas by FISH analysis of chromosomes 1, 7, 13 and 20

Chromosome banding analysis has shown that numerical aberrations, in particular gains of chromosomes 7, 13 and 20, are common in colorectal adenomas but cannot provide reliable information on the size of the abnormal clones in vivo. We examined interphase nuclei from 70 colorectal adenomas, of which 64 had been previously karyotyped, using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for the pericentromeric regions of chromosomes 1, 7, 13 and 20. Gain of chromosome 7 was seen in 34% of the analyzed adenomas, +13 was seen in 44% and trisomy 20 was found in 32% of the adenomas, verifying that the trisomies are in vivo phenomena. The median proportion of cells with trisomy was larger than 50%. A comparison with the G-banding analysis showed a good correlation between the results yielded by the 2 methods. Based on the clonal size and karyotypic findings, a likely order of events during clonal evolution could be ascribed to each case. More than 1 numerical aberration was detected by FISH analysis in 16 adenomas. In 6 adenomas, a clone with only trisomy 7 was present alongside a clone with additional gain(s) of chromosomes 13 and/or 20. Seven cases had gain of chromosome 13 and/or gain of chromosome 20 in the largest clone, suggesting that a clone with either of these changes was present before the changes in chromosome 7 copy number took place. On the basis of the results of this combined meta- and interphase cytogenetic study, we conclude that gains of chromosomes 7, 13 and 20 are common in colorectal adenomas and that the trisomies usually are present in a large proportion of the cells. They seem to be primary chromosome aberrations in some adenomas, whereas in others they arise secondarily as part of the clonal evolution. Although the first gain usually is of chromosome 7, it is evident that it is the end result of the chromosomal aberrations, not the exact sequence in which they occur, that determines the pathogenetic consequences.

Modeling chromosomal instability and epithelial carcinogenesis in the telomerase-deficient mouse

Human carcinomas are intimately linked to advancing age. These cancers have complex cytogenetic profiles, including aneuploidy and chromosomal structural aberrations. While aged humans sustain a high rate of carcinomas, mice bearing common tumor suppressor gene mutations typically develop soft tissue sarcomas and lymphomas. One marked species distinction between human and mouse that bears on the predisposition to carcinogenesis lies in the radical differences in length and regulation of the telomere, nucleoprotein complexes that cap the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes. Recent cancer modeling studies in the telomerase knockout p53 mutant mice revealed that telomere dynamics might be relevant to carcinogenesis. In these mice, there is a shift in the tumor spectrum towards epithelial carcinomas, and these cancers emerge with complex cytogenetic profiles classical for human carcinomas. In this review, we suggest that the mechanism of fusion-bridge-breakage-translocation, triggered by critically short telomeres, may be one of the generators of genomic instability commonly seen in human carcinomas.

Genetic instabilities in human cancers

Whether and how human tumours are genetically unstable has been debated for decades. There is now evidence that most cancers may indeed be genetically unstable, but that the instability exists at two distinct levels. In a small subset of tumours, the instability is observed at the nucleotide level and results in base substitutions or deletions or insertions of a few nucleotides. In most other cancers, the instability is observed at the chromosome level, resulting in losses and gains of whole chromosomes or large portions thereof. Recognition and comparison of these instabilities are leading to new insights into tumour pathogenesis.

Cytogenetic analysis of colorectal adenomas: karyotypic comparisons of synchronous tumors

The phenotypic progression of colorectal tumors is driven by their step-by-step acquisition of genomic alterations. These pathogenetically important mutations are at the same time markers of tumor clonality. The aim of this study was to describe the clonal relation among synchronous colorectal adenomas. Twenty-four colorectal adenomas from 11 patients were subjected to chromosome banding analysis. Clonal chromosome abnormalities were found in 20 tumors. Recurrent structural rearrangements involved chromosomes 1, 13, 17, and 18. The most common numerical changes were gain of chromosomes 7, 13, 20, and 3 and loss of chromosome 18. Eight adenomas had subclones as evidence of clonal evolution. Similar clones in separate polyps were seen in tumors from 6 patients; these adenomas were always located in the same part of the large bowel. In 2 patients, both with one rectal adenoma and one adenoma in the colon, no karyotypic similarity between the lesions was found. Our findings indicate that whereas close, but macroscopically distinct, synchronous colorectal adenomas usually have a common pathway of progression, perhaps even the same clonal origin, large bowel adenomas at a considerable distance from one another exhibit karyotypic differences, indicating that they arise independently.

Allelic imbalance and cytogenetic deletion of 1p in colorectal adenomas: a target region identified between DIS199 and DIS234

Both cytogenetic and molecular genetic analyses have shown that many colorectal adenomas carry an acquired deletion distally in the short arm of one chromosome 1, but the two methods have never been brought to bear on the same tumors. The major part of this study was the analysis of 53 previously short-term cultured and karyotyped colorectal adenomas for allelic imbalance at eight microsatellite loci in 1p. Allelic imbalances were detected in seven of the 12 adenomas that had cytogenetically visible abnormalities of chromosome 1, as well as in four adenomas that either had a normal karyotype (one case) or had clonal chromosome abnormalities that did not seem to involve chromosome 1 (three cases); i.e., 30% of the adenomas had abnormalities involving 1p by the combined approach. A minimal region of overlap seemed to map to between DIS199 and DIS234, suggesting that this is a relevant target region. This genomic area contains the human homologue of the tumor modifier gene Mom1 (1p35-36.1), which, in mice, modifies the number of intestinal tumors in multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min)-mutated animals. To evaluate whether the imbalances corresponded to interstitial deletions of 1p material, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization with a pericentromeric probe (15 adenomas) and a telomeric probe (6 adenomas) on uncultured cells from the 16 adenomas with chromosome 1 abnormalities. Except for three adenomas that had already been shown by banding analysis to have a trisomic pattern, two centromere 1 signals were invariably found. In the cases hybridized with the 1p-telomeric probe, we found the same frequencies of telomeric and centromeric signals, in agreement with the interpretation that the deletions were interstitial. One of the 53 adenomas had genomic instability, seen as new alleles at five of eight microsatellite loci. A comparison of the genetic findings with clinicopathologic data indicated that adenomas in the rectum have 1p abnormalities more often than do adenomas of the sigmoid colon, and that adenomas with 1p changes are larger than adenomas without abnormalities of chromosome 1.