Phase II trial of carboplatin plus oral etoposide for elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer

A systematic review of survival following anti-cancer treatment for small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival following treatment recommended by the European Society of Medical Oncology for SCLC in order to determine a benchmark for novel therapies to be compared with.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting overall survival following chemotherapy for SCLC were included. We calculated survival at 30 and 90-days along with 1-year, 2-year and median.

RESULTS

We identified 160 for inclusion. There were minimal 30-day deaths. Survival was 99 % (95 %CI 98.0-99.0 %, I²33.9 %, n = 77) and 90 % (95 %CI 89.0-92.0 %, I²79.5 %, n = 73) at 90 days for limited (LD-SCLC) and extensive stage (ED-SCLC) respectively. The median survival for LD-SCLC was 18.1 months (95 %CI 17.0-19.1 %, I²77.3 %, n = 110) and early thoracic radiotherapy (thoracic radiotherapy 18.4 months (95 %CI 17.3-19.5, I²78.4 %, n = 100)) vs no radiotherapy 11.7 months (95 %CI 9.1-14.3, n = 10), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI 19.7 months vs No PCI 13.0 months (95 %CI 18.5-21.0, I²75.7 %, n = 78 and 95 %CI 10.5-16.6, I²81.1 %, n = 15 respectively)) and better performance status (PS0-1 22.5 months vs PS0-4 15.3 months (95 %CI 18.7-26.1, I²72.4 %, n = 11 and 95 %CI 11.5-19.1 I²77.9 %, n = 13)) augmented this. For ED-SCLC the median survival was 9.6 months (95 %CI 8.9-10.3 %, I²95.2 %, n = 103) and this improved when irinotecan + cisplatin was used, however studies that used this combination were mostly conducted in Asian populations where survival was better. Survival was not improved with the addition of thoracic radiotherapy or PCI. Survival for both stages of cancer was better in modern studies and Asian cohorts. It was poorer for studies administering carboplatin + etoposide but this regimen was used in studies that had fewer patient selection criteria.

CONCLUSION

Early thoracic radiotherapy and PCI should be offered to people with LD-SCLC in accordance with guideline recommendations. The benefit of the aforementioned therapies to treat ED-SCLC and the use of chemotherapy in people with poor PS is less clear.

Role of Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients With Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

To investigate outcomes for elderly patients treated with chemotherapy (CT) alone versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the modern era by using a large national database.

Patients and Methods

Elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer clinical stage I to III who received CT or CRT were identified in the National Cancer Data Base between 2003 and 2011. Hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression with clustering by reporting facility was performed to identify factors associated with treatment selection. Overall survival (OS) of patients receiving CT versus CRT was compared by using the log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression, and propensity score matching.

Results

A total of 8,637 patients were identified, among whom 3,775 (43.7%) received CT and 4,862 (56.3%) received CRT. The odds of receiving CRT decreased with increasing age, clinical stage III disease, female sex, and the presence of medical comorbidities (all P < .01). Use of CRT was associated with increased OS compared with CT on univariable and multivariable analysis (median OS, 15.6 v 9.3 months; 3-year OS, 22.0% v 6.3%; log-rank P < .001; Cox P < .001). Propensity score matching identified a matched cohort of 6,856 patients and confirmed a survival benefit associated with CRT (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.55; P < .001). Subset analysis of CRT treatment sequence showed that patients alive 4 months after diagnosis derived a survival benefit with concurrent CRT over sequential CRT (median OS, 17.0 v 15.4 months; log-rank P = .01).

Conclusion

In elderly patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer, modern CRT appears to confer an additional OS advantage beyond that achieved with CT alone in a large population-based cohort. Our findings suggest that CRT should be the preferred strategy in elderly patients who are expected to tolerate the toxicities of the combined approach.

Uptake and tolerance of chemotherapy in elderly patients with small cell lung cancer and impact on survival

The treatment of elderly cancer patients is complicated by many factors. We sought to assess the uptake and tolerance of chemotherapy among patients 75 years and older diagnosed with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in years 2004–2008 in Alberta, Canada, and assess their survival. All patients who met the above criteria and had an oncologist-consult were included. Data were obtained from the Alberta Cancer Registry and chart review. A total of 171 patients were included in the study, 117 (68%) of whom began chemotherapy. Of those, 52% completed all cycles, 66% did not have any dose reductions, and 31% completed all cycles at the recommended dose. The risk of death for patients who did not complete all cycles of chemotherapy was 2.72 (95% CI: 1.52–4.87) and for those who completed all cycles but with a reduced dose was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.57–1.82) relative to those who completed chemotherapy at full dose after adjusting for several demographic/clinical factors. Our results suggest that a significant proportion of elderly patients are able to tolerate chemotherapy and receive a survival benefit from it while those who experience toxicity may receive a survival benefit from a reduction in chemotherapy dose as opposed to stopping treatment.

Extensive disease small cell lung cancer dose-response relationships: implications for resistance mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Some studies (but not others) suggested that high doses are beneficial in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We hypothesized that dose-response curve (DRC) shape reflects resistance mechanisms.

METHODS

We reviewed published SCLC clinical trials and converted response rates into estimated mean tumor cell kill, assuming killing is proportional to reduction in tumor volume. Mean % cell survival was plotted versus planned dose intensity. Nonlinear and linear meta-regression analyses (weighted according to the number of patients in each study) were used to assess DRC characteristics.

RESULTS

Although associations between dose and cell survival were not statistically significant, DRCs sloped downward for five of seven agents across all doses and for all seven when lowest doses were excluded. Maximum mean cell kill across all drugs and doses was approximately 90%, suggesting that there may be a maximum achievable tumor cell kill irrespective of number of agents or drug doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Downward DRC slopes suggest that maintaining relatively high doses may possibly maximize palliation, although the associations between dose and slope did not achieve statistical significance, and slopes for most drugs tended to be shallow. DRC flattening at higher doses would preclude cure and would suggest that "saturable passive resistance" (deficiency of factors required for cell killing) limits maximum achievable cell kill. An example of factors that could flatten the DRC at higher doses and lead to saturable passive resistance would be presence of quiescent, noncycling cells.

Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSES

This guideline is for the management of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is based on currently available information. As part of the guideline, an evidence-based review of the literature was commissioned that enables the reader to assess the evidence as we have attempted to put the clinical implications into perspective.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of the available literature and the previous American College of Chest Physicians guidelines of SCLC. Controversial and less understood areas of the management of SCLC were then subject to an exhaustive review of the literature and detail analyses. Experts in evidence-based analyses compiled the accompanying systematic review titled "Evidence for Management of SCLC." The evidence was then assessed by a panel of experts to incorporate "clinical relevance." The resultant guidelines were then scored according to the grading system outlined by the American College of Chest Physicians grading system task force.

RESULTS

SCLC accounts for 13 to 20% of all lung cancers. Highly smoking related and initially responsive to treatment, it leads to death rapidly in 2 to 4 months without treatment. SCLC is staged as limited-stage and extensive-stage disease. Limited-stage disease is treated with curative intent with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, with approximately 20% of patients achieving a cure. For all patients with limited-stage disease, median survival is 16 to 22 months. Extensive-stage disease is primarily treated with chemotherapy with a high initial response rate of 60 to 70% but with a median survival of 10 months. All patients achieving a complete remission should be offered prophylactic cranial irradiation. Relapsed or refractory SCLC has a uniformly poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

In this section, evidence-based guidelines for the staging and treatment of SCLC are outlined. Limited-stage SCLC is treated with curative intent. Extensive-stage SCLC has high initial responses to chemotherapy but with an ultimately dismal prognosis with few survivors beyond 2 years.

[Randomised phase II study evaluating oral combination chemotherapy (CCNU, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) and intravenous chemotherapy as second-line treatment for relapsed small cell bronchial carcinoma (Trial GFPC0501)]

BACKGROUND

There is no standard second-line treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The prognosis of these patients is poor and special attention should be paid to both quality of life and economic factors.

METHODS

The aim of this phase II randomised trial (GFPC0501) is to compare, in patients with progressive SCLC after first-line platinum based chemotherapy, oral multi drug chemotherapy (CCNU, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) and classical intravenous chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine (CAV) in terms of tolerability, efficacy (response rate, median one year survival and overall survival), quality of life and consumption of health care resources. Based on a two-stage Bryant and Day approach, this study will require a total of 138 patients with an interim analysis of the first 38.

EXPECTED RESULTS

This trial will provide information on several aspects of second-line chemotherapy for patients with SCLC. Thirty six patients have been enrolled in 16 centres by December 2006 and the results of the interim analysis will be available in June 2007.

Randomised phase III trial of carboplatin plus etoposide vs split doses of cisplatin plus etoposide in elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: JCOG 9702

We compared the efficacy and the safety of a carboplatin plus etoposide regimen (CE) vs split doses of cisplatin plus etoposide (SPE) in elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). Eligibility criteria included: untreated ED-SCLC; age ⩾70 and performance status 0–2, or age <70 and PS 3. The CE arm received carboplatin area under the curve of five intravenously (IV) on day 1 and etoposide 80 mg m⁻² IV on days 1–3. The SPE arm received cisplatin 25 mg m⁻² IV on days 1–3 and etoposide 80 mg m⁻² IV on days 1–3. Both regimens were given with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in a 21–28 day cycle for four courses. A total of 220 patients were randomised. Median age was 74 years and 74% had a PS of 0 or 1. Major grade 3–4 toxicities were (%CE/%SPE): leucopenia 54/51, neutropenia 95/90, thrombocytopenia 56/16, infection 7/6. There was no significant difference (CE/SPE) in the response rate (73/73%) and overall survival (median 10.6/9.9 mo; P=0.54). Palliation scores were very similar between the arms. Although the SPE regimen is still considered to be the standard treatment in elderly or poor-risk patients with ED-SCLC, the CE regimen can be an alternative for this population considering the risk–benefit balance.

Insight into the treatment of cancer in older patients: Developments in the last decade

In the last decades there has been an increased interest in the treatment of elderly cancer patients and a change in attitude of both clinicians and their patients has occurred. Drugs are now available that might be considered "elderly-friendly" and the enormous advances in surgical procedures and supportive treatments over the recent years have enabled adverse effects to be minimized. A Geriatric Assessment is increasingly used as a tool to define those patients who are more suitable for aggressive chemotherapy or, on the contrary, palliative treatment. For almost all cancers, older patients are better treated today than they were in the past, even though we are still far from optimal management. Despite the perceived barriers to including elderly patients in clinical trials, there are few data to support excluding them. We must not permit increased age in cancer patients to continue to be an important and independent risk factor for receiving inadequate care.

A phase I trial of carboplatin and etoposide for elderly (≥75 year-old) patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The combination of carboplatin and etoposide is currently considered the most appropriate regimen for treating elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Previous reports on elderly patients, 70 years or older, found that the recommended dose was close to that of younger patients. Then, we conducted a phase I study of carboplatin and etoposide in elderly patients, 75 years or older, with SCLC. This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).

METHODS

Twenty-six patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria, chemotherapy-naive, performance status (PS) of 0-2, age>or=75, and adequate organ functions were enrolled. Patients' characteristics were: male/female=21/5; PS 0/1/2=9/11/6; median age (range)=78 (75-82); and limited/extensive stage=16/10. The patients intravenously received carboplatin with a target AUC of 4 or 5 mg min/ml (Chatelut formula) on day 1 and etoposide at 80-120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3. Therapy was repeated four times in every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The MTD of carboplatin/etoposide was AUC=5/80, 4/110, and 4/120. The DLTs were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, leukopenia, and febrile neutropenia. Overall, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, neutropenia (>or=4 days), leukopenia (>or=4 days), and febrile neutropenia occurred in 27, 20, 7, and 13% of cases at MTD levels, respectively, and 0% at other levels. Twenty of 26 patients showed objective responses (2CR, 18PR; RR=77%).

CONCLUSION

A dose of carboplatin of AUC=4 and etoposide of 100 mg/m2 was recommended in this regimen.

Small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung carcinoma is an aggressive form of lung cancer that is strongly associated with cigarette smoking and has a tendency for early dissemination. Increasing evidence has implicated autocrine growth loops, proto-oncogenes, and tumour-suppressor genes in its development. At presentation, the vast majority of patients are symptomatic, and imaging typically reveals a hilar mass. Pathology, in most cases of samples obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy, should be undertaken by pathologists with pulmonary expertise, with the provision of additional tissue for immunohistochemical stains as needed. Staging should aim to identify any evidence of distant disease, by imaging of the chest, upper abdomen, head, and bones as appropriate. Limited-stage disease should be treated with etoposide and cisplatin and concurrent early chest irradiation. All patients who achieve complete remission should be considered for treatment with prophylactic cranial irradiation, owing to the high frequency of brain metastases in this disease. Extensive-stage disease should be managed by combination chemotherapy, with a regimen such as etoposide and cisplatin administered for four to six cycles. Thereafter, patients with progressive or recurrent disease should be treated with additional chemotherapy. For patients who survive long term, careful monitoring for development of a second primary tumour is necessary, with further investigation and treatment as appropriate.

A phase I study of 3-day topotecan and cisplatin in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this phase I study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged over 75 years with previously untreated SCLC were enrolled in this study. Both topotecan and cisplatin were administered on days 1-3 and repeated every 3 weeks. The starting dose of topotecan was 0.5 mg/m2/day, while cisplatin was fixed at the dose of 20 mg/m2/day. Patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC received thoracic irradiation after the completion of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-one elderly patients were enrolled in this study and received a total of 59 cycles. The major hematological toxicity was neutropenia and non-hematological toxicities including diarrhea were generally mild and reversible. The MTD of topotecan was determined as 1.2 mg/m2/day. The recommended phase II study dose of topotecan was determined as 1.0 mg/m2/day with cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day daily for 3 days. An objective response was observed in 6 of 10 patients (60%) with LD-SCLC and 6 of 11 (55%) with extensive disease (ED) SCLC. The median survival time in patients with LD-SCLC and those with ED-SCLC were 16.0 and 11.0 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination chemotherapy of 3-day topotecan and cisplatin appears to be tolerable and effective in elderly patients with SCLC.

Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for SCLC. In limited disease, the median survival time is about 12-16 months, with a 4%-5% long-term survival rate; in extensive disease the median survival time is 7-11 months. More than 50% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed when they are over the age of 65, and about 30% are over 70. Elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly compared with their younger counterparts, because of age-related progressive reductions in organ function and comorbidities. The standard therapy for limited disease is combined chemoradiotherapy, followed by prophylactic brain irradiation for patients achieving complete responses. In the elderly, the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy must be carefully evaluated, considering the slight survival benefit and potential for substantial toxicity incurred with this treatment. The best approach is to design clinical trials that specifically include geriatric assessment to develop active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for elderly SCLC patients. Survival improvement for SCLC patients requires a better understanding of tumor biology and the subsequent development of novel therapeutic strategies. Several targeted agents have been introduced into clinical trials in SCLC, but a minority of these new agents offers a promise of improved outcomes, and negative results are reported more commonly than positive ones. This review focuses on the main issues in the treatment of elderly SCLC patients.

Treatment of small cell lung cancer in the elderly based on a critical literature review of clinical trials

At diagnosis, 25-40% of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are 70 years of age or older, and many of them have been undertreated because of fear of excessive toxicity associated with chemotherapy. Papers retrieved by a Medline search using the key words "elderly or older" and "small cell lung cancer" and by a manual search were classified into the three types: (1) case-series studies, (2) subgroup analyses of phase II and phase III trials by age, and (3) prospective clinical trials in the elderly. Treatment regimens, delivery, toxicity, antitumor activity, and patient survival were reviewed in elderly patients with good and poor general condition. The standard chemotherapy regimens for the general population could be applied to elderly patients in good general condition (performance status of 0-1, normal organ function, and no comorbidity), but etoposide and carboplatin regimen with dose modification was frequently used for unselected elderly patients. A combination of full-dose thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy was the treatment of choice for limited SCLC in the elderly. Full cycles of chemotherapy were tolerable by 80% of the elderly patients with good general condition, but two cycles may be optimal for unselected elderly patients. Although the evidence levels based on clinical trials available today are low, these results are helpful for clinical practice and future clinical trials for elderly patients with SCLC.

Curative approaches to lung cancer in the elderly

Lung cancer is a common disease in elderly patients, and the increase in the size of the elderly population will lead to an increased proportion of elderly among lung cancer patients in the future. The prognosis of lung cancer is still poor, but curative approaches are feasible for patients with local stage NSCLC and for some patients with limited disease (LD) SCLC. The evidence for these curatively-intended approaches is derived from studies that are usually performed with highly selected patients. Elderly patients are underrepresented, and in daily clinical practice elderly patients are less likely to be treated with full standard approaches. We used the data from studies that focused particularly on the elderly, or provided subgroup information on age, to analyze the feasibility of applying current standard approaches to the elderly. We also discuss alternative approaches. Age alone is a very uncertain prognostic criterion for outcome or tolerability of treatment. It is much more important to obtain a comprehensive geriatric assessment of each individual patient. When adequate patient selection is provided, standard treatment approaches appear to be feasible for elderly (>70 years) patients with good performance status.

Treatment of lung cancer in elderly part II: small cell lung cancer

There is a general trend worldwide of an increasing incidence of elderly population. Age is the greatest risk factor for cancer; therefore, this demographic shift is a main reason for an increase of cancer incidence. Lung cancer is a typical disease of the elderly patients. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancer cases. This review summarises the issues of treatment of SCLC in elderly. The number of randomised phase III trials concerning treatment of SCLC in elderly patients are very limited. Although currently most treatment decisions are based on lower grades of evidence, some conclusions can be drawn from the current studies. Age alone is a very uncertain prognostic criteria for outcome or tolerability of treatment. Much more important is the geriatric assessment of each individual patient. Current treatment standards for limited disease (LD)-SCLC (polychemotherapy plus local thoracic irradiation and additional prophylactic cranial irradiation in case of complete remission) seems to be also feasible for 'fit' elderly (>70 years) LD-SCLC patients with a good performance and full functional capacities. There are preliminary data indicating that a similar outcome in elderly patients can probably be achieved a with reduced number of treatment schedules (e.g. 2 instead of 4 cycles in combination with radiotherapy. Surgical resection is also feasible in selected elderly patients with very early stage SCLC, where this maybe an appropriate approach, although no phase III data are available, which demonstrated the benefit of additional surgery compared to chemotherapy alone in early stage SCLC. In patients with extensive disease-SCLC age alone does not necessarily restrict the use of multiagent regimen, although the risk of haematological toxicity seems to be higher than in the younger patients. When standard treatment is not feasible due to co-morbidity or loss of functional capacity, several alternative combination regimens are available, which appear to be slightly superior to single agent treatment, although randomised data for elderly on that issue are sparse. Carboplatin and etoposide seems currently the most appropriate two-drug combination in elderly patients, but there are a variety of active and low toxic third generation agents like taxanes, gemcitabine and vinorelbine which are active in both, non-small cell lung cancer and SCLC. For the comparison of trials in elderly patients it will be of key importance to include a comprehensive and standardised geriatric assessment in such studies.

Effectiveness of preoperative chemotherapy using carboplatin (CBDCA) and surgery against an esophageal small cell carcinoma

A 63-year-old man presented to our hospital with persistent dysphagia. Radiologic and endoscopic examination disclosed a 2.0-cm exophytic tumor in the middle third of the esophagus. An endscopically obtained biopsy specimen was found to represent undifferentiated small cell carcinoma. Computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and cervical region was performed, as were gallium and bone scintigraphy. Metastasis to an adjacent lymph node was detected, without metastasis to distant organs. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin (CBDCA) (400 mg/m2) and etoposide (VP-16) (100 mg/m2), endoscopy and barium-swallow esophagography showed regression. Thoracic esophagectomy then was performed with mediastinal, abdominal and cervical lymph node dissection. The resected tumor was polypoid, measuring 0.5 x 0.5 cm. The lesion consisted mainly of small anaplastic cells, but included a small focus of squamous cell carcinoma. The patient has survived for more than 7 months with no further treatment and no evidence of recurrent disease.

Small cell lung cancer

Among patients with lung cancers, the proportion of those with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has decreased over the last decade. SCLC is staged as limited-stage disease and extensive-stage disease. Standard staging procedures for SCLC include CT scans of the chest and abdomen, bone scan, and CT scan or MRI of the brain. The role for positron emission tomography scanning in the staging of SCLC has yet to be defined. Limited-stage disease is treated with curative intent with chemotherapy and radiation therapy, with approximately 20% of patients achieving a cure. The median survival time for patients with limited-stage disease is approximately 18 months. Extensive-stage disease is treated primarily with chemotherapy, with a high initial response rate of 60 to 70% and a complete response rate of 20 to 30%, but with a median survival time of approximately 9 months. Patients achieving a complete remission should be offered prophylactic cranial irradiation. Currently, there is no role for maintenance treatment or bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of patients with SCLC. Relapsed or refractory SCLC has a uniformly poor prognosis. In this section, evidence-based guidelines for the staging and treatment of SCLC are outlined.

Carboplatin plus vinorelbine plus G-CSF in elderly patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a poorly tolerated regimen. Results of a multicentre phase II study

PURPOSE AND METHODS

A multicentre phase II trial (single-stage design) was undertaken to test the activity and toxicity of carboplatin (AUC 5 according to Calvert, day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) with lenograstim support, every 3 weeks in the first line treatment of elderly patients, aged 65 or more, affected by extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). The primary end-point of the trial was the objective response rate. Twenty-three responses among 37 patients were considered necessary to proceed to a phase III trial.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were enrolled (median age 70 years). Treatment was remarkably toxic. Three patients died while on treatment. Eleven patients (39.3%, 95% exact confidence interval (CI): 21.5-59.4) had an objective response, that was complete in 2 cases. Median time to progression was 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.3-6.7). Median survival was 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.8-14.4).

CONCLUSION

Carboplatin plus vinorelbine is poorly tolerated and not sufficiently active to warrant phase III comparison with standard chemotherapy regimens in elderly patients with extensive SCLC.

Chemotherapy of lung cancer in the elderly

In the last few years it has become evident that the elderly lung cancer patient represents a peculiar individual with regard to both the tolerance to the tumor and its treatment. Age per se cannot be considered an adverse prognostic factor, however, the physiologic impairment of the functions of important organs like liver, kidney, bone marrow etc., may render more unpredictable the treatment-related toxicity, and moreover, the higher incidence of concomitant diseases which occurs with aging certainly translates in a worse survival outcome. As a consequence, a careful multidimensional evaluation (functional, emotional, socioeconomic status, comorbidities, etc.) should be preliminarily performed in patients eligible for chemotherapy treatment. Several approaches have been tested in elderly lung cancer patients. Different therapeutic attitudes exist, which first take into account the kind of histology (small cell lung cancer, SCLC and non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC). Of course a more aggressive approach can be sometimes justified in an elderly SCLC patient in view of the high responsiveness of this disease, while more concerns exist about the use of aggressive chemotherapy regimen in elderly patients with NSCLC histology. In view of these considerations, more clinical trials are being planned to specifically assess the role of chemotherapy in this subset of patients.A brief review of the most important phase II and III trials conducted in elderly patients with either SCLC or NSCLC is provided here. A description of the most important still unsolved issues will be made, and an outline of the ongoing clinical trials in these patients will be provided.

Management of small-cell lung cancer in the elderly

More than 50% of lung cancer patients are diagnosed over the age of 65 and about 30% over 70. Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 20-25% of lung carcinomas. Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for SCLC. Usually in the elderly it is difficult to administer the same chemotherapy administered to younger patients because elderly patients tolerate chemotherapy poorly. The empirical reduction of drug doses may be criticized. The best approach is to design specific trials in order to develop active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimens for SCLC elderly patients. The standard therapy in limited disease is combined chemo-radiotherapy followed by prophylactic brain irradiation for patients achieving a complete response. In the elderly, the addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy must be accurately evaluated, considering the slight survival improvement and the potential relevant toxicity.

Carboplatin-etoposide combination in small cell lung cancer patients older than 70 years: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

No standard treatment is defined for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Carboplatin and etoposide are highly active agents against SCLC. In this study, we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a combination of these two agents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four untreated patients with limited or extensive SCLC and median age of 73.9 years entered the study. Chemotherapy consisted of carboplatin i.v. on day 1 (AUC 5 using Calvert's formula) and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) given orally on days 1-5, every 4 weeks, and thoracic irradiation was given to limited disease patients after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The overall response rates was 59% (95% CI: 43-76). The median survival for all patients was 37 weeks (range 3-76 weeks). The toxicity was mainly haematological with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 59% of courses, febrile neutropenia in 15% of courses, and toxic death in 9% of patients.

CONCLUSION

The results of this regimen are disappointing with worse response and survival, and more haematological toxicity than expected and previously reported, despite the use of Calvert's formula. Possible explanations are the use of etoposide per os rather than i.v., the frequent comorbidities of older patients and the inclusion of patients with poor prognosis factors.

Advances in systemic therapy of small cell cancer of the lung

Over the last 20 years, progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer has been painfully slow. Despite dramatic initial responses to chemotherapy, most patients relapse quickly with an overall 5-year survival of about 5%. Recent trials however offer some hope at changing this picture. Combining standard regimens with newer agents has doubled median survival in some cases. The use of novel targeted agents holds the promise of significantly increasing the survival in this disease, with manageable toxicity. This review outlines current treatment strategies, summarizes recent clinical trials and offers a view of what the next 5 years may hold for the treatment of small cell lung cancer.

Etoposide phosphate with carboplatin in the treatment of elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Although the average age of lung cancer patients is increasing, many elderly patients remain undertreated, mainly because of the fear of higher treatment toxicity in this category of patients. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a combination therapy with carboplatin (C) and etoposide phosphate (EP) in elderly patients with Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients older than 70 years with stage IIIB/IV SCLC received a combination of EP (100 mg/m2 D1, D2, D3) and C (D1, dose calculated according to the Calvert formula). Response rate, survival and toxicity were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (mean age 76 years, range 70-88 years) received a total of 162 cycles. Eighteen patients (47%) received the six scheduled cycles. Thirty patients were evaluable for efficacy (2 CR and 20 PR). The median survival was 237 days and the one-year probability of survival was 26%. The most common adverse effect was transient grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, observed during 57% of evaluable cycles, while five episodes of febrile neutropenia also occurred, with one fatal (bacteremia). It is noteworthy that no renal or liver toxicity was observed, and no mucitis was noted. Unfortunately, a relatively high proportion of patients died shortly after the start of the study. Although most deaths seemed unrelated to the treatment, the possibility of its exacerbatory effect on comorbidities, especially cardiovascular, cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSION

The two-drug regimen of carboplatin and etoposide phosphate is feasible in most elderly patients with an acceptable toxicity, and the overall results suggest that patients even older than 70 years may benefit from full treatment. Therefore, consideration should be given to offering active treatment to most patients with SCLC, regardless of age but with special attention paid to comorbidities.

Phase II study of area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve-based carboplatin plus standard-dose intravenous etoposide in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The target area under the plasma-concentration-versus-time curve (AUC)-based dosing of carboplatin using Calvert's formula is expected to result in more acceptable toxicity and greater efficacy in elderly patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) than the body surface area-based dosing strategy. This phase II study was designed to determine the toxicity and efficacy of carboplatin based on Calvert's formula plus the standard dose of intravenous etoposide for elderly patients with SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Carboplatin, dosed to a target AUC of 5 x (24-hour creatinine clearance + 25), was given intravenously on day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) was given intravenously on days 1, 2, and 3. Patients aged >/= 70 years old with a performance status of 0 to 2 were eligible.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were enrolled onto the study. The patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 73 years; limited disease (LD), 16 patients; and extensive disease (ED), 20 patients. Grades 3 and 4 leukopenia occurred in 57% and 3% of patients, and grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 40% and 11% of patients, respectively. There was one treatment-related death due to hemoptysis. Other toxicities were relatively mild. There were two complete responses and 25 partial responses, for a response rate of 75%. The median survival time was 10.8 months (LD, 11.6 months; ED, 10.1 months), and the 1-year survival rate was 47%.

CONCLUSION

This carboplatin/etoposide combination chemotherapy is an active and relatively nontoxic regimen in elderly patients with SCLC, which suggests that the combination may be suitable for randomized controlled trials.