Cytogenetic and molecular genetic demonstration of polyclonality in an acinic cell carcinoma

Precise microdissection of human bladder carcinomas reveals divergent tumor subclones in the same tumor

BACKGROUND

Human bladder carcinoma is thought to arise from a field change that affects the entire urothelium. Whether independently transformed urothelial cell populations exist in the same patient is uncertain.

METHODS

We studied the clonality of urinary bladder carcinoma in 18 female patients who underwent cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma. None had multiple tumors. Tumor samples were obtained from different areas of the same tumor. Sixty-seven tumor samples were analyzed. Tumor genomic DNA was microdissected and extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slides. The clonality of urothelial tumors was evaluated on the basis of a polymorphism of the X chromosome-linked human androgen receptor gene (HUMARA) locus. The technique is dependent on digestion of DNA with the methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme HhaI, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of HUMARA locus, and detection of methylation of this locus. With this method, only the methylated HUMARA allele is selectively amplified by PCR.

RESULTS

Eleven of 18 patients were informative. Nonrandom inactivation of the X chromosome was found in 9 of the 11 informative patients (82%). Seven patients showed different patterns of nonrandom X chromosome inactivation for tumor samples obtained from different regions of the same tumor. Two patients showed the same pattern of nonrandom X chromosome inactivation in all samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Some muscle-invasive urothelial carcinomas may arise from independently transformed progenitor urothelial cells, supporting the "field effect" theory for bladder carcinogenesis.

Cytogenetic tetraclonality in a rare spindle cell variant of an anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid

We report a case of an unusual anaplastic carcinoma with spindle cell differentiation in an 85-year-old patient. Although the tumor showed sarcoma-like features its occurrence in the thyroid of an elderly person supported the diagnosis of an anaplastic carcinoma. This diagnosis is also supported by the results of cytogenetic studies that revealed four independent clones. Of these, three clones showed complex chromosomal rearrangements including translocations, deletions and inversions while the remaining clone only showed two balanced translocations. The patient is still alive after 13 months.

Are some breast carcinomas polyclonal in origin?

This editorial comments on the important study by Going et al. published in the present issue of the Journal [1]. Using a molecular genetic assay based on the X-chromosome inactivation principle, they found that 4 out of 12 breast carcinomas examined exhibited what the authors call "clonal mosaicism" that is, two or more monoclonal samples were mosaic (polyclonal) in respect of X chromosome inactivation between separate, morphologically homogeneous tumour areas. The authors very carefully discuss potential methodological errors that could have led to this surprising finding, which seems to run counter to the almost unanimously held conviction that carcinomas are monoclonal in origin, but none of these potential errors would explain the results. As often in such situations, the authors prudently state that further studies using independent analytical techniques are necessary to find out whether a significant proportion of mammary carcinomas are indeed polyclonal. However, there already exists a substantial body of evidence from cytogenetic studies of breast cancers indicating that many of them are polyclonal. Although there is still room for interpretation and some doubt remains as to exactly which role should be ascribed to the observed clonal heterogeneity in our models of carcinogenesis, it seems obvious that more attention than before ought to be paid to this now well documented fact.

The clonal origin and clonal evolution of epithelial tumours

While the origin of tumours, whether from one cell or many, has been a source of fascination for experimental oncologists for some time, in recent years there has been a veritable explosion of information about the clonal architecture of tumours and their antecedents, stimulated, in the main, by the ready accessibility of new molecular techniques. While most of these new results have apparently confirmed the monoclonal origin of human epithelial (and other) tumours, there are a significant number of studies in which this conclusion just cannot be made. Moreover, analysis of many articles show that the potential impact of such considerations as patch size and clonal evolution on determinations of clonality have largely been ignored, with the result that a number of these studies are confounded. However, the clonal architecture of preneoplastic lesions provide some interesting insights --many lesions which might have been hitherto regarded as hyperplasias are apparently clonal in derivation. If this is indeed true, it calls into some question our hopeful corollary that a monoclonal origin presages a neoplastic habitus. Finally, it is clear, for many reasons, that methods of analysis which involve the disaggregation of tissues, albeit microdissected, are far from ideal and we should be putting more effort into techniques where the clonal architecture of normal tissues, preneoplastic and preinvasive lesions and their derivative tumours can be directly visualized in situ.