Characterization of human soft-tissue sarcoma xenografts for use in secondary drug screening

Synovial Sarcoma Preclinical Modeling: Integrating Transgenic Mouse Models and Patient-Derived Models for Translational Research

Synovial sarcomas (SyS) are rare malignant tumors predominantly affecting children, adolescents, and young adults. The genetic hallmark of SyS is the t(X;18) translocation encoding the SS18-SSX fusion gene. The fusion protein interacts with both the BAF enhancer and polycomb repressor complexes, and either activates or represses target gene transcription, resulting in genome-wide epigenetic perturbations and altered gene expression. Several experimental in in vivo models, including conditional transgenic mouse models expressing the SS18-SSX fusion protein and spontaneously developing SyS, are available. In addition, patient-derived xenografts have been estab-lished in immunodeficient mice, faithfully reproducing the complex clinical heterogeneity. This review focuses on the main molecular features of SyS and the related preclinical in vivo and in vitro models. We will analyze the different conditional SyS mouse models that, after combination with some of the few other recurrent alterations, such as gains in BCL2, Wnt-β-catenin signaling, FGFR family, or loss of PTEN and SMARCB1, have provided additional insight into the mechanisms of synovial sarcomagenesis. The recent advancements in the understanding of SyS biology and improvements in preclinical modeling pave the way to the development of new epigenetic drugs and immunotherapeutic approaches conducive to new treatment options.

Patient-derived xenograft models in musculoskeletal malignancies

Successful oncological drug development for bone and soft tissue sarcoma is grossly stagnating. A major obstacle in this process is the lack of appropriate animal models recapitulating the complexity and heterogeneity of musculoskeletal malignancies, resulting in poor efficiency in translating the findings of basic research to clinical applications. In recent years, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models generated by directly engrafting patient-derived tumor fragments into immunocompromised mice have recaptured the attention of many researchers due to their properties of retaining the principle histopathology, biological behaviors, and molecular and genetic characteristics of the original tumor, showing promising future in both basic and clinical studies of bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Despite several limitations including low take rate and long take time in PDX generation, deficient immune system and heterologous tumor microenvironment of the host, PDXs offer a more advantageous platform for preclinical drug screening, biomarker identification and clinical therapeutic decision guiding. Here, we provide a timely review of the establishment and applications of PDX models for musculoskeletal malignancies and discuss current challenges and future directions of this approach.

Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma chemotherapy: an opportunity for personalized medicine

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) includes biologically and histologically diverse mesenchymal tumors that are relatively chemotherapy-resistant compared with other sarcoma subtypes.

METHODS

The authors discuss the clinical challenges frequently encountered by medical oncologists and review the literature for predictive strategies to systematically approach chemotherapy decision making.

RESULTS

There are no clinically validated predictive tests for chemotherapeutic response or resistance in STS. Clinical features including histology, stage, and patient age are currently used to guide therapy decisions in STS.

CONCLUSIONS

A method to predict response or resistance to chemotherapy, utilizing both targeted and conventional agents, would be beneficial in reducing toxicity and improving response rates for patients with STS and also in designing clinical trials for this disease.

Human osteosarcoma xenografts and their sensitivity to chemotherapy

Despite the increased survival rates of osteosarcoma patients attributed to adjuvant chemotherapy, at least one third of the patients still die due to their disease. Further improvements in the management of osteosarcoma may rely on a more individualised treatment strategy, as well as on the introduction of new drugs. To aid in the preclinical evaluation of new candidate substances against osteosarcoma, we have established 11 human osteosarcoma xenograft lines and characterised them with regard to response to five different reference drugs. Doxorubicin, cisplatin methotrexate, ifosfamide and lomustine were effective in 3/11, 3/11, 1/10, 5/11 and 4/11 of the xenografts, respectively. Five xenografts were resistant to all compounds tested. We also assessed the mRNA expression levels of the xenografts for the O(6)-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT), DNA topoisomerase II- (Topo II)-alpha, Gluthathione-S-transferase (GST)-pi, Multidrug-resistance related protein (MRP) 1 and Multidrug-resistance (MDR) 1 genes. There was an inverse correlation between the transcript levels of GST-pi and doxorubicin growth inhibition (r=-0.66; p<0.05), and between the transcript levels of MGMT and the effect of lomustine (r=-0.72; p<0.01), whereas the expression of MRP1 and cisplatin growth inhibition was positively correlated (r=0.82; p<0.005). This panel of xenografts should constitute a good tool for pharmacological and molecular studies in osteosarcoma.

Clinical and cellular pharmacology in relation to solid tumours of childhood

Our understanding of the clinical and cellular pharmacology of drugs commonly used in the treatment of childhood cancer have increased greatly over the past two decades. However, with the exception of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), our current knowledge of factors such as inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability and cellular determinants of chemosensitivity has not been utilized in the design of integrated clinical studies. Recent pre-clinical and clinical evaluation of the topoisomerase I inhibitors topotecan and irinotecan has highlighted the potential importance of pharmacological factors in their effectiveness as cytotoxics. In this review, the clinical and cellular pharmacology of vincristine, actinomycin D, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide will be discussed in relation to the major paediatric solid tumours. For each disease type, knowledge of the clinical and cellular pharmacology of a candidate drug will be related to pharmacodynamic responses such as response, toxicity and prognosis. For diseases such as Wilms' tumour, osteogenic sarcoma and Ewing's tumour, histological response to initial induction chemotherapy is of prognostic significance, and the depth of response is increasingly recognised as an important determinant of prognosis for high-risk neuroblastoma. For several of these tumour types, the dose-intensity of chemotherapy may be an important variable in determining prognosis. However the relationship between pharmacokinetic variability, cellular pharmacology and the major determinants of chemosensitivity to those drugs employed in first line therapy is unknown. The study of these relationships, by means of up front window studies in children who present with high-risk disease, may be as important as the introduction of new agents. Indeed, the optimisation of current therapies may be required to allow a fully informed selection of those children for whom novel therapies are truly needed. Funding and international collaboration at the clinical and scientific level would be required to achieve these aims.