High rate of extra-haematological toxicity compromises dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Anatomical Targeting of Anticancer Drugs to Solid Tumors Using Specific Administration Routes: Review

Despite remarkable recent progress in developing anti-cancer agents, outcomes of patients with solid tumors remain unsatisfactory. In general, anti-cancer drugs are systemically administered through peripheral veins and delivered throughout the body. The major problem with systemic chemotherapy is insufficient uptake of intravenous (IV) drugs by targeted tumor tissue. Although dose escalation and treatment intensification have been attempted in order to increase regional concentrations of anti-tumor drugs, these approaches have produced only marginal benefits in terms of patient outcomes, while often damaging healthy organs. To overcome this problem, local administration of anti-cancer agents can yield markedly higher drug concentrations in tumor tissue with less systemic toxicity. This strategy is most commonly used for liver and brain tumors, as well as pleural or peritoneal malignancies. Although the concept is theoretically reasonable, survival benefits are still limited. This review summarizes clinical results and problems and discusses future directions of regional cancer therapy with local administration of chemotherapeutants.

Loco-regional cancer drug therapy: present approaches and rapidly reversible hydrophobization (RRH) of therapeutic agents as the future direction

Insufficient drug uptake by solid tumors remains the major problem for systemic chemotherapy. Many studies have demonstrated anticancer drug effects to be dose-dependent, although dose-escalation studies have resulted in limited survival benefit with increased systemic toxicities. One solution to this has been the idea of loco-regional drug treatments, which offer dramatically higher drug concentrations in tumor tissues while minimizing systemic toxicity. Although loco-regional delivery has been most prominent in cancers of the liver, soft tissues and serosal peritoneal malignancies, survival benefits are very far from desirable. This review discusses the evolution of loco-regional treatments, the present approaches and offers rapidly reversible hydrophobization of drugs as the new future direction.

At cancer diagnosis: a 'window of opportunity' for behavioural change towards physical activity. A randomised feasibility study in patients with colon and breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Challenges exist in identifying, recruiting and motivating sedentary patients with cancer to initiate physical activity towards recommended levels. We hypothesise that the onset period of adjuvant chemotherapy can be 'the open window of opportunity' to identify and motivate sedentary patients with breast and colon cancers, at risk for developing coronary heart disease, to initiate and sustain lifestyle changes.

AIMS

To investigate the feasibility of oncologists/nurses screening for physical inactivity, in order to identify and recruit an at-risk population of sedentary patients with breast or colon cancer at the onset of adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, the study will examine the adherence to one of two multimodal exercise interventions lasting 12 weeks; (1) hospital-based, high intensity, group exercise intervention (2) home-based, low intensity, individual, pedometer intervention. Both arms will be compared with a control group.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

All newly referred patients will be screened for sedentary behaviour, using national recommendations. Testing at baseline, 6, 12 and 39 weeks will include; (1) physiological testing (VO2-peak, one repetition maximum muscle strength and lung function (2) fasting full body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan (3) fasting blood glucose, insulin, lipids and cholesterols, (4) psychometric questionnaires (general well-being, quality of life, anxiety and depression, motivational readiness). The randomised controlled trial feasibility design is selected in order to examine barriers for recruitment, programme adherence, safety aspects and potential efficacy to the interventions during adjuvant chemotherapy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Scientific Committee of the Capital Region (case No. H-1-2011-131) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (j. No. 2011-41-6349) approved the study. Data will be entered and locked into a database hosted by the Copenhagen Trial Unit, Rigshosptialet. Data will be available for analyses to project members and the trial statistician after the 45 included patients have completed the 12-week test. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN24901641.

Feasibility and safety of dose-dense docetaxel after conventional epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Although dose-dense chemotherapy may reduce breast cancer recurrence and death, phase II studies show that dose-dense docetaxel is poorly tolerated following administration of dose-dense anthracycline-based chemotherapy mainly because of cutaneous toxicity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This pilot study was designed to explore feasibility and safety of dose-dense docetaxel after conventional anthracycline-based therapy. Treatment consisted of sequential administration of 4 cycles of 3-weekly epirubicin (90 mg/m(2)) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m(2)), followed by 4 cycles of bi-weekly docetaxel with pelfilgrastim on day 2 of each docetaxel cycle. Two docetaxel dose levels were planned: 75 mg/m(2) (D75) and 100 mg/m(2) (D100). Patients could only be assigned to the higher docetaxel dose if no early treatment discontinuations due to toxicity were seen, and a median relative dose intensity of docetaxel >90% among the first 5 evaluable patients was achieved.

RESULTS

Fifty three patients received 4 cycles of epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (EC). Six patients withdrew from study before commencing docetaxel: four for toxicity, and two who declined further study participation. Eight patients, 2 in the first dose level and 6 in the second dose level, stopped treatment for toxicity after the first cycle of docetaxel and before densification. Therefore these events were not considered early treatment discontinuations. No patients required dose interruption after the second docetaxel administration. Overall 5 patients in the first dose level and 34 patients in the second dose level received 4 cycles of accelerated (dose-dense) docetaxel. No grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities occurred at the first dose level. No grade 4 toxicities occurred at the second dose level, while grade 3 toxicities occurring in >2 patients were myalgia and bone pain (5 and 8 patients respectively, 13% and 20%) and skin-nail toxicity (7 patients, 21%). No dose-reductions or significant treatment delays were required, translating to median relative dose intensity of 100% for docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), and 99% for 100 mg/m(2).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) bi-weekly after conventional EC is feasible in selected early breast cancer patients. Lack of prior exposure to dose-dense anthracycline, as well as the use of stringent criteria implemented in the treatment protocol, might explain the improved safety profile and high treatment compliance observed in this study.

Dose-dense chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy for early breast cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread acceptance of dose-dense (DD) regimens as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (EBC), studies of efficacy offer contradictory findings. This systematic review evaluates the real impact of DD chemotherapy.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials comparing conventional adjuvant chemotherapy versus a DD regimen for EBC patients were searched in electronic databases. Dose-dense regimens included the same drugs and total amount as conventional chemotherapy, but applied in shorter intervals. Meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects model. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) were expressed with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). The outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicities. Analyses were conducted according to tumor hormone receptor expression, plus tests for interaction.

RESULTS

Four studies (3418 patients) were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that DD therapy can improve DFS (3356 patients; HR=0.83; 95% CI 0.73-0.95; p=0.005), independent of hormone receptor expression status. There was no OS benefit with DD therapy (3356 patients; HR=0.86; 95% CI 0.73-1.01; p=0.06) irrespective of tumor hormone receptor status (OS in hormone-positive stratum HR=0.94; 95% CI 0.74-1.21; OS in hormone-negative stratum HR=0.78; 95% CI 0.62-0.99; interaction test p=0.28). DD regimens caused a small increase in anemia and mucositis, but had no impact on cardiac events, leukemia or myelodysplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

DD adjuvant chemotherapy can improve DFS of EBC patients with little impact on safety. However there is no clear benefit in OS. Further research may indicate if there is any impact on OS not presently seen due to small sample size, and which patients may derive greater benefit.