High-dose melphalan and auto-SCT in patients with monoclonal Ig deposition disease

Assessment of renal outcome following therapy in monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease: Emphasizing the need for a consensus approach

Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD), often associated with plasma cell dyscrasias, predominantly affects the kidneys. In this disease, hematologic response (HR) to treatment can be reliably assessed by International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) consensus criteria, while uniform criteria for assessing renal response are lacking. We report a retrospective analysis of renal outcomes among 34 patients with MIDD. With most patients treated with bortezomib and autologous stem cell transplantation, 26 of 28 (94%) achieved very good partial HR or better. We demonstrate that both IMWG (based on estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) and amyloid (based on proteinuria) criteria are needed to capture renal response: among 28 evaluable patients, 6 (21%) had isolated proteinuria, while 13 (46%) had isolated decreased eGFR. Using both criteria, which were concordant in patients with both decreased eGFR and proteinuria, 22 of 28 patients (79%) achieved a renal response, including 2 of 7 discontinuing dialyses. All 6 patients (100%) with isolated proteinuria and 7 of 13 (54%) with isolated decreased eGFR achieved renal response, suggesting that isolated proteinuria is an early manifestation of MIDD associated with reversible renal damage. Baseline eGFR predicted renal response (p = .02 by quartile) and survival (p = .02), while HR (CR vs. non-CR) did not, probably because of high HR rate. With a median follow-up of 110 months, the median overall survival was 136 months (95% CI: 79-NR) and median renal survival had not been reached. Prospective studies using uniform renal response criteria are needed to optimize the management of MIDD.

Dyspnea and cough in a 68-year-old female with light chain deposition disease

Light chain deposition disease (LCDD) is a rare hematologic disorder characterized by non-amyloid monoclonal immunoglobulin light chain deposition in multiple organs. Pulmonary LCDD (PLCDD) is an uncommon manifestation of LCDD usually seen in middle-aged patients presenting with radiologic cystic and nodular findings. We report the case of a 68-year-old female who presented with shortness of breath and atypical chest pain. Chest computerized tomography (CT) scan revealed numerous diffuse but basilar predominant pulmonary cysts and mild bronchiectasis without nodular disease. Given concomitant abnormal renal function and hepatic laboratory indices, she underwent biopsy of both organs confirming the presence of LCDD. Directed chemotherapy was initiated and stabilized renal and hepatic progression, but on follow-up imaging, pulmonary disease appeared worse. While therapeutic options targeting other organ involvement are available, their directed efficacy for progressive lung disease is not well known.

A New Reality for Multiple Myeloma Renal Failure: US Data Report on Kidney Transplant Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Describe graft and overall survival outcomes in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who underwent kidney transplant (KT) compared to the general KT population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/National United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTON/UNOS) database was analyzed from 1988 to 2019 with R 4.00 and the 2013-2017 United States Renal Data System (USRDS) was surveyed for incidence and mortality of MM ESRD.

RESULTS

USRDS analysis revealed 961 patients diagnosed with ESRD due to MM on average annually, accounting for 0.8% of the ESRD population. Without KT, 44.4% of MM patients died in the first year of renal replacement initiation. OPTON/UNOS analysis identified 218 MM KT patients, compared to 490,089 patients without MM. There was no difference in graft survival between MM KT and the general population (P-value = .13, HR = 1.19 [0.95, 1.49], 95% CI). Median graft survival in MM KT was 2683 days (7.4 years). KT patients with MM had a higher risk for death (P-value = <.0001, HR = 1.83 [1.41, 2.37], 95% CI), and median overall survival was 3076 days (8.4 years). Survival difference was lost when comparing patients ≥50 years (P-value = .42, HR = 1.14 [0.83, 1.56], 95% CI).

CONCLUSION

Patients with MM renal failure who underwent KT had equivalent graft and age-matched overall survival compared to the general KT population. Therefore select patients with MM renal failure have potential for excellent KT outcomes, should be considered for transplantation when feasible, and should not be excluded from KT based on a history of MM.

Long-term Outcomes of Sequential Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Kidney Transplantation: Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

Experience with sequential hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and kidney transplant (KT) is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study of adult patients who underwent both HSCT and KT at our center, with a median follow-up of 11 y.

RESULTS

In our 54 patients cohort (94% autologous HSCT), 36 (67%) patients received HSCT first followed by KT, while 18 (33%) received KT before HSCT. In both groups, AL amyloidosis represented 50% of hematologic diagnosis. Only 4 patients expired due to hematologic disease relapse (2 patients in each group) and only 3 allografts were lost due to hematologic disease recurrence (HSCT first n = 1 and KT first n = 2). Overall 1, 5, and 10 y death-censored graft survival rates were 94%, 94%, and 94%, respectively, for the HSCT first group and 89%, 89%, and 75%, respectively, for the KT first group. Overall 1, 5, and 10 y patients survival rates were 100%, 97% and 90%, respectively, for the HSCT first group and 100%, 76%, and 63%, respectively, for the KT first group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports safety of sequential KT and HSCT, with improved overall patient survival compared to recipients of HSCT remaining on dialysis and good long-term kidney allograft outcome.

Heavy Lifting: Nomenclature and Novel Therapy for Gamma Heavy Chain Disease and Other Heavy Chain Disorders

Heavy chain disorders are rare B-cell disorders and include heavy chain disease, heavy chain deposition disease, and heavy chain amyloidosis. These disorders share the pathognomonic finding of a truncated immunoglobulin heavy chain without an associated light chain in the serum or urine in the case of heavy chain disease or in the tissues in the case of heavy chain deposition disease and heavy chain amyloidosis but are clinically distinct entities. The clinical recognition and systematic approaches to these disorders are challenging because of the rarity of the diseases, lack of consensus on treatment approaches, and minimal data with novel therapy. Herein we present a review of the literature and 5 consecutive cases at a single institution of gamma heavy chain disease and heavy chain deposition disease treated with novel agents including regimens of CRd (cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone), CyBorD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone), R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone), BR (bendamustine and rituximab), V-EPOCH (bortezomib, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin), and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The clinical implication of monoclonal gammopathies: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and of renal significance

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) has introduced a new perspective to several well-known disease entities impacting nephrology, haematology and pathology. Given the constantly changing disease spectrum of these entities, it is clinically imperative to establish diagnostic and treatment pathways supported by evidence-based medicine. MGRS is a disease of the kidney, secondary to plasma cell clonal proliferation or immune dysfunction, requiring therapeutic intervention to eradicate the offending clone. To fully understand the disease(s), it is prerequisite to determine the significance of the findings. The diagnostic work up should be extensive due to the wide heterogeneity of clinical presentation, ultimately necessitating kidney biopsy. Particular patient profiles such as AL amyloidosis, which may be diagnosed through biopsies of other tissues/organs, may be an exception. Treatment decisions should be formulated by multi-disciplinary consensus: nephrologists, haematologists and pathologists. The ultimate goal in managing MGRS is eradication of the offending plasma cell clone which requires targeted chemotherapy and, in eligible cases, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We present a review of diagnostic procedures, treatment options and advances in the last few years in the management of MGRS in an effort to acquaint specialists with this new face of several older diseases.

The evaluation of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: a consensus report of the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group

The term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) was introduced by the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group (IKMG) in 2012. The IKMG met in April 2017 to refine the definition of MGRS and to update the diagnostic criteria for MGRS-related diseases. Accordingly, in this Expert Consensus Document, the IKMG redefines MGRS as a clonal proliferative disorder that produces a nephrotoxic monoclonal immunoglobulin and does not meet previously defined haematological criteria for treatment of a specific malignancy. The diagnosis of MGRS-related disease is established by kidney biopsy and immunofluorescence studies to identify the monotypic immunoglobulin deposits (although these deposits are minimal in patients with either C3 glomerulopathy or thrombotic microangiopathy). Accordingly, the IKMG recommends a kidney biopsy in patients suspected of having MGRS to maximize the chance of correct diagnosis. Serum and urine protein electrophoresis and immunofixation, as well as analyses of serum free light chains, should also be performed to identify the monoclonal immunoglobulin, which helps to establish the diagnosis of MGRS and might also be useful for assessing responses to treatment. Finally, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy should be conducted to identify the lymphoproliferative clone. Flow cytometry can be helpful in identifying small clones. Additional genetic tests and fluorescent in situ hybridization studies are helpful for clonal identification and for generating treatment recommendations. Treatment of MGRS was not addressed at the 2017 IKMG meeting; consequently, this Expert Consensus Document does not include any recommendations for the treatment of patients with MGRS.

This Expert Consensus Document from the International Kidney and Monoclonal Gammopathy Research Group includes an updated definition of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) and recommendations for the use of kidney biopsy and other modalities for evaluating suspected MGRS

Assessment of kidney transplant suitability for patients with prior cancers: is it time for a rethink?

Kidney transplant recipients have up to a 100-fold greater risk of incident cancer compared with the age/sex-matched general population, attributed largely to chronic immunosuppression. In patients with a prior history of treated cancers, the type, stage and the potential for cancer recurrence post-transplant of prior cancers are important factors when determining transplant suitability. Consequently, one of the predicaments facing transplant clinicians is to determine whether patients with prior cancers are eligible for transplantation, balancing between the accelerated risk of death on dialysis, the projected survival benefit and quality of life gains with transplantation, and the premature mortality associated with the potential risk of cancer recurrence post-transplant. The guidelines informing transplant eligibility or screening and preventive strategies against cancer recurrence for patients with prior cancers are inconsistent, underpinned by uncertain evidence on the estimates of the incidence of cancer recurrence and the lack of stage-specific outcomes data, particularly among those with multiple myeloma or immune-driven malignancies such as melanomas. With the advent of newer anti-cancer treatment options, it is unclear whether the current guidelines for those with prior cancers remain appropriate. This review will summarize the uncertainties of evidence informing the current recommendations regarding transplant eligibility of patients with prior cancers.

Outcomes of renal transplantation in patients with previous hematologic malignancies

Recommendations regarding the appropriateness of renal transplantation in patients with prior hematologic malignancies are limited. Given the lack of available data, studies are needed to assess which of these patients will maximally benefit from renal transplantation. This study was undertaken to describe the incidence of new or recurrent malignancy as well as patient and allograft survival, acute rejection, and serious infections in patients with prior hematologic malignancies receiving renal transplantation. This was a single center retrospective review of all adult patients with a previous hematologic malignancy who received a living or deceased renal transplantation between January 2009 and January 2016. Eight renal transplantation recipients with prior hematologic malignancies were identified and followed for a minimum of 3 years. Six patients received prior chemotherapy and five had a prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Median time from remission to transplant was 2.6 years. Three-year patient and allograft survival were 87% and 75%, respectively. Three patients were diagnosed with new cancers within 3 years post-renal transplantation; one of which died from cancer-related complications with a functioning allograft. There was concern for recurrent hematologic malignancies in two patients based on serologic studies, but, both of these patients were alive with functioning allografts at 3-year follow-up. Our experience suggests that renal transplantation can be successfully performed in select patients with prior hematologic malignancy but with a significant risk for de novo malignancy post-transplant, which may be associated with an overall poor prognosis. Decisions regarding renal transplantation candidacy should be made based on risk stratification and multidisciplinary discussions with patients, hematologists, and transplant providers.

Risk of relapse of multiple myeloma following kidney transplantation

Background

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and novel therapies have improved the prognosis for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). For those who undergo ASCT while on dialysis, a similar survival compared with the overall MM population has been reported. Therefore, for patients achieving remission following ASCT, kidney transplantation is an attractive option, offering an improved quality of life and significant economic advantage.

Method

This case series investigates the outcome of five patients who underwent an ASCT for MM with subsequent kidney transplantation between 2006 and 2012.

Results

Four patients presented with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and one progressed to ESRD shortly after diagnosis. Induction chemotherapy regimens with novel agents including thalidomide and bortezomib were utilized. Following attainment of very good partial remission or complete remission, high-dose melphalan ASCTs were performed after a median of 10 months. Kidney transplantation (living donor n = 3, deceased donor n = 2) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression regimens was completed at a median of 27 months after ASCT. Patients 1 and 3 experienced relapse of myeloma at 6 and 16 months after kidney transplantation. Patients 2, 4 and 5 remain alive at 55 months (median) after kidney transplantation with no evidence of relapse.

Conclusion

Forty percent of our cohort experienced a relapse in MM within 2 years of kidney transplantation. Death-censored graft survival and patient survival were 80% at 4 years. Our study adds to the growing literature supporting kidney transplantation following successful ASCT for MM and is useful when counselling patients regarding renal and haematological outcomes.

Multiple myeloma and kidney transplantation: the beginning of a new era

The introduction of several novel therapeutic agents has improved the outcome in multiple myeloma (MM) patients including those with chronic kidney disease, and it is predicted that MM will become a curable disease in a substantial subset of MM patients. While in the past-because of inferior posttransplant outcomes-renal transplantation was not offered to MM patients, recent data suggest that renal transplantation is a viable treatment option in patients treated with modern anti-myeloma induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation achieving durable complete responses. The article of Shah, Ibrahim, Delaney et al. [Risk of relapse of multiple myeloma following kidney transplantation: a case series report. Clin Kidney J 2018 (in this issue)] in the current issue of Clinical Kidney Journal adds to this evidence and highlights the limitations and outstanding questions concerning renal transplantation in MM patients.

[Oligosecretory monoclonal gammopathy with renal involvement]

The article deals with the so-called monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), which is being actively explored in the world and has been recently investigated in Russia. It indicates the principles of identifying the phenotypes of MGUS and criteria for assessing the risk of its progression to cancer. There is an update on the possible involvement of monoclonal proteins in the pathogenesis of certain non-neoplastic kidney diseases, renal injuries in particular. The paper gives their classification and enumerates differential diagnostic techniques, including the Freelite method, a highly sensitive one to determine free light chains (FLC), prognostic criteria, and approaches to treating each separate form in relation to the phenotype of a monoclonal protein. The authors present their own data on detection rates for MGUS at a multidisciplinary hospital and a clinical case of MGUS-associated membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, by justifying a treatment regimen containing bortezomib (velcade).

Paraprotein-Related Kidney Disease: Diagnosing and Treating Monoclonal Gammopathy of Renal Significance

Paraprotein-related kidney disease represents a complex group of diseases caused by an abnormal paraprotein secreted by a clone of B cells. The disease manifestations range from tubulopathies, such as the Fanconi syndrome, to a spectrum of glomerular diseases that can present with varying degrees of proteinuria and renal dysfunction. Diagnosis of these diseases can be challenging because of the wide range of manifestations as well as the relatively common finding of a serum paraprotein, especially in elderly patients. Thus, renal biopsy along with detailed hematologic workup is essential to link the presence of the paraprotein to the associated renal disease. Recent advances in treatment with more effective and targeted chemotherapies, as well as stem cell transplantation, have improved the renal and overall prognosis for many of these disorders.

Hematopoietic Cell and Renal Transplantation in Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Patients

Gammopathies, multiple myeloma, and amyloidosis are plasma dyscrasias characterized by clonal proliferation and immunoglobulin overproduction. Renal impairment is the most common and serious complication with an incidence of 20–30% patients at the diagnosis. Kidney transplant has not been considered feasible in the presence of plasma dyscrasias because the immunosuppressive therapy may increase the risk of neoplasia progression, and paraproteins may affect the graft. However, recent advances in clinical management of multiple myeloma and other gammopathies allow considering kidney transplant as a possible alternative to dialysis. Numerous evidence indicates the direct relationship between hematological remission and renal function restoring. The combination of kidney and hematopoietic cell transplant has been reported as a promising approach to reestablish end-organ function and effectively treat the underlying disease. This review describes current protocols used to perform kidney transplantation in patients with plasma dyscrasias.

Monoclonal gammopathy: The good, the bad and the ugly

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a condition characterized by the presence of a monoclonal gammopathy (MG) in which the clonal mass has not reached a predefined state in which the condition is considered malignant. It is a precursor to conditions such as multiple myeloma or lymphoma at a rate of ~1%/year. Thus, from a hematologic standpoint, MGUS is a fairly benign condition. However, it is now recognized that organ damage resulting from just the MG without the need MM or lymphoma can occur. One of the most recognized is nephropathy secondary to monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS). Other well-recognized conditions include neuropathies, oculopathies and dermopathies. Some conditions such as autoimmune diseases and coagulopathies are less common and recognized. Finally, systemic involvement of multiple organs is well described in several entities. In all of these conditions, the role of the MG is no longer insignificant. Thus, the term MGUS should be avoided when describing these entities.

New aspects on the pathogenesis of renal disorders related to monoclonal gammopathies

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma and other related monoclonal gammopathies are frequently encountered conditions associated with renal damage, especially in elderly population. They are arising from clonal proliferation of plasma cells in bone marrow producing various quantities of abnormal monoclonal immunoglobulins, or their components/fragments.

SUMMARY

These abnormal proteins differ from normal immunoglobulins in the amino acid sequence and in the three-dimensional structure of the molecule, which may determine their toxicity. Kidney seems to be a target organ as a major catabolic site. The pathology of renal disease is highly heterogeneous involving a variety of different mechanisms, which are divided into immunoglobulin dependent and immunoglobulin independent mechanisms. The Ig-dependent mechanisms may involve the four components of the kidney parenchyma, and the primary structure of these proteins determine the pattern of renal disease.

KEY MESSAGE

This review summarizes the existing literature in the pathobiology of multiple myeloma, and the pathological properties of the M-proteins, focusing on the mechanisms of the renal manifestations related to these abnormal proteins, especially glomerular injury. Also it supports the opinion that monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) should not be used in cases where there is proven renal impairment due to these proteins, even if it is mild and does not meet the current criteria.

Myeloma-related kidney disease

Multiple myeloma is a malignant plasma cell disorder characterized by the overproduction of monoclonal proteins. The kidney is 1 of the major target organs of multiple myeloma. Most often, this is the result of the monoclonal proteins, which can injure the kidney via several mechanisms. In some cases, direct invasion by myeloma cells and/or bone marrow cells can also result in kidney injury. A kidney biopsy can help distinguish the various myeloma-related kidney diseases and aid in the treatment plan.

How I treat monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS)

Recently, the term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) was introduced to distinguish monoclonal gammopathies that result in the development of kidney disease from those that are benign. By definition, patients with MGRS have B-cell clones that do not meet the definition of multiple myeloma or lymphoma. Nevertheless, these clones produce monoclonal proteins that are capable of injuring the kidney resulting in permanent damage. Except for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis with heart involvement in which death can be rapid, treatment of MGRS is often indicated more to preserve kidney function and prevent recurrence after kidney transplantation rather than the prolongation of life. Clinical trials are rare for MGRS-related kidney diseases, except in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis. Treatment recommendations are therefore based on the clinical data obtained from treatment of the clonal disorder in its malignant state. The establishment of these treatment recommendations is important until data can be obtained by clinical trials of MGRS-related kidney diseases.

Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: when MGUS is no longer undetermined or insignificant

Multiple myeloma is the most frequent monoclonal gammopathy to involve the kidney; however, a growing number of kidney diseases associated with other monoclonal gammopathies are being recognized. Although many histopathologic patterns exist, they are all distinguished by the monoclonal immunoglobulin (or component) deposits. The hematologic disorder in these patients is more consistent with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) than with multiple myeloma. Unfortunately, due to the limitations of the current diagnostic schema, they are frequently diagnosed as MGUS. Because treatment is not recommended for MGUS, appropriate therapy is commonly withheld. In addition to end-stage renal disease, the persistence of the monoclonal gammopathy is associated with high rates of recurrence after kidney transplantation. Preservation and restoration of kidney function are possible with successful treatment targeting the responsible clone. Achievement of hematologic complete response has been shown to prevent recurrence after kidney transplantation. There is a need for a term that properly conveys the pathologic nature of these diseases. We think the term monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance is most helpful to indicate a causal relationship between the monoclonal gammopathy and the renal damage and because the significance of the monoclonal gammopathy is no longer undetermined.

Renal monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease: a report of 64 patients from a single institution

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To better define the clinical-pathologic spectrum and prognosis of monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD), this study reports the largest series.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Characteristics of 64 MIDD patients who were seen at Mayo Clinic are provided.

RESULTS

Of 64 patients with MIDD, 51 had light chain deposition disease, 7 had heavy chain deposition disease, and 6 had light and heavy chain deposition disease. The mean age at diagnosis was 56 years, and 23 patients (36%) were ≤50 years of age. Clinical evidence of dysproteinemia was present in 62 patients (97%), including multiple myeloma in 38 (59%). M-spike was detected on serum protein electrophoresis in 47 (73%). Serum free light chain ratio was abnormal in all 51 patients tested. Presentation included renal insufficiency, proteinuria, hematuria, and hypertension. Nodular mesangial sclerosis was seen in 39 patients (61%). During a median of 25 months of follow-up (range, 1-140) in 56 patients, 32 (57%) had stable/improved renal function, 2 (4%) had worsening renal function, and 22 (39%) progressed to ESRD. The mean renal and patient survivals were 64 and 90 months, respectively. The disease recurred in three of four patients who received a kidney transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MIDD generally present at a younger age than those with light chain amyloidosis or light chain cast nephropathy. Serum free light chain ratio is abnormal in all MIDD patients, whereas only three-quarters have abnormal serum protein electrophoresis. The prognosis for MIDD is improving compared with historical controls, likely reflecting earlier detection and improved therapies.

Peripheral Neuropathy and VIth Nerve Palsy Related to Randall Disease Successfully Treated by High-Dose Melphalan, Autologous Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, and VIth Nerve Decompression Surgery

Randall disease is an unusual cause of extraocular motor nerve (VI) palsy. A 35-year-old woman was hospitalized for sicca syndrome. The physical examination showed general weakness, weight loss, diplopia related to a left VIth nerve palsy, hypertrophy of the submandibular salivary glands, and peripheral neuropathy. The biological screening revealed renal insufficiency, serum monoclonal kappa light chain immunoglobulin, urinary monoclonal kappa light chain immunoglobulin, albuminuria, and Bence-Jones proteinuria. Bone marrow biopsy revealed medullar plasma cell infiltration. Immunofixation associated with electron microscopy analysis of the salivary glands showed deposits of kappa light chains. Randall disease was diagnosed. The patient received high-dose melphalan followed by autostem cell transplantation which led to rapid remission. Indeed, at the 2-month followup assessment, the submandibular salivary gland hypertrophy and renal insufficiency had disappeared, and the peripheral neuropathy, proteinuria, and serum monoclonal light chain had decreased significantly. The persistent diplopia was treated with nerve decompression surgery of the left extraocular motor nerve. Cranial nerve complications of Randall disease deserve to be recognized.