Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donation-standardized assessment of donor outcome data: a consensus statement from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT)

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an Italian monocentric experience on the health assessment and eligibility of adult-related donors

Introduction

Indications for HSCT are increasing worldwide, paralleled by a growing demand for donors of therapeutic cells.

Methods

Herein, we report our real-world experience of adult HPC donor assessment during a 5-year study period (2018-2023): we have retrospectively revised data of 455 potential related stem cell donors, consecutively evaluated at our center. Donor medical history was assessed by a questionnaire and an interview with a trained physician experienced in donation procedures to evaluate donor fitness and medical history. Pre-existing health disorders were fully investigated. Behavioral risk factors for communicable infectious diseases were also routinely explored.

Results and discussion

Overall, 351 donors were finally assessed as eligible for HPC donation, and 233 underwent stem cell collection, 158 through apheresis from mobilized peripheral blood, and 75 through bone marrow harvest. Among them, 27 donors were selected despite the presence of pre-existing health conditions, which would be potential exclusion criteria for unrelated donors: 16 suffered from well-controlled cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and 11 from allergic diathesis. Most of the selected donors with pre-existing disorders were candidates for apheresis HPC collection (21, 77.8%), while only six (22.2%) underwent BM harvest. We then analyzed the data relative to the corresponding 233 allogeneic HSCT to explore if the presence of pre-existing diseases in the donors could show any association with transplant characteristics. Transplants from CVD and allergy donors showed no significant disparities in comparison with those from healthy donors. A significant difference emerged regarding the disease severity, with a higher proportion of patients with high/very high disease risk index (DRI) among those receiving grafts from CVD donors (68.7% in transplants from CVD donors versus 36.0% in transplants from healthy donors, p=0.005). Multivariate analysis confirmed that high/very high DRI patients had an increased probability of receiving donations from CVD donors (OR, 4.89; 95%CI, 1.15-20.86; p=0.031). Among donors with well-controlled pre-existing conditions, no adverse events were recorded during stem cell collection or at follow-up. Our results suggest that in patients at high risk for relapse requiring a prompt allogeneic transplant, a familiar donor might be accepted for HPC apheresis donation on less strict criteria than unrelated donors, without risk for both donor and patient.

Protection of haematopoietic progenitor cell donors: an updated overview of the European landscape

Haematopoietic progenitor cell donation from bone marrow and mobilised peripheral blood obtained from related and unrelated donors is an established procedure. The donation process in general has proven to be safe, but in rare cases severe and even fatal events have been reported. The present study aimed at providing a description of the current situation of donor protection measures in Council of Europe member States. A specific questionnaire was developed to compile information on donation activities, graft sources, legal frameworks, donor protection measures, collection of donor outcome data, and long-term follow-up of paediatric and adult related and unrelated donors. The outcome of this survey served as a basis for elaborating the Recommendation CM/Rec(2020)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on establishing harmonised measures for the protection of haematopoietic progenitor cell donors.

Severe short-term adverse events in related bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cell donors

The incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs) and associated risk factors in hematopoietic cell transplantation donors needs to be clarified for related donors (relatives of the transplant recipient), whose criteria for donation are more lenient than for unrelated donors. Data from related donors registered in the Japanese national data registry database between 2005 and 2021 were evaluated to determine the association of short-term SAE incidence with donor characteristics at registration.Fourteen of 4339 bone marrow (BM) donors (0.32%) and 54 of 10,684 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors (0.51%) experienced confirmed SAEs during the short donation period. No deaths were observed. Past medical history was a common risk factor for SAEs in both BM and PBSC donors. Age of 60 years or older and female sex were identified as risk factors for SAEs in PBSC donors. Female sex was also a risk factor for poor mobilization, which resulted in discontinuation of PBSC collection.Although donors should be selected carefully, a certain level of safety is ensured for related donors in Japan. Donor safety should be further increased by improving the selection method for related donors and extending the follow-up period.

Suitability of haematopoietic cell donors: updated consensus recommendations from the WBMT standing committee on donor issues

The contribution of related donors to the globally rising number of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) remains increasingly important, particularly because of the growing use of haploidentical HSCT. Compared with the strict recommendations on the suitability for unrelated donors, criteria for related donors allow for more discretion and vary between centres. In 2015, the donor outcome committee of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) proposed consensus recommendations of suitability criteria for paediatric and adult related donors. This Review provides updates and additions to these recommendations from a panel of experts with global representation, including the WBMT, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation donor outcome committee, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research donor health and safety committee, the US National Marrow Donor Program, and the World Marrow Donor Association, after review of the current literature and guidelines. Sections on the suitability of related donors who would not qualify as unrelated donors have been updated. Sections on communicable diseases, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, paediatric aspects including psychological issues, and reporting on serious adverse events have been added. The intention of this Review is to support decision making, with the goal of minimising the medical risk to the donor and protecting the recipient from transmissible diseases.

Basic characteristics and safety of donation in related and unrelated haematopoietic progenitor cell donors - first 10 years of prospective donor follow-up of Swiss donors

Since July 2007 prospective life-long follow-up (FU) for unrelated (URD) and related donors (RD) is mandatory in Switzerland and data on every allogeneic haematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) donation are collected prospectively. We report the real-world experience of HPC donation during a 10-year study period (01.07.2007-30.06.2017) with basic characteristics and FU data. 1105 donors underwent 1155 HPC donation procedures. Eighty percent of first donations performed by 802 (73%) RDs and 303 (27%) URDs were peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC), 20% bone marrow (BM). Male donors were over-represented as URD (60% male vs 40% female). Main differences between RDs and URDs concerned age and pre-existing health disorders. RDs were significantly older at first donation (median age 48 years) compared to URD (34 years, p < 0.0001) and had more pre-existing health problems: 25% vs 9% in URD (p < 0.0001). No fatal complications occurred, collection related severe adverse events (SAE) after first donation were not significantly different between groups (RD 1.2%, URD 0.99%), incidence rates for neoplastic and autoimmune diseases did not exceed the rates of the general population. RDs are a more heterogeneous and potentially more vulnerable group, but if donor evaluation is performed appropriately, HPC donation is still safe.

How donor selection criteria can be evaluated with limited scientific evidence: lessons learned from the TRANSPOSE project

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Donor selection criteria (DSC) are a vital link in the chain of supply of Substances of Human Origin (SoHO) but are also subject to controversy and differences of opinion. Traditionally, DSC have been based on application of the precautionary principle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2017 to 2020, TRANSPOSE (TRANSfusion and transplantation PrOtection and SElection of donors), a European research project, aimed to identify discrepancies between current DSC by proposing a standardized risk assessment method for all SoHO (solid organs excluded) and all levels of evidence.

RESULTS

The current DSC were assessed using a modified risk assessment method based on the Alliance of Blood Operators' Risk-based decision-making framework for blood safety. It was found that with limited or diverging scientific evidence, it was difficult to reach consensus and an international standardized method for decision-making was lacking. Furthermore, participants found it hard to disregard their local guidelines when providing expert opinion, which resulted in substantial influence on the consensus-based decision-making process.

CONCLUSIONS

While the field of donation-safety research is expanding rapidly, there is an urgent need to formalize the decision-making process regarding DSC. This includes the need for standardized methods to increase transparency in the international decision-making process and to ensure that this is performed consistently. Our framework provides an easy-to-implement approach for standardizing risk assessments, especially in the context of limited scientific evidence.

Putting the spotlight on donation-related risks and donor safety - are we succeeding in protecting donors?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European consortium project TRANSPOSE (TRANSfusion and transplantation: PrOtection and SElection of donors) aimed to assess and evaluate the risks to donors of Substances of Human Origin (SoHO), and to identify gaps between current donor vigilance systems and perceived risks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

National and local data from participating organizations on serious and non-serious adverse reactions in donors were collected from 2014 to 2017. Following this, a survey was performed among participants to identify risks not included in the data sets. Finally, participants rated the risks according to severity, level of evidence and prevalence.

RESULTS

Significant discrepancies between anticipated donor risks and the collected data were found. Furthermore, many participants reported that national data on adverse reactions in donors of stem cells, gametes, embryos and tissues were not routinely collected and/or available.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that there is a need to further develop and standardize donor vigilance in Europe and to include long-term risks to donors, which are currently underreported, ensuring donor health and securing the future supply of SoHO.

Donor Evaluation for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Collection

With the increasing incidence of hematopoietic allogeneic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the importance of securing a cellular product, safely from a donor, and ensuring that the product is without additional risk to the recipient, continues to be of paramount importance. The evaluation of the donor’s medical eligibility and suitability is designed to identify and limit the risk of transmitting infectious, genetic, or neoplastic diseases to the recipient through the product. It also aims to ensure a maximum level of safety for the donor and informs them of the risks of donation. Several regulatory agencies, national and international registries, and accreditation bodies have facilitated the availability and safe provision of human cells, tissues, and cellular- and tissue-based products not only at local institutions but also through international exchange.

Influence of the degree of donor bone marrow hyperplasia on patient clinical outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

This study evaluated the influence of the degree of donor bone marrow (BM) hyperplasia on patient clinical outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Twelve patients received allo-HSCT from hypoplastic BM donors between January 2010 and December 2017. Forty-eight patients whose donors demonstrated BM hyperplasia were selected using a propensity score matching method (1:4). Primary graft failure including poor graft function and graft rejection did not occur in two groups. In BM hypoplasia and hyperplasia groups, the cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 (91.7% vs. 93.8%, P=0.75), platelet engraftment at day 150 (83.3% vs. 93.8%, P=0.48), the median time to myeloid engraftment (14 days vs. 14 days, P=0.85) and platelet engraftment (14 days vs. 14 days, P=0.85) were comparable. The 3-year progression-free survival, overall survival, CI of non-relapse mortality and relapse were 67.8% vs. 71.7% (P=0.98), 69.8% vs. 77.8% (P=0.69), 18.5% vs. 13.6% (P=0.66), and 10.2% vs. 10.4% (P=0.82), respectively. In multivariate analysis, donor BM hypoplasia did not affect patient clinical outcomes after allo-HSCT. If patients have no other suitable donor, a donor with BM hypoplasia can be used for patients receiving allo-HSCT if the donor Complete Blood Count and other examinations are normal.

Hematopoietic cell transplant nurse coordinators' perceptions of related donor care: a European survey from the EBMT Nurses Group

Allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative procedure for patients with haematological malignancies and immune deficiencies. A human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identical sibling is only available for 25-35% of patients in need. The improvement in haplo-identical transplantation has led to a marked increase in cell donation from relatives. Despite international recommendations, discrepancies in related-donors (RD) care exist between centres, particularly regarding medical suitability criteria, consenting procedures and donor follow-up. This European survey aimed to explore hematopoietic cell transplantation coordinators nurses' (HCT-CNs) perceptions of RD care, in particular the association with the presence or not of an independent unit (IU). Ninety-three HCT-CNs from seventy-six EBMT centres responded, representing 19 countries (response rate: 27%). Our results did not show a significant association between IU and HCT-CNs perceptions of related-donors care. The practices for RD care vary among centres regarding presence or not of an IU (48%), person caring for RD (haematologist in 54%, HCT physician in 17%, HCT-CNs in 20%), person to whom the results of HLA typing are communicated, use of a booklet for RD, follow-up or not and periodicity of follow-up. Qualitative data highlight the related-donation ethical issues and the need for improvement in RD care. HCT-CNs' main concerns were: the necessary confidentiality to insure the voluntary status of RD, the perceived conflict of interest felt by professionals when managing both patients and RD, plus the psychosocial aspects of related-donation. Even if there is a variety of a practice among centres, the presence of an IU is not significantly associated with an improvement in RD care.

Effect of Educational Program on Knowledge, Attitude, and Willingness of Nursing Students for Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Donation

This study explored how an educational program on hematopoietic stem-cell donation (HSCD) affects the knowledge, attitude, and willingness for HSCD among nursing students. The subjects were the nursing students at a university in Korea: 43 in the experimental group and 42 in the control group. All subjects took a pre-test, and only the experimental group attended an educational program. Both the groups completed two post-tests. Variables of interest were knowledge, attitude, willingness, and registration ratio for HSCD. The educational program increased knowledge (F = 8.093, p < 0.001) and attitude (F = −6.422, p < 0.001) of the experiment group. After the program, the experimental group showed higher willingness for HSCD (χ² = 7.609, p = 0.006) and higher registration ratio for HSCD (χ²= 4.258, p = 0.039) compared to the control group. The educational programs for knowledge and attitude about HSCD will affect the students’ future nursing, and influence clients and their families toward positive perception on HSCD and organ donations.

[Related donors follow-up: Guidelines from the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Since 2010 there has been an exponential increase of the number of transplants performed from related donors. The development of haploidentical transplants increases the resort to related-donation, which presents two main advantages: a less important financial cost and a faster availability of the graft. Standards for mandatory accreditation exist, but the adherence to these recommendations is not optimal: currently, different practices regarding the organizational modalities of care, recruitment criteria, qualification and follow-up of related donors have been observed among French transplant centers. The Francophone Society of Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) has developed guidelines for the consent and the non-eligibility criteria for hematopoietic stem cell donors. A multidisciplinary group has devised a booklet as a medium to inform donors about hematopoietic cell donation and transplantation in a clear and accessible language. This paper provides recommendations on post-donation follow-up, taking into account both medical standards and organizational constraints of French centers. Some tools are proposed.

How to build an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant unit in 2016: Proposal for a practical framework

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is part of the standard of care for many hematological diseases. Over the last decades, significant advances in patient and donor selection, conditioning regimens as well as supportive care of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation leading to improved overall survival have been made. In view of many new treatment options in cellular and molecular targeted therapies, the place of allogeneic transplantation in therapy concepts must be reviewed. Most aspects of hematopoietic cell transplantation are well standardized by national guidelines or laws as well as by certification labels such as FACT-JACIE. However, the requirements for the construction and layout of a unit treating patients during the acute phase of the transplantation procedure or at readmission for different complications are not well defined. In addition, the infrastructure of such a unit may be decisive for optimized care of these fragile patients. Here we describe the process of planning a transplant unit in order to open a discussion that could lead to more precise guidelines in the field of infrastructural requirements for hospitals caring for people with severe immunosuppression.

Short-term side effects and attitudes towards second donation: A comparison of related and unrelated haematopoietic stem cell donors

The Nordic Register of Haematopoietic Stem Cell Donors (NRHSD) has registered related and unrelated donors from 10 transplant centres in Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark since 1998. We present a prospective, observational study of 1,957 donors, focusing mainly on the differences between related and unrelated donors. Related donors are reported to have more comorbidities, but similar side effects compared with unrelated donors. Side effects after BM or PBSC donation are generally of short duration and in this study no deaths, myocardial infarctions, splenic ruptures, or thromboembolic events are reported. Interestingly, related donors express more hesitancy towards donating again when asked 1 month after donation.

Donor Selection for Allogenic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical and Ethical Considerations

Allogenic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an established treatment for many diseases. Stem cells may be obtained from different sources: mobilized peripheral blood stem cells, bone marrow, and umbilical cord blood. The progress in transplantation procedures, the establishment of experienced transplant centres, and the creation of unrelated adult donor registries and cord blood banks gave those without an human leucocyte antigen- (HLA-) identical sibling donor the opportunity to find a donor and cord blood units worldwide. HSCT imposes operative cautions so that the entire donation/transplantation procedure is safe for both donors and recipients; it carries with it significant clinical, moral, and ethical concerns, mostly when donors are minors. The following points have been stressed: the donation should be excluded when excessive risks for the donor are reasonable, donors must receive an accurate information regarding eventual adverse events and health burden for the donors themselves, a valid consent is required, and the recipient's risks must be outweighed by the expected benefits. The issue of conflict of interest, when the same physician has the responsibility for both donor selection and recipient care, is highlighted as well as the need of an adequate insurance protection for all the parties involved.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity worldwide in 2012 and a SWOT analysis of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group including the global survey

Data on 68 146 hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) (53% autologous and 47% allogeneic) gathered by 1566 teams from 77 countries and reported through their regional transplant organizations were analyzed by main indication, donor type and stem cell source for the year 2012. With transplant rates ranging from 0.1 to 1001 per 10 million inhabitants, more HSCTs were registered from unrelated 16 433 donors than related 15 493 donors. Grafts were collected from peripheral blood (66%), bone marrow (24%; mainly non-malignant disorders) and cord blood (10%). Compared with 2006, an increase of 46% total (57% allogeneic and 38% autologous) was observed. Growth was due to an increase in reporting teams (18%) and median transplant activity/team (from 38 to 48 HSCTs/team). An increase of 167% was noted in mismatched/haploidentical family HSCT. A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis revealed the global perspective of WBMT to be its major strength and identified potential to be the key professional body for patients and authorities. The limited data collection remains its major weakness and threat. In conclusion, global HSCT grows over the years without plateauing (allogeneic>autologous) and at different rates in the four World Health Organization regions. Major increases were observed in allogeneic, haploidentical HSCT and, to a lesser extent, in cord blood transplantation.

Donors' health state the year after peripheral haematopoietic progenitor cell collection: A prospective follow-up study in related and unrelated donors compared to first-time platelet donors

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral haematopoietic progenitor cells collected by apheresis (HPC-A) are the most common source used for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Retrospective short and long-term donor follow-up studies show very low risks of serious complications and do not report compelling evidence of increased cancer occurrence. Some studies reported a prolonged period of leucopenia without an obvious association with infectious complications. However, beyond the first few weeks after the procedure a relationship between events is elusive. We therefore evaluated medical service utilization by prospectively recruited HPC-A donors and first-time platelet apheresis donors for comparison for 1 year after donation. Data were prospectively collected using questionnaires and by medical record review. A total of 215 HPC-A donors (111 unrelated donors and 104 related donors) and 96 first-time platelet donors consented to participation in the study. Follow-up was available for 202 (96%): questionnaires were returned by 74% and records from nonstudy contacts were available for 94% of donors. During the 1-year follow-up, 94 of the donors who returned questionnaires sought medical attention for diagnostic evaluation and/or treatment: 41% of HPC-A donors and 40% of platelet donors. Medical service utilization the first year after HPC-A donation is similar to that after first-time platelet donation. The occurrence of serious medical conditions in both related and unrelated HPC-A donors underscores the importance of participation in long-term follow-up in large cohorts. The findings in this relatively small cohort contribute to evidence on the safety of G-CSF mobilization and HPC-A. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:523-528, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Significant Improvements in the Practice Patterns of Adult Related Donor Care in US Transplantation Centers

Recent investigations have found a higher incidence of adverse events associated with hematopoietic cell donation in related donors (RDs) who have morbidities that if present in an unrelated donor (UD) would preclude donation. In the UD setting, regulatory standards ensure independent assessment of donors, one of several crucial measures to safeguard donor health and safety. A survey conducted by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Donor Health and Safety Working Committee in 2007 reported a potential conflict of interest in >70% of US centers, where physicians had simultaneous responsibility for RDs and their recipients. Consequently, several international organizations have endeavored to improve practice through regulations and consensus recommendations. We hypothesized that the changes in the 2012 Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy and the Joint Accreditation Committee-International Society for Cellular Therapy and European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation standards resulting from the CIBMTR study would have significantly impacted practice. Accordingly, we conducted a follow-up survey of US transplantation centers to assess practice changes since 2007, and to investigate additional areas where RD care was predicted to differ from UD care. A total of 73 centers (53%), performing 79% of RD transplantations in the United States, responded. Significant improvements were observed since the earlier survey; 62% centers now ensure separation of RD and recipient care (P < .0001). This study identifies several areas where RD management does not meet international donor care standards, however. Particular concerns include counseling and assessment of donors before HLA typing, with 61% centers first disclosing donor HLA results to an individual other than the donor, the use of unlicensed mobilization agents, and the absence of long-term donor follow-up. Recommendations for improvement are made.

European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Centers with FACT-JACIE Accreditation Have Significantly Better Compliance with Related Donor Care Standards

Previous studies have identified healthcare practices that may place undue pressure on related donors (RDs) of hematopoietic cell products and an increase in serious adverse events associated with morbidities in this population. As a result, specific requirements to safeguard RD health have been introduced to Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy/The Joint Accreditation Committee ISCT and EBMT (FACT-JACIE) Standards, but the impact of accreditation on RD care has not previously been evaluated. A survey of transplant program directors of European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation member centers was conducted by the Donor Health and Safety Working Committee of the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research to test the hypothesis that RD care in FACT-JACIE accredited centers is more closely aligned with international consensus donor care recommendations than RD care delivered in centers without accreditation. Responses were received from 39% of 304 centers. Our results show that practice in accredited centers was much closer to recommended standards as compared with nonaccredited centers. Specifically, a higher percentage of accredited centers use eligibility criteria to assess RDs (93% versus 78%; P = .02), and a lower percentage have a single physician simultaneously responsible for an RD and their recipient (14% versus 35%; P = .008). In contrast, where regulatory standards do not exist, both accredited and nonaccredited centers fell short of accepted best practice. These results raise concerns that despite improvements in care, current practice can place undue pressure on donors and may increase the risk of donation-associated adverse events. We recommend measures to address these issues through enhancement of regulatory standards as well as national initiatives to standardize RD care.

A Review of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Australia and New Zealand, 2005 to 2013

This report describes hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) activity and outcome in Australia and New Zealand during the years 2005 to 2013. In 2013, 1018 autologous, 221 allogeneic with related donors, and 264 allogeneic with unrelated donors HCT were performed in 40 centers in Australia, with corresponding figures of 147, 39, and 47 in 6 centers in New Zealand. Annual numbers of HCT in 2013 increased, compared to 2005, by 25% in Australia and by 52% in New Zealand. The majority of both allogeneic and autologous HCT used peripheral blood as the stem cell source for all years studied. Major indications for transplantation were acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), plasma cell disorders, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Overall survival probabilities at 5 years after transplantation for adult (16+) allogeneic first HCT recipients were 54.2% for ALL, 46.0% for AML, 48.4% for myelodysplastic syndromes, and 58.6% for NHL. Consistent patterns over time include a steady increase in HCT, particularly for older recipients, relatively constant numbers of allografts using cord blood, and a recent increase in the number of allografts with 2 or more HLA-mismatched related donors.

Suitability Criteria for Adult Related Donors: A Consensus Statement from the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Standing Committee on Donor Issues

The number of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplants performed globally each year continues to increase. Advances in HLA typing, better supportive care, and administration of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens allow treatment of older patients with older sibling donors. Pretransplant donor assessment and testing are very important processes affecting the quality and safety of donation. For unrelated HSC donors detailed recommendations for health assessment have been published, allowing donation only if they are unrestrictedly healthy. Eligibility criteria for related donors are less strict and vary significantly between centers. In situations where a family donor does not meet the suitability criteria for unrelated donors, involved physicians often struggle with the decision whether the matched relative is suitable for donation or not. On behalf of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Standing Committee on Donor Issues, we intended to develop a consensus document with recommendations for donor workup and final clearance of family donors who would not be able to serve as unrelated donors because of their age or pre-existing diseases. This article covers different topics intending to support decision-making, with the goal of minimizing medical risk to the donor and protection of the recipient from transmissible diseases.

Cervical epidural hematoma in a healthy donor presenting stroke mimic symptoms: a rare adverse event following peripheral blood stem cell apheresis

Peripheral blood stem cell apheresis from a healthy donor is indispensable for allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Here, we report a rare adverse event following peripheral blood stem cell apheresis. A female sibling donor, aged 61 years with an unremarkable medical history, complained of pain in the left neck and shoulder and numbness in the left upper limb 1 h after the end of peripheral blood stem cell apheresis. Paralysis of the left upper and lower limbs appeared consecutively. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the head showed no abnormalities. Anticoagulant therapy was initiated according to the standard treatment of atherothrombotic brain infarction. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical cord on the following day revealed a cervical epidural hematoma. An emergency C4-C5 laminectomy was performed, and the paralysis was improved immediately after surgery. This report is the first case of cervical epidural hematoma in a healthy donor who underwent peripheral blood stem cell apheresis and presented symptoms confusingly similar to those of brain infarction.

Related hematopoietic cell donor care: is there a role for unrelated donor registries?

In almost half of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplants, a related donor (RD) is used, yet a lack of standardized guidelines means that their care is heterogeneous. Changes to regulatory standards aim to improve uniformity, but adherence to these regulations can prove logistically difficult for the transplant centers (TCs) managing RDs. Discussion has ensued around possible alternative models of related donor care and a session at the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) annual meeting in 2013 debated the question of whether a role exists for unrelated donor registries in the management of 'related' donors. In this overview, we discuss the issues raised at this debate and the pros and cons of donor registry involvement in various aspects of RD management. By examining existing models of related donor care that have been adopted by members of the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA), we look for ways to enhance and homogenize RD care, while also enabling transplant centers to meet standards required for mandatory accreditation.

Stem cell therapy for retinal diseases

In this review, we discuss about current knowledge about stem cell (SC) therapy in the treatment of retinal degeneration. Both human embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell has been growth in culture for a long time, and started to be explored in the treatment of blinding conditions. The Food and Drug Administration, recently, has granted clinical trials using SC retinal therapy to treat complex disorders, as Stargardt's dystrophy, and patients with geographic atrophy, providing good outcomes. This study's intent is to overview the critical regeneration of the subretinal anatomy through retinal pigment epithelium transplantation, with the goal of reestablish important pathways from the retina to the occipital cortex of the brain, as well as the differentiation from pluripotent quiescent SC to adult retina, and its relationship with a primary retinal injury, different techniques of transplantation, management of immune rejection and tumorigenicity, its potential application in improving patients' vision, and, finally, approaching future directions and challenges for the treatment of several conditions.

Volunteer unrelated donor experience after administration of filgrastim and apheresis for the collection of haemopoietic stem cells: the Australian perspective

BACKGROUND

Voluntary donations of peripheral blood stem cells after administration of filgrastim (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, G-CSF) are undertaken throughout the world by healthy individuals, but the short-, medium- and long-term adverse events during and after donation are not fully understood.

AIMS

We document the experience of donors of peripheral blood stem cells mobilised by G-CSF at Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry collection centres.

METHODS

When the Australian Bone Marrow Donor Registry commenced collecting mobilised peripheral blood stem cells, based on data used for registration of G-CSF, all adverse reactions in donors were documented prospectively to determine the rate and severity of events. A total of 512 consecutive first-time donors assessed between July 2001 and March 2010 were included in this study.

RESULTS

The median age at work-up was 40 years and 71% of donors were male. A large proportion of donors (91%) experienced bone pain during administration of G-CSF, and in fewer numbers headache (61%) and fatigue (61%). Bone pain was associated with a body mass index of overweight/obese (P = 0.03). Headache (P = 0.03), muscle pain (P = 0.03) and fatigue (P = 0.001) were all significantly associated with female sex. More than a quarter (28%) of donations involved a range of complications at collection.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of short- and medium-term symptoms and events observed provide support for the information provided to unrelated donors at counselling. Follow up of the consequences of unrelated voluntary donation remains important to provide accurate and relevant information to prospective donors.

Feasibility of marrow harvesting from pediatric sibling donors without hematopoietic growth factors and allotransfusion

We retrospectively studied 108 marrow harvests from 105 pediatric sibling donors. The median age of donors was 8 years (range: 1-15) and the median body weight was 27 kg (range: 10-100). The volumes of aspirated marrow were 5.0-23.8 mL/kg donor body weight, and harvested bone marrow volume exceeded 15 mL/kg in 42% of the donors. A total of 100 autologous blood donations were performed, and eight donors had red cells salvaged from their harvests reinfused. The median Hb levels before and after harvests were 12.3 g/dL (range: 10.0-14.7) and 11.0 g/dL (range: 8.9-13.8), respectively. None of the donors received allogeneic blood transfusions or hematopoietic growth factors such as EPO and G-CSF before or after collection. Transplanted dose was 1.4-10.8 × 10(8) cells/kg recipient body weight without differences due to donor age. Higher concentrations of nucleated and CD34(+) cells were obtained from younger donors. All donors tolerated the procedures well, with no serious complications. Thus, children may safely donate marrow for allogeneic transplantation, and the yields of nucleated cells for engraftment are substantial.

PBSC collection from family donors in Japan: a prospective survey

Severe adverse events (SAE) and late hematological malignancies have been reported after PBSC donation. No prospective data on incidence and risk factors have been available for family donors so far. The Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (JSHCT) introduced therefore in 2000 a mandatory registration system. It defined standards for donor eligibility and asked harvest centers to report any SAE immediately. All donors were examined at day 30 and were to be contacted once each year for a period of 5 years. Acute SAEs within day 30 were reported from 47/3264 donations (1.44%) with 14 events considered as unexpected and severe (0.58%). No donor died within 30 days. Late SAEs were reported from 39/1708 donors (2.3%). The incidence of acute SAEs was significantly higher among donors not matching the JSHCT standards (P=0.0023). Late hematological malignancies in PBSC donors were not different compared with a retrospective cohort of BM donors (N:1/1708 vs N:2/5921; P=0.53). In conclusion, acute and late SAEs do occur in PBSC donors at relatively low frequency but risk factors can be defined.

Towards a global system of vigilance and surveillance in unrelated donors of haematopoietic progenitor cells for transplantation

Safety of living donors is critical to the success of blood, tissue and organ transplantation. Structured and robust vigilance and surveillance systems exist as part of some national entities, but historically no global systems are in place to ensure conformity, harmonisation and the recognition of rare adverse events (AEs). The World Health Assembly has recently resolved to require AE/reaction (AE/R) reporting both nationally and globally. The World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) is an international organisation promoting the safety of unrelated donors and progenitor cell products for use in haematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) transplantation. To address this issue, we established a system for collecting, collating, analysing, distributing and reacting to serious adverse events and reactions (SAE/R) in unrelated HPC donors. The WMDA successfully instituted this reporting system with 203 SAE/R reported in 2011. The committee generated two rapid reports, reacting to specific SAE/R, resulting in practice changing policies. The system has a robust governance structure, formal feedback to the WMDA membership and transparent information flows to other agencies, specialist physicians and transplant programs and the general public.