Myeloablative T cell-depleted alloSCT with early sequential prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion is an efficient and safe post-remission treatment for adult ALL

Benefits and risks of clofarabine in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia investigated in depth by multi-state modeling

BACKGROUND

We recently reported results of the prospective, open-label HOVON-100 trial in 334 adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) randomized to first-line treatment with or without clofarabine (CLO). No improvement of event-free survival (EFS) was observed, while a higher proportion of patients receiving CLO obtained minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity.

AIM

In order to investigate the effects of CLO in more depth, two multi-state models were developed to identify why CLO did not show a long-term survival benefit despite more MRD-negativity.

METHODS

The first model evaluated the effect of CLO on going off-protocol (not due to refractory disease/relapse, completion or death) as a proxy of severe treatment-related toxicity, while the second model evaluated the effect of CLO on obtaining MRD negativity. The subsequent impact of these intermediate events on death or relapsed/refractory disease was assessed in both models.

RESULTS

Overall, patients receiving CLO went off-protocol more frequently than control patients (35/168 [21%] vs. 18/166 [11%], p = 0.019; HR 2.00 [1.13-3.52], p = 0.02), especially during maintenance (13/44 [30%] vs. 6/56 [11%]; HR 2.85 [95%CI 1.08-7.50], p = 0.035). Going off-protocol was, however, not associated with more relapse or death. Patients in the CLO arm showed a trend towards an increased rate of MRD-negativity compared with control patients (HR MRD-negativity: 1.35 [0.95-1.91], p = 0.10), which did not translate into a significant survival benefit.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the intermediate states, i.e., going off-protocol and MRD-negativity, were affected by adding CLO, but these transitions were not associated with subsequent survival estimates, suggesting relatively modest antileukemic activity in ALL.

The graft-versus-leukemia effect of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions after allogeneic stem cell transplantation is equally effective in relapse prevention but safer compared to spontaneous graft-versus-host disease

Therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusions (tDLI) are used to reinforce the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect in relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). In contrast, the role of prophylactic DLI (proDLI) in preventing leukemia relapse has been less clearly established, although supported by retrospective, case-control, and registry analyses. We report a prospective, monocentric, ten year cohort of patients with high risk acute leukemias (AL) or myelodysplasia (MDS) in whom proDLI were applied beyond day +120 post alloSCT to compensate for lack of GvL.272 consecutive allotransplanted AL or MDS patients in complete remission and off immunosuppression at day +120 were stratified according to the prior appearance of relevant GvHD (acute GvHD °II-IV or extensive chronic GvHD) as a clinical indicator for GvL. Escalating doses of unmodified proDLI were applied to 72/272 patients without prior relevant GvHD. Conversely, 157/272 patients with prior spontaneous GvHD did not receive proDLI, nor did 43/272 patients with contraindications (uncontrolled infections, patient refusal, DLI unavailability).By day 160-landmark analysis (median day of first DLI application), proDLI recipients had significantly higher five-year overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) (77% and 67%) than patients with spontaneous GvHD (54% and 53%) or with contraindications (46% and 45%) (p=0.003). Relapse incidence for patients with proDLI (30%) or spontaneous GvHD (29%) was significantly lower than in patients with contraindications (39%; p=0.021). With similar GvHD incidence beyond day +160, non-relapse mortality (NRM) was less with proDLI (5%) than without proDLI (18%; p=0.036).In conclusion, proDLI may be able to compensate for lack of GvL in alloSCT recipients with high risk AL or MDS.

Joint models quantify associations between immune cell kinetics and allo-immunological events after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and subsequent donor lymphocyte infusion

Alloreactive donor-derived T-cells play a pivotal role in alloimmune responses after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT); both in the relapse-preventing Graft-versus-Leukemia (GvL) effect and the potentially lethal complication Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD). The balance between GvL and GvHD can be shifted by removing T-cells via T-cell depletion (TCD) to reduce the risk of GvHD, and by introducing additional donor T-cells (donor lymphocyte infusions [DLI]) to boost the GvL effect. However, the association between T-cell kinetics and the occurrence of allo-immunological events has not been clearly demonstrated yet. Therefore, we investigated the complex associations between the T-cell kinetics and alloimmune responses in a cohort of 166 acute leukemia patients receiving alemtuzumab-based TCD alloSCT. Of these patients, 62 with an anticipated high risk of relapse were scheduled to receive a prophylactic DLI at 3 months after transplant. In this setting, we applied joint modelling which allowed us to better capture the complex interplay between DLI, T-cell kinetics, GvHD and relapse than traditional statistical methods. We demonstrate that DLI can induce detectable T-cell expansion, leading to an increase in total, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts starting at 3 months after alloSCT. CD4+ T-cells showed the strongest association with the development of alloimmune responses: higher CD4 counts increased the risk of GvHD (hazard ratio 2.44, 95% confidence interval 1.45-4.12) and decreased the risk of relapse (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.92). Similar models showed that natural killer cells recovered rapidly after alloSCT and were associated with a lower risk of relapse (HR 0.62, 95%-CI 0.41-0.93). The results of this study advocate the use of joint models to further study immune cell kinetics in different settings.

Post-transplant maintenance therapy in acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation harmonizing multiple therapeutic modalities including targeted therapy, immunotherapy and cellular therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) has improved survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially for those at high risk of relapse. However, relapse remains the leading cause of treatment failure post-HCT, occurring in around 35-45% of patients, and leading to dismal outcomes. Strategies to reduce relapse risk are urgently needed, especially in the early post-transplant period before activation of the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. Maintenance therapy is a course of treatment given post-HCT with the expectation of reducing relapse risk. While there are currently no therapies approved for maintenance therapy for AML after HCT, there are a number of studies and ongoing investigations examining the role of maintenance therapies that include targeted agents against FLT3-ITD, BCL2, or IDH mutations, hypomethylating agents, immunomodulatory therapies and cellular therapies. In this review, we discuss the mechanistic and clinical data for post-transplant maintenance therapies in AML and strategies for maintenance therapy for AML after HCT.

Pre-emptive and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an allogenic immunotherapy used after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. DLI takes advantage of the graft-versus-tumor effect induced by the infused CD3 + T cells, but may induce graft-versus-host disease. To date, DLI has been attempted to prevent hematological relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with mixed chimerism and molecular relapse (pre-emptive DLI), and as maintenance therapy in patients with high-risk hematological malignancies (prophylactic DLI). DLI response and efficacy depend on patient, disease, and DLI factors. This review discusses the efficacy and risks of DLI, with a focus on pre-emptive and prophylactic use.

Competitive Repopulation and Allo-Immunologic Pressure Determine Chimerism Kinetics after T Cell-Depleted Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Donor Lymphocyte Infusion

After allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), patient-derived stem cells that survived the pretransplantation conditioning compete with engrafting donor stem cells for bone marrow (BM) repopulation. In addition, donor-derived alloreactive T cells present in the stem cell product may favor establishment of complete donor-derived hematopoiesis by eliminating patient-derived lymphohematopoietic cells. T cell-depleted alloSCT with sequential transfer of potentially alloreactive T cells by donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) provides a unique opportunity to selectively study how competitive repopulation and allo-immunologic pressure influence lymphohematopoietic recovery. This study aimed to determine the relative contribution of competitive repopulation and donor-derived anti-recipient alloimmunologic pressure on the establishment of lymphohematopoietic chimerism after alloSCT. In this retrospective cohort study of 281 acute leukemia patients treated according to a protocol combining alemtuzumab-based T cell-depleted alloSCT with prophylactic DLI, we investigated engraftment and quantitative donor chimerism in the BM and immune cell subsets. DLI-induced increase of chimerism and development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were analyzed as complementary indicators for donor-derived anti-recipient alloimmunologic pressure. Profound suppression of patient immune cells by conditioning sufficed for sustained engraftment without necessity for myeloablative conditioning or development of clinically significant GVHD. Although 61% of the patients without any DLI or GVHD showed full donor chimerism (FDC) in the BM at 6 months after alloSCT, only 24% showed FDC in the CD4⁺ T cell compartment. In contrast, 75% of the patients who had received DLI and 83% of the patients with clinically significant GVHD had FDC in this compartment. In addition, 72% of the patients with mixed hematopoiesis receiving DLI converted to complete donor-derived hematopoiesis, of whom only 34% developed clinically significant GVHD. Our data show that competitive repopulation can be sufficient to reach complete donor-derived hematopoiesis, but that some alloimmunologic pressure is needed for the establishment of a completely donor-derived T cell compartment, either by the development of GVHD or by administration of DLI. We illustrate that it is possible to separate the graft-versus-leukemia effect from GVHD, as conversion to durable complete donor-derived hematopoiesis following DLI did not require induction of clinically significant GVHD.

Donor-derived multiple leukemia antigen-specific T-cell therapy to prevent relapse after transplant in patients with ALL

Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a curative option for patients with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), but relapse remains a major cause of treatment failure. To prevent disease relapse, we prepared and infused donor-derived multiple leukemia antigen-specific T cells (mLSTs) targeting PRAME, WT1, and survivin, which are leukemia-associated antigens frequently expressed in B- and T-ALL. Our goal was to maximize the graft-versus-leukemia effect while minimizing the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We administered mLSTs (dose range, 0.5 × 107 to 2 × 107 cells per square meter) to 11 patients with ALL (8 pediatric, 3 adult), and observed no dose-limiting toxicity, acute GVHD or cytokine release syndrome. Six of 8 evaluable patients remained in long-term complete remission (median: 46.5 months; range, 9-51). In these individuals we detected an increased frequency of tumor-reactive T cells shortly after infusion, with activity against both targeted and nontargeted, known tumor-associated antigens, indicative of in vivo antigen spreading. By contrast, this in vivo amplification was absent in the 2 patients who experienced relapse. In summary, infusion of donor-derived mLSTs after allogeneic HSCT is feasible and safe and may contribute to disease control, as evidenced by in vivo tumor-directed T-cell expansion. Thus, this approach represents a promising strategy for preventing relapse in patients with ALL.

Long-term results and GvHD after prophylactic and preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia

We report on 318 patients with acute leukemia, receiving donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) in complete hematologic remission (CHR) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). DLI were applied preemptively (preDLI) for minimal residual disease (MRD, n = 23) or mixed chimerism (MC, n = 169), or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients with complete chimerism and molecular remission (proDLI, n = 126). Median interval from alloSCT to DLI1 was 176 days, median follow-up was 7.0 years. Five-year cumulative relapse incidence (CRI), non-relapse mortality (NRM), leukemia-free and overall survival (LFS/OS) of the entire cohort were 29.1%, 12.7%, 58.2%, and 64.3%. Cumulative incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) grade II-IV°/chronic GvHD were 11.9%/31%. Nineteen patients (6%) died from DLI-induced GvHD. Age ≥60 years (p = 0.046), advanced stage at transplantation (p = 0.003), shorter interval from transplantation (p = 0.018), and prior aGvHD ≥II° (p = 0.036) were risk factors for DLI-induced GvHD. GvHD did not influence CRI, but was associated with NRM and lower LFS/OS. Efficacy of preDLI was demonstrated by decreasing MRD/increasing blood counts in 71%, and increasing chimerism in 70%. Five-year OS after preDLI for MRD/MC was 51%/68% among responders, and 37% among non-responders. The study describes response and outcome of DLI in CHR and helps to identify candidates without increased risk of severe GvHD.

Therapeutic strategies, including allogeneic stem cell transplantation, to overcome relapsed/refractory adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

The long-term survival of relapsed/refractory (R/R) adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is quite poor, and early T-cell precursor (ETP) ALL has recently been described as a high-risk T-ALL subgroup. However, the optimal therapeutic approach to R/R adult T-ALL remains poorly established.

AREAS COVERED

At present, cytoreductive therapy followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is considered to be the most clinically relevant and curative modality for R/R T-ALL. Above all, achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) is a key factor for successful allo-SCT and maintaining long-term remission for R/R patients. As a salvage regimen, nelarabine is the only therapy that was specifically approved for use in patients with R/R T-ALL. A combination of conventional chemotherapeutic agents and novel agents, such as venetoclax, can be used as alternatives for cytoreduction and bridging to transplantation. Relevant literatures published in the last 30 years were searched from PubMed to review the topic of T-ALL, and allo-SCT.

EXPERT OPINION

An effective salvage regimen, to achieve negative MRD, followed by allo-SCT is currently the best way to improve the clinical outcomes of adult R/R T-ALL. Moreover, posttransplant therapies, such as prophylactic or preemptive donor leukocyte infusion and hypomethylating agents, need to be considered as sequential therapy.

Repetitively Administered Low-Dose Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Prevention of Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk Acute Leukemia

Simple Summary

Patients with high-risk acute leukemia (AL) have a high risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pro-DLI) has shown significant efficacy in reducing relapse rate but its widespread application has been limited due to concerns of graft versus host disease (GVHD) development. In the present study, we tested the safety and efficacy of a novel method of pro-DLI based on repetitive administration of low lymphocyte doses. Low-dose pro-DLI was administered every two months for at least 3-years. Forty-four high-risk AL patients with a median age of 53-years who underwent allo-SCT from a matched-sibling (38pts) or a matched-unrelated donor (6pts) received pro-DLI. Acute and chronic-GVHD developed in 14% and 12% of patients. With a median follow-up of 44-months, the cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality was 12% and 13%, while the overall survival was 78%. Prolonged up to 3-years low-dose pro-DLI administered every two months is safe and effective in reducing relapse rate in patients with high-risk AL. The low-dose repetitive administration DLI strategy reduced the risk of DLI-mediated GVHD, while the prolonged repeated administration helped in preventing relapse, possibly by inducing a sustained and prolonged immunological pressure on residual leukemic cells.

Abstract

Background: Patients with high-risk acute leukemia have a high risk of relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In an effort to reduce the relapse rate, various therapeutic methods have been implemented into clinical practice. Among them, prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pro-DLI) has shown significant efficacy. However, the widespread application of pro-DLI has been restricted mostly due to concerns regarding the development of graft versus host disease (GVHD). In the present study, we tested the safety and efficacy of a novel method of prophylactic-DLI based by repetitive administration of low lymphocyte doses. Methods: DLI was administered to patients with high-risk acute leukemia at a dose of 2 × 10⁶/kg CD3-positive cells. DLI at the same dose was repeated every two months for at least 36 months post-allo-SCT, or until relapse or any clinical or laboratory feature suggested GVHD, whichever occurred first. Forty-four patients with a median age of 53 years (range 20–67) who underwent allo-SCT between 2011 and 2020 were included in our study. Thirty-three patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 11 with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after allo-SCT from a matched sibling (MSD, no = 38 pts) or a matched-unrelated donor (MUD, no = 6 pts) received pro-DLI. Twenty-three patients were in CR1, all with unfavorable genetic features; 12 patients were in CR2 or beyond; and 9 patients had refractory disease at the time of transplant. Ten out of 23 patients in CR1 had detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) at the time of allo-SCT. Disease risk index (DRI) was high and intermediate in 21 and 23 patients, respectively. Conditioning was myeloablative (MAC) in 36 and reduced intensity (RIC) in 8 patients, while GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine-A in combination with low-dose alemtuzumab in 39 patients or with low-dose MTX in 5 patients, respectively. Results: Thirty-five patients completed the scheduled treatment and received a median of 8 DLI doses (range 1–35). Fifteen out of 35 patients received all planned doses, while DLI was discontinued in 20 patients. Reasons for discontinuation included GVHD development in nine, donor unavailability in seven, disease relapse in three, and secondary malignancy in one patient, respectively. Nine patients were still on treatment with DLI, and they received a median of four (range 2–12) doses. Fourteen percent of patients developed transient grade-II acute GVHD while 12% developed chronic GVHD post-DLI administration. Acute GVHD was managed successfully with short course steroids, and four out of five patients with cGVHD were disease-free and off immunosuppression. With a median follow-up of 44 months (range 8–120), relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 74%, (95% CI, 54–87%) and 78%, (95% CI, 58–89%) respectively, while the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 13% (95% CI, 4–28%). The cumulative incidence of relapse in patients with intermediate and high DRI is 7% and 15%, respectively. Conclusion: Prolonged—up to three years—low-dose pro-DLI administered every two months is safe and effective in reducing relapse rate in patients with high-risk acute leukemia. The low-dose repetitive administration DLI strategy reduced the risk of DLI-mediated GVHD, while the prolonged repeated administration helped in preventing relapse, possibly by inducing a sustained and prolonged immunological pressure on residual leukemic cells. This novel strategy deserves testing in larger cohort of patients with high-risk acute leukemia.

Prophylactic modified donor lymphocyte infusion after low-dose ATG-F-based haploidentical HSCT with myeloablative conditioning in high-risk acute leukemia: a matched-pair analysis

Both haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) exhibit strong graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect. However, the role of prophylactic DLI following haploidentical HSCT remains unclear. Here, 34 patients with high-risk acute leukemia who underwent low-dose anti-T-lymphocyte globulin-Fresenius (ATG-F)-based myeloablative haploidentical HSCT and prophylactic modified DLI (pro-DLI) were well-matched with patients without pro-DLI. The 5-year overall survival (OS) (67.8% versus 41.3%, P < 0.01) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) (64.6% versus 33.9%, P < 0.01) of pro-DLI cohort were superior to the control cohort. A slightly higher GVHD-free/relapse-free survival was found in the pro-DLI cohort (32.8% versus 16.3%, P = 0.32). The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse of the pro-DLI recipients was significantly lower than that of the control cohort (14.7% versus 49.3%, P = 0.01). The cumulative incidence of grades II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD at 100 days after pro-DLI was 17.6% and 9.1%, respectively. There was no difference between the two cohorts in terms of the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD and non-relapse mortality. Data from the multivariate analysis demonstrated that pro-DLI was an independent protective variable for LFS (P = 0.01, hazard ratio {HR} = 0.35), OS (P = 0.01, HR = 0.32), and relapse (P = 0.02, HR = 0.33). Taken together, we demonstrate that pro-DLI after ATG-F-based HSCT effectively decreases the risk of relapse and improves long-term survival of patients with high-risk acute leukemia without increasing treatment toxicity.

HA-1H T-Cell Receptor Gene Transfer to Redirect Virus-Specific T Cells for Treatment of Hematological Malignancies After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Phase 1 Clinical Study

Graft-vs.-leukemia (GVL) reactivity after HLA-matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is mainly mediated by donor T cells recognizing minor histocompatibility antigens (MiHA). If MiHA are targeted that are exclusively expressed on hematopoietic cells of recipient origin, selective GVL reactivity without severe graft-vs.-host-disease (GVHD) may occur. In this phase I study we explored HA-1H TCR gene transfer into T cells harvested from the HA-1H negative stem-cell donor to treat HA-1H positive HLA-A^*02:01 positive patients with high-risk leukemia after alloSCT. HA-1H is a hematopoiesis-restricted MiHA presented in HLA-A^*02:01. Since we previously demonstrated that donor-derived virus-specific T-cell infusions did not result in GVHD, we used donor-derived EBV and/or CMV-specific T-cells to be redirected by HA-1H TCR. EBV and/or CMV-specific T-cells were purified, retrovirally transduced with HA-1H TCR, and expanded. Validation experiments illustrated dual recognition of viral antigens and HA-1H by HA-1H TCR-engineered virus-specific T-cells. Release criteria included products containing more than 60% antigen-specific T-cells. Patients with high risk leukemia following T-cell depleted alloSCT in complete or partial remission were eligible. HA-1H TCR T-cells were infused 8 and 14 weeks after alloSCT without additional pre-conditioning chemotherapy. For 4/9 included patients no appropriate products could be made. Their donors were all CMV-negative, thereby restricting the production process to EBV-specific T-cells. For 5 patients a total of 10 products could be made meeting the release criteria containing 3–280 × 10⁶ virus and/or HA-1H TCR T-cells. No infusion-related toxicity, delayed toxicity or GVHD occurred. One patient with relapsed AML at time of infusions died due to rapidly progressing disease. Four patients were in remission at time of infusion. Two patients died of infections during follow-up, not likely related to the infusion. Two patients are alive and well without GVHD. In 2 patients persistence of HA-1H TCR T-cells could be illustrated correlating with viral reactivation, but no overt in-vivo expansion of infused T-cells was observed. In conclusion, HA-1H TCR-redirected virus-specific T-cells could be made and safely infused in 5 patients with high-risk AML, but overall feasibility and efficacy was too low to warrant further clinical development using this strategy. New strategies will be explored using patient-derived donor T-cells isolated after transplantation transduced with HA-1H-specific TCR to be infused following immune conditioning.

Effect of alemtuzumab-based T-cell depletion on graft compositional change in vitro and immune reconstitution early after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND AIMS

To reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), T-cell depletion (TCD) of grafts can be performed by the addition of alemtuzumab (ALT) "to the bag" (in vitro) before transplantation. In this prospective study, the authors analyzed the effect of in vitro incubation with 20 mg ALT on the composition of grafts prior to graft infusion. Furthermore, the authors assessed whether graft composition at the moment of infusion was predictive for T-cell reconstitution and development of GVHD early after TCD alloSCT.

METHODS

Sixty granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized stem cell grafts were obtained from ≥9/10 HLA-matched related and unrelated donors. The composition of the grafts was analyzed by flow cytometry before and after in vitro incubation with ALT. T-cell reconstitution and incidence of severe GVHD were monitored until 12 weeks after transplantation.

RESULTS

In vitro incubation of grafts with 20 mg ALT resulted in an initial median depletion efficiency of T-cell receptor (TCR) α/β T cells of 96.7% (range, 63.5-99.8%), followed by subsequent depletion in vivo. Graft volumes and absolute leukocyte counts of grafts before the addition of ALT were not predictive for the efficiency of TCR α/β T-cell depletion. CD4^pos T cells were depleted more efficiently than CD8^pos T cells, and naive and regulatory T cells were depleted more efficiently than memory and effector T cells. This differential depletion of T-cell subsets was in line with their reported differential CD52 expression. In vitro depletion efficiencies and absolute numbers of (naive) TCR α/β T cells in the grafts after ALT incubation were not predictive for T-cell reconstitution or development of GVHD post- alloSCT.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of ALT to the bag is an easy, fast and generally applicable strategy to prevent GVHD in patients receiving alloSCT after myeloablative or non-myeloablative conditioning because of the efficient differential depletion of donor-derived lymphocytes and T cells.

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse prevention: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Primary disease relapse (PDR) of malignant hematologic conditions after standard hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is one of the most challenging diseases; therefore ongoing researches are aiming at relapse prevention and minimizing the transplant-related side effects. Prophylactic donor lymphocytes (pDLI) had been proposed as a valuable strategy for PDR prevention, but early studies had been discouraging due to the limited benefit and possible association with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

METHOD

We performed a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Embase database from inception to May 2019 for studies that evaluated the association between pDLI and PDR. We conducted a random effect meta-analysis of 9 studies involving a total of 748 participants (pDLI = 398, non-pDLI = 350) and reported the pooled odd ratio (OR) for association of pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

RESULT

We found a significant decreased odd of PDR in the pDLI group (pooled OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.58, I2 = 0%), but there was no significant increased odd of aGVHD (pooled OR of 0.98, 95% CI 0.56-1.72, I2 = 0.8%). We also found that there was an increased odd of overall survival (OS) (pooled OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.85-5.45, I2 = 50.2%).

CONCLUSION

There are significantly decreased odd of PDR and increased odd of OS in the pDLI group compared to the control group, but there is no statistically significant increased odd of aGVHD as suggested by previous studies. We concluded that pDLI is a potentially valuable method for post-transplant PDR prevention.

Dose escalation prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion after T-cell depleted matched related donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is feasible and results in higher donor chimerism, faster immune re-constitution, and prolonged progression-free survival

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (pDLI) is a potential intervention to prolong remission for patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), however, the optimal timing and dose are unknown. We conducted a prospective trial exploring the feasibility of early withdrawal of immunosuppression (WOI) at day 60 followed by dose escalation of pDLI after alemtuzumab-based, T-cell depleted conditioning for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. pDLI were administered at day 75 to day 90 and again in 4-8 week intervals with receipt of up to 5 pDLI infusions. Fourty-six patients with matched-related donors (MRD) and 29 patients with matched-unrelated donors (MUD) were considered. Twenty-eight MRD patients were able to undergo WOI, 26 patients (93%) received at least 1 DLI, 16 patients (57%) received 3+, and 7 patients (25%) received 5 pDLI. Only 7 MUD patients were able to undergo WOI, 4 (57%) received at least 1 pDLI, 1 patient (14%) received 3 DLI, and no patients received all 5. Median PFS for patients on the study was 366 days. The estimated 2-year PFS and OS rates for all patients were 41% (95% CI, 32-54%) and 51% (95% CI, 41-63%) compared with 57% (95% CI, 41-77%) and 67% (95% CI, 52-86%) for patients who received at least one pDLI. In addition, MRD patients receiving pDLI had faster immune re-constitution and improved donor chimerism. Our trial proposes a novel dosage and treatment schedule for pDLI that is tolerable for patients who have received MRD allo-SCT and leads to improved outcomes.

Immunological and Clinical Impact of Manipulated and Unmanipulated DLI after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation of AML Patients

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the preferred curative treatment for several hematological malignancies. The efficacy of allo-SCT depends on the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. However, the prognosis of patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following allo-SCT is poor. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is utilized after allo-SCT in this setting to prevent relapse, to prolong progression free survival, to establish full donor chimerism and to restore the GvL effect in patients with hematological malignancies. Thus, there are different options for the administration of DLI in AML patients. DLI is currently used prophylactically and in the setting of an overt relapse. In addition, in the minimal residual disease (MRD) setting, DLI may be a possibility to improve overall survival. However, DLI might increase the risk of severe life-threatening complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) as well as severe infections. The transfusion of lymphocytes has been tested not only for the treatment of hematological malignancies but also chronic infections. In this context, manipulated DLI in a prophylactic or therapeutic approach are an option, e.g., virus-specific DLI using different selection methods or antigen-specific DLI such as peptide-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). In addition, T cells are also genetically engineered, using both chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) genetically modified T cells and T cell receptor (TCR) genetically modified T cells. T cell therapies in general have the potential to enhance antitumor immunity, augment vaccine efficacy, and limit graft-versus-host disease after allo-SCT. The focus of this review is to discuss the different strategies to use donor lymphocytes after allo-SCT. Our objective is to give an insight into the functional effects of DLI on immunogenic antigen recognition for a better understanding of the mechanisms of DLI. To ultimately increase the GvL potency without raising the risk of GvHD at the same time.

Long-Term Molecular Remission Achieved by Antibody Anti-CD22 and Ponatinib in a Patient Affected by Ph'+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapsed after Second Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Case Report

Ph'+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph'+-ALL) is an oncohematologic disorder for which allogeneic bone marrow transplantation still offers the only chance of cure. However, relapse is the main reason for treatment failure, also after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). New drugs, such as third generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and monoclonal antibodies, have expanded the therapeutic landscape, especially in patients who relapsed before HSCT. Very few reports, up to now, have described the use of both classes of these new agents in combination with donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) in the setting of patients who relapsed after HSCT. We report on a young patient affected by Ph'+-ALL, who relapsed after the second HSCT and who reached molecular remission and long-term disease control by treatment with the anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody inotuzumab ozogamicin, DLI, and the 3rd generation TKI ponatinib.

The allogeneic HLA-DP-restricted T-cell repertoire provoked by allogeneic dendritic cells contains T cells that show restricted recognition of hematopoietic cells including primary malignant cells

Stem cell grafts from 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donors are often mismatched for HLA-DP. In some patients, donor T-cell responses targeting the mismatched HLA-DP allele(s) have been found to induce a specific graft-versus-leukemia effect without coinciding graft-versus-host disease, whereas in other cases significant graft-versus-host disease occurred. Cell-lineage-specific recognition patterns within the allogeneic HLA-DP-specific donor T-cell repertoire could explain the differential clinical effects mediated by donor T cells after HLA-DP-mismatched allogeneic stem cell transplantation. To unravel the composition of the HLA-DP T-cell repertoire, donor T-cell responses were provoked by in vitro stimulation with allogeneic HLA-DP-mismatched monocyte-derived dendritic cells. A strategy including depletion of reactivity against autologous dendritic cells allowed efficient identification and enrichment of allo-reactive T cells upon stimulation with HLA-DP-mismatched dendritic cells. In this study we elucidated that the allogeneic HLA-DP-restricted T-cell repertoire contained T cells with differential cell-lineage-specific recognition profiles. As expected, some of the allogeneic HLA-DP-restricted T cells showed broad recognition of a variety of hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cell types expressing the targeted mismatched HLA-DP allele. However, a significant proportion of the allogeneic HLA-DP-restricted T cells showed restricted recognition of hematopoietic cells, including primary malignant cells, or even restricted recognition of only myeloid cells, including dendritic cells and primary acute myeloid leukemia samples, but not of other hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cell types. These data demonstrate that the allogeneic HLA-DP-specific T-cell repertoire contains T cells that show restricted recognition of hematopoietic cells, which may contribute to the specific graft-versus-leukemia effect without coinciding graft-versus-host disease.

Prevention and treatment of relapse after stem cell transplantation by cellular therapies

Despite recent advances in reducing therapy-related mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure and little progress has been achieved in the last decades. At the 3rd International Workshop on Biology, Prevention, and Treatment of Relapse held in Hamburg/Germany in November 2016 international experts presented and discussed recent developments in the field. Here, the potential of cellular therapies including unspecific and specific T cells, genetically modified T cells, CAR-T cells, NK-cells, and second allografting in prevention and treatment of relapse after alloSCT are summarized.

Tissue Damage Caused by Myeloablative, but Not Non-Myeloablative, Conditioning before Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Results in Dermal Macrophage Recruitment without Active T-Cell Interaction

Introduction

Conditioning regimens preceding allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can cause tissue damage and acceleration of the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). T-cell-depleted alloSCT with postponed donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) may reduce GVHD, because tissue injury can be restored at the time of DLI. In this study, we investigated the presence of tissue injury and inflammation in skin during the period of hematologic recovery and immune reconstitution after alloSCT.

Methods

Skin biopsies were immunohistochemically stained for HLA class II, CD1a, CD11c, CD40, CD54, CD68, CD86, CD206, CD3, and CD8. HLA class II-expressing cells were characterized as activated T-cells, antigen-presenting cells (APCs), or tissue repairing macrophages. In sex-mismatched patient and donor couples, origin of cells was determined by multiplex analysis combining XY-FISH and fluorescent immunohistochemistry.

Results

No inflammatory environment due to pretransplant conditioning was detected at the time of alloSCT, irrespective of the conditioning regimen. An increase in HLA class II-positive macrophages and CD3 T-cells was observed 12–24 weeks after myeloablative alloSCT, but these macrophages did not show signs of interaction with the co-localized T-cells. In contrast, during GVHD, an increase in HLA class II-expressing cells coinciding with T-cell interaction was observed, resulting in an overt inflammatory reaction with the presence of activated APC, activated donor T-cells, and localized upregulation of HLA class II expression on epidermal cells. In the absence of GVHD, patient derived macrophages were gradually replaced by donor-derived macrophages although patient-derived macrophages were detectable even 24 weeks after alloSCT.

Conclusion

Conditioning regimens cause tissue damage in the skin, but this does not result in a local increase of activated APC. In contrast to the inflamed situation in GVHD, when interaction takes place between activated APC and donor T-cells, the tissue damage caused by myeloablative alloSCT results in dermal recruitment of HLA class II-positive tissue repairing macrophages co-existing with increased numbers of patient- and donor-derived T-cells, but without signs of specific interaction and initiation of an immune response. Thus, the local skin damage caused by the conditioning regimen appears to be insufficient as single factor to provoke GVHD induction.

Graft versus tumor effects and why people relapse

Graft-versus-tumor (GVT) reactivity mediated by donor T cells in the context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is one of the most potent forms of cellular immunotherapy. The antitumor effect against hematologic malignancies is mediated by a polyclonal T-cell response targeting polymorphic antigens expressed on hematopoietic tissues of the recipient, leaving donor hematopoiesis in the patient after transplantation unharmed. Fortunately, hematopoietic tissues (including malignant hematopoietic cell populations) are relatively susceptible to T-cell recognition. If, however, nonhematopoietic tissues of the recipient are targeted as well, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) will occur. The balance between GVT and GVHD is influenced by the genetic disparity between donor and recipient, the number and origin of professional antigen-presenting cells provoking the immune response, the target antigen specificity, magnitude and diversity of the response, and the in vivo inflammatory environment, whereas inhibitory factors may silence the immune response. Manipulation of each of these factors will determine the balance between GVT and GVHD.

Cellular Immunotherapy for Hematologic Malignancies: Beyond Bone Marrow Transplantation

Immunotherapy has changed treatment practices for many hematologic malignancies. Even in the current era of targeted therapy, chemotherapy remains the backbone of treatment for many hematologic malignancies, especially in acute leukemias, where relapse remains the major cause of mortality. Application of novel immunotherapies in hematology attempts to harness the killing power of the immune system against leukemia and lymphoma. Cellular immunotherapy is evolving rapidly for high-risk hematologic disorders. Recent advances include chimeric antigen-receptor T cells, mesenchymal stromal/stem cells, dendritic cell tumor vaccines, cytokine-induced killer cells, and virus-specific T cells. The advantages of nontransplantation cellular immunotherapy include suitability for patients for whom transplantation has failed or is contraindicated, and a potentially less-toxic treatment alternative to transplantation for relapsed/refractory patients. This review examines those emerging cellular immunotherapies that are changing treatment paradigms for patients with hematologic malignancies.

Donor T-cell responses and disease progression patterns of multiple myeloma

Donor T-cells transferred after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can result in long-term disease control in myeloma by the graft-versus-myeloma (GvM) effect. However, T-cell therapy may show differential effectiveness against bone marrow (BM) infiltration and focal myeloma lesions resulting in different control and progression patterns. Outcomes of 43 myeloma patients who underwent T-cell-depleted alloSCT with scheduled donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) were analyzed with respect to diffuse BM infiltration and focal progression. For comparison, 12 patients for whom a donor search was started but no alloSCT was performed, were analyzed. After DLI, complete disappearance of myeloma cells in BM occurred in 86% of evaluable patients. The probabilities of BM progression-free survival (PFS) at 2 years after start of donor search, alloSCT and DLI, were 17% (95% confidence interval 0-38%), 51% (36-66%), and 62% (44-80%) respectively. In contrast, the probabilities of focal PFS at 2 years after start of donor search, alloSCT and DLI, were 17% (0-38%), 30% (17-44%) and 28% (11-44%), respectively. Donor-derived T-cell responses effectively reduce BM infiltration, but not focal progression in myeloma, illustrating potent immunological responses in BM with only limited effect of T-cells on focal lesions.

Optimizing peripheral blood stem cells transplantation outcome through amend relapse and graft failure: a review of current literature

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been considered as a valuable approach in treatment of numerous malignant and none malignant hematologic disorders. However, relapse and poor graft function (PGF) after allo-SCT remain to be controversial issues which may affect the transplantation outcome. Relevant articles were searched in MEDLINE database (2000–2016) using keywords and phrases: donor lymphocyte infusions, allogeneic stem cells transplantation, relapsed hematologic malignancies, booster schedules, cell dose, laboratory monitoring protocols and technical aspects of apheresis. Relapse of disease and PGF could be reduced via noting some main points such as choosing the suitable time and patient for donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) and also determination of patients who ought to candidate for second allogeneic HSCT or for the use of stem cell boost. DLI and stem cell booster are promising treatment strategies noted in this review. Finally, this paper discusses indications and technical aspects of DLI and stem cell booster in hematological malignancies and emphasizes their therapeutic or pre-emptive potentials.

Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Leukemia

The success of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) lies with the ability of the engrafting immune system to remove residual leukemia cells via a graft-versus-leukemia effect (GvL), caused either spontaneously post-HSCT or via donor lymphocyte infusion. GvL effects can also be initiated by allogenic mismatched natural killer cells, antigen-specific T cells, and activated dendritic cells of leukemic origin. The history and further application of this GvL effect and the main mechanisms will be discussed and reviewed in this chapter.

Selective graft-versus-leukemia depends on magnitude and diversity of the alloreactive T cell response

Patients with leukemia who receive a T cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell graft followed by postponed donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) can experience graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reactivity, with a lower risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Here, we have investigated the magnitude, diversity, and specificity of alloreactive CD8 T cells in patients who developed GVL reactivity after DLI in the absence or presence of GVHD. We observed a lower magnitude and diversity of CD8 T cells for minor histocompatibility antigens (MiHAs) in patients with selective GVL reactivity without GVHD. Furthermore, we demonstrated that MiHA-specific T cell clones from patients with selective GVL reactivity showed lower reactivity against nonhematopoietic cells, even when pretreated with inflammatory cytokines. Expression analysis of MiHA-encoding genes showed that similar types of antigens were recognized in both patient groups, but in patients who developed GVHD, T cell reactivity was skewed to target broadly expressed MiHAs. As an inflammatory environment can render nonhematopoietic cells susceptible to T cell recognition, prevention of such circumstances favors induction of selective GVL reactivity without development of GVHD.

Donor lymphocyte infusion after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is considered the cornerstone in the treatment of several malignant and not malignant hematological diseases. However, relapse of hematological disease after allo-SCT is considered the most challenging point in the field. The risk can be reduced through optimal patients, donor and disease selection before allo-SCT, but harnessing donor immune system is an appealing way to treat or avoid disease relapse. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a simple and effective therapy after allo-SCT. In this paper, the efficacy of DLI will be analyzed in different hematological diseases, focusing also on their therapeutic or pre-emptive use.

Novel immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of acute leukemia (myeloid and lymphoblastic)

There have been major advances in our understanding of the multiple interactions between malignant cells and the innate and adaptive immune system. While the attention of immunologists has hitherto focused on solid tumors, the specific immunobiology of acute leukemias is now becoming defined. These discoveries have pointed the way to immune interventions building on the established graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect from hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) and extending immunotherapy beyond HSCT to individuals with acute leukemia with a diversity of immune manipulations early in the course of the leukemia. At present, clinical results are in their infancy. In the coming years larger studies will better define the place of immunotherapy in the management of acute leukemias and lead to treatment approaches that combine conventional chemotherapy, immunotherapy and HSCT to achieve durable cures.

Multi-state analysis illustrates treatment success after stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia followed by donor lymphocyte infusion

In the field of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the common approach is to focus outcome analyses on time to relapse and death, without assessing the impact of post-transplant interventions. We investigated whether a multi-state model would give insight into the events after transplantation in a cohort of patients who were transplanted using a strategy including scheduled donor lymphocyte infusions. Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent myeloablative T-cell depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome were studied. We constructed a multi-state model to analyze the impact of donor lymphocyte infusion and graft-versus-host disease on the probabilities of relapse and non-relapse mortality over time. Based on this model we introduced a new measure for outcome after transplantation which we called 'treatment success': being alive without relapse and immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease. All relevant clinical events were implemented into the multi-state model and were denoted treatment success or failure (either transient or permanent). Both relapse and non-relapse mortality were causes of failure of comparable magnitude. Whereas relapse was the dominant cause of failure from the transplantation state, its rate was reduced after graft-versus-host disease, and especially after donor lymphocyte infusion. The long-term probability of treatment success was approximately 40%. This probability was increased after donor lymphocyte infusion. Our multi-state model helps to interpret the impact of post-transplantation interventions and clinical events on failure and treatment success, thus extracting more information from observational data.

New strategies of DLI in the management of relapse of hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

DLI is an effective strategy for patients with recurrent hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT). DLI has been widely applied to boost the graft vs tumor (GVT) or GVL effects. However, given the potentially severe complications associated with conventional DLI and transient GVL effect, new strategies for DLI are emerging. In this review, we have discussed the recent important studies on DLI as a prophylactic or therapeutic modality for relapsed hematological disorders after allo-HSCT. The strategies to separate GVL from GVHD have also been discussed. Leukemia-targeting therapy and lymphodepletion combined with DLI, and prophylactic DLI after allo-HSCT are often employed for patients with high risk of relapse, which has been reviewed as well. In addition, we have also discussed the issues on DLI to be further addressed, such as the doses, timing and frequency of DLI in different clinical settings, leukemic antigen-specific DLI as well as how to augment GVL effect while attenuating GVHD.

Allo-reactive T cells for the treatment of hematological malignancies

Several mechanisms can be responsible for control of hematological tumors by allo-reactive T cells. Following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) donor T cells recognizing genetic disparities presented on recipient cells and not on donor cells are main effectors of tumor control, but also of the detrimental graft versus host disease (GVHD). Since after transplantation normal hematopoiesis is of donor origin, any T cell response directed against polymorphic antigens expressed on hematopoietic recipient cells but not on donor cells will result in an anti-tumor response not affecting normal hematopoiesis. After fully HLA-matched alloSCT, T cells recognizing polymorphic peptides derived from proteins encoded by genes selectively expressed in hematopoietic lineages may result in anti-tumor responses without GVHD. Due to the high susceptibility of hematopoietic cells for T cell recognition, a low amplitude of the overall T cell response may also be in favor of the anti-tumor reactivity in hematological malignancies. A mismatch between donor and patient for specific HLA-alleles can also be exploited to induce a selective T cell response against patient (malignant) hematopoietic cells. If restricting HLA class II molecules are selectively expressed on hematopoietic cells under non-inflammatory circumstances, allo HLA class-II responses may control the tumor with limited risk of GVHD. Alternatively, T cells recognizing hematopoiesis-restricted antigens presented in the context of mismatched HLA alleles may be used to treat patients with hematological cancers. This review discusses various ways to manipulate the allo-immune response aiming to exploit the powerful ability of allo-reactive T-cells to control the malignancies without causing severe damage to non-hematopoietic tissues.

Orchestrating an immune response against cancer with engineered immune cells expressing αβTCRs, CARs, and innate immune receptors: an immunological and regulatory challenge

Over half a century ago, the first allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) initiated cellular immunotherapy. For several decades, little progress was made, and toxicity of allo-SCT remained a major challenge. However, recent breakthroughs have opened new avenues to further develop this modality and to provide less toxic and equally efficient interventions for patients suffering from hematological or solid malignancies. Current novel cellular immune interventions include ex vivo expansion and adoptive transfer of tumor-infiltrating immune cells or administration of drugs which antagonize tolerizing mechanisms. Alternatively, transfer of immune cells engineered to express defined T cell receptors (TCRs) and chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has shown its potential. A valuable addition to ‘engineered’ adaptive immunity has emerged recently through the improved understanding of how innate immune cells can attack cancer cells without substantial side effects. This has enabled the development of transplantation platforms with limited side effects allowing early immune interventions as well as the design of engineered immune cells expressing innate immune receptors. Here, we focus on innate immune interventions and their orchestration with TCR- and CAR-engineered immune cells. In addition, we discuss how the exploitation of the full potential of cellular immune interventions is influenced by regulatory frameworks. Finally, we highlight and discuss substantial differences in the current landscape of clinical trials in Europe as compared to the USA. The aim is to stimulate international efforts to support regulatory authorities and funding agencies, especially in Europe, to create an environment that will endorse the development of engineered immune cells for the benefit of patients.

Donor lymphocyte infusions to leukemic bone lesions are therapeutically effective in a Ph+ ALL patient with post-HSCT relapse

A Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) case was maintained in remission with the use of chemo-immunotherapy. The latter involved sibling bone marrow transplant (BMT) (three procedures) followed by intravenous (IV) donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The third relapse responded to routine chemotherapy and again DLI was employed. During hematological and molecular remission verified at the level of iliac crest aspiration, extra-medullary relapse in the bones was apparent. A novel procedure of donor lymphocyte injection to the bone leukemic lesions was developed and employed. A dose of 10(6) donor lymphocytes/kg body weight (BW) of the recipient were each time injected to the plane of the right and left tibia, the head of the humerus, and the calcaneus, which resulted in healing of the destructive process. In consequence of this novel approach, in addition to the healing of bone lesions, an accumulation of cytotoxic activated T-cells in the marrow was documented, which was mirrored by an increase in the number of transcripts for interferon (IFN)-γ, interleukin (IL)-17, as well as RORγt. The local administration of DLI directly to the leukemic lesions requires a lower dose that diminishes the toxicity due to the general immune system activation.