1
|
Age does not adversely influence outcomes among patients older than 60 years who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant for AML and myelodysplastic syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant 2017; 52:1530-1536. [PMID: 28869613 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2017.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 07/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) outcomes data of older AML/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients are limited. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients ⩾60 years old with AML/MDS who underwent AHSCT between January 2005 and December 2014. The primary objectives were to determine nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 year post AHSCT. A total of 159 patients underwent AHSCT with a median age of 64 (range, 60-75) years. Of these, 103 patients (65%) had AML and 56 patients (35%) had MDS. At 1 year post AHSCT, grade III-IV acute GvHD and chronic GvHD occurred in 20.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 14.9-27.5%) and 54.1% (95% CI, 46.0-61.5%) of patients, respectively. NRM, RFS, relapse rate and OS at 1 year post AHSCT were 25.3% (95% CI, 18.8-32.3%), 53.3% (95% CI, 46.1-61.7%), 21.4% (95% CI, 15.4-28.1%) and 56.4% (95% CI, 49.2-54.7%), respectively. High disease risk index was associated with poor RFS, OS and higher relapse rate (P<0.03), whereas non-thymoglobulin-based GvHD prophylaxis, higher comorbidity index (⩾3) and MDS were associated with higher NRM (P<0.03). Importantly, age did not have an adverse effect on NRM, relapse, RFS and OS. AHSCT was well tolerated. Hence, older age alone should not be considered a contraindication to AHSCT.
Collapse
|
2
|
Clotrimazole troches induce supratherapeutic blood levels of sirolimus and tacrolimus in an allogeneic hematopoietic cell-transplant recipient resulting in acute kidney injury. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 2016; 9:157-161. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2015.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 10/31/2015] [Accepted: 11/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
3
|
Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Parody R, Perkins J, Lopez-Godino O, Lopez-Corral L, Vazquez L, Caballero D, Falantes J, Shapiro J, Ortí G, Barba P, Valcárcel D, Esquirol A, Martino R, Piñana JL, Solano C, Tsalatsanis A, Pidala J, Anasetti C, Perez-Simón JA. Tacrolimus plus sirolimus with or without ATG as GVHD prophylaxis in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016; 52:438-444. [PMID: 27819684 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2016.269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2016] [Revised: 08/23/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
HLA-matched related or unrelated donors are not universally available. Consequently, patients can be offered hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from alternative donors, including mismatched unrelated donors (MMURD), known to cause a higher incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD. In vivo T-cell-depletion strategies, such as antithymocyte globulin (ATG) therapy, significantly decrease the risk of GVHD. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study comparing tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SIR) with or without ATG in 104 patients (TAC-SIR=45, TAC-SIR-ATG=59) who underwent MMURD HSCT. Use of ATG was associated with a lower incidence, albeit not statistically significant, of grades 2-4 aGVHD (46% vs 64%, P=0.09), no difference in grades 3-4 aGVHD (10% vs 15%, P=0.43), a trend for a lower incidence of moderate/severe chronic GVHD (16% vs 37%, P=0.09) and more frequent Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (54% vs 18%, P=0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year overall survival (OS) (TAC-SIR-ATG=40% (95% confidence interval (CI)=24-56%) vs TAC-SIR=54% (95% CI=37-70%), P=0.43) or 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (TAC-SIR-ATG=40% (95% CI=28-58%) vs TAC-SIR=22% (95% CI=13-39%), P=0.92). An intermediate Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research disease risk resulted in a significantly lower non-relapse mortality and better OS at 3 years. Our study suggests that addition of ATG to TAC-SIR in MMURD HSCT does not affect OS when compared with TAC-SIR alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Kharfan-Dabaja
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - R Parody
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS)/CSIC, Sevilla, Spain
| | - J Perkins
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - L Vazquez
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - D Caballero
- Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - J Falantes
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS)/CSIC, Sevilla, Spain
| | - J Shapiro
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - G Ortí
- Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Barba
- Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Valcárcel
- Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Esquirol
- Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Martino
- Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J L Piñana
- Hospital Clínico de Valenci, Valencia, Spain
| | - C Solano
- Hospital Clínico de Valenci, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Tsalatsanis
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - J Pidala
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - C Anasetti
- Department of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - J A Perez-Simón
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS)/CSIC, Sevilla, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kekre N, Marquez-Malaver FJ, Cabrero M, Piñana J, Esquirol A, Soiffer RJ, Caballero D, Terol MJ, Martino R, Antin JH, Lopez-Corral L, Solano C, Armand P, Pérez-Simon JA. Fludarabine/Busulfan versus Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioning in Patients Undergoing Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22:1808-1815. [PMID: 27470290 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
There is at present little data to guide the choice of conditioning for patients with lymphoma undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In this study, we compared the outcomes of patients undergoing RIC SCT who received fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel), the standard RIC regimen used by the Spanish Group of Transplantation, and fludarabine and busulfan (FluBu), the standard RIC regimen used by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital. We analyzed 136 patients undergoing RIC SCT for lymphoma with either FluBu (n = 61) or FluMel (n = 75) conditioning between 2007 and 2014. Median follow-up was 36 months. The cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 13% with FluBu and 36% with FluMel (P = .002). The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 3.3% with FluBu and 31% with FluMel (P < .0001). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year was 29% with FluBu and 10% with FluMel (P = .08). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 47% with FluBu and 36% with FluMel (P = .24), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 62% with FluBu and 48% with FluMel (P = .01). In multivariable analysis, FluMel was associated with a higher risk of acute grades II to IV GVHD (HR, 7.45; 95% CI, 2.30 to 24.17; P = .001) and higher risk of NRM (HR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.36 to 17.44; P = .015). The type of conditioning was not significantly associated with relapse or disease-free survival in multivariable models. However, conditioning regimen was the only factor significantly associated with overall survival: FluMel conditioning was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 2.78 (95% CI, 1.23 to 6.27; P = .014) compared with FluBu. In conclusion, the use of FluBu as conditioning for patients undergoing SCT for lymphoma was associated with a lower risk of acute GVHD and NRM and improved overall survival when compared with FluMel in our retrospective study. These results confirm the differences between these RIC regimens in terms of toxicity and efficacy and support the need for comparative prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Kekre
- Division of Hematology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Francisco J Marquez-Malaver
- Department of Hematology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS)/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Monica Cabrero
- Hematology Department, University Hospital, Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jl Piñana
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Albert Esquirol
- Department of Clinical Hematology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Jose Carreras Leukemia Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robert J Soiffer
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dolores Caballero
- Hematology Department, University Hospital, Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - M J Terol
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Martino
- Department of Clinical Hematology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Jose Carreras Leukemia Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joseph H Antin
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - L Lopez-Corral
- Hematology Department, University Hospital, Instituto Biosanitario de Salamanca (IBSAL), University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Carlos Solano
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Philippe Armand
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jose A Pérez-Simon
- Department of Hematology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS)/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nishihori T, Al-Kadhimi Z, Hamadani M, Kharfan-Dabaja MA. Antithymocyte globulin in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: benefits and limitations. Immunotherapy 2016; 8:435-47. [DOI: 10.2217/imt.15.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Significant advances have been made in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation by reducing toxicities and optimizing its efficacy. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is an important in vivo T-cell depletion strategy, which reduces the risk of graft-versus-host disease in HLA-matched or -mismatched donor allografting. ATG effectively targets alloreactive T cells at the expense of potentially increasing the risk of post-hematopoietic cell transplantation infections and delayed immune reconstitution. We summarize the targets, mechanisms, various preparations of ATG, the growing role of ATG in prevention of graft-versus-host disease in various transplant modalities as well as emerging data on pharmacokinetic modeling for individualized ATG dosing. Further research is needed to optimize the ATG administration while minimizing the toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taiga Nishihori
- Department of Blood & Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, FOB-3, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center/University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja
- Department of Blood & Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, FOB-3, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, Moffitt Cancer Center/University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|