Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for severe aplastic anemia: similar long-term overall survival after transplantation with related donors compared to unrelated donors

Treatment of relapsed/refractory severe aplastic anemia in children: Evidence-based recommendations

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare potentially fatal hematologic disorder. Although overall outcomes with treatment are excellent, there are variations in management approach, including differences in treatment between adult and pediatric patients. Certain aspects of treatment are under active investigation in clinical trials. Because of the rarity of the disease, some pediatric hematologists may have relatively limited experience with the complex management of SAA. The following recommendations reflect an up-to-date evidence-based approach to the treatment of children with relapsed or refractory SAA.

Aplastic Anemia as a Roadmap for Bone Marrow Failure: An Overview and a Clinical Workflow

In recent years, it has become increasingly apparent that bone marrow (BM) failures and myeloid malignancy predisposition syndromes are characterized by a wide phenotypic spectrum and that these diseases must be considered in the differential diagnosis of children and adults with unexplained hematopoiesis defects. Clinically, hypocellular BM failure still represents a challenge in pathobiology-guided treatment. There are three fundamental topics that emerged from our review of the existing data. An exogenous stressor, an immune defect, and a constitutional genetic defect fuel a vicious cycle of hematopoietic stem cells, immune niches, and stroma compartments. A wide phenotypic spectrum exists for inherited and acquired BM failures and predispositions to myeloid malignancies. In order to effectively manage patients, it is crucial to establish the right diagnosis. New theragnostic windows can be revealed by exploring BM failure pathomechanisms.

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation for aplastic anemia: the current advances and future challenges

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative option for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Finding a suitable matched donor in a timely manner is a challenge. The availability of haploidentical donors and their successful use in transplantation have expanded valid choices for SAA. In recent decades, haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT) for the treatment of SAA has been continuously attempted, and great strides have been made. Nowadays, haplo-HSCT using different regimens has overcome the difficulty of graft failure and severe graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and achieved inspiring survival outcomes in SAA. The regimens consist mainly of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) plus antithymocyte globulin (ATG), posttransplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), and ex vivo graft T-cell depletion (TCD). In particular, the G-CSF and ATG-based regimen includes the largest sample size and the successful wide use of the G-CSF and ATG-based regimen has promoted haplo-HSCT a higher priority in SAA patients without matched related or unrelated donors in China. Recent studies have also indicated that haplo-HSCT using PT-Cy or TCD regimen is a practicable alternative, but the sample size is relatively small. Here, we offer an overview of clinical results obtained through the use of haploidentical transplantation in SAA, mainly focusing on current advances and future challenges.

Allo-HSCT compared with immunosuppressive therapy for acquired aplastic anemia: a system review and meta-analysis

Background

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and immunosuppressive therapy (IST) are two major competing treatment strategies for acquired aplastic anemia (AA). Whether allo-HSCT is superior to IST as a front-line treatment for patients with AA has been a subject of debate. To compare the efficacy and safety of allo-HSCT with that of IST as a front-line treatment for patients with AA, we performed a meta-analysis of available studies that examined the impact of the two major competing treatment strategies for AA.

Results

Fifteen studies including a total of 5336 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was 0.4 (95% CI 0.074–0.733, P = 0.016, I² = 58.8%) and the pooled HR for failure-free survival (FFS) was 1.962 (95% CI 1.43–2.493, P = 0.000, I² = 0%). The pooled relative risk (RR) for overall response rate (ORR) was 1.691 (95% CI 1.433–1.996, P = 0.000, I² = 11.6%).

Conclusion

Although survival was significantly longer among AA patients undergoing first-line allo-HSCT compared to those undergoing first-line IST, the selection of initial treatment for patients with newly diagnosed AA still requires comprehensive evaluation of donor availability, patient age, expected quality of life, risk of disease relapse or clonal evolution after IST, and potential use of adjunctive eltrombopag.

Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplants for Pediatric Severe Aplastic Anemia: Real-world Data comparing Matched Related and Unrelated Donors in a Developing Country. Retrospective study on behalf of the Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Working Group of the Brazilian Bone Marrow Transplantation Society (SBTMO) and the Brazil-Seattle Consortium (Gedeco)

In this study, we report on major MRD or URD BMT outcomes in pediatric patients with SAA in Brazil. This was a retrospective study, which included 106 patients ≤18 years old who received a first BMT for SAA. All patients received bone marrow as graft source from an MRD (n = 69) or a URD (n = 37). Conditioning regimen was non-myeloablative in 73.6% of cases, and GVHD prophylaxis comprised a calcineurin inhibitor plus methotrexate in 89.6% of patients. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years after BMT, 81 patients are alive, with a 4-year OS of 77% and no statistically significant difference between the MRD and URD groups (82% vs. 69%, respectively; P = .08). Grade III-IV aGVHD at 6 months and cGVHD at 2 years were observed in 8% and 14% of cases, respectively, and were not statistically different between the groups. Twenty-five (23%) patients died at a median of 2.9 months after BMT. Our study showed that 4-year OS after BMT was not statistically different between MRD and URD recipients. This study shows that the outcomes of pediatric patients transplanted for SAA with a URD in Brazil are approaching those of MRD transplants. In contrast, OS after MRD BMT was lower than we would expect based on previous reports. The wide range of preparatory regimens used by the study centers highlights the need for standardized protocols for these children. Our findings provide a benchmark for future studies focused on improving BMT outcomes in this setting in Brazil.

Effect of Stem Cell Source and Dose on Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with Idiopathic Aplastic Anemia: Data from the Korean Aplastic Anemia Trials

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effect of stem cell source and dose on the survival of various donor subgroups, such as matched sibling donor (MSDs) and alternative donors (ADs), upon bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) infusion in aplastic anemia (AA).

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the effects of stem cell source and dose on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in AA.

RESULTS

A total of 267 patients were included in this analysis. The BM-treated group showed an association with low incidence of any-grade acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) (p < 0.001). A higher stem cell dose was related with a low incidence of extensive chronic GvHD in MSDs (p = 0.025). Multivariate analysis for overall survival (OS) revealed that only age at alloHSCT <31 years (p = 0.010) and prior platelet transfusion <86 U (p = 0.046) in MSDs and higher stem cell dose (hazard ratio = 2.596, p = 0.045) in ADs were favorable prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

PBSCs could be preferred in AD because high stem cell dose may be easily achieved to improve the OS at the expense of acute GvHD. However, BM stem cells are preferred in MSDs.

Severe aplastic anemia: allogeneic bone marrow transplantation as first-line treatment

Treatment of severe aplastic anemia has improved significantly over the past 4 decades. This review will summarize the key areas of progress in the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation and nontransplant immunosuppressive therapy (IST) for the treatment of aplastic anemia and then summarize the recommendations for first-line treatment. Based on recent data, we argue that guidelines for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia require revision. At the time of diagnosis, before beginning treatment, HLA typing should be done to identify a marrow donor among family members or in the unrelated donor registries, and a marrow transplant should be considered first-line therapy. The priority order of donor source for bone marrow transplantation is: (1) HLA-identical sibling, (2) HLA-matched unrelated donor, and (3) HLA-haploidentical donor if an HLA-matched unrelated donor is not rapidly available. Each of these donor marrow sources may be preferable to nontransplant IST. We make this recommendation because of the long-term persistent risk for disease relapse and secondary myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia with the use of nontransplant IST for patients with aplastic anemia. In contrast, marrow transplantation is associated with high cure rates of aplastic anemia and a relatively low risk for graft-versus-host disease, with many patients now living for decades without the risk for disease recurrence or the development of clonal disorders. Implementation of this first-line treatment strategy will provide patients with severe aplastic anemia the best chance of long-term disease-free survival.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation for aplastic anemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Improvements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with better donor selection, conditioning regimens and graft vs. host disease prophylaxis make it reasonable to move HCT earlier in the algorithm for management of severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Recent progress in transplantation is reviewed whereas issues related to developing countries are also addressed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple research centers are reporting on clonality, mutations and telomere disorders in SAA, which may help to choose the most appropriate therapy upfront. Eltrombopag, in combination with immunosuppressive therapy (IST), has shown remarkable improvement over historical IST, and long-term follow-up is awaited. In younger patients and in experienced centers, matched unrelated-donor (MUD) and related haploidentical transplants (haplo-HCT) are being reported with survival approaching that seen with sibling transplants. Literature from resource-limited countries highlight the need to modify guidelines to make them affordable and cost-effective. Bone marrow remains the graft source of choice; peripheral blood stem cells may be acceptable in special circumstances in resource-constrained countries.

SUMMARY

The potential of novel research findings and new therapeutic trials should be maximized by validation in different centers, countries and patient populations to provide personalized care to patients with aplastic anemia.

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There has been a steady improvement in outcomes with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA), because of progress in optimization of the conditioning regimens, donor hematopoietic cell source, and supportive care. Here, we review recently published data that highlight the improvements and current issues in the treatment of SAA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approximately one-third of aplastic anemia patients treated with immune suppressive therapy (IST) have acquired mutations in myeloid cancer candidate genes. Because of the greater probability for eventual failure of IST, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor BMT is the first-line of treatment for SAA. HLA-matched unrelated donor (URD) BMT is generally recommended for patients who have failed IST. However, in younger patients for whom a 10/10-HLA-allele matched URD can be rapidly identified, there is a strong rationale to proceed with URD BMT as first-line therapy. HLA-haploidentical BMT using posttransplant cyclophosphamide conditioning regimens is now a reasonable second-line treatment for patients who failed IST.

SUMMARY

Improved outcomes have led to an increased first-line role of BMT for treatment of SAA. The optimal cell source from an HLA-matched donor is bone marrow. Additional studies are needed to determine the optimal conditioning regimen for HLA-haploidentical donors.