First report of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activities in the eastern mediterranean region from 1984 to 2011: on behalf of the pediatric cancer working committee of the eastern mediterranean blood and marrow transplantation group

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: Lessons learnt from a tertiary care center in India

There is paucity of data on outcomes of MSD-HSCT in children with relapsed or high-risk AML from developing countries, which have unique challenges including adverse host factors and resource constraints. We retrospectively reviewed records of children (age ≤ 18 years) who underwent MSD-HSCT for AML at our center from 2009 to 2019 to evaluate clinical outcome and its predictors using Cox proportional hazards model. There were 46 children (36 boys and 10 girls) with mean age 10.7 ± 4.8 years. Indication for HSCT was relapsed AML in CR2 (n = 37), primary refractory (n = 3), or relapsed refractory disease (n = 3); high-risk (n = 1) or secondary (n = 2) AML in CR1. Five-year EFS and OS were 33.3 ± 7.2% and 36.3 ± 7.6%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, CR1 duration less than 12 months, presence of active disease at transplant, and use of bone marrow stem cell graft were associated with poorer EFS and OS. There was one (2.2%) TRM, while disease relapse occurred in 20/40 patients who underwent HSCT in remission. Though the 5-year EFS and OS were inferior to results reported from high-income countries, relapse (and not TRM) was the major cause of treatment failure. A well-sustained CR1, achievement of disease remission, and use of peripheral blood allograft seem imperative to a successful transplant. Targeted therapy along with HSCT may be the option for those with early relapse.

Feasibility of high-dose chemotherapy protocols to treat infants with malignant central nervous system tumors: Experience from a middle-income country

BACKGROUND

Results of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) protocols for the management of malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumors in infants are mostly reported in high-income countries. We evaluated the feasibility and results of such protocols in a middle-income country (Jordan).

METHODS

A retrospective study of infants' charts with CNS tumors between 2006 and 2015 who were treated according to HeadStart (HS) protocols. Data included patients' demographics, chemotherapy complications, and cost.

RESULTS

We identified 18 patients with median age 29 months (range, 9-62 months) at diagnosis (12 HS-I and six HS-II). Distribution according to pathology was: atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) (nine), primitive neuoroectodermal tumors (PNET)/pineoblastoma (five), and medulloblastoma (four). Six patients (33%) had metastatic disease, and 14 (78%) had an incomplete resection. Eleven patients achieved partial or complete remission, two stabilized, and five progressed. Ten patients did not proceed to HDCT due to progression (five), financial reasons (two), failure to collect stem cells (one), and undocumented reasons (two). Seventy-eight chemotherapy cycles were administered (median interval 26 days). Main complications during induction and consolidation were febrile neutropenia (73% and 100%), documented infections (8% and 13%), and mucositis (12% and 88%), respectively. Three patients developed moderate hearing loss. No protocol-related mortality was reported. At the last follow-up, five patients were alive: three with medulloblastoma (19, 29, and 89 months) and two with ATRT (18 and 42 months). Three survivors received focal/craniospinal radiation. The median cost of a complete HS protocol, excluding surgery/radiotherapy, was $103 500 per patient; 39% of the median cost was related to pharmacy expenses.

CONCLUSIONS

These protocols were manageable in our context of limited health care resources. However, considering the significant costs and the modest survival rate, better selection criteria need to be used to identify patients likely to benefit from this approach.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Bioethical Lens

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is one of a range of therapeutic options available to patients suffering from various diseases. HSCT procedure involves important ethical and legal aspects that can occur at every phase of the procedure: the clinical choice of whether to perform the procedure, pretransplantation preparation regimens, donor selection, stem cell harvest procedure, transplantation phase, and short-term and long-term follow-up care. In this discussion paper, we outline the ethical issue-facing physicians involved in HSCT. Currently, HSCT is a widely accepted treatment for many life-threatening diseases. It thus represents a real therapeutic hope for many patients. It does, however, carry a burden of possible morbidity and mortality. Consequently, there are substantial information and communication issues involved in the consent process for HSCT. In the final decision, the judgements of different parties, such as patients, family members, and healthcare professionals, intersect and overlap and this is particularly true when the patient is a minor. Finally, HSCT is a very expensive procedure. The social and economic concerns of HSCT are discussed within the actual contextual framework of the dramatic increase in healthcare costs and inequalities in healthcare in relation to socioeconomic status, educational status, and ethnicity.