Single-agent GvHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus after post-transplant high-dose cyclophosphamide is a valid option for haploidentical transplantation in adults with hematological malignancies

Comparison of Three Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis Strategies after T Cell-Replete Haploidentical Hematopoietic Transplantation: Tacrolimus versus Calcineurin Inhibitors + Mycophenolate Mofetil versus Sirolimus + Mycophenolate Mofetil

Since the introduction of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy), haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has become a real alternative for patients who lack other eligible donors. The standard graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after PTCy has been a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (up to day +35), but promising results with sirolimus (with or without MMF) and single-agent tacrolimus have been published recently. This multicenter retrospective study compared the outcomes of 372 adult haploSCT recipients who received conditioning with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF), PTCy, and additional GVHD prophylaxis with 1 of 3 strategies: cohort A, single-agent tacrolimus (n = 222); cohort B, CNI + MMF (n = 49); or cohort C, sirolimus + MMF (n = 101). No differences among the 3 cohorts were found in terms of grade II-IV acute GVHD (20% in cohort A, 25% in cohort B, and 30% in cohort C) or grade III-IV acute GVHD (9%, 6%, and 15%, respectively) at 100 days; however, cohort A had the lowest incidence of overall chronic GVHD (24%, 47%, and 52%, respectively; P = .001) and moderate-severe chronic GVHD (13%, 35%, and 33%, respectively; P = .001). There were no differences in 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse among the 3 cohorts. Overall, our study suggests that single-agent tacrolimus, CNI + MMF, and sirolimus + MMF GVHD prophylaxis lead to similar outcomes following haploSCT with TBF and PTCy, with a low incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD, although possible differences in chronic GVHD require further investigation.

Outcome improvement over time in reduced intensity conditioning hematopoietic transplantation: a 20-year experience

The current study includes all consecutive patients (N = 484) who received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in our center from 1999 to 2020. Conditioning regimens were based on fludarabine with melphalan or busulfan, with low-dose thiotepa and pharmacological GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine A (CsA)-methotrexate (MTX)/mofetil (MMF) (n = 271), tacrolimus-sirolimus (n = 145), and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-tacrolimus (n = 68). The median time of overall follow-up in survivors was 8 years (1-22 years) and was at least 3 years in all three GVHD prophylaxis groups. Thirty-three percent had a high or very high disease risk index, 56% ≥ 4 European bone marrow transplantation risk, and 65% ≥ 3 hematopoietic stem cell transplantation comorbidity index score-age score. Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was longer for PTCy-tacro (p 0.0001). Cumulative incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was 17% at 200 days, and that of moderate-severe cGvHD was 36% at 8 years. GVHD prophylaxis was the only prognostic factor in the multivariable analyses for the development of aGVHD and moderate-severe cGVHD (p 0.0001). NRM and relapse incidences were 29% and 30% at 8 years, while OS and PFS rates were 43% and 39% at 8 years. At 3 years, OS was highest in the PTCy-tacro group (68%) than in the tacro-siro (61%) and CsA-MTX/MMF (49%) cohorts (p < 0.01). In the three groups, respectively, the 200-day incidence of grade III-IV aGvHD (6% vs. 12% vs. 23%) and 3-year moderate-severe cGVHD (8% vs. 40% vs. 38%) were lower in the PTCy cohort. These better outcomes were confirmed in multivariable analyses. Based on our recent results, the PTCy could be considered as a real GvHD prophylaxis in the RIC setting due to improve best 3-year GvHD and survival outcomes.

A Clinical Review of the Different Strategies to Minimize Hemorrhagic Cystitis Associated with the Use of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide in an Allogeneic Transplant

Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has improved hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes for patients with major HLA disparities. Although PTCy in combination with calcineurin inhibitors is a successful graft-versus-host disease regimen, giving high doses of cyclophosphamide may cause hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). The strategies used to prevent HC are adapted from published data in the pre-transplantation conditioning setting. However, there is no consensus on what the optimal strategy is to prevent PTCy-associated HC. This review provides a summary of the different preventative strategies used in this setting. Based on the results published in current literature, hyperhydration is an effective preventative strategy, but it may cause fluid overload and other complications. Additionally, mesna at least 100% of the PTCy dose should be administered as a continuous infusion or frequent intermittent bolus infusion. More comparative studies between these strategies are needed to provide a definitive solution for preventing HC associated with PTCy.

Severe infections and infection-related mortality in a large series of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with post-transplant cyclophosphamide

Severe infections and their attributable mortality are major complications in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). We herein report 236 adult patients who received haploSCT with PTCy. The median follow-up for survivors was 37 months. The overall incidence of bloodstream infections by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria at 37 months was 51% and 46%, respectively. The incidence of cytomegalovirus infection was 69%, while Epstein Barr virus infections occurred in 10% of patients and hemorrhagic cystitis in 35% of cases. Invasive fungal infections occurred in 11% at 17 months. The 3-year incidence of infection-related mortality was 19%. The median interval from transplant to IRM was 3 months (range 1-30), 53% of IRM occurred >100 days post-haploSCT. Risk factors for IRM included age >50 years, lymphoid malignancy, and developing grade III-IV acute GvHD. Bacterial infections were the most common causes of IRM (51%), mainly due to gram-negative bacilli BSI. In conclusion, severe infections are the most common causes of NRM after haploSCT with PTCy, with a reemergence of gram-negative bacilli as the most lethal pathogens. More studies focusing on the severe infections after haploSCT with PTCy and differences with other types of alloSCT in adults are clearly warranted.

Combining Three Different Pretransplantation Scores Improves Predictive Value in Patients after Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation with Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Fludarabine Conditioning and Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide

One hundred and sixty-one patients underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) with thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine conditioning followed by post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) (on days +3 and +4) and tacrolimus as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Forty-two percent of patients had a high or very high revised Disease Risk Index (rDRI), 55% had an European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation risk score (EBMT-RS) ≥4, and 36% had an age-adjusted Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI-age) score ≥3. Each of these was considered an unfavorable score. Using the pretransplantation unfavorable scores that had an independent impact on each transplantation outcome studied in multivariate analysis allowed for better stratification of patient outcomes. Thus, the 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 unfavorable scores was 86%, 56%, 36%, and 24%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was negatively impacted by the EBMT-RS and the HCT-CI-age score (3-year NRM in patients with 0, 1, and 2 unfavorable scores was 12%, 33%, and 43%, respectively), whereas the EBMT-RS and the rDRI had an impact on the 3-year relapse incidence (8%, 18%, and 41% in patients with 0, 1, and 2 unfavorable scores, respectively). In conclusion, our study shows that combining 2 or 3 of these well-defined pretransplantation scores improves the ability to predict transplantation outcomes in the setting of haploSCT with PTCy.

Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide, Tacrolimus and Low-Dose ATG as GVHD Prophylaxis for Allogeneic Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Patients With Lymphoid Malignancies: A Single Arm Phase II Study

The PT-Cy was considered as one of the mainstay protocol for graft verus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Recent study demonstrated that PT-Cy combined with other immunosuppressants could further reduce the incidence of GVHD and improve the GVHD and relapse free survival (GRFS). In this prospective phase II study, we evaluated the effect of a new GVHD prophylaxis consist of PT-Cy combined with tacrolimus and low dose anti-thymoglobulin (ATG). A total of 23 patients were enrolled including 20 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and three patients with T cell lymphoma. The median age was 29 years (range, 16~58 years). Patients with HLA-matched related donor (MSD, n=7) received PT-Cy combined with tacrolimus, while patients with HLA matched unrelated (MUD, n = 2) or haplo-identical (Haplo, n = 14) donor received additional ATG at 2.5 mg/kg on day 15 or day 22 after engraftment of neutrophils. As to the acute GVHD (aGVHD), only three patients developed grade I (n = 1) or grade II (n = 2) aGVHD with 100-day incidence of all aGVHD and II-IV aGVHD at 13.0 ± 5.1% and 9.1 ± 6.1% respectively. Only two patients had mild and one had moderate chronic GVHD (cGVHD), with 1-year incidence of cGVHD and moderate/severe cGVHD at 15.2 ± 8.7% and 4.6 ± 4.4% respectively. A high incidence of CMV reactivation was documented (14/16 with MUD/Haplo donor and 2/7 with MSD) with only 1 CMV disease documented. There were two EBV reactivation without post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) documented. With a median follow-up of 303 days (range, 75~700 days), three patients relapsed leading to 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) at 12.8 ± 9.2%. Only one patient died of CMV pneumonia on day 91 with both 100-day and 1-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 4.6 ± 4.4%. The 1-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS) and GRFS were 95.5 ± 4.4%, 82.6 ± 9.5%, and 68.0 ± 11.3% respectively. Based on Simon's stage II design, our primary data showed that the PT-Cy+tacrolimus ± ATG protocol was promising in preventing aGVHD and cGVHD, which may translate into low NRM without increased CIR. Further clinical trial with large number of patients should be warranted. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04118075.

Evolution of the role of haploidentical stem cell transplantation: past, present, and future

INTRODUCTION

The accessibility to haplo-donors has led to an increase in the number of haplo-HSCT worldwide. A systematic search of the PubMed database between 2000 to present was performed.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discussed the most used approaches to perform haplo-HSCT and its results: T-cell depletion (TCD, including Perugia platform and its modifications) and T-cell repleted haplo (TCR, including the high-dose post-transplant cyclophosphamide strategy (Baltimore protocol) and the Beijing protocol). The improvements and modifications made to the different strategies have increased the indications of haplo-HSCT, including both malignant and nonmalignant disorders. Focusing on the Baltimore protocol, the authors review the results of the retrospective studies that have compared it to other donor transplants. The limitations of this strategy in terms of toxicity, graft complications, and GVHD are also discussed in detail. Finally, possible approaches to improve the outcomes of TCR haplo-HSCT are presented.

EXPERT OPINION

The recent advances in the field of haplo-HSCT have allowed a large number of patients with incurable diseases to benefit from this procedure despite not having a matched donor. With all available strategies, virtually no patient who needs an allogeneic transplant should be excluded by the absence of a donor.

Feasibility of thiotepa addition to the fludarabine-busulfan conditioning with tacrolimus/sirolimus as graft vs host disease prophylaxis

In classical reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens, including the fludarabine and busulphan (BF) combination, sirolimus and tacrolimus (SIR-TAC) as graft vs host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has shown acceptable results. The outcomes of SIR-TAC in a more intense RIC regimen as Thiotepa-fludarabine-busulfan (TBF) have been hardly investigated. This retrospective study included all consecutive patients receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloid malignancies (January 2009-2017) conditioned with either TBF or BF and receiving SIR-TAC. Patients receiving TBF presented higher non-relapse mortality (31.6 vs 12.3%, p = .01), along with shorter overall survival (51.8% vs 77.8%, p < .01) at 2 years than patients treated with BF. There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD or moderate-severe chronic GVHD or relapse between both groups. These results suggest that TBF does not seem to improve the traditional RIC BF regimen, at least when associated with SIR-TAC prophylaxis.

Haploidentical transplantation in high-risk pediatric leukemia: A retrospective comparative analysis on behalf of the Spanish working Group for bone marrow transplantation in children (GETMON) and the Spanish Grupo for hematopoietic transplantation (GETH)

A total of 192 pediatric patients, median age 8.6 years, with high-risk hematological malignancies, underwent haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy), or ex vivo T cell-depleted (TCD) graft platforms, from January 1999 to December 2016 in 10 centers in Spain. Some 41 patients received an unmanipulated graft followed by PT-Cy for graft-vs-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. A total of 151 patients were transplanted with CD3-depleted peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) by either CD34⁺ selection, CD3⁺ CD19⁺ depletion, TCRαβ⁺ CD19⁺ depletion or CD45RA⁺ depletion, added to CD34⁺ selection for GvHD prophylaxis. The PBSCs were the only source in patients following ex vivo TCD haplo-HSCT; bone marrow was the source in 9 of 41 patients following PT-CY haplo-HSCT. Engraftment was achieved in 91.3% of cases. A donor younger than 30 years, and the development of chronic GvHD were positive factors influencing survival, whereas positive minimal residual disease (MRD) before transplant and lymphoid disease were negative factors. The probability of relapse increased with lymphoid malignancies, a donor killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) haplotype A and positive MRD pretransplant. No difference was found in overall survival, disease-free survival or relapse incidence between the two platforms. Relapse is still of concern in both platforms, and it should be the focus of future efforts. In conclusion, both platforms for haplo-HSCT were effective and could be utilized depending on the comfort level of the center.

HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide

HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide has spread rapidly worldwide. This strategy was initially developed in the setting of bone marrow transplantation following nonmyeloablative conditioning. Recently, peripheral blood stem cell grafts and/or myeloablative conditioning regimen have been widely used. In Japan, prospective, multicenter, phase II studies have been conducted by the Japan Study Group for Cell Therapy and Transplantation to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HLA-haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haploPBSCT). In the first such study (JSCT Haplo 13 study), we demonstrated that PTCy-haploPBSCT after busulfan-based reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) enables stable donor engraftment and low incidences of both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In the second (JSCT Haplo 14 study), we showed that both myeloablative conditioning (MAC) and RIC are valid options for PTCy-haploPBSCT. Emerging evidence, including our findings, suggests that donor type (HLA-haploidentical donor versus HLA-matched related or unrelated donor) may no longer be a significant predictor of transplant outcome.