The effect of various dose regimens of famotidine on basal nocturnal and meal-stimulated gastric secretion

Differences in basal nocturnal, meal-stimulated, and pentagastrin-stimulated gastric secretion values in a sample of healthy volunteers in basal conditions and under ranitidine influence

The gastric secretion values from 16 healthy male volunteers are reported. A nasogastric tube was positioned in the gastric antrum and 10-min gastric secretion samples were obtained hourly by continuous suction. Basal nocturnal, meal-stimulated, and pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion were measured. Experimental sessions were carried out in control conditions and repeated after a 7-day treatment with placebo and ranitidine (150 mg b.i.d.) in a double-blind procedure. We found six subjects (group I) with basal nocturnal, meal-stimulated, and pentagastrin-stimulated gastric secretion values statistically lower than then rest of the group (group II). Basal nocturnal secretion mean values were 3.99 +/- 6.6 mmol/L (group I) and 59.2 +/- 22.1 mmol/L (group II) (p < 0.01). Meal-stimulated gastric acidity mean values were 33.1 + 17.3 mmol/L (group I) and 65.6 +/- 30.6 mmol/L (group II) (p < 0.05). Pentagastrin-stimulated gastric secretion mean values were 8 +/- 2 mmol/h (group I) and 19.2 +/- 2.7 mmol/h (group II) (p < 0.01). Ranitidine significantly inhibited basal nocturnal, meal-stimulated, and pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acidity values mostly in group II. These results suggest that there are two different patterns of gastric secretion in the healthy male population.

Novel oral medication delivery system for famotidine

A famotidine wafer that rapidly disperses on the tongue without water is a novel alternative to other histamine2 (H2)-antagonist dosage forms. Benefits associated with such a dosage form include convenience and potentially improved compliance for patients who dislike or have difficulty taking tablets and capsules. This report describes the research of three studies on the famotidine wafer dosage form. In the first trial, the bioequivalence and tolerability of the new 40-mg famotidine wafer and the marketed 40-mg famotidine tablet were studied in a 2-period crossover study (n = 18). The two formulations were bioequivalent as assessed by area under the plasma concentration versus time curve and maximum plasma concentration of famotidine. The plasma concentration of famotidine associated with 50% inhibition of pentagastrin stimulated gastric acid secretion (EC50; 10 ng/mL) was attained on average within 0.5 hours post-dose for the wafer and tablet. In a second trial, the tolerability of the famotidine 20-mg and 40-mg wafers or placebo given twice daily (bid) for 14 days were evaluated (n = 192). Both wafer strengths were well and equally tolerated. In a third trial of 450 subjects, the 40-mg wafer was preferred over tablets by 75% of the subjects, when they were asked to consider the method of administration and flavor. When used as an alternative to tablets and other conventional dosage forms, the wafers have the potential therapeutic benefit of improved compliance. It is concluded that similar systemic exposure, excellent tolerability, palatability, and preference make the famotidine wafer a clinically acceptable and convenient dosage from for patients on H2-antagonist therapy.

Absorption of oral mesalazine-containing preparations and the influence of famotidine on the absorption

The mesalazine-containing preparations Asacol, Pentasa, and Salofalk (=Claversal) are frequently used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The release patterns of these formulations are time- and/or pH-dependent. The aim of this study was to investigate the patterns of absorption of these preparations and the influence of raised intragastric pH on absorption. Gastric pH was raised by simultaneous administration of famotidine. Absorption was determined by assaying with a high-performance liquid chromatography method the urinary excretion of acetylmesalazine, the major metabolite of mesalazine. A large intra- and inter-individual variability in absorption was found for all three formulations, both with and without concomitant famotidine administration. Asacol and Pentasa were significantly less absorbed than Salofalk. A significant lower absorption of mesalazine was seen when Asacol was combined with famotidine. Variations in gastric pH have negligible effect on the bioavailability of mesalazine in vivo.

Famotidine. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in peptic ulcer disease and other allied diseases

Famotidine is a highly selective histamine H2-receptor antagonist. In healthy volunteers and patients with acid hypersecretory disease it is approximately 20 to 50 times more potent at inhibiting gastric acid secretion than cimetidine and 8 times more potent than ranitidine on a weight basis. As shown in placebo-controlled trials, famotidine is effective in healing both duodenal and gastric ulcers. Famotidine 20mg twice daily or 40mg at bedtime achieves healing rates and symptom relief similar or superior to those achieved by cimetidine 800mg daily or ranitidine 300mg daily in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Results of 1 placebo-controlled study suggest that famotidine prevents recurrence of duodenal ulcer, but comparative trials are needed to establish its relative efficacy in maintenance therapy. The few non-comparative trials conducted to date also suggest that famotidine 10 to 20mg twice daily may be effective in the treatment of gastritis and reflux gastro-oesophagitis. In comparative trials, famotidine was similar in efficacy to cimetidine in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and to ranitidine in the prevention of pulmonary aspiration of acid. In patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, the potency and long duration of action of famotidine may confer an advantage over other H2-receptor antagonists--in individualised doses (mean 0.33 g/day) famotidine successfully controlled acid secretion for up to 72 months in 1 study of such patients. Accumulated clinical evidence confirms that famotidine is very well tolerated and is free of the antiandrogenic effects infrequently reported with cimetidine. Moreover, famotidine is not associated with altered hepatic metabolism of drugs. Thus, famotidine is an effective, well-tolerated alternative to cimetidine and ranitidine. Famotidine is also promising as maintenance therapy for preventing recurrence of duodenal ulcer and as initial or maintenance treatment of gastric hypersecretory disorders, but further clinical experience, particularly in the long term, is needed to define the relative efficacy and tolerability of famotidine in these indications.

Single night-time doses of 40 mg famotidine or 800 mg cimetidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcer

Famotidine (40 mg) and 800 mg cimetidine as single night-time doses were compared in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre study of acute treatment for duodenal ulceration. Fifteen centres recruited 304 patients into the study. Of these, 274 were included for analysis, with 136 receiving famotidine and 138 receiving cimetidine. After 4 weeks, 75% of the patients who received famotidine and 77% of the patients who received cimetidine were healed. At 6 weeks the cumulative healing rates were 91% with famotidine and 87% with cimetidine. Differences between the groups were not significant at 4 or 6 weeks. No significant difference in healing rates between smokers and non-smokers was found. Day and night pain resolved rapidly in both groups. Both treatments were well-tolerated; adverse events were reported in 17 patients on famotidine and 18 on cimetidine, with headache the most frequent event in both groups. Famotidine is effective and well-tolerated in the short-term treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists

The first histamine H2-receptor antagonists were developed in the early 1970s, and they have a dominant role in today's management of peptic ulceration. The original regimens using either cimetidine or ranitidine attempted to control acidity across the 24 hours, but more 'modern' regimens use a large single dose of the H2-blocker in the evening, which produces a pulse of decreased intragastric acidity during the night with a normal acidity in the daytime. High-dose regimens using a new generation of extremely potent histamine H2-receptor antagonists may improve ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks, and may be particularly useful for the management of either severe oesophagitis or intractable duodenal ulceration.