Trial of oral physostigmine in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Respiratory function tests in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: The role of maximal voluntary ventilation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary function tests are routinely used to measure progression in ALS. This study aimed to assess the change of various respiratory tests, in particular maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), which evaluates respiratory endurance.

METHODS

A group of 51 patients were assessed 3 times (T1, T2, T3, separated by 5.4 months), including slow (SVC) and forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) pressures, MVV, and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP). In addition, body mass index (BMI), ALSFRS-R and phrenic nerve responses were obtained 4 times. Patients with dementia and marked bulbar involvement were excluded.

RESULTS

Mean ALSFRS-R was high at entry (42.9) and its decline was moderately slow at 0.4/month. FVC and FEV1 declined significantly in the three time frames analysed. MVV reduced significantly only between T1-T3 and SVC between T2-T3, and MIP, MEP, PEF and SNIP did not change significantly. The amplitude and the latency of the motor response of the phrenic nerve changed significantly, and BMI declined significantly in most time periods, and ALSFRS-R changed significantly in the 4 time periods. We found a strong correlation between MVV, and FVC, SVC, FEV1, SNIP, phrenic nerve amplitude/area (p < 0.001), and markedly with PEF (rho = 0.821) and ALSFRS-R (rho = 0.713).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study of early affected patients supports the use of a set of volitional and non-volitional respiratory tests to assess disease progression, rather than any single test. We found MVV a potentially useful marker of pulmonary function in ALS.

Pathophysiology and Treatment of Non-motor Dysfunction in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disease typically presenting with bulbar or limb weakness. There is increasing evidence that amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a multisystem disease with early and frequent impacts on cognition, behaviour, sleep, pain and fatigue. Dysfunction of normal physiological and metabolic processes also appears common. Evidence from pre-symptomatic studies and large epidemiological cohorts examining risk factors for the future development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis have reported a high prevalence of changes in behaviour and mental health before the emergence of motor weakness. This suggests that changes beyond the motor system are underway at an early stage with dysfunction across brain networks regulating a variety of cognitive, behavioural and other homeostatic processes. The full impact of non-motor dysfunction continues to be established but there is now sufficient evidence that the presence of non-motor symptoms impacts overall survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and with up to 80% reporting non-motor symptoms, there is an urgent need to develop more robust therapeutic approaches. This review provides a contemporary overview of the pathobiology of non-motor dysfunction, offering readers a practical approach with regard to assessment and management. We review the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of non-motor dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and highlight the need to further integrate non-motor dysfunction as an important outcome measure for future clinical trial design.

Nonmotor Symptoms in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

ALS is a progressive neurodegenerative disease with no curative treatment. Nonmotor symptoms presenting in ALS may cause significant distress, worsen prognosis, and affect survival.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review evidence for the prevalence of nonmotor ALS symptoms, and treatment options.

METHODS

Multiple medical literature databases were searched and studies screened using predefined inclusion criteria. Of 4580 studies, 44 were eligible for inclusion with 25 relating to treatment and 19 to the prevalence of nonmotor symptoms in ALS.

RESULTS

Nonmotor symptoms involve neuropsychiatric, autonomic, gastrointestinal, and vascular systems, and affect between 5% and 80% of people with ALS. Screening tools for individual nonmotor symptoms are useful in classifying symptom severity and to compare between treatment options. Several methods to relieve nonmotor symptoms have been trialed with varying success rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Many of the current studies of nonmotor symptoms in ALS have small sample sizes, requiring more evidence to increase precision in prevalence estimates. Further research is needed to assess the efficacy of current treatments and to find new therapies. Symptom relief or treatment of these nonmotor symptoms should therefore be considered during the clinical management of ALS.

Why is ALS so Difficult to Treat?

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is proving intractable. Difficulties in pre-clinical studies contribute in small measure to this futility, but the chief reason for failure is an inadequate understanding of disease pathogenesis. Many acquired and inherited processes have been advanced as potential causes of ALS but, while they may predispose to disease, it seems increasingly likely that none leads directly to ALS. Rather, two recent overlapping considerations, both involving aberrant protein homeostasis, may provide a better explanation for a common disease phenotype and a common terminal pathogenesis. If so, therapeutic approaches will need to be altered and carefully nuanced, since protein homeostasis is essential and highly conserved. Nonetheless, these considerations provide new optimism in a difficult disease which has hitherto defied treatment.

Treatment for cramps in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease

BACKGROUND

Cramps are painful, involuntary muscle contractions. They commonly affect people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease (ALS/MND) at all stages of the disease. To date, the treatment of muscle cramps in ALS has been largely empirical without any evidence from randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically assess the effect of interventions on muscle cramps as a primary or secondary endpoint or adverse event in people with ALS/MND.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (14 February 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1, 2011 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2011) and EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2011) and reference lists of articles searched using the terms motor neuron disease, motor neurone disease, motoneuron disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We contacted authors of trials for further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised and quasi-randomised trials of oral medications in people with ALS which assessed cramps as a primary or secondary outcome measure or as an adverse event. We also included trials using subcutaneous or intravenous medications or physical therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All authors applied the selection criteria and assessed study quality independently, and all authors performed independent data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty studies including 4789 participants were identified. Only one trial, of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), assessed cramps as the primary endpoint. Thirteen studies assessed cramps as a secondary endpoint. The medications comprised vitamin E, baclofen, riluzole, L-threonine, xaliproden, indinavir, and memantine. Six studies assessed cramps as an adverse event. The medications comprised creatine, gabapentin, dextromethorphan, quinidine, and lithium. In all 20 studies no favourable effect for the treatment of cramps in ALS/MND could be demonstrated, but many studies were underpowered to draw a definite conclusion. A meta-analysis of two small studies showed a statistically nonsignificant result for the amino acid L-threonine for the treatment of cramps in ALS/MND. No study was identified using physical therapy as a therapeutic intervention for cramps.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to support the use of any intervention for muscle cramps in ALS/MND. More and larger randomised controlled trials evaluating treatments for muscle cramps in ALS/MND are needed.

A survey of clinicians' practice in the symptomatic treatment of ALS

Symptomatic management is the mainstay of ALS patient care, but there are few controlled trials of drugs and interventions for common symptoms.

METHODS

We queried ALS clinic neurologists to determine drugs and interventions of choice and neurologists' perceived efficacy for 14 symptoms.

RESULTS

The results are tabulations of the physicians' four most frequent choices for each symptom, the physicians' perception of efficacy, the average doses and average daily costs. A wide range of drugs and interventions were nominated for management of ALS symptoms. Consensus on treatment was rare for individual symptoms, and efficacy for any symptom was judged moderate at best. A few drugs were recommended for multiple symptoms. Comparisons of perceived efficacy compared to drug costs are informative.

DISCUSSION

The results of the survey emphasize the challenges of symptom management in ALS. These data aid clinical management and guide rational choices for randomized controlled trials.

Treatment for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease

BACKGROUND

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also known as motor neuron disease (MND), is a rare neurodegenerative disease. Approximately 5% to 7% of ALS/MND patients report a family history of a similarly affected relative. Superoxide dismutase-1 gene mutations are the cause in about 20% of familial cases. In those with non-familial (sporadic) ALS/MND the cause is unknown. Also unknown is whether patients with familial and sporadic ALS/MND respond differently to treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the literature and to answer the specific question: 'Is there a difference in the response to treatment between patients with sporadic and familial forms of ALS?'

SEARCH STRATEGY

In May 2006 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register, MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2006) and EMBASE (January 1980 to May 2006) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two review authors read the titles and abstracts of all articles and reviewed the full text of all possibly relevant articles. We scanned references of all included trials to identify additional relevant articles. For all trials eligible for inclusion we contacted the authors to request the necessary raw data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies had to meet two criteria: (a) randomized controlled study design, and (b) inclusion of patients with both familial and sporadic ALS/MND.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We attempted to contact authors of all trials that met inclusion criteria. We obtained data regarding ALS/MND type (sporadic versus familial), treatment assignment (active versus placebo), survival and ALS Functional Rating Scale scores for four large RCTs that included 822 sporadic and 41 familial ALS patients. We could not obtain data from 25 potentially eligible studies (17 trial authors could not be contacted and eight were unwilling to provide data).

MAIN RESULTS

There was no statistical evidence for a different response to treatment in patients with familial ALS/MND compared to those with sporadic ALS/MND. The pooled estimate of the hazard ratio for the interaction term (treatment x familial ALS) suggested a more beneficial response with respect to survival among patients with familial ALS/MND, but the result was not statistically significant. Estimates of the rate of decline on the ALS Functional Rating Scale also suggested a slightly better response to treatment among those with familial ALS/MND, but the result was not statistically significant.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Future RCTs should document whether patients with familial ALS/MND are included and the presence or absence of a mutation in the superoxide dismutase-1 gene amongst those with familial ALS/MND.

Therapeutic developments in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

There is currently no effective treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a devastating disorder of the human nervous system that, due to motoneurone degeneration, causes progressive loss of muscle function and death. The relentless progression of ALS and the uniformly poor prognosis have been unhindered by a variety of therapeutic agents tested in previous clinical studies. Recently, two drugs, namely riluzole and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-1), have been reported to benefit patients with ALS by improving survival or slowing disease progression. Several other drugs, such as gabapentin and various neurotrophic factors, are being investigated in on-going clinical trials. Therapeutic developments in ALS have been hampered by the fact that the precise cause of the disease remains unknown. In addition, there are considerable variations in disease related characteristics among patients, rendering accurate measurements of disease progression difficult. Advances in theories of pathogenesis, such as genetic factors, glutamate excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, autoimmune mechanism and cytoskeletal abnormality will help guide the development of future therapies. Newer approaches to therapy may include suitable glutamate antagonists, small molecules that augment neurotrophic factor function, and anti-oxidants. Combination therapy of effective agents should be considered.

The basic aspects of therapeutics in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Once thought to be a single pathological disease state, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is now recognized to be the limited phenotypic expression of a complex, heterogeneous group of biological processes, resulting in an unrelenting loss of motor neurons. On average, individuals affected with the disease live <5 years. In this article, the complex nature of the pathogenesis of ALS, including features of age dependency, environmental associations, and genetics, is reviewed. Once held to be uncommon, it is now clear that ALS is associated with a frontotemporal dementia and that this process may reflect disturbances in the microtubule-associated tau protein metabolism. The motor neuron ultimately succumbs in a state where significant disruptions in neurofilament metabolism, mitochondrial function, and management of oxidative stress exist. The microenvironment of the neuron becomes a complex milieu in which high levels of glutamate provide a source of chronic excitatory neurotoxicity, and the contributions of activated microglial cells lead to further cascades of motor neuron death, perhaps serving to propagate the disease once established. The final process of motor neuron death encompasses many features of apoptosis, but it is clear that this alone cannot account for all features of motor neuron loss and that aspects of a necrosis-apoptosis continuum are at play. Designing pharmacological strategies to mitigate against this process thus becomes an increasingly complex issue, which is reviewed in this article.

Progress in clinical neurosciences: the evidence for ALS as a multisystems disorder of limited phenotypic expression

Traditionally, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is considered to be a unique neurodegeneration disorder in which motor neurons are selectively vulnerable to a single disease process. Our current understanding of ALS, however, suggests that this is far too limited an approach. While motor neuron degeneration remains the central component to this process, there is considerable phenotypic variability including broad ranges in survivorship and the presence or absence of cognitive impairment. The number of familial variants of ALS for which unique genetic linkage has been identified is increasing, attesting further to the biological heterogeneity of the disorder. At the cellular level, derangements in cytoskeletal protein and glutamate metabolism, mitochondrial function, and in glial interactions are clearly evident. When considered in this fashion, ALS can be justifiably considered a disorder of multiple biological processes sharing in common the degeneration of motor neurons.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

More than a century after its initial clinicopathologic description, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) remains a largely fatal, progressive neurodegenerative disorder for which few efficacious pharmacotherapies with an impact directly on the natural course of the illness exist. The only currently approved therapy, the antiglutamatergic agent riluzole, has been shown to have only a marginal survival benefit in the absence of changes in functional assessments during the disease course. The efficacy of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor (rhIGF-1) remains controversial. In light of this, the primary focus of treatment for individuals with ALS remains symptomatic, through a multidisciplinary team approach including physicians, nurses, speech/language pathologists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, dietitians, social workers, and respiratory therapists.

The role of plant-derived drugs and herbal medicines in healthcare

Many of our present medicines are derived directly or indirectly from higher plants. While several classic plant drugs have lost much ground to synthetic competitors, others have gained a new investigational or therapeutical status in recent years. In addition, a number of novel plant-derived substances have entered into Western drug markets. Clinical plant-based research has made particularly rewarding progress in the important fields of anticancer (e.g. taxoids and camptothecins) and antimalarial (e.g. artemisinin compounds) therapies. In addition to purified plant-derived drugs, there is an enormous market for crude herbal medicines. Natural product research can often be guided by ethnopharmacological knowledge, and it can make substantial contributions to drug innovation by providing novel chemical structures and/or mechanisms of action. In the end, however, both plant-derived drugs and crude herbal medicines have to take the same pharmacoeconomic hurdle that has become important for new synthetic pharmaceuticals.