Spontaneous or imposed circadian changes in plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil coadministered with folinic acid and oxaliplatin: relationship with mucosal toxicity in patients with cancer

Closed-loop automated drug infusion regulator: A clinically translatable, closed-loop drug delivery system for personalized drug dosing

BACKGROUND

Dosing of chemotherapies is often calculated according to the weight and/or height of the patient or equations derived from these, such as body surface area (BSA). Such calculations fail to capture intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variation, which can lead to order of magnitude variations in systemic chemotherapy levels and thus under- or overdosing of patients.

METHODS

We designed and developed a closed-loop drug delivery system that can dynamically adjust its infusion rate to the patient to reach and maintain the drug's target concentration, regardless of a patient's pharmacokinetics (PK).

FINDINGS

We demonstrate that closed-loop automated drug infusion regulator (CLAUDIA) can control the concentration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in rabbits according to a range of concentration-time profiles (which could be useful in chronomodulated chemotherapy) and over a range of PK conditions that mimic the PK variability observed clinically. In one set of experiments, BSA-based dosing resulted in a concentration 7 times above the target range, while CLAUDIA keeps the concentration of 5-FU in or near the targeted range. Further, we demonstrate that CLAUDIA is cost effective compared to BSA-based dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate that CLAUDIA could be rapidly translated to the clinic to enable physicians to control the plasma concentration of chemotherapy in their patients.

FUNDING

This work was supported by MIT's Karl van Tassel (1925) Career Development Professorship and Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Bridge Project, a partnership between the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT and the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center.

Personalized Chronomodulated 5-Fluorouracil Treatment: A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Precision Dosing Approach for Optimizing Cancer Therapy

The discovery of circadian clock genes greatly amplified the study of diurnal variations impacting cancer therapy, transforming it into a rapidly growing field of research. Especially, use of chronomodulated treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has gained significance. Studies indicate high interindividual variability (IIV) in diurnal variations in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity - a key enzyme for 5-FU metabolism. However, the influence of individual DPD chronotypes on chronomodulated therapy remains unclear and warrants further investigation. To optimize precision dosing of chronomodulated 5-FU, this study aims to: (i) build physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for 5-FU, uracil, and their metabolites, (ii) assess the impact of diurnal variation on DPD activity, (iii) estimate individual DPD chronotypes, and (iv) personalize chronomodulated 5-FU infusion rates based on a patient's DPD chronotype. Whole-body PBPK models were developed with PK-Sim(R) and MoBi(R). Sinusoidal functions were used to incorporate variations in enzyme activity and chronomodulated infusion rates as well as to estimate individual DPD chronotypes from DPYD mRNA expression or DPD enzymatic activity. Four whole-body PBPK models for 5-FU, uracil, and their metabolites were established utilizing data from 41 5-FU and 10 publicly available uracil studies. IIV in DPD chronotypes was assessed and personalized chronomodulated administrations were developed to achieve (i) comparable 5-FU peak plasma concentrations, (ii) comparable 5-FU exposure, and (iii) constant 5-FU plasma levels via "noise cancellation" chronomodulated infusion. The developed PBPK models capture the extent of diurnal variations in DPD activity and can help investigate individualized chronomodulated 5-FU therapy through testing alternative personalized dosing strategies.

Diurnal Changes in Capecitabine Clock-Controlled Metabolism Enzymes Are Responsible for Its Pharmacokinetics in Male Mice

The circadian timing system controls absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination processes of drug pharmacokinetics over a 24-h period. Exposure of target tissues to the active form of the drug and cytotoxicity display variations depending on the chronopharmacokinetics. For anticancer drugs with narrow therapeutic ranges and dose-limiting side effects, it is particularly important to know the temporal changes in pharmacokinetics. A previous study indicated that pharmacokinetic profile of capecitabine was different depending on dosing time in rat. However, it is not known how such difference is attributed with respect to diurnal rhythm. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated capecitabine-metabolizing enzymes in a diurnal rhythm-dependent manner. To this end, C57BL/6J male mice were orally treated with 500 mg/kg capecitabine at ZT1, ZT7, ZT13, or ZT19. We then determined pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'DFCR), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'DFUR), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in plasma and liver. Results revealed that plasma C_max and AUC_0-6h (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 h) values of capecitabine, 5'DFUR, and 5-FU were higher during the rest phase (ZT1 and ZT7) than the activity phase (ZT13 and ZT19) (p < 0.05). Similarly, C_max and AUC_0-6h values of 5'DFUR and 5-FU in liver were higher during the rest phase than activity phase (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in liver concentrations of capecitabine and 5'DFCR. We determined the level of the enzymes responsible for the conversion of capecitabine and its metabolites at each ZT. Results indicated the levels of carboxylesterase 1 and 2, cytidine deaminase, uridine phosphorylase 2, and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (p < 0.05) are being rhythmically regulated and, in turn, attributed different pharmacokinetics profiles of capecitabine and its metabolism. This study highlights the importance of capecitabine administration time to increase the efficacy with minimum adverse effects.

The past, present, and future of chemotherapy with a focus on individualization of drug dosing

While there have been rapid advances in developing new and more targeted drugs to treat cancer, much less progress has been made in individualizing dosing. Even though the introduction of immunotherapies such as CAR T-cells and checkpoint inhibitors, as well as personalized therapies that target specific mutations, have transformed clinical treatment of cancers, chemotherapy remains a mainstay in oncology. Chemotherapies are typically dosed on either a body surface area (BSA) or weight basis, which fails to account for pharmacokinetic differences between patients. Drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion rates can vary between patients, resulting in considerable differences in exposure to the active drugs. These differences result in suboptimal dosing, which can reduce efficacy and increase side-effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), genotype guided dosing, and chronomodulation have been developed to address this challenge; however, despite improving clinical outcomes, they are rarely implemented in clinical practice for chemotherapies. Thus, there is a need to develop interventions that allow for individualized drug dosing of chemotherapies, which can help maximize the number of patients that reach the most efficacious level of drug in the blood while mitigating the risks of underdosing or overdosing. In this review, we discuss the history of the development of chemotherapies, their mechanisms of action and how they are dosed. We discuss substantial intraindividual and interindividual variability in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics. We then propose potential engineering solutions that could enable individualized dosing of chemotherapies, such as closed-loop drug delivery systems and bioresponsive biomaterials.

Circadian variations in the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites in rats

Capecitabine, an orally available prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, is widely used to treat patients with colorectal cancer. Although various studies have shown circadian variations in plasma 5-fluorouracil concentrations during long-term infusion, it is still unknown whether circadian variations also exist following administration of capecitabine. The present study aimed to investigate whether the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites, including 5-fluorouracil, vary according to administration time in rats. Rats were orally administered capecitabine (180mg/kg) at 07:00 (23h after light onset, HALO), 13:00 (5 HALO), or 19:00h (11 HALO). Plasma concentrations of capecitabine and its metabolites, such as 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5'-DFCR), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), and 5-fluorouracil, were determined after capecitabine administration. The results showed that the t_1/2 and AUC_0-∞ values of 5-fluorouracil differed as a function of the dosing time of capecitabine. The maximum and minimum mean t_1/2 values of 5-fluorouracil were obtained when the drug was administered at 07:00h (23 HALO: 3.1±1.2h) and 13:00h (5 HALO: 1.5±0.6h), respectively. The AUC_0-∞ value of 5-fluorouracil at 07:00h (23 HALO: 533.9±195.7μmol∙h/L) was 1.8-fold higher than the value at 13:00h (5 HALO: 302.5±157.1μmol∙h/L). The clearance of 5-fluorouracil followed a cosine circadian curve, and the simulated population mean clearance was highest at rest times and lowest during active times in rats. The results for the plasma 5'-DFCR and 5'-DFUR levels indicated that circadian variations in the sequential metabolism of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil would also affect plasma 5-fluorouracil levels following capecitabine administration. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites, including 5-fluorouracil, varied according to time of dosing, suggesting that the capecitabine administration time is an important factor in achieving sufficient efficacy and reducing toxicity in patients.

Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan, Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil During Hepatic Artery Chronomodulated Infusion: A Translational European OPTILIV Study

The combination of hepatic artery infusion (HAI) of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin with intravenous cetuximab has safely achieved prolonged survival in colorectal cancer patients with extensive liver metastases and prior treatment. Systemic exposure to the drugs or their main metabolites was determined during the first course of chronomodulated triplet HAI in 11 patients and related to toxicities after one or three courses. Consistent trends were found between the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values of irinotecan, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN38; a bioactive metabolite), total oxaliplatin and platinum ultrafiltrate (P-UF), on the one hand, and subsequent leukopenia severity, on the other hand. Moreover, the maximum plasma concentration (C _max) and the AUC of P-UF significantly predicted grades of diarrhoea (p = 0.004 and 0.017, respectively) and anaemia (p = 0.001 and 0.008, respectively) after the first course. Systemic drug exposure helps explain both the adverse events and the low rate of extrahepatic progression-a usual drawback of HAI chemotherapy-thus supporting upfront testing of the regimen. Systems optimization of chronomodulated HAI delivery could further reduce adverse events.

Systems Chronotherapeutics

Chronotherapeutics aim at treating illnesses according to the endogenous biologic rhythms, which moderate xenobiotic metabolism and cellular drug response. The molecular clocks present in individual cells involve approximately fifteen clock genes interconnected in regulatory feedback loops. They are coordinated by the suprachiasmatic nuclei, a hypothalamic pacemaker, which also adjusts the circadian rhythms to environmental cycles. As a result, many mechanisms of diseases and drug effects are controlled by the circadian timing system. Thus, the tolerability of nearly 500 medications varies by up to fivefold according to circadian scheduling, both in experimental models and/or patients. Moreover, treatment itself disrupted, maintained, or improved the circadian timing system as a function of drug timing. Improved patient outcomes on circadian-based treatments (chronotherapy) have been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials, especially for cancer and inflammatory diseases. However, recent technological advances have highlighted large interpatient differences in circadian functions resulting in significant variability in chronotherapy response. Such findings advocate for the advancement of personalized chronotherapeutics through interdisciplinary systems approaches. Thus, the combination of mathematical, statistical, technological, experimental, and clinical expertise is now shaping the development of dedicated devices and diagnostic and delivery algorithms enabling treatment individualization. In particular, multiscale systems chronopharmacology approaches currently combine mathematical modeling based on cellular and whole-body physiology to preclinical and clinical investigations toward the design of patient-tailored chronotherapies. We review recent systems research works aiming to the individualization of disease treatment, with emphasis on both cancer management and circadian timing system-resetting strategies for improving chronic disease control and patient outcomes.

Is monitoring of plasma 5-fluorouracil levels in metastatic / advanced colorectal cancer clinically effective? A systematic review

Background

Pharmacokinetic guided dosing of 5-fluorouracil chemotherapies to bring plasma 5-fluorouracil into a desired therapeutic range may lead to fewer side effects and better patient outcomes. High performance liquid chromatography and a high throughput nanoparticle immunoassay (My5-FU) have been used in conjunction with treatment algorithms to guide dosing. The objective of this study was to assess accuracy, clinical effectiveness and safety of plasma 5-fluorouracil guided dose regimen(s) versus standard regimens based on body surface area in colorectal cancer.

Methods

We undertook a systematic review. MEDLINE; MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations; EMBASE; Cochrane Library; Science Citation Index and Conference Proceedings (Web of Science); and NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme were searched from inception to January 2014. We reviewed evidence on accuracy of My5-FU for estimating plasma 5-fluorouracil and on the clinical effectiveness of pharmacokinetic dosing compared to body surface area dosing. Estimates of individual patient data for overall survival and progression-free survival were reconstructed from published studies. Survival and adverse events data were synthesised and examined for consistency across studies.

Results

My5-FU assays were found to be consistent with reference liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Comparative studies pointed to gains in overall survival and in progression-free survival with pharmacokinetic dosing, and were consistent across multiple studies.

Conclusions

Although our analyses are encouraging, uncertainties remain because evidence is mainly from outmoded 5-fluorouracil regimens; a randomised controlled trial is urgently needed to investigate new dose adjustment methods in modern treatment regimens.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-016-2581-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Fluorouracil plasma monitoring: systematic review and economic evaluation of the My5-FU assay for guiding dose adjustment in patients receiving fluorouracil chemotherapy by continuous infusion

BACKGROUND

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapy used in colorectal, head and neck (H&N) and other cancers. Dose adjustment is based on body surface area (BSA) but wide variations occur. Pharmacokinetic (PK) dosing is suggested to bring plasma levels into the therapeutic range to promote fewer side effects and better patient outcomes. We investigated the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the My5-FU assay for PK dose adjustment to 5-FU therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence on the accuracy of the My5-FU assay compared with gold standard methods [high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)]; the effectiveness of My5-FU PK dosing compared with BSA; the effectiveness of HPLC and/or LC-MS compared with BSA; the generalisability of published My5-FU and PK studies; costs of using My5-FU; to develop a cost-effectiveness model.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and other databases between January and April 2014.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts with arbitration and consensus agreement. We undertook quality assessment. We reconstructed Kaplan-Meier plots for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for comparison of BSA and PK dosing. We developed a Markov model to compare My5-FU with BSA dosing which modelled PFS, OS and adverse events, using a 2-week cycle over a 20 year time horizon with a 3.5% discount rate. Health impacts were evaluated from the patient perspective, while costs were evaluated from the NHS and Personal Social Services perspective.

RESULTS

A total of 8341 records were identified through electronic searches and 35 and 54 studies were included in the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness reviews respectively. There was a high apparent correlation between My5-FU, HPLC and LC-MS/mass spectrometer but upper and lower limits of agreement were -18% to 30%. Median OS were estimated as 19.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.0 to 21.0] months for PK versus 14.6 (95% CI 14.1 to 15.3) months for BSA for 5-FU+folinic acid (FA); and 27.4 (95% CI 23.2 to 38.8) months for PK versus 20.6 (95% CI 18.4 to 22.9) months for BSA for FOLFOX6 in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PK versus BSA studies were generalisable to the relevant populations. We developed cost-effectiveness models for mCRC and H&N cancer. The base case assumed a cost per My5-FU assay of £ 61.03. For mCRC for 12 cycles of a oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and FA (FOLFOX) regimen, there was a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of 0.599 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £ 4148 per QALY. Probabilistic and scenario analyses gave similar results. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showed My5-FU to be 100% cost-effective at a threshold of £ 20,000 per QALY. For H&N cancer, again, given caveats about the poor evidence base, we also estimated that My5-FU is likely to be cost-effective at a threshold of £ 20,000 per QALY.

LIMITATIONS

Quality and quantity of evidence were very weak for PK versus BSA dosing for all cancers with no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using current regimens. For H&N cancer, two studies of regimens no longer in use were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a linked evidence approach, My5-FU appears to be cost-effective at a willingness to pay of £ 20,000 per QALY for both mCRC and H&N cancer. Considerable uncertainties remain about evidence quality and practical implementation. RCTs are needed of PK versus BSA dosing in relevant cancers.

Circadian variation in plasma 5-fluorouracil concentrations during a 24 hour constant-rate infusion

Background

Varying the rate of continuous intravenous infusions of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) chemotherapy over a 24-hour period has been reported to improve patient outcomes. It has been hypothesized that circadian variation in drug disposition is a contributing factor. We analyzed 5-FU concentrations during a 24-hour continuous 5-FU infusion.

Methods

Sixty-four subjects with advanced malignancies including pancreatic, hepatocellular, colorectal as well as other epithelial malignancies and either abnormal hepatic or renal function were treated on a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of weekly 24-hour intravenous infusions of 5-FU and leucovorin. No other concomitant anticancer therapy was administered. Blood samples were collected every three hours from 61 subjects for measurement of plasma 5-FU during the first two weekly infusions.

Results

After adjusting for differences in dose, elapsed time from start of infusion and infusion number (2 versus 1), mean 5-FU concentration was highest at 6 am and lowest at 3 pm, with an overall change in the mean from 3 pm to 6 am of +20 percent (95% CI = 12–28%). However, this variation in mean concentration associated with time of day was comparable in magnitude to the between-patient differences, within-patient differences between infusions, and the residual variation within infusion (coefficient of variation = 21%).

Conclusions

Our data show systematic variation by time of day in plasma concentrations of 5-FU administered at a constant rate over 24 hours, but it is small compared to the total variation in plasma concentration contributed by other sources. Circadian variation in men was more pronounced than in women.

Pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis of phase I, II and III studies of linifanib in cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Linifanib is a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which can inhibit members of the vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor families. The objective of this analysis was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of linifanib in cancer patients.

METHODS

We pooled 7,351 linifanib plasma concentrations from 1,010 cancer patients enrolled in 13 clinical studies. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was performed using NONMEM version 7.2. The covariates that were screened included the cancer type, co-medications, creatinine clearance, formulation, fed status, liver function markers (bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen [BUN], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), albumin, age, sex, race, body weight, surface area and body mass index.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and disposition best described linifanib pharmacokinetics. An increase in body weight was associated with less than proportional increases in volumes of distribution. Subjects with hepatocellular carcinoma and renal cell carcinoma were estimated to have 63 and 86% larger volumes of distribution, respectively, than subjects with the other cancer types. Females had 25% slower oral clearance (CL/F) than males, while subjects with colorectal cancer had 41% faster CL/F than other subjects. For linifanib bioavailability, subjects with refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome had 43% lower bioavailability, evening doses were associated with 27% lower bioavailability than morning doses, and administration of linifanib under fed conditions decreased the bioavailability by 14%. Finally, the oral solution formulation showed two-fold faster absorption than the tablet formulations.

CONCLUSION

The use of mixed-effects modelling allowed robust assessment of the impact of the concomitant effects of body size, different cancer types, formulation, diurnal variation, sex and food on linifanib pharmacokinetics. The developed population pharmacokinetic model describes linifanib concentrations adequately and can be used to conduct simulations or to evaluate the linifanib exposure-response relationship.

Evaluation of 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetic models and therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer patients

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains the cornerstone of all currently applied regimens for the treatment of patients with cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, breast, and head and neck. Unfortunately, a large variation in the clearance of 5-FU has been observed between patients, suggesting that some patients might receive nonoptimal 5-FU doses. However, therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-FU has been shown to result in reduced intra- and inter-individual variability in 5-FU plasma levels and pharmacokinetically guided dose adjustments of 5-FU-containing therapy results in a significantly improved efficacy and tolerability. To date, compartmental Michaelis-Menten elimination-based modeling has proven to be a sensitive and accurate tool for analyzing the pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and to identify patients with a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. These Michaelis-Menten models also allow the use of a limited sampling strategy and offer the opportunity to predict a priori the 5-FU plasma concentrations in patients receiving adapted doses of 5-FU.

Circadian molecular clocks and cancer

Physiological processes such as the sleep-wake cycle, metabolism and hormone secretion are controlled by a circadian rhythm adapted to 24h day-night periodicity. This circadian synchronisation is in part controlled by ambient light decreasing melatonin secretion by the pineal gland and co-ordinated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus. Peripheral cell autonomous circadian clocks controlled by the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the master regulator, exist within every cell of the body and are comprised of at least twelve genes. These include the basic helix-loop-helix/PAS domain containing transcription factors; Clock, BMal1 and Npas2 which activate transcription of the periodic genes (Per1 and Per2) and cryptochrome genes (Cry1 and Cry2). Points of coupling exist between the cellular clock and the cell cycle. Cell cycle genes which are affected by the molecular circadian clock include c-Myc, Wee1, cyclin D and p21. Therefore the rhythm of the circadian clock and cancer are interlinked. Molecular examples exist including activation of Per2 leads to c-myc overexpression and an increased tumor incidence. Mice with mutations in Cryptochrome 1 and 2 are arrhythmic (lack a circadian rhythm) and arrhythmic mice have a faster rate of growth of implanted tumors. Epidemiological finding of relevance include 'The Nurses' Health Study' where it was established that women working rotational night shifts have an increased incidence of breast cancer. Compounds that affect circadian rhythm exist with attendant future therapeutic possibilities. These include casein kinase I inhibitors and a candidate small molecule KL001 that affects the degradation of cryptochrome. Theoretically the cell cycle and malignant disease may be targeted vicariously by selective alteration of the cellular molecular clock.

The role of clock genes in pharmacology

The physiology of a wide variety of organisms is organized according to periodic environmental changes imposed by the earth's rotation. This way, a large number of physiological processes present diurnal rhythms regulated by an internal timing system called the circadian clock. As part of the rhythmicity in physiology, drug efficacy and toxicity can vary with time. Studies over the past four decades present diurnal oscillations in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. On the other hand, diurnal variations in the availability and sensitivity of drug targets have been correlated with time-dependent changes in drug effectiveness. In this review, we provide evidence supporting the regulation of drug kinetics and dynamics by the circadian clock. We also use the examples of hypertension and cancer to show current achievements and challenges in chronopharmacology.

Circadian Timing in Cancer Treatments

The circadian timing system is composed of molecular clocks, which drive 24-h changes in xenobiotic metabolism and detoxification, cell cycle events, DNA repair, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. The cellular circadian clocks are coordinated by endogenous physiological rhythms, so that they tick in synchrony in the host tissues that can be damaged by anticancer agents. As a result, circadian timing can modify 2- to 10-fold the tolerability of anticancer medications in experimental models and in cancer patients. Improved efficacy is also seen when drugs are given near their respective times of best tolerability, due to (a) inherently poor circadian entrainment of tumors and (b) persistent circadian entrainment of healthy tissues. Conversely, host clocks are disrupted whenever anticancer drugs are administered at their most toxic time. On the other hand, circadian disruption accelerates experimental and clinical cancer processes. Gender, circadian physiology, clock genes, and cell cycle critically affect outcome on cancer chronotherapeutics. Mathematical and systems biology approaches currently develop and integrate theoretical, experimental, and technological tools in order to further optimize and personalize the circadian administration of cancer treatments.

Identifying mechanisms of chronotolerance and chronoefficacy for the anticancer drugs 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin by computational modeling

We use an automaton model for the cell cycle to assess the toxicity of various circadian patterns of anticancer drug delivery so as to enhance the efficiency of cancer chronotherapy. Based on the sequential transitions between the successive phases G1, S (DNA replication), G2, and M (mitosis) of the cell cycle, the model allows us to simulate the distribution of cell cycle phases as well as entrainment by the circadian clock. We use the model to evaluate circadian patterns of administration of two anticancer drugs, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (l-OHP). We first consider the case of 5-FU, which exerts its cytotoxic effects on cells in S phase. We compare various circadian patterns of drug administration differing by the time of maximum drug delivery. The model explains why minimum cytotoxicity is obtained when the time of peak delivery is close to 4a.m., which temporal pattern of drug administration is used clinically for 5-FU. We also determine how cytotoxicity is affected by the variability in duration of cell cycle phases and by cell cycle length in the presence or absence of entrainment by the circadian clock. The results indicate that the same temporal pattern of drug administration can have minimum cytotoxicity toward one cell population, e.g. of normal cells, and at the same time can display high cytotoxicity toward a second cell population, e.g. of tumour cells. Thus the model allows us to uncover factors that may contribute to improve simultaneously chronotolerance and chronoefficacy of anticancer drugs. We next consider the case of oxaliplatin, which, in contrast to 5-FU, kills cells in different phases of the cell cycle. We incorporate into the model the pharmacokinetics of plasma thiols and intracellular glutathione, which interfere with the action of the drug by forming with it inactive complexes. The model shows how circadian changes in l-OHP cytotoxicity may arise from circadian variations in the levels of plasma thiols and glutathione. Corroborating experimental and clinical results, the simulations of the model account for the observation that the temporal profiles minimizing l-OHP cytotoxicity are in antiphase with those minimizing cytotoxicity for 5-FU.

Implications of circadian clocks for the rhythmic delivery of cancer therapeutics

The circadian timing system controls drug metabolism and cellular proliferation over the 24 h through molecular clocks in each cell, circadian physiology, and the suprachiasmatic nuclei--a hypothalamic pacemaker clock that coordinates circadian rhythms. As a result, both the toxicity and efficacy of over 30 anticancer agents vary by more than 50% as a function of dosing time in experimental models. The circadian timing system also down-regulates malignant growth in experimental models and possibly in cancer patients. Programmable-in-time infusion pumps and rhythmic physiology monitoring devices have made possible the application of chronotherapeutics to more than 2000 cancer patients without hospitalization. This strategy first revealed the antitumor efficacy of oxaliplatin against colorectal cancer. In this disease, international clinical trials have shown a five-fold improvement in patient tolerability and near doubling of antitumor activity through the chronomodulated, in comparison to constant-rate, delivery of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin. Here, the relevance of the peak time, with reference to circadian rhythms, of the chemotherapeutic delivery of these cancer medications for achieving best tolerability was investigated in 114 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and in 45 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The incidence of severe adverse events varied up to five-fold as a function of the choice of when during the 24 h the peak dose of the medications was timed. The optimal chronomodulated schedules corresponded to peak delivery rates at 1 a.m. or 4 a.m. for 5-fluorouracil-leucovorin, at 1 p.m. or 4 p.m. for oxaliplatin, and at 4 p.m. for carboplatin. Sex of patient was an important determinant of drug schedule tolerability. This finding is consistent with recent results from a chronotherapy trial involving 554 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, where sex also predicted survival outcome from chronotherapy, but not conventional drug delivery. Ongoing translational studies, mathematical modeling, and technology developments are further paving the way for tailoring cancer chronotherapeutics to the main rhythmic characteristics of the individual patient. Targeting therapeutic delivery to the dynamics of the cross-talk between the circadian clock, the cell division cycle, and pharmacology pathways represents a new challenge to concurrently improve the quality of life and survival of cancer patients through personalized cancer chronotherapeutics.

A cell cycle automaton model for probing circadian patterns of anticancer drug delivery

To optimize the temporal patterning of drug delivery used in cancer chronotherapy, we resort to an automaton model describing the transitions through the successive phases of the cell cycle. The model accounts for the progressive desynchronization of cells due to the variability of the durations of the cell cycle phases, and for the entrainment of the cell cycle by the circadian clock. Focusing on the cytotoxic effect of the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which kills cells in the S phase, we compare the effect of continuous infusion of 5-FU with various circadian patterns of 5-FU administration that peak either at 4 a.m., 10 a.m., 4 p.m., or 10 p.m. The model indicates that the cytotoxic effect of 5-FU is minimum for the circadian delivery peaking at 4 a.m., and maximum for the continuous infusion or the circadian pattern peaking at 4 p.m. These results fit well with experimental observations and illustrate how the modeling approach based on the cell cycle automaton may help to predict the cytotoxic effect of anticancer drugs affecting various phases of the cell cycle.

Circadian rhythms: mechanisms and therapeutic implications

The mammalian circadian system is organized in a hierarchical manner in that a central pacemaker in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the brain's hypothalamus synchronizes cellular circadian oscillators in most peripheral body cells. Fasting-feeding cycles accompanying rest-activity rhythms are the major timing cues in the synchronization of many, if not most, peripheral clocks, suggesting that the temporal coordination of metabolism and proliferation is a major task of the mammalian timing system. The inactivation of noxious food components by hepatic, intestinal, and renal detoxification systems is among the metabolic processes regulated in a circadian manner, with the understanding of the involved clock output pathways emerging. The rhythmic control of xenobiotic detoxification provides the molecular basis for the dosing time-dependence of drug toxicities and efficacy. This knowledge can in turn be used in improving or designing chronotherapeutics for the patients who suffer from many of the major human diseases.

How may anticancer chemotherapy with fluorouracil be individualised?

Fluorouracil is used clinically against various solid tumours. Both fluorouracil toxicity and pharmacokinetics vary highly within and between individuals. The reasons why doses are not individualised routinely are difficulties in defining, predicting and achieving an optimal fluorouracil exposure or dose because of a narrow therapeutic index, nonlinear pharmacokinetics, variabilities in administration rates and metabolism, and in targets like thymidylate synthase. To individualise fluorouracil administration before the first dose, assessment of the individual dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity may be useful, because this genetically highly polymorphic enzyme controls approximately 80% of fluorouracil elimination. A complete or partial loss of DPD activity in 0.1 and 3-5% of Caucasians, respectively, leads to increased fluorouracil exposure and toxicity. Several methods to assess DPD activity in patients have been proposed (genotyping, various phenotyping methods), but each of them has limitations, as has the fluorouracil test dose approach. To adapt exposure towards fluorouracil a priori, a combination of genotyping and phenotyping may yield better prediction of toxicity than one method alone. A prerequisite for dose adaptation is the definition of fluorouracil exposure ranges with sufficient therapeutic activity, but without serious toxicity. While an increased risk of leukopenia, diarrhoea, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome during continuous 5-day infusions was related to fluorouracil exposures above an area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) threshold of 25-30 mg.h/L, tumour response was higher when an AUC of approximately 30 mg.h/L was achieved, illustrating the extremely narrow therapeutic window of fluorouracil. Pharmacokinetic target values are less clear for other regimens, including chronomodulated regimens, which yielded a superior clinically efficacy and tolerability in several trials. However, the monitoring of fluorouracil plasma concentrations seems principally useful for individual a posteriori dose adjustment. Whether an adaptation of the fluorouracil starting dose to the results of two DPD activity tests before fluorouracil administration a priori, and the adaptation of doses to fluorouracil exposure a posteriori is a reasonable approach to better prevent toxicity and increase efficacy, remains to be evaluated in randomised clinical studies comparing these strategies to routine clinical safety monitoring.

Circadian Variability of Pharmacokinetics of 5-Fluorouracil and CLOCK T3111C Genetic Polymorphism in Patients With Esophageal Carcinoma

The variations of plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were investigated in 30 esophageal cancer patients treated with repetitive protracted venous infusion (PVI) of 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy, and in an attempt to find a new possible candidate that explains their variations, CLOCK T3111C genetic polymorphism was examined. The patients have received 2 courses of chemoradiotherapy consisting of 2 cycles of 5-day PVI of 5-FU (400 mg/m/d) with cisplatin and concurrent radiation. The plasma concentrations of 5-FU were determined at 5 PM on day 3 and 5 AM on day 4 after the beginning of each 5-FU infusion. The CLOCK T3111C genotype was determined by polymerase chain reaction-restricted fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and by direct sequencing. Plasma concentrations were measured in 239 samples. In the first course, the plasma concentrations of 5-FU at 5 AM were significantly lower than those at 5 PM in the first cycle, whereas a similar tendency was observed in the second cycle, although not significantly (Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The plasma concentrations of 5-FU at 5 PM and 5 AM in the second cycle were both significantly higher than those in the first cycle, and their coefficient of variation in the former was also significantly smaller than that in the latter. These phenomena in the first course were also observed in the second one. These results revealed the elevation of plasma drug concentration and its reduced circadian variation during repetitive PVI of 5-FU. In 5-FU-based chemotherapy, its administration schedule should be made in consideration of these phenomena. The CLOCK T3111C genotype did not have a significant impact on the variation of the plasma concentrations of 5-FU in this study population. Further studies are needed to clarify the mechanism of these phenomena and to identify an easy-to-assess marker of circadian rhythms for use in individualizing delivery of 5-FU.

[Dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase (DPD): rhythm and consequences]

Dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase (DPD) is the rate limiting enzyme of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) catabolism and its activity is generally determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Several studies have highlighted interactions between toxicities to 5-FU and a DPD activity deficiency. Circadian variations in 5-FU anabolism enzymes are suggested. Circadian variations in 5-FU catabolism enzymes, and especially for DPD in healthy subjects or patients, have shown in some cases circadian variations in DPD activity but with different peak times. Based on this knowledge, chronomodulated therapy for the association 5-FU-folinic acid with maximal delivery rate in the first half of the night was shown clearly to be 5 times less toxic than control flat therapy. Nevertheless, in the most active chronotherapy pattern, 30% of the patients have also toxicities. However the timing of the individual peak of DPD activity remains controversial.

Impaired sleep and rhythms in persons with cancer

This review includes research findings from sleep-related studies on specific types of cancers, on specific types of treatment protocols, and on persons with end-stage cancer regardless of treatment protocol. Since treatment protocols have evolved in the past decade, literature since 1990 is emphasized. We conclude that researchers should design studies that attend to prior sleep history, gender, type of cancer and treatment modalities, and the specific type of sleep problems experienced over the course of diagnosis, treatment, and recovery. More research is also needed to understand sleep problems in children with cancer and sleep problems in family caregivers. Research is also needed on effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Daytime functioning, daytime sleepiness, and altered circadian rhythms should be considered salient outcomes in addition to severity of cancer-related fatigue. Clinicians should consider whether a patient's sleep problem has been chronic and unrelated to cancer, or precipitated by diagnosis and treatment. The specific type of sleep problem should be ascertained so that appropriate interventions can be prescribed. Appropriate interventions can include either pharmacological medication or behavioral strategies, and each has the potential to promote restorative sleep and thereby improve the patient's quality of life, daytime functioning, and well-being.

Phase I study of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin by continuous infusion chronotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximal tolerated dose of chronomodulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) given concurrently with radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-five patients with T3, T4 or recurrent rectal cancer received concurrent radiotherapy to a minimal dose of 4500 cGy. Chemotherapy was administered by a programmable pump in chronomodulated fashion, with 62.5% of the total dose given within 7 hours around 9:30 pm. The starting doses were LV at 5 mg/m2/d and 5-FU at 150 mg/m2/d. LV was escalated in 5-mg/m2 increments to 20 mg/m2/d; 5-FU was then escalated in 25 mg/m2 increments to the maximal tolerated dose.

RESULTS

Diarrhea and stomatitis were dose limiting, with Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurring in 16% and 5% of patients, respectively. Thirty-seven patients (84%) received their scheduled dose of radiotherapy (range, 4500-6000 cGy). Thirty-two patients had clinical T3 disease; all were treated with definitive surgery; 23 (71%) underwent sphincter-sparing surgery with complete resection in 28 (87%). Ten patients (31%) had no evidence of tumor in the pathologic specimen.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using chronomodulated 5-FU and LV is feasible. The recommended Phase II dose is 5-FU 200 mg/m2 and LV 20 mg/m2 daily for 5 weeks.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of 24-hour infusion 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with organ dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction are often treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), but there are few data to confirm the safety of this practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with solid tumors were eligible if they were able to fit into one of three organ dysfunction cohorts: I, creatinine >1.5 but < or =3.0 mg/dl and normal bilirubin; II, bilirubin >1.5 but <5.0 mg/dl with normal creatinine; or III, bilirubin > or =5.0 mg/dl with normal creatinine. 5-FU doses were escalated separately within each of the three cohorts. Leucovorin (LV) dosage was fixed at 500 mg/m(2). 5-FU was given as a 24-h infusion at 1000, 1800 or 2600 mg/m(2), and plasma concentrations were measured every 3 h during the first two infusions for each patient.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were treated. Toxicities did not appear to be related to organ dysfunction cohort. A weekly dose of of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) produced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in six of 20 evaluable patients. These DLTs included grade 3 fatigue (n = 3), grade 2 neutropenia precluding weekly dosing (n = 1), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1) and grade 3 mental status changes (n = 1). There was no relationship between serum bilirubin or serum creatinine and 5-FU clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with elevated bilirubin may be safely started on a weekly regimen of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) with leucovorin 500 mg/m(2) as a 24-h continuous infusion.

Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin during chronomodulated infusion in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients: a pilot investigation with preliminary results

Several clinical trials have demonstrated that the three-drug combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) administered chronomodulated improved antitumour efficacy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer and was better tolerated than constant-rate infusion. However, only a few pharmacokinetic data of 5-FU during chronomodulated infusion are available but up to now not for oxaliplatin. In this pilot study, the platinum levels of plasma ultrafiltrate (PUF) and total plasma were monitored during chronomodulated infusion of oxaliplatin, 5-FU and LV in 7 patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. A cycle of the 4-day chemotherapeutic regimen consisted of 12-h infusions with sinusoidal drug delivery rate of: oxaliplatin (25 mg/m2/d, peak at 16:00 hours), 5-FU and LV (750 mg/m2/d and 150 mg/m2/d, respectively, peak at 4:00 hours), the same scheme was reinitiated on day 15. Blood samples were collected on day 1 and day 4 during different cycles. Concentration-time profiles of ultrafilterable and total platinum in plasma during chronomodulated infusion were characterised. As expected, we found residual platinum levels in total plasma but not in PUF prior next cycle. Comparing day 1 with day 4, Cmax of platinum in PUF was significantly increased (84 +/- 13 ng/ml vs. 131 +/- 22 ng/ml, P = 0.012) as well as AUC0-24h of platinum in PUF (0.97 +/- 0.29 microg x h/ml vs. 1.90 +/- 0.44 microg x h/ml, P = 0.018). The same effect was observed for total plasma platinum suggesting an accumulation within the cycle. The observed interindividual variability of Cmax, tmax, AUC0-24h, t1/2 was moderate. Because of the small sample size in this pilot investigation, the findings need to be confirmed in larger pharmacokinetic studies. In a next step individual pharmacokinetic parameters should be associated with patient specific parameters and treatment-induced toxicity.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase circadian rhythm in mouse liver: comparison between enzyme activity and gene expression

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the rate-limiting enzyme of 5-fluorouracil (FU) catabolism. The relevance of the measurement of DPD activity for identifying DPD-deficient patients is lessened by circadian variability in DPD activity. Our purpose was to determine whether or not DPD mRNA is sustained by a circadian rhythm. Synchronised mice (male B6D2F1) were sacrificed at 3, 7, 11, 15, 19 or 23 Hours After Light Onset (HALO; eight mice per time-point). Liver DPD activity was determined by a radio-enzymatic assay and liver DPD expression by a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Mice synchronisation was controlled by leucocyte and neutrophil counts. Individual DPD activity ranged from 555 to 1575 pmol/min/mg prot; mean DPD activity was highest at 3 HALO (mean+/-standard error of the mean (S.E.M.); 1105+/-70) and lowest at 15 HALO (889+/-71). Individual liver DPD expression varied from 761 to 3481 units (DPD/beta actin ratio); the mean was lowest at 3 HALO (1406+/-112) and highest at 15 HALO (2067+/-214). Cosinor analysis indicated that respective double amplitudes of DPD activity and expression were 21 and 30% of the 24-h mean. The acrophases for activity and expression were 6:40 and 14:10 HALO, respectively, meaning that maximum activity occurred 16 h after the maximum observed expression. These results, revealing the existence of a circadian rhythm in DPD expression, should stimulate further studies to enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in the circadian regulation of the DPD enzyme.

Cancer chronotherapy: principles, applications, and perspectives

BACKGROUND

Cell physiology is regulated along the 24-hour timescale by a circadian clock, which is comprised of interconnected molecular loops involving at least nine genes. The cellular clocks are coordinated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus, a hypothalamic pacemaker that also helps the organism adjust to environmental cycles. The rest-activity rhythm is a reliable marker of the circadian system function in both rodents and humans. This circadian organization is responsible for predictable changes in the tolerability and efficacy of anticancer agents, and possibly also may be involved in tumor promotion or growth.

METHODS

Expected least toxic times of chemotherapy were extrapolated from experimental models to human subjects with reference to the rest-activity cycle. The clinical relevance of the chronotherapy principle (i.e., treatment administration as a function of rhythms) has been investigated previously in randomized multicenter trials.

RESULTS

In the current study, chronotherapeutic schedules were used to safely document activity of the combination of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin against metastatic colorectal carcinoma and to establish new medicosurgical management for this disease, and were reported to result in unprecedented long-term survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronotherapy concepts appear to offer further potential to improve current cancer treatment options as well as to optimize the development of new anticancer or supportive agents.

Management of chemotherapy-induced adverse effects in the treatment of colorectal cancer

The anticancer agents fluorouracil, raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin show limited efficacy in the treatment of colorectal cancer and may be associated with substantial toxicity. Therefore, the prevention and reduction of chemotherapy-induced adverse effects is of major significance, in accordance with the increasing concern for the quality of life of patients with cancer. Therapeutic drug monitoring of fluorouracil and chronomodulation of fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, have been effective in reducing the incidence and gravity of adverse effects in several clinical trials. However, these concepts have not been implemented in clinical practice yet. At the present time, dose adaptation and supportive measures are the main tools for toxicity control in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In this review, supportive measures for alleviation of the adverse effects of fluorouracil, raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, respectively, are described, based on study results. The main adverse effects of these agents are myelosuppression, oral mucositis, diarrhoea, acute cholinergic syndrome, nausea and emesis, neurotoxicity, hand-foot syndrome and other cutaneous adverse effects, ocular toxicity, cardiotoxicity, small bowel toxicity, asthenia, elevated liver transaminase levels and alopecia. The incidence and gravity of these adverse effects are more or less related to the agent and administration schedule involved. The supportive measures and recommendations include the use of specific drugs, alterations of administration schedule and several nonpharmacological methods. In addition, guidelines for dosage adjustments when toxicity occurs are presented. For optimal management of adverse effects, patients should be considered individually, while patients, nurses and physicians should cooperate to identify and treat adverse effects in an early stage of their development.

A pharmacokinetic evaluation of 0.5% and 5% fluorouracil topical cream in patients with actinic keratosis

BACKGROUND

Systemic absorption of topical fluorouracil, although usually low, may vary as a result of the specific skin disease, product formulation, and other factors.

OBJECTIVE

The present study was conducted to determine the pharmacokinetic profile and tolerability of a new topical 0.5% fluorouracil cream formulation compared with that of a currently available topical formulation of 5% fluorouracil cream.

METHODS

This was an open-label, parallel-group study in which patients with actinic keratosis (AK) were randomized to treatment with either topical 0.5% fluorouracil once daily or topical 5% fluorouracil twice daily for up to 28 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (all white; mean age, 64 years) participated in the study, 11 receiving topical 0.5% fluorouracil and 10 receiving topical 5% fluorouracil. Ten patients receiving 0.5% fluorouracil and 7 patients receiving 5% fluorouracil completed the 28-day study. Plasma concentrations of fluorouracil were detectable in 3 of 10 patients treated with 0.5% fluorouracil and 9 of 10 patients treated with 5% fluorouracil; fluorouracil was detected in the urine of 5 and 9 patients, respectively. Despite the one-tenth difference in drug concentration between formulations, the cumulative amount excreted in the urine of the 0.5% fluorouracil group was approximately one fortieth that of the 5% fluorouracil group. This difference may be a result of variations in vehicle formulations. At least 1 adverse event was reported by 4 of 11 patients in the 0.5% fluorouracil group and all 10 patients in the 5% fluorouracil group. The most common adverse event, facial irritation, was evident with both formulations but reached a plateau during treatment with 0.5% fluorouracil. All patients treated with 0.5% fluorouracil tolerated the full course of therapy, whereas 3 patients in the 5% fluorouracil group discontinued treatment early. No serious treatment-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that 0.5% fluorouracil has minimal systemic absorption and is well tolerated in patients with AK.

Circadian chronotherapy for human cancers

Cell physiology is regulated by a 24-hour clock, consisting of interconnected molecular loops, involving at least nine genes. The cellular clock is coordinated by the suprachiasmatic nucleus, a hypothalamic pacemaker which also helps the organism to adjust to environmental cycles. This circadian organisation brings about predictable changes in the body's tolerance and tumour responsiveness to anticancer agents, and possibly also for cancer promotion or growth. The clinical relevance of the chronotherapy principle, ie treatment regimens based upon circadian rhythms, has been demonstrated in randomised, multicentre trials. Chronotherapeutic schedules have been used to document the safety and activity of oxaliplatin against metastatic colorectal cancer and have formed the basis for a new approach to the medicosurgical management of this disease, which achieved unprecedented long-term survival. The chronotherapy concept offers further promise for improving current cancer-treatment options, as well as for optimising the development of new anticancer or supportive agents.

Risk factors determining chemotherapeutic toxicity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Antitumour therapy in advanced colorectal cancer has limited efficacy. For decades, fluorouracil has been the main anticancer drug for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Recently, however, new agents have been introduced: raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Currently, the dosage for an individual patient is calculated from the estimated body surface area of the patient. Toxicity, however, frequently necessitates decreasing the dosage, extending the dose interval or even discontinuing treatment. Risk factors with predictive value for toxicity have been identified in several studies. These risk factors are often determined by the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the drug. In this review, the risk factors for toxicity of the cytotoxic agents used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer are considered. For fluorouracil, age, gender, performance status, genetic polymorphism of dihydropyridine dehydrogenase, drug administration schedule, circadian rhythm of plasma concentrations, history of previous chemotherapy-related diarrhoea, xerostomia, low neutrophil levels, and drug-drug interactions have been identified as affecting chemotherapeutic toxicity. For raltitrexed, gender and renal and hepatic impairment, and for oxaliplatin, renal impairment and circadian rhythm of plasma concentrations, respectively, can be considered as risk factors for toxicity. In addition, age, performance status, bilirubinaemia, genetic polymorphism of uridine 5'-diphosphate-glucuronyltransferase-1A1 and drug administration schedule have been shown to be related to irinotecan toxicity. The available literature suggests that dose adjustment based on these risk factors can be used to individualise the dose in order to decrease toxicity and to improve the therapeutic index. This also applies to therapeutic drug monitoring, which has been shown to be effective controlling the toxicity of fluorouracil in some studies. Future research is warranted to assess the potential advantage of dose individualisation of chemotherapy founded on risk factors, over direct dose calculation from the estimated body surface area, with regard to toxicity, therapeutic index, and quality of life, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Oxaliplatin: pharmacokinetics and chronopharmacological aspects

Oxaliplatin is the first clinically available diaminocyclohexane platinum coordination complex. The drug is non-cross-resistant with cisplatin or carboplatin and is one of the few active drugs against human colorectal cancer. Its cytotoxicity is synergistic with fluorouracil and folinic acid (leucovorin), the reference treatment for this disease. The main cumulative dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin is peripheral sensory neuropathy. The drug can also produce diarrhoea, vomiting and haematological suppression. Unlike cisplatin, no renal failure or peripheral motor neuropathy have been reported and the sensory neuropathy is partly reversible. Unlike carboplatin, oxaliplatin produces only mild to moderate haematological toxicity. Oxaliplatin undergoes biotransformation into aquated forms in the blood, where 3 species can be found: total platinum, ultrafilterable or 'free' platinum and erythrocyte platinum. Flameless atomic absorption (FAAS) is used for assaying platinum concentration in various tissues. Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), with a >10-fold lower sensitivity threshold than FAAS, was also used for the determination of oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin are described by a 3-compartment model. The drug rapidly crosses the cellular membrane as a result of its lipophilicity. Hence, at the end of a 2-hour infusion, approximately 40% of the blood platinum is found in erythrocytes. The distribution half-life of ultrafiltrated plasma platinum ranges from 10 to 25 minutes and its terminal elimination half-life is 26 hours (determined with FAAS) or 270 hours (ICP-MS). The elimination half-life of erythrocytic platinum is 12 to 50 days, close to that of erythrocytes. 30 to 50% of the platinum is recovered in the urine within 2 to 5 days, with renal clearance accounting for half of the total clearance of ultrafiltrated platinum. The total clearance of this species is correlated with the glomerular filtration rate. No pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship has been established for oxaliplatin. Pharmacokinetic alterations produced by fluorouracil + folinic acid or irinotecan were minimal if any. The prolonged stability of oxaliplatin makes it suitable for continuous infusions over 4 to 5 days, with a delivery rate which can be either constant or chronomodulated (peak rate at 1600h), using programmable ambulatory pumps. Chronomodulation significantly reduces toxicity and improves antitumour activity as compared with constant rate infusion. These differences in pharmacodynamic properties were paralleled by differences in plasma concentration time courses. The different drug concentration profiles achieved with different infusional modalities may be useful tools for understanding the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxaliplatin and may lead to further optimisation of its administration schedule and its combination with other drugs.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of two doses of calcium folinate combined with continuous fluorouracil infusion in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

The optimum dose of calcium folinate (leucovorin) as modulator of fluorouracil has not been defined yet. We conducted a randomized trial to compare the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of two doses of calcium folinate. 16 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were treated with 650 mg/m2/d fluorouracil as 5 day continuous infusion and randomized to receive either 20 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 calcium folinate as short infusion twice daily. The two diastereoisomers of calcium folinate were analyzed separately by chiral HPLC to account for differences in their pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetics of fluorouracil was not affected by folinate dosing. Total clearance of the active (6S)-diastereoisomer was found to be lower after the higher dose of folinate which can be explained by nonlinear metabolism. The incidence of treatment-induced mucositis significantly increased with (6S)-folinate exposure, whereas fluorouracil exposure was not related to this type of toxicity. In conclusion, exposure to folinate is more important for toxicity in this regimen than fluorouracil pharmacokinetics. Therefore, monitoring of fluorouracil plasma levels is not useful in this combination. Our results show that folinate dose should be carefully selected. Lower doses of folinate might be preferred because of less toxicity compared to higher doses.

A multicenter evaluation of intensified, ambulatory, chronomodulated chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin as initial treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. International Organization for Cancer Chronotherapy

BACKGROUND

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV), and oxaliplatin (I-OHP) was shown to be both more active against metastatic colorectal carcinoma and better tolerated if the drug delivery rate was chronomodulated according to circadian rhythms rather than constant. This allowed the authors to intensify the three-drug chronotherapy regimen and to assess its activity as the initial treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients in ten centers from four countries.

METHODS

Patients with previously untreated and inoperable measurable metastases from colorectal carcinoma received a daily administration of chronomodulated 5-FU (700 mg/m2/day, peak delivery rate at 04:00 hours), LV (300 mg/m2/day, peak delivery rate at 04:00 hours), and 1-OHP (25 mg/m2/day, peak delivery rate at 16:00 hours) for 4 days every 14 days. Intrapatient escalation of 5-FU dose was performed if toxicity was less than World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 2.

RESULTS

Of 90 enrolled patients, 35 had a WHO performance status of 1 or 2; 49 had metastases in > or = 2 organs. The liver was involved in 79 patients, 30 of whom had clinical hepatomegaly. The main dose-limiting toxicities were WHO modified Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea (41% of patients, 8.2% of courses), stomatitis (30% of patients, 5.1% of courses), and Grade 2 cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy (19% of patients after 12 courses). Two patients died with severe gastrointestinal toxicity. Using the intent-to-treat method, the overall objective response rate was 66% (95% confidence limits, 56-76%). Surgical removal of previously inoperable metastases was successful in 31 patients (34%). Histologic necrosis of metastases was >90% in 7 patients and complete in 1 patient. The median progression free survival and survival durations were 8.4 months (range, 5.9-10.9 months) and 18.5 months (range, 13.2-23.8 months), respectively, with 38% of the patients alive at 2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The objective response rate appeared to be approximately 3-fold as high as that achieved with current 5-FU-based regimens and translated into an approximately 50% increase in median survival. The hypothesis that this intensified, ambulatory, chronotherapy regimen can increase survival currently is being investigated in a multicenter randomized study conducted by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Chronotherapy Study Group.

Can pharmacokinetic monitoring improve clinical use of fluorouracil?

Fluorouracil is used clinically against a variety of solid tumors. It is a prodrug that undergoes a series of intracellular conversions to active cytotoxic species. There is wide interindividual variability in fluorouracil metabolism; furthermore, it has nonlinear kinetics that make it relatively more difficult to predict plasma concentrations after brief infusions compared with prolonged infusions. There is an increasing body of evidence that relates plasma fluorouracil concentrations to toxicity and effectiveness, and consequently there may be a definable mathematical relationship that describes a 'therapeutic window'. Dose nomograms and pharmacokinetic models based on limited sampling strategies have been developed, as have empirical dose escalation schedules based on multivariate analysis of the determinants of toxicity, The utility of these approaches should be tested in properly powered, prospective, randomised trials.

Chronopharmacologic aspects of continuous AcSDKP infusion in mice

Inconsistent results characterized N-acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP or Goralatide) effects upon hematologic proliferation, possibly because its circadian organization had been overlooked. We investigated the circadian changes in AcSDKP disposition in plasma and in bone marrow during continuous infusion and AcSDKP effects upon the circadian rhythms in bone marrow granulomonocytic precursors (CFU-GM) and circulating blood cell counts. One hundred ninety-six male B6D2F1 mice received a constant infusion of AcSDKP (24 microg/ day) or 0.9% NaCl for 7 days, using an osmotic minipump. All mice were synchronized with an alternation of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness for 3 weeks prior to study. Mice were sacrificed on the fifth or seventh infusional day at 3, 9, 15, or 21 hours after light onset (HALO) in order to assess plasma and bone marrow AcSDKP concentrations, CFU-GM, and/or circulating blood cell counts. In control mice, plasma and bone marrow AcSDKP concentrations displayed a circadian rhythm with a maximum level during the dark span, at 21 and 15 HALO respectively, while CFU-GM, leukocyte, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts peaked during early light. Continuous AcSDKP infusion increased fivefold mean plasma AcSDKP level at 3 or 9 HALO, thus inverted its physiologic rhythm and suppressed the CFU-GM peak that normally occurs at these times. This inhibition however, was indirect, because the rhythms in bone marrow AcSDKP concentration were similar with or without AcSDKP infusion. Conversely, mean leukocyte and lymphocyte counts were significantly reduced with AcSDKP infusion, while their circadian rhythms remained unaffected and were amplified. The results indicate that AcSDKP pharmacology displays circadian rhythmicity and warrant the exploration of chronopharmacologic schedules of AcSDKP delivery for further protecting bone marrow against chemotherapy insults.

Autoregulation of 5-fluorouracil metabolism

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a commonly used anticancer agent for the treatment of gastrointestinal, head and neck, and breast tumours. This study determined the influence of 5-FU on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity, the enzyme responsible for its in vivo degradation. DPD activity was measured in mononuclear cells obtained prior to and after the administration of 5-FU in 20 patients with colorectal cancer. Following the results from the human studies, DPD activity was measured in Sprague-Dawley rat liver up to 72 h after administration of 5-FU 200 mg/kg as a single injection. Total liver P450 content and the production of testosterone metabolites (indicative of CYP3A activity) were also analysed to determine the specificity of 5-FU-associated alteration in rat liver metabolism. Human mononuclear cell DPD activity decreased by a median of 38.7% following the administration of 5-FU (P = 0.001). 5-FU-induced alterations in rat liver DPD were also observed, with the lowest activity occurring 48 h after injection (50% of control activity; P = 0.009). Rat liver DPD activity returned to near control values by 72 h postinjection. Rat liver total P450 content and CYP3A activity were not significantly different in 5-FU treated or control tissues. Thus, 5-FU demonstrates autoregulation of its metabolism through inhibition of DPD activity. Although this inhibition appears to be specific for DPD, the mechanism for enzyme inhibition is not clear. These findings may aid in the design of 5-FU treatment regimens and provide the basis for further studies into the regulation of DPD.

Randomised multicentre trial of chronotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer. International Organization for Cancer Chronotherapy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of chemotherapy may be affected by circadian rhythms. Therefore, we tested chronomodulated infusion (administered to coincide with relevant circadian rhythms) of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid compared with a constant-rate infusion method. The combination of three drugs was delivered for 5-day courses with 16-day intervals.

METHODS

We expected chronotherapy to increase objective response rate by 20% compared with constant-rate infusion. We tested this effect in a randomised multicentre trial involving patients with previously untreated metastases from colorectal cancer who were enrolled at nine institutions in three countries. 93 patients were assigned chronotherapy and 93 were assigned constant-rate infusion via multichannel programmable ambulatory pumps. The trial was interrupted when a significant difference in main outcome was reached. All data were analysed by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

On enrollment, we found significant imbalances in two characteristics-abdominal gland or bone metastases (constant-rate infusion two patients, chronotherapy ten patients) and relapse from surgically treated metastases (constant-rate infusion seven patients, chronotherapy 22 patients). An objective response was obtained in 47 (51%) of the chronotherapy group, and in 27 (29%) of the constant-rate group (difference 21.5% [95% CI 13.7-31.2], p = 0.003). Chronotherapy reduced five-fold the rate of severe mucosal toxicity (14% vs 76%, p < 0.0001) and halved that of functional impairment from peripheral sensitive neuropathy (16% vs 31%, difference 15.0% [9.5-25.7], p < 0.01). Median time to treatment failure was 6.4 months on chronotherapy and 4.9 months on constant-rate infusion (p = 0.006), and 24% of the patients from the constant-rate infusion group received chronotherapy after failure. With a minimum follow-up of 3 years, median survival times and 3-year survival were similar in both groups (15.9 vs 16.9 months and 22% vs 21%, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

Chronotherapy was significantly less toxic and more effective than constant-rate infusion. The results support the concept of temporal selectivity of cancer chemotherapy.

A phase I trial of 5-day chronomodulated infusion of 5-fluorouracil and 1-folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

The aim of this phase I study was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), administered as a 5-day chronomodulated infusion in combination with 1-folinic acid (FA) to ambulatory metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Consecutive cohorts of 6 patients were given 5-FU and FA infusions from 10.00 p.m. to 10.00 a.m. with peak delivery at 4.00 a.m. by means of a multichannel programmable pump. The FA dose was always the same (150 mg/m2/d). For the first cohort, the 5-FU dose level was 600 mg/m2/d at the first course, escalated by 100 mg/m2 for each subsequent cohort. Intrapatient dose was also escalated by 100 mg/m2 if toxicity was less than grade 2. The courses were repeated every 3 weeks. Thirty-four patients (17 previously treated) received a total of 154 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of stomatitis and diarrhoea. No significant haematological, cutaneous or cardiac toxicity was encountered. The MTD of 5-FU was reached at the fourth level (first course at 900 mg/m2/d equal to 4500 mg/m2/course) with 5-FU increased to 1100 mg/m2/d (5500 mg/m2/course) in 4 patients. The received 5-FU dose intensity (DI) over the first 3 courses at this level was 1318 mg/m2/week. Thirty-three patients were assessed for response. An objective response was achieved in 1 out of the 13 previously-treated and in 8 out of the 20 previously-untreated patients. The chronomodulated infusion of 5-FU at a dose of 900 mg/m2/d, together with FA at 150 mg/m2/d for 5 days, was safely delivered to out-patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The low toxic profile and activity of this regimen in previously untreated patients deserves further exploration for the treatment of 5-FU-sensitive tumours.

Chronomodulation of chemotherapy against metastatic colorectal cancer. International Organization for Cancer Chronotherapy

Toxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and oxaliplatin (L-OHP), two active drugs against metastatic colorectal cancer, varied by 50% or more according to circadian dosing time in mice or rats. Adaptation of chemotherapy delivery to circadian rhythms (chronotherapy) was assessed in fully ambulatory outpatients, using multichannel programmable pumps. These devices allowed us to reliably test the clinical relevance of such a chronotherapy principle. First, single agent 5-day chronomodulated schedules were devised and assessed in Phase I and II trials with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, peak delivery at 4:00 h) or oxaliplatin (L-OHP, peak at 16:00 h). Both schedules were then combined, folinic acid (FA) being added, synchronous with 5-FU infusion. This three-drug chronomodulated regimen (chrono-FFL) produced a 58% response rate (95% C.I.: 48-68%) in 93 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, 46 of whom had previously received chemotherapy. In the first European randomised trial in 92 previously untreated patients, chronomodulated three-drug delivery achieved 53% response, as compared to 32% in those patients receiving flat infusion (P = 0.038). These respective figures were confirmed in a subsequent multicentre randomised trial involving 186 additional patients. Since the most active schedule was also the least toxic one by 2- to 10-fold, chrono-FFL was further intensified in three consecutive Phase II trials involving a total of 200 additional patients. Results suggest that both response rate and quality were further improved with such treatment intensification. Thus, chrono-FFL more than doubled the activity of chemotherapy against metastatic colorectal cancer in a multicentre European setting.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Circadian rhythms and cancer chemotherapy

Experimental and clinical pertinent data regarding circadian rhythmicities are reviewed in (1) target tissues, i.e., healthy tissues (actively proliferating or not) and tumor tissues, (2) pharmacology of anticancer agents, (3) toxicity and tolerance of these agents and (4) antitumor activity of cancer chemotherapy. The basic concepts of chronotolerance and/or of chronoefficacy have brought new hopes for further amelioration in the management of cancer patients. Quite recent published Phase II and III clinical trials have demonstrated that new improvements on the therapeutic index have been achieved through ambulatory chronotherapy for various solid tumors.