S phase-dependent interaction with DNMT1 dictates the role of UHRF1 but not UHRF2 in DNA methylation maintenance. Cell Res. 2011;21:1723-1739. [PMID: 22064703 DOI: 10.1038/cr.2011.176]

Roles of post-translational modifications of UHRF1 in cancer

UHRF1 as a member of RING-finger type E3 ubiquitin ligases family, is an epigenetic regulator with five structural domains. It has been involved in the regulation of a series of biological functions, such as DNA replication, DNA methylation, and DNA damage repair. Additionally, aberrant overexpression of UHRF1 has been observed in over ten cancer types, indicating that UHRF1 is a typical oncogene. The overexpression of UHRF1 repressed the transcription of such tumor-suppressor genes as CDKN2A, BRCA1, and CDH1 through DNMT1-mediated DNA methylation. In addition to the upstream transcription factors regulating gene transcription, post-translational modifications (PTMs) also contribute to abnormal overexpression of UHRF1 in cancerous tissues. The types of PTM include phosphorylation, acetylation, methylationand ubiquitination, which regulate protein stability, histone methyltransferase activity, intracellular localization and the interaction with binding partners. Recently, several novel PTM types of UHRF1 have been reported, but the detailed mechanisms remain unclear. This comprehensive review summarized the types of UHRF1 PTMs, as well as their biological functions. A deep understanding of these crucial mechanisms of UHRF1 is pivotal for the development of novel UHRF1-targeted anti-cancer therapeutic strategies in the future.

Understanding the role of DNA methylation in colorectal cancer: Mechanisms, detection, and clinical significance

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide, ranking third in incidence and second in mortality. Remarkably, early stage localized CRC has a 5-year survival rate of over 90%; in stark contrast, the corresponding 5-year survival rate for metastatic CRC (mCRC) is only 14%. Compounding this problem is the staggering lack of effective therapeutic strategies. Beyond genetic mutations, which have been identified as critical instigators of CRC initiation and progression, the importance of epigenetic modifications, particularly DNA methylation (DNAm), cannot be underestimated, given that DNAm can be used for diagnosis, treatment monitoring and prognostic evaluation. This review addresses the intricate mechanisms governing aberrant DNAm in CRC and its profound impact on critical oncogenic pathways. In addition, a comprehensive review of the various techniques used to detect DNAm alterations in CRC is provided, along with an exploration of the clinical utility of cancer-specific DNAm alterations.

Non-canonical functions of UHRF1 maintain DNA methylation homeostasis in cancer cells

DNA methylation is an essential epigenetic chromatin modification, and its maintenance in mammals requires the protein UHRF1. It is yet unclear if UHRF1 functions solely by stimulating DNA methylation maintenance by DNMT1, or if it has important additional functions. Using degron alleles, we show that UHRF1 depletion causes a much greater loss of DNA methylation than DNMT1 depletion. This is not caused by passive demethylation as UHRF1-depleted cells proliferate more slowly than DNMT1-depleted cells. Instead, bioinformatics, proteomics and genetics experiments establish that UHRF1, besides activating DNMT1, interacts with DNMT3A and DNMT3B and promotes their activity. In addition, we show that UHRF1 antagonizes active DNA demethylation by TET2. Therefore, UHRF1 has non-canonical roles that contribute importantly to DNA methylation homeostasis; these findings have practical implications for epigenetics in health and disease.

UHRF2 accumulates in early G1-phase after serum stimulation or mitotic exit to extend G1 and total cell cycle length

Ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domains 2 (UHRF2) regulates the cell cycle and epigenetics as a multi-domain protein sharing homology with UHRF1. UHRF1 functions with DNMT1 to coordinate daughter strand methylation during DNA replication, but UHRF2 can't perform this function, and its roles during cell cycle progression are not well defined. UHRF2 role as an oncogene vs. tumor suppressor differs in distinct cell types. UHRF2 interacts with E2F1 to control Cyclin E1 (CCNE1) transcription. UHRF2 also functions in a reciprocal loop with Cyclin E/CDK2 during G1, first as a direct target of CDK2 phosphorylation, but also as an E3-ligase with direct activity toward both Cyclin E and Cyclin D. In this study, we demonstrate that UHRF2 is expressed in early G1 following either serum stimulation out of quiescence or in cells transiting directly out of M-phase, where UHRF2 protein is lost. Further, UHRF2 depletion in G2/M is reversed with a CDK1 specific inhibitor. UHRF2 controls expression levels of cyclins and CDK inhibitors and controls its own transcription in a negative-feedback loop. Deletion of UHRF2 using CRISPR/Cas9 caused a delay in passage through each cell cycle phase. UHRF2 loss culminated in elevated levels of cyclins but also the CDK inhibitor p27KIP1, which regulates G1 passage, to reduce retinoblastoma phosphorylation and increase the amount of time required to reach G1/S passage. Our data indicate that UHRF2 is a central regulator of cell-cycle pacing through its complex regulation of cell cycle gene expression and protein stability.

Transcriptome signatures of host tissue infected with African swine fever virus reveal differential expression of associated oncogenes

African swine fever (ASF) has emerged as a threat to swine production worldwide. Evasion of host immunity by ASF virus (ASFV) is well understood. However, the role of ASFV in triggering oncogenesis is still unclear. In the present study, ASFV-infected kidney tissue samples were subjected to Illumina-based transcriptome analysis. A total of 2463 upregulated and 825 downregulated genes were differentially expressed (p < 0.05). A literature review revealed that the majority of the differentially expressed host genes were key molecules in signaling pathways involved in oncogenesis. Bioinformatic analysis indicated the activation of certain oncogenic KEGG pathways, including basal cell carcinoma, breast cancer, transcriptional deregulation in cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Analysis of host-virus interactions revealed that the upregulated oncogenic RELA (p65 transcription factor) protein of Sus scrofa can interact with the A238L (hypothetical protein of unknown function) of ASFV. Differential expression of oncogenes was confirmed by qRT-PCR, using the H3 histone family 3A gene (H3F3A) as an internal control to confirm the RNA-Seq data. The levels of gene expression indicated by qRT-PCR matched closely to those determined through RNA-Seq. These findings open up new possibilities for investigation of the mechanisms underlying ASFV infection and offer insights into the dynamic interaction between viral infection and oncogenic processes. However, as these investigations were conducted on pigs that died from natural ASFV infection, the role of ASFV in oncogenesis still needs to be investigated in controlled experimental studies.

Transcriptional Factors Mediated Reprogramming to Pluripotency

A unique kind of pluripotent cell, i.e., Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), now being targeted for iPSC synthesis, are produced by reprogramming animal and human differentiated cells (with no change in genetic makeup for the sake of high efficacy iPSCs formation). The conversion of specific cells to iPSCs has revolutionized stem cell research by making pluripotent cells more controllable for regenerative therapy. For the past 15 years, somatic cell reprogramming to pluripotency with force expression of specified factors has been a fascinating field of biomedical study. For that technological primary viewpoint reprogramming method, a cocktail of four transcription factors (TF) has required: Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), four-octamer binding protein 34 (OCT3/4), MYC and SOX2 (together referred to as OSKM) and host cells. IPS cells have great potential for future tissue replacement treatments because of their ability to self-renew and specialize in all adult cell types, although factor-mediated reprogramming mechanisms are still poorly understood medically. This technique has dramatically improved performance and efficiency, making it more useful in drug discovery, disease remodeling, and regenerative medicine. Moreover, in these four TF cocktails, more than 30 reprogramming combinations were proposed, but for reprogramming effectiveness, only a few numbers have been demonstrated for the somatic cells of humans and mice. Stoichiometry, a combination of reprogramming agents and chromatin remodeling compounds, impacts kinetics, quality, and efficiency in stem cell research.

Mechanistic insights into UHRF1‑mediated DNA methylation by structure‑based functional clarification of UHRF1 domains (Review)

Epigenetic modification is crucial for transmitting genetic information, while abnormalities in DNA methylation modification are primarily associated with cancer and neurological diseases. As a multifunctional epigenetic modifier, ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domains 1 (UHRF1) mainly affects cell energy metabolism and cell cycle control. It also inhibits the transcription of tumor suppressor genes through DNA and/or histone methylation modifications, promoting the occurrence and development of cancer. Therefore, comprehensively understanding the molecular mechanism of the epigenetic modification of UHRF1 in tumors will help identify targets for inhibiting the expression and function of UHRF1. Notably, each domain of UHRF1 functions as a whole and differently. Thus, the abnormality of any domain can lead to a change in phenotype or disease. However, the specific regulatory mechanism and proteins of each domain have not been fully elucidated. The present review aimed to contribute to the study of the regulatory mechanism of UHRF1 to a greater extent in different cancers and provide ideas for drug research by clarifying the function of UHRF1 domains.

Single-cell multi-omics sequencing of human spermatogenesis reveals a DNA demethylation event associated with male meiotic recombination

Human spermatogenesis is a highly ordered process; however, the roles of DNA methylation and chromatin accessibility in this process remain largely unknown. Here by simultaneously investigating the chromatin accessibility, DNA methylome and transcriptome landscapes using the modified single-cell chromatin overall omic-scale landscape sequencing approach, we revealed that the transcriptional changes throughout human spermatogenesis were correlated with chromatin accessibility changes. In particular, we identified a set of transcription factors and cis elements with potential functions. A round of DNA demethylation was uncovered upon meiosis initiation in human spermatogenesis, which was associated with male meiotic recombination and conserved between human and mouse. Aberrant DNA hypermethylation could be detected in leptotene spermatocytes of certain nonobstructive azoospermia patients. Functionally, the intervention of DNA demethylation affected male meiotic recombination and fertility. Our work provides multi-omics landscapes of human spermatogenesis at single-cell resolution and offers insights into the association between DNA demethylation and male meiotic recombination.

Methylation is maintained specifically at imprinting control regions but not other DMRs associated with imprinted genes in mice bearing a mutation in the Dnmt1 intrinsically disordered domain

Differential methylation of imprinting control regions in mammals is essential for distinguishing the parental alleles from each other and regulating their expression accordingly. To ensure parent of origin-specific expression of imprinted genes and thereby normal developmental progression, the differentially methylated states that are inherited at fertilization must be stably maintained by DNA methyltransferase 1 throughout subsequent somatic cell division. Further epigenetic modifications, such as the acquisition of secondary regions of differential methylation, are dependent on the methylation status of imprinting control regions and are important for achieving the monoallelic expression of imprinted genes, but little is known about how imprinting control regions direct the acquisition and maintenance of methylation at these secondary sites. Recent analysis has identified mutations that reduce DNA methyltransferase 1 fidelity at some genomic sequences but not at others, suggesting that it may function differently at different loci. We examined the impact of the mutant DNA methyltransferase 1 P allele on methylation at imprinting control regions as well as at secondary differentially methylated regions and non-imprinted sequences. We found that while the P allele results in a major reduction in DNA methylation levels across the mouse genome, methylation is specifically maintained at imprinting control regions but not at their corresponding secondary DMRs. This result suggests that DNA methyltransferase 1 may work differently at imprinting control regions or that there is an alternate mechanism for maintaining methylation at these critical regulatory regions and that maintenance of methylation at secondary DMRs is not solely dependent on the methylation status of the ICR.

Impaired Repopulating Ability of Uhrf2-/- Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells in Mice

UHRF proteins catalyze the ubiquitination of target proteins and are involved in regulating gene expression. Some studies reported a reduced expression of UHRF2 in acute leukemia cells, but the role of UHRF2 in hematopoiesis remains unknown. Here, we generated Uhrf2-/- mice to clarify the role of UHRF2 deletion in hematopoiesis. Compared to Uhrf2+/+ mice, Uhrf2-/- mice showed no differences in complete blood counts, as well as bone marrow (BM) findings and spleen weights. Proportions of cells in progenitor fractions in BM were comparable between Uhrf2+/+ mice and Uhrf2-/- mice. However, in competitive repopulation assays with BM transplants (BMT), the proportions of Uhrf2-/- cells were decreased relative to Uhrf2+/+ cells in all lineages. After the second BMT, Uhrf2-/- neutrophils were few, while 20-30% of Uhrf2-/- T cells and B cells were still detected. RNA sequencing showed downregulation of some genes associated with stem-cell function in Uhrf2-/- hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Interestingly, trimethylated histone H3 lysine 9 was increased in Uhrf2-/- HSPCs in a cleavage under targets and tagmentation assay. While UHRF2 deletion did not cause hematologic malignancy or confer a growth advantage of HSPCs, our results suggest that UHRF2 may play a role in the regulation of hematopoiesis.

Inhibitors of UHRF1 base flipping activity showing cytotoxicity against cancer cells

Ubiquitin-like containing PHD and RING finger domain 1 (UHRF1) is a nuclear multi-domain protein overexpressed in numerous human cancer types. We previously disclosed the anthraquinone derivative UM63 that inhibits UHRF1-SRA domain base-flipping activity, although having DNA intercalating properties. Herein, based on the UM63 structure, new UHRF1-SRA inhibitors were identified through a multidisciplinary approach, combining molecular modelling, biophysical assays, molecular and cell biology experiments. We identified AMSA2 and MPB7, that inhibit UHRF1-SRA mediated base flipping at low micromolar concentrations, but do not intercalate into DNA, which is a key advantage over UM63. These molecules prevent UHRF1/DNMT1 interaction at replication forks and decrease the overall DNA methylation in cells. Moreover, both compounds specifically induce cell death in numerous cancer cell lines, displaying marginal effect on non-cancer cells, as they preferentially affect cells with high level of UHRF1. Overall, these two compounds are promising leads for the development of anti-cancer drugs targeting UHRF1.

Mechanisms of DNA methylation and histone modifications

The field of genetics has expanded a lot in the past few decades due to the accessibility of human genome sequences, but still, the regulation of transcription cannot be explicated exclusively by the sequence of DNA of an individual. The coordination and crosstalk between chromatin factors which are conserved is indispensable for all living creatures. The regulation of gene expression has been dependent on the methylation of DNA, post-translational modifications of histones, effector proteins, chromatin remodeler enzymes that affect the chromatin structure and function, and other cellular activities such as DNA replication, DNA repair, proliferation and growth. The mutation and deletion of these factors can lead to human diseases. Various studies are being performed to identify and understand the gene regulatory mechanisms in the diseased state. The information from these high throughput screening studies is able to aid the treatment developments based on the epigenetics regulatory mechanisms. This book chapter will discourse on various modifications and their mechanisms that take place on histones and DNA that regulate the transcription of genes.

Novel UHRF1-MYC Axis in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING finger domain, (UHRF) family members are overexpressed putative oncogenes in several cancer types. We evaluated the protein abundance of UHRF family members in acute leukemia. A marked overexpression of UHRF1 protein was observed in ALL compared with AML. An analysis of human leukemia transcriptomic datasets revealed concordant overexpression of UHRF1 in B-Cell and T-Cell ALL compared with CLL, AML, and CML. In-vitro studies demonstrated reduced cell viability with siRNA-mediated knockdown of UHRF1 in both B-ALL and T-ALL, associated with reduced c-Myc protein expression. Mechanistic studies indicated that UHRF1 directly interacts with c-Myc, enabling ALL expansion via the CDK4/6-phosphoRb axis. Our findings highlight a previously unknown role of UHRF1 in regulating c-Myc protein expression and implicate UHRF1 as a potential therapeutic target in ALL.

Structural-Guided Identification of Small Molecule Inhibitor of UHRF1 Methyltransferase Activity

Ubiquitin-like containing plant homeodomain Ring Finger 1 (UHRF1) protein is recognized as a cell-cycle-regulated multidomain protein. UHRF1 importantly manifests the maintenance of DNA methylation mediated by the interaction between its SRA (SET and RING associated) domain and DNA methyltransferase-1 (DNMT1)-like epigenetic modulators. However, overexpression of UHRF1 epigenetically responds to the aberrant global methylation and promotes tumorigenesis. To date, no potential molecular inhibitor has been studied against the SRA domain. Therefore, this study focused on identifying the active natural drug-like candidates against the SRA domain. A comprehensive set of in silico approaches including molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, and toxicity analysis was performed to identify potential candidates. A dataset of 709 natural compounds was screened through molecular docking where chicoric acid and nystose have been found showing higher binding affinities to the SRA domain. The MD simulations also showed the protein ligand interaction stability of and in silico toxicity analysis has also showed chicoric acid as a safe and nontoxic drug. In addition, chicoric acid possessed a longer interaction time and higher LD50 of 5000 mg/kg. Moreover, the global methylation level (%5 mC) has been assessed after chicoric acid treatment was in the colorectal cancer cell line (HCT116) at different doses. The result showed that 7.5 µM chicoric acid treatment reduced methylation levels significantly. Thus, the study found chicoric acid can become a possible epidrug-like inhibitor against the SRA domain of UHRF1 protein.

Dppa3 facilitates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells by stabilization of pluripotent factors

BACKGROUND

Developmental pluripotency-associated 3 (Dppa3, also called Stella or PGC7) is a principal maternal protein specially expressed in pre-implantation embryos, embryonic stem cells (ES cells) and primordial germ cells (PGCs). It plays critical role in the regulating of DNA methylation in zygotes and oocytes. However, the effect of Dppa3 in ES cells on the stability of proteins is still unclear.

METHODS

In this study, we first identified the potential interacting proteins with Dppa3 using immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry (IP-MS). After GO analysis, we further constructed Dppa3-silenced ES cells and ES cell lines overexpressing with different lengths of Dppa3 to explore the mechanisms of Dppa3 on protein stability.

RESULTS

IP-MS results showed that Dppa3 interacted with quite a few subunits of 26S proteasome. Full length of Dppa3 stabilized Uhrf1 and Nanog by inhibiting its degradation. Silencing Dppa3 promoted degradation of Nanog protein.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that Dppa3 safeguard the stability of Uhrf1 and Nanog by inhibiting proteasome-associated degradation in ES cells. These findings shed light on new function of Dppa3 in maintaining stability of proteins and provides a valuable resource for understanding the roles of Dppa3 in embryonic stem cells.

UHRF2 regulates cell cycle, epigenetics and gene expression to control the timing of retinal progenitor and ganglion cell differentiation

Ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING finger domains 2 (UHRF2) regulates cell cycle and binds 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) to promote completion of DNA demethylation. Uhrf2-/- mice are without gross phenotypic defects; however, the cell cycle and epigenetic regulatory functions of Uhrf2 during retinal tissue development are unclear. Retinal progenitor cells (RPCs) produce all retinal neurons and Müller glia in a predictable sequence controlled by the complex interplay between extrinsic signaling, cell cycle, epigenetic changes and cell-specific transcription factor activation. In this study, we find that UHRF2 accumulates in RPCs, and its conditional deletion from mouse RPCs reduced 5hmC, altered gene expressions and disrupted retinal cell proliferation and differentiation. Retinal ganglion cells were overproduced in Uhrf2-deficient retinae at the expense of VSX2+ RPCs. Most other cell types were transiently delayed in differentiation. Expression of each member of the Tet3/Uhrf2/Tdg active demethylation pathway was reduced in Uhrf2-deficient retinae, consistent with locally reduced 5hmC in their gene bodies. This study highlights a novel role of UHRF2 in controlling the transition from RPCs to differentiated cell by regulating cell cycle, epigenetic and gene expression decisions.

Common mechanisms cannot explain time- and dose-dependent DNA methylation changes in earthworms exposed to cadmium

DNA hypermethylation caused by environmental pollutants like cadmium (Cd) has already been demonstrated in many invertebrates, including earthworms. However, the exact epigenetic mechanisms that drive this hypermethylation are largely unknown and even basic DNA methylation and demethylation processes are hardly characterized. Therefore, we used an important bioindicator, the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris, as a model organism to determine time- and dose-dependent effects of Cd on global and gene-specific DNA methylation and its underlying mechanisms. We revealed Cd-induced adenine and cytosine hypermethylation using specific antibodies in dot blots and found that the methylation level of adenine compared to cytosine changed even to a bigger extent. However, the levels of hydroxymethylated cytosine did not differ between treatment groups. General methylation and demethylation components like methyltransferases (DNMT1 and 3), and ten-eleven translocation (TET) genes were confirmed in L. terrestris by quantitative RealTime PCR. However, neither gene expression, nor DNMT and TET enzyme activity showed significant differences in the Cd exposure groups. Using bisulfite conversion and sequencing, gene body methylation (gbm) of metallothionein 2 (MT2), one of the most important detoxification proteins, was characterized. Cd-dependent changes in MT2 gbm could, however, not be correlated to MT2 gene activity evaluated by quantitative RealTime PCR. Future directions as well as missing links are discussed in the present study hinting towards the importance of studying epigenetic marks and mechanistic insights in a broad variety of species to deepen our knowledge on the effects of changing environmental conditions.

Molecular investigation of the tandem Tudor domain and plant homeodomain histone binding domains of the epigenetic regulator UHRF2

Ubiquitin-like containing PHD and ring finger (UHRF)1 and UHRF2 are multidomain epigenetic proteins that play a critical role in bridging crosstalk between histone modifications and DNA methylation. Both proteins contain two histone reader domains, called tandem Tudor domain (TTD) and plant homeodomain (PHD), which read the modification status on histone H3 to regulate DNA methylation and gene expression. To shed light on the mechanism of histone binding by UHRF2, we have undergone a detailed molecular investigation with the TTD, PHD and TTD-PHD domains and compared the binding activity to its UHRF1 counterpart. We found that unlike UHRF1 where the PHD is the primary binding contributor, the TTD of UHRF2 has modestly higher affinity toward the H3 tail, while the PHD has a weaker binding interaction. We also demonstrated that like UHRF1, the aromatic amino acids within the TTD are important for binding to H3K9me3 and a conserved aspartic acid within the PHD forms an ionic interaction with R2 of H3. However, while the aromatic amino acids in the TTD of UHRF1 contribute to selectivity, the analogous residues in UHRF2 contribute to both selectivity and affinity. We also discovered that the PHD of UHRF2 contains a distinct asparagine in the H3R2 binding pocket that lowers the binding affinity of the PHD by reducing a potential electrostatic interaction with the H3 tail. Furthermore, we demonstrate the PHD and TTD of UHRF2 cooperate to interact with the H3 tail and that dual domain engagement with the H3 tail relies on specific amino acids. Lastly, our data indicate that the unique stretch region in the TTD of UHRF2 can decrease the melting temperature of the TTD-PHD and represents a disordered region. Thus, these subtle but important mechanistic differences are potential avenues for selectively targeting the histone binding interactions of UHRF1 and UHRF2 with small molecules.

High-Throughput-Methyl-Reading (HTMR) assay: a solution based on nucleotide methyl-binding proteins enables large-scale screening for DNA/RNA methyltransferases and demethylases

Epigenetic therapy has significant potential for cancer treatment. However, few small potent molecules have been identified against DNA or RNA modification regulatory proteins. Current approaches for activity detection of DNA/RNA methyltransferases and demethylases are time-consuming and labor-intensive, making it difficult to subject them to high-throughput screening. Here, we developed a fluorescence polarization-based ‘High-Throughput Methyl Reading’ (HTMR) assay to implement large-scale compound screening for DNA/RNA methyltransferases and demethylases-DNMTs, TETs, ALKBH5 and METTL3/METTL14. This assay is simple to perform in a mix-and-read manner by adding the methyl-binding proteins MBD1 or YTHDF1. The proteins can be used to distinguish FAM-labelled substrates or product oligonucleotides with different methylation statuses catalyzed by enzymes. Therefore, the extent of the enzymatic reactions can be coupled with the variation of FP binding signals. Furthermore, this assay can be effectively used to conduct a cofactor competition study. Based on the assay, we identified two natural products as candidate compounds for DNMT1 and ALKBH5. In summary, this study outlines a powerful homogeneous approach for high-throughput screening and evaluating enzymatic activity for DNA/RNA methyltransferases and demethylases that is cheap, easy, quick, and highly sensitive.

Evolution of CG Methylation Maintenance Machinery in Plants

Cytosine methylation is an epigenetic mark present in most eukaryotic genomes that contributes to the regulation of gene expression and the maintenance of genome stability. DNA methylation mostly occurs at CG sequences, where it is initially deposited by de novo DNA methyltransferases and propagated by maintenance DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) during DNA replication. In this review, we first summarize the mechanisms maintaining CG methylation in mammals that involve the DNA Methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) enzyme and its cofactor, UHRF1 (Ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING Finger domain 1). We then discuss the evolutionary conservation and diversification of these two core factors in the plant kingdom and speculate on potential functions of novel homologues typically observed in land plants but not in mammals.

Mutation-induced DNMT1 cleavage drives neurodegenerative disease

Specific mutations within the replication foci targeting sequence (RFTS) domain of human DNMT1 are causative of two types of adult-onset neurodegenerative diseases, HSAN1E and ADCA-DN, but the underlying mechanisms are largely unknown. We generated Dnmt1-M1 and Dnmt1-M2 knock-in mouse models that are equivalent to Y495C and D490E-P491Y mutation in patients with HSAN1E, respectively. We found that both mutant heterozygous mice are viable, have reduced DNMT1 proteins, and exhibit neurodegenerative phenotypes including impaired learning and memory. The homozygous mutants die around embryonic day 10.5 and are apparently devoid of DNMT1 proteins. We present the evidence that the mutant DNMT1 proteins are unstable, most likely because of cleavage within RFTS domain by an unidentified proteinase. Moreover, we provide evidence that the RFTS mutation–induced cleavage of DNMT1, but not mutation itself, is responsible for functional defect of mutant DNMT1. Our study shed light on the mechanism of DNMT1 RFTS mutation causing neurodegenerative diseases.

UHRF2 commissions the completion of DNA demethylation through allosteric activation by 5hmC and K33-linked ubiquitination of XRCC1

The transition of oxidized 5-methylcytosine (5mC) intermediates into the base excision repair (BER) pipeline to complete DNA demethylation remains enigmatic. We report here that UHRF2, the only paralog of UHRF1 in mammals that fails to rescue Uhrf1^-/- phenotype, is physically and functionally associated with BER complex. We show that UHRF2 is allosterically activated by 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) and acts as a ubiquitin E3 ligase to catalyze K33-linked polyubiquitination of XRCC1. This nonproteolytic action stimulates XRCC1's interaction with the ubiquitin binding domain-bearing RAD23B, leading to the incorporation of TDG into BER complex. Integrative epigenomic analysis in mouse embryonic stem cells reveals that Uhrf2-fostered TDG-RAD23B-BER complex is functionally linked to the completion of DNA demethylation at active promoters and that Uhrf2 ablation impedes DNA demethylation on latent enhancers that undergo poised-to-active transition during neuronal commitment. Together, these observations highlight an essentiality of 5hmC-switched UHRF2 E3 ligase activity in commissioning the accomplishment of active DNA demethylation.

Acetylation of UHRF1 Regulates Hemi-methylated DNA Binding and Maintenance of Genome-wide DNA Methylation

UHRF1 is a key regulator in DNA methylation maintenance. It binds histone H3K9me2/3 and hemi-methylated DNA and recruits DNMT1 to DNA replication forks during S phase. However, the regulatory mechanism of hemi-methylated DNA binding activity of UHRF1 remains unknown. In this study, we reveal that acetylation of UHRF1 is regulated by PCAF and HDAC1. We show that UHRF1 acetylation at K490 attenuates its binding affinity to hemi-methylated DNA. We analyze genome-wide DNA methylation and gene-expression patterns using stable cell lines and discover that cells where the endogenous UHRF1 is replaced with an acetyl-mimetic (UHRF1 K490Q) mutant show deficiencies in inherited DNA methylation and show different gene-expression patterns in genes related to cell survival. These results reveal that precise regulation of UHRF1 acetylation is required to maintain DNA methylation during cell division and control cell survival.

UV-induced activation of ATR is mediated by UHRF2

UHRF1 (Ubiquitin-like with PHD and ring finger domains 1) regulates DNA methylation and histone modifications and plays a key role in cell proliferation and the DNA damage response. However, the function of UHRF2, a paralog of UHRF1, in the DNA damage response remains largely unknown. Here, we show that UHRF2 is essential for maintaining cell viability after UV irradiation, as well as for the proliferation of cancer cells. UHRF2 was found to physically interact with ATR in a DNA damage-dependent manner through UHRF2's TTD domain. In addition, phosphorylation of threonine at position 1989, which is required for UV-induced activation of ATR, was impaired in cells depleted of UHRF2, suggesting that UHRF2 is essential in ATR activation. In conclusion, these results suggest a new regulatory mechanism of ATR activation mediated by UHRF2.

Association of expression of epigenetic molecular factors with DNA methylation and sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents in cancer cell lines

BACKGROUND

Altered DNA methylation patterns play important roles in cancer development and progression. We examined whether expression levels of genes directly or indirectly involved in DNA methylation and demethylation may be associated with response of cancer cell lines to chemotherapy treatment with a variety of antitumor agents.

RESULTS

We analyzed 72 genes encoding epigenetic factors directly or indirectly involved in DNA methylation and demethylation processes. We examined association of their pretreatment expression levels with methylation beta-values of individual DNA methylation probes, DNA methylation averaged within gene regions, and average epigenome-wide methylation levels. We analyzed data from 645 cancer cell lines and 23 cancer types from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer datasets. We observed numerous correlations between expression of genes encoding epigenetic factors and response to chemotherapeutic agents. Expression of genes encoding a variety of epigenetic factors, including KDM2B, DNMT1, EHMT2, SETDB1, EZH2, APOBEC3G, and other genes, was correlated with response to multiple agents. DNA methylation of numerous target probes and gene regions was associated with expression of multiple genes encoding epigenetic factors, underscoring complex regulation of epigenome methylation by multiple intersecting molecular pathways. The genes whose expression was associated with methylation of multiple epigenome targets encode DNA methyltransferases, TET DNA methylcytosine dioxygenases, the methylated DNA-binding protein ZBTB38, KDM2B, SETDB1, and other molecular factors which are involved in diverse epigenetic processes affecting DNA methylation. While baseline DNA methylation of numerous epigenome targets was correlated with cell line response to antitumor agents, the complex relationships between the overlapping effects of each epigenetic factor on methylation of specific targets and the importance of such influences in tumor response to individual agents require further investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of multiple genes encoding epigenetic factors is associated with drug response and with DNA methylation of numerous epigenome targets that may affect response to therapeutic agents. Our findings suggest complex and interconnected pathways regulating DNA methylation in the epigenome, which may both directly and indirectly affect response to chemotherapy.

Maintenance DNA methylation is essential for regulatory T cell development and stability of suppressive function

Tregs require Foxp3 expression and induction of a specific DNA hypomethylation signature during development, after which Tregs persist as a self-renewing population that regulates immune system activation. Whether maintenance DNA methylation is required for Treg lineage development and stability and how methylation patterns are maintained during lineage self-renewal remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that the epigenetic regulator ubiquitin-like with plant homeodomain and RING finger domains 1 (Uhrf1) is essential for maintenance of methyl-DNA marks that stabilize Treg cellular identity by repressing effector T cell transcriptional programs. Constitutive and induced deficiency of Uhrf1 within Foxp3+ cells resulted in global yet nonuniform loss of DNA methylation, derepression of inflammatory transcriptional programs, destabilization of the Treg lineage, and spontaneous inflammation. These findings support a paradigm in which maintenance DNA methylation is required in distinct regions of the Treg genome for both lineage establishment and stability of identity and suppressive function.

Discovery of small molecules targeting the tandem tudor domain of the epigenetic factor UHRF1 using fragment-based ligand discovery

Despite the established roles of the epigenetic factor UHRF1 in oncogenesis, no UHRF1-targeting therapeutics have been reported to date. In this study, we use fragment-based ligand discovery to identify novel scaffolds for targeting the isolated UHRF1 tandem Tudor domain (TTD), which recognizes the heterochromatin-associated histone mark H3K9me3 and supports intramolecular contacts with other regions of UHRF1. Using both binding-based and function-based screens of a ~ 2300-fragment library in parallel, we identified 2,4-lutidine as a hit for follow-up NMR and X-ray crystallography studies. Unlike previous reported ligands, 2,4-lutidine binds to two binding pockets that are in close proximity on TTD and so has the potential to be evolved into more potent inhibitors using a fragment-linking strategy. Our study provides a useful starting point for developing potent chemical probes against UHRF1.

A role for LSH in facilitating DNA methylation by DNMT1 through enhancing UHRF1 chromatin association

LSH, a SNF2 family DNA helicase, is a key regulator of DNA methylation in mammals. How LSH facilitates DNA methylation is not well defined. While previous studies with mouse embryonic stem cells (mESc) and fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from Lsh knockout mice have revealed a role of Lsh in de novo DNA methylation by Dnmt3a/3b, here we report that LSH contributes to DNA methylation in various cell lines primarily by promoting DNA methylation by DNMT1. We show that loss of LSH has a much bigger effect in DNA methylation than loss of DNMT3A and DNMT3B. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that LSH interacts with UHRF1 but not DNMT1 and facilitates UHRF1 chromatin association and UHRF1-catalyzed histone H3 ubiquitination in an ATPase activity-dependent manner, which in turn promotes DNMT1 recruitment to replication fork and DNA methylation. Notably, UHRF1 also enhances LSH association with the replication fork. Thus, our study identifies LSH as an essential factor for DNA methylation by DNMT1 and provides novel insight into how a feed-forward loop between LSH and UHRF1 facilitates DNMT1-mediated maintenance of DNA methylation in chromatin.

Ubiquitin-Specific-Processing Protease 7 Regulates Female Germline Stem Cell Self-Renewal Through DNA Methylation

Ubiquitin-specific-processing protease 7 (Usp7) is a key deubiquitinase controlling epigenetic modification and regulating the self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation of stem cells. However, the functions and mechanisms of action of Usp7 on female germline stem cells (FGSCs) are unknown. Here, we demonstrated that Usp7 regulated FGSC self-renewal via DNA methylation. The results of Cell Counting Kit-8 and 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine assays showed that the viability and proliferation of FGSCs were negatively regulated by Usp7. Moreover, Usp7 downregulated the expression of self-renewal genes, such as Oct4, Etv5, Foxo1, and Akt, but upregulated the expression of differentiation-related genes including Stra8 and Sycp3. Mechanistically, RNA-seq results showed that Usp7 negatively regulated FGSC self-renewal but positively modulated differentiation in FGSCs. Meanwhile, both overexpression and knockdown of Usp7 resulted in significant changes in DNA methylation and histone modification in FGSCs. Additionally, RNA-seq and MeDIP-seq analyses showed that Usp7 regulates the self-renewal and differentiation of FGSCs mainly through DNA methylation rather than histone modification, which was also confirmed by a rescue assay. Our study not only offers a novel method to research FGSC self-renewal and differentiation in view of epigenetic modifications, but also provides a deep understanding of FGSC development.

UHRF1 Knockdown Attenuates Cell Growth, Migration, and Invasion in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Ubiquitin like with PHD and ring finger domains 1 (UHRF1) contributes to the progression of many cancers. Here, we firstly observed UHRF1 was elevated in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and related to the differentiation stages. Knockdown of UHRF1 in A431 and Scl-1 attenuated cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, leading to G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Through a mouse xenograft model, we found UHRF1 deficiency ameliorated tumor growth. These results may be associated with destruction of multiple signal pathways. In summary, our results suggest UHRF1 is involved in the pathogenesis of cSCC and may be a therapeutic target.

The histone and non-histone methyllysine reader activities of the UHRF1 tandem Tudor domain are dispensable for the propagation of aberrant DNA methylation patterning in cancer cells

The chromatin-binding E3 ubiquitin ligase ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING finger domains 1 (UHRF1) contributes to the maintenance of aberrant DNA methylation patterning in cancer cells through multivalent histone and DNA recognition. The tandem Tudor domain (TTD) of UHRF1 is well-characterized as a reader of lysine 9 di- and tri-methylation on histone H3 (H3K9me2/me3) and, more recently, lysine 126 di- and tri-methylation on DNA ligase 1 (LIG1K126me2/me3). However, the functional significance and selectivity of these interactions remain unclear. In this study, we used protein domain microarrays to search for additional readers of LIG1K126me2, the preferred methyl state bound by the UHRF1 TTD. We show that the UHRF1 TTD binds LIG1K126me2 with high affinity and selectivity compared to other known methyllysine readers. Notably, and unlike H3K9me2/me3, the UHRF1 plant homeodomain (PHD) and its N-terminal linker (L2) do not contribute to multivalent LIG1K126me2 recognition along with the TTD. To test the functional significance of this interaction, we designed a LIG1K126me2 cell-penetrating peptide (CPP). Consistent with LIG1 knockdown, uptake of the CPP had no significant effect on the propagation of DNA methylation patterning across the genomes of bulk populations from high-resolution analysis of several cancer cell lines. Further, we did not detect significant changes in DNA methylation patterning from bulk cell populations after chemical or genetic disruption of lysine methyltransferase activity associated with LIG1K126me2 and H3K9me2. Collectively, these studies identify UHRF1 as a selective reader of LIG1K126me2 in vitro and further implicate the histone and non-histone methyllysine reader activity of the UHRF1 TTD as a dispensable domain function for cancer cell DNA methylation maintenance.

Crystal structure of the EcoKMcrA N-terminal domain (NEco): recognition of modified cytosine bases without flipping

EcoKMcrA from Escherichia coli restricts CpG methylated or hydroxymethylated DNA, and may act as a barrier against host DNA. The enzyme consists of a novel N-terminal specificity domain that we term NEco, and a C-terminal catalytic HNH domain. Here, we report that NEco and full-length EcoKMcrA specificities are consistent. NEco affinity to DNA increases more from hemi- to full-methylation than from non- to hemi-methylation, indicating cooperative binding of the methyl groups. We determined the crystal structures of NEco in complex with fully modified DNA containing three variants of the Y^5mCGR EcoKMcrA target sequence: C^5mCGG, T^5mCGA and T^5hmCGA. The structures explain the specificity for the two central base pairs and one of the flanking pairs. As predicted based on earlier biochemical experiments, NEco does not flip any DNA bases. The proximal and distal methyl groups are accommodated in separate pockets. Changes to either pocket reduce DNA binding by NEco and restriction by EcoKMcrA, confirming the relevance of the crystallographically observed binding mode in solution.

UHRF2 promotes intestinal tumorigenesis through stabilization of TCF4 mediated Wnt/β-catenin signaling

Intestinal tumors mainly originate from transformed crypt stem cells supported by Wnt signaling, which functions through downstream critical factors enriched in the intestinal stem/progenitor compartment. Here, we show Uhrf2 is predominantly expressed in intestinal crypts and adenomas in mice and is transcriptionally regulated by Wnt signaling. Upregulated UHRF2 correlates with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Although loss of Uhrf2 did not affect intestinal homeostasis and regeneration, tumor initiation and progression were inhibited, leading to a markedly prolonged life span in Uhrf2 null mice on an Apc^Min background. Uhrf2 deficiency also strongly reduced primary tumor organoid formation suggesting impairment of tumor stem cells. Moreover, ablation of Uhrf2 suppressed tumor cell proliferation through downregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Mechanistically, Uhrf2 directly interacts with and sumoylates Tcf4, a critical intranuclear effector of the Wnt pathway. Uhrf2 mediated SUMOylation stabilized Tcf4 and further sustained hyperactive Wnt signaling. Together, we demonstrate that Wnt-induced Uhrf2 expression promotes tumorigenesis through modulation of the stability of Tcf4 for maintaining oncogenic Wnt/β-catenin signaling. This is a new reciprocal feedforward regulation between Uhrf2 and Wnt signaling in tumor initiation and progression.

UHRF1, a Regulator of Methylation, as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Marker for Lung Cancer

We evaluated the value of UHRF1, a regulator of methylation, as a biomarker for lung cancer. UHRF1 is expressed at higher levels in both lung adenocarcinoma (AD) and squamous cell carcinoma (SQ); however, a meta-analysis showed that UHRF1 expression is correlated with worse survival in patients with AD but not in those with SQ. UHRF1 knockdown suppressed the growth of lung cancer cell lines through G1 cell cycle arrest in some cell lines. These results suggest that UHRF1 may server as a diagnostic marker for AD and SQ and as a prognostic marker for AD in lung cancer.

Association of UHRF1 gene polymorphisms with oligospermia in Chinese males

BACKGROUND

UHRF1 plays an important role in maintaining DNA methylation patterns during spermatogenesis. This study was performed to evaluate the association between UHRF1 gene variations and infertility in males with oligozoospermia in a Chinese population.

METHODS

In this case-control study of 735 Chinese men, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes and alleles in the UHRF1 gene were assessed by direct sequencing. The effects of the mutations on UHRF1 transcription were investigated using a dual-luciferase reporter gene assay.

RESULTS

We identified 24 SNPs, including nine SNPs in the promoter region, three in the 5' untranslated region, five in introns, and seven in exons. Interestingly, the genotype frequencies of SNP rs2656927 (P = 0.014) and rs8103849 (P < 0.001) significantly differed between men with oligozoospermia in case group 1 and normozoospermic men. Moreover, four variants (three were novel) were detected only in the patient group, with two in introns and the others in the promoter region. The results of the luciferase assay showed that the -1615C>T-C and -1562A>G-A alleles increased luciferase activity compared with the -1615C>T-T and -1562A>G-G alleles.

CONCLUSIONS

We detected two SNPs in the UHRF1 gene showing a significant difference between the case and control groups. Two screened SNPs affected UHRF1 promoter activity, improving the understanding of the pathophysiology of oligozoospermia.

Hemimethylation of CpG dyads is characteristic of secondary DMRs associated with imprinted loci and correlates with 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at paternally methylated sequences

BACKGROUND

In mammals, the regulation of imprinted genes is controlled by differential methylation at imprinting control regions which acquire parent of origin-specific methylation patterns during gametogenesis and retain differences in allelic methylation status throughout fertilization and subsequent somatic cell divisions. In addition, many imprinted genes acquire differential methylation during post-implantation development; these secondary differentially methylated regions appear necessary to maintain the imprinted expression state of individual genes. Despite the requirement for both types of differentially methylated sequence elements to achieve proper expression across imprinting clusters, methylation patterns are more labile at secondary differentially methylated regions. To understand the nature of this variability, we analyzed CpG dyad methylation patterns at both paternally and maternally methylated imprinted loci within multiple imprinting clusters.

RESULTS

We determined that both paternally and maternally methylated secondary differentially methylated regions associated with imprinted genes display high levels of hemimethylation, 29-49%, in comparison to imprinting control regions which exhibited 8-12% hemimethylation. To explore how hemimethylation could arise, we assessed the differentially methylated regions for the presence of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which could cause methylation to be lost via either passive and/or active demethylation mechanisms. We found enrichment of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at paternally methylated secondary differentially methylated regions, but not at the maternally methylated sites we analyzed in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

We found high levels of hemimethylation to be a generalizable characteristic of secondary differentially methylated regions associated with imprinted genes. We propose that 5-hydroxymethylcytosine enrichment may be responsible for the variability in methylation status at paternally methylated secondary differentially methylated regions associated with imprinted genes. We further suggest that the high incidence of hemimethylation at secondary differentially methylated regions must be counteracted by continuous methylation acquisition at these loci.

SET8 prevents excessive DNA methylation by methylation-mediated degradation of UHRF1 and DNMT1

Faithful inheritance of DNA methylation across cell division requires DNMT1 and its accessory factor UHRF1. However, how this axis is regulated to ensure DNA methylation homeostasis remains poorly understood. Here we show that SET8, a cell-cycle-regulated protein methyltransferase, controls protein stability of both UHRF1 and DNMT1 through methylation-mediated, ubiquitin-dependent degradation and consequently prevents excessive DNA methylation. SET8 methylates UHRF1 at lysine 385 and this modification leads to ubiquitination and degradation of UHRF1. In contrast, LSD1 stabilizes both UHRF1 and DNMT1 by demethylation. Importantly, SET8 and LSD1 oppositely regulate global DNA methylation and do so most likely through regulating the level of UHRF1 than DNMT1. Finally, we show that UHRF1 downregulation in G2/M by SET8 has a role in suppressing DNMT1-mediated methylation on post-replicated DNA. Altogether, our study reveals a novel role of SET8 in promoting DNA methylation homeostasis and identifies UHRF1 as the hub for tuning DNA methylation through dynamic protein methylation.

A Molecular Tool Targeting the Base-Flipping Activity of Human UHRF1

During DNA replication, ubiquitin-like, containing PHD and RING fingers domains 1 (UHRF1) plays key roles in the inheritance of methylation patterns to daughter strands by recognizing through its SET and RING-associated domain (SRA) the methylated CpGs and recruiting DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). Herein, our goal is to identify UHRF1 inhibitors targeting the 5'-methylcytosine (5mC) binding pocket of the SRA domain to prevent the recognition and flipping of 5mC and determine the molecular and cellular consequences of this inhibition. For this, we used a multidisciplinary strategy combining virtual screening and molecular modeling with biophysical assays in solution and cells. We identified an anthraquinone compound able to bind to the 5mC binding pocket and inhibit the base-flipping process in the low micromolar range. We also showed in cells that this hit impaired the UHRF1/DNMT1 interaction and decreased the overall methylation of DNA, highlighting the critical role of base flipping for DNMT1 recruitment and providing the first proof of concept of the druggability of the 5mC binding pocket. The selected anthraquinone appears thus as a key tool to investigate the role of UHRF1 in the inheritance of methylation patterns, as well as a starting point for hit-to-lead optimizations.

The finger loop of the SRA domain in the E3 ligase UHRF1 is a regulator of ubiquitin targeting and is required for the maintenance of DNA methylation

The Su(var)3–9, enhancer of zeste, and trithorax (SET) and really interesting new gene (RING) finger–associated (SRA) protein domain is conserved across bacteria and eukaryota and coordinates extrahelical or “flipped” DNA bases. A functional SRA domain is required for ubiquitin-like with PHD and RING finger domains 1 (UHRF1) E3 ubiquitin ligase activity toward histone H3, a mechanism for recruiting the DNA methylation maintenance enzyme DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1). The SRA domain supports UHRF1 oncogenic activity in colon cancer cells, highlighting that UHRF1 SRA antagonism could be a cancer therapeutic strategy. Here we used molecular dynamics simulations, DNA binding assays, in vitro ubiquitination reactions, and DNA methylation analysis to identify the SRA finger loop as a regulator of UHRF1 ubiquitin targeting and DNA methylation maintenance. A chimeric UHRF1 (finger swap) with diminished E3 ligase activity toward nucleosomal histones, despite tighter binding to unmodified or asymmetric or symmetrically methylated DNA, uncouples DNA affinity from regulation of E3 ligase activity. Our model suggests that SRA domains sample DNA bases through flipping in the presence or absence of a cytosine modification and that specific interactions of the SRA finger loop with DNA are required for downstream host protein function. Our findings provide insight into allosteric regulation of UHRF1 E3 ligase activity, suggesting that UHRF1's SRA finger loop regulates its conformation and function.

Comparative biochemical analysis of UHRF proteins reveals molecular mechanisms that uncouple UHRF2 from DNA methylation maintenance

UHRF1 is a histone- and DNA-binding E3 ubiquitin ligase that functions with DNMT1 to maintain mammalian DNA methylation. UHRF1 facilitates DNMT1 recruitment to replicating chromatin through a coordinated mechanism involving histone and DNA recognition and histone ubiquitination. UHRF2 shares structural homology with UHRF1, but surprisingly lacks functional redundancy to facilitate DNA methylation maintenance. Molecular mechanisms uncoupling UHRF2 from DNA methylation maintenance are poorly defined. Through comprehensive and comparative biochemical analysis of recombinant human UHRF1 and UHRF2 reader and writer activities, we reveal conserved modes of histone PTM recognition but divergent DNA binding properties. While UHRF1 and UHRF2 diverge in their affinities toward hemi-methylated DNA, we surprisingly show that both hemi-methylated and hemi-hydroxymethylated DNA oligonucleotides stimulate UHRF2 ubiquitin ligase activity toward histone H3 peptide substrates. This is the first example of an E3 ligase allosterically regulated by DNA hydroxymethylation. However, UHRF2 is not a productive histone E3 ligase toward purified mononucleosomes, suggesting UHRF2 has an intra-domain architecture distinct from UHRF1 that is conformationally constrained when bound to chromatin. Collectively, our studies reveal that uncoupling of UHRF2 from the DNA methylation maintenance program is linked to differences in the molecular readout of chromatin signatures that connect UHRF1 to ubiquitination of histone H3.

DNA Methylation Readers and Cancer: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Applications

DNA methylation is a major epigenetic process that regulates chromatin structure which causes transcriptional activation or repression of genes in a context-dependent manner. In general, DNA methylation takes place when methyl groups are added to the appropriate bases on the genome by the action of "writer" molecules known as DNA methyltransferases. How these methylation marks are read and interpreted into different functionalities represents one of the main mechanisms through which the genes are switched "ON" or "OFF" and typically involves different types of "reader" proteins that can recognize and bind to the methylated regions. A tightly balanced regulation exists between the "writers" and "readers" in order to mediate normal cellular functions. However, alterations in normal methylation pattern is a typical hallmark of cancer which alters the way methylation marks are written, read and interpreted in different disease states. This unique characteristic of DNA methylation "readers" has identified them as attractive therapeutic targets. In this review, we describe the current state of knowledge on the different classes of DNA methylation "readers" identified thus far along with their normal biological functions, describe how they are dysregulated in cancer, and discuss the various anti-cancer therapies that are currently being developed and evaluated for targeting these proteins.

Defining UHRF1 Domains that Support Maintenance of Human Colon Cancer DNA Methylation and Oncogenic Properties

UHRF1 facilitates the establishment and maintenance of DNA methylation patterns in mammalian cells. The establishment domains are defined, including E3 ligase function, but the maintenance domains are poorly characterized. Here, we demonstrate that UHRF1 histone- and hemimethylated DNA binding functions, but not E3 ligase activity, maintain cancer-specific DNA methylation in human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Disrupting either chromatin reader activity reverses DNA hypermethylation, reactivates epigenetically silenced tumor suppressor genes (TSGs), and reduces CRC oncogenic properties. Moreover, an inverse correlation between high UHRF1 and low TSG expression tracks with CRC progression and reduced patient survival. Defining critical UHRF1 domain functions and its relationship with CRC prognosis suggests directions for, and value of, targeting this protein to develop therapeutic DNA demethylating agents.

AKT drives SOX2 overexpression and cancer cell stemness in esophageal cancer by protecting SOX2 from UBR5-mediated degradation

As a transcription factor critical for embryonic and adult stem cell self-renewal and function, SOX2 gene amplification has been recognized as a driving factor for various cancers including esophageal cancer. SOX2 overexpression occurs more broadly in cancer than gene amplification, but the mechanism is poorly understood. Here we showed that in esophageal cancer cell lines the levels of SOX2 proteins are not directly correlated to the copy numbers of SOX2 genes and are strongly influenced by proteostasis. We showed that AKT is a major determinant for SOX2 overexpression and does so by protecting SOX2 from ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. We identified UBR5 as a major ubiquitin E3 ligase that induces SOX2 degradation through ubiquitinating SOX2 at lysine 115. Phosphorylation of SOX2 at threonine 116 by AKT inhibits the interaction of UBR5 with SOX2 and thus stabilizes SOX2. We provided evidence that AKT inhibitor can effectively downregulate SOX2 and suppress esopheageal cancer cell proliferation and stemness. Taken together, our study provides new insight into the mechanism of SOX2 overexpression in cancer and evidence for targeting AKT as a potential therapeutic strategy for SOX2-positive cancers.

Coordinated Dialogue between UHRF1 and DNMT1 to Ensure Faithful Inheritance of Methylated DNA Patterns

DNA methylation, catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), is an epigenetic mark that needs to be faithfully replicated during mitosis in order to maintain cell phenotype during successive cell divisions. This epigenetic mark is located on the 5′-carbon of the cytosine mainly within cytosine–phosphate–guanine (CpG) dinucleotides. DNA methylation is asymmetrically positioned on both DNA strands, temporarily generating a hemi-methylated state after DNA replication. Hemi-methylation is a particular status of DNA that is recognized by ubiquitin-like containing plant homeodomain (PHD) and really interesting new gene (RING) finger domains 1 (UHRF1) through its SET- (Su(var)3-9, Enhancer-of-zeste and Trithorax) and RING-associated (SRA) domain. This interaction is considered to be involved in the recruitment of DNMT1 to chromatin in order to methylate the adequate cytosine on the newly synthetized DNA strand. The UHRF1/DNMT1 tandem plays a pivotal role in the inheritance of DNA methylation patterns, but the fine-tuning mechanism remains a mystery. Indeed, because DNMT1 experiences difficulties in finding the cytosine to be methylated, it requires the help of a guide, i.e., of UHRF1, which exhibits higher affinity for hemi-methylated DNA vs. non-methylated DNA. Two models of the UHRF1/DNMT1 dialogue were suggested to explain how DNMT1 is recruited to chromatin: (i) an indirect communication via histone H3 ubiquitination, and (ii) a direct interaction of UHRF1 with DNMT1. In the present review, these two models are discussed, and we try to show that they are compatible with each other.

A Bifunctional Role for the UHRF1 UBL Domain in the Control of Hemi-methylated DNA-Dependent Histone Ubiquitylation

DNA methylation patterns regulate gene expression programs and are maintained through a highly coordinated process orchestrated by the RING E3 ubiquitin ligase UHRF1. UHRF1 controls DNA methylation inheritance by reading epigenetic modifications to histones and DNA to activate histone H3 ubiquitylation. Here, we find that all five domains of UHRF1, including the previously uncharacterized ubiquitin-like domain (UBL), cooperate for hemi-methylated DNA-dependent H3 ubiquitin ligation. Our structural and biochemical studies, including mutations found in cancer genomes, reveal a bifunctional requirement for the UBL in histone modification: (1) the UBL makes an essential interaction with the backside of the E2 and (2) the UBL coordinates with other UHRF1 domains that recognize epigenetic marks on DNA and histone H3 to direct ubiquitin to H3. Finally, we show UBLs from other E3s also have a conserved interaction with the E2, Ube2D, highlighting a potential prevalence of interactions between UBLs and E2s.

Identification of UHRF2 as a novel DNA interstrand crosslink sensor protein

The Fanconi Anemia (FA) pathway is important for repairing interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) between the Watson-Crick strands of the DNA double helix. An initial and essential stage in the repair process is the detection of the ICL. Here, we report the identification of UHRF2, a paralogue of UHRF1, as an ICL sensor protein. UHRF2 is recruited to ICLs in the genome within seconds of their appearance. We show that UHRF2 cooperates with UHRF1, to ensure recruitment of FANCD2 to ICLs. A direct protein-protein interaction is formed between UHRF1 and UHRF2, and between either UHRF1 and UHRF2, and FANCD2. Importantly, we demonstrate that the essential monoubiquitination of FANCD2 is stimulated by UHRF1/UHRF2. The stimulation is mediating by a retention of FANCD2 on chromatin, allowing for its monoubiquitination by the FA core complex. Taken together, we uncover a mechanism of ICL sensing by UHRF2, leading to FANCD2 recruitment and retention at ICLs, in turn facilitating activation of FANCD2 by monoubiquitination.

Epigenetic Inheritance: Concepts, Mechanisms and Perspectives

Parents’ stressful experiences can influence an offspring’s vulnerability to many pathological conditions, including psychopathologies, and their effects may even endure for several generations. Nevertheless, the cause of this phenomenon has not been determined, and only recently have scientists turned to epigenetics to answer this question. There is extensive literature on epigenetics, but no consensus exists with regard to how and what can (and must) be considered to study and define epigenetics processes and their inheritance. In this work, we aimed to clarify and systematize these concepts. To this end, we analyzed the dynamics of epigenetic changes over time in detail and defined three types of epigenetics: a direct form of epigenetics (DE) and two indirect epigenetic processes—within (WIE) and across (AIE). DE refers to changes that occur in the lifespan of an individual, due to direct experiences with his environment. WIE concerns changes that occur inside of the womb, due to events during gestation. Finally, AIE defines changes that affect the individual’s predecessors (parents, grandparents, etc.), due to events that occur even long before conception and that are somehow (e.g., through gametes, the intrauterine environment setting) transmitted across generations. This distinction allows us to organize the main body of epigenetic evidence according to these categories and then focus on the latter (AIE), referring to it as a faster route of informational transmission across generations—compared with genetic inheritance—that guides human evolution in a Lamarckian (i.e., experience-dependent) manner. Of the molecular processes that are implicated in this phenomenon, well-known (methylation) and novel (non-coding RNA, ncRNA) regulatory mechanisms are converging. Our discussion of the chief methods that are used to study epigenetic inheritance highlights the most compelling technical and theoretical problems of this discipline. Experimental suggestions to expand this field are provided, and their practical and ethical implications are discussed extensively.