Young people's mental health is finally getting the attention it needs

Evaluating outcomes following adolescent and youth mental health inpatient admissions: A systematic review

AIM

Increasing rates of mental illness among young people, exacerbated by the negative impacts of COVID-19, has resulted in growing pressure on available psychiatric resources to meet increasing demand. Inpatient units provide specialist care for young people with the most severe and complex mental disorders but are one of the most expensive models of psychiatric care. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the effectiveness of adolescent and youth mental health inpatient units in improving outcomes to inform the most efficacious use of psychiatric resources.

METHODS

Systematic searches of PubMed, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science were conducted for studies published in English between January 2011 to May 2022. Criteria for selection included participants aged 12-25 years who had been admitted to amental health inpatient unit. Studies were excluded if set in substance abuse or disability specific units, outpatient or forensic settings, or assessed novel interventions.

RESULTS

23 studies were identified as meeting inclusion criteria, with most (n = 19) utilizing a pre-post observational design and reporting improvement across various domains following inpatient treatment. A total of 24 different outcome measures or methods were used meaning a meta-analysis of results was not possible. There was also a lack of consistency across models of care, lengths of stay, admission policies, and interventions provided.

CONCLUSION

Inpatient units provide positive outcomes for consumers however a clear understanding of clinical significance and comparison to other treatment settings is lacking.

Mental Health-Related Outpatient Visits Among Adolescents and Young Adults, 2006-2019

Importance

Concerns over the mental health of young people have been increasing over the past decade, especially with the rise in mental health burden seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Examining trends in mental health-related outpatient visits provides critical information to elucidate contributing factors, identify vulnerable populations, and inform strategies to address the mental health crisis.

Objective

To examine characteristics and trends in mental health-related outpatient visits and psychotropic medication use among US adolescents and young adults.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, an annual probability sample survey, was conducted from January 2006 to December 2019. Participants included adolescents (age 12-17 years) and young adults (age 18-24 years) with office-based outpatient visits in the US. Data were analyzed from March 1, 2023, to September 15, 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Mental health-related outpatient visits were identified based on established sets of diagnostic codes for psychiatric disorders. Temporal trends in the annual proportion of mental health-related outpatient visits were assessed, including visits associated with use of psychotropic medications. Analyses were stratified by age and sex.

Results

From 2006 to 2019, there were an estimated 1.1 billion outpatient visits by adolescents and young adults, of which 145.0 million (13.1%) were associated with a mental health condition (mean [SD] age, 18.4 [3.5] years; 74.0 million females [51.0%]). Mental health-related diagnoses were more prevalent among visits by male (16.8%) compared with female (10.9%) patients (P < .001). This difference was most pronounced among young adults, with 20.1% of visits associated with a psychiatric diagnosis among males vs 10.1% among females (P < .001). The proportion of mental health-related visits nearly doubled, from 8.9% in 2006 to 16.9% in 2019 (P < .001). Among all outpatient visits, 17.2% were associated with the prescription of at least 1 psychotropic medication, with significant increases from 12.8% to 22.4% by 2019 (P < .001).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cross-sectional study, there were substantial increases in mental health-related outpatient visits and use of psychotropic medications, with greater overall burden among male patients. These findings provide a baseline for understanding post-pandemic shifts and suggest that current treatment and prevention strategies will need to address preexisting psychiatric needs in addition to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The youth mental health crisis: Quasi-experimental evidence on the role of school closures

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the youth mental health crisis has reached unprecedented levels. To which extent school closures, one of the most heavily debated pandemic measures, have contributed to or even caused this crisis is largely unknown. We seek to narrow this blind spot, by combining quasi-experimental variation in school closure and reopening strategies across the German federal states at the onset of the pandemic with nationwide, population-based survey data on youth mental health and high-frequency data from the largest crisis helpline. We show that prolonged school closures led to a substantial deterioration in youth health-related quality of life, precipitating early signs of mental health problems. The effects were most severe among boys, younger adolescents, and families with limited living space. We further provide evidence that family problems are a major issue that adolescents were struggling with when denied access to school. Overall, school closures largely explain the deterioration of youth mental health over the first pandemic wave.

Have We Loosened the Definition of Disability? The Effects of Changes in the Law and Its Interpretation on Clinical Practice

Evolving changes in the law and documentation guidelines since the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act have led to a loosening of the definition of disability, in which relative weaknesses are now interpreted as evidence of a disability. In this paper, after acknowledging my own shortcomings, I trace the evolution of the law and documentation guidelines from the late 1990s to the present. I discuss how this has led to increased pressure from parents and students on evaluating clinicians to diagnose a disorder and confirm that the student has a disability that requires academic accommodations. Rather than recommending effective interventions and compensatory strategies, many stakeholders (parents, students, psychologists, disability support professionals) now seem to preferentially favor provision of accommodations. I conclude by describing how these changes have affected my own practice and make recommendations for best practices for disability documentation.

Elements in Mental Health Interventions Associated with Effects on Emotion Regulation in Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Adolescence is a sensitive period for developing mental health problems. Interventions targeting emotion regulation have shown promising transdiagnostic effects for this group, but optimization efforts are called for. In the current study, we used an element-based approach to identify potentially active ingredients in interventions measuring emotion regulation, to guide further optimization.

METHODS

We coded practice elements in 30 studies based on a systematic review of mental health interventions measuring emotion regulation in adolescents (N = 2,389 participants, mean age 13-17 years). Using a three-level modeling approach, we then investigated the difference in effect on emotion regulation between studies of interventions with and without these practice elements.

RESULTS

We identified 75 practice elements and 15 element categories used in the included interventions. Results showed significantly stronger effects on emotion regulation when interventions included the practice elements Setting goals for treatment (difference in d = 0.40, 95% CI [0.09, 0.70], p = .012) and Psychoeducation about acceptance (difference in d = 0.58, 95% CI [0.09, 1.07], p = .021). Furthermore, a total of 11 elements and four overall categories were identified as potentially active ingredients, based on an effect size difference of > 0.20 between interventions with and without the elements.

CONCLUSION

The results can direct experimental research into the selection of practices that are most likely key to mechanisms of change in interventions addressing emotion regulation for adolescents. The challenge of measuring emotion regulation is discussed.