Dietary counselling and nutritional support in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy: persistent weight loss during 1-year follow-ups

Influence of nutritional counseling on treatment results in patients with head and neck cancers

OBJECTIVES

Nutritional intervention, including nutritional counseling (NC), plays a significant role in the comprehensive management of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of NC combined with oral nutritional supplements during radical treatment on weight loss and survival outcomes in patients with HNC.

METHODS

The study included 310 patients who received radical treatment for HNC. Among these patients, 119 underwent NC along with oral nutritional supplements (NCONS); 191 were supported with oral nutritional supplements only (ONS). The study aimed to investigate the effects of sex, disease stage, treatment modality, and tumor site on weight loss. Additionally, the Kaplan-Meier method assessed the influence of NC on overall survival and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

The present study suggested that the NC independently prevented weight loss, regardless of sex and disease stage (female: -1.6%, P = 0.001; male: -2.3 %, P = 0.003; T stage (0-2): -1.7%, P = 0.008; T stage (3-4): -2.7%, P = 0.003; N stage (0-1): 2.5%, P = 0,027; N stage (3-4): 2.9%, P < 0.001). The protective effect was most significant in patients with oral cancer and oropharyngeal cancer and in patients treated with chemotherapy (oral: -1.7%, P = 0.03; oropharynx: -3.3%, P < 0.001; radiochemotherapy: -3%, P = 0.028; induction chemotherapy preceded radiochemotherapy: -6%, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the 3-year overall survival rates were 93.4% and 85.4% in the NC along with oral nutritional supplements (NCONS) and oral nutritional supplement (ONS) groups, respectively (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HNC who received NC during radical treatment experienced reduced weight loss. This effect was particularly pronounced in patients with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer and those undergoing chemotherapy. Additionally, NC was associated with improved overall survival in this patient cohort. Nevertheless, further studies are required to validate and support these findings.

Impact of weight loss on treatment interruption and unplanned hospital admission in head and neck cancer patients undergoing curative (chemo)-radiotherapy in Hong Kong

PURPOSE

Malnutrition is highly prevalent in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, with weight loss being one of the major nutritional indicators. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of weight loss on treatment interruptions and unplanned hospital admissions in HNC patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, consecutive HNC patients who started RT between January 2011 and December 2019 were included. Data from a total of 1086 subjects with 747 (68.8%) nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPCs) and 31.2% (N=339) non-NPC patients were analysed. Body weight (BW) was measured before, during, and after RT treatment. Factors associated with ≥10% weight loss, treatment interruption, and unplanned admissions were analysed using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The prevalence of ≥10% weight loss was 26.8% (N=288), with 32.7% (N=243) in NPC and 13.5% (N=45) in non-NPC patients. The prevalence of RT delay in patients with ≥10% vs. <10% weight loss was 6.2% vs. 7.0% (p=0.668) in NPC patients and 42.2% vs. 50.5% (p=0.300) in non-NPC patients. The prevalence of unplanned admissions in patients with ≥10% vs. <10% weight loss was 51.9% vs. 25.3% (p<0.001) in NPC patients and 68.9% vs. 27.0% (p<0.001) in non-NPC patients.

CONCLUSION

In our study, ≥10% weight loss was found to be associated with a higher rate of unplanned admissions but not with RT delay or chemotherapy interruption.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

With the knowledge of the impact of weight loss on hospital admissions and the characteristics of patients with weight loss, nutritional intervention can be effectively focused on the stratification of patients for intensive nutritional support to reduce weight loss.

Using coword analysis and chord diagrams to examine the effect of nutritional counseling and support (DCNS) on patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Dietary counseling and nutritional support (DCNS) are generally accepted as being necessary for patients with oral cancer and oropharyngeal cancer (OC). However, there is no evidence that dietary counseling plays a significant role in weight loss. In this study, we examined the DCNS based on persistent weight loss during and after treatment in oral cancer and OC patients, as well as the effect of body mass index (BMI) on survival in both groups.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 2622 patients diagnosed with cancer between 2007 and 2020, including 1836 oral and 786 oropharyngeal patients. In comparison with the sample of patients treated by DCNS, differences in proportional counts for key factors associated with survival were compared between oral cancer and OC patients using the forest plot. An analysis of cowords was conducted to determine CNS associated with weight loss and overall survival. The Sankey diagram was used to display DCNS effectiveness. The log-rank test was used to evaluate the chi-squared goodness of fit test on the null assumption model of equal survival distributions between the groups.

RESULTS

Almost 41% of the patients (=1064/2262) received DCNS, with a frequency ranging from 1 to 44. Counts for 4 DCNS categories were 566, 392, 92, and 14, respectively, against BMI increases or decreases from much to less with counts of 3, 44, 795, 219, and 3, respectively. In the first year following treatment, DCNS decreased sharply to 50%. One year after hospital discharge, the overall weight loss increased from 3 to 9% (mean = -4%, standard deviation = 14%). Patients with a BMI above average had a significantly longer survival time (P < .001). Statistically, OC patients have a significantly higher survival rate than oral cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite receiving frequent DCNS, patients continued to lose body weight during and 1 year after treatment. The survival time of an individual with a BMI above average appears to be increased. Future studies should preferably use randomized trials to compare standard DCNS with more intensive DCNS, which includes earlier and/or prolonged treatment.

Nutritional Support in Head and Neck Radiotherapy Patients Considering HPV Status

Malnutrition is a common problem in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), including oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). It is caused by insufficient food intake due to dysphagia, odynophagia, and a lack of appetite caused by the tumor. It is also secondary to the oncological treatment of the basic disease, such as radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), as a consequence of mucositis with the dry mouth, loss of taste, and dysphagia. The severe dysphagia leads to a definitive total impossibility of eating through the mouth in 20–30% of patients. These patients usually require enteral nutritional support. Feeding tubes are a commonly used nutritional intervention during radiotherapy, most frequently percutaneous gastrostomy tube. Recently, a novel HPV-related type of OPC has been described. Patients with HPV-associated OPC are different from the HPV− ones. Typical HPV− OPC is associated with smoking and alcohol abuse. Patients with HPV+ OPC are younger and healthy (without comorbidities) at diagnosis compared to HPV− ones. Patients with OPC are at high nutritional risk, and therefore, they require nutritional support in order to improve the treatment results and quality of life. Some authors noted the high incidence of critical weight loss (CWL) in patients with HPV-related OPC. Other authors have observed the increased acute toxicities during oncological treatment in HPV+ OPC patients compared to HPV− ones. The aim of this paper is to review and discuss the indications for nutritional support and the kinds of nutrition, including immunonutrition (IN), in HNC, particularly OPC patients, undergoing RT/CRT, considering HPV status.

Nutritional outcomes in head and neck cancer patients: is intensive nutritional care worth it?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare nutritional outcomes before and after implementation of weekly dietetic counseling (intensive nutritional care) in head and neck cancers patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study with all head and neck patients, who received radiotherapy between January 2010 and December 2017 were performed. The main outcome was significant weight loss. Compliance to caloric and protein recommendations were also evaluated.

RESULTS

In all, 472 patients were included. Weight loss was not different between before and after implementation (-6.7%; IQ -10.5/-1.9 vs -5.0%; IQ -9.8/-0.7;p=0.06).There were no significant difference in terms of meeting the recommended intake. Higher baseline body mass index and oral nutritional support predicted significant weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of intensive nutritional care did not have an impact on weight loss and energy and protein intake in head and neck cancer patients. Further research would be of value to determine the appropriate service-delivery model to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

Evaluation of classification and regression tree (CART) model in weight loss prediction following head and neck cancer radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

We explore whether a knowledge-discovery approach building a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) prediction model for weight loss (WL) in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) is feasible.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

HNC patients from 2007 to 2015 were identified from a prospectively collected database Oncospace. Two prediction models at different time points were developed to predict weight loss ≥5 kg at 3 months post-RT by CART algorithm: (1) during RT planning using patient demographic, delineated dose data, planning target volume-organs at risk shape relationships data and (2) at the end of treatment (EOT) using additional on-treatment toxicities and quality of life data.

RESULTS

Among 391 patients identified, WL predictors during RT planning were International Classification of Diseases diagnosis; dose to masticatory and superior constrictor muscles, larynx, and parotid; and age. At EOT, patient-reported oral intake, diagnosis, N stage, nausea, pain, dose to larynx, parotid, and low-dose planning target volume-larynx distance were significant predictive factors. The area under the curve during RT and EOT was 0.773 and 0.821, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the feasibility and potential value of an informatics infrastructure that has facilitated insight into the prediction of WL using the CART algorithm. The prediction accuracy significantly improved with the inclusion of additional treatment-related data and has the potential to be leveraged as a strategy to develop a learning health system.

Positive Effect of Higher Adult Body Mass Index on Overall Survival of Digestive System Cancers Except Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

High body mass index (BMI) has been inconsistently associated with overall survival (OS) of digestive system cancers (DSCs). This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether high BMI was associated with DSCs prognosis. 34 studies were accepted, with a total of 23,946 DSC cases. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for OS in BMI categories from individual studies were extracted and pooled by random-effect model. The overall HR of DSCs except pancreatic cancer for OS of adult overweight cases was 0.76 (95% CI = 0.67–0.85). DSC individuals except pancreatic cancer with adult obesity were at decreased risk for OS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.72–0.98). Among DSC patients except pancreatic cancer, the overall HR for the highest versus the lowest BMI category was 0.82 (95% CI = 0.71–0.92). Additionally, comparing the highest and lowest BMI categories, the combined HR of pancreatic cancer was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.01–1.43). Our meta-analysis suggested an increased OS among adult overweight and obese DSC survivors except pancreatic cancer. Overweight and obesity in adulthood may be important prognostic factors that indicate an increased survival from DSC patients except pancreatic cancer.

Nutrition management for head and neck cancer patients improves clinical outcome and survival

Up to 80% of patients with head and neck cancers are malnourished because of their lifestyle and the risk factors associated with this disease. Unfortunately, nutrition management systems are not implemented in most head and neck cancer clinics. Even worse, many head and neck surgeons as well as hospital management authorities disregard the importance of nutrition management in head and neck cancer patients. In addition, the often extensive resection and reconstruction required for tumors in the upper aerodigestive tract pose special challenges for swallowing and sufficient food intake, placing special demands on nutrition management. This article presents the basics of perioperative metabolism and nutrition management of head and neck cancer patients and makes recommendations for clinical practice. Implementing a nutrition management system in head and neck cancer clinics will improve the clinical outcome and the survival of the patients.