1
|
Noble DJ, Yeap PL, Seah SYK, Harrison K, Shelley LEA, Romanchikova M, Bates AM, Zheng Y, Barnett GC, Benson RJ, Jefferies SJ, Thomas SJ, Jena R, Burnet NG. Anatomical change during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, and its effect on delivered dose to the spinal cord. Radiother Oncol 2018; 130:32-38. [PMID: 30049455 PMCID: PMC6358720 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A cohort of 133 head & neck cancer patients treated with TomoTherapy was examined. Differences between planned and delivered maximum spinal cord dose were small. Substantial weight loss and anatomical change during treatment was observed. No link between weight loss or anatomical change, and dose differences was seen.
Background and purpose The impact of weight loss and anatomical change during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy on spinal cord dosimetry is poorly understood, limiting evidence-based adaptive management strategies. Materials and methods 133 H&N patients treated with daily mega-voltage CT image-guidance (MVCT-IG) on TomoTherapy, were selected. Elastix software was used to deform planning scan SC contours to MVCT-IG scans, and accumulate dose. Planned (DP) and delivered (DA) spinal cord D2% (SCD2%) were compared. Univariate relationships between neck irradiation strategy (unilateral vs bilateral), T-stage, N-stage, weight loss, and changes in lateral separation (LND) and CT slice surface area (SSA) at C1 and the superior thyroid notch (TN), and ΔSCD2% [(DA – DP) D2%] were examined. Results The mean value for (DA – DP) D2% was −0.07 Gy (95%CI −0.28 to 0.14, range −5.7 Gy to 3.8 Gy), and the mean absolute difference between DP and DA (independent of difference direction) was 0.9 Gy (95%CI 0.76–1.04 Gy). Neck treatment strategy (p = 0.39) and T-stage (p = 0.56) did not affect ΔSCD2%. Borderline significance (p = 0.09) was seen for higher N-stage (N2-3) and higher ΔSCD2%. Mean reductions in anatomical metrics were substantial: weight loss 6.8 kg; C1LND 12.9 mm; C1SSA 12.1 cm2; TNLND 5.3 mm; TNSSA 11.2 cm2, but no relationship between weight loss or anatomical change and ΔSCD2% was observed (all r2 < 0.1). Conclusions Differences between delivered and planned spinal cord D2% are small in patients treated with daily IG. Even patients experiencing substantial weight loss or anatomical change during treatment do not require adaptive replanning for spinal cord safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Noble
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - Ping-Lin Yeap
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Shannon Y K Seah
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Karl Harrison
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Leila E A Shelley
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marina Romanchikova
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amy M Bates
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Box 401, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
| | - Yaolin Zheng
- University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, UK; Department of Medicine, Cheltenham General Hospital, UK
| | - Gillian C Barnett
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Richard J Benson
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Sarah J Jefferies
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Simon J Thomas
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raj Jena
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Neil G Burnet
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cancer-associated weight loss is a common comorbid condition best described among patients with advanced malignancy receiving systemic therapy, but its relationship to patients undergoing radiation treatment is less well described. We review the interaction between cancer-associated weight loss and radiation treatment as well as its prognostic significance. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies demonstrate a consistent detrimental effect of cancer-associated weight loss either existing prior to treatment or developing during radiotherapy. Emerging data suggest cancer-associated weight loss independently contributes to an aggressive malignant phenotype rather than simply reflecting a consequence of disease. Novel therapies are urgently needed to address the unmet burden of cancer-associated weight loss. SUMMARY Consideration of cancer-associated weight loss is important among patients receiving radiotherapy. Further study will further characterize the relationship and identify targetable biologic mechanisms of cancer cachexia.
Collapse
|
3
|
Nishikawa D, Hanai N, Suzuki H, Koide Y, Beppu S, Hasegawa Y. The Impact of Skeletal Muscle Depletion on Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2018; 80:1-9. [PMID: 29393251 DOI: 10.1159/000485515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skeletal muscle depletion and sarcopenia have been reported as poor prognostic factors for several types of cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of skeletal muscle depletion and sarcopenia on the outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. METHODS Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated from January 2013 to June 2014 were included in this study. The pretreatment cross-sectional area of skeletal muscle at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) was measured by computed tomography image analysis using the ImageJ software. L3 skeletal muscle index (SMI) and fat-free mass (FFM) were calculated. RESULTS Eighty-five patients with HNSCC were included. The cut-off value of sarcopenia was set at SMI <46.7 cm2/m2 (males) and 30.3 cm2/m2 (females). The cut-off value of FFM was set at 42.3 kg (males) and 30.6 kg (females). Patients with a low SMI (sarcopenia) and low FFM had a significantly poorer prognosis than others, especially those who received definitive radiotherapy. Sarcopenia and low FFM are independent factors for poor prognosis in patients with HNSCC. CONCLUSION The skeletal muscle area at L3 should be calculated when considering treatment options for head and neck cancer.
Collapse
|
5
|
Maggiore R, Zumsteg ZS, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Trevino KM, Gajra A, Korc-Grodzicki B, Epstein JB, Bond SM, Parker I, Kish JA, Murphy BA, VanderWalde NA. The Older Adult With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Knowledge Gaps and Future Direction in Assessment and Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:868-883. [PMID: 28602414 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) pose unique treatment and supportive care challenges to oncologists and other cancer care providers. The majority of patients with HNSCC present with locoregionally advanced disease, for which combined-modality treatment integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy is often necessary to maximize tumor control. However, applying these approaches to an older population with concomitant comorbidities and a higher risk of functional impairments remains challenging and is exacerbated by the paucity of studies involving older adults. The purpose of this article is to identify knowledge gaps in the evaluation and management of older adults with HNSCC-particularly those undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy-and their caregivers through a review of the literature conducted by clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. The findings highlight the importance of a geriatric assessment and the therapeutic paradigms and challenges relevant to this population. Furthermore, we identify the need for additional research and interventions related to key supportive care issues that arise during and after treatment in older adults with locoregionally advanced HNSCC. On the basis of our findings, we prioritize these issues to guide future patient-oriented research endeavors to address these knowledge gaps and thus better serve this growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Maggiore
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Zachary S Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Kelly M Trevino
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Ajeet Gajra
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University Cancer Center, Syracuse, New York
| | | | - Joel B Epstein
- Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stewart M Bond
- Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
| | - Ira Parker
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Julie A Kish
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Barbara A Murphy
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Noam A VanderWalde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-West Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mazzola R, Ricchetti F, Fiorentino A, Giaj-Levra N, Fersino S, Tebano U, Albanese S, Gori S, Alongi F. Fentanyl pectin nasal spray for painful mucositis in head and neck cancers during intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy. Clin Transl Oncol 2016; 19:593-598. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1570-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/31/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|