1
|
Del Llano E, Perrin A, Morel F, Devillard F, Harbuz R, Satre V, Amblard F, Bidart M, Hennebicq S, Brouillet S, Ray PF, Coutton C, Martinez G. Sperm Meiotic Segregation Analysis of Reciprocal Translocations Carriers: We Have Bigger FISH to Fry. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24043664. [PMID: 36835074 PMCID: PMC9965694 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24043664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Reciprocal translocation (RT) carriers produce a proportion of unbalanced gametes that expose them to a higher risk of infertility, recurrent miscarriage, and fetus or children with congenital anomalies and developmental delay. To reduce these risks, RT carriers can benefit from prenatal diagnosis (PND) or preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). Sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization (spermFISH) has been used for decades to investigate the sperm meiotic segregation of RT carriers, but a recent report indicates a very low correlation between spermFISH and PGD outcomes, raising the question of the usefulness of spermFISH for these patients. To address this point, we report here the meiotic segregation of 41 RT carriers, the largest cohort reported to date, and conduct a review of the literature to investigate global segregation rates and look for factors that may or may not influence them. We confirm that the involvement of acrocentric chromosomes in the translocation leads to more unbalanced gamete proportions, in contrast to sperm parameters or patient age. In view of the dispersion of balanced sperm rates, we conclude that routine implementation of spermFISH is not beneficial for RT carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Del Llano
- Genetic Epigenetic and Therapies of Infertility, Institute for Advanced Biosciences INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Aurore Perrin
- Department of Medical Genetics and Reproductive Biology, Brest University Regional Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- Inserm, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, 29200 Brest, France
| | - Frédéric Morel
- Department of Medical Genetics and Reproductive Biology, Brest University Regional Hospital, 29200 Brest, France
- Inserm, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, EFS, UMR 1078, GGB, 29200 Brest, France
| | - Françoise Devillard
- UM de Génétique Chromosomique, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Radu Harbuz
- UM de Génétique Chromosomique, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Véronique Satre
- Genetic Epigenetic and Therapies of Infertility, Institute for Advanced Biosciences INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, 38000 Grenoble, France
- UM de Génétique Chromosomique, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Florence Amblard
- UM de Génétique Chromosomique, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Marie Bidart
- Genetic Epigenetic and Therapies of Infertility, Institute for Advanced Biosciences INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Sylviane Hennebicq
- Genetic Epigenetic and Therapies of Infertility, Institute for Advanced Biosciences INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, 38000 Grenoble, France
- Centre Clinique et Biologique d’Assistance Médicale à la Procréation, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Sophie Brouillet
- DEFE, Université de Montpellier, INSERM 1203, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, CHU de Montpellier, IRMB, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, CEDEX 05, 34295 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre F. Ray
- Genetic Epigenetic and Therapies of Infertility, Institute for Advanced Biosciences INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Charles Coutton
- Genetic Epigenetic and Therapies of Infertility, Institute for Advanced Biosciences INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, 38000 Grenoble, France
- UM de Génétique Chromosomique, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, 38000 Grenoble, France
| | - Guillaume Martinez
- Genetic Epigenetic and Therapies of Infertility, Institute for Advanced Biosciences INSERM U1209, CNRS UMR5309, 38000 Grenoble, France
- UM de Génétique Chromosomique, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, 38000 Grenoble, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hanlon VCT, Lansdorp PM, Guryev V. A survey of current methods to detect and genotype inversions. Hum Mutat 2022; 43:1576-1589. [PMID: 36047337 DOI: 10.1002/humu.24458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Polymorphic inversions are ubiquitous in humans, and they have been linked to both adaptation and disease. Following their discovery in Drosophila more than a century ago, inversions have proved to be more elusive than other structural variants. A wide variety of methods for the detection and genotyping of inversions have recently been developed: multiple techniques based on selective amplification by PCR, short- and long-read sequencing approaches, principal component analysis of small variant haplotypes, template strand sequencing, optical mapping, and various genome assembly methods. Many methods apply complex wet lab protocols or increasingly refined bioinformatic analyses. This review is an attempt to provide a practical summary and comparison of the methods that are in current use, with a focus on metrics such as the maximum size of segmental duplications at inversion breakpoints that each method can tolerate, the size range of inversions that they recover, their throughput, and whether the locations of putative inversions must be known beforehand. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter M Lansdorp
- Terry Fox Laboratory, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1L3, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Victor Guryev
- European Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ogur C, Kahraman S, Griffin DK, Cinar Yapan C, Tufekci MA, Cetinkaya M, Temel SG, Yilmaz A. PGT for structural chromosomal rearrangements in 300 couples reveals specific risk factors but an interchromosomal effect is unlikely. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 46:713-727. [PMID: 36803887 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What factors affect the proportion of chromosomally balanced embryos in structural rearrangement carriers? Is there any evidence for an interchromosomal effect (ICE)? DESIGN Preimplantation genetic testing outcomes of 300 couples (198 reciprocal, 60 Robertsonian, 31 inversion and 11 complex structural rearrangement carriers) were assessed retrospectively. Blastocysts were analysed either by array-comparative genomic hybridization or next-generation sequencing techniques. ICE was investigated using a matched control group and sophisticated statistical measurement of effect size (φ). RESULTS 300 couples underwent 443 cycles; 1835 embryos were analysed and 23.8% were diagnosed as both normal/balanced and euploid. The overall cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were 69.5% and 55.8%, respectively. Complex translocations and female age (≥35) were found to be risk factors associated with lower chance of having a transferable embryo (P < 0.001). Based on analysis of 5237 embryos, the cumulative de-novo aneuploidy rate was lower in carriers compared to controls (45.6% versus 53.4%, P < 0.001) but this was a 'negligible' association (φ < 0.1). A further assessment of 117,033 chromosomal pairs revealed a higher individual chromosome error rate in embryos of carriers compared to controls (5.3% versus 4.9%), which was also a 'negligible' association (φ < 0.1), despite a P-value of 0.007. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that rearrangement type, female age and sex of the carrier have significant impacts on the proportion of transferable embryos. Careful examination of structural rearrangement carriers and controls indicated little or no evidence for an ICE. This study helps to provide a statistical model for investigating ICE and an improved personalized reproductive genetics assessment for structural rearrangement carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cagri Ogur
- Yildiz Technical University, Department of Bioengineering, Istanbul, Turkey; Igenomix Avrupa Laboratories, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Semra Kahraman
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Darren Karl Griffin
- School of Biosciences, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies of Reproduction, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7NJ, UK
| | - Cigdem Cinar Yapan
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Tufekci
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Cetinkaya
- Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sehime Gulsun Temel
- Uludag University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Genetics, Bursa, Turkey.
| | - Alper Yilmaz
- Yildiz Technical University, Department of Bioengineering, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang X, Shi Q, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Yang X, Liu R, Zhang H. Fertility problems in males carrying an inversion of chromosome 10. Open Med (Wars) 2021; 16:316-321. [PMID: 33681470 PMCID: PMC7917366 DOI: 10.1515/med-2021-0240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Chromosomal inversion is closely related to male infertility. Inversion carriers may produce abnormal gametes, which may lead to partial duplication/deletion of the embryonic chromosome and result in spontaneous abortion, a fetus with multiple anomalies, or birth of a malformed child. Genetic counselling remains challenging for these carriers in clinical practice. We report two male carriers with inversion of chromosome 10 and review 26 reported cases. In the first case, 46,XX,inv(10)(p13q22) of the fetal chromosome was found in prenatal diagnosis; this was inherited from the paternal side with 46XY,inv(10)(p13q22). Another case was a male carrier with inv(10)(q21.2q22.1). There have been 25 (89.3%) cases of pericentric inversion and three (10.7%) cases of paracentric inversion involving chromosome 10. Of 28 cases, nine were associated with pregestational infertility of the couples, while the other 19 cases were associated with gestational infertility of the couples or normozoospermia. The breakpoints at 10p15, 10p11, 10q11, and 10q21 were associated with pregestational infertility of the couples. The breakpoints at 10p15, 10p14, 10p13, 10p12, 10p11, 10q11, 10q21, 10q22, 10q23, 10q24, 10q25, and 10q26 were related to gestational infertility of the couples or normozoospermia. Although there is a high risk of infertility or recurrent miscarriages, carriers with inversion of chromosome 10 might produce healthy offspring. Natural pregnancy can be used as a choice for inversion carriers with recurrent spontaneous abortion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyue Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130021, China
| | - Qingyang Shi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130021, China
| | - Yanhong Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130021, China
| | - Yuting Jiang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130021, China
| | - Xiao Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130021, China
| | - Ruizhi Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130021, China
| | - Hongguo Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine and Center for Prenatal Diagnosis, First Hospital, Jilin University, 1 Xinmin Street, Chaoyang District, Changchun, Jilin Province, 130021, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xie P, Hu L, Tan Y, Gong F, Zhang S, Xiong B, Peng Y, Lu GX, Lin G. Retrospective analysis of meiotic segregation pattern and interchromosomal effects in blastocysts from inversion preimplantation genetic testing cycles. Fertil Steril 2019; 112:336-342.e3. [PMID: 31103288 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine factors affecting unbalanced chromosomal rearrangement originating from parental inversion and interchromosomal effect occurrence in blastocysts from inversion carriers. DESIGN Retrospective study. SETTING University-affiliated center. PATIENT(S) Couples with one partner carrying inversion underwent preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangement cycles. INTERVENTION(S) Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Unbalanced rearrangement embryo rate, normal embryo rate, interchromosomal effect. RESULT(S) Preimplantation genetic testing was performed for 576 blastocysts from 57 paracentric (PAI) and 94 pericentric (PEI) inversion carriers. The percentage of normal/balanced blastocysts was significantly higher in PAI than PEI carriers (70.4% vs. 57.5%). Logistic regression indicated the inverted segment size ratio was a statistically significant risk factor for abnormality from parental inversion in both PEI and PAI. The optimal cutoff values to predict unbalanced rearrangement risk were 35.7% and 57%. In PAI, rates of abnormality from parental inversion were 0% and 12.1% in the <35.7% and ≥35.7% groups, respectively, with no gender difference. For PEI, the rates of abnormality from parental inversion were 7.9% and 33.1% in the <57% and ≥57% groups, respectively. In the ≥57% group, the rate of unbalanced rearrangement was significantly higher from paternal than maternal inversion (43.3% vs. 23.6%). In inversion carriers, 21,208 chromosomes were examined, and 187 (0.88%) malsegregations were identified from structurally normal chromosomes. In controls, 56,488 chromosomes were assessed, and 497 (0.88%) aneuploidies were identified, indicating no significant difference. CONCLUSION(S) The risk of unbalanced rearrangement is affected by the ratio of inverted segment size in both PAI and PEI carriers and is associated with gender.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PingYuan Xie
- Hunan Normal University School of Medicine, Changsha, Hunan, China; National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China
| | - Liang Hu
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Yueqiu Tan
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Fei Gong
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - ShuoPing Zhang
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| | - Bo Xiong
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China
| | - Yangqin Peng
- Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| | - Guang Xiu Lu
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China; Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Ge Lin
- National Engineering and Research Center of Human Stem Cells, Changsha, China; Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, Changsha, China; Key Laboratory of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, Ministry of Health, Changsha, China; Institute of Reproductive and Stem Cell Engineering, School of Basic Medical Science, Central South University, Changsha, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fransz P, Linc G, Lee C, Aflitos SA, Lasky JR, Toomajian C, Ali H, Peters J, van Dam P, Ji X, Kuzak M, Gerats T, Schubert I, Schneeberger K, Colot V, Martienssen R, Koornneef M, Nordborg M, Juenger TE, de Jong H, Schranz ME. Molecular, genetic and evolutionary analysis of a paracentric inversion in Arabidopsis thaliana. THE PLANT JOURNAL : FOR CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2016; 88:159-178. [PMID: 27436134 PMCID: PMC5113708 DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2016] [Revised: 06/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Chromosomal inversions can provide windows onto the cytogenetic, molecular, evolutionary and demographic histories of a species. Here we investigate a paracentric 1.17-Mb inversion on chromosome 4 of Arabidopsis thaliana with nucleotide precision of its borders. The inversion is created by Vandal transposon activity, splitting an F-box and relocating a pericentric heterochromatin segment in juxtaposition with euchromatin without affecting the epigenetic landscape. Examination of the RegMap panel and the 1001 Arabidopsis genomes revealed more than 170 inversion accessions in Europe and North America. The SNP patterns revealed historical recombinations from which we infer diverse haplotype patterns, ancient introgression events and phylogenetic relationships. We find a robust association between the inversion and fecundity under drought. We also find linkage disequilibrium between the inverted region and the early flowering Col-FRIGIDA allele. Finally, SNP analysis elucidates the origin of the inversion to South-Eastern Europe approximately 5000 years ago and the FRI-Col allele to North-West Europe, and reveals the spreading of a single haplotype to North America during the 17th to 19th century. The 'American haplotype' was identified from several European localities, potentially due to return migration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Fransz
- Department of Plant Development and (Epi)GeneticsSwammerdam Institute for Life SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
| | - Gabriella Linc
- Department of Plant Development and (Epi)GeneticsSwammerdam Institute for Life SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Present address: Centre for Agricultural ResearchHungarian Academy of SciencesAgricultural InstituteMartonvásárHungary
| | - Cheng‐Ruei Lee
- Gregor Mendel Institute (GMI)Austrian Academy of SciencesVienna Biocenter (VBC)Dr Bohr‐Gasse 3Vienna1030Austria
| | | | - Jesse R. Lasky
- Department of BiologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkPAUSA
| | | | - Hoda Ali
- Department of Cytogenetics and Genome AnalysisThe Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)GaterslebenGermany
- Present address: Department of Genetics and CytologyNational Research CenterCairoEgypt
| | - Janny Peters
- Section Plant GeneticsInstitute for Wetland and Water Research Faculty of ScienceRadboud UniversityNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Peter van Dam
- Section Plant GeneticsInstitute for Wetland and Water Research Faculty of ScienceRadboud UniversityNijmegenthe Netherlands
- Present address: Department of Molecular Plant PathologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Xianwen Ji
- Laboratory of GeneticsWageningen UniversityWageningenthe Netherlands
| | - Mateusz Kuzak
- MAD, Dutch Genomics Service & Support ProviderSwammerdam Institute for Life SciencesUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- Present address: Netherlands eScience CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Tom Gerats
- Section Plant GeneticsInstitute for Wetland and Water Research Faculty of ScienceRadboud UniversityNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Ingo Schubert
- Department of Cytogenetics and Genome AnalysisThe Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)GaterslebenGermany
| | | | - Vincent Colot
- Unité de Recherche en Génomique Végétale (URGV)INRA/CNRS/UEVE 2 Rue Gaston CrémieuxEvry Cedex91057France
- Present address: Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure (IBENS)ParisFrance
| | - Rob Martienssen
- Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryCold Spring HarborNew YorkNY11724USA
| | - Maarten Koornneef
- Laboratory of GeneticsWageningen UniversityWageningenthe Netherlands
- Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding ResearchKöln50829Germany
| | - Magnus Nordborg
- Gregor Mendel Institute (GMI)Austrian Academy of SciencesVienna Biocenter (VBC)Dr Bohr‐Gasse 3Vienna1030Austria
| | | | - Hans de Jong
- Laboratory of GeneticsWageningen UniversityWageningenthe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Knief U, Hemmrich-Stanisak G, Wittig M, Franke A, Griffith SC, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W. Fitness consequences of polymorphic inversions in the zebra finch genome. Genome Biol 2016; 17:199. [PMID: 27687629 PMCID: PMC5043542 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1056-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inversion polymorphisms constitute an evolutionary puzzle: they should increase embryo mortality in heterokaryotypic individuals but still they are widespread in some taxa. Some insect species have evolved mechanisms to reduce the cost of embryo mortality but humans have not. In birds, a detailed analysis is missing although intraspecific inversion polymorphisms are regarded as common. In Australian zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), two polymorphic inversions are known cytogenetically and we set out to detect these two and potentially additional inversions using genomic tools and study their effects on embryo mortality and other fitness-related and morphological traits. Results Using whole-genome SNP data, we screened 948 wild zebra finches for polymorphic inversions and describe four large (12–63 Mb) intraspecific inversion polymorphisms with allele frequencies close to 50 %. Using additional data from 5229 birds and 9764 eggs from wild and three captive zebra finch populations, we show that only the largest inversions increase embryo mortality in heterokaryotypic males, with surprisingly small effect sizes. We test for a heterozygote advantage on other fitness components but find no evidence for heterosis for any of the inversions. Yet, we find strong additive effects on several morphological traits. Conclusions The mechanism that has carried the derived inversion haplotypes to such high allele frequencies remains elusive. It appears that selection has effectively minimized the costs associated with inversions in zebra finches. The highly skewed distribution of recombination events towards the chromosome ends in zebra finches and other estrildid species may function to minimize crossovers in the inverted regions. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1056-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Knief
- Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany. .,Current address: Division of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Biology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
| | - Georg Hemmrich-Stanisak
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Michael Wittig
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Andre Franke
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Simon C Griffith
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.,School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, 2057, Australia
| | - Bart Kempenaers
- Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Forstmeier
- Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, 82319, Seewiesen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Largest Paracentric Inversion, the Highest Rate of Recombinant Spermatozoa. Case Report: 46,XY, inv(2)(q21.2q37.3) and Literature Review. Balkan J Med Genet 2015; 17:55-62. [PMID: 25741216 PMCID: PMC4347478 DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2014-0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Carriers of inversions involving euchromatic regions are at risk of having unbalanced offspring due to meiotic crossover. In carriers, recombination can occur during gametogenesis and cause genetically unbalanced sperm and subsequently unbalanced embryos. Here we present segregation analysis results of an infertile male with 46,XY,inv(2) (q21.2q37.3) using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on sperm cells. This is the largest paracentric inversion (PAI) reported so far in a meiotic segregation analysis study. Sperm FISH revealed 28.0% recombinant spermatozoa rate for chromo-some 2, which was the highest rate in PAI carriers in the literature. Our results indicate a clear correlation between the size of the inverted segment and the frequency of the recombinant spermatozoa. The results of the FISH analysis with the information of unbalanced spermatozoa rate can provide accurate counseling on the genetic risk of infertility.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bhatt SS, Manvelyan M, Moradkhani K, Hunstig F, Mrasek K, Puechberty J, Lefort G, Sarda P, Weise A, Liehr T, Pellestor F. Inverted segment size and the presence of recombination hot spot clusters matter in sperm segregation analysis. Cytogenet Genome Res 2013; 142:145-9. [PMID: 24217531 DOI: 10.1159/000356142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- S S Bhatt
- Institute of Human Genetics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weise A, Mrasek K, Klein E, Mulatinho M, Llerena JC, Hardekopf D, Pekova S, Bhatt S, Kosyakova N, Liehr T. Microdeletion and microduplication syndromes. J Histochem Cytochem 2012; 60:346-58. [PMID: 22396478 DOI: 10.1369/0022155412440001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The widespread use of whole genome analysis based on array comparative genomic hybridization in diagnostics and research has led to a continuously growing number of microdeletion and microduplication syndromes (MMSs) connected to certain phenotypes. These MMSs also include increasing instances in which the critical region can be reciprocally deleted or duplicated. This review catalogues the currently known MMSs and the corresponding critical regions including phenotypic consequences. Besides the pathogenic pathways leading to such rearrangements, the different detection methods and their limitations are discussed. Finally, the databases available for distinguishing between reported benign or pathogenic copy number alterations are highlighted. Overall, a review of MMSs that previously were also denoted "genomic disorders" or "contiguous gene syndromes" is given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Weise
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Jena, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Molekularzytogenetische Methoden und Array-Diagnostik in der Pränatalmedizin. MED GENET-BERLIN 2011. [DOI: 10.1007/s11825-011-0308-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
In der pränatalen Diagnostik kommen aktuell neben zytogenetischen Standardverfahren vermehrt molekulare Methoden zum Einsatz. Während die molekulare Zytogenetik im Rahmen der Fluoreszenz-in-situ-Hybridisierungs(FISH)-Technik seit Jahren routinemäßig in der invasiven vorgeburtlichen Diagnostik eingesetzt wird, wird die Array-Diagnostik gerade erst in dieses Feld eingeführt. FISH wird pränatal meist zur Bestimmung der Größe eines Zellmosaiks, zum Mikrodeletionsausschluss oder zur Abklärung von strukturellen Chromosomenaberrationen durchgeführt. Die Array-CGH („comparative genomic hybridization“, komparative genomische Hybridisierung) wird eher zurückhaltend verwendet, zumeist zur weiterführenden Abklärung bei sonographisch auffälligen Feten und zur Bruchpunktbestimmung bei zytogenetisch nachgewiesenen chromosomalen Umbauten. In Zukunft wird die Array-CGH sicher noch weiter an Bedeutung gewinnen, stellt aber bereits jetzt schon eine wertvolle Ergänzung zu den diagnostischen Verfahren der Zytogenetik und der bisher verwendeten molekulargenetischen Methoden dar.
Collapse
|
12
|
Paskulin GA, Riegel M, Machado Rosa RF, Graziadio C, Gazzola Zen PR. Interstitial deletion of 7q31.32 → q33 secondary to a paracentric inversion of a maternal chromosome 7. Eur J Med Genet 2010; 54:181-5. [PMID: 21056704 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2010.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2010] [Accepted: 10/29/2010] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Carriers of paracentric inversions (PAIs) are usually asymptomatic. However, such inversions may lead to the formation of recombinant gametes and then to an abnormal gestation. Here we report a girl with a 7q31.32 → q33 deletion secondary to a maternal PAI of chromosome 7. This finding was confirmed through FISH and whole-genome array-CGH analyses. The deficiency of the chromosome 7 observed in our patient was never described before and we did not find any known gene localized within the deficient segment that could be related to her findings of hypoplastic iliac bones, hypoplastic labia minora and postaxial polydactyly. This case highlights the fact that rare viable recombinants can be developed from PAIs, an issue that must be discussed in the genetic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Adriano Paskulin
- Clinical Genetics, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA) and Complexo Hospitalar Santa Casa de Porto Alegre (CHSCPA), RS, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Weise A, Mrasek K, Ewers E, Mkrtchyan H, Kosyakova N, Liehr T. Diagnostic applications of fluorescence in situ hybridization. EXPERT OPINION ON MEDICAL DIAGNOSTICS 2009; 3:453-60. [PMID: 23485212 DOI: 10.1517/17530050902841948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays are indispensable in diagnostics and research. Routine application of this so-called molecular cytogenetic technique on human chromosomes started in 1986. Since then, a huge variety of different approaches for chromosomal differentiation based on FISH has been described. It was established to characterize marker chromosomes identified in conventional banding analysis as well as cryptic rearrangements not resolved by standard cytogenetics. OBJECTIVE/METHOD Even though molecular cytogenetics, like banding cytogenetics for almost 40 years, is often called dead now, it offers unique possibilities of single cell analysis. Thus, a review is presented here on the available diagnostic-relevant FISH methods and probe sets applied in routine pre- and postnatal clinical as well as tumor cytogenetics. CONCLUSION Molecular cytogenetics is a fast, straightforward and reliable tool that is indispensable in cytogenetic diagnostics. It is and will continue to be of high clinical impact in diagnostics, especially in the overwhelming majority of routine cytogenetic laboratories that cannot afford and do not need high-throughput chip-based platforms for their daily work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Weise
- Institut für Humangenetik und Anthropologie, Postfach, D 07740 Jena, Germany +0049 3641 935530 ; +0049 3641 935502 ;
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|