The pathology of islets in diabetes

NIH Initiative to Improve Understanding of the Pancreas, Islet, and Autoimmunity in Type 1 Diabetes: The Human Pancreas Analysis Program (HPAP)

Type 1 diabetes risk can reliably be predicted by markers of autoimmunity, but approaches to prevent or modify the underlying disease process are needed. We posit this void fundamentally results from a limited understanding of immune-islet cell interactions within the pancreas and relevant immune organs, contributions of β-cells to their own demise, and epigenetic predispositions affecting both immune and islet cells. Because biopsy of the human pancreas and pancreatic lymph nodes carries risk and the pancreas begins to autodigest soon after death, detailed cellular and molecular phenotyping of the human type 1 diabetes pancreas is lacking, limiting our understanding of the mechanisms of β-cell loss. To address these challenges, the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases established the Human Pancreas Analysis Program (HPAP) to procure human type 1 diabetes pancreata for an extensive array of tissue-based, cellular, and epigenetic assays aimed at critical knowledge gaps in our understanding of the local immune attack and loss of β-cells. In this Methodology Review, we describe how HPAP is performing detailed islet and immune cell phenotyping and creating publicly available data sets with the goals of an improved understanding of type 1 diabetes and the development of more effective treatments to prevent or reverse the disease.

Impact of C-Peptide Status on the Response of Glucagon and Endogenous Glucose Production to Induced Hypoglycemia in T1DM

CONTEXT

Complete loss of β-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) may lead to an increased risk of severe hypoglycemia.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the impact of C-peptide status on glucagon response and endogenous glucose production (EGP) during hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM.

DESIGN AND SETTING

We conducted an open, comparative trial.

PATIENTS

Ten C-peptide positive (C-pos) and 11 matched C-peptide negative (C-neg) patients with T1DM were enrolled.

INTERVENTION

Plasma glucose was normalized over the night fast, and after a steady-state (baseline) plateau all patients underwent a hyperinsulinemic, stepwise hypoglycemic clamp with glucose plateaus of 5.5, 3.5, and 2.5 mmol/L and a recovery phase of 4.0 mmol/L. Blood glucagon was measured with a specific and highly sensitive glucagon assay. EGP was determined with a stable isotope tracer technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Impact of C-peptide status on glucagon response and EGP during hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

Glucagon concentrations were significantly lower in C-pos and C-neg patients than previously reported. At baseline, C-pos patients had higher glucagon concentrations than C-neg patients (8.39 ± 4.6 vs 4.19 ± 2.4 pmol/L, P = 0.016, mean ± standard deviation) but comparable EGP rates (2.13 ± 0.2 vs 2.04 ± 0.3 mg/kg/min, P < 0.391). In both groups, insulin suppressed glucagon levels, but hypoglycemia revealed significantly higher glucagon concentrations in C-pos than in C-neg patients. EGP was significantly higher in C-pos patients at hypoglycemia (2.5 mmol/L) compared with C-neg patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Glucagon concentrations and EGP during hypoglycemia were more pronounced in C-pos than in C-neg patients, which indicates that preserved β-cell function may contribute to counterregulation during hypoglycemia in patients with T1DM.

CXC Chemokine Ligand 10 Neutralization Suppresses the Occurrence of Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice through Enhanced β Cell Proliferation without Affecting Insulitis

We have shown that neutralization of IFN-inducible protein 10/CXCL10, a chemokine for Th1 cells, breaks Th1 retention in the draining lymph nodes, resulting in exacerbation in Th1-dominant autoimmune disease models induced by immunization with external Ags. However, there have been no studies on the role of CXCL10 neutralization in Th1-dominant disease models induced by constitutive intrinsic self Ags. So, we have examined the effect of CXCL10 neutralization using a type 1 diabetes model initiated by developmentally regulated presentation of beta cell Ags. CXCL10 neutralization suppressed the occurrence of diabetes after administration with cyclophosphamide in NOD mice, although CXCL10 neutralization did not significantly inhibit insulitis and gave no influence on the trafficking of effector T cells into the islets. Because both CXCL10 and CXCR3 were, unexpectedly, coexpressed on insulin-producing cells, CXCL10 was considered to affect mature and premature beta cells in an autocrine and/or paracrine fashion. In fact, CXCL10 neutralization enhanced proliferative response of beta cells and resultantly increased beta cell mass without inhibiting insulitis. Thus, CXCL10 neutralization can be a new therapeutic target for beta cell survival, not only during the early stage of type 1 diabetes, but also after islet transplantation.