The House-Brackmann system and assessment of corneal risk in facial nerve palsy

Ocular factors predicting requirement for corneal protective oculoplastic surgery

BACKGROUND

Currently there is no universally agreed schema for predicting ocular morbidity in facial nerve palsy. The House Brackmann Scale has limitations in assessing ocular morbidity from facial nerve palsy. Our aim was to create a scoring system to help quantify ocular morbidity to aid in decision making regarding the need for corneal protective oculoplastic surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a large cohort study observing 606 patients attending the specialist facial palsy clinic in Manchester UK between March 2002 and October 2017. Retrospective multivariate analysis identified clinical predictors for the 316 patients that required oculoplastic surgery. β coefficients generated in the multivariate analysis helped formulate a new facial nerve palsy scoring instrument to predict the need for corneal protective oculoplastic surgery.

RESULTS

The House Brackmann Scale, corneal lagophthalmos and loss of corneal sensation proved clinically significant predictors for requiring corneal protective oculoplastic surgery. The scoring system derived from these factors provided an accurate and repeatable prediction tool demonstrated by validation studies on our patient population. The area under the ROC curve for the multivariate prediction model was 0.769 (0.726, 0.811). A score of 5 points out of a possible 8 was the best cut off score to recommend oculoplastic surgery, giving a sensitivity of 0.750 and a specificity of 0.671.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that corneal lagophthalmos, corneal sensation and the House Brackmann Scale are important in predicting the need for corneal protective oculoplastic surgery. Our scoring tool is an important clinical decision tool for ophthalmic and ENT colleagues.

Ocular involvement in facial nerve paralysis: risk factors for severe visual impairment and ocular surface exposure in 1870 patients

PURPOSE

To identify the risk factors associated with the development of ocular surface exposure and severe visual impairment (SVI) in patients with facial nerve palsy (FNP).

METHODS

Ocular data of all consecutive FNP patients (N = 1870) presenting to an eye-care network over the past 10 years were reviewed. Risk factors associated with SVI (best-corrected visual acuity <20/200) and ocular surface exposure at presentation were evaluated using multivariate analysis and odds ratios (OR).

RESULTS

The prevalence of SVI was 15%, and 47% had ocular surface exposure at the first presentation. The presence of corneal scar (28% vs. 10.2%, p < .001; OR 3.05), corneal ulcer (12.9% vs. 2.3%, p < .001; OR 4.67), older age at presentation (p < .001; OR 1.02), >10 mm lagophthalmos (p < .001; OR 8.7), male sex, and duration of FNP (p = .021; OR 1) were independent risk factors for developing SVI. Of the 893 eyes with ocular surface exposure, 75 (3.9%) had a corneal ulcer, and 11 (0.6%) were perforated, with the rest having epithelial defects and punctate keratopathy. Patients with neoplastic etiology (15.9% vs. 5.7%; p < .001; OR 2.39), lagophthalmos (49% vs. 29.7%; p < .001; OR 2.25) and poor Bell's phenomenon (9.4% vs. 4.2%; p = .005; OR 1.8) had twofold risk for developing ocular surface exposure.

CONCLUSION

Eyes with lagophthalmos, poor Bell's phenomenon, and FNP of neoplastic etiology have a higher risk of developing ocular surface exposure. Male sex, increasing age, longer duration of FNP, and >10 mm lagophthalmos are associated with SVI in FNP patients; hence, early and timely intervention is necessary.

Neuro-Ophthalmic Complications of Vestibular Schwannoma Resection: Current Perspectives

Vestibular schwannomas (VSs), also called acoustic neuromas, are benign intracranial neoplasms of the vestibulocochlear (VIII) cranial nerve. Management options include “wait-and-scan,” stereotactic radiosurgery and surgical resection. Due to the proximity of the VIII nerve to the facial (VII) nerve in the cerebello-pontine angle, the VII nerve is particularly vulnerable to the effects of surgical resection. This can result in poor eye closure, lagophthalmos and resultant corneal exposure post VS resection. Additionally, compression from the tumor or resection can cause trigeminal (V) nerve damage and a desensate cornea. The combination of an exposed and desensate cornea puts the eye at risk of serious ocular complications including persistent epithelial defects, corneal ulceration, corneal vascularization, corneal melting and potential perforation. The abducens (VI) nerve can be affected by a large intracranial VS causing raised intracranial pressure (a false localizing sign) or as a result of damage to the VI nerve at the time of resection. Other types of neurogenic strabismus are rare and typically transient. Contralaterally beating nystagmus as a consequence of vestibular dysfunction is common post-operatively. This generally settles to pre-operative levels as central compensation occurs. Ipsilaterally beating nystagmus post-operatively should prompt investigation for post-operative cerebrovascular complications. Papilledema (and subsequent optic atrophy) can occur as a result of a large VS causing raised intracranial pressure. Where papilledema follows surgical resection of a VS, it can indicate that cerebral venous sinus thrombosis has occurred. Poor visual function following VS resection can result as a combination of all these potential complications and is more likely with larger tumors.

Clinician and Automated Assessments of Facial Function Following Eyelid Weight Placement

Importance

Quantitative assessment of facial function is difficult, and historic grading scales such as House-Brackmann have well-recognized limitations. The electronic, clinician-graded facial function scale (eFACE) allows rapid regional analysis of static, dynamic, and synkinetic facial function in patients with unilateral facial palsy within the course of a clinical encounter, but it relies on clinician assessment. A newly developed, machine-learning algorithm (Emotrics) provides automated, objective facial measurements but lacks clinical input (ie, recognizing laterality of facial palsy or synkinesis).

Objectives

To compare the sensitivity of a clinician-based tool (eFACE) to a well-established intervention for facial palsy (eyelid weight placement) with an automated facial-measurement algorithm (Emotrics).

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective review was conducted of the most recent 53 patients with unilateral facial palsy who received an eyelid weight at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Facial Nerve Center from 2014 to 2017. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were deidentified and randomized. The entire cohort was analyzed by 3 clinicians, as well as by the Emotrics program.

Main Outcomes and Measures

eFACE scores of the palpebral fissure at rest (0, wide; 100, balanced; 200, narrow), with gentle eyelid closure (0, incomplete; 100, complete), and with forceful eyelid closure (0, incomplete; 100, complete) before and after eyelid weight placement were compared with palpebral fissure measurements by Emotrics.

Results

Of the 53 participants, 33 were women, and mean (SD) age was 44.7 (18) years. The mean (SD) eFACE scores and Emotrics measurements (in millimeters) before vs after eyelid weight placement of the palpebral fissure at rest (eFACE, 84.3 [15.9] vs 109.7 [21.4]; Emotrics, 10.3 [2.2] vs 9.1 [1.8]), with gentle eyelid closure (eFACE, 65.9 [28.0] vs 92.1 [15.4]; Emotrics, 4.4 [2.7] vs 1.3 [2.0]), and with forceful eyelid closure (eFACE, 75.1 [28.6] vs 97.0 [10.7]; Emotrics, 3.0 [3.1] vs 0.5 [1.3]) all significantly improved. Subgroup analysis of patients with expected recovery (eg, Bell palsy) (n = 40) demonstrated significant development of ocular synkinesis on eFACE (83.9 [22.7] vs 98.9 [4.4]) after weight placement, which could also explain the improvement in eyelid function. The scores of patients with no expected recovery (n = 13) improved in both eFACE and Emotrics analysis following eyelid weight placement, though results did not reach significance, likely limited by the small subgroup size.

Conclusions and Relevance

The eFACE tool agrees well with automated, objective facial measurements using a machine-learning based algorithm such as Emotrics. The eFACE tool is sensitive to spontaneous recovery and surgical intervention, and may be used for rapid regional facial function assessment from a clinician's perspective following recovery and/or surgical intervention.

Level of Evidence

4.

Ophthalmic Complications Following Acoustic Neuroma Resection

BACKGROUND

Past studies have shown high rates of ocular complications with the need for ophthalmic surgery following acoustic neuroma resection (ANR).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates of ophthalmic complications, referrals, and surgery following ANR, and the factors associated with poor outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective study of ophthalmic outcomes in patients who underwent ANR was conducted, following institutional review board approval. Surgical approach, tumor size, tumor characteristics, completeness of resection, postoperative House-Brackmann grades, ocular complications, referrals to ophthalmology, and ophthalmic treatments were recorded.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2012, 174 patients underwent ANR. There were 3 surgical groups: retrosigmoid (n = 97), translabyrinthine (n = 59), and combined retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine (n = 18). Median tumor size was 2.2 cm. Postoperatively, 30% of patients had facial nerve dysfunction (House-Brackmann ≥3), which recovered to 19% by 1 mo and 8.6% by 1 yr following ANR. Fifty-six (32.9%) patients experienced ocular complications postoperatively, with lagophthalmos, dry eye, and blurry vision as the most common complications. Thirty-six (67.9%) of the patients who required ophthalmic treatment were managed nonsurgically, with just 13 (7.6%) patients requiring referral to an ophthalmologist. In total, only 9 (5.3%) patients received an ophthalmic procedure. Patients with tumors &gt;2 cm, those undergoing combined retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine resection, and those with severe facial nerve dysfunction which did not improve in the first month following surgery were more likely to have poor ophthalmic outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We present lower rates of ophthalmic complications following ANR than previously reported. Improved surgical technique, better postoperative eye care, and facial nerve monitoring most likely accounted for the improved ocular outcomes.

Unilateral facial paralysis occurring in an infant with enteroviral otitis media and aseptic meningitis

We report the case of a four month old infant presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) with irritability and facial asymmetry following a recent bout of gastroenteritis. Physical examination revealed a unilateral peripheral facial nerve paralysis. Common in older children and adults, facial nerve palsy has rarely been described in infancy. Although historically associated with a variety of inflammatory and infectious causes, the pathogenesis remains unclear. In this infant we were able to successfully identify an underlying acute enteroviral infection. Coxsackie B5 was isolated from the middle ear fluid, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), nasopharyngeal and rectal swabs. After myringotomy drainage of the middle ear fluid and placement of pneumatic equalization tubes, there was rapid and complete resolution of facial paralysis.