Anatomical and subjective success rates of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy over a seven-year period

Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using Markov modelling

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

METHODS

We constructed a Markov model in which patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction received endoscopic DCR or no surgery. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, 1-way sensitivity analyses, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate for model sensitivity to multiple model inputs.

RESULTS

Endoscopic DCR was found to be cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$2162 per quality-adjusted life-year. The model was most sensitive to the health utility deduction from epiphora. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found endoscopic DCR to be cost-effective over no surgery 93.7% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic DCR is a cost-effective treatment for patients with epiphora. The model is very sensitive to the negative effect epiphora has on quality of life. With the advancement of health care technology and surgical techniques, the success rates of endoscopic DCR continue to improve and to be an even more efficacious and economical treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Success and complications of endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy vs. external dacryocystorhinostomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the success and complications of endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy (ELDCR) vs. external dacryocystorhinostomy (ExDCR) in primarily acquired nasal duct obstruction. The search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases revealed 109 studies on ELDCR and ExDCR. Eleven studies were found to be suitable for review. The primary objective was to compare the success rate between ELDCR and ExDCR. The secondary objectives were to analyze the surgical time, overall complications, bleeding, infection, intranasal synechia, and granulation tissue. Pooled analysis of all studies revealed that ELDCR had a significantly lesser success rate compared to ExDCR (80.3% vs. 91.6%; odds ratio [OR] 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.27, 0.62]; P < 00001; I2 = 13%). However, there were no difference in the overall complication rate (12.0% vs. 13.0%; OR 1.04; 95% CI [0.17, 6.33]; P = 0.97, I2 = 80%) and intranasal synechiae (9.5% vs. 4.3%; OR 2.22 [1.04, 4.72]; P = 0.04; I2 = 10%). The ExDCR group had significantly increased risks of bleeding (1.9% vs. 13.0%; OR 0.20; 95% CI [0.09, 0.47]; P = 0.0002; I2 = 0%) and infection (0.3% vs. 4.6%; OR 0.09; 95%CI [0.02, 0.51]; P = 0.006; I2 = 0%). Nevertheless, ELDCR needed a shorter surgical time compared to ExDCR (mean difference [MD] -28.35, 95% CI [-35.45, -21.26], P < 0.00001, I2 = 78%). Although ELDCR is associated with lesser bleeding, lesser infection, and shorter surgical duration, the success rate of ExDCR is higher.

Comparing the success rate of external dacryocystorhinostomy with anterior flap versus flap excision in managing chronic dacryocystitis

Background

Nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is characterized by epiphora and recurrent episodes of acute dacryocystitis. Despite the temporary effect of antibiotics in the acute phase, it is primarily managed by dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). There is a new modification of external DCR that is performed without either anterior or posterior flaps. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of flapless and single-flap external DCR in adult patients with chronic symptomatic dacryocystitis secondary to NLDO.

Methods

In this retrospective, non-randomized, interventional, comparative study of patients with chronic dacryocystitis secondary to primary acquired NLDO, we compared the surgical outcomes and complication rates of flapless external DCR to those of external DCR with only anterior flap suturing. We excluded patients who declined participation and those with soft stops, nasal problems, lid margin abnormalities, lid malposition or laxity, previous lacrimal surgery, lacrimal fistula, trauma involving the lacrimal drainage system, lack of adequate follow-up, or severe septal deviation or turbinate hypertrophy. Anatomical and functional success rates were determined at the last follow-up visit and were compared. Postoperative complications were recorded and compared between groups.

Results

We included 53 patients with a male-to-female ratio of 16 (30.2%) to 37 (69.8%); 25 eyes underwent flapless DCR (group 1) and 28 eyes underwent anterior flap suturing DCR (group 2). The two groups had comparable demographic characteristics (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, anatomical (92.0% in group 1 and 92.9% in group 2) and functional (84.0% in group 1 and 92.9% in group 2) success rates at final follow-up were comparable between groups (both P > 0.05). At the one-month postoperative examination, premature tube extrusion was more often reported in group 1 (12.0%) compared to group 2 (7.1%). At the two-month follow-up examination, tube extrusion was noted in 4.0% in group 1 and 0.0% in group 2, yet the difference failed to attain statistical significance (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

We found that neither surgical method was superior in terms of anatomical or functional success rate at a maximum of one year after external DCR. Flapless DCR is a simple, effective, and reproducible alternative to the single anterior flap suturing technique for managing NLDO in adults with chronic dacryocystitis. However, further randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are recommended before generalization can be justified.

Role of anaesthesia in endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy: A meta-analysis of 3282 cases

Distal acquired lacrimal obstruction is a common adulthood pathology whose primary treatment is represented by EXT-DCR and END-DCR. When considering their influencing factors, the role of the type of anaesthesia applied during these surgeries has a major role. The aim of this study is to systematically analyse the influence of general and local/regional anaesthesia on the final success rates of EXT-DCR and END-DCR. Primary EXT-DCR and END-DCR articles published later than 2000 with at least 50 single clinician procedures were selected. Exclusion criteria included acute dacryocystitis, tumours, studies focussing on revision surgeries, surgeries with adjunctive procedures, not clearly demarcated surgeons, mixed cohort study of acquired and congenital disorders. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with MOOSE guidelines; where feasible, a meta-analysis of the collected results was conducted. As a result, 11,445 articles were selected of which 2741 were examined after screening, and 16 included after full text review (0.6% of the initial papers). Among all papers included, the number of EXT-DCR was not enough to provide a solid analysis of the effect of anaesthesia; conversely, a significant difference of success rate was noted between local anaesthesia + sedation (85.1%, IC 77.8%-90.4%), and general anaesthesia (90.8%, IC 88.8%-92.4%) in END-DCR (p = 0.048). In conclusion, END-DCR performed with general anaesthesia should be considered as the solution of choice; however, local anaesthesia, eventually associated with a sedation, can be used as an alternative in selected cases. No meaningful conclusions could be drawn for EXT-DCR, due to the lack of data.

Outcome of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Nasal and Lacrimal Sac Mucosal Flaps

Purpose: In patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction, the outcomes of surgery were evaluated according to the type or presence of flaps. Methods: In total, 509 eyes were compared retrospectively: 178 eyes in patients treated without flaps, 126 eyes in patients treated using nasal mucosa flaps, and 205 eyes in the patient group using nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap were compared retrospectively. We analyzed the factors of success according to the surgical method by comparing granulation and bony ostium obstruction at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery in each group. Results: At 6 months after surgery, granulation was found in 6 eyes (2.93%) in the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap group, 5 eyes (3.96%) in the nasal mucosal flap group, and 15 eyes (8.42%) in the group treated without flaps. Bony ostium obstruction was found in 3 eyes (1.46%) in the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap group, 4 eyes (2.38%) in the nasal mucosal flap group, and 6 eyes (2.81%) in the group treated without flaps. The anatomical surgical success rate of patients treated with nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flaps was 95.61%, which was higher than those of patients treated with nasal mucosal flaps (92.86%) and without flaps (88.20%). The functional and anatomical surgical success rate was 94.15% in the group treated with nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flaps, 88.89% in the group treated with nasal mucosal flaps, and 84.83% in the group treated without flaps. Conclusions: Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy using the nasal and lacrimal sac mucosal flap is an effective method that minimizes the risk of granulation and bony ostium obstruction.

Changes in Eyelid Position Following Silicone Tube Insertion and Removal in Dacryocystorhinostomy

AIMS

The authors sought to assess the changes in eyelid position after silicone tube insertion and removal in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 60 eyes of 48 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy operation at Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea, between April 2019 and November 2019. All cases were evaluated to discern eyelid positioning, focusing on the marginal reflex distance 1, medial palpebral fissure, central palpebral fissure (PF-2), lateral palpebral fissure (PF-3), and medial canthal angle (MCA) before surgery and at 1 week and 1, 2, 3, and 4 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (25%) were operated on bilaterally and 36 patients (75%) were operated on unilaterally. The average patient age was 56.5 years and 9 men (18.8%) and 39 women (81.3%) were included in this study. At 2 months postoperatively, all values of interest (marginal reflex distance 1 , medial palpebral fissure, PF-2, PF-3, and MCA) had decreased significantly (P < 0.05, Friedman test), but the changes in PF-3 immediately after surgery were not significant (P = 0.062, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). From 2 to 3 months after surgery, all 5 indicators of interest increased significantly. After silicone tube removal, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in medial palpebral fissure, PF-3, and marginal reflex distance 1 values; the changes in PF-2 and MCA values as compared with before surgery was 0.47 mm (P = 0.02, Wilcoxon test) and 3.25° (P = 0.000, Wilcoxon test), respectively, which was significantly different. However, with these small gaps, it will be difficult to notice the changes in PF-2 and MCA values during clinical examination.

CONCLUSION

Insertion of a silicone tube during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy leads to temporary deformation of the lid position. However, after silicone tube removal, all eyelids recovered to their original shape.

Influence of Surgical Techniques on Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

Endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (END-DCR) has increased as a valid alternative to the classic external approach to treat distal lacrimal obstruction. Different surgical varieties of the END-DCR approach have been proposed with no clear understanding of the best surgical technique.

Data Source

A comprehensive research was performed in PubMed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases with a final search on March 2020.

Review Methods

The aim of this search was to identify relevant END-DCR procedures performed with mechanical (Mecn-END-DCR) and powered (Pow-END-DCR) approaches to compare their functional success rate. In addition, the influence of mucosal flaps was evaluated. Articles were selected only if they were published later than 2000 and had at least 50 single-clinician surgical procedures performed. Excluded articles included acute infections, cancers, mixed cohort study, and revision cases.

Results

A total of 11,445 publications were identified and 2741 reviewed after screening; 15 articles were included after full-text review (0.6% of the initial articles reviewed). The mean success rate was 91.34% (95% CI, 87.1%-94.3%) for Pow-END-DCR and 89.5% (95% CI, 86.5%-91.9%) for Mecn-END-DCR with no significant difference between the surgical approaches ( P = .43). For mucosal flaps performed during END-DCR, the mean success rate was 89% (95% CI, 86%-91%) if mucosal flaps were used and 92% (95% CI, 88%-95%) if they were not used, with no statistical difference present ( P = .14).

Conclusions

Our analyses suggest that there are no differences in outcomes between mechanical and powered approaches in END-DCR and that mucosal flap preservation is not essential to achieve a superior END-DCR outcome.

Impact of Post-Surgical Therapies on Endoscopic and External Dacryocystorhinostomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Epiphora is a common ophthalmologic sign that is most commonly caused by distal acquired lacrimal obstruction. Recent data have demonstrated that external dacryocystorhinostomy (EXT-DCR) and endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (END-DCR) can be considered the treatments of choice. However, different post-surgical medical therapies are available and are currently used to improve surgical outcomes, although no direct comparison has been performed.

Objective

To analyse the influence of post-surgical medical treatments on END-DCR and EXT-DCR outcomes.

Methods

A structured search was conducted using the U.S. National Library of Medicine (PubMed), EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases with a final search performed in May 2020. The research identified papers published later than 2000 with at least 50 single clinician procedures performed in EXT-DCR and END-DCR. Articles that studied acute infections, revision cases, mixed cohort studies of acquired and congenital obstruction, and tumour were excluded. The influence of systemic antibiotic/steroids, local application of mitomycin C, nasal/ocular antibiotic, nasal/ocular steroids and nasal decongestants was analysed.

Results

In total, 11,445 papers were selected, 2,741 of which were reviewed after screening, and 18 included after full text review (0.6% of the initial articles reviewed) which involved 3,590 procedures. Considering the low number of publications on EXT-DCR, statistical analysis of post-surgical therapy was not feasible. In END-DCR, the analyses were performed only for nasal steroids (p = 0.58), oral antibiotics (p = 0.45) and nasal decongestant (p = 0.27), which demonstrated no meaningful influence. Given the variable association between adjunctive medical therapies, pharmacologic molecular heterogeneity and modality/concentration of application, these results should be considered critically. Additionally, no differences were seen for application of silicone stenting, whereas, no statistical analysis was performed for mitomycin C.

Conclusions

Given the high success rate of EXT-DCR and END-DCR and the heterogeneity of literature data, the effective influence of post-surgical medical therapy is difficult to identify. Future large prospective randomized studies could help in detecting the optimal adjunctive therapy for these surgeries.

Long-term results of maintenance of lacrimal silicone stent in patients with functional epiphora after external dacryocystorhinostomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term outcomes of maintenance of lacrimal silicone stent for the management of functional epiphora after anatomically patent external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 101 eyes of 75 patients who were diagnosed to have functional epiphora after external DCR from 2005 to 2014. Functional epiphora was defined as epiphora that persisted or recurred even after patent DCR confirmed by a lacrimal irrigation test. Secondary silicone intubation was indicated when the patients wanted a further intervention. The stent was intended to be kept in situ unless there was a stent-related complication or the patient wanted removal.

RESULTS

In total, 34 of 75 patients (45.3%, 52 eyes) who agreed to the intervention underwent secondary silicone intubation. The success rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery were 96.2%, 75.5%, and 70.2%, respectively. At the final follow-up (mean 72.7 ± 26.4 months), 32 (61.5%) eyes chose to retain the silicone tube: silicone stent was well maintained without epiphora and complications once inserted in 18 eyes (34.6%), whereas tube replacement was needed in 14 eyes (26.9%) because of nasal crust or whitish plaque formation on the tube surface. In 13 cases (25.0%), silicone stent was removed because of tube-related complications, and the most common complication was canaliculitis (n = 8, 15.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary intubation and maintenance of the stent is an effective and simple procedure for functional epiphora. The main obstacle to long-term maintenance is tube-associated canaliculitis.

Correlation between nasal mucosal thickness around the lacrimal sac fossa and surgical outcomes in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

Objectives To identify the relationship between surgical success rate and preoperative nasal mucosal thickness around the lacrimal sac fossa, as measured using computed tomography. Methods We reviewed 33 eyes from 27 patients who underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy after diagnosis of primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction and who were followed-up with for at least six months between 2011 and 2014. We measured preoperative nasal mucosal thickness around the bony lacrimal sac fossa using computed tomography and analyzed patient measurements after classifying them into three groups: the successfully operated group, the failed operation group, and the non-operated group. Results Surgery failed in six of the 33 eyes because of a granuloma at the osteotomy site and synechial formation of the nasal mucosa. The failed-surgery group showed a clinically significantly greater decrease in nasal mucosal thickness at the rearward lacrimal sac fossa compared with the successful-surgery group. However, nasal mucosal thickness of fellow eyes (i.e., non-operated eyes) was not significantly different between the two groups, and the location of the uncinate process did not appear to influence mucosal thickness. In the failed group, posteriorly located mucosal thickness of operated eye fossa was thinner than that of the non-operated eyes, but not significantly so. Conclusions Our results from this quantitative anatomical study suggest that nasal mucosal thickness is a predictor of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy results.

Anatomic landmarks in lacrimal surgery from an ophthalmologist's point of view: Clinical findings of external dacryocystorhinostomy and dacryoendoscopy

Epiphora is a common clinical symptom of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. However, it is present in several pathologies and can lead to decreased quality of life for patients. A careful clinical examination including a detailed patient's history and diagnostic tests such as the fluorescein dye disappearance test and diagnostic syringing of the lacrimal duct are essential. Depending on the time of presentation (congenital, primary, or secondary acquired), grade (subtotal or total) and location of the stenosis, different surgical approaches can be considered. These are subdivided into minimally invasive (transcanalicular) and anastomosing (dacryocystorhinostomy) procedures. Furthermore, the anatomical landmarks and the site of surgical intervention differentiate the surgical techniques into endoscopic or transcutaneous. Modern intubation techniques offer a large spectrum of therapeutic possibilities enabling patient care to be customized and individualized. Knowledge of the topographical anatomy is crucial for achieving greater success and a lower complication rate. Clin. Anat. 30:1034-1042, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.