Incidence and risk factors for cystoid macular edema following scleral buckling

Effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor on early-stage post-vitrectomy macular edema in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy on post-vitrectomy macular edema (PVME) and determine the risk factors for PVME recovery.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 179 eyes of 179 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy and developed PVME within 3 months after surgery. Eyes were grouped according to postoperative anti-VEGF treatment.

RESULTS

Central retinal thickness (CRT) decreased significantly from baseline to 3-month follow-up in groups with (509.9 ± 157.2 μm vs. 401.2 ± 172.1 μm, P < 0.001) or without (406.1 ± 96.1 μm vs. 355.1 ± 126.0 μm, P = 0.008) postoperative anti-VEGF treatment. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) did not differ between the two groups during follow-up. In the group not receiving anti-VEGF therapy, BCVA was significantly improved at 1, 2, and 3 months (P = 0.007, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively), while in the anti-VEGF group, BCVA was significantly improved at 1 and 3 months (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001). A thicker baseline CRT (β = 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.61; P < 0.001) was significantly associated with decreasing CRT.

CONCLUSION

PVME tends to spontaneously resolve in the early postoperative period. The effect of anti-VEGF therapy in the first 3 months after diagnosis appears to be limited.

Risk Factors Associated with Cystoid Macular Edema among Patients Undergoing Primary Repair of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

PURPOSE

To investigate predictors of the development and resolution of cystoid macular edema (CME) after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross sectional study.

SUBJECTS

Patients who underwent primary repair of uncomplicated RRD.

METHODS

Demographics, ophthalmic history, visual acuity, RRD features, time to development/resolution of CME, OCT characteristics of CME/epiretinal membrane (ERM), type of surgery, and treatments were collected. Logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of CME development and resolution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Predictors of CME development and resolution.

RESULTS

A total of 708 eyes were included, of which 55 (7.8%) developed CME. Factors associated with an increased risk of CME development included total number of retinal detachment surgeries (odds ratio [OR] 1.66 [1.24-2.23], P < 0.001), prior intraocular surgery (OR 4.43 [1.19-16.51], P = 0.03), and presence of ERM after surgery (OR 4.49 [2.30-8.74], P < 0.001). Patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) were more likely to develop CME compared with patients undergoing scleral buckling (SB; OR 3.09 [1.18-8.10], P = 0.02). A longer average time to CME detection was associated with lower CME resolution (OR 0.94 [0.89-0.998], P = 0.04). In patients who developed an ERM postsurgically, those who developed CME after ERM had a lower rate of resolution compared with those who developed CME before ERM (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Cystoid macular edema may be more likely to develop in patients undergoing PPV than SB, those who underwent more surgeries for RRD repair, those who had prior intraocular surgery, or those who developed an ERM after RRD repair. Resolution of CME may be affected by the time to detection of CME and ERM development.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Macular oedema secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: risk factors for resistance to first-line therapy and long-term response to dexamethasone intravitreal implant

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risk factors for resistance to first-line therapy and long-term response to dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) of patients with macular oedema (MO) secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair (RRDR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, consecutive cohort study conducted in patients who underwent RRDR between January 2014 and December 2020 in the Rothschild Foundation Hospital and experienced postoperative MO (POMO) with a follow-up of at least 18 months.

RESULTS

Of the 1152 patients screened, 36 eyes (3.1%) experienced POMO. The mean follow-up duration was 45.2 months (18.0-80.5 months). Twenty-five eyes (69.4%) were resistant to first-line therapy and received at least one Ozurdex® injection (mean number: 2.7 [1-12]). The multivariate analysis showed an increased risk of resistance in patients who underwent perfluorocarbon liquid (PFCL)-assisted drainage (adjusted odds ratio: 8.65; 95% confidence interval: 1.97-15.33; p = 0.01). Significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity and central macular thickness were found between before Ozurdex® injection and the last follow-up visit: from 0.57 ± 0.47 LogMAR to 0.34 ± 0.32 LogMAR (p = 0.02) and from 483.0 ± 124.0 µm to 354.6 ± 96.5 µm (p = 0.001), respectively. The absence of serous retinal detachment and the presence of hyperreflective foci at baseline were associated with a higher resistance and a poorer response to Ozurdex®. Two patients (8%) experienced hypertony, that was well controlled with hypotonic drops.

CONCLUSION

MO secondary to RRDR is challenging. Ozurdex® could be reasonably proposed as first-line treatment, at least when MO occurs following PFCL-assisted drainage, given the favourable long-term benefit/risk ratio.

A Case of Incidental and Uncomplicated Subretinal Triamcinolone Acetonide

Introduction

Posterior subtenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide (PSTA) is commonly done to treat refractory cases of macular edema. Complications may arise from the procedure as well as from the use of the periocular steroid medications. Side effects include subconjunctival hemorrhage, progression of cataract, scleral perforation (resulting in subretinal, subhyaloid, or intravitreal injection of the drug), retinal detachment, ptosis, orbital fat prolapse, orbital abscess, infectious scleritis, ocular hypertension, and scleral abscess. Here we describe a case of inadvertent subretinal triamcinolone acetonide (TA) deposition from a PSTA procedure without any adverse vision-threatening outcomes.

Case Presentation

We report a patient who presented with a history of superior temporal left eye macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, which was successfully repaired with a scleral buckle (SB), pars plana vitrectomy, and gas placement. Due to persistent diplopia, the SB was removed after 1 year post-operatively. Due to the development of cystoid macular edema, a PSTA was performed after the patient failed topical steroids and NSAIDs. The procedure was halted early due to unexpected resistance during the injection. A dilated fundus exam showed the presence of subretinal triamcinolone acetonide. The patient was observed and found to have no complications with almost complete resolution of the triamcinolone acetonide after 3 months.

Conclusion

In previous SB patients, it is important to highlight the risk of globe penetration, subretinal deposition of TA, formation of retinal breaks, or reopening of prior retinal breaks with posterior subtenon injection, which could have adverse effects on the local retina as well as the risk of retinal detachment.

Postoperative complications after successful primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors for cystoid macular edema (CME) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) development after surgery for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort study involving 62 consecutive patients with primary RRD who underwent RRD repair with either scleral buckling (SB) or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). SB was used in young phakic patients without posterior vitreous detachment (PVD), high myopic patients, and RRD associated with either anterior or inferior retinal tears. PPV was preferred over SB in pseudophakic patients or those with media opacity and posterior breaks that precluded the SB approach. After surgery, the macular changes, including CME and ERM development, were evaluated 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were performed in phakic patients where media opacity or lens bulging did not allow the surgeon to perform surgical maneuvers. The inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was randomly performed in the macula-off and the macula-on RRD "pending foveal detachment" subgroup.

RESULTS

Sixty-two eyes affected by RRD who underwent SB or PPV were enrolled. CME occurred in 33.3% of the PPV group regardless of the ERM formation. No CME cases were found in the SB group. Macula-off RRD increased the risk of CME by odds ratio (OR) = 4.3 times compared to macula-on RRD regardless of the surgical procedure (p = 0.04). Macula-off status increased the risk of CME of OR = 1.73 times compared to macula-on in the PPV subgroup (p = 0.4). Combined cataract surgery and PPV increased the risk of CME by OR = 3.3 times (p = 0.16) compared to PPV alone, and ILM peeling increased the risk of postoperative CME by OR = 1.8 times (p = 0.37). ERM occurred in 28% of patients who did not undergo ILM peeling, and 29.42% of those who underwent ILM peeling developed ERM (p = 0.6).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of postoperative CME was higher in patients with macula-off than in macula-on RRD and in those with macula-off RRD who underwent PPV. The SB would be advisable in patients with RRD sparing the macula. Furthermore, despite having several advantages, the combined phacoemulsification plus IOL implantation and PPV highly increased the risk of postoperative CME.

Surgical Success Rate of Scleral Buckling Surgery and Postoperative Incidence of Cystoid Macular Edema: 10 Years of Experience at a Single Academic Hospital

The purposes of this study were to report the surgical success rate of scleral buckling surgery (SB) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in a single academic hospital, analyze the incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME) after SB using optical coherence tomography (OCT), and reveal the factors associated with the development of CME. This was a retrospective observational study of patients with RRD who underwent SB from 2010 to 2020 in a single academic hospital. The anatomical success was initially achieved in 267 of 288 eyes (92.7%), and finally achieved in 288 eyes (100%). After excluding 17 eyes that underwent vitrectomy for reoperations, a total of 271 eyes of 267 patients (173 men; age, 43.5 ± 16.9 years) were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the incidence of postoperative CME. CME occurred in 6 of 271 eyes (2.2%) within 3 months after initial surgery. Pseudophakic and aphakic eyes appeared more likely to develop CME (chi-squared test: p = 0.0078). Five of the six cases with postoperative CME were able to be medically treated. Scleral buckling surgery showed a high success rate even in the era of small-gauge vitreous surgery, and the postoperative frequency of CME after SB was low (2.2%). Previous cataract surgery may be associated with the development of postoperative CME, which is mostly medically manageable.

Scleral Buckling Alone or in Combination with Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair: A Meta-Analysis of 7212 Eyes

PURPOSE

The efficacy and safety of scleral buckling (SB) versus combination SB and pars plana vitrectomy (SB+PPV) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify comparative studies published from Jan 2000-Jun 2021 that reported on the efficacy and/or safety following SB and SB+PPV for RRD repair. Final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) represented the primary endpoint, while reattachment rates and ocular adverse events were secondary endpoints. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Across 18 studies, 3912 SB and 3300 SB+PPV eyes were included. Final BCVA was non-significantly different between SB and SB+PPV (20/38 vs. 20/66 Snellen; WMD=-0.11 LogMAR; 95%CI [-0.29,0.07]; P=0.23). Primary reattachment rate was similar between procedures (P=0.74); however, SB alone achieved a significantly higher final reattachment rate (97.40% vs. 93.86%; RR=1.03; 95%CI [1.00,1.06]; P=0.04). Compared to SB+PPV, SB alone had a significantly lower risk of postoperative macular edema (RR=0.69; 95%CI [0.47,1.00]; P=0.05) and cataract formation (RR=0.34; 95%CI [0.12,0.96]; P=0.04). The incidence of macular hole, epiretinal membrane, residual subretinal fluid, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, elevated intraocular pressure, and extraocular muscle dysfunction were similar between SB and SB+PPV.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in final BCVA between SB+PPV and SB alone in RRD. SB alone offers a slightly higher final reattachment rate along with a reduced risk of macular edema and cataract. Primary reattachment rate and the incidence of other complications were similar between the two procedures.

Incidence and risk factors for macular oedema after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery: a prospective single-centre study

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of cystoid macular oedema (CME) diagnosed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) after primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery.

METHODS

From April 2016 to October 2017, 150 eyes of 150 patients presenting with primary RRD were included consecutively in this prospective single-centre study. Patients with the following characteristics were excluded: previous vitreoretinal surgery, combined cataract surgery, preoperatively presentation with any intraocular or systemic inflammatory condition, visible macular oedema or epiretinal membrane (ERM) on funduscopy. SD-OCT (Spectralis, Heidelberg Engineering) was conducted 3 and 6 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-eight of the 150 patients completed the study, of whom 107 (age: 61.7 ± 11.5 years, mean ± SD) showed successful retinal attachment during follow-up visits. The most frequent operation method was scleral buckling (54.2%), followed by vitrectomy (25.2%) and the combination of both techniques (20.6%). Postoperative SD-OCT revealed CME, neurosensory detachment and ERM in 18.7, 31.8 and 32.7% of all cases, respectively. The risk of postoperative CME was significantly elevated in patients with ERM (42.9 versus 6.9%, p < 0.001). In addition, patients with initial detachment of the macula had more postoperative CME (26.5 versus 11.1%, p = 0.044). BCVA improvement was significantly lower in patients with CME compared to patients without 6 weeks after surgery for macula-on RRD.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study confirmed that postoperative CME is a frequent complication after RRD surgery; we identified ERM and macula-off RRD as potential risk factors. As CME potentially delays visual recovery, postoperative follow-ups should include SD-OCT.

Scleral Buckling: A Review of Clinical Aspects and Current Concepts

Scleral buckling represents a valuable treatment option for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. The surgery is based on two main principles: the closure of retinal breaks and the creation of a long-lasting chorioretinal adhesion. Buckles are placed onto the sclera with the purpose of sealing retinal breaks. Cryopexy is usually performed to ensure a long-lasting chorioretinal adhesion. Clinical outcomes of scleral buckling have been shown to be more favorable in phakic eyes with uncomplicated or medium complexity retinal detachment, yielding better anatomical and functional results compared with vitrectomy. Several complications have been described following scleral buckling surgery, some of which are sight-threatening. Expertise in indirect ophthalmoscopy is required to perform this type of surgery. A great experience is necessary to prevent complications and to deal with them. The use of scleral buckling surgery has declined over the years due to increasing interest in vitrectomy. Lack of confidence in indirect ophthalmoscopy and difficulties in teaching this surgery have contributed to limiting its diffusion among young ophthalmologists. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive guide on technical and clinical aspects of scleral buckling, focusing also on complications and their management.

Increased risk of postsurgical macular edema in high stage idiopathic epiretinal membranes

PURPOSE

To assess the rate of occurrence and the risk factors of postsurgical macular edema (PSME) in eyes with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) or full-thickness macular hole (FTMH).

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal analysis of all subjects scheduled for vitrectomy with or without combined cataract surgery over a 6-month period. Electronic medical charts and imaging data were analyzed preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

From 101 patients diagnosed with iERM or FTMH, 71 patients were eligible for the study. Forty-nine eyes with iERM (69.0%) and 22 eyes with FTMH (31.0%) underwent vitrectomy either isolated (31.0%) or combined with cataract extraction (69.0%). The overall rate of PSME was 26.7%, without differences between the two groups (P = 0.9479). Combined cataract extraction did not affect the overall occurrence of PSME rate in both groups (P = 0.9255 in FTMH and P = 0.8658 in iERM). If grouped by stage, eyes with stage 4 iERM though disclosed an increased rate of PSME (57.1%) compared to lower (1 to 3) stages (14.3%, P = 0.0021), particularly when combined with cataract surgery (71.4% vs. 15.4% in stages ≤ 3, P = 0.0021). The PSME odds ratio for a stage 4 iERM is 8 (95% CI: 1.933-33.1; P = 0.0041) compared to stages 3 and below.

CONCLUSIONS

PSME remains a clinically relevant and frequent event after surgery for iERM and FTMH. Patients with stage 4 iERM have an 8-fold higher likelihood of developing PSME in a 6-month postsurgical period compared to iERM in 1-3 stages, especially when combined with cataract extraction.

Risk Factors for Presence of Cystoid Macular Edema following Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery

Purpose: Cystoid macular edema (CME) following cataract surgery is a well-known entity. Less is known regarding the risk factors of developing CME following repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD).Methods: This was a multi-institutional study of primary RRD surgeries from 1/1/2015 through 12/31/2015. The primary outcome was the development of postoperative CME following RRD surgery. Post-operative optical coherence tomography imaging and 3 months of follow-up following RRD repair were required.Results: There were 1,466 eyes that met the inclusion criteria, and 140 (9.6%) developed postoperative CME following primary RRD repair. On multivariate analysis, the statistically significant metrics were older patient age (OR 1.03 per year, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05), pre-operative proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR, OR 1.74, 95% 1.03 to 2.95), and cataract surgery following RRD repair (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.25). Single surgery success was protective against CME (OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.14-0.30). Seventy-six (9.0%) of the phakic eyes and 60 (9.9%) of the pseudophakic eyes developed post-operative CME. Multivariate analysis showed that cataract surgery following RRD repair (p < .0001) for phakic eyes and older age (p = .0075) for pseudophakic eyes were risk factors. In eyes that underwent successful retinal reattachment with one surgery, post-operative cataract surgery (p = .0005) and pre-operative PVR (p = .0011) were risk factors for CME in this subgroup.Conclusion: CME occurred in nearly 10% of the eyes following RRD repair. The biggest risk factors were recurrent RRD, preexisting PVR, older age, and cataract surgery following RRD repair.

Macular edema after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair: risk factors, OCT analysis, and treatment responses

PURPOSE

To investigate risk factors, imaging characteristics, and treatment responses of cystoid macular edema (CME) after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair.

METHODS

Consecutive, retrospective case-control series of patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and/or scleral buckling (SB) for RRD, with at least six months of follow-up. Clinical and surgical parameters of patients with and without CME (nCME), based on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), were compared.

RESULTS

Of 99 eyes enrolled, 25 had CME while 74 had nCME. Patients with CME underwent greater numbers of surgeries (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for number of surgeries, macula-off RRD (P = 0.06), proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (P = 0.09), surgical approach (PPV and/or SB, P = 0.21), and tamponade type (P = 0.10) were not statistically significant, although they all achieved significance on univariate analysis (P = 0.001 or less). Intraoperative retinectomy (P = 0.009) and postoperative pseudophakia or aphakia (P = 0.008) were more frequent in the CME group, even after adjustment. Characteristics of cCME on OCT included diffuse distribution, confluent cysts, and absence of subretinal fluid or intraretinal hyperreflective foci. Macular thickness improved significantly with intravitreal triamcinolone (P = 0.016), but not with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (P = 0.828) or dexamethasone implant (P = 0.125). After adjusting for number of surgeries and macular detachment, final visual acuities remained significantly lower in the CME vs nCME group (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Risk factors of CME include complex retinal detachment repairs requiring multiple surgeries, and pseudophakic or aphakic lens status. Although this cCME was associated with poor therapeutic response, corticosteroids were the most effective studied treatments.

Management of Cystoid Macular Edema After Vitrectomy for Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To assess therapies for cystoid macular edema (CME) following pars plana vitrectomy for proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 42 eyes developing CME after PVR surgery. Treatments included topical therapy, sub-Tenon's triamcinolone acetonide (STTA), intravitreal bevacizumab and combinations thereof. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as well as central subfield thickness (CST) were tracked.

RESULTS

Mean Snellen BCVA improved from 20/598 to 20/297 (logMAR change -0.21; confidence interval [CI], -0.39 to -0.03; P = .03). Mean CST improved from 448 µm to 260 µm (CI, -248.70 to -126.06; P < 0.01). There was no difference in efficacy between treatment subgroups (analysis of variance, P = 0.16, 0.43), but STTA yielded statistically significant improvement in both categories (CI, -0.79 to -0.11; P = 0.01; and CI, -333.74 to 166.51; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of CME following PVR surgery is possible with a variety of different options. STTA appears to yield anatomical and visual improvement. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2020;51:436-443.].

Macular optical coherence tomography findings after vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

The primary aim of this study was to summarize and illustrate the main structural cross-sectional optical coherence tomography findings encountered after vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. This was a non-systematic review of literature on structural cross-sectional optical coherence tomography findings after vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Adequate illustrations of the main findings described were found after a retrospective analysis of imaging and charts of patients operated at the department where this study was performed. The main structural cross-sectional optical coherence tomography findings after vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment included persistent subretinal fluid, subretinal blebs, retinal folds, subretinal perfluorocarbon liquids, macular alterations related to silicone oil, epiretinal membranes, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, cystoid macular edema, macular holes, and recurrent retinal detachment. In conclusion, optical coherence tomography was a useful tool after vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Some optical coherence tomography findings may not be evident on fundus examination, and optical coherence tomography can reveal essential details for the clinical management and the visual prognosis. Other findings, despite being visible on funduscopic examination, may be better assessed with the aid of optical coherence tomography. All these elements contribute to support the importance of tomographic assessment in the follow-up of eyes treated for vitreoretinal conditions.