SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract

Contrast Sensitivity and Low Contrast Visual Acuity in Children With Normal Visual Acuity

PURPOSE

To measure and report the distribution of distance and near contrast sensitivity (CS) and low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) at 5% and 2.5% contrast in children aged 5-15 years with normal visual acuity (VA).

DESIGN

Prospective, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Schools in Southern India.

STUDY POPULATION

One thousand fifty-two children aged 5 to 15 years (mean age 10.61 ± 2.85 years) with a presenting visual acuity of 0.00 logMAR or better in both eyes and a stereo acuity of 40 seconds of arc or better were recruited from nine schools. Repeatability of contrast sensitivity and low contrast visual acuities were tested in 246 children. Pelli-Robson charts were used to measure the distance and near contrast sensitivity at 1 m and 40 cm, respectively. The low contrast visual acuity was recorded at 5% and 2.5% contrast using LEA Symbols at 3 m.

RESULTS

Overall, the mean ± SD, (95% CI) monocular distance and near CS were 1.75 ± 0.11 (1.76-1.75) logCS and 1.72 ± 0.10 (1.73-1.71) logCS, respectively. The mean LCVA at 5% and 2.5% contrasts were 0.20 ± 0.10 (0.21-0.20) logMAR and 0.39 ± 0.11 (0.40-0.39) logMAR, respectively. Distance and near CS gradually improved till the ages of 11 and 13, respectively, and then plateaued. Similarly, LCVA at 5% and 2.5% contrasts gradually improved till age ten before plateauing. The Coefficient of Repeatability (CoR) for CS was ±0.02 logCS for distance, ±0.05 logCS for near, and ±0.01 logMAR for both LCVA contrasts.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides age-specific normative values for distance and near CS, and LCVA in a cohort of children aged 5-15 years. These results are important to understand the impact of ocular conditions on CS in children and have utility in clinical evaluations.

Converting LEA to Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score in neuro-ophthalmology patients

PURPOSE

The Pelli-Robson and LEA contrast sensitivity charts are commonly used in clinical settings to measure contrast sensitivity. Although the Pelli-Robson chart is considered the gold standard, it is limited by its bulky size. The LEA chart, on the contrary, offers a more practical and portable option that is still reliable. This has led to questions about whether we can predict Pelli-Robson scores based on LEA scores. This study developed a conversion method to help transition from the LEA chart to the Pelli-Robson chart and validate the conversion score.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed the relationship between LEA and the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test. Our study examined a total of 120 eyes. We developed a conversion table through the equipercentile equating method. Subsequently, we assessed the reliability and accuracy of this algorithm for converting LEA results into Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity scores.

RESULTS

The study used a conversion table to convert LEA scores to Pelli-Robson scores. The conversion table achieved a reliability of 0.91 based on intraclass correlation, and the algorithm had an accuracy of 81.6% within a 1-point difference from the raw score.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reported a reliable and comparable conversion algorithm for transforming LEA scores into converted estimated Pelli-Robson scores, thereby improving the usefulness of existing data in both clinical and research contexts.

Test-retest repeatability and agreement of the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test: towards the validation of a new clinical endpoint

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate test-retest reliability and agreement of the quantitative contrast sensitivity function test (qCSF) in the retina clinic.

METHODS

A total of 121 right eyes of 121 patients were tested and consecutively re-tested with qCSF in the retina clinic. Outcomes included area under the logarithm of contrast sensitivity function curve (AULCSF), contrast acuity, and contrast sensitivity thresholds at 1-18 cycles per degree (cpd). Test-retest means were compared with paired t-test, variability was compared with the Brown-Forsythe test, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots evaluated reliability and agreement.

RESULTS

Mean test-retest differences for all qCSF metrics ranged from 0.02 to 0.05 log units without statistically significant differences in variability. Standard deviations ranged from 0.08 to 0.14. Coefficients of repeatability ranged from 0.16 to 0.27 log units. ICC > 0.9 for all metrics except 1cpd (ICC = 0.84, all p < 0.001); AULCSF ICC = 0.971.

CONCLUSION

qCSF-measured contrast sensitivity shows great test-retest repeatability and agreement in the retina clinic.

Clinical report: Virtual reality enables comparable contrast sensitivity measurements to in-office testing (pilot study)

SIGNIFICANCE

Vision health disparities largely stem from inaccessibility to vision specialists. To improve patient access to vision tests and to expedite clinical workflows, it is important to assess the viability of virtual reality (VR) as a modality for evaluating contrast sensitivity.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the validity of a VR version of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test by comparing its results with those of the corresponding in-office test.

METHODS

Twenty-eight participants (mean ± standard deviation age, 37.3 ± 20.5 years) with corrected vision were recruited for testing on a voluntary basis with randomized administration of the in-office test followed by the VR analog or vice versa. Nineteen participants took each test twice to assess test-retest consistency in each modality. Virtual reality tests were conducted on a commercial Pico Neo Eye 2 VR headset, which has a 4K screen resolution. The environment for both tests was controlled by the participant for location and lighting.

RESULTS

Similar sensitivity scores were obtained between testing modalities in both the right (n = 28 participants; Wilcoxon match-paired signed rank [SR], p=0.7) and left eyes (n = 28 participants; Wilcoxon match-paired SR, p=0.7). In addition, similar test-retest scores were found for VR (n = 19 participants; Wilcoxon match-paired SR, p=1.0) or in-office (n = 19 participants; Wilcoxon match-paired SR, p=1.0) tests. Virtual reality Pelli-Robson results correlated well with in-office test results in variably diseased participants (n = 14 eyes from 7 participants, R2 = 0.93, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot trial, we demonstrated that VR Pelli-Robson measurements of corrected vision align with those of in-office modalities, suggesting that this may be a reliable method of implementing this test in a more interactive and accessible manner.

Visual function tests for glaucoma practice - What is relevant?

Glaucoma represents one of the most important ocular diseases causing irreversible ganglion cell death. It is one of the most common causes of visual impairment and morbidity in the elderly population. There are various tests for measuring visual function in glaucoma. While visual field remains the undisputed method for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring disease progression, other tests have been studied for their utility in glaucoma practice. This review discusses some of the commonly used tests of visual function that can be routinely used in clinics for glaucoma management. Among the various modalities of testing visual function in glaucoma, this review highlights the tests that are most clinically relevant.

Test-retest Repeatability of the Ohio Contrast Cards

SIGNIFICANCE

The Ohio Contrast Cards are a repeatable test of contrast sensitivity, and they reveal higher contrast sensitivity for low-vision patients than is shown by the Pelli-Robson chart.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the contrast sensitivity results and test/retest ±limits of agreement for the Ohio Contrast Cards and the Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity chart on two challenging groups of participants, and to compare the Ohio Contrast Card results with grating acuity and the Pelli-Robson results with letter acuity.

METHODS

The Ohio Contrast Card and Pelli-Robson tests were each performed twice by two different examiners within one visit on 40 elder patients in Primary Vision Care (>65 years old) and 23 to 27 low-vision school-aged students. Grating acuity was measured using the Teller Acuity Cards (all participants), and letter acuity was measured using ClearChart (elders) or the Bailey-Lovie chart (students).

RESULTS

The ±95% limits of agreement were similar for the Ohio Contrast Cards and the Pelli-Robson chart. The elders' limits of agreement were ±0.27 (Ohio Contrast Cards) and ±0.28 (Pelli-Robson); the students' limits of agreement were ±0.42 (Ohio Contrast Cards) and ±0.51 (Pelli-Robson). However, Ohio Contrast Card results were 0.41 log10 Michelson units more sensitive than the Pelli-Robson chart (over one line on the Pelli-Robson chart) for the elders and 0.90 log10 Michelson units (three lines on the Pelli-Robson chart) more sensitive for the elders (0.11 and 0.6 log10 Weber units, respectively). The Pelli-Robson results were correlated with letter acuities and Ohio Contrast Card results for both groups, and the Ohio Contrast Card results were correlated with Teller Acuity Card acuities for the elders.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ohio Contrast Cards and Pelli-Robson chart are similarly repeatable. Both contrast sensitivity tests can provide additional clinical information that is not available through visual acuity testing, and Ohio Contrast Card may provide additional information not available from the Pelli-Robson chart.

Contrast Sensitivity Loss in Patients With Posttreatment Lyme Disease

Purpose

Posttreatment Lyme disease (PTLD) is marked by neurologic symptoms, cognitive impairment, and significant symptom burden, including fatigue and ocular complaints. The purpose of this study was to determine whether contrast sensitivity (CS) is altered in patients with PTLD compared with healthy controls and, second, whether CS is associated with cognitive and/or neurologic deficits.

Methods

CS was measured using a Pelli-Robson chart with forced-choice procedures, and the total number of letters read was recorded for each eye. CS impairment was defined for age <60 years as logCS of 1.80 (36 letters or fewer) and for those age ≥60 years as logCS of 1.65 (33 letters or fewer). Participants self-administered a questionnaire to assess presence of ocular symptoms and underwent a neurologic exam and battery of neurocognitive tests.

Results

CS impairment was associated with an increased odds of being in the PTLD group that was 2.6 times as high as those without CS impairment (odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-5.2). Neither cases nor controls had significant distance acuity impairment. CS impairment was not associated with any of the ocular complaints in cases but was borderline associated with neurologic abnormalities and cognitive impairment.

Conclusions

CS impairment in patients with PTLD is linked to signs of cognitive and neurologic impairment and may be a marker of illness severity.

Translational Relevance

Further investigation into the value of testing CS impairment in PTLD cases is warranted, especially if it is an indicator of cognitive or neurologic manifestations.

Effects of Citicoline, Homotaurine, and Vitamin E on Contrast Sensitivity and Visual-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Preliminary Study

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of supplementation with a fixed combination of citicoline 500 mg, homotaurine 50 mg, and vitamin E 12 mg (CIT/HOMO/VITE) on contrast sensitivity and visual-related quality of life in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in mild stage. This was a multicenter, observational, cross-over, short-term, pilot study on POAG patients with stable controlled intraocular pressure (IOP). Patients were randomly assigned to Group 1 (current topical therapy for 4 months and then current topical therapy plus CIT/HOMO/VITE for 4 months) or Group 2 (CIT/HOMO/VITE in addition to current topical therapy for 4 months and then topical therapy alone for 4 months). Best-corrected visual acuity, IOP, visual field, and the Spaeth/Richman contrast sensitivity (SPARCS) test score were recorded at baseline and after 4 and 8 months. The Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 (GQL-15) questionnaire was administered at each check time. Forty-four patients were assigned to Group 1 and 65 to Group 2. Over the follow-up period, there were no significant changes in IOP or visual field findings, whereas SPARCS and GQL-15 findings significantly varied from baseline, both being improved in subjects treated with CIT/HOMO/VITE fixed combination. These results demonstrate that a daily intake of a fixed combination of citicoline, homotaurine, and vitamin E in addition to the topical medical treatment significantly increased the total score of the contrast sensitivity test and the quality of life in patients with POAG.

Lighting conditions and perceived visual function in ophthalmic conditions

PURPOSE

To determine the influence of different lighting conditions on perceived visual function in patients of different age, gender, race, and in various ophthalmic diseases.

METHODS

A prospective study. A survey given to patients seen in general ophthalmic and retina clinics. Patients were asked four questions: Is your vision better, worse, or the same in (1) bright light vs dim light, (2) indoors or outdoors, (3) beginning or end of the day, and (4) sunny or cloudy day? Parameters tested were age, race, gender, visual acuity, and a variety of ophthalmic conditions. Multivariable models for each question were fit using multinomial regression. Association was considered significant if p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 722 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients with lower vision (LogMAR ≥ 0.3) were more likely to indicate they either had better vision indoors or outdoors compared with better vision patients (LogMAR < 0.1). Patients with pseudophakia were also more likely to indicate they had better vision on a cloudy day (OR = 1.9). White patients had double the odds of selecting bright light compared with others. Males were less likely than females to indicate better vision indoors (OR = 0.62). There were no significant associations with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in the multivariable model.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients did not note any difference in lighting conditions, and although there is explanatory rational for some of the findings in this study, those questions concerning lighting conditions or time of day are not useful for screening of disease. Gender and ethnicity were found to have associations with lighting preferences which needs to be further studied.

Contrast Sensitivity and Glaucoma

Spatial contrast sensitivity decline occurs in different types and stages of glaucoma. In this short review we discuss methods of assessing contrast sensitivity, the role of contrast sensitivity in the pathogenesis of glaucoma and its practical application in clinical practice.

Visual function evaluation for low vision patients with advanced glaucoma

This study aimed to compare various visual function parameters for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of patients with advanced glaucoma with low vision.In total, 44 eyes of advanced glaucoma patients with low vision were included in this cross-sectional study. A moving pattern edge band program was used to assess edge detection ability and the low vision quality-of-life (LVQOL) questionnaire was used for evaluating QOL scores of subjects. Correlation analyses between QOL scores and visual functional parameters including pattern edge band unit, visual acuity (VA), and Mean deviation (MD) of perimetry were performed. The areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of diverse visual functional parameters were calculated.VA and pattern edge band unit were related to LVQOL score in all subjects. For patients with a decimal VA lower than 0.1, only the pattern edge band showed a significant correlation with the QOL associated with distant activities (P = .031). However, the MD of perimetry was not related to the QOL score. After sorting subjects into 2 groups according to the LVQOL score, VA and pattern edge band unit were significantly different (P < .01 and P = .029, respectively). The AUROC for edge detection ability using pattern edge band was higher than MD of perimetry.Assessment of edge detection ability using pattern edge band was meaningful for predicting QOL associated with visual performance in patients with far-advanced glaucoma. For these patients, edge detection could be used as an additional parameter for visual function with traditional VA and perimetry.

Development and Validation of a Smartphone-based Contrast Sensitivity Test

Purpose

Contrast sensitivity (CS) testing is an important measure of visual function reflecting variations in everyday visual experience in different conditions and helps to identify more subtle vision loss. However, it is only infrequently used. To make this more accessible, we have developed and validated a smartphone-based CS test.

Methods

A new tumbling-E smartphone-based CS test was developed, Peek Contrast Sensitivity (PeekCS). This was field tested and refined through several iterations. Reference standard was a tumbling-E Pelli-Robson CS test (PRCS). The validation study was conducted in community clinics in Ethiopia. Test-retest variability was measured for both PRCS and PeekCS. PRCS and PeekCS were then compared. Correlation coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated; 95% limits of agreement were calculated and displayed on Bland-Altman plots.

Results

PeekCS showed strong repeatability (correlation coefficient: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91–0.95), which was comparable with PRCS (correlation coefficient: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.95–0.97). The 95% limit of agreement for test-retest variability of PRCS and PeekCS were −0.20 to 0.21 and −0.31 to 0.29, respectively. PRCS and PeekCS were highly correlated: 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93–0.95); 95% limits of agreement −0.27 to 0.29; and mean difference 0.010 (95% CI: −0.001 to 0.022). PeekCS had a faster testing time (44.6 seconds) than PRCS (48.6 seconds): mean difference −3.98 (95% CI: −5.38 to −2.58); P < 0.001.

Conclusions

The smartphone-based PeekCS is a repeatable and rapid test, providing results that are highly comparable with the commonly used PRCS test.

Translational Relevance

PeekCS provides an accessible and easy to perform alternative for CS testing, particularly in the community setting.

The effect of reduced contrast sensitivity on colour vision testing

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of reduced contrast sensitivity on three commonly used colour vision tests in order to establish key discrepancies that may be relevant for clinical practice.

METHODS

A prospective non-interventional clinical study of colour vision testing using three commonly used devices: Ishihara and Hardy-Rand-Rittler (H-R-R) pseudoisocochromatic plate tests, and Farnsworth D-15 arrangement test performed under progressively reduced contrast sensitivity conditions achieved with a neutral density filter bar.

RESULTS

The Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity (PRCS) at which 5% of the population should first experience a 10% reduction in colour vision testing from baseline was calculated for each of the three colour vision devices: Farnsworth D-15 test: 1.81 log contrast sensitivity (CS), H-R-R test: 1.69 log CS, and Ishihara test: 1.34 log CS. Single factor repeated measures analyses, conducted separately at each contrast sensitivity level, revealed no difference between the colour vision testing devices at PRCS ≥1.80 log CS (P ≥ 0.367). However, in all PRCS ≤1.65 log CS, the differences were statistically significant (all P ≤ 0.004), demonstrating a significantly lower percentage of errors in the Ishihara test compared with both the Farnsworth D-15 (P < 0.023) and H-R-R (P < 0.035) tests.

CONCLUSIONS

At high contrast sensitivities, all colour vision tests function almost equally; however, at decreased levels of contrast sensitivity, H-R-R and Farnsworth D-15 are more greatly affected.

Preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a consolidated update regarding preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Visual acuity alone is a poor gauge of cataract disability. Modalities such as wave front aberrometry, lens densitometry, and light-scatter assessments can quantify optical aspects of cataract and may prove clinically useful in surgical evaluation. Advances in biometry are driving improvements in refractive outcomes, which in turn have increased patient expectations. Future advances in biometry technology may include three-dimensional imaging of the cornea and lens. Screening for ocular comorbidities has become increasingly important, particularly to guide lens selection. Risk stratification systems can help guide surgical decisions and may decrease intraoperative complication rate. A comprehensive medical history and physical is currently mandated for all Medicare patients undergoing cataract surgery but may be of limited utility for low-risk patients.

SUMMARY

Rising patient expectations and a growing number of surgical choices have expanded the cataract preoperative evaluation. A systematic and comprehensive examination which includes identifying any ocular comorbidity is essential for surgical planning and counseling on visual prognosis. New technologies will continue to inform, but not replace, sound clinical judgment.

Association of Cadmium and Lead Exposure With the Incidence of Contrast Sensitivity Impairment Among Middle-aged Adults

Importance

Contrast sensitivity (CS) is an important indicator of visual function that affects daily life, including mobility, visually intensive tasks, safety, and autonomy. Understanding the risk factors for CS impairment could prevent decreases in visual function.

Objective

To determine the incidence of and factors associated with CS impairment in a large cohort.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Beaver Dam Offspring Study is an ongoing longitudinal cohort study of aging involving adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Participants who were free of CS impairment in both eyes at baseline were included (N = 1983). Baseline data collection occurred from June 8, 2005, through August 4, 2008, when the participants ranged from 21 to 84 years of age. Two follow-up examinations occurred at 5-year intervals: one was conducted between July 12, 2010, and March 21, 2013, and the other between July 1, 2015, and November 13, 2017. Data analysis was performed from November 27, 2017, to February 27, 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Contrast sensitivity testing was conducted with Pelli-Robson letter sensitivity charts, and incident impairment was defined as a log CS score less than 1.55 in either eye at any follow-up examination. Cadmium and lead levels were measured in whole blood with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Associations between baseline characteristics and CS impairment incidence were examined using Cox proportional hazard models and quantified as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI.

Results

Of the 1983 participants included, 1028 (51.8%) were female and 955 (48.2%) were male, with a mean (SD) age of 48 (9.3) years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of CS impairment was 24.8% (95% CI, 22.9-26.8), similar in women (24.9%) and men (24.6%), and highest in the oldest age group (65-84 years) at 66.3%. In multivariable models, cadmium level in the highest quintile (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.78), older age (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.47), larger waist circumference (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.11), and more plaque sites (1-3 sites: HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.92; 4-6 sites: HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.26-6.05) were among the factors associated with increased risk, while male sex (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60-0.98) and any alcohol consumption (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.88) were associated with decreased risk. Results were similar when smoking status replaced cadmium exposure in the models. Lead level was not associated with increased risk.

Conclusions and Relevance

This study's findings suggest that incident CS impairment was common in the 10-year follow-up, with cadmium, but not lead, exposure associated with increased risk. The associations of diminished CS with other modifiable risk factors found appear to imply that changes in behavior may reduce future incidence of CS impairment.

Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the efficacy, reliability and repeatability of SPARCS (Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test) as compared to the conventional Pelli Robson Chart Test for the assessment of contrast sensitivity in patients with glaucoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated 135 eyes of 135 patients who were age and sex matched into three groups (controls, disc suspects and glaucoma) of 45 patients each. The glaucoma subgroup was further divided into subgroups of mild, moderate and severe based on the visual field damage.

RESULTS

There was a strong positive correlation between Pelli Robson scores and SPARCS scores (S = 0.807, P < 0.001). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for Pelli Robson Test was 0.952 and 0.988 for SPARCS. The coefficient of repeatability (COR) for mean SPARCS was 5.65%, while COR of Pelli Robson Test was 12.44%. SPARCS was found to have better repeatability than Pelli Robson Test based on COR values. Pelli Robson score had a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 65.6% for detecting glaucoma patients as compared to 84.4% and 70%, respectively, for SPARCS scores.

CONCLUSION

SPARCS is a better alternative to conventional Pelli Robson Chart Test for assessment of contrast sensitivity in patients with glaucoma. Being independent of the effects of literacy and educational status, it offers a universal way to measure contrast sensitivity. It can also be reliably used in patients with varying severity of glaucoma.