Uncontrolled isolated office hypertension is associated with subclinical markers of cardiovascular disease in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients

The role of ultrasonic cardiogram in the diagnosis of hypertension complicated with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Hypertension diabetes mellitus is one of the serious complications of hypertension. In this study, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and ultrasonic cardiogram (UCG) were used to investigate the cardiac changes and its influencing factors in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The ABPM, UCG, Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) of patients were examined. The comparison of HbA1c, BMI, gender, age, daytime and nighttime blood pressure, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) and E/A ratio were made between the two groups. The cardiac function of control group was better than that of group B, while that of group B was better than group A. The cardiac index level in group B was better than that in group A, but lower than that in control group. The LVMI in group A was clearly higher than group B and control group, and the incidence of LVH increased. In group A, the nocturnal systolic blood pressure was higher than control group and group B. Nocturnal diastolic blood pressure, daytime diastolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure in groups A and B were higher than those the control group. The findings indicated that hypertension complicated with type 2 diabetes mellitus can cause degeneration of the heart, and complicated with type 2 diabetes mellitus can accelerate ventricular remodeling and functional deterioration. Hypertension with type 2 diabetes mellitus are more prone to left ventricular damage.

Prognostic Importance of Resistant Hypertension in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic importance of resistant hypertension (RHT) for the development of complications in a cohort of individuals with type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 646 patients had the diagnosis of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aRHT) based on mean office blood pressure (BP) levels during the 1st year of follow-up. They were reclassified as white-coat/controlled or true/uncontrolled RHT according to 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), using the traditional BP cutoffs and the new 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) criteria. Multivariate Cox analyses examined the associations between RHT diagnoses and the occurrence of microvascular and cardiovascular complications and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 10 years, 177 patients had a cardiovascular event (145 major ones); 222 patients died (101 from cardiovascular diseases); 200 had a renal event; 156 had a retinopathy event; and 174 patients had a neuropathy event. In relation to non-RHT individuals, aRHT (present in 44.6% and 50% by the traditional and new criteria, respectively) predicted all cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, with hazard ratios (HRs) between 1.64 and 2.16, but none of the microvascular outcomes. True RHT increased the HRs (from 1.81 to 2.25) and additionally predicted renal outcomes. White-coat/controlled RHT implied an increased risk (HRs 1.33-1.86) that was intermediate between non-RHT and true RHT individuals. Classifications using the traditional and the new ACC/AHA criteria were equivalent.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 diabetes, the presence of aRHT implied an increased risk of cardiovascular and mortality outcomes, and classification based on ABPM predicted renal outcomes and improved cardiovascular/mortality risk stratification.

Prognostic impact of clinic and ambulatory blood pressure components in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients: the Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The prognostic importance of tight clinic blood pressure (BP) control is controversial in diabetic patients. The objective was to investigate the prognostic impact of clinic and ambulatory BPs for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study, 565 type 2 diabetic patients had clinical, laboratory and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) data obtained at baseline and during follow-up. The primary endpoints were a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox survival and splines regression analyses assessed associations between each BP component [SBP, DBP and pulse pressure (PP)] and the endpoints.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 5.75 years, 88 total cardiovascular events and 70 all-cause deaths occurred. After adjustments for cardiovascular risk factors, clinic SBP and DBPs were predictive of the composite endpoint but not of all-cause mortality, whereas all ambulatory BP components were predictors of both endpoints. Ambulatory systolic and PPs were the strongest predictors and achieved ambulatory BPs during follow-up improved risk prediction in relation to baseline values. When categorized at clinically relevant cut-off values, risk began only at clinic BPs at least 140/90 mmHg, whereas for ambulatory BPs it began at lower values (≥120/75 mmHg for the 24-h period).

CONCLUSION

ABPM provides more valuable information regarding cardiovascular risk stratification than office BPs and should be performed, if possible, in every high-risk type 2 diabetic patient. Achieved 24-h ambulatory BPs less than 120/75 mmHg are associated with significant cardiovascular protection and, if confirmed by other studies, may be considered as BP treatment targets.

Prognostic impact of aortic stiffness in high-risk type 2 diabetic patients: the Rio deJaneiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic importance of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), the gold standard measure of aortic stiffness, has been scarcely investigated in type 2 diabetes and never after full adjustment for potential confounders. The aim was to evaluate the prognostic impact of carotid-femoral PWV for cardiovascular morbidity and all-cause mortality in a cohort of 565 high-risk type 2 diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Clinical, laboratory, ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring, and carotid-femoral PWV data were obtained at baseline. The primary end points were a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Multiple Cox survival analysis was used to assess the associations between carotid-femoral PWV, as a continuous variable and categorized at 10 m/s, and the end points.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 5.75 years, 88 total cardiovascular events and 72 all-cause deaths occurred. After adjustments for potential cardiovascular risk factors, including micro- and macrovascular complications, ambulatory BP, and metabolic control, carotid-femoral PWV was predictive of the composite end point but not of all-cause mortality both as a continuous variable (hazard ratio 1.13 [95% CI 1.03-1.23], P = 0.009 for increments of 1 m/s) and as categorized at 10 m/s (1.92 [1.16-3.18], P = 0.012). On sensitivity analysis, carotid-femoral PWV was a better predictor of cardiovascular events in younger patients (<65 years), in those with microvascular complications, and in those with poorer glycemic control (HbA1c ≥7.5% [58.5 mmol/mol]).

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid-femoral PWV provides cardiovascular risk prediction independent of standard risk factors, glycemic control, and ambulatory BPs and improves cardiovascular risk stratification in high-risk type 2 diabetes.

Association of arterial stiffness indexes, determined from digital volume pulse measurement and cardiovascular risk factors in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Progression of atherosclerosis with increased arterial stiffness is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Compliance index (CI) derived from digital volume pulse (DVP), measuring the relationship between volume and pressure changes in fingertip, can evaluate the local arterial stiffness. The purpose of this study was to measure the stiffness of different arteries and determine the relationships of CI-DVP with clinical characteristics and renal function in CKD patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional pilot study included 186 CKD and 46 healthy subjects. Evaluation of different arterial stiffness was performed by DVP using dual-channel photoplethysmography and measured as CI (CI-DVP) and pulse wave velocity (PWV)-DVP.

RESULTS

CKD patients had lower CI-DVP and higher PWV-DVP than that in the healthy group. There was a trend of stepwise decrease in CI-DVP and increase in PWV-DVP related to the advance of CKD from early to late stage. Decrease of CI-DVP was associated with the increase in number of cardiovascular risk factors. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that CI-DVP (B = 4.59, P < 0.01) was independently associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Male gender, eGFR, and systolic blood pressure (BP) were independent determinants for CI-DVP (B = -0.25, P = 0.01; B = 0.007, P = 0.03; and B = -0.03, P < 0.0001; whole model R(2) = 0.28, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate a significant association between CI-DVP, a new surrogate marker of arterial stiffness different from PWV, and renal function and cardiovascular risk factors in CKD patients.