Frequency of D8/17 B lymphocyte alloantigen in north Indian patients with rheumatic heart disease

Anti-inflammatory treatment for carditis in acute rheumatic fever

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic heart disease remains an important cause of acquired heart disease in developing countries. Although prevention of rheumatic fever and management of recurrences have been well established, optimal management of active rheumatic carditis remains unclear. This is an update of a review published in 2003, and previously updated in 2009 and 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects, both harmful and beneficial, of anti-inflammatory agents such as aspirin, corticosteroids and other drugs in preventing or reducing further valvular damage in patients with acute rheumatic fever.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2013, Issue 9 of 12), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1948 to 2013 October Week 1), EMBASE (Ovid, 1980 to 2013 Week 41) and Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1982 to 17 October 2013). We last searched Index Medicus (1950 to April 2001) in 2001. We checked reference lists of identified studies and applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing anti-inflammatory agents (e.g. aspirin, steroids, immunoglobulins, pentoxifylline) versus placebo or controls, or comparing any of the anti-inflammatory agents versus one another, in adults and children with acute rheumatic fever diagnosed according to Jones, or modified Jones, criteria. The presence of cardiac disease one year after treatment was the major outcome criterion selected.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the methodology outlined in the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration were used.

MAIN RESULTS

No new studies were included in this update. Eight randomised controlled trials involving 996 people were selected for inclusion in the review. Researchers compared several steroidal agents such as corticotrophin, cortisone, hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, prednisone and intravenous immunoglobulin versus aspirin, placebo or no treatment. Six trials were conducted between 1950 and 1965; one was done in 1990 and the final study was published in 2001. Overall there were no observed significant differences in risk of cardiac disease at one year between corticosteroid-treated and aspirin-treated groups (six studies, 907 participants, risk ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.15). Similarly, use of prednisone (two studies, 212 participants, risk ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 2.45) compared with aspirin did not reduce the risk of heart disease after one year. Investigators in five studies did not report adverse events. The three studies reporting on adverse events reported substantial adverse events. However, all results should be interpreted with caution because of the age of the studies and the substantial risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Little evidence of benefit was found when corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulins were used to reduce the risk of heart valve lesions in patients with acute rheumatic fever. The antiquity of most of the trials restricted adequate statistical analysis of the data and acceptable assessment of clinical outcomes by current standards. In addition, risk of bias was substantial, so results should be viewed with caution. New randomised controlled trials in patients with acute rheumatic fever are warranted to assess the effects of corticosteroids such as oral prednisone and intravenous methylprednisolone and the effects of other new anti-inflammatory agents. Advances in echocardiography will allow more objective and precise assessments of cardiac outcomes.

Anti-inflammatory treatment for carditis in acute rheumatic fever

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic heart disease remains an important cause of acquired heart disease in developing countries. Although the prevention of rheumatic fever and the management of recurrences is well established, the optimal management of active rheumatic carditis is still unclear. This is an update of a review published in 2003 and previously updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of anti-inflammatory agents such as aspirin, corticosteroids, immunoglobulin and pentoxifylline for preventing or reducing further heart valve damage in patients with acute rheumatic fever.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials on The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2011), MEDLINE (1966 to Aug 2011), EMBASE (1998 to Sept 2011), LILACS (1982 to Sept 2011), Index Medicus (1950 to April 2001) and references lists of identified studies. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing anti-inflammatory agents (e.g. aspirin, steroids, immunoglobulins, pentoxifylline) with placebo or controls, or comparing any of the anti-inflammatory agents with one another, in adults and children with acute rheumatic fever diagnosed according to the Jones, or modified Jones criteria. The presence of cardiac disease one year after treatment was the major outcome criteria selected.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using methodology outlined in the Cochrane handbook.

MAIN RESULTS

No new studies were included in this update. Eight randomised controlled trials involving 996 people were included. Several steroidal agents corticotrophin, cortisone, hydrocortisone, dexamethasone and prednisone, and intravenous immunoglobulin were compared to aspirin, placebo or no treatment in the various studies. Six of the trials were conducted between 1950 and 1965, one study was done in 1990, and the final study was published in 2001. Overall there was no significant difference in the risk of cardiac disease at one year between the corticosteroid-treated and aspirin-treated groups (six studies, 907 participants, relative risk 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.15). Similarly, use of prednisone (two studies, 212 participants, relative risk 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 2.45) compared to aspirin did not reduce the risk of developing heart disease after one year. Adverse events were not reported in five studies. The three studies reporting on adverse events all reported substantial adverse events. However, all results should be interpreted with caution due to the age of the studies and to substantial risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is little evidence of benefit from using corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulins to reduce the risk of heart valve lesions in patients with acute rheumatic fever. The antiquity of most of the trials restricted adequate statistical analysis of the data and acceptable assessment of clinical outcomes by current standards. Additionally there was substantial risk of bias, so results should be viewed with caution. New randomised controlled trials in patients with acute rheumatic fever to assess the effects of corticosteroids such as oral prednisone and intravenous methylprednisolone, and other new anti-inflammatory agents are warranted. Advances in echocardiography will allow for more objective and precise assessments of cardiac outcomes.

Some of the People, Some of the Time

Acute rheumatic fever is a major cause of heart disease in large parts of the world, but it remains unknown why only a small fraction of those who are infected with rheumatogenic group A streptococci develop an abnormal immune response that leads to acute rheumatic fever. An understanding of the mechanisms underlying host susceptibility can provide important insights into pathogenesis that in turn can inform new treatments. Extensive searches for susceptibility factors have been undertaken, including human leukocyte antigens, B-cell alloantigens, and cytokine genes. Although significant associations have been found between genetic factors and acute rheumatic fever, study results often conflict with each other. This review explores current understanding about host susceptibility to acute rheumatic fever and provides an overall perspective to the number of studies that have recently addressed this subject.

B-cell antigen D8/17 is a marker of rheumatic fever susceptibility in Aboriginal Australians and can be tested in remote settings

OBJECTIVE

To test the B-cell antigen D8/17 as a marker of past rheumatic fever (RF) in a predominantly Aboriginal Australian population, and to evaluate technical modifications to allow its use in remote settings.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross-sectional survey in a remote Aboriginal community, a regional tertiary referral hospital and a tertiary paediatric centre in Melbourne.

PARTICIPANTS

106 people, including three with acute RF, 38 with a history of past RF, 20 relatives of these people, and 45 healthy controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

D8/17 expression in B cells.

RESULTS

Blood was collected from each participant and the expression of D8/17 and CD19 in each sample was analysed by flow cytometry. The mean proportion of D8/17-positive B cells was 39.3% (SD, 11.8) in patients with previous RF, 22.5% (SD, 5.2) in first-degree relatives, 11.6% (SD, 7.2) in controls, and 83.7% (SD, 10.1) in patients with acute RF (analysis of variance test between means, P = 0.001). A cut-off of 22.1% of D8/17-positive B cells to indicate past RF yielded the highest percentage of correct results (95.4%). Delayed staining of whole blood (mean, 0.55 days; SD, 0.2) gave equivalent results to immediate staining, but the D8/17 assay on peripheral blood mononuclear cells was unreliable.

CONCLUSIONS

The B-cell antigen D8/17 accurately identifies Australians with a past history of RF, and the assay is feasible in remote settings with access to facilities capable of performing D8/17 staining within half a day of sample collection.

An immunological marker (D8/17) associated with rheumatic fever as a predictor of childhood psychiatric disorders in a community sample

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have documented that various behavioral disturbances accompany Sydenham's chorea, a neurologic variant of rheumatic fever. Further, an immunological marker associated with rheumatic fever (monoclonal antibody D8/17) has been reported to be elevated in several neuropsychiatric disorders, most frequently tics and obsessive-compulsive disorder. We examined this association in a community sample of children previously identified as being D8/17 positive or negative. It was hypothesized that D8/17 positivity would predict increased rates of tics and obsessive-compulsive disorder, even in the absence of Sydenham's chorea. Possible associations with other disorders accompanying Sydenham's chorea--hyperactivity, anxiety, and depression, also were explored.

METHOD

From 1991 to 1995, 2631 children (mean age = 9.6 +/- 1.6 years) from a low socioeconomic area of Mexico City were screened for the D8/17 marker. In a 2- to 5-year follow-up of 240 of these children (108 positive and 132 negative), structured psychiatric interviews and rating scales were administered to the child and main caretaker. Assessments were conducted and scored blind to the child's D8/17 status.

RESULTS

No association was seen between D8/17 positivity and tics or OCD.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to provide support for the generalized use of D8/17 as a marker of susceptibility to tics and OCD in a community sample.

Anti-inflammatory treatment for carditis in acute rheumatic fever

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic heart disease remains the most important cause of acquired heart disease in developing countries. Although the prevention of rheumatic fever and the management of recurrences is well established the optimal management of active rheumatic carditis is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of anti-inflammatory agents such as aspirin, corticosteroids and immunoglobulin for preventing or reducing further heart valve damage in patients with acute rheumatic fever.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Issue 4, 2000), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2002), EMBASE (1998 to November 2002), LILACS (1998 to November 2002), Index Medicus (1950 to December 2000) and references lists of identified studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing anti-inflammatory agents (e.g. aspirin, steroids, immunoglobulins) with placebo or controls, or comparing any of the anti-inflammatory agents with one another, in patients with acute rheumatic fever diagnosed according to the Jones, or modified Jones criteria. The presence of cardiac disease one year after treatment was the major outcome criteria selected.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight randomised controlled trials involving 996 people were included. Several steroidal agents viz. ACTH, cortisone, hydrocortisone, dexamethasone and prednisone, and intravenous immunoglobulin were compared to aspirin, placebo or no treatment in the various studies. Six of the trials were conducted between 1950 and 1965, whilst the remaining two were done in the last 10 years. Overall there was no significant difference in the risk of cardiac disease at one year between the corticosteroid-treated and aspirin-treated groups (relative risk 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 1.15). Similarly use of prednisone (relative risk 1.78, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 3.34) or intravenous immunoglobulins (relative risk 0.87, 95%confidence interval 0.55 to 1.39) when compared to placebo did not reduce the risk of developing heart valve lesions at one year.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is no benefit in using corticosteroids or intravenous immunoglobulins to reduce the risk of heart valve lesions in patients with acute rheumatic fever. The antiquity of most of the trials restricted adequate statistical analysis of the data and acceptable assessment of clinical outcomes by current standards. New randomised controlled trials in patients with acute rheumatic fever to assess the effects of corticosteroids such as oral prednisone and intravenous methylprednisone, and other new anti-inflammatory agents are warranted. Advances in echocardiography will allow for more objective and precise assessment of cardiac outcomes.

Distribution of cells bearing B-cell alloantigen(s) in North Indian rheumatic fever/rheumatic heart disease patients

Numerous investigators have developed monoclonal antibodies against B-cell alloantigen(s) of rheumatic fever. However, the developed monoclonals do not have the same significance in all the populations. We have developed a battery of monoclonals against B-cell alloantigens of North Indian rheumatic fever patients. In the present study, we have used these monoclonals to examine the frequency of rheumatic antigens in 30 patients with recurrence of rheumatic activity (RRA), 30 of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) patients and 50 controls using alkaline phosphatase anti-alkaline phosphatase (APAAP) technique. These patients were examined at the time of registry and after three months follow up. RRA patients showed higher percentage of lymphocyte positive as compare to RHD and controls. Interestingly, on follow-up RRA patients showed significant decline in positive lymphocyte as compare to first visit whereas no such change was observed in RHD patients. There were 90-93% of RRA and RHD patients positive with these monoclonals. A significant age variation of rheumatic cells was also noticed in all groups of rheumatic patients. We conclude that monoclonals raised from the same ethnic population are highly specific and cost effective to use them to develop an easy field test system such as APAAP, to identify the individual at risk, to develop rheumatic fever. It is also suggested that the alloantigen marker may persist through out life and gets activated after recurrence of the disease.

Further observations and characterization of monoclonal antibodies reacting with B cell alloantigens associated with rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease

Elevated levels of B lymphocytes with a unique surface alloantigen have been reported to be characteristic of patients with acute rheumatic fever or rheumatic heart disease. Mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to this alloantigen have been proposed as being useful in identifying individuals at risk for the development of these sequelae of group A streptococcal infection. However, previous studies have suggested that the discriminating ability of the mAbs was highest when the mAbs were made by using lymphocytes from the same ethnic population. To confirm and extend this observation, additional mouse mAbs were developed and their properties defined. These three mAbs-PG-12A, PG-13A, and PG-20A-reacted with B cells from more than 90% of North Indian patients with acute rheumatic fever or rheumatic heart disease. Each of these three new mAbs identified the highest levels of reactive B cells in patients with active acute rheumatic fever. Lower levels of positive reacting lymphocytes were found in individuals with quiescent chronic rheumatic heart disease, and markedly reduced percentages of reactive cells were observed in normal control subjects. The proportion of reactive lymphocytes in individual patients varied according to which of the three was tested, suggesting the possibility of a spectrum of "rheumatic" epitopes in susceptible individuals. The data further suggested that enhanced discriminatory ability for identifying "at-risk" susceptible patients could be obtained by testing with a combination of mAbs. If reduction in the incidence of acute rheumatic fever can be facilitated by early identification of susceptible individuals, accurate and sensitive detection of a marker antigen would result in more cost-effective public health measures. Additional population studies are required to more precisely define and confirm these detection techniques.

Ethnic differences in expression of susceptibility marker(s) in rheumatic fever/rheumatic heart disease patients

The ability of monoclonal antibodies (MAb) against a human B lymphocyte alloantigen has been suggested to discriminate between rheumatic fever "susceptible" individuals and persons with a lower risk of developing RF. However, while such MAb have been reported to identify a majority of RF/RHD patients in some populations, a reduced discriminatory ability has been observed in others. Antigenic variation in the RF marker(s) may exist among ethnic groups which reduce the discriminatory ability of these monoclonal antibodies. We developed MAb using B lymphocytes from RF patients of North Indian ethnic origin. In this same population we compared the new MAb (PGI/MN II) with a previously described MAb of Caucasian ethnic origin (D8/17). In three groups: acute rheumatic fever patients (no evidence of previous attacks of rheumatic fever), patients with chronic rheumatic heart disease and normal controls from the same population, we found a greater discriminating ability of PGI/MNII MAb to identify Indian RF/RHD patients than with the D8/17 MAb. Further, sixty percent of 142 siblings of the RF/RHD patients were "positive" when tested with PGI/MN II. The data from these studies suggest that before such MAb can be used for identification of RF "susceptibles" in public health programs, variation among ethnic populations must be assessed.