What is the current role of intracavernosal injection in management of erectile dysfunction?

Intra-cavernosal injection of botulinum toxin in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of botulinum toxin in treating erectile dysfunction as a novel treatment strategy avoiding morbid and irreversible surgeries.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was conducted from January 1990 through July 31, 2021. Search engines used included PubMed, Embase and Medline databases, to identify studies investigating botulinum toxin in erectile dysfunction, published in English. Seven studies in total were included in our review including two pre-clinical studies. A meta-analysis was performed on three outcomes included commonly in at least two studies. Among the different parameters assessed were, Erection Hardness Score (EHS), Peak Systolic Velocity in cavernosal artery (PSV) and the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score.

RESULTS

A clear benefit was noted for intracavernosal injection (ICI) of botulinum toxin (BoNT-A) on PSV with a mean difference (MD) of 10.82 [4.99, 16.65] and a heterogeneity of I2=61%. EHS results favored BoNT-A as well over placebo with a MD of 0.7 [0.47, 0.93] and a heterogeneity of I2=94%. As for SHIM score, with a heterogeneity of I2=85%, no statistically significant difference was found (MD 0.58 [-0.03, 1.20]).

CONCLUSION

Our review and meta-analysis have shown statistical significance for the benefit of BoNT-A in terms of EHS and PSV. However, this statistical significance should be interpreted in the light of the given limitations: small sample size, heterogeneity in data collection, patient selection bias, and clinical significance of the measured differences. ICI of BoNT-A should currently be limited to clinical studies to further elucidate its clinical benefit.

Complication Rates in Patients Using Intracavernosal Injection Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction With or Without Concurrent Anticoagulant Use-A Single-Center, Retrospective Pilot Study

Background

Intracavernosal injection therapy (ICI) is an effective intervention used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED). It has been proposed that caution should be exercised when prescribing ICI to patients currently taking anticoagulants (AC) due to the theoretical increased risk of bleeding, however, there is limited literature describing complication rates of actively anticoagulated patients utilizing ICI.

Aim

We sought to determine whether there was a difference in bleeding and other complications in a cohort of patients using ICI therapy with or without concurrent AC use.

Methods

We reviewed our institutional electronic health record and identified 168 patients who were seen in our clinic from January to August 2020 who had either currently or previously utilized ICI therapy for ED treatment. These patients were surveyed regarding their ICI therapy as well as given the erectile dysfunction inventory for treatment satisfaction questionnaire. Data from 85 patients was obtained; 43 concurrently using AC during ICI therapy and 42 with no AC use. Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and a 2-tailed t-test were used with P < .05 considered to be significant.

Outcome

Documented bleeding events (eg, bruising, hematoma), complications, and mean erectile dysfunction inventory for treatment satisfaction scores were compared between the 2 groups.

Results

There were more absolute bleeding complications in the AC group vs the no AC group, with 3 of 43 AC patients (7%, 95% confidence interval: 2.4–18.6) and 0/42 no AC patients (0%, 95% confidence interval: 0–8.4) experiencing some type of bleeding complication on ICI. However, there was no statistically significant difference found in overall or stratified documented bleeding events and complications between the 2 groups.

Clinical Implications

Patients with concurrent AC usage on ICI therapy reported a higher rate of absolute bleeding complications than our non-AC group.

Strengths and Limitations

The strength of this study is addressing question of safety of ICI therapy in patients with concurrent AC usage. Limitations include single-center retrospective study design and underpowered sample size limiting confidence with which conclusions from data should guide future patient counseling regarding ICI risks.

Conclusion

Findings from a single-center cohort of patients suggest that ICI therapy may be a safe and effective treatment modality for ED in patients with concurrent anticoagulant usage, however, given the higher rate of absolute bleeding events in our AC cohort, future assessment in a higher-powered study is warranted in determining a more accurate estimation of risk or propensity for bleeding complications in patients on AC using ICI therapy.

Blum KA, Mehr JP, Green T, et al. Complication Rates in Patients Using Intracavernosal Injection Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction With or Without Concurrent Anticoagulant Use—A Single-Center, Retrospective Pilot Study. Sex Med 2022;10:100535.

Effect of Intracavernosal Injection of Prostaglandin E1 on Duration and Rigidity of Erection in Patients With Vasculogenic Erectile Dysfunction: Is It Dose Dependent?

OBJECTIVE

To assess if the effect of intracavernosal injection of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) on duration and rigidity of erection is dose dependent in patients with different types of vasculogenic erectile dysfunction (ED)?

METHODS

A hundred patients with ED were assigned into 4 groups (n = 25/each); group (A) patients with arteriogenic ED, group (B) patients with veno-occlusive ED, group (C) patients with mixed (arteriogenic and veno-occlusive) ED, and group (D) patients who have only psychogenic ED (control). After intracavernosal injection of PGE1, patients were assessed using penile Doppler ultrasonography and erection hardness score together with calculation of erection duration. The starting dose of PGE1 was 5 μg which was increased to 10 µg and 20 µg as a maximal dose when needed.

RESULTS

The mean PSV of patients in groups A, B, C, and D were 24.38 ± 3.3, 37.74 ± 8.28, 22.24 ± 3.85, and 47.76 ± 6.27, respectively. In group D, 88% have achieved the best response at dose of 5 µg while 5.3%, 21.7%, and 0% have achieved the best response at dose of 5 µg in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P < .05 for each). The rest of patients have required either 10 or 20µg to achieve the best response. Patients in group C have required the highest dose of PGE1 to achieve the best response (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Intracavernosal injection of PGE1 in escalating doses have improved the rigidity and duration of erection in patients with different types of vasculogenic ED. Patients with mixed arteriogenic and veno-occlusive ED have required the highest dose of PGE1 to achieve the best response.

Utility of dynamic MRA in the evaluation of male erectile dysfunction

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) in evaluating penile vasculature in patients with clinically suspected vascular anomalies contributing to their erectile dysfunction correlating with penile doppler ultrasound (PDUS) findings and clinical outcomes after surgical intervention.

METHODS

Men (n = 26) with signs of early vascular shunting on PDUS underwent time-resolved, contrast-enhanced (0.1 mMol/kg gadobutrol at 1 ml/s followed by saline flush) 3-dimensional spoiled gradient echo T1-weighted MRA sequence performed over 3 min with 4.6 s frame rate after intracavernosal injection of an erectogenic agent. Additional T1- and T2-weighted sequences were performed for anatomic co-localization and tissue characterization. MRA images were evaluated for early filling of draining veins as well as arteriovenous malformations and fistulas and correlated with findings at surgery.

RESULTS

29 MRA examinations on 26 patients (mean age 39 years) demonstrated abnormal early venous drainage (n = 22) as well as diminutive/delayed cavernosal enhancement (n = 3), incomplete tumescence (n = 2), and combined arterial inflow/venous outflow disease (n = 1). The MRA had a concordance of 85.2% at determining the presence, or lack thereof of a shunt/AVM when compared to PDUS.

CONCLUSIONS

Time-resolved MRA allows for both temporal and spatial resolution with visualization of both arterial and venous abnormalities which may be suggested with a screening PDUS examination. This technique allows us to provide detailed anatomic information prior to any surgical intervention.

A Review of Current and Emerging Therapeutic Options for Erectile Dysfunction

Contemporary treatment algorithms for erectile dysfunction (ED) involve the use of medical therapies such as phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors and intracavernosal injection therapy of vasoactive agents, as well as vacuum erection devices and penile prosthesis implants in medically refractory cases. However, the current therapeutic options only address the symptoms of ED and not the underlying pathogenesis that results in ED. Newer and novel ED therapies aspire to reverse ED conditions by preventing cavernosal fibrosis, promoting endothelial revascularization and modulating various neuro-hormonal pathways. Regenerative therapeutic strategies such as low-intensity shock wave, gene and cellular-based therapies, and penile transplants are designed to improve penile hemodynamics and revitalize the cavernosal smooth muscle to mitigate and/or reverse underlying ED. This state-of-art article evaluates current and emerging therapeutic options for ED.

Pharmacotherapy for erectile dysfunction in diabetic males

INTRODUCTION

Numerous studies have highlighted the intimate association between erectile dysfunction (ED) and diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the true pathogenesis of ED among diabetic men has not yet been fully discovered. The treatment of ED in diabetic patients remains an interesting area of research. The last two decades have witnessed phenomenal advances in the management of ED with the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for ED in diabetic patients encouraging, especially with introduction of innovative conservative tools for treatment.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to discuss the currently available information on ED pharmacotherapy in diabetic males and provide an expert perspective on the current treatment strategies.

EXPERT OPINION

Conservative treatment remains the initial step for the treatment of ED in diabetic patients. This kind of therapy consists of different modalities including: oral treatments, intracavernosal pharmacotherapy, and evolving modalities such as soluble guanylate cyclase activators, stem cells (SCs), and alternative treatments such as herbal treatment and transdermal/topical pharmacotherapy. However, it should be noted that the currently available pharmacotherapy is still far from ideal. One hopes to witness new drugs and technologies that may revolutionize ED treatment in the future, especially in such complex cases as DM.

Topical alprostadil (Vitaros©) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction after non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the treatment with topical alprostadil (Vitaros^©) in post-robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) rehabilitation therapy of patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

Seventy-four patients were enrolled and underwent non-nerve-sparing RARP.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age <75, preoperatively International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) >16, erection hardness score (EHS) ⩾2, weekly sexual intercourse ⩾1, affirmative answers to Sexual Encounter Profile Question (SEP-Q) 2 and SEP-Q3, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ⩽5, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ⩽1, no moderate/severe cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

Vitaros was administered ⩾2 twice a week. At month 6, the IIEF-5 decreased from 20.5 preoperative to 18.1 post-treatment. EHS score decreased from a mean of 3.3 to a mean of 3.0. The quality of life score decreased from an average of 5.1 to 2.3. Weekly sexual intercourse decreased from an average of 2.1 to 1.7. Six patients dropped out; 89.7% patients showed a positive SEP-Q2 and 77.8% a positive SEP-Q3. All patients responded positively to Global Assessment Questions (GAQ)-1 and 97% to GAQ-2. Of all 68 analyzed patients, 13 (17.6%) switched to intracavernous injection therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, Vitaros may become a viable alternative to common injective therapies in well-selected patients after RARP.