Increased carotid artery intima-media thickness following venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the neonatal period

Successful primary use of VVDL+V ECMO with cephalic drain in neonatal respiratory failure

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of double-lumen venovenous (VVDL) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) with cephalic draining cannula (VVDL+V) as a primary approach for all neonatal respiratory diagnoses and to compare our single-center experience with data as collected in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) database.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of ECMO for neonatal respiratory failure performed in the neonatal intensive-care unit at a large referral children's hospital, the Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston (CHOA-E). Comparisons were then made to neonatal respiratory ECMO data retrieved from the ELSO database.

RESULTS

At CHOA-E 162 of 189 cases were completed with the VVDL+V approach. Survival in the VVDL+V cohort was 89.1% versus 68.7% from ELSO, P<0.001. For those complications considered, the overall risk of complication favored the CHOA-E VVDL+V group as compared with ELSO (odds ratio (OR) 0.71 (0.52-0.7)) as did the risk of neurologic complications (OR 0.29, (0.15-0.58)), including intracranial hemorrhage (OR 0.39 (0.18-0.97), P=0.011).

CONCLUSION

The VVDL+V approach can be used successfully as the primary approach for ECMO for neonatal respiratory failure of various etiologies and in this single-center cohort this approach was associated with improved survival and lower rates of complication as compared with the ELSO database.

Outcome analysis of neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia treated with venovenous vs venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

PURPOSE

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (VA) is used more commonly in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) than venovenous ECMO (VV). We hypothesized that VV may result in comparable outcomes in infants with CDH requiring ECMO.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) database (1991-2006). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to compare VV- and VA-associated mortality.

RESULTS

Four thousand one hundred fifteen neonates required ECMO, with an overall mortality rate of 49.6%. Venoarterial ECMO was used in 82% and VV in 18% of neonates. Pre-ECMO inotrope use and complications were equivalent between VA and VV. The mortality rate for VA and VV was 50% and 46%, respectively. After adjusting for birth weight, gestational age, prenatal diagnosis, ethnicity, Apgar scores, pH less than 7.20, Paco(2) greater than 50, requiring high-frequency ventilation, and year of ECMO, there was no difference in mortality between VV vs VA. Renal complications and on-ECMO inotrope use were more common with VV, whereas neurologic complications were more common with VA. The conversion rate from VV to VA was 18%; conversion was associated with a 56% mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcomes of VV and VA are comparable. Patients with CDH who fail VV may be predisposed to a worse outcome. Nevertheless, VV offers equal benefit to patients with CDH requiring ECMO while preserving the native carotid.