1
|
Mendu SB, Neela AR, Tammali S, Kotha R. Impact of Early Bonding During the Maternal Sensitive Period on Long-Term Effects: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e53318. [PMID: 38435959 PMCID: PMC10905202 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
This research project examines the long-term effects of maternal-neonatal bonding during a mother's "sensitive period." The review explores how early contact between a mother and her newborn can affect their psychosocial and emotional well-being in the future. Within an hour after birth, oxytocin levels increase for mothers, while catecholamine surges enhance neonates' memory retention to encourage immediate skin-to-skin contact (SSC), which promotes breastfeeding with benefits, such as quicker placenta expulsion, less bleeding, and lower stress. As per sources to date, there is no systematic review on this subject; however, numerous studies exist regarding short-term outcomes, exclusive breastfeeding, and childhood problems. The exploration involves rigorous searches of academic databases following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for transparency and reproducibility by using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) framework. Of the 516 initially identified articles, only five were relevant based on refined selection criteria, making it clear from the analysis that sensitive-period bonding produces long-term impacts in infants. Few studies are available, particularly in recent years; thus, more research is required in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aruna Rekha Neela
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Siddipet, Siddipet, IND
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pang Y, Wang X, Li H, Tu S. Effect of neonatal breast crawl on breastfeeding: a prospective cohort study. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1186585. [PMID: 37360359 PMCID: PMC10285413 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1186585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim To analyse the effect of breast crawl on neonatal breastfeeding within 5 months of delivery. Design Prospective Cohort Study. Methods Neonates were divided into successful and failed groups, according to whether the newborn crawled to the breast and began sucking for the first time within 1 h after delivery. The initiation of lactation and breastfeeding duration of the two groups were analysed at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, the feeding practices were followed-up on the 7th day, 42nd day, and 5th month in order to explore the long-term benefits of breast crawl on breastfeeding. Results A total of 163 neonates were included. The initiation time and the duration of first feeding, the lactation initiation in the successful group was earlier, the scores of first and in-hospital breastfeeding scales were higher. Public Contribution Breast crawl is the preferred method for mothers to begin breastfeeding. The delivery room is the place where the first breast crawl occurs immediately after delivery. The midwife is the key person to protect this valuable behavior. Therefore, the midwife needs provide valuable opportunities for the breast crawl of the newborn and promote this behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Pang
- Department of Nursing, Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Nursing, Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Huimin Li
- Department of Nursing, Chengdu Women and Children's Central Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Suhua Tu
- Department of Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gavine A, Shinwell SC, Buchanan P, Farre A, Wade A, Lynn F, Marshall J, Cumming SE, Dare S, McFadden A. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 10:CD001141. [PMID: 36282618 PMCID: PMC9595242 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001141.pub6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is extensive evidence of important health risks for infants and mothers related to not breastfeeding. In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended that infants be breastfed exclusively until six months of age, with breastfeeding continuing as an important part of the infant's diet until at least two years of age. However, current breastfeeding rates in many countries do not reflect this recommendation. OBJECTIVES 1. To describe types of breastfeeding support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. 2. To examine the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding support interventions in terms of whether they offered only breastfeeding support or breastfeeding support in combination with a wider maternal and child health intervention ('breastfeeding plus' support). 3. To examine the effectiveness of the following intervention characteristics on breastfeeding support: a. type of support (e.g. face-to-face, telephone, digital technologies, group or individual support, proactive or reactive); b. intensity of support (i.e. number of postnatal contacts); c. person delivering the intervention (e.g. healthcare professional, lay person); d. to examine whether the impact of support varied between high- and low-and middle-income countries. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (which includes results of searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP)) (11 May 2021) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing extra support for healthy breastfeeding mothers of healthy term babies with usual maternity care. Support could be provided face-to-face, over the phone or via digital technologies. All studies had to meet the trustworthiness criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth methods. Two review authors independently selected trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and study trustworthiness. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS This updated review includes 116 trials of which 103 contribute data to the analyses. In total more than 98,816 mother-infant pairs were included. Moderate-certainty evidence indicated that 'breastfeeding only' support probably reduced the number of women stopping breastfeeding for all primary outcomes: stopping any breastfeeding at six months (Risk Ratio (RR) 0.93, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.89 to 0.97); stopping exclusive breastfeeding at six months (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.93); stopping any breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.97); and stopping exclusive breastfeeding at 4-6 (RR 0.83 95% CI 0.76 to 0.90). Similar findings were reported for the secondary breastfeeding outcomes except for any breastfeeding at two months and 12 months when the evidence was uncertain if 'breastfeeding only' support helped reduce the number of women stopping breastfeeding. The evidence for 'breastfeeding plus' was less consistent. For primary outcomes there was some evidence that 'breastfeeding plus' support probably reduced the number of women stopping any breastfeeding (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.97, moderate-certainty evidence) or exclusive breastfeeding at six months (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.90). 'Breastfeeding plus' interventions may have a beneficial effect on reducing the number of women stopping exclusive breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95). The evidence suggests that 'breastfeeding plus' support probably results in little to no difference in the number of women stopping any breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.08, moderate-certainty evidence). For the secondary outcomes, it was uncertain if 'breastfeeding plus' support helped reduce the number of women stopping any or exclusive breastfeeding at any time points. There were no consistent findings emerging from the narrative synthesis of the non-breastfeeding outcomes (maternal satisfaction with care, maternal satisfaction with feeding method, infant morbidity, and maternal mental health), except for a possible reduction of diarrhoea in intervention infants. We considered the overall risk of bias of trials included in the review was mixed. Blinding of participants and personnel is not feasible in such interventions and as studies utilised self-report breastfeeding data, there is also a risk of bias in outcome assessment. We conducted meta-regression to explore substantial heterogeneity for the primary outcomes using the following categories: person providing care; mode of delivery; intensity of support; and income status of country. It is possible that moderate levels (defined as 4-8 visits) of 'breastfeeding only' support may be associated with a more beneficial effect on exclusive breastfeeding at 4-6 weeks and six months. 'Breastfeeding only' support may also be more effective in reducing women in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) stopping exclusive breastfeeding at six months compared to women in high-income countries (HICs). However, no other differential effects were found and thus heterogeneity remains largely unexplained. The meta-regression suggested that there were no differential effects regarding person providing support or mode of delivery, however, power was limited. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: When 'breastfeeding only' support is offered to women, the duration and in particular, the exclusivity of breastfeeding is likely to be increased. Support may also be more effective in reducing the number of women stopping breastfeeding at three to four months compared to later time points. For 'breastfeeding plus' interventions the evidence is less certain. Support may be offered either by professional or lay/peer supporters, or a combination of both. Support can also be offered face-to-face, via telephone or digital technologies, or a combination and may be more effective when delivered on a schedule of four to eight visits. Further work is needed to identify components of the effective interventions and to deliver interventions on a larger scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Gavine
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Shona C Shinwell
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | | | - Albert Farre
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Angela Wade
- Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Fiona Lynn
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Joyce Marshall
- Division of Maternal Health, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Sara E Cumming
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Shadrach Dare
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Alison McFadden
- Mother and Infant Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mary JJF, Sindhuri R, Kumaran AA, Dongre AR. Early initiation of breastfeeding and factors associated with its delay among mothers at discharge from a single hospital. Clin Exp Pediatr 2022; 65:201-208. [PMID: 34665960 PMCID: PMC8990951 DOI: 10.3345/cep.2021.00129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to the National Family Health Survey- 4, in India, 78.9% of deliveries occur in institutions, although only 42.6% of new mothers initiate breastfeeding within 1 hour of delivery. PURPOSE To estimate the proportion of early initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) among new mothers at discharge from a tertiary care hospital and identify the determinants of delayed initiation of breastfeeding among them. METHODS This was a hospital-based analytical cross-sectional study of 108 new mothers. After obtaining Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent, we interviewed the new mothers on the day of discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 24. RESULTS The median breastfeeding initiation time was 90 minutes (interquartile range, 30-180 minutes). Overall, 43.5% of the mothers practiced EIBF, 77.4% practiced exclusive breastfeeding, and 43.5% were rooming in at discharge. Reasons for breastfeeding delays included extended recovery time from spinal anesthesia, maternal lassitude, and uncomfortable breastfeeding position due to post-cesarean pain. In the multivariate analysis, a birth weight less than 2,500 g (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-16.82; P=0.03), cesarean section delivery (aOR, 4.68; 95% CI, 1.57- 13.92; P=0.005), and mother's poor knowledge of breastfeeding (aOR, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.44-14.72; P=0.010) were more likely to delay the initiation of breastfeeding. CONCLUSION EIBF was practiced by less than half of the new mothers as determined by the cesarean section, baby's birth weight, and mothers' awareness of breastfeeding. Thus, it is vital to improve breastfeeding and nutritional counseling among mothers during the antenatal period and improve healthcare professionals' training to facilitate EIBF, even in circumstances such as cesarean section.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jenifer Florence Mary
- Department of Community Medicine, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India
| | - R Sindhuri
- Department of Community Medicine, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India
| | - A Arul Kumaran
- Department of Pediatrics, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India
| | - Amol R Dongre
- Department of Extension Programmes, Pramukhswami Medical College, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, Gujarat, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yin C, Su X, Liang Q, Ngai FW. Effect of Baby-Led Self-Attachment Breastfeeding Technique in the Postpartum Period on Breastfeeding Rates: A Randomized Study. Breastfeed Med 2021; 16:734-740. [PMID: 33913745 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effects of a baby-led self-attachment breastfeeding support intervention on the prevalence and duration of exclusive breastfeeding and nipple pain at 3 days, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postpartum among Chinese mothers. Materials and Methods: A randomized study was conducted with 504 mother-infant dyads allocated to the baby-led self-attachment breastfeeding support intervention (n = 251) and standard postpartum care (n = 253). Data on the prevalence and duration of exclusive breastfeeding and nipple pain were collected at 3 days, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postpartum. Results: Mothers in the intervention group were significantly more likely exclusively breastfeeding at 3 days (mean difference = 12.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-20.2%, p = 0.004) and 6 months postpartum (mean difference = 17.8%, 95% CI: 8.3-27.4%, p < 0.001). They were less likely to stop breastfeeding over the 6-month period, compared with the control group (Hazard ratio = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.49-0.87). They were also less likely to experience nipple pain at 3 days (mean difference = -8.1%, 95% CI: -15.9 to -0.4%, p = 0.04) and 3 months postpartum (mean difference = -4.9%, 95% CI: -8.7 to -1.2%, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The baby-led self-attachment breastfeeding support is clinically effective in increasing the prevalence and duration of exclusive breastfeeding and reducing nipple pain among Chinese mothers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caixin Yin
- Nursing Department, Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xi Su
- School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiuxia Liang
- Delivery Department, Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fei Wan Ngai
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
McFadden A, Gavine A, Renfrew MJ, Wade A, Buchanan P, Taylor JL, Veitch E, Rennie AM, Crowther SA, Neiman S, MacGillivray S. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2:CD001141. [PMID: 28244064 PMCID: PMC6464485 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001141.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 233] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is extensive evidence of important health risks for infants and mothers related to not breastfeeding. In 2003, the World Health Organization recommended that infants be breastfed exclusively until six months of age, with breastfeeding continuing as an important part of the infant's diet until at least two years of age. However, current breastfeeding rates in many countries do not reflect this recommendation. OBJECTIVES To describe forms of breastfeeding support which have been evaluated in controlled studies, the timing of the interventions and the settings in which they have been used.To examine the effectiveness of different modes of offering similar supportive interventions (for example, whether the support offered was proactive or reactive, face-to-face or over the telephone), and whether interventions containing both antenatal and postnatal elements were more effective than those taking place in the postnatal period alone.To examine the effectiveness of different care providers and (where information was available) training.To explore the interaction between background breastfeeding rates and effectiveness of support. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing extra support for healthy breastfeeding mothers of healthy term babies with usual maternity care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS This updated review includes 100 trials involving more than 83,246 mother-infant pairs of which 73 studies contribute data (58 individually-randomised trials and 15 cluster-randomised trials). We considered that the overall risk of bias of trials included in the review was mixed. Of the 31 new studies included in this update, 21 provided data for one or more of the primary outcomes. The total number of mother-infant pairs in the 73 studies that contributed data to this review is 74,656 (this total was 56,451 in the previous version of this review). The 73 studies were conducted in 29 countries. Results of the analyses continue to confirm that all forms of extra support analyzed together showed a decrease in cessation of 'any breastfeeding', which includes partial and exclusive breastfeeding (average risk ratio (RR) for stopping any breastfeeding before six months 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88 to 0.95; moderate-quality evidence, 51 studies) and for stopping breastfeeding before four to six weeks (average RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95; moderate-quality evidence, 33 studies). All forms of extra support together also showed a decrease in cessation of exclusive breastfeeding at six months (average RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.92; moderate-quality evidence, 46 studies) and at four to six weeks (average RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.89; moderate quality, 32 studies). We downgraded evidence to moderate-quality due to very high heterogeneity.We investigated substantial heterogeneity for all four outcomes with subgroup analyses for the following covariates: who delivered care, type of support, timing of support, background breastfeeding rate and number of postnatal contacts. Covariates were not able to explain heterogeneity in general. Though the interaction tests were significant for some analyses, we advise caution in the interpretation of results for subgroups due to the heterogeneity. Extra support by both lay and professionals had a positive impact on breastfeeding outcomes. Several factors may have also improved results for women practising exclusive breastfeeding, such as interventions delivered with a face-to-face component, high background initiation rates of breastfeeding, lay support, and a specific schedule of four to eight contacts. However, because within-group heterogeneity remained high for all of these analyses, we advise caution when making specific conclusions based on subgroup results. We noted no evidence for subgroup differences for the any breastfeeding outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS When breastfeeding support is offered to women, the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding is increased. Characteristics of effective support include: that it is offered as standard by trained personnel during antenatal or postnatal care, that it includes ongoing scheduled visits so that women can predict when support will be available, and that it is tailored to the setting and the needs of the population group. Support is likely to be more effective in settings with high initiation rates. Support may be offered either by professional or lay/peer supporters, or a combination of both. Strategies that rely mainly on face-to-face support are more likely to succeed with women practising exclusive breastfeeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison McFadden
- University of DundeeMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research11 Airlie PlaceDundeeTaysideUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Anna Gavine
- University of Dundeeevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research11 Airlie PlaceDundeeUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Mary J Renfrew
- University of DundeeMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research11 Airlie PlaceDundeeTaysideUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Angela Wade
- Institute of Child HealthCentre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics30 Guilford StLondonUKWC1N 1 EH
| | | | | | - Emma Veitch
- Breastfeeding NetworkPaisleyRenfrewshireUKPA2 8YB
| | - Anne Marie Rennie
- NHS Grampian, Aberdeen Maternity HospitalCornhill RoadAberdeenUKAB25 2ZL
| | - Susan A Crowther
- Robert Gordon UniversityFaculty of Health and Social Care, School of Nursing and MidwiferyGarthdee RoadAberdeenUKAB10 7AQ
| | - Sara Neiman
- Breastfeeding NetworkPaisleyRenfrewshireUKPA2 8YB
| | - Stephen MacGillivray
- University of Dundeeevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR), School of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dundee Centre for Health and Related Research11 Airlie PlaceDundeeUKDD1 4HJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moore ER, Bergman N, Anderson GC, Medley N. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11:CD003519. [PMID: 27885658 PMCID: PMC6464366 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003519.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mother-infant separation post birth is common. In standard hospital care, newborn infants are held wrapped or dressed in their mother's arms, placed in open cribs or under radiant warmers. Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) begins ideally at birth and should last continually until the end of the first breastfeeding. SSC involves placing the dried, naked baby prone on the mother's bare chest, often covered with a warm blanket. According to mammalian neuroscience, the intimate contact inherent in this place (habitat) evokes neuro-behaviors ensuring fulfillment of basic biological needs. This time frame immediately post birth may represent a 'sensitive period' for programming future physiology and behavior. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of immediate or early SSC for healthy newborn infants compared to standard contact on establishment and maintenance of breastfeeding and infant physiology. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (17 December 2015), made personal contact with trialists, consulted the bibliography on kangaroo mother care (KMC) maintained by Dr Susan Ludington, and reviewed reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials that compared immediate or early SSC with usual hospital care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. Quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 46 trials with 3850 women and their infants; 38 trials with 3472 women and infants contributed data to our analyses. Trials took place in 21 countries, and most recruited small samples (just 12 trials randomized more than 100 women). Eight trials included women who had SSC after cesarean birth. All infants recruited to trials were healthy, and the majority were full term. Six trials studied late preterm infants (greater than 35 weeks' gestation). No included trial met all criteria for good quality with respect to methodology and reporting; no trial was successfully blinded, and all analyses were imprecise due to small sample size. Many analyses had statistical heterogeneity due to considerable differences between SSC and standard care control groups. Results for womenSSC women were more likely than women with standard contact to be breastfeeding at one to four months post birth, though there was some uncertainty in this estimate due to risks of bias in included trials (average risk ratio (RR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.43; participants = 887; studies = 14; I² = 41%; GRADE: moderate quality). SSC women also breast fed their infants longer, though data were limited (mean difference (MD) 64 days, 95% CI 37.96 to 89.50; participants = 264; studies = six; GRADE:low quality); this result was from a sensitivity analysis excluding one trial contributing all of the heterogeneity in the primary analysis. SSC women were probably more likely to exclusively breast feed from hospital discharge to one month post birth and from six weeks to six months post birth, though both analyses had substantial heterogeneity (from discharge average RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.49; participants = 711; studies = six; I² = 44%; GRADE: moderate quality; from six weeks average RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.90; participants = 640; studies = seven; I² = 62%; GRADE: moderate quality).Women in the SCC group had higher mean scores for breastfeeding effectiveness, with moderate heterogeneity (IBFAT (Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool) score MD 2.28, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.15; participants = 384; studies = four; I² = 41%). SSC infants were more likely to breast feed successfully during their first feed, with high heterogeneity (average RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.67; participants = 575; studies = five; I² = 85%). Results for infantsSSC infants had higher SCRIP (stability of the cardio-respiratory system) scores overall, suggesting better stabilization on three physiological parameters. However, there were few infants, and the clinical significance of the test was unclear because trialists reported averages of multiple time points (standardized mean difference (SMD) 1.24, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.72; participants = 81; studies = two; GRADE low quality). SSC infants had higher blood glucose levels (MD 10.49, 95% CI 8.39 to 12.59; participants = 144; studies = three; GRADE: low quality), but similar temperature to infants in standard care (MD 0.30 degree Celcius (°C) 95% CI 0.13 °C to 0.47 °C; participants = 558; studies = six; I² = 88%; GRADE: low quality). Women and infants after cesarean birthWomen practicing SSC after cesarean birth were probably more likely to breast feed one to four months post birth and to breast feed successfully (IBFAT score), but analyses were based on just two trials and few women. Evidence was insufficient to determine whether SSC could improve breastfeeding at other times after cesarean. Single trials contributed to infant respiratory rate, maternal pain and maternal state anxiety with no power to detect group differences. SubgroupsWe found no differences for any outcome when we compared times of initiation (immediate less than 10 minutes post birth versus early 10 minutes or more post birth) or lengths of contact time (60 minutes or less contact versus more than 60 minutes contact). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Evidence supports the use of SSC to promote breastfeeding. Studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm physiological benefit for infants during transition to extra-uterine life and to establish possible dose-response effects and optimal initiation time. Methodological quality of trials remains problematic, and small trials reporting different outcomes with different scales and limited data limit our confidence in the benefits of SSC for infants. Our review included only healthy infants, which limits the range of physiological parameters observed and makes their interpretation difficult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R Moore
- Vanderbilt UniversitySchool of Nursing314 Godchaux Hall21st Avenue SouthNashvilleTennesseeUSA37240‐0008
| | - Nils Bergman
- University of Cape TownSchool of Child and Adolescent Health, and Department of Human BiologyCape TownSouth Africa
| | - Gene C Anderson
- Professor Emerita, University of FloridaCase Western Reserve UniversityOak Hammock at the University of Florida5000 SW 25th Boulevard #2108GainesvilleFLUSA32608‐8901
| | - Nancy Medley
- The University of LiverpoolCochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women's and Children's HealthFirst Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation TrustCrown StreetLiverpoolUKL8 7SS
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Balogun OO, O'Sullivan EJ, McFadden A, Ota E, Gavine A, Garner CD, Renfrew MJ, MacGillivray S. Interventions for promoting the initiation of breastfeeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11:CD001688. [PMID: 27827515 PMCID: PMC6464788 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001688.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the widely documented risks of not breastfeeding, initiation rates remain relatively low in many high-income countries, particularly among women in lower-income groups. In low- and middle-income countries, many women do not follow World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations to initiate breastfeeding within the first hour after birth. This is an update of a Cochrane Review, first published in 2005. OBJECTIVES To identify and describe health promotion activities intended to increase the initiation rate of breastfeeding.To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding.To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of breastfeeding promotion activities, in terms of changing the number of women who initiate breastfeeding early (within one hour after birth). SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register (29 February 2016) and scanned reference lists of all articles obtained. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with or without blinding, of any breastfeeding promotion intervention in any population group, except women and infants with a specific health problem. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial reports for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion and a third review author was involved when necessary. We contacted investigators to obtain missing information. MAIN RESULTS Twenty-eight trials involving 107,362 women in seven countries are included in this updated review. Five studies involving 3,124 women did not contribute outcome data and we excluded them from the analyses. The methodological quality of the included trials was mixed, with significant numbers of studies at high or unclear risk of bias due to: inadequate allocation concealment (N = 20); lack of blinding of outcome assessment (N = 20); incomplete outcome data (N = 19); selective reporting (N = 22) and bias from other potential sources (N = 17). Healthcare professional-led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care The studies pooled here compare professional health workers delivering breastfeeding education and support during the prenatal and postpartum periods with standard care. Interventions included promotion campaigns and counselling, and all took place in a formal setting. There was evidence from five trials involving 564 women for improved rates ofbreastfeeding initiation among women who received healthcare professional-led breastfeeding education and support (average risk ratio (RR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.92; Tau² = 0.07, I² = 62%, low-quality evidence) compared to those women who received standard care. We downgraded evidence due to design limitations and heterogeneity. The outcome of early initiation of breastfeeding was not reported in the studies under this comparison. Non-healthcare professional-led breastfeeding education and support versus standard care There was evidence from eight trials of 5712 women for improved rates of breastfeeding initiation among women who received interventions from non-healthcare professional counsellors and support groups (average RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.40; Tau² = 0.02, I² = 86%, low-quality evidence) compared to women who received standard care. In three trials of 76,373 women, there was no clear difference between groups in terms of the number of women practicing early initiation of breastfeeding (average RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.95; Tau² = 0.18, I² = 78%, very low-quality evidence). We downgraded the evidence for a combination of design limitations, heterogeneity and imprecision (wide confidence intervals crossing the line of no effect). Other comparisonsOther comparisons in this review also looked at the rates of initiation of breastfeeding and there were no clear differences between groups for the following comparisons of combined healthcare professional-led education with peer support or community educator versus standard care (2 studies, 1371 women) or attention control (1 study, 237 women), breastfeeding education using multimedia (a self-help manual or a video) versus routine care (2 studies, 497 women); early mother-infant contact versus standard care (2 studies, 309 women); and community-based breastfeeding groups versus no breastfeeding groups (1 study, 18,603 women). None of these comparisons reported data on early initiation of breastfeeding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review found low-quality evidence that healthcare professional-led breastfeeding education and non-healthcare professional-led counselling and peer support interventions can result in some improvements in the number of women beginning to breastfeed. The majority of the trials were conducted in the USA, among women on low incomes and who varied in ethnicity and feeding intention, thus limiting the generalisability of these results to other settings.Future studies would ideally be conducted in a range of low- and high-income settings, with data on breastfeeding rates over various timeframes, and explore the effectiveness of interventions that are initiated prior to conception or during pregnancy. These might include well-described interventions, including health education, early and continuing mother-infant contact, and initiatives to help mothers overcome societal barriers to breastfeeding, all with clearly defined outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olukunmi O Balogun
- National Center for Child Health and DevelopmentDepartment of Health Policy2‐10‐1 Okura, SetagayaTokyoTokyoJapan157‐8535
| | | | - Alison McFadden
- University of DundeeMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences11 Airlie PlaceDundeeTaysideUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Erika Ota
- St. Luke's International University, Graduate School of Nursing SciencesGlobal Health Nursing10‐1 Akashi‐choChuo‐KuTokyoJapan104‐0044
| | - Anna Gavine
- University of Dundeeevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR)11 Airlie PlaceDundeeUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Christine D Garner
- Cornell UniversityDivision of Nutritional Sciences244 Garden AvenueIthacaNYUSA14853
| | - Mary J Renfrew
- University of DundeeMother and Infant Research Unit, School of Nursing and Health Sciences11 Airlie PlaceDundeeTaysideUKDD1 4HJ
| | - Stephen MacGillivray
- University of Dundeeevidence Synthesis Training and Research Group (eSTAR)11 Airlie PlaceDundeeUKDD1 4HJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Heidarzadeh M, Hakimi S, Habibelahi A, Mohammadi M, Shahrak SP. Comparison of Breast Crawl Between Infants Delivered by Vaginal Delivery and Cesarean Section. Breastfeed Med 2016; 11:305-308. [PMID: 27171469 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2015.0168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Exclusive breastfeeding is the single most cost-effective intervention to reduce infant mortality. Breast crawl (BC) is deemed a natural way for the baby to behave immediately after delivery. BC is the method that may help initiation of breastfeeding in the most natural way. The aim of this study is to compare successful BC between neonates born through vaginal delivery and those born through cesarean section (CS) and factors associated with a positive outcome. METHODS Participants were mothers who delivered their babies during the period of October 2012 to December 2013 in Alzahra Hospital in Tabriz, through cesarean or vaginal delivery. Infants were placed prone on their mothers' abdomen after delivery. RESULTS Data show that babies delivered through vaginal delivery had significantly more success in BC than babies born through the cesarean delivery (88.01% versus 11.21%). Moreover, babies in the CS group used significantly less time to achieve BC (45 versus 28 minutes). CONCLUSION There is a remarkable difference in completion and length of time used to achieve BC between infants with regard to the delivery mode. Encouraging BC in all dyads, especially in cesarean births, may unduly delay the infant's first breastfeed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Heidarzadeh
- 1 Department of Pediatrics and Neonates, School of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Science , Tabriz, Iran
| | - Sevil Hakimi
- 2 Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Science , Tabriz, Iran
| | - Abbas Habibelahi
- 3 Department of Neonatal Health, Ministry of Health and Medical Education , Tehran, Iran
| | - Marzieh Mohammadi
- 2 Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Science , Tabriz, Iran
| | - Shakiba Pourasad Shahrak
- 2 Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Science , Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schafer R, Genna CW. Physiologic Breastfeeding: A Contemporary Approach to Breastfeeding Initiation. J Midwifery Womens Health 2015; 60:546-53. [DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|