Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: frequency of complications in premature newborn depends on the insertion site

Central Lines and Their Complications in Neonates: A Case Report and Literature Review

Central lines are essential devices in NICUs, used primarily in preterm neonates and critically ill term neonates. They are typically divided into non-tunnelled, tunnelled and totally implanted. In light of the increasing use of central lines in the NICU setting, monitoring of the risk factors associated with complications has to be an important part of neonatal care quality management. Presented here is a case of a preterm neonate with cardiac tamponade caused by UVC tip migration. Among complications of central lines are CLABSI, with an incidence of 3 to 21 per 1000 catheter days, and portal vein thrombosis, which is common but probably under-recognised, whereas other mechanical complications such as pericardial and pleural effusions are rare, with an incidence of less than 1%. Complications can cause injury to the neonates, as well as increase the costs of health services because of increases in the length of stay in the NICU. It is recommended that the catheter tip location is confirmed either by X-ray or ultrasonography. In order to minimise the risk of CLABSI, the use of bundles is recommended. Certain recommendations need to be followed when using different types of catheters. Future research is aimed at novel ways of central line securement to minimise mechanical complications and the use of antimicrobial catheters to reduce the rate of CLABSI.

Role of a radiopaque agent and surveillance radiographs for peripherally inserted central catheters in newborn infants

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the use of a radiopaque agent to identify peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tip positions in newborn infants and of serial radiography to monitor PICC tip migration.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the roles of (1) the injection of a radiopaque agent to identify PICC tip position and (2) the performance of weekly radiography to monitor PICC migration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective single-centre cohort study included newborn infants who received a PICC between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020. A radiopaque agent was injected to identify PICC tip position and radiographs were performed weekly to detect PICC migration.

RESULTS

We identified 676 PICC episodes in 601 infants. A radiopaque agent was used for 590 of these episodes. There was no difference in the proportion of central PICC tip positions based on radiopaque agent use status (490/590, 83% for the radiopaque agent used group versus 73/85, 85.8% for the radiopaque agent not used group, P=0.51). Irrespective of the site of PICC insertion, outward migration was observed for most centrally placed PICCs over their entire in situ duration. Inward migration was identified in 23 out of 643 PICC episodes (3.6%) only on radiographs obtained on or before day 7. Based on serial radiographs, the odds for PICC tips remaining in a central position were lower the longer the PICC remained in situ (adjusted odds ratio-OR 0.93; 95% confidence interval 0.92-0.95). There was no difference in PICC migration between side and limb of insertion.

CONCLUSION

PICC tips can be identified without injection of a radiopaque agent. Serial radiographs identified PICC migration over the in situ duration. This study has implications for reducing exposure to a radiopaque agent and ongoing migration surveillance practices.

A review of neonatal peripherally inserted central venous catheters in extremely or very low birthweight infants based on a 3-year clinical practice: Complication incidences and risk factors

BACKGROUND

The application of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) in neonates has proven effective in avoiding repetitive insertions and excessive use of transfusion consumables. However, the frequent occurrence of PICC-associated complications deserves special attention, especially in extremely or very low birthweight (E/VLBW) infants, which in turn affects the quality of neonatal PICC practice. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study of a 3-year clinical practice of neonatal PICCs in E/VLBW infants to understand the incidences of various catheter-related complications and their risk factors to help form an empirical summary and evidence-based guidance for the improvement of practice.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted based on a 3-year practice of neonatal PICCs in E/VLBW infants. Neonatal health records were collected, including demographic characteristics, PICC placement data, and treatment information.

RESULTS

A total of 519 E/VLBW infants were included in this study. There were 77 cases of complications involving 72 infants with an overall incidence of 12.13%. The order of incidences of different complications from high to low was phlebitis (7.71%), malposition (3.66%), leakage (1.35%), pleural effusion (1.15%), central line-associated bloodstream infection (0.58%, 0.25/1,000d), and accidental removal (0.38%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the inserted vessel was an independent risk factor for PICC-associated complications (mainly phlebitis; p = 0.002). Neonatal PICCs inserted in the axillary vein were only one-tenth (p = 0.026) as likely to cause phlebitis as in the basilic vein, whereas when applied in the saphenous vein, neonatal PICCs were five times as likely to cause phlebitis (p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

E/VLBW infants might be more inclined to develop PICC-associated phlebitis. Catheters inserted in the axillary or basilic vein are preferred if possible.

Estimating the Insertion Depth of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Newborns Using Weight and Gestational Age Measurements

The objective of this study was to estimate the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion depth in newborns. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 790 neonates who underwent PICC insertion for intravenous injections administered for 6 days or more following neonatal intensive care unit admission at our institution between January 2011 and October 2015. We analyzed patients' electronic medical records and chest standard radiographs. PICC insertion depths were calculated using the following equation: Insertion depth = Section + (β1 × Body weight). The predicted equation was checked for accuracy using Bland-Altman plots. Of 835 included neonates, 790 (94.6%) had properly positioned PICCs. Forty-three of 45 unsuitable patients (5.4%) had catheters inserted into the cephalic veins. Of the 790 patients with correctly inserted catheter tips, regression equations and standard errors were calculated for the average insertion depth and timing of PICC insertion. The catheter depth increased with every 100 g of weight gain and week of gestational age. More than 90% of the 4 vessels incorporating PICCs were included within the standard deviation of ±2.0, indicating high predictive validity. This study established a standard for accurately measuring PICC insertion depths.

Prevalence of complications associated with the use of a peripherally inserted central catheter in newborns: A systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

The improper handling of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in newborns (NBs) may result in mechanical and infectious complications.

AIM

The aim of this systematic review (SR) is to estimate the prevalence of complications associated with the use of PICC in NBs.

METHODS

We will utilize PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Google Scholar for the databases search. There will be no restrictions on the search for languages, and observational studies will be selected wherein the prevalence rate of complications associated with the use of PICC in NBs has been presented or can be calculated. The systematic review will follow the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Two reviewers will independently select studies and assess their eligibility using predefined criteria. Using standardized forms, two other reviewers will independently extract data from each included study, and the random-effects pooled prevalence will be calculated in the meta-analysis with the respective 95% confidence intervals. The methodological quality of the studies will be assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Review Manager V.5.3.5 will be used for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. A protocol was developed and published on PROSPERO (Registration number CRD42020211983).

EXPECTED RESULTS

This SR will show the prevalence of complications caused by the inadequate management of PICC in NBs, which is information considered important for clinical practice improvement.

Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter complications in neonates

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors associated with nonelective PICC removal and complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Overall, 1234 PICCs were placed in 918 hospitalized infants <45 weeks postmenstrual age. Outcomes studied include nonelective PICC removal (removal prior to completion of therapy) and line complications. Univariate and multivariate mixed-effects logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the associations between potential predictor variables and clinical outcomes RESULTS: Nonelective PICC removal occurred in 28.4% and complications in 34.4% of infants. Nonelective removal (p < 0.001) and complications (p = 0.006) occurred more often with upper than lower extremity PICCs. Malposition in the first 72 h (p = 0.0009) and over time (p = 0.0003) were more common in upper extremity PICCS; however, upper extremity PICCs were associated with a decreased incidence of phlebitis, edema, and perfusion changes (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one-third of PICCs were associated with complications. When feasible, lower extremity PICCs should be placed as they may be associated with fewer complications.

Evidências sobre prevenção de lesões de pele em recém-nascidos: revisão integrativa

Objetivo: identificar estratégias para a prevenção de lesões de pele em recém-nascidos (RN) hospitalizados, publicadas em periódicos científicos no período de 2013 a 2018. Método: revisão integrativa de literatura realizada em dois momentos de busca em bases de dados, sendo selecionados 37 estudos publicados entre os anos de 2013 e 2018. Resultados: termorregulação, uso de antisséptico, uso de emolientes e limpeza do coto umbilical foram as recomendações mais encontradas. Entre as práticas baseadas em evidência, destacam-se as que previnem o risco de hipotermia, como o uso de saco de polietileno e o contato pele a pele, que respaldam a assistência e que garantem segurança no cuidado do paciente neonatal. Conclusão: a prevenção de lesões de pele é um tema relevante, entretanto, existe escassez de evidências robustas para sustentar, com segurança, as práticas de cuidados com o RN. Observa-se ainda que as evidências são insuficientes para englobar o universo do tema, demonstrando que o cuidado com a pele é um tema que demanda investimentos e mais pesquisas.

Evidence on prevention of skin lesions in newborns: integrative review

Objective: To identify strategies for the prevention of skin lesions in hospitalized newborns (NBs), published in scientific journals from 2013 to 2018. Method: Integrative literature review performed in two moments of database search, selecting 37 studies published between 2013 and 2018. Results: Thermoregulation, use of antiseptic, use of emollients and cleaning of the umbilical stump were the most commonly found recommendations. Among the evidence-based practices, we highlight those that prevent the risk of hypothermia, such as the use of a polyethylene bag and skin-to-skin contact, which support the assistance and ensure safety in the care of the neonatal patient. Conclusion: The prevention of skin lesions is a relevant topic. However, there is a scarcity of robust evidence to safely sustain NB care practices. It is also observed that the evidence is insufficient to encompass the universe of the theme, demonstrating that skin care is a theme that requires investment and more research.

[Central venous access in interventional radiology]

Some patients require iteratives intravenous administrations on a central catheter, for example in oncology or infectiology, which represents a challenge for ambulatory treatment. Interventional radiology could provide solutions with the implant and monitoring of PICC-lines and ports. These are implanted in sterile environment and under imaging guidance in an interventional radiology room by an operator and with a paramedical team that need to be experienced. This development focus on the interest of one method with respect to the other, as well as the differents ways to do, the complications that could arise and the monitoring of these devices.

Complications of upper extremity versus lower extremity placed peripherally inserted central catheters in neonatal intensive care units: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risks of catheter-related complications between peripherally inserted central catheters placed via the upper and lower extremities in neonatal intensive care units.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

PUBMED, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to 3 January 2019. All studies were of patients in neonatal intensive care units who underwent insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters and were published in English.

RESULTS

Eight studies covering 4405 peripherally inserted central catheters were included. The upper extremity group was associated with a higher risk of non-elective removal (OR = 1.41; 95% 1.16-1.72; p = 0.0007) and malposition (OR = 4.52, 95% CI 2.16-9.47; p < 0.0001) and a lower risk of thrombosis (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07-0.77; p = 0.02) compared with the lower extremity group. There was no significant difference in mechanical complications, catheter-related infection, or phlebitis.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis showed that the lower extremity group was not associated with worse outcomes compared with the upper extremity group in the neonatal intensive care unit, with the exception of thrombosis. However, further prospective randomised controlled studies are needed to ensure the quality of the results.

Umbilical Venous Catheters and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Are They Equally Safe in VLBW Infants? A Non-Randomized Single Center Study

Background and Objective: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) and umbilical venous catheters (UVC) are frequently used for vascular access in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). While there is a significant need for these devices for critically ill neonates, there are many complications associated with their use. We aimed at investigating the incidence of UVC and PICC complications in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Materials and Methods: This is an observational study performed with neonates of the tertiary General Hospital of Piraeus, Greece, during an 18 month-period. Seventy-one neonates were recruited and divided into two groups: 34 neonates with PICC and 37 neonates with UVC. We recorded: Catheter dwell time, the causes of catheter removal, other complications, infections, and catheter tip colonization rates. Results: No significant statistical differences were noticed between the 2 study groups with regards to demographic characteristics, causes for catheter removal, catheter indwelling time or the incidence of nosocomial infection. Eleven UVC tips and no PICC tips were proved colonized (p = 0.001) following catheter removal. Conclusions: The incidence of complications associated with the use of UVCs and PICCs in VLBW infants did not significantly differ in our study. Their use seems to be equally safe. Further studies, with larger samples, are necessary to confirm our results.

Prediction of Nonelective Central Venous Catheter Removal in Medically Complex Neonates

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Introduction:

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential to neonatal care but associated with significant morbidity. Nonelective CVC removal (NER) is an inadequately studied outcome associated with increased morbidity, infant and family stress, and cost. This study describes prevalence and predictors of NER in infants admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit and NER variation between peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), cutdown PICCs, and surgical CVCs.

Methods:

In this study, we include patient and catheter data for infants admitted to a level IV neonatal intensive care unit (2010–2015). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Kruskal-Wallis, and chi-square tests for continuous, non-normally distributed continuous, and categorical variables, respectively. The association between NER due to complication and infant and catheter characteristics was assessed using generalized linear mixed models.

Results:

Patient and catheter characteristics vary significantly by catheter type. The overall rate of NER is 15% (17% PICCs, 13% cutdown PICCs, and 19% surgical CVCs). The most common indications for NER are catheter breakage, blood stream infection(BSI)/central line-associated blood stream infection(CLABSI), catheter malposition, mechanical obstruction, and extravasation. Birth weight, patient diagnosis, catheter dwell time, and concurrent catheters are associated with increased odds of NER.

Conclusions:

Patient risk factors and potentially modifiable catheter characteristics, including catheter dwell time and concurrent catheters, are associated with increased NER. As NER is associated with a broad spectrum of adverse outcomes, we propose a quality improvement strategy to risk stratify patients and reduce exposure to high-risk, modifiable catheter characteristics.

Application of peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill newborns experience from a neonatal intensive care unit

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) can provide nutritional and medical support for very low birth weight or critically ill newborns. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the use of PICCs in our clinic for critically ill newborns to evaluate the relationship between catheter related factors and the occurrence of complications.Retrospective analysis was conducted for all newborns consecutively admitted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, who underwent PICC insertion between May 2011 and March 2018. Data collected included total puncture success rate, one puncture success rate, infection rate, complication rate, unplanned catheter withdrawal rate, device days, and catheter indwelling time.Five-hundred eighty-eight infants (304 males and 284 females) aged 3.4 ± 3.9 days, mean gestational age of 30.9 ± 2.7 weeks and a mean body mass of 1.38 ± 0.47 kg at insertion were included. Total puncture success rate was 99.65%, one puncture success rate was 77.77%. The mean catheter retention was 13.6 ± 6.7 days: more than 30 days in 15 (2.61%) cases, 20 to 30 days in 60 (10.43%) cases, 10 to 19 days in 372 (64.70%) cases, and 62 days in 1 case. Complications occurred in 63 (10.71%) cases: with PICC insertion within 24 hours after birth in 29 (15.43%), within 48 hours in 13 (6.63%), and after 48 hours in 21 (10.99%) cases. Catheter tip culture was positive in 3 cases and there was 1 case of catheter-related bloodstream infection.Nursing measures of the maintenance of body temperature and the evaluation of blood vessels were important conditions for improving the success rate of one puncture in critically ill neonates. PICC catheterization as early as 48 hours will not increase the difficulty of PICC puncture. Nor did it increase the incidence of PICC complications.

The axillary vein and its tributaries are not in the mirror image of the axillary artery and its branches

INTRODUCTION

The axillary and cephalic veins are used for various clinical purposes but their anatomy is not fully understood. Increased knowledge and information about them as well as superficial veins in the upper arm would be useful.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to contribute to the literature regarding the anatomy of the venous drainage of the upper extremity.

METHODS

The veins of forty upper extremities from twenty one adult cadavers were injected and their axillary regions dissected. The course and pattern of drainage of the venous tributaries in the axillary region were identified and recorded.

RESULTS

The basilic, brachial, subscapular, lateral thoracic and superior thoracic veins drained mainly into the axillary vein, in common with most textbook descriptions. However, the thoracoacromial veins were observed to drain into the cephalic vein in 70.0% of upper limbs. In addition, a venous channel connecting the distal part and proximal part of the axilla was found along the posterolateral wall of the axilla in 77.5% of the upper limbs. In 95.0% of upper limbs, we discovered a superficial vein which ran from the axillary base and drained directly into the axillary vein.

CONCLUSION

The veins from the inferomedial part of the axilla drain into the axillary vein, whereas the veins from the superolateral part of the axilla drain into the cephalic vein. The venous drainage of the axilla is variable and in common with venous drainage elsewhere, does not necessarily follow the pattern of the arterial supply.

Risk factors associated with adverse events in neonates with peripherally inserted central catheter

BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters have become a priority in infants who require long-term intravenous therapy, but their use involves certain risks.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to describe the occurrence of adverse events in newborns with peripherally inserted central catheters and to determine the risk factors associated with them.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was designed and performed. All neonates with peripherally inserted central catheters from October 1st, 2014 to September 30th, 2015 were included. The adverse events and sociodemographic and clinical variables related to neonates and analyzed catheters were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 140 catheters were placed in 116 infants. All of them were analyzed. Adverse events occurred in 16.4%: catheter-associated bacteraemia (5.7%), obstruction (5.7%), extravasation (2.1%) and phlebitis (2.1%), <27weeks of pregnancy (OR=1.2, P=.02), birth weight <1000g (OR=6.7, P=.02), with catheters in situ for longer than one week (OR=9.8, P=.02) and with perfusion of antibiotics per catheter (OR=1.3, P<.01). Phlebitis is associated with the insertion of the catheter in LL and head (OR=1.1, P=.03). Factors associated with bacteraemia risk with adjusted prevalence odds ratio are extremely low birth weight neonates (OR=6.38; P=.03) and with a catheter in situ for longer than one week (OR=9.41; P=.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The periodic evaluation of catheter-related adverse events is very useful to prepare improvement plans. This will maximize safety for the most vulnerable newborns, especially those of extremely low birth weight that require very long treatments.

Central line-associated bloodstream infections in neonates

Newborn infants, including premature infants, are high-risk patients susceptible to various microorganisms. Catheter-related bloodstream infections are the most common type of nosocomial infections in this population. Regular education and training of medical staffs are most important as a preventive strategy for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Bundle approaches and the use of checklists during the insertion and maintenance of central catheters are effective measures to reduce the incidence of CLABSIs. Chlorhexidine, commonly used as a skin disinfectant before catheter insertion and dressing replacement, is not approved for infants <2 months of age, but is usually used in many neonatal intensive care units due to the lack of alternatives. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing and bathing, recommended for adults, cannot be applied to newborns. Appropriate replacement intervals for dressing and administration sets are similar to those recommended for adults. Umbilical catheters should not be used longer than 5 days for the umbilical arterial catheter and 14 days for the umbilical venous catheter. It is most important to regularly educate, train and give feedback to the medical staffs about the various preventive measures required at each stage from before insertion to removal of the catheter. Continuous efforts are needed to develop effective and safe infection control strategies for neonates and young infants.

Risk Factors Related to Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter Nonselective Removal in Neonates

We aimed to investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with nonselective removal of peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in neonates. In this prospective cohort study, neonates who underwent PICC placement at neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in China from October 2012 to November 2015 were included. The patient demographics, catheter characteristics, catheter duration, PICC insertion site, indication for PICC insertion, infuscate composition, PICC tip location, and catheter complications were recorded in a computerized database. Risk factors for nonselective removal were analyzed. A total of 497 PICCs were placed in 496 neonates. Nonselective removal occurred in 9.3% of PICCs during 10,540 catheter-days (4.6 nonselective removals per 1,000 catheter-days). These included occlusion (3%), infection (1.4%), leakage (2.0%), phlebitis (0.6%), displacement (1%), pleural effusion(0.6%), and breaks (0.6%). Noncentral tip position was independently associated with an increased risk of nonselective removal (odds ratio 2.621; 95% confidence interval, 1.258-5.461) after adjusting for gestational age, sex, birth weight, and PICC dwell time. No significant differences in the rate of complications occurred between silastic and polyurethane PICC or different insertion sites. Noncentral PICC tip position was the only independent risk factor for nonselective removal of PICC.

Pediatric arterial catheters: Complications and associated risk factors

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Arterial catheter complications are a common problem in a pediatric critical care setting, but reported complication rates and risk factors associated with peripheral arterial catheter complications vary. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify risk factors in a pediatric patient population.

METHODS

We performed a detailed abstraction of provider notes in the electronic medical records of inpatients ≤18years of age who underwent arterial line placement between January 1, 2008 and January 1, 2013 at a university-affiliated standalone pediatric hospital. Inpatient records were assessed for complications associated with arterial catheterization and risk factors inherent to arterial catheter insertion.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-eight children were identified, of whom 75 (33%) had a total of 106 arterial catheter complications. Complications included line malfunctions (59%, n=63), bleeding (16%, n=17), multiple complications (11%, n=12), infiltration (8%, n=9), and hematoma (4%, n=4). Line malfunction was reported in all patients with multiple complications. Independent predictors of complications associated with arterial catheterization were the presence of more than one provider during the insertion (p=0.007) and insertion attempts at multiple sites (p=0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests the need for a prospective study to comprehensively assess provider-related risk factors associated with arterial catheter complications in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Peripherally inserted central catheter in extremely preterm infants: Characteristics and influencing factors

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the duration of catheter stay, incidence of non-elective removal and rates of complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in relation to different catheter positions in extremely preterm infants (EPT, <28 weeks of gestation).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) inserted in EPT infants over a 10-year period, from January 2004 through December 2013 (mean gestational age, 25.2 weeks; mean birth weight, 727 g).

RESULTS

Of the 379 PICCs analyzed, the majority of lines (68%) were placed in the central position, and 259 PICCs (56%) were removed electively after fulfilment of the treatment. Significantly more PICCs in the lower extremities compared to the upper extremities were in central positions (86% vs 61%, p < 0.001, respectively). Significantly more PICCs that were removed electively after fulfilment of the treatment were in a central position compared to a non-central position (p < 0.001). Of the 166 catheters that were removed because of complications, most (71%) of them had mechanical problems, and 13% had sepsis resulting in an incidence rate of 4.4/1000 catheter days.

CONCLUSION

PICCs inserted in the lower extremity were more likely to have a centrally placed tip position compared to PICC lines inserted in the upper extremities.

Indications and outcomes for tunneled central venous line placement via the axillary vein in children

PURPOSE

To assess the indications, safety and outcomes of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) placed via a cutdown approach into the axillary vein in children, an approach not well described in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on pediatric patients who received CVCs via open cannulation of the axillary vein or one of its tributaries between January 2006 and October 2016 at two hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 24 axillary CVCs were placed in 20 patients [10 male (42%); mean weight 7.0 kg (SD 2.9); mean age 10 months (SD 6)]. The most common indications for axillary vein access included neck or chest wall challenges (tracheostomies or chest wall wounds) (n = 18). The median duration of line placement was 140 days (IQR 146). The most common indications for removal were completion of therapy (n = 7, 39%) and infection (n = 5, 28%). There were no early complications. Long-term complications included infection (n = 5) or catheter malfunction (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

Tunneled CVC placement via a cutdown approach into the axillary vein or its tributary can be an effective alternative approach to obtain long-term vascular access in children. Outcomes may be comparable to lines placed in traditional internal jugular and subclavian vein locations.

Randomized controlled trials in central vascular access devices: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for central venous access devices, however, high complication rates remain. Scoping reviews map the available evidence and demonstrate evidence deficiencies to focus ongoing research priorities.

METHOD

A scoping review (January 2006-December 2015) of randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to improve central venous access device outcomes; including peripherally inserted central catheters, non-tunneled, tunneled and totally implanted venous access catheters. MeSH terms were used to undertake a systematic search with data extracted by two independent researchers, using a standardized data extraction form.

RESULTS

In total, 178 trials were included (78 non-tunneled [44%]; 40 peripherally inserted central catheters [22%]; 20 totally implanted [11%]; 12 tunneled [6%]; 6 non-specified [3%]; and 22 combined device trials [12%]). There were 119 trials (68%) involving adult participants only, with 18 (9%) pediatric and 20 (11%) neonatal trials. Insertion-related themes existed in 38% of trials (67 RCTs), 35 RCTs (20%) related to post-insertion patency, with fewer trials on infection prevention (15 RCTs, 8%), education (14RCTs, 8%), and dressing and securement (12 RCTs, 7%). There were 46 different study outcomes reported, with the most common being infection outcomes (161 outcomes; 37%), with divergent definitions used for catheter-related bloodstream and other infections.

CONCLUSION

More high quality randomized trials across central venous access device management are necessary, especially in dressing and securement and patency. These can be encouraged by having more studies with multidisciplinary team involvement and consumer engagement. Additionally, there were extensive gaps within population sub-groups, particularly in tunneled devices, and in pediatrics and neonates. Finally, outcome definitions need to be unified for results to be meaningful and comparable across studies.

Peripherally inserted central catheters optimize nutrient intake in moderately preterm infants

BACKGROUND

While very preterm (<32 wk gestation) infants are routinely provided intensive nutritional support via central line, clinical practice varies for nutrient delivery in infants born moderately preterm (32-34 wk gestation). We sought to define the impact of nutritional support via peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) on nutrient delivery in the first 2 wk of life and growth by discharge.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the records of 187 infants born between 32 and 34 6/7 wk gestation and admitted to the University of Iowa Children's Hospital between April 2012 and December 2013. Records of all feedings, weights, and PICC placements were collected. The growth outcomes at discharge for infants who received nutrition via PICC were compared to those who did not.

RESULTS

In the first week of life, newborns who received nutrition via PICC line received 17.6 more kilocalories (confidence interval (CI): 12.5-22.7, P < 0.001) and 1.2 more grams protein per kilogram body weight per day (CI: 0.9-1.4, P < 0.001) compared to control infants. By discharge, the PICC group had gained 302 g more body weight (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates superior nutrient intake and growth in the first 2 wk of life for infants who received nutrition via PICC line.

[Catheter tip position and risk of mechanical complications in a neonatal unit]

INTRODUCTION

The use of central catheters (CC) is associated with mechanical complications (MC).

OBJECTIVE

Our objetive was to determine the relationship between CC positions and associated MC in neonates.

MATERIAL

A descriptive analytical study was performed over a six year period in the NICU of the University Hospital Santa Lucía de Cartagena. Details were collected on the CC used, indication, reason for withdrawal, position in the imaging, MC, and treatment arising from them, as well as epidemiological data.

RESULTS

Of the total of 604 CC studied, the majority (347) were via the umbilical vein, followed by epicutaneous (193), and femoral vein (34). There were MC in 14.2% of catheters. Incorrect position of the tip was associated with greater MC (21.1 vs 8.2%; P<.001), including withdrawal due to MC (8.4 vs 3.1%; P<.01), extravasation (4.9 vs 1.9%; P<.05), pleural and pericardial effusions (1.4 vs 0.0%; P<.05), liver haematomas (4.6 vs 0.6%; P<.01), and ascites (2.8 vs 0.0%; P<.01). The midclavicular epicutaneous position of the tip was associated with greater MC (18.5 vs 6.8%; P<.05) than the brachiocephalic (0 vs 6.8%;NS). The low and ductal position of the umbilical vein catheter was also associated with higher rates of MC (24.5 vs 6%; P<.001 and 27 vs 6%; P<.001) due to the position of the tip. The most common complication was accidentally dislodged catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

The incorrect location of the tip was associated with more MC. The midclavicular epicutaneous had more risk than centrally or brachiocephalic locations. The low and ductal positions of the umbilical vein catheter were associated with higher rates of MC.