Impact of a dedicated neonatal stabilization room and process changes on stabilization time

Using Simulation to Support Evidence-Based Design of Safer Health Care Environments

The design of health care environments and the technologies used within them have tremendous influence on the performance of the professionals who care for patients in those spaces. In turn, the performance of those professionals greatly impacts the safety of the care that is delivered to patients. Active and latent safety errors can be greatly reduced by rigorous testing of the patient care environment. · Prior to the approval of final design specifications and actual construction.. · After construction is complete before the first patients move in.. · On an ongoing basis once patient care is in progress.. While there are numerous types of testing that can be conducted, this manuscript will focus on the use of simulated clinical scenarios in realistic/real physical environments to detect and remediate weaknesses in the design of those environments with a focus on their use in perinatal centers. KEY POINTS: · Environmental design influences human performance.. · Realistic clinical simulation can improve the design.. · Simulation should be done on a continuous basis..

Quality improvement in the golden hour for premature infants: a scoping review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Evidence-based research has shown that golden hour quality improvement (QI) measures can improve the quality of care and reduce serious complications of premature infants. Herein, we sought to review golden hour QI studies to evaluate the impact on the outcome of preterm infants.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and SinoMed databases from inception to April 03, 2023. Only studies describing QI interventions in the golden hour of preterm infants were included. Outcomes were summarized and qualitative synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

Ten studies were eligible for inclusion. All studies were from single centers, of which nine were conducted in the USA and one in Israel. Seven were pre-post comparative studies and three were observational studies. Most included studies were of medium quality (80%). The most common primary outcome was admission temperatures and glucose. Five studies (n = 2308) reported improvements in the admission temperature and three studies (n = 2052) reported improvements in hypoglycemia after QI. Four studies (n = 907) showed that the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was lower in preterm infants after QI: 106/408 (26.0%) vs. 122/424(29.5%) [OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97, p = 0.04].

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the golden hour QI bundle can improve the short-term and long-term outcomes for extremely preterm infants. There was considerable heterogeneity and deficiencies in the included studies, and the variation in impact on outcomes suggests the need to use standardized and validated measures. Future studies are needed to develop locally appropriate, high-quality, and replicable QI projects.

Huddles and their effectiveness at the frontlines of clinical care: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Brief, stand-up meetings known as huddles may improve clinical care, but knowledge about huddle implementation and effectiveness at the frontlines is fragmented and setting specific. This work provides a comprehensive overview of huddles used in diverse health care settings, examines the empirical support for huddle effectiveness, and identifies knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research.

METHODS

A scoping review was completed by searching the databases PubMed, EBSCOhost, ProQuest, and OvidSP for studies published in English from inception to May 31, 2019. Eligible studies described huddles that (1) took place in a clinical or medical setting providing health care patient services, (2) included frontline staff members, (3) were used to improve care quality, and (4) were studied empirically. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts; seven reviewers independently abstracted data from full texts.

RESULTS

Of 2,185 identified studies, 158 met inclusion criteria. The majority (67.7%) of studies described huddles used to improve team communication, collaboration, and/or coordination. Huddles positively impacted team process outcomes in 67.7% of studies, including improvements in efficiency, process-based functioning, and communication across clinical roles (64.4%); situational awareness and staff perceptions of safety and safety climate (44.6%); and staff satisfaction and engagement (29.7%). Almost half of studies (44.3%) reported huddles positively impacting clinical care outcomes such as patients receiving timely and/or evidence-based assessments and care (31.4%); decreased medical errors and adverse drug events (24.3%); and decreased rates of other negative outcomes (20.0%).

DISCUSSION

Huddles involving frontline staff are an increasingly prevalent practice across diverse health care settings. Huddles are generally interdisciplinary and aimed at improving team communication, collaboration, and/or coordination. Data from the scoping review point to the effectiveness of huddles at improving work and team process outcomes and indicate the positive impact of huddles can extend beyond processes to include improvements in clinical outcomes.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This scoping review was registered with the Open Science Framework on 18 January 2019 ( https://osf.io/bdj2x/ ).