The quest for sustained multiple morbidity reduction in very low-birth-weight infants: the Antifragility project

Quality Improvement Interventions to Prevent Intraventricular Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Quality improvement may reduce the incidence and severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. We evaluated quality improvement interventions (QIIs) that sought to prevent or reduce the severity of intraventricular hemorrhage.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and citations of selected articles were searched. QIIs that had reducing incidence or severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants as the primary outcome. Paired reviewers independently extracted data from selected studies.

RESULTS

Eighteen quality improvement interventions involving 5906 infants were included. Clinical interventions in antenatal care, the delivery room, and the NICU were used in the QIIs. Four of 10 QIIs reporting data on intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and 9 of 14 QIIs reporting data on severe IVH saw improvements. The median Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set score was 11 of 16. Clinical intervention heterogeneity and incomplete information on quality improvement methods challenged the identification of the main reason for the observed changes. Publication bias may result in the inclusion of more favorable findings.

CONCLUSIONS

QIIs demonstrated reductions in the incidence and severity of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants in some but not all settings. Which specific interventions and quality improvement methods were responsible for those reductions and why they were successful in some settings but not others are not clear. This systematic review can assist teams in identifying potentially better practices for reducing IVH, but improvements in reporting and assessing QIIs are needed if systematic reviews are to realize their potential for guiding evidence-based practice.

Antifragility and antiinflammaging: Can they play a role for a healthy longevity?

One of the most exciting challenges of the research on aging is to explain how the environmental factors interact with the genetic background to modulate the chances to reach the extreme limit of human life in healthy conditions. The complex epigenetic mechanisms can explain both the interaction between DNA and environmental factors, and the long-distance persistence of lifestyle effects, due to the so called "epigenetic memory". One of the most extensively investigated theories on aging focuses on the inflammatory responses, suggesting that the age-related progression of low-grade and therefore for long time subclinical, chronic, systemic, inflammatory process, named "inflammaging", could be the most relevant risk factor for the development and progression of the most common age-related diseases and ultimately of death. The results of many studies on long-lived people, especially on centenarians, suggested that healthy old people can cope with inflammaging upregulating the antiinflammaging responses. Overall, a genetic make-up coding for a strong antiinflammaging response and an age-related ability to remodel key metabolic pathways to cope with a plethora of antigens and stressors seem to be the best ways for reach the extreme limit of human lifespan in health status. In this scenario, we wondered if the antifragility concept, recently developed in the framework of business and risk analysis, could add some information to disentangle the heterogeneous nature of the aging process in human. The antifragility is the property of the complex systems to increase their performances because of high stress. Based on this theory we were wondering if some subjects could be able to modulate faster than others their epigenome to cope with a plethora of stressors during life, probably modulating the inflammatory and anti-inflammatory responses. In this framework, antifragility could share some common mechanisms with anti-inflammaging, modulating the ability to restrain the inflammatory responses, so that antifragility and antiinflammaging could be viewed as different pieces of the same puzzle, both impinging upon the chances to travel along the healthy aging trajectory.

Reduction of Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage in Preterm Infants: A Quality Improvement Project

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this quality improvement project was to reduce the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (sIVH) by 50% within 3 years for extremely preterm infants born at a children's teaching hospital.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team developed key drivers for the development of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. Targeted interventions included the development of potentially better practice guidelines, promoting early noninvasive ventilation, consistent use of rescue antenatal betamethasone, and risk-based indomethacin prophylaxis. The outcome measure was the rate of sIVH. Process measures included the rate of intubation within 24 hours and receipt of rescue betamethasone and risk-based indomethacin prophylaxis. Common markers of morbidity were balancing measures. Data were collected from a quarterly chart review and analyzed with statistical process control charts. The preintervention period was from January 2012 to March 2016, implementation period was from April 2016 to December 2018, and sustainment period was through June 2020.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 268 inborn neonates born at <28 weeks' gestation or <1000 g (127 preintervention and 141 postintervention). The rate of sIVH decreased from 14% to 1.2%, with sustained improvement over 2 and a half years. Mortality also decreased by 50% during the same time period. This was associated with adherence to process measures and no change in balancing measures.

CONCLUSIONS

A multipronged quality improvement approach to intraventricular hemorrhage prevention, including evidence-based practice guidelines, consistent receipt of rescue betamethasone and indomethacin prophylaxis, and decreasing early intubation was associated with a sustained reduction in sIVH in extremely preterm infants.

Paving New Roads Towards Biodiversity-Based Drug Development in Brazil: Lessons from the Past and Future Perspectives

Although Brazil gathers two fundamental features to occupy a leading position on the development of biodiversity-based medicines, the largest flora on earth and a broad tradition on the use of medicinal plants, the number of products derived from the national genetic heritage is so far modest, either as single drugs or as herbal medicines. This article highlights some aspects that may have contributed to the low rates of success and proposes new insights for innovation. We initially approach the use of medicinal plants in Brazil, molded by its ethnic diversity, and the development of the local pharmaceutical industry. A discussion of some governmental initiatives to support plant-based drug development is then presented. Employing the economic concept of “middle-income trap,” we further propose that Brazil is stuck in a “middle-level science trap,” since the increase in the number of scientific publications that launched the country to an intermediate publishing position has not been translated into drug development. Two new approaches to escape from this trap are presented, which may result in innovative drug development. The first is based on the exploitation of the antifragility properties of herbal products aiming to investigate non-canonical pharmacodynamics mechanisms of action, aligned with the concepts of system biology. The second is the manufacture of herbal products based on the circular economy principles, including the use of byproducts for the development of new therapeutical agents. The adoption of these strategies may result in innovative phytomedicines, with global competitiveness.

Sustained quality improvement collaboration and composite morbidity reduction in extremely low gestational age newborns

AIM

Continuous quality improvement has failed to consistently reduce morbidities in extremely low gestational age newborns 23-27 weeks. 10 Vermont Oxford Network NICUs describe a novel, sustained collaboration for progress.

METHODS

We emphasised a) commitment to inter-NICU trust with face-to-face meetings, site visits, teleconferences, scrutiny of quality improvement methodology, b) transparent process and outcomes sharing, c) evidence-based formulation of an orchestrated testing matrix to select potentially better practices, d) family integration, e) benchmarking with a composite mortality-morbidity score (Benefit Metric).

RESULTS

A total of 4709 infants, mean (SD) gestational age 25.8 (1.4) weeks, admitted to 10 NICUs 1.01.2010 to 12.31.2016. The orchestrated matrix offered 45 potentially better practices; NICUs implemented mean 29 (range 19-40). There was widespread adoption of delivery room, respiratory care and infection prevention practices, but no uniform pattern. Our Benefit Metric was significantly greater than the Vermont Oxford Network all seven years (p < 0.001). Six major morbidities decreased, two significantly (p < 0.05), mortality unchanged (14%). 34% of survivors had no morbidities, 35% just one.

CONCLUSION

Cultivating trust, transparent outcomes sharing, and tailored, potentially better practice selection is associated with encouraging improvement in 23- to 27-week survival without morbidity. Our outcomes are objective but the optimal implementation pathway to sustain progress remains murky, reflective of NICUs as complex adaptive networks.

Using a composite morbidity score and cultural survey to explore characteristics of high proficiency neonatal intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) collaboration has not eliminated the morbidity variability seen among neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Factors other than inconstant application of potentially better practices (PBPs) might explain divergent proficiency.

OBJECTIVE

Measure a composite morbidity score and determine whether cultural, environmental and cognitive factors distinguish high proficiency from lower proficiency NICUs.

DESIGN/METHODS

Retrospective analysis using a risk-adjusted composite morbidity score (Benefit Metric) and cultural survey focusing on very low birth weight (VLBW) infants from 39 NICUs, years 2000-2014. The Benefit Metric and yearly variance from the group mean was rank-ordered by NICU. A comprehensive survey was completed by each NICU exploring whether morbidity variance correlated with CQI methodology, cultural, environmental and/or cognitive characteristics.

RESULTS

58 272 VLBW infants were included, mean (SD) age 28.2 (3.0) weeks, birth weight 1031 (301) g. The 39 NICU groups' Benefit Metric improved 40%, from 80 in 2000 to 112 in 2014 (P<0.001). 14 NICUs had composite morbidity scores significantly better than the group, 16 did not differ and 9 scored below the group mean. The 14 highest performing NICUs were characterised by more effective team work, superior morale, greater problem-solving expectations of providers, enhanced learning opportunities, knowledge of CQI fundamentals and more generous staffing.

CONCLUSION

Cultural, environmental and cognitive characteristics vary among NICUs perhaps more than traditional CQI methodology and PBPs, possibly explaining the inconstancy of VLBW infant morbidity reduction efforts. High proficiency NICUs foster spirited team work and camaraderie, sustained learning opportunities and support of favourable staffing that allows problem solving and widespread involvement in CQI activities.