Genesis of analgesic nephropathy in the United Kingdom

Combined analgesics in (headache) pain therapy: shotgun approach or precise multi-target therapeutics?

BACKGROUND

Pain in general and headache in particular are characterized by a change in activity in brain areas involved in pain processing. The therapeutic challenge is to identify drugs with molecular targets that restore the healthy state, resulting in meaningful pain relief or even freedom from pain. Different aspects of pain perception, i.e. sensory and affective components, also explain why there is not just one single target structure for therapeutic approaches to pain. A network of brain areas ("pain matrix") are involved in pain perception and pain control. This diversification of the pain system explains why a wide range of molecularly different substances can be used in the treatment of different pain states and why in recent years more and more studies have described a superior efficacy of a precise multi-target combination therapy compared to therapy with monotherapeutics.

DISCUSSION

In this article, we discuss the available literature on the effects of several fixed-dose combinations in the treatment of headaches and discuss the evidence in support of the role of combination therapy in the pharmacotherapy of pain, particularly of headaches. The scientific rationale behind multi-target combinations is the therapeutic benefit that could not be achieved by the individual constituents and that the single substances of the combinations act together additively or even multiplicatively and cooperate to achieve a completeness of the desired therapeutic effect.As an example the fixed-dose combination of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), paracetamol (acetaminophen) and caffeine is reviewed in detail. The major advantage of using such a fixed combination is that the active ingredients act on different but distinct molecular targets and thus are able to act on more signalling cascades involved in pain than most single analgesics without adding more side effects to the therapy.

SUMMARY

Multitarget therapeutics like combined analgesics broaden the array of therapeutic options, enable the completeness of the therapeutic effect, and allow doctors (and, in self-medication with OTC medications, the patients themselves) to customize treatment to the patient's specific needs. There is substantial clinical evidence that such a multi-component therapy is more effective than mono-component therapies.

Non-phenacetin analgesics and analgesic nephropathy: clinical assessment of high users from a case-control study

BACKGROUND

A recent large-scale case-control study on analgesic nephropathy (SAN) [1] found no increased risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in users of combined or single formulations of phenacetin-free analgesics. In a subgroup of 22 high users, however, a dose-dependent increased risk was found, which raised the question if these patients presented or not with analgesic nephropathy (AN).

METHODS

The individual questionnaires of this subgroup of high users were reviewed, and the total lifetime intake of different types of analgesics was calculated. For evidence of AN, the following data were considered: (1) the amount and type of analgesics consumed, (2) the cause of ESRD, as diagnosed by the nephrologist in charge of the patient and (3) renal imaging and other relevant laboratory data.

RESULTS

This group of ESRD patients consumed on average 7.8 kg of antipyretic analgesics (range 30.8-2.7 kg) over an average of 21.5 years (range 35-6 years). Single analgesics were exclusively used by 12 patients (54.5%) and combined analgesics by 5 patients (22.7%), while 5 patients used both. None of the patients was diagnosed as having AN, and a review of the questionnaires did not disclose evidence suggestive of AN. The possibility that, irrespective of AN, the analgesic (ab)use contributed to the progression of existing renal diseases cannot be answered in the absence of well-defined criteria. The data supporting the existence of such an analgesic-associated nephropathy (AAN) are, however, not consistent and most likely due to confounding by indication.

CONCLUSION

In a group of ESRD patients with high use of non-phenacetin analgesics, no evidence of AN was found. There is no evidence that (ab)use of analgesics or NSAIDs other than phenacetin leads to a pathologically or clinically defined renal disease that could be named AN or AAN.

Caffeine as a promoter of analgesic-associated nephropathy--where is the evidence?

Individual groups of nephrologists - in their responsibility for their patients - initiated a most controversial discussion whether or not caffeine - coformulated to analgesics - might initiate or sustain analgesic overdosing. The original sources (data) of such suspicion have got lost during the debate of the last two decades. Therefore, it seemed to be appropriate to investigate the original data background and the reasons why nephrologists started to suspect caffeine as a stimulant of analgesic overdosing by employing a systematic and exhaustive review of primary nephrological publications. Their selection followed a precise selection plan, including all epidemiological studies on analgesic-associated nephropathy, the original papers of all groups having been involved in those studies, further originals from the mainly involved countries (academically, politically), and any literature thereof cited as a proof. The following results emerged from the investigation: (i) The epidemiological studies warranted no conclusion about a role of caffeine in prompting excessive analgesic use. (ii) The identified groups of nephrologists provided not substantial data to advocate the said suspicion, except for the observation of a preferential choice of phenacetin-containing combinations, especially powder preparations. (iii) Only two cited original data sources revealed drug-seeking behaviour with phenacetin-containing preparations which subsided, after phenacetin was banned from the respective markets. Conclusively, it appears that there is no substantial data to support a pivotal role of caffeine in initiating or sustaining analgesic overdosing. However, there is strong data that phenacetin, by its psychotropic properties, may have caused drug-seeking behaviour and thus led to analgesic overdosing. This conclusion is convincingly supported by thorough pharmacokinetic investigations. Note: All caffeine-related statements within the reviewed literature have been collected in tables (referred to as Table SX) which are provided in full text for check on the following website: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/products/journals/suppmat/FCP/FCP174/FCP174sm.htm

A safety assessment of fixed combinations of acetaminophen and acetylsalicylic acid, coformulated with caffeine

Overuse and abuse of phenacetin-containing mixed analgesics has contributed to end-stage renal disease. Combination analgesics, especially those coformulated with caffeine, have been implicated as imparting a greater risk of analgesic-associated nephropathy (AAN) than single or coformulated analgesics without caffeine. This has led to a recommendation that the sale of "two plus caffeine" analgesic mixtures be reclassified from over-the-counter to prescription only availability. There is a rational basis for coformulating acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and acetaminophen (paracetamol) as this reduces the dose of each, without altering efficacy. The coformulation of caffeine with these analgesics has a significant adjuvant effect and increases analgesic efficacy 1.4-1.6-fold. Currently available animal and human data do not support the notion that the nephrotoxic risk from coformulated ASA and acetaminophen is higher than the risk from either ASA or acetaminophen alone, in equivalent analgesic doses. There are no epidemiological data that implicate caffeine in AAN, and only limited evidence that links excessive acetaminophen usage to renal disease. There is no evidence that caffeine increases analgesics papillotoxicity directly. The presence of caffeine in mixtures of analgesics are no more addictive than other sources of caffeine. There is no evidence to suggest that adding caffeine to analgesic mixtures enhances the potential for promoting analgesic misuse in the general population. Thus distinct therapeutic benefits of ASA, acetaminophen and caffeine appear to outweigh any known risk. It is doubtful if preventing the availability of these products will significantly affect the role of analgesic abuse/overuse in end-stage renal disease. Better risk management would come from a focused educational program, developed in a close collaboration between industry, healthcare professionals and consumer organizations, such a program must warn against the potential dangers of analgesic and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug misuse.

A long-term prospective controlled study of analgesic abuse in Belgium

In 1991, Dubach et al clearly demonstrated an increased risk of renal morbidity and mortality after phenacetin abuse in middle aged working women. We investigated the renal effects of the abuse of several kinds of analgesics in abusers of different sex and age categories. A cohort of 200 active analgesic abusers (age range 21 to 86 years) and 200 matched controls was followed for seven years (1984 to 1992). Subjects were visited at home once a year for a short interview and a medical examination. Renal function showed a significant decrease over time in controls as well as in abusers (P < 0.001). The decrease was, however, significantly more pronounced in abusers (P < 0.001). The development of a decreased renal function was observed in 12 abusers and 2 controls resulting in a relative risk of 6.1 (95% CI: 1.4 to 25.9). Subjects showing a decreased renal function underwent a diagnostic investigation. Using validated diagnostic criteria, analgesic nephropathy could be established in 6 out of the 10 abusers who had a diagnostic workup, in the absence of any other form of renal disease.

High diagnostic performance of CT scan for analgesic nephropathy in patients with incipient to severe renal failure

Recently, well performing diagnostic criteria for analgesic nephropathy in end-stage renal failure (ESRF) patients were defined by the demonstration of a bilateral decrease in renal volume combined with either bumpy contours or papillary calcifications. In this study, the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) scan was compared to the previously used renal imaging techniques (sonography and conventional tomography). In a first study, a cohort of 40 analgesic abusers (defined as daily use of analgesic mixtures during at least 5 years) and 40 controls, all ESRF patients without a clear renal diagnosis, were investigated with sonography, tomography and CT scan without injection of iodinated contrast material, to search for the imaging signs of analgesic nephropathy. Using CT scan, sonography and tomography, renal size could be evaluated with comparable results while CT scan was superior in the detection of papillary calcifications (sensitivity 87%, specificity 97%). In a second controlled study of 53 analgesic abusers with a serum creatinine between 1.5 to 4 mg/dl in the absence of a clear renal diagnosis, a CT scan was performed and scored for the presence of decreased renal volume, bumpy contours and papillary calcifications. It was found that the renal image of analgesic nephropathy on CT scan in an early stage of renal failure is comparable with the observations made in ESRF patients. Particularly the demonstration of papillary calcifications showed a high sensitivity of 92% with a specificity of 100% for the early diagnosis of analgesic nephropathy.

Renal effects of over-the-counter analgesics

Recent case reports have shown that over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics, which are generally considered to be a safe treatment for minor aches and pains and fever, may cause adverse renal effects. Many renal syndromes induced by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be attributed to prostaglandin inhibition. Fluid and electrolyte disturbances, acute renal failure, and acute interstitial nephritis also occur predominantly with NSAIDs. Acetaminophen lacks significant peripheral prostaglandin inhibition and may be a preferred first-line agent, particularly in patients susceptible to the induction of renal impairment. Apart from obvious clinical overdosage situations, limited reports of adverse renal effects exist with acetaminophen. Some studies have reported an association between analgesic nephropathy, one of the most severe analgesic-related adverse renal effects, and long-term abuse of phenacetin, acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, analgesic combinations, or other NSAIDs, although for some of these agents, this relationship is controversial. The overall risk for serious renal effects with OTC analgesics appears to be low, but given the accessibility and vast number of persons taking these agents, the absolute number of patients affected may be substantial. Therefore, it is important that healthcare providers recognize the risk factors for adverse analgesic-related renal effects.

The Tromsø Study: frequency and predicting factors of analgesic drug use in a free-living population (12-56 years)

In a cross-sectional survey carried out in Tromsø in 1986-7, 19,137 men and women aged 12-56 years from the general population were asked about their use of drugs during the preceding 14 days. Use of analgesics was very common. On average 28% of the women and 13% of the men had used analgesics. Drug use due to menstruation discomfort contributed only partly to the gender difference. Drug use was independent of age from 20 years of age. Factors having an impact on analgesic drug use were analyzed by logistic regression. The most significant predictors of analgesic use were suffering from headache (OR = 14.2(women) OR = 24.4(men)) and infections (OR = 2.0(women) OR = 2.4(men)). Drug users also tended to suffer from symptoms of depression (women) and sleeplessness (men). Lifestyle and sociodemographic factors were also significant predictors, but were of marginal importance (OR < 1.5) compared with occurrence of pain and infections.

Caffeine potentiation of mefenamic acid-induced lesions in the rat renal medulla

The effect of caffeine given in combination with mefenamic acid on the renal medulla was examined. Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups and gavage fed either vehicle suspension (control), mefenamic acid, mefenamic acid+caffeine or caffeine only for 4 months. Renal tissue taken from the corticomedullary junction was processed for electron microscopy. Ultrathin sections were cut after identification of vasa rectae on survey sections. On subsequent morphometric analysis, percentage interstitial tissue was calculated from the total area of vasa recta less the non-interstitial tissue. The median percentage of interstitial tissue in the mefenamic acid and caffeine group was 41 (range 33-50; n = 15) compared with 34 (20-48; n = 20) in mefenamic acid (P less than 0.01), 29 (15-42; n = 15) in caffeine only (P less than 0.001) and 32 (20-46; n = 18) in vehicle-treated animals (P less than 0.001). There were no significant differences between mefenamic acid alone and vehicle or caffeine-only groups or between caffeine-only and vehicle-treated controls. This suggests that caffeine potentiates the effect of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, mefenamic acid, on the rat renal medulla, resulting in a quantitative increase in the interstitial tissue between adjacent afferent and efferent vasa recta.

Genotoxicity of analgesic compounds assessed by an in vitro micronucleus assay

Several analgesic compounds and mixtures of analgesics were examined for both cytotoxicity and ability to induce chromosomal damage in the normal rat-kidney cell line NRK-49F. Chromosomal damage was assessed using an in vitro micronucleus assay. Of all the compounds tested, only N-hydroxyparacetamol caused a high degree of cell death at the concentrations used. 4 analgesic compounds were found to be inducers of micronuclei in NRK cells; in order of decreasing potency these were: N-hydroxyparacetamol, N-hydroxyphenacetin, caffeine and paracetamol. An aspirin, phenacetin, caffeine mixture (APC) failed to induce micronuclei above the background level, and a paracetamol-codeine combination did not increase the level of micronuclei induction above that induced by paracetamol alone. This report suggests paracetamol and some related compounds are capable of inducing chromosomal damage in mammalian cells in vitro, which is consistent with recent reports of a possible paracetamol-DNA interaction.

Analgesic-associated nephropathy

Although the question of whether or not analgesic abuse leads to a certain type of nephropathy has been investigated since 1953, no conclusive answer has been forthcoming. Epidemiologic investigations on the correlation between analgesic abuse and renal function as well as experimental animal studies have given contradictory results concerning the possibility of analgesic-associated kidney damage. However, studies on the correlation between analgesic abuse and papillary necrosis have demonstrated that this lesion coincides in 69% of the cases with an analgesic history. Follow-up studies of patients with analgesic nephropathy have shown that renal function deteriorates in 60% of the patients with continued abuse and that it stabilizes in 80% of the patients after cessation of abuse. Studies on the legislative restriction of phenacetin/acetaminophen, carried out mostly in Scandinavian countries since 1965, show a 50%-90% decline in signs of analgesic nephropathy (papillary necrosis) following a reduction in the sale of these drugs. The prevalence of analgesic abuse may be underestimated, since up to 80% of the abusers tend to deny their analgesic intake. Obviously, only a small percentage of analgesic abusers (approximately 1%) finally develop nephropathy. Even though the results of epidemiologic and experimental studies are contradictory, the results of investigations on papillary necrosis and on legislative prevention as well as of patient follow-ups tend to indicate a correlation between analgesic abuse and a well-defined type of nephropathy.

Chemically induced renal papillary necrosis and upper urothelial carcinoma. Part 1

In the past, renal papillary necrosis (RPN) has been commonly associated with long-term abusive analgesic intake, but over recent years a wide variety of industrially and therapeutically used chemicals have been shown to induce this lesion experimentally or in man. Destruction of the renal papilla may result in: (1) secondary degenerative cortical changes which precede chronic renal failure or (2) a rapidly metastasizing upper urothelial carcinoma, which has a very poor prognosis. This article will briefly review the published data on the morphology, function, and biochemistry of the normal renal medulla and the pathology associated with RPN, together with the secondary changes which give rise to cortical degeneration or epithelial carcinoma. It will then examine in detail those chemicals which have been reported to cause RPN in an attempt to delineate structure-activity relationships. Finally, the many different theories that have been proposed to explain the pathophysiology of RPN will be examined and an hypothesis will be put forward to explain the primary pathogenesis of the lesion and its secondary consequences.

Chemically induced renal papillary necrosis and upper urothelial carcinoma. Part 2

In the past, renal papillary necrosis (RPN) has been commonly associated with long-term abusive analgesic intake, but over recent years a wide variety of industrially and therapeutically used chemicals have been shown to induce this lesion experimentally or in man. Destruction of the renal papilla may result in: (1) secondary degenerative cortical changes which precede chronic renal failure or (2) a rapidly metastasizing upper urothelial carcinoma, which has a very poor prognosis. This article will briefly review the published data on the morphology, function, and biochemistry of the normal renal medulla and the pathology associated with RPN, together with the secondary changes which give rise to cortical degeneration or epithelial carcinoma. It will then examine in detail those chemicals which have been reported to cause RPN in an attempt to delineate structure-activity relationships. Finally, the many different theories that have been proposed to explain the pathophysiology of RPN will be examined and an hypothesis will be put forward to explain the primary pathogenesis of the lesion and its secondary consequences.

Renal effects of antipyretic analgesics

Most antipyretic analgesics can cause acute nephrotoxic effects, including acute tubular necrosis, acute interstitial nephritis, glomerular toxicity, and functional changes, such as "salicyl edema," following large doses of sodium salicylate. Most functional changes are related to acute suppression of prostaglandin synthesis, "the acute prostaglandin-effect," and have been primarily noted with the use of indomethacin. The association between prolonged and excessive consumption of compound analgesics and the development of renal disease and renal failure, characterized by renal papillary necrosis, is now well established. Studies in several countries have shown that the incidence of analgesic nephropathy as an indication for dialysis and transplantation corresponds to the per capita consumption of phenacetin in compound analgesics. Analgesic nephropathy, which is part of a wider clinical syndrome, the analgesic syndrome, is uncommon following the use of single analgesics. Analgesic nephropathy and the analgesic syndrome are discussed in detail, including the development of uroepithelial tumors.

The contribution of genetically determined oxidation status to inter-individual variation in phenacetin disposition

The oxidative O-de-ethylation and aromatic 2-hydroxylation of phenacetin have been investigated in panels of extensive (EM, n = 13) and poor (PM, n = 10) metabolizers of debrisoquine. The EM group excreted in the urine significantly more paracetamol (EM: 40.8 +/- 14.9% dose/0-8 h; PM: 29.2 +/- 8.7% dose/0-8 h, 2P less than 0.05) and significantly less 2-hydroxylated metabolites (EM: 4.7 +/- 2.3% dose/0-8 h; PM: 9.7 +/- 3.5% dose/0-8 h, 2P less than 0.005) than the PM group. Apparent first-order rate constants, calculated from pooled phenotype data, for overall elimination of phenacetin (k) and formation of paracetamol (kml) were higher in the EM group (EM: k = 0.191 +/- 0.151 h-1; kml = 0.091 +/- 0.025 h-1; PM: k = 0.098 +/- 0.035 h-1, 2P less than 0.05, kml = 0.052 +/- 0.019 h-1, 2P less than 0.05) than the PM group. The apparent first-order rate constant for 2-hydroxylation displayed no significant inter-phenotype differences. Correlation analysis demonstrated that genetically determined oxidation status accounted for approximately 50% of the inter-individual variability in phenacetin disposition encountered in this study.

Analgesics and tobacco as risk factors for cancer of the ureter and renal pelvis

In a case-control study of 36 men with cancer of the ureter and 307 male controls with the same age distribution tobacco smoking conferred a relative risk for this cancer of 2.9, whereas consumption of analgesics of any kind did not increase the risk. The relative risk for cancer of the renal pelvis, determined for 29 men, was 2.4 for tobacco and 6.0 for phenacetin-containing analgesics. Analgesics containing no phenacetin conferred no increased risk for cancer at this site. Data for 13 women with ureteral cancer, 5 of whom had taken phenacetin, are presented but not analyzed.