Risk factors for renal allograft loss in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Recurrent Primary Disease: Two Main Obstacles in Abdominal Kidney, Liver, and Pancreas Transplants

The advances in acute phase care have firmly established the practice of organ transplantation in the last several decades. Then, the next issues that loom large in the field of transplantation include antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and recurrent primary disease. Acute ABMR is a daunting hurdle in the performance of organ transplantation. The recent progress in desensitization and preoperative monitoring of donor-specific antibodies enables us to increase positive outcomes. However, chronic active ABMR is one of the most significant problems we currently face. On the other hand, recurrent primary disease is problematic for many recipients. Notably, some recipients, unfortunately, lost their vital organs due to this recurrence. Although some progress has been achieved in these two areas, many other factors remain largely obscure. In this review, these two topics will be discussed in light of recent discoveries.

Transplant outcomes in kidney recipients with lupus nephritis, and systematic review

Background

Despite improved survival of patients with lupus nephritis (LN), some require kidney transplantation because of progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the transplant outcomes of these patients and other recipients have not been thoroughly compared.

Methods

In total, 1848 Korean kidney recipients who underwent transplantation from 1998 to 2017 at two tertiary referral centers were evaluated retrospectively. Among them, 28 recipients with LN, and 50 control recipients matched by age, sex, and donor type, were compared with respect to graft and patient survival. We pooled our data with 17 previous cohort studies in which the graft survival of recipients with LN was described in detail.

Results

During the median follow-up period of 9.5 years (maximum 21 years), graft failure (GF) occurred in 10.7% and 16.0% of LN and control recipients, respectively. No differences were found in the rates of GF and death-censored graft failure or patient survival between the two groups. The risks of acute T cell-mediated and antibody-mediated rejection were also similar between the two groups. The pooled analysis showed similar 1- and 5-year graft survival rates between LN and control recipients.

Conclusions

Kidney transplantation is an acceptable option in patients with concurrent LN and ESRD.

Recurrence of disease following organ transplantation in autoimmune liver disease and systemic lupus erythematosus

Disease recurrence after organ transplantation associated with graft failure is a major clinical challenge in autoimmune diseases. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) are the three most common (autoimmune liver diseases) ALD for which liver transplantation (LT) is the most effective treatment option for patients with end-stage diseases. Although the 5- and 10-year survival rates of post-LT patients are remarkable (80-84% and 71-79% in PBC, 73-87% and 58-83% in PSC, 76-79% and 67-77% respectively in AIH patients), post-LT disease recurrence is not uncommon. Here, we summarize literature findings on disease recurrence of these ALD with emphasis on the incidence, risk factors and impact on long-term outcome. We noted that the incidence of disease recurrence varies between studies, which ranges from 53% to 10.9% in PBC, 8.2% to 44.7% in PSC and 7% to 42% in AIH. The variations are likely due to differences in study design, such as sample size, duration of studies and follow up time. This is further compounded by the lack of precise clinical diagnosis criteria and biomarkers of disease recurrence in these ALD, variation in post-LT treatment protocols to prevent disease recurrence and a multitude of risk factors associated with these ALD. While recurrence of PBC and AIH does not significantly impact long term outcome including overall survival, recurrent PSC patients often require another LT. Renal transplantation, like LT, is the treatment of choice in patients with end-stage lupus nephritis. While calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and immunosuppressive drugs have improved the survival rate, post-transplant recurrence of lupus nephritis from surveillance-biopsy proven lupus nephritis range from 30% to 44%. On the other hand, recurrence of post-transplant lupus nephritis from registry survey analysis were only 1.1% to 2.4%. In general, risk factors associated with an increased frequency of post-transplant recurrence of autoimmune diseases are not clearly defined. Large scale multi-center studies are needed to further define guidelines for the diagnosis and clinical management to minimize disease recurrence and improve outcomes of post-transplant patients.

Renal transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus: Comparison of graft survival with other causes of end-stage renal disease

INTRODUCTION

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in 10%-30% of patients. Initially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was a contraindication for kidney transplantation (KT). Today, long-term graft survival remains controversial. Our objective was to compare the survival after KT in patients with SLE or other causes of ESRD.

METHODS

All SLE patients who had undergone KT in a retrospective cohort were included. Renal graft survival was compared with that of 50 controls, matched for age, sex, and year of transplantation. Survival was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier test and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Twenty-five subjects with SLE were included. The estimated 1-year, 2- and 5-year survival rates for patients with SLE were 92%, 66% and 66%. Renal graft survival did not differ between patients with SLE and other causes of ESRD (P=.39). The multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in graft survival between the two groups (hazard ratio, HR=1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-6.61, P=.28). The recurrence rate of LN was 8% and was not associated with graft loss. Acute rejection was the only variable associated with graft loss in patients with SLE (HR=16.5, 95% CI 1.94-140.1, P=.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal graft survival in SLE patients did not differ from that reported for other causes of ESRD.

Recent advances in our understanding of recurrent primary glomerulonephritis after kidney transplantation

Recurrent glomerulonephritis (GN) is an important cause of kidney allograft failure, particularly in younger recipients. Approximately 15% of death-censored graft failures are due to recurrent GN, but this incidence is likely an underestimation of the magnitude of the problem. Overall, 18% to 22% of kidney allografts are lost due to GN, either recurrent or presumed de novo. The impact of recurrent GN on allograft survival was recognized from the earliest times in kidney transplantation. However, progress in this area has been slow, and our understanding of GN recurrence remains limited, in large part due to incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases. This review focuses on recent advances in our general understanding of the pathophysiology of primary GN, the risk of recurrence in the allograft, and the consequences for kidney graft survival. We focus specifically on the most common forms of primary GN, including focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and IgA nephropathy. New understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases has had direct clinical implications for transplantation, allowing better identification of candidates at high risk of recurrence and earlier diagnoses, and it is expected to lead to significance improvements in the therapy and perhaps even prevention of GN recurrence. More than ever, it is essential to fully characterize GN before transplantation as this information will direct our management posttransplantation. Further, the relative rarity of recurrent GN dictates the need for multicenter studies in order to evaluate, test, and validate recent advances and therapies.

Kidney transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Despite improvements in overall prognosis in lupus nephritis, 10%-30% of patients with proliferative renal involvement progress to end stage renal disease, according to the severity of the disease and associated socioeconomic factors. Kidney transplantation has been recognized as the most appropriate treatment for those patients, but several issues remain after renal function restoration in a lupus recipient. Among these are the fear of lupus nephritis recurrence in the graft, the choice of immunosuppressive therapy in cases of recurrent lupus for a patient who has already received a toxic and prolonged immunosuppressive course, and finally, the management of comorbidities to reduce associated morbidities in the long term. All the above topics are examined in this review, with the hope of providing a clear picture of data as illustrated in the current literature.

Lupus nephritis and end-stage kidney disease

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem disease affecting many organs. Varying degrees of renal involvement are seen in up to 60% of adults with SLE, and severe lupus nephritis (LN) (World Health Organization class III and above) progresses to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within 15 years of diagnosis in 10% to 30% of patients. In fact, renal injury is the most important predictor of mortality in patients with SLE. Identifying patients at risk of progression to ESKD and providing them with aggressive and appropriate immunosuppressive therapy are important factors that affect the morbidity and mortality of LN patients. Management of LN-related ESKD requires attention to persistent activity of SLE and need for continuous immunosuppressive treatment because a decrease in SLE activity in this population can improve their outcome.

[Kidney allograft: a target for systemic disease]

Recurrence of disease after transplantation is frequent and represents the third cause of allograft loss. Recurrence of lupus nephritis after transplantation is rare. Kidney transplantation in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome or lupus anticoagulant is challenging due to the high risk of immediate post-transplant thrombosis and bleeding risk associated to the subsequent anticoagulation. Moreover, vascular changes associated to the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies negatively impact allograft rate survival. Recurrence of pauci immune glomerulonephritis or Goodpasture syndrome is exceptional.

Renal transplantation in lupus nephritis: a Brazilian cohort

OBJECTIVE

To determine the epidemiological profile and outcome of patients with lupus nephritis (LN) undergoing renal transplantation.

METHODS

The archival records of 50 patients with LN and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) treated by kidney transplantation from March 1992 to December 2010 were reviewed. All patients met the American College of Rheumatology criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were included in the study. The majority were women (85.7%) and non-Caucasian (85.7%); the mean age at diagnosis of SLE and LN was 24 ± 8 and 25 ± 8 years, respectively. Renal biopsy was performed in 12 patients, with 75% of them showing proliferative lesions (class III and IV according to the World Health Organization and International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society classification). Thirteen patients (93%) underwent intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis before transplantation. The median time between the start of dialysis and transplantation was 30 months (range 3-103 months); 67% of the procedures involved deceased donors and 33% involved living-related donors. The graft survival rates were 93.3%, 90.9%, and 85.7% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Post-transplant immunosuppressive agents were mycophenolate mofetil (84%), azathioprine (17%), tacrolimus (25%), sirolimus (58%) and cyclosporine (8%). Eight episodes of acute rejection were noted in six patients. There was a graft loss due to renal vein thrombosis in the one patient with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome. The mean SLICC by the time of kidney transplantation was 5 ± 2. In total, 13 patients (92.8%) developed at least one infectious event during the follow-up, with one dying in the immediate post-transplant period because of sepsis. Two patients (14%) had a lupus flare. There was no clinical or histological evidence of LN recurrence.

CONCLUSION

LN is the major cause of morbidity in SLE, with progression to ESRD in 10-22% of cases. Despite concerns about LN recurrence after renal transplantation, the data obtained in our sample indicate this procedure as a safe alternative therapy for ESRD in this population.

Recurrence of secondary glomerular disease after renal transplantation

The risk of a posttransplant recurrence of secondary glomerulonephritis (GN) is quite variable. Histologic recurrence is frequent in lupus nephritis, but the lesions are rarely severe and usually do not impair the long-term graft outcome. Patients with Henoch-Schonlein nephritis have graft survival similar to that of other renal diseases, although recurrent Henoch-Schonlein nephritis with extensive crescents has a poor prognosis. Amyloid light-chain amyloidosis recurs frequently in renal allografts but it rarely causes graft failure. Amyloidosis secondary to chronic inflammation may also recur, but this is extremely rare in patients with Behcet's disease or in those with familial Mediterranean fever, when the latter are treated with colchicine. Double organ transplantation (liver/kidney; heart/kidney), chemotherapy, and autologous stem cell transplantation may be considered in particular cases of amyloidosis, such as hereditary amyloidosis or multiple myeloma. There is little experience with renal transplantation in light-chain deposition disease, fibrillary/immunotactoid GN, or mixed cryoglobulinemic nephritis but successful cases have been reported. Diabetic nephropathy often recurs but usually only after many years. Recurrence in patients with small vessel vasculitis is unpredictable but can cause graft failure. However, in spite of recurrence, patient and graft survival rates are similar in patients with small vessel vasculitis compared with those with other renal diseases. Many secondary forms of GN no longer represent a potential contraindication to renal transplantation. The main issues in transplantation of patients with secondary GN are the infectious, cardiovascular, or hepatic complications associated with the original disease or its treatment.

Recurrence of lupus nephritis after kidney transplantation

The frequency and outcome of recurrent lupus nephritis (RLN) among recipients of a kidney allograft vary among single-center reports. From the United Network for Organ Sharing files, we estimated the period prevalence and predictors of RLN in recipients who received a transplant between 1987 and 2006 and assessed the effects of RLN on allograft failure and recipients' survival. Among 6850 recipients of a kidney allograft with systemic lupus erythematosus, 167 recipients had RLN, 1770 experienced rejection, and 4913 control subjects did not experience rejection. The period prevalence of RLN was 2.44%. Non-Hispanic black race, female gender, and age <33 years each independently increased the odds of RLN. Graft failure occurred in 156 (93%) of those with RLN, 1517 (86%) of those with rejection, and 923 (19%) of control subjects without rejection. Although recipients with RLN had a fourfold greater risk for graft failure compared with control subjects without rejection, only 7% of graft failure episodes were attributable to RLN compared and 43% to rejection. During follow-up, 867 (13%) recipients died: 27 (16%) in the RLN group, 313 (18%) in the rejection group, and 527 (11%) in the control group. In summary, severe RLN is uncommon in recipients of a kidney allograft, but black recipients, female recipient, and younger recipients are at increased risk. Although RLN significantly increases the risk for graft failure, it contributes far less than rejection to its overall incidence; therefore, these findings should not keep patients with lupus from seeking a kidney transplant.

Risk factors and impact of recurrent lupus nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus undergoing renal transplantation: data from a single US institution

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for recurrent lupus nephritis, allograft loss, and survival among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) undergoing kidney transplantation.

METHODS

The archival records of all kidney transplant recipients with a prior diagnosis of SLE (according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria) from June 1977 to June 2007 were reviewed. Patients who had died or lost the allograft within 90 days of engraftment were excluded. Time-to-event data were examined by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty of nearly 7,000 renal transplantations were performed in 202 SLE patients during the 30-year interval. Of the 177 patients who met the criteria for study entry, the majority were women (80%) and African American (65%), the mean age was 35.6 years, and the mean disease duration was 11.2 years. Recurrent lupus nephritis was noted in 20 patients (11%), allograft loss in 69 patients (39%), and death in 36 patients (20%). African American ethnicity was found to be associated with a shorter time-to-event for recurrent lupus nephritis (hazard ratio [HR] 4.63, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.29-16.65) and death (HR 2.47, 95% CI 0.91-6.71), although, with the latter, the association was not statistically significant. Recurrent lupus nephritis and chronic rejection of the kidney transplant were found to be risk factors for allograft loss (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.09-5.60 and HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.55-4.78, respectively). In patients with recurrent lupus nephritis, the lesion in the engrafted kidney was predominantly mesangial, compared with a predominance of proliferative or membranous lesions in the native kidneys.

CONCLUSION

African American ethnicity was independently associated with recurrent lupus nephritis. Allograft loss was associated with chronic transplant rejection and recurrence of lupus nephritis. Recurrent lupus nephritis is infrequent and relatively benign, without influence on a patient's survival.

Kidney transplantation in lupus patients: a case-control study from a single centre

This study was conducted to determine kidney transplantation (KTx) outcomes for Greek patients with renal failure caused by lupus nephritis (LN) compared with matched controls, kidney recipients with other causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Twenty-six patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) subjected to 26 kidney transplants were studied. For comparative purposes a case-control group was selected, matched for gender, source of donor, age and time of KTx. Patient and graft survival estimates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimator and survival estimates were compared with the log-rank test. All patients received cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil for chronic immunosuppression in addition to steroids. Fourteen transplants were from living-related donors and 12 were from deceased donors. The graft survival rates for lupus patients were 88% at 1 year, 67% at 5 years, 38% at 10 years, poorer than the control survival rates of 92%, 92% and 84% (P=0.004). Patient survival in the lupus group did not differ from that of the controls. Survival in the lupus group was 92% at 1 year, 77% at 5 years and 77% at 10 years vs. 96%, 92% and 92% (P=0.26). Chronic allograft nephropathy was the major cause of graft loss. Recurrent LN was detected in two patients, but only one lead to graft failure. SLE patients compared with controls had significantly higher rates of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, infections and malignancies. Compared with matched controls, SLE patients had inferior but still satisfactory graft survival rates, whereas patient survival rates were similar.

Systemic lupus erythematosus after renal transplantation: is complement a good marker for graft survival?

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation is considered a safe procedure for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the recurrence of disease and its impact on graft survival remains controversial.

METHODS

To analyze the presence of lupus serology activity during dialysis and its impact on lupus recurrence after transplantation, we performed a retrospective analysis of 23 lupus patients who received 26 kidney transplantations.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients received 26 renal transplantations from 1984 to 2003. Twelve patients presented pretransplant lupus activity (low complement and ANA > 1/40), without correlation with length of dialysis, but associated with proliferative glomerulonephritis (class IV) pretransplant. Among 26 grafts, 6 were lost in the first 6 months posttransplant. Among the remaining 20 functioning grafts, low complement activity occurred in 8, being associated with recurrence of immune deposits in 3 cases. Analysis of lupus activity showed that only one patient with a normal complement level posttransplant presented SLEDAI > 4, associated with persistent proteinuria and a graft biopsy without immune deposits. Graft survival was reduced in the presence of low complement posttransplantation.

CONCLUSION

Low complement levels after renal transplantation, in association with proteinuria may be considered to be a risk factor for recurrence of immune deposits, with a negative impact on graft survival.

Outcomes of renal transplantation for recipients with lupus nephritis: analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database

Prior analyses of transplant outcomes in lupus transplant recipients have not consisted of multivariate analyses in the modern immunosuppressive era. Here, we compared patient and graft outcomes in lupus and non-lupus recipients transplanted between 1996 to 2000 using the United Network of Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement Transplant Network database. We evaluated the impact of recipient and donor demographic factors, time on dialysis and the initial immunosuppression regimen on rejection rates and transplant outcomes. Univariate analysis showed similar graft but better patient survival rates for primary lupus and non-lupus transplant recipients (5-year patient survival rates for lupus cohort 85.2% for deceased donor transplants and 92.1% for living donor transplants as opposed to 82.1% and 89.8% respectively for the non-lupus cohort; P=0.05 and 0.03) but similar patient survival rates for deceased donor retransplant patients. After controlling for confounding factors, no differences in patient or graft survival were seen between the two groups. No difference in acute rejection rates were observed in deceased donor transplants, but there was a small but significant increase in the risk of acute rejection in living donor lupus transplant recipients (hazard ratio=1.19, P=0.05). Risk of graft failure was lower for deceased donor recipients receiving MMF (five-year graft loss rate=29.6% for MMF vs. 40.2% for those not receiving MMF, P<0.0001), but no differences were seen among living donor recipients. Outcomes were similar regardless of type of calcineurin inhibitor, induction therapy, and time on dialysis. We conclude that lupus transplant recipients have outcomes generally equivalent to non-lupus transplant recipients.

The long-term prognosis of renal transplantation in patients with lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Few data are available about the long-term outcome of renal transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Between June 1982 and 2004, a total of 33 adults with lupus nephritis received 35 kidney allografts. Outcomes of these grafts and those of 70 controls matched for age, sex, and donor source who underwent transplantation during the same period were compared.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up after renal transplantation was 91 +/- 59 months for patients with lupus and 90 +/- 64 months for controls. Actuarial 15-year patient (80% versus 83%) and death-censored graft survival rates (69% versus 67%) were not significantly different between patients with lupus and controls. Risks for acute and chronic rejection, arterial hypertension, and infection were not different between the 2 groups. Mean serum creatinine levels also were similar in the 2 groups at the last follow-up visit. Intravascular thrombotic events occurred in 9 patients with SLE (26%) and 6 controls (8.6%; P = 0.038). In the SLE group, 6 of 7 antiphospholipid (aPL) antibody-positive versus 3 of 17 aPL antibody-negative patients experienced thrombotic events ( P = 0.015). Recurrence of lupus nephritis was documented in 3 renal grafts (8.6%), but no graft was lost because of recurrent lupus nephritis.

CONCLUSION

Long-term patient and graft survival probabilities were similar in patients with SLE and matched controls. The risk for thrombotic complications was greater in patients with SLE, particularly aPL-positive patients. Nephritis recurred in less than 10% of patients with SLE and did not influence graft survival.

Renal transplantation in lupus nephritis

Most patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are suitable candidates for renal transplantation. However, a number of them may present some disease-related problems. As cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in SLE patients, a careful pretransplant cardiovascular screening is recommended. A search for antiphospholipid antibodies is also useful as the presence of these antibodies can cause an early graft thrombosis. The risk of recurrence of SLE nephritis after transplantation may range between 2 and 30%. In most cases recurrence is characterized by mild histologic lesions. Only rarely does it lead to graft failure. Postransplant immunosuppression does not differ from that used routinely. Whenever possible, a steroid-free immunosuppression should be scheduled to prevent iatrogenic toxicity in patients who have already received long-term steroid treatment. The results of kidney transplantation largely depend on the clinical conditions at transplantation. In patients with poor clinical status or receiving an aggressive immunosuppression it is advisable to postpone the transplant. When some selection criteria are respected, the results of renal trasplantation in SLE patients are at least as good as in other transplant recipients.

Recurrent lupus nephritis in renal transplant recipients revisited: it is not rare

BACKGROUND

Although recurrent lupus nephritis (RLN) after kidney transplantation is reported to be rare (1%-4%), recent studies suggest a higher incidence. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of RLN in a large cohort of renal transplant recipients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

The records of 54 renal transplant recipients with SLE were reviewed. Thirty-one patients underwent biopsy because of worsening renal function and proteinuria. All biopsy specimens were evaluated by light microscopy, immunofluorescence (IF), and electron microscopy (EM).

RESULTS

Among the 50 patients with at least 3 months of follow-up, RLN was present in 15 (52% of patients who underwent biopsy, 30% of total patients): mesangial lupus nephritis (LN) (class II) in eight, focal proliferative LN (class III) in four, and membranous LN (class Vb) in three patients. One patient had graft loss because of RLN (class II) at 10.5 years. The duration of dialysis before transplantation was not different between patients with RLN compared to patients without RLN (P=0.40). Overall patient survival (n=50) was 96% at 1 year and 82% at 5 years, and graft survival was 87% at 1 year and 60% at 5 years. Graft survival was worse in patients who underwent biopsy compared with patients who never underwent biopsy (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

RLN is more common than previously reported, but in our series, graft loss because of RLN was rare. Aggressive use of allograft biopsies and morphologic evaluation with IF and EM are important factors in the diagnosis of RLN. The impact of new immunosuppressive agents on the incidence of RLN remains to be seen.

Pregnancy outcomes in female renal recipients: a comparison of systemic lupus erythematosus with other diagnoses

This study compares pregnancy outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients post renal transplant with recipients with other primary diagnoses, utilizing data from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry, Philadelphia, PA. Recipients were referred from transplant centers nationwide. A retrospective analysis was performed using data from questionnaires, hospital records and telephone interviews. Outcomes of pregnancies post renal transplant secondary to lupus nephritis (SLE: n = 38; 60 pregnancies) were compared with the pregnancy outcomes of renal recipients with other diagnoses (non-SLE: n = 247; 374 pregnancies). Drug-treated hypertension during pregnancy was less common in the SLE group than in the non-SLE group (45.0% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.015). There were fewer cesarean sections in the SLE group (30.2 vs. 53.2%, p = 0.008). There was no primary or gestational diabetes in the SLE group. There were no other statistical differences in maternal conditions or pregnancy outcomes between the SLE and non-SLE groups, or in the incidence of post pregnancy graft loss. Female recipients transplanted for renal failure secondary to lupus nephritis can successfully maintain pregnancy. Outcomes are comparable to renal recipients with other diagnoses. Newborns in both groups were often premature and had low birthweight. Overall childhood health was reported to be good; there were no apparent predominant structural malformations among the children.

Outcome after transplantation of young patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a report of the North American pediatric renal transplant cooperative study

BACKGROUND

The risk of progressing to end-stage renal disease in children with lupus glomerulonephritis is 18% to 50%. Published reports of transplantation secondary to end-stage renal failure in adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) demonstrate equivalent patient and graft survival. The purpose of this analysis is to compare patient and graft outcomes of pediatric SLE renal transplant recipients with an age-, race-, and gender-matched control group.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study (NAPRTCS) database identified 100 renal transplants performed in 94 young SLE patients. A control group of 470 children having received 501 renal transplants was identified.

RESULTS

The SLE cohort was primarily female (82%), non-Caucasian (61%), adolescents and differed from the control group in being less likely to be preemptively transplanted, in receiving longer pretransplant dialysis, and in being likely to have received more than five pretransplant transfusions. After transplantation, there were no differences seen in patient survival at 3 years (89% vs. 95%, SLE vs. control) or in overall graft failure rates (31% vs. 29%, SLE vs. control). There was a trend toward poorer graft survival in non-white SLE patients receiving living donor grafts compared with white SLE patients. An increased graft failure rate was seen among those SLE cadaveric transplant recipients receiving peritoneal dialysis before transplant compared with controls and compared with SLE patients receiving hemodialysis. No differences were seen in rates of acute tubular necrosis or overall acute rejection incidence, although there was a significant increase in the percentage of living donor SLE patients who experienced greater than four rejection episodes. There were nonsignificant trends toward increased graft loss due to patient death with a functioning graft as well as increased mortality secondary to infection in the SLE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of renal transplantation in young SLE patients are comparable to those seen in an age-, race- and gender-matched control group. The similar patient and graft survival is seen despite the SLE patients having an underlying disease with multiorgan involvement and despite receiving immunosuppression for potentially prolonged periods before transplantation. No outcome differences were seen except for an unexplained increase in the incidence of recurrent rejections (> or =4) in the living donor SLE patients as well as increased graft failure rate in those patients receiving cadaveric renal transplants after a period of peritoneal dialysis. The nonsignificant trends toward increased graft failures in non-white SLE patients receiving living donor grafts, increased graft loss secondary to death with a functioning graft, as well as the increased mortality due to infection deserve recognition and further study.

Outcomes of renal transplantation among patients with end-stage renal disease caused by lupus nephritis

BACKGROUND

Although the outcomes of renal transplantation among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) caused by lupus nephritis have generally been found to be comparable to those of patients with other causes of ESRD, some studies indicate that cadaveric graft failure is more common among these patients. However, most previous studies examined small numbers of patients and did not adjust for important confounding factors.

METHODS

Graft failure and patient mortality after the first cadaveric renal transplantation were compared between 772 adults with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis and 32,644 adults with ESRD caused by other causes who received a transplant between 1987 and 1994 and were included in the United States Renal Data System. The median follow-up times were 4.9 and 5.0 years in the two groups, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to adjust the risks of graft failure and mortality for group differences in recipient and donor characteristics. Similar comparisons were performed between 390 adults with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis and 10,512 adults with ESRD caused by other causes after first living-related renal transplantation.

RESULTS

In an unadjusted analysis, the risk of graft failure after first cadaveric transplant was slightly but significantly greater among patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis than among those with ESRD caused by other causes [hazard ratio (HR), 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1. 26, P = 0.04]. However, after adjustment for potential confounding factors, the risk of graft failure was not increased in patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.23, P = 0.28). Mortality after the first cadaveric transplantation did not differ between groups. The adjusted risks of graft failure (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.32, P = 0.62) and patient mortality (HR = 0. 69; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.05, P = 0.09) after the first living-related renal transplant were also not significantly higher among patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft and patient survival after first cadaveric and first living-related renal transplants are similar in patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis and patients with ESRD from other causes.

Access to renal transplantation among patients with end-stage renal disease due to lupus nephritis

Access to living related renal and cadaveric renal transplantation was compared between 5,863 adults with incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) caused by lupus nephritis and 463,141 adults with other causes of ESRD who were included in the US Renal Data System from 1987 to 1995. Using Cox regression models that adjusted for differences in age, sex, race, region of residence, and year of onset of ESRD, patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis were as likely as patients with other causes of ESRD to receive a living related renal transplant (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93 to 1.10; P = 0.70) but were 20% less likely to receive a cadaveric renal transplant (adjusted HR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75 to 0.85; P < 0.0001). Patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis were significantly more likely to be entered onto a waiting list for cadaveric renal transplantation (adjusted HR = 1. 15; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.21; P < 0.0001) but were less likely to receive a cadaveric transplant once entered onto a waiting list (adjusted HR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.78; P < 0.0001). Patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis had equal access to living related renal transplantation and greater enrollment on waiting lists for cadaveric transplantation than patients with ESRD from other causes, indicating that medical ineligibility is not a major barrier to transplantation. Both medical and nonmedical factors may contribute to the decreased likelihood of cadaveric transplantation among patients with ESRD caused by lupus nephritis.

Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. A study of 180 patients from a single center

Charts of 180 patients (147 women, 33 men) with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) complicated by renal involvement were retrospectively analyzed from a series of 436 patients. Mean age at renal disease onset was 27 years. Thirty-six percent of the patients had renal involvement after diagnosis of lupus, for 30.7% of that group it was more than 5 years later. Renal involvement occurred more frequently in young male patients of non-French non-white origin. Patients with renal involvement suffered more commonly from malar rash, psychosis, myocarditis, pericarditis, lymphadenopathy, and hypertension. Anemia, low serum complement, and raised anti-dsDNA antibodies were more frequent. According to the 1982 World Health Organization classification, histologic examination of initial renal biopsy specimen in 158 patients showed normal kidney in 1.5% of cases, mesangial in 22%, focal proliferative in 22%, diffuse proliferative in 27%, membranous in 20%, chronic sclerosing glomerulonephritis in 1%, and other forms of nephritis in 6.5%. Distribution of initial glomerulonephritis patterns was similar whether renal involvement occurred before or after the diagnosis of lupus. Transformation from 1 histologic pattern to another was observed in more than half of the analyzable patients (those who underwent at least 2 renal biopsies). Nephritis evolved toward end-stage renal disease in 14 patients despite the combined use of steroids and cyclophosphamide in 12. Initial elevated serum creatinine levels, initial hypertension, non-French non-white origin, and proliferative lesions on the initial renal biopsy were indicators of poor renal outcome. Twenty-four patients died after a mean follow-up of 109 months from SLE diagnosis. Among our 436 patients, the 10-year survival rate was not significantly affected by the presence or absence of renal involvement at diagnosis (89% and 92%, respectively).

End-stage renal disease in lupus: disease activity, dialysis, and the outcome of transplantation

Lupus nephritis remains a major cause of morbidity in SLE. Approximately 10% of patients with SLE develop end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In most SLE patients, disease activity diminishes as ESRD approaches. Consequently, the survival of SLE patients on dialysis (both hemo- and peritoneal) appears to be comparable to that of non-SLE patients. However, the role of antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies in causing dialysis-related morbidity among patients with SLE requires further investigation. In contrast to the outcomes of dialysis, recent evidence suggests that renal transplantation outcomes among SLE patients are inferior to those of non-SLE patients, primarily because of the risk of recurrent lupus nephritis in the allograft and the effect of aPL-related events on transplantation outcomes. Future avenues of investigation should be directed at developing better strategies to manage and prevent these complications.

Long-term outcome of kidney transplantation in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a multicenter study. Groupe Cooperatif de Transplantation d'île de France

BACKGROUND

The outcome of 60 renal transplantations in 53 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because of lupus nephritis was studied retrospectively and compared with 106 controls matched for age, sex, maximum panel-reactive antibody (PRA) level, and date of transplantation.

METHODS

The patients received their transplants over a 260-month period (21.5 years) between October 1971 and August 1993. The population was predominantly women (90%), and the mean age at the time of the transplantation was 33.2 years (range: 21-54 years). Fifty-six transplants (93%) were from cadaveric donors, and 4 (7%) were from living-related donors; 46 patients (86%) had primary allografts, and 7 (14%) received a second allograft. The duration of disease before transplantation was 93.6+/-6.2 months, and the duration of dialysis before transplantation was 48+/-6 months.

RESULTS

No patient had clinically active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) at the time of transplantation. The 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 83% and 98%, and the 5-year graft and patient survival rates were 69% and 96%. Actuarial graft and patient survival rates in SLE patients were not significantly different from those of the matched control group. Chronic rejection was the major risk factor for graft loss. Lupus nephritis recurred in the graft of one patient 3 months after transplantation, and there were extrarenal manifestations of SLE in four others.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirms that patients with SLE can receive transplants with excellent graft and patient survival rates and a low rate of clinical recurrent lupus nephritis.

Outcome of renal transplantation in ninety-seven cyclosporine-era patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and matched controls

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of renal transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A total of 97 SLE patients who underwent renal transplantation between January 1984 and September 1996 were selected for study and were matched with a group of non-SLE controls (1 control for each SLE patient) who also received transplants during that period. SLE patients and controls were matched on 6 covariates: age, sex, race, type of allograft (cadaveric versus living-related), number of previous transplants, and year of transplantation. All study subjects received either cyclosporine or FK-506/tacrolimus as part of their immunosuppressive regimen. In a rigorous medical records review, the status of each allograft and the cause of each graft loss was determined. Using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, the transplantation outcomes of the SLE patients were compared with those of the controls. The effects of 9 individual variables on transplantation outcomes were also examined, and the statistically significant variables were compared in a stratified, multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The control group included patients with 20 different causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The mean followup times for the SLE patients and controls were 323 weeks and 320 weeks, respectively. During the followup period, 52 SLE patients and 37 controls lost their allografts. The 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year allograft survival probabilities for the 2 groups (SLE versus controls) were as follows: 81.7% versus 88.2% (1-year); 74.7% versus 84.4% (2-year); 45.9% versus 75.0% (5-year); and 18.5% versus 34.8% (10-year). In the multivariate model, the relative hazard of allograft loss associated with SLE as the cause of ESRD was 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.06-4.06, P = 0.0328). The total number of HLA mismatches, smoking status, and delayed allograft function were also associated with allograft loss in the multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

Compared with matched controls, renal transplant patients with SLE had inferior transplantation outcomes, with more than twice the risk of allograft loss.

Frequency of recurrent lupus nephritis among ninety-seven renal transplant patients during the cyclosporine era

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of recurrent lupus nephritis (LN) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who underwent renal transplantation.

METHODS

We reviewed the posttransplant clinical course and renal biopsy results in 97 consecutive SLE patients who underwent a total of 106 renal transplantation procedures at our center from January 1984 to September 1996.

RESULTS

There were 81 female and 16 male patients, with a mean age of 35 years. Mean duration of dialysis prior to transplantation was 33.5 months; 9 patients were never dialyzed. In all patients, the disease was clinically and serologically quiescent at the time of transplantation. The mean posttransplantation followup period was 62.6 months. Patients underwent a total of 143 posttransplant biopsies. Nine patients had pathologic evidence of recurrent LN. Six of the patients with recurrence had cadaveric grafts, 2 had living-related grafts, and 1 had a living-unrelated graft. Recurrence occurred an average of 3.1 years after transplantation; the longest interval was 9.3 years and the shortest, 5 days. Histopathologic diagnoses on recurrence included diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis, focal proliferative glomerulonephritis, membranous glomerulonephritis, and mesangial glomerulonephritis. In 4 patients, recurrent LN contributed to graft loss. Three of the patients with recurrence had serologic evidence of active lupus, but only 1 had symptoms of active lupus (arthritis). Three patients who lost their grafts secondary to recurrent LN underwent second renal transplantation procedures and had functioning grafts at 7, 30, and 35 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In the largest single medical center series of renal transplant patients with SLE, recurrent LN was more common than reported in the literature, but was not always associated with allograft loss. Recurrent LN was often present in the absence of clinical and serologic evidence of active SLE.

Outcome of renal transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

(1) To provide an overview of the world's experience with renal transplantation in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to consider the most important studies in detail. (2) To examine four specific questions raised by the review, including (a) the frequency of recurrent lupus glomerulonephritis (GN); (b) the effect of pretransplantation dialysis on transplantation outcome; (c) the method of monitoring lupus activity in transplant patients; and (d) the frequency of early graft loss among lupus patients.

METHODS

We performed a MEDLINE search of the world's literature from 1975 to 1997 on the subject of renal transplantation in SLE, using the search terms "lupus," "SLE," "kidney," "renal transplantation," and "outcome." We included in this review 20 original reports that devoted significant attention to the outcome of renal transplantation among patients with lupus.

RESULTS

Of the nine studies that compared the transplantation outcomes of lupus patients with those of transplant patients with other causes of end-stage renal disease, the allograft survival rates were superior in the comparison groups in six, and approximately equivalent in three. The 1-year allograft survival rate of lupus patients with cadaveric renal transplants (CRTs) was 67% in the largest multicenter study, significantly lower than the rate for the other 14 diseases examined (77%; P = .009). In most studies, the lupus groups were significantly younger than their comparison groups, but they frequently included larger percentages of black patients. Lupus patients who received living-related renal transplants (LRRTs) generally had superior graft survival rates compared with those who received CRTs. In the largest single-center report, the 5-year graft survival rate in the cyclosporine era was 89% for LRRTs, compared with 41% for CRTs. Recurrence of lupus nephritis in the allograft is relatively rare, approximately 2%; this estimate is probably low. However, recurrent lupus glomerular nephritis (GN) did not invariably result in allograft failure. Short length of pretransplantation dialysis (i.e., less than 6 months) had no adverse effect on transplantation outcome in 10 of 11 studies that examined the relationship. Pretransplantation serological parameters, such as complement and anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels, appear to be unreliable predictors of the likelihood of recurrence, and also may be inaccurate measures of disease activity in the posttransplantation period. Finally, 9 of the 20 studies reviewed noted an increased risk of early graft loss among lupus transplant patients, possibly because of an increased frequency of acute injection reactions and thrombotic events associated with antiphospholipid antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that many lupus patients have excellent renal transplantation outcomes, substantial evidence indicates that renal transplant patients with lupus do not fare as well as patients with other causes of end-stage renal disease. Lupus patients may be particularly susceptible to adverse events occurring in the first year after transplantation. Further investigation is needed to improve renal transplantation outcomes for patients with lupus.