A novel simple hemoglobin dilution technique to measure hemodialysis vascular access flow

Effects of hemodialysis access surveillance on reducing risk of hemodialysis access thrombosis: A meta-analysis of randomized studies

INTRODUCTION

Vascular access thrombosis remains the Achilles Heel for many a hemodialysis patient. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of monitoring vascular access blood flow on prediction and prevention of vascular access thrombosis. We hypothesized that monitoring vascular access blood flow has a pivotal role in lowering the risk of thrombosis and subsequent access failure.

METHODOLOGY

We conducted a systematic review in PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify randomized studies that have assessed the effect of hemodialysis access surveillance on the risk of thrombosis. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed among patients with arterio-venous fistula (AV-fistulas) and those with arterio-venous graft (AV-grafts).

RESULTS

Ten randomized studies were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of patients included in the analysis was 1430. On performing the random-effects model among the included studies, hemodialysis access surveillance was associated with better outcomes (risk ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval ranges from 0.55 to 0.98). The analysis of the AV-fistula group showed an estimated overall risk ratio of 0.55 (95% confidence interval ranges from 0.33 to 0.89) favoring access surveillance. However, in the AV-grafts group, the estimated overall risk ratio was 0.92 (95% confidence interval ranges from 0.65 to 1.29) showing no additional benefit for access surveillance.

CONCLUSION

Hemodialysis access surveillance using access blood flow monitoring can reduce the risk of access thrombosis for patients with AV-fistulas, but this is not the case with AV-grafts.

Superior Survival Outcomes of a Polyethylene Glycol-20k Based Resuscitation Solution in a Preclinical Porcine Model of Lethal Hemorrhagic Shock

OBJECTIVE

To compare early outcomes and 24-hour survival after LVR with the novel polyethylene glycol-20k-based crystalloid (PEG-20k), WB, or hextend in a preclinical model of lethal HS.

BACKGROUND

Posttraumatic HS is a major cause of preventable death. Current resuscitation strategies focus on restoring oxygen-carrying capacity (OCC) and coagulation with blood products. Our lab shows that PEG-20k is an effective non-sanguineous, LVR solution in acute models of HS through mechanisms targeting cell swelling-induced microcirculatory failure.

METHODS

Male pigs underwent splenectomy followed by controlled hemorrhage until lactate reached 7.5-8.5 mmol/L. They were randomized to receive LVR with PEG-20k, WB, or Hextend. Surviving animals were recovered 4 hours post-LVR. Outcomes included 24-hour survival rates, mean arterial pressure, lactate, hemoglobin, and estimated intravascular volume changes.

RESULTS

Twenty-four-hour survival rates were 100%, 16.7%, and 0% in the PEG-20k, WB, and Hextend groups, respectively (P = 0.001). PEG-20k significantly restored mean arterial press, intravascular volume, and capillary perfusion to baseline, compared to other groups. This caused complete lactate clearance despite decreased OCC. Neurological function was normal after next-day recovery in PEG-20k resuscitated pigs.

CONCLUSION

Superior early and 24-hour outcomes were observed with PEG-20k LVR compared to WB and Hextend in a preclinical porcine model of lethal HS, despite decreased OCC from substantial volume-expansion. These findings demonstrate the importance of enhancing microcirculatory perfusion in early resuscitation strategies.

Spanish Clinical Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis

Vascular access for haemodialysis is key in renal patients both due to its associated morbidity and mortality and due to its impact on quality of life. The process, from the creation and maintenance of vascular access to the treatment of its complications, represents a challenge when it comes to decision-making, due to the complexity of the existing disease and the diversity of the specialities involved. With a view to finding a common approach, the Spanish Multidisciplinary Group on Vascular Access (GEMAV), which includes experts from the five scientific societies involved (nephrology [S.E.N.], vascular surgery [SEACV], vascular and interventional radiology [SERAM-SERVEI], infectious diseases [SEIMC] and nephrology nursing [SEDEN]), along with the methodological support of the Cochrane Center, has updated the Guidelines on Vascular Access for Haemodialysis, published in 2005. These guidelines maintain a similar structure, in that they review the evidence without compromising the educational aspects. However, on one hand, they provide an update to methodology development following the guidelines of the GRADE system in order to translate this systematic review of evidence into recommendations that facilitate decision-making in routine clinical practice, and, on the other hand, the guidelines establish quality indicators which make it possible to monitor the quality of healthcare.

Vascular Access Creation and Care--Perspective From India

India has one of the fastest growing economies in the world and is home to nearly one sixth of world's population. Chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension are common. Kidney disease is a known complication of these chronic diseases and is on the rise. Improving affordability with advanced care delivery has led to the increasing use of maintenance hemodialysis. Along with this hemodialysis comes the inevitable need for vascular access. Interventional nephrology in India is a fast-evolving discipline and promises to be a critical component of hemodialysis care in the future. This review provides a background on the current state of the CKD burden in India and the various vascular access options in use currently. In addition, we describe the experience of 2 centers in western and southern India in managing vascular access needs in hopes that they will serve as a model of the proliferation of vascular access care throughout India and in other developing countries.

The rise and fall of access blood flow surveillance in arteriovenous fistulas

Vascular access blood flow (Qa) surveillance has been described as a typical false paradigm, an example of how new tests are sometimes adopted even without good-quality evidence of their benefits. This may be true for grafts, but not necessarily for arteriovenous fistulas. We reviewed the literature on Qa surveillance in fistulas to see whether it complies with the World Health Organization's criteria for screening tests. Measuring Qa has a fairly good reproducibility. Qa shows an excellent-to-good accuracy for stenosis being the only bedside screening test that achieves a very high sensitivity while retaining a fair-to-good positive predictive value for Qa thresholds of 600 ml/minute or higher associated with a >25% drop in Qa, or findings suggesting stenosis on physical examination. The accuracy of Qa in predicting thrombosis is hard to establish because of the heterogeneity of published studies, though a Qa of 300 ml/minute seems the most reliable cutoff. Qa surveillance affords a significant 2- to 3-fold reduction in the risk of thrombosis by comparison with clinical monitoring alone when Qa criteria highly sensitive to stenosis are considered, regardless of the study design (randomized controlled trials, cohort studies with concurrent or historic controls). Using highly sensitive Qa screening criteria also halves the risk of access loss, although this effect is not statistically significant. Our analysis strongly suggests that Qa surveillance is an effective method for screening mature fistulas, though further, appropriately designed studies are needed to fully elucidate its benefits and cost effectiveness.

Validation of the measurement of haemodialysis access flow using a haemoglobin dilution test

Monitoring of blood flows in arteriovenous fistulae and arteriovenous grafts is recommended to predict access thrombosis. The ultrasound dilution technique (UDT) is the gold standard. We compare a recently described haemoglobin dilution technique (HDT) with the UDT in measurement of vascular access flow. Access blood flow was measured in 67 stable dialysis patients using HDT by bedside Hemocue (Hemocue AB, Ängelholm, Sweden) and laboratory measurement. Access blood flow was then measured by UDT in the same dialysis session. Median flow rate by UDT was 950 ml/min (IQR 490-1,440 ml/min), by Hemocue HDT 935 ml/min (IQR 475-1,395 ml/min, p = 0.534), and by laboratory haemoglobin HDT 920 ml/min (IQR 463-1,378 ml/min). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated poor agreement between UDT and HDT (limits of agreement for Hemocue HDT -22.7 to 20.1%, for laboratory HDT -21.2 to 20.4%). HDT can be used to measure vascular access flow but requires validation against clinical outcomes before being recommended as an alternative to UDT.