Alloreactive T cells and ‘the persistence of memory’

Detection of Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells With Cross-Reactivity Against Alloantigens: Potency and Flaws of Present Experimental Methods

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Virus-specific T cells have the intrinsic capacity to cross-react against allogeneic HLA antigens, a phenomenon known as heterologous immunity. In transplantation, these cells may contribute to the alloimmune response and negatively impact graft outcome. This study describes the various techniques that can be used to detect heterologous immune responses of virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells against allogeneic HLA antigens. The strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches are discussed and illustrated by experimental data.

Mesenchymal stromal cells to control donor-specific memory T cells in solid organ transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) represent a promising cell therapy to promote transplant tolerance, as they influence many cells involved in immune response. Herein, we review recent evidence on the ability of MSCs to inhibit antigen-induced memory T cell response in vitro and in preclinical studies as well as immunological studies in kidney transplant recipients highlighting the effects of MSC therapy on memory CD8 T-cell proliferation and function.

RECENT FINDINGS

MSCs are able to inhibit in-vitro proliferation and effector functions of memory T cells in response to auto-antigen and allo-antigen stimulation. MSC infusion in animal transplant models resulted in a skew of the balance between regulatory T cells and effector/memory T cells towards a pro-tolerogenic profile. MSC in clinical transplantation is in its infancy and limited numbers of clinical studies have performed immunomonitoring of MSC-treated patients. However, available data support the capability of MSCs to control effector/memory CD8 T-cell proliferation and donor-specific CD8 T-cell function long lasting in kidney transplant setting.

SUMMARY

Recent studies of MSCs in kidney transplantation highlight the anticipated add-on value of the immunomodulatory properties of bone marrow derived MSCs in persistently inhibiting donor-specific effector/memory CD8 T cells, an effect not shared by the current immunosuppressive drugs.

Antibody-mediated rejection in young kidney transplant recipients: the dilemma of noncompliance and insufficient immunosuppression

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a recognized cause of late kidney allograft loss. Although ABMR may occur despite appropriate chronic immunosuppressive therapy, non-adherence both facilitates and accelerates the activation of the effector phase of the humoral immune response against the donor tissue, leading in turn to progressive kidney allograft rejection. Given the poor efficacy of rescue therapies for both acute and chronic late ABMR, establishing appropriate preventive strategies at different times before and after transplantation is a critical management goal.

CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT

In this report, we discuss the differential diagnoses and management of ABMR based on the clinical case report of a young kidney transplant recipient with progressive ABMR due to poor immunosuppressive adherence. In the absence of sensitive and specific non-invasive monitoring tools for alloimmune activation, the clinical dilemma in the management of the adolescent patient lies in differentiating between suboptimal prescribed immunosuppression and deliberate non-adherence to adequate immunosuppression dosing. Despite the advent of therapies to reduce ABMR injury, the graft is destined for untimely functional loss.

CONCLUSIONS

New biomarkers and tools for the accurate characterization of alloimmune risk before and after transplantation, and serial testing for de novo changes in circulating donor-specific alloantibodies, are urgently needed to support the delivery of optimized immunosuppression exposure.