1
|
Puliyanda D, Barday Z, Barday Z, Freedman A, Todo T, Chen AKC, Davidson B. Children Are Not Small Adults: Similarities and Differences in Renal Transplantation Between Adults and Pediatrics. Semin Nephrol 2023; 43:151442. [PMID: 37949683 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for all patients with end-stage kidney disease, including pediatric patients. Graft survival in pediatrics was lagging behind adults, but now is comparable with the adult cohort. Although many of the protocols have been adopted from adults, there are issues unique to pediatrics that one should be aware of to take care of this population. These issues include recipient size consideration, increased incidence of viral infections, problems related to growth, common occurrence of underlying urological issues, and psychosocial issues. This article addresses the similarities and differences in renal transplantation, from preparing a patient for transplant, the transplant process, to post-transplant complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dechu Puliyanda
- Pediatric Nephrology and Comprehensive Transplant Program, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Zibya Barday
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Zunaid Barday
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Andrew Freedman
- Pediatric Nephrology and Comprehensive Transplant Program, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tsuyoshi Todo
- Pediatric Nephrology and Comprehensive Transplant Program, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Allen Kuang Chung Chen
- Pediatric Nephrology and Comprehensive Transplant Program, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Bianca Davidson
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oomen L, Bootsma-Robroeks C, Cornelissen E, de Wall L, Feitz W. Pearls and Pitfalls in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation After 5 Decades. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:856630. [PMID: 35463874 PMCID: PMC9024248 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.856630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Worldwide, over 1,300 pediatric kidney transplantations are performed every year. Since the first transplantation in 1959, healthcare has evolved dramatically. Pre-emptive transplantations with grafts from living donors have become more common. Despite a subsequent improvement in graft survival, there are still challenges to face. This study attempts to summarize how our understanding of pediatric kidney transplantation has developed and improved since its beginnings, whilst also highlighting those areas where future research should concentrate in order to help resolve as yet unanswered questions. Existing literature was compared to our own data of 411 single-center pediatric kidney transplantations between 1968 and 2020, in order to find discrepancies and allow identification of future challenges. Important issues for future care are innovations in immunosuppressive medication, improving medication adherence, careful donor selection with regard to characteristics of both donor and recipient, improvement of surgical techniques and increased attention for lower urinary tract dysfunction and voiding behavior in all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes Oomen
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Bootsma-Robroeks
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Nephrology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth Cornelissen
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth de Wall
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wout Feitz
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shimizu T, Katano S, Nishida S, Kinoshita Y, Shinzato T, Sakuma Y, Iwami D. Development of strangulation ileus associated with the ureter of the transplanted kidney 18 years after kidney transplantation. IJU Case Rep 2021; 4:307-309. [PMID: 34497991 PMCID: PMC8413218 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION After kidney transplantation, patients should be treated with caution and monitored for surgical complications. Among the possible surgical complications, strangulation ileus after kidney transplantation is rare. CASE PRESENTATION A 59-year-old woman who had undergone kidney transplantation at 41 years of age presented to our hospital with lower abdominal pain. She was diagnosed with strangulation ileus and underwent emergency surgery. In the lower right abdomen, the small intestine was compressed by cord-like tissue running from the intraperitoneal space to the retroperitoneal space. We confirmed that the cord-like tissue was the ureter of the transplanted kidney. The necrotic small intestine was resected, and ureter-ureteral anastomosis of the ureter of the transplanted kidney was performed. CONCLUSION All surgical procedures, including ureteroneocystostomy, require careful attention. The occurrence of some postoperative surgical complications can be prevented by carefully performing the kidney transplantation procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiro Shimizu
- Department ofRenal Surgery and TransplantationJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
| | - Saki Katano
- Department ofRenal Surgery and TransplantationJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
| | - Sho Nishida
- Department ofRenal Surgery and TransplantationJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
| | - Yoshitaka Kinoshita
- Department ofRenal Surgery and TransplantationJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
| | - Takahiro Shinzato
- Department ofRenal Surgery and TransplantationJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
| | - Yasunaru Sakuma
- Department ofGastroenterological, General and Transplant SurgeryJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
| | - Daiki Iwami
- Department ofRenal Surgery and TransplantationJichi Medical UniversityTochigiJapan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ooms LSS, Minnee RC, Dor FJMF, Kimenai DJAN, Tran KCK, Hartog H, van de Wetering J, Willemsen SP, IJzermans JNM, Terkivatan T. Stenting the ureteroneocystostomy reduces urological complications in kidney transplantation: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial, SPLINT trial. Transpl Int 2020; 33:1190-1198. [PMID: 32403158 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The role of ureteral stents in living-donor kidney transplantation remains uncertain. In this randomized controlled trial (SPLINT), we compared urological complications in living-donor kidney transplantations performed with or without stents. We included 200 consecutive patients that received living-donor kidney transplantations at the Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam. Patients (124 males, 76 females, mean age 54 ± 13) were randomized for suprapubic externalized single J stents (N = 100) or no stent (N = 100). The primary outcome was the probability of a percutaneous nephrostomy insertion (PCN) during a 12-month follow-up. To assess whether no stenting is noninferior to stenting, we allowed the probability of a PCN to increase by at most 5% (this is the noninferiority margin). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. In the no-stent group, there were more PCN insertions, 14% (95% CI 4.3-23.7%); urinary leakages, 12% (95% CI 5.4-21.3%); and surgical re-interventions because of urological complications, 8% (95% CI 1.5-14.5%). The stent group had more hematuria, 26% (95% CI 13.1-38.9%); and graft rejections, 15% (95% CI 2.7-27.3%). Patients in both groups had similar mean GFRs at several time points. Besides a better Euro-Qol-5D in the no-stent group at 2 and 6 weeks postoperative, similar quality of life was reported based on SF-36 and Euro-Qol-5D scores. In this trial, noninferiority has not been demonstrated for no-stent placement in relation to the number urological complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liselotte S S Ooms
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Minnee
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J M F Dor
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Diederik J A N Kimenai
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Khe C K Tran
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hermien Hartog
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sten P Willemsen
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan N M IJzermans
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Turkan Terkivatan
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Friedersdorff F, Weinberger S, Biernath N, Plage H, Cash H, El-Bandar N. The Ureter in the Kidney Transplant Setting: Ureteroneocystostomy Surgical Options, Double-J Stent Considerations and Management of Related Complications. Curr Urol Rep 2020; 21:3. [DOI: 10.1007/s11934-020-0956-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
In the setting of kidney transplantation, the ureter is a common source for complications. As a result, prevention of ureteral complications and their management is of crucial importance. In this context, the purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature on the ureter in the kidney transplant setting with a special focus on new findings. We conducted a PubMed and Medline search over the last 10 years to identify all new publications related to ureteroneoimplantations, stents and management of complications in the kidney transplant setting.
Recent Findings
Performance of the “Lich-Gregoir” technique for ureteroneocystostomy seems to be favourable in regard to postoperative complications when compared with other methods described in the literature. Moreover, major urologic complications can be further reduced by ureteral stenting.
Summary
A new approach for management of ureteral strictures in renal transplants is presented. We discussed the usage of a ureteral stent covered with a biostable polymer aiming to prevent tissue ingrowth into the lumen as a new option for management of ureteral stricture in the kidney transplant setting.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bruintjes MHD, d'Ancona FCH, Zhu X, Hoitsma AJ, Warlé MC. An Update on Early Urological Complications in Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Study. Ann Transplant 2019; 24:617-624. [PMID: 31792196 PMCID: PMC6909919 DOI: 10.12659/aot.920086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
<strong>BACKGROUND</strong> This study aimed to provide an update on the occurrence of early urological complications in living-donor and deceased-donor kidney transplantation (KTX). <strong>MATERIAL AND METHODS</strong> Data on all kidney transplant recipients in the Netherlands between January 2005 and December 2015 were retrieved from the prospectively collected Dutch National Organ Transplant Registry Database (NOTR). We assessed the incidence of major urological complications (MUCs) within 3 months after KTX, defined as urinary leakage and ureteral obstruction. Outcomes of living donor and deceased donor kidney transplants were compared. We performed regression analysis to identify predictive factors of urological complications and studied the influence of early urological complications on graft and patient survival. We performed an additional sub-study to explore the influence of preservation of the peri-ureteric connective tissue in living-donor KTX on the occurrence of urological complications. <strong>RESULTS</strong> Among 3329 kidney transplant recipients, urological complications occurred in 208 patients (6.2%) within 3 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in complication rates between recipients from living donors and deceased donors. Multiple regression analysis showed that older donor age and previous cardiac events of the recipient were predictors for the development of urological complications. Graft and patient survival were not affected by early MUCs. The additional sub-study showed that preservation of peri-ureteric tissue within living-donor KTX was not independently associated with urological complications. <strong>CONCLUSIONS</strong> Many living- and deceased-donor KTX recipients have early urological complications. MUCs did not affect long-term graft or patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moira H D Bruintjes
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Frank C H d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Xiaoye Zhu
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Andries J Hoitsma
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ness D, Olsburgh J. UTI in kidney transplant. World J Urol 2019; 38:81-88. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02742-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
8
|
. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2018; 16. [DOI: 10.6002/ect.2016.0283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
9
|
Simsek C, Dogan S, Piskin T, Okut G, Cayhan K, Aykas A, Tatar E, Uslu A. Should Interventional Radiology or Open Surgery Be the First Choice for the Management of Ureteric Stenosis After Transplantation? Dual-Center Study. Transplant Proc 2017; 49:517-522. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
10
|
Park KM, Nam HS, Hussein KH, Woo HM. Surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux with recurrent urinary tract infection after renal transplantation in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2016; 248:309-14. [PMID: 26799110 DOI: 10.2460/javma.248.3.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
CASE DESCRIPTION A 3-year-old male Cocker Spaniel renal transplant recipient was readmitted 39 weeks after transplantation because of acute clinical signs of pollakiuria, intermittent vomiting, decreased appetite, lethargy, and mild fever. CLINICAL FINDINGS Hydronephrosis and hydroureter were observed with ultrasonography and contrast cystography, and a diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was made. Urinary tract infection (UTI) caused by Escherichia coli was also diagnosed on the basis of results of urine culture. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME Despite treatment of the UTI with an appropriate antimicrobial for 6 weeks, the VUR persisted and the UTI recurred 9 weeks after cessation of antimicrobial treatment. Therefore, surgical correction by means of revision extravesicular ureteroneocytostomy was performed. Both VUR and hydronephrosis resolved after surgery. No recurrences of clinical signs of urinary tract complications were observed during the subsequent 22-month follow-up period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Results suggested that ureteral reimplantation with an extravesicular technique incorporating a long submucosal tunnel may be an effective treatment for VUR when medical management fails in canine renal transplant recipients with recurrent UTIs.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ooms LSS, Spaans LG, Betjes MGH, Ijzermans JNM, Terkivatan T. Minimizing the Number of Urological Complications After Kidney Transplant: A Comparative Study of Two Types of External Ureteral Stents. EXP CLIN TRANSPLANT 2016; 15:143-149. [PMID: 27562020 DOI: 10.6002/ect.2016.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 2 types of external ureteral stents on the number of urological complications after kidney transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from 366 consecutive transplants performed between January 2013 and January 2015 in our hospital, in which an external ureteral stent was placed during surgery and removed after 9 days. Urological complications were defined as urinary leakage or ureteral stenosis requiring percutaneous nephrostomy placement. RESULTS A total of 197 patients received a straight stent with 2 larger side holes (type A; 8F "Covidien" tube; Covidien, Dublin, Ireland) and 169 patients received a single J stent with 7 smaller side holes (type B; 7F "Teleflex" single J stent; Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Ireland). We found a significantly higher number of percutaneous nephrostomy placements with type A stents, with 34 (17%) versus 16 (9%) in type B (P = .030). Reason for percutaneous nephrostomy placement, occurrence of stent dysfunction, and need for early removal (< 8 days) were equal in both groups (P = .397), whereas incidence of rejection and urinary tract infection were higher in type B stent group. Patient and graft survival did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Use of the type B stent was associated with less urological complications compared with the type A stent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liselotte S S Ooms
- Department of Surgery Division of Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ooms LSS, Slagt IKB, Dor FJMF, Kimenai HJAN, Tran KTC, Betjes MGH, IJzermans JNM, Terkivatan T. Ureteral length in live donor kidney transplantation; Does size matter? Transpl Int 2015. [PMID: 26211787 DOI: 10.1111/tri.12635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of ureteral length on urological complications. Data were retrospective collected from the INEX-trial database, a RCT to compare the intravesical to the extravesical ureteroneocystostomy. Ureteral length was measured in 198 recipients and used to divide recipients into three categories based on interquartile ranges: short (≤8.5 cm), medium (8.6-10.9 cm) and long ureters (≥11 cm). Urological complications were defined as the number of percutaneous nephrostomy placements (PCN). Fifty recipients fell into the short, 98 into the medium and 50 recipients into the long ureter category. Median follow-up was 26 (range 2-45) months. There was no significant difference in number of PCN placements between the categories. There were 9 (18%) PCN placements in the short ureter category, 21 (20%) in medium ureter category and 10 (21%) in the long ureter category, P = 0.886. Risk factor analysis for gender, arterial multiplicity and type of ureteroneocystostomy showed no differences in PCN placements between the three ureteral length categories. We conclude that ureteral length alone does not seem to influence the number of urological complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liselotte S S Ooms
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inez K B Slagt
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J M F Dor
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J A N Kimenai
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Khe T C Tran
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan N M IJzermans
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Türkan Terkivatan
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Koch M, Kantas A, Ramcke K, Drabik AI, Nashan B. Surgical complications after kidney transplantation: different impacts of immunosuppression, graft function, patient variables, and surgical performance. Clin Transplant 2015; 29:252-60. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Koch
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Alexandros Kantas
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Katja Ramcke
- St. Bernhard-Hospital gemeinnützige GmbH; Brake Germany
| | - Anna I. Drabik
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| | - Björn Nashan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation; Universitätsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf; Hamburg Germany
| |
Collapse
|