Pharmacogenetics of tacrolimus: ready for clinical translation?

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling-guided rational combination of tacrolimus and voriconazole in patients with different CYP3A5 and CYP2C19 alleles

The drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between tacrolimus and voriconazole are highly variable among individuals. We aimed to develop a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the DDIs in people with different CYP3A5 and CYP2C19 alleles. First, pharmacokinetic data of humans receiving tacrolimus with or without voriconazole from the literature were used to construct and validate the PBPK model. Thereafter, we developed a model incorporating the metabolism of voriconazole mediated by CYP2C19 and the inhibitory effect of voriconazole on CYP3A4/5. Finally, the model was used to evaluate the dose adjustment of tacrolimus in people with different CYP3A5 and CYP2C19 alleles. When tacrolimus was administered alone (3 mg PO, single dose), the predicted AUC_0-∞ of tacrolimus in CYP3A5 nonexpressers (19.22) was 3.5-fold higher than that in expressers (5.48). Following voriconazole (200 mg PO, bid) administration in human with different CYP2C19 genotypes, the AUC_0-∞ of tacrolimus increased by 5.1- to 8.3-fold in CYP3A5 expressers and by 5.3- to 10.2-fold in CYP3A5 nonexpressers. The lower the gene expression level of CYP2C19 in the population, the higher the exposure to tacrolimus. When tacrolimus was combined with voriconazole (200 mg, bid; 400 mg, bid, on Day 1), the final model simulations suggested that the dose regimen of tacrolimus should be regulated to 0.15 mg/kg/day (qd) in CYP3A5 expressers with different CYP2C19 genotypes. For CYP3A5 nonexpressers, the dosing schedule of tacrolimus should be modified to 0.05 mg/kg/24 h for patients with 2C19 EM, 0.05 mg/kg/48 h for 2C19 IM and 0.05 mg/kg/72 h for 2C19 PM. In conclusion, a PBPK model with CYP3A5 and CYP2C19 polymorphisms was successfully established, providing more insights regarding the DDIs between tacrolimus and voriconazole to guide the clinical use of tacrolimus.

Rectal INdomethacin, oral TacROlimus, or their combination for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (INTRO Trial): Protocol for a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis remains the most common and morbid complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The use of rectal indomethacin and pancreatic duct stenting has been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), but these interventions have limitations. Recent clinical and translational evidence suggests a role for calcineurin inhibitors in the prevention of pancreatitis, with multiple retrospective case series showing a reduction in PEP rates in tacrolimus users.

METHODS

The INTRO trial is a multicenter, international, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial. A total of 4,874 patients undergoing ERCP will be randomized to receive either oral tacrolimus (5 mg) or oral placebo 1-2 h before ERCP, and followed for 30 days post-procedure. Blood and pancreatic aspirate samples will also be collected in a subset of patients to quantify tacrolimus levels. The primary outcome of the study is the incidence of PEP. Secondary endpoints include the severity of PEP, ERCP-related complications, adverse drug events, length of hospital stay, cost-effectiveness, and the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of tacrolimus immune modulation in the pancreas.

CONCLUSIONS

The INTRO trial will assess the role of calcineurin inhibitors in PEP prophylaxis and develop a foundation for the clinical optimization of this therapeutic strategy from a pharmacologic and economic standpoint. With this clinical trial, we hope to demonstrate a novel approach to PEP prophylaxis using a widely available and well-characterized class of drugs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05252754, registered on February 14, 2022.

Evaluation of Pharmacogenetics of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Efflux Transporter in Renal Transplants Receiving Immunosuppressants

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, such as CYP3A4, and CYP3A5, P450 oxidoreductase (POR), peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPAR-alpha), and drug transporter (ABCB1) were observed to influence concentrations of immunosuppressants (cyclosporine, everolimus, sirolimus, and tacrolimus) and outcomes in renal transplants. We carried out the present study to evaluate the prevalence and impact of these single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in adult renal transplants. SNPs were evaluated using commercial TaqMan^® assays. Serum drug concentrations were estimated using immunoassays. One hundred and forty-six patients were recruited. SNPs in CYP3A5*3 were significantly associated with greater dose-adjusted cyclosporine and tacrolimus concentrations. SNPs in POR*28 were observed with significantly lower dose-adjusted concentrations, particularly with cyclosporine and tacrolimus. ABCB1 homozygous polymorphisms were observed with significantly lower time spent in the therapeutic range with cyclosporine and everolimus/sirolimus. Cyclosporine was observed in a significantly greater proportion of patients with elevated GGT, and SNPs in PPAR-alpha were significantly associated with an increased risk of this adverse event. Hypertriglyceridemia with everolimus was significantly associated with POR*28 polymorphisms. There is a need to validate the influence of these SNPs in a prospective study and develop an algorithm predicting the achievement of target concentrations.

Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus-Based Maintenance Regimens in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND Tacrolimus is an established component of immunosuppressive regimens for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs); however, data comparing long-term outcomes between formulations are lacking. We conducted a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis assessing tacrolimus (primarily Advagraf [once-daily] and Prograf [twice-daily])-based maintenance regimens. MATERIAL AND METHODS Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases and congress proceedings were searched to identify studies of adult de novo KTRs who received tacrolimus-based therapy in phase II/III randomized controlled trials. Outcomes were acute rejection, graft/patient survival, and incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to analyze treatment effects on graft/patient survival. RESULTS Sixty-eight publications (61 primary) were included. Of 21 publications reporting graft rejection following Advagraf or Prograf treatment in ≥1 study arm, 12-month biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) ranged from 3.3% with Prograf to 55.0% with mycophenolic acid (MPA)+corticosteroids (CS); >24 month BPAR ranged from 0% to 58.7% (the latter with bleselumab-based therapy). Fourteen publications reported graft loss following Advagraf (0-9.6%) or Prograf (0-7.5%). Patient mortality ≤24 months after transplantation (14 publications) ranged from 0% to 8.1% with Advagraf or Prograf. Advagraf+MPA+CS and reference treatment, Prograf+MPA+CS, were associated with a similar risk of graft loss (odds ratio 1.19; 95% credible-interval 0.51, 3.06) and mortality (odds ratio 1.21; 95% credible-interval 0.1557, 9.03). Incidence of NODAT and CMV varied by treatment arm. CONCLUSIONS Graft loss and patient mortality rates were generally comparable between Advagraf- and Prograf-based regimens. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate longer-term outcomes.

Pharmacogenetics Based Dose Prediction Model for Initial Tacrolimus Dosing in Renal Transplant Recipients

Tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant used in solid organ transplantation, has a narrow therapeutic index and exhibits inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability. Achieving and maintaining a therapeutic level of the drug by giving appropriate doses is crucial for successful immunosuppression, especially during the initial post-transplant period. We studied the effect of CYP3A5, CYP3A4, and ABCB1 gene polymorphisms on tacrolimus trough concentrations in South Indian renal transplant recipients from Kerala to formulate a genotype-based dosing equation to calculate the required starting daily dose of tacrolimus to be given to each patient to attain optimal initial post-transplant period drug level. We also investigated the effect of these genes on drug-induced adverse effects and rejection episodes and looked into the global distribution of allele frequencies of these polymorphisms. One hundred forty-five renal transplant recipients on a triple immunosuppressive regimen of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid were included in this study. Clinical data including tacrolimus daily doses, trough levels (C0) and dose-adjusted tacrolimus trough concentration (C0/D) in blood at three time points (day 6, 6 months, and 1-year post-transplantation), adverse drug effects, rejection episodes, serum creatinine levels, etc., were recorded. The patients were genotyped for CYP3A5*3, CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A4*1G, ABCB1 G2677T, and ABCB1 C3435T polymorphisms by the PCR-RFLP method. We found that CYP3A5*3 polymorphism was the single most strongly associated factor determining the tacrolimus C0/D in blood at all three time points (p < 0.001). Using multiple linear regression, we formulated a simple and easy to compute equation that will help the clinician calculate the starting tacrolimus dose per kg body weight to be administered to a patient to attain optimal initial post-transplant period tacrolimus level. CYP3A5 expressors had an increased chance of rejection than non-expressors (p = 0.028), while non-expressors had an increased risk for new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) than expressors (p = 0.018). Genotype-guided initial tacrolimus dosing would help transplant recipients achieve optimal initial post-transplant period tacrolimus levels and thus prevent the adverse effects due to overdose and rejection due to inadequate dose. We observed inter-population differences in allele frequencies of drug metabolizer and transporter genes, emphasizing the importance of formulating population-specific dose prediction models to draw results of clinical relevance.

Tacrolimus Dose-Conversion Ratios Based on Switching of Formulations for Patients with Solid Organ Transplants

Background

Tacrolimus may be administered during hospitalization as an IV formulation or oral suspension. However, literature suggesting appropriate ratios for conversion from these formulations to capsules is limited.

Objective

To evaluate conversion ratios after a switch in formulation of tacrolimus for solid-organ transplant recipients.

Methods

This single-centre observational longitudinal study involved hospitalized patients who underwent a switch in formulation of tacrolimus according to 1 of 3 possible scenarios: IV to oral suspension, IV to capsule, or oral suspension to capsule. Data were collected from the earliest accessible electronic file (January 2009) to January 1, 2019. Conversion ratios were calculated for each of the 3 groups using data for blood concentrations and doses before and after the switch. The calculated ratios were then compared with recommended conversion ratios: 1:5 (i.e., 1 mg of IV tacrolimus is converted to 5 mg of oral tacrolimus, expressed as "5") for either of the switches involving an IV formulation and 1:1 (i.e., same amount, expressed as "1") for the switch from oral formulation to capsules.

Results

For the group who underwent switching from the IV formulation to oral suspension, the mean calculated conversion ratio was 3.04, which was significantly different from the recommended ratio of 5. For the group who underwent switching from the IV formulation to capsules, the calculated conversion ratio was 5.18, which was not significantly different from the recommended ratio of 5. For the group who underwent switching from oral suspension to capsules, the calculated conversion ratio was 1.17, which was not significantly different from the recommended ratio of 1.

Conclusion

In this small retrospective study of tacrolimus therapy, the calculated conversion ratio was significantly different from the recommended ratio for patients who were switched from IV administration to oral suspension, but not for those switched from IV administration or oral suspension to capsules. Therapeutic drug monitoring therefore appears indispensable, regardless of conversion ratios.

Frequency of ABCB1 C3435T and CYP3A5*3 Genetic Polymorphisms in the Lebanese Population

OBJECTIVES

CYP3A5 and ABCB1 are highly implicated in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of immunosuppressive agents, such as calcineurin inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. The polymorphisms of their coding genes play important roles in the interindividual and intraindividual differences of bioavailability of these drugs. In this study, our objective was to investigate, in a Lebanese population,the frequency of ABCB1C3435T (rs1045642) and CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) polymorphisms and to compare the results to preexisting data from other populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We determined the frequencies of the allelic variants of interest for 1824 Lebanese participants, and we compared these results with those from other major ethnic groups.

RESULTS

The allelic frequencies were 91.4% (C) and 8.6% (T) for CYP3A5*3 and 50.8% (T) and 49.2% (C) for ABCB1 C3435T. Our results were significantly different from most other world populations, except the European population.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequencies of gene variants of interest in our Lebanese population were similar to those found in European populations. Most of our study population were CYP3A5*3 carriers, and more than half may have a lower P-glycoprotein efflux pump. These characteristics might render Lebanese transplant recipients more prone to the development of drug toxicity and in need of lower drug doses.

Investigation of the Impact of CYP3A5 Polymorphism on Drug-Drug Interaction between Tacrolimus and Schisantherin A/Schisandrin A Based on Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling

Wuzhi capsule (WZC) is commonly prescribed with tacrolimus in China to ease drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Two abundant active ingredients, schisantherin A (STA) and schisandrin A (SIA) are known to inhibit CYP3A enzymes and increase tacrolimus’s exposure. Our previous study has quantitatively demonstrated the contribution of STA and SIA to tacrolimus pharmacokinetics based on physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. In the current work, we performed reversible inhibition (RI) and time-dependent inhibition (TDI) assays with CYP3A5 genotyped human liver microsomes (HLMs), and further integrated the acquired parameters into the PBPK model to predict the drug–drug interaction (DDI) in patients with different CYP3A5 alleles. The results indicated STA was a time-dependent and reversible inhibitor of CYP3A4 while only a reversible inhibitor of CYP3A5; SIA inhibited CYP3A4 and 3A5 in a time-dependent manner but also reversibly inhibited CYP3A5. The predicted fold-increases of tacrolimus exposure were 2.70 and 2.41, respectively, after the multidose simulations of STA. SIA also increased tacrolimus’s exposure but to a smaller extent compared to STA. An optimized physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model integrated with CYP3A5 polymorphism was successfully established, providing more insights regarding the long-term DDI between tacrolimus and Wuzhi capsules in patients with different CYP3A5 genotypes.

CYP3A5 gene polymorphisms and their impact on dosage and trough concentration of tacrolimus among kidney transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tacrolimus is an immunosuppressive drug widely used in kidney transplantation. Cytochrome P450 3A5 (CYP3A5) protein is involved in tacrolimus metabolism. Single nucleotide polymorphism in the CYP3A5 gene (6986A>G) results in alteration in metabolic activity of CYP3A5 protein which eventually affects the tacrolimus concentration. Patients with CYP3A5 expresser genotypes (A/A *1/*1 and A/G *1/*3) metabolize tacrolimus more rapidly than CYP3A5 nonexpressers (G/G *3/*3). We performed meta-analysis to estimate the effect of CYP3A5 polymorphism on the trough concentration-dose ratio (Co/D) and risk of renal allograft rejection with similar post-transplant periods and Asian vs. European populations. Our results showed that the tacrolimus Co/D ratio is significantly lower in CYP3A5 expresser group as compared with nonexpresser in Asian as well as in European populations at any post-transplant period (p < 0.00001). No significant association was found with renal allograft rejection episodes between expressers and nonexpressers in European populations (OR: 1.12; p = 0.47). Interestingly, Asian population (with expresser genotypes) and patients after 3 years post-transplantation (with expresser genotypes) have a higher risk of rejection (OR: 1.62; p < 0.05), (OR: 1.68; p < 0.05), respectively. This could be due to high prevalence of expresser genotypes in Asian population. Few tacrolimus-based studies are identified with long-term graft survival. There is a need to have more studies looking for long-term graft survival in expresser as well as no-expresser groups especially in Asian populations who have high frequency of CYP3A5 functional genotype.

SNPs affecting the clinical outcomes of regularly used immunosuppressants

Recent studies have suggested that genomic diversity may play a key role in different clinical outcomes, and the importance of SNPs is becoming increasingly clear. In this article, we summarize the bioactivity of SNPs that may affect the sensitivity to or possibility of drug reactions that occur among the signaling pathways of regularly used immunosuppressants, such as glucocorticoids, azathioprine, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide and methotrexate. The development of bioinformatics, including machine learning models, has enabled prediction of the proper immunosuppressant dosage with minimal adverse drug reactions for patients after organ transplantation or for those with autoimmune diseases. This article provides a theoretical basis for the personalized use of immunosuppressants in the future.

From gut to kidney: transporting and metabolizing calcineurin-inhibitors in solid organ transplantation

Since their introduction circa 35 years ago, calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) have become the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation. However, CNI's possess a narrow therapeutic index with potential severe consequences of drug under- or overexposure. This demands a meticulous policy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) to optimize outcome. In clinical practice optimal dosing is difficult to achieve due to important inter- and intraindividual variation in CNI pharmacokinetics. A complex and often interdependent set of factors appears relevant in determining drug exposure. These include recipient characteristics such as age, race, body composition, organ function, and food intake, but also graft-related characteristics such as: size, donor-age, and time after transplantation can be important. Fundamental (in vitro) and clinical studies have pointed out the intrinsic relation between the aforementioned variables and the functional capacity of enzymes and transporters involved in CNI metabolism, primarily located in intestine, liver and kidney. Commonly occurring polymorphisms in genes responsible for CNI metabolism (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7, PXR, POR, ABCB1 (P-gp) and possibly UGT) are able to explain an important part of interindividual variability. In particular, a highly prevalent SNP in CYP3A5 has proven to be an important determinant of CNI dose requirements and drug-dose-interactions. In addition, a discrepancy in genotype between graft and receptor has to be taken into account. Furthermore, common phenomena in solid organ transplantation such as inflammation, ischemia- reperfusion injury, graft function, co-medication, altered food intake and intestinal motility can have a differential effect on the expression enzymes and transporters involved in CNI metabolism. Notwithstanding the built-up knowledge, predicting individual CNI pharmacokinetics and dose requirements on the basis of current clinical and experimental data remains a challenge.