Ventricular natriuretic peptide (BNP) in heart transplantation: BNP correlation with endomyocardial biopsy, laboratory and hemodynamic measures

Diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide to detect complications of cardiac transplantation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the utility of BNP and NT-proBNP in identifying adverse recipient outcomes following cardiac transplantation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023. We included studies reporting associations between BNP or NT-proBNP and adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation in adults. We calculated standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); or confusion matrices with sensitivities and specificities. Where meta-analysis was inappropriate, studies were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies involving 2,297 cardiac transplantation recipients were included. We report no significant association between BNP or NT-proBNP and significant acute cellular rejection of grade 3A or higher (SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.06-0.86) as defined by the latest 2004 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines. We also report no strong associations between BNP or NT-proBNP and cardiac allograft vasculopathy or antibody mediated rejection.

CONCLUSION

In isolation, serum BNP and NT-proBNP lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to reliably predict adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation.

A primer for managing cardiac transplant patients in the emergency department setting

BACKGROUND

Cardiac transplant is an effective long-term management option for several severe cardiac diseases. These cardiac transplant patients may present to the emergency department with a range of issues involving the cardiac transplantation, including complications due to their transplant as well as altered presentations of disease resulting from their transplant.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review provides a focused guide to the evaluation and management of patients with cardiac transplantation and its complications.

DISCUSSION

Cardiac transplant is an effective therapy for end-stage heart failure. A transplanted heart varies both anatomically and physiologically from a native heart. Several significant complications may occur. Graft failure, rejection, and infection are common causes of morbidity and mortality within the first year of transplant. As these patients are on significant immunosuppressive medication regimens, they are at risk of infection, but inadequate immunosuppression increases the risk of acute rejection. A variety of dysrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation and ventricular dysrhythmias may occur. These patients are also at risk of acute coronary syndrome, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and medication adverse events. Importantly, patients with acute coronary syndrome can have an altered presentation with the so-called "painless" myocardial infarction. Consultation with the transplant physician is recommended, if available, for these patients to assist in evaluation and management.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of the presentations and various complications that may affect patients with cardiac transplant will assist emergency clinicians in the care of these patients.

Noninvasive biomarkers for prediction and diagnosis of heart transplantation rejection

For most patients with end-stage heart failure, heart transplantation is the treatment of choice. Allograft rejection is one of the major post-transplantation complications affecting graft outcome and survival. Recent advancements in science and technology offer an opportunity to integrate genomic and other omics-based biomarkers into clinical practice, facilitating noninvasive evaluation of allograft for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Omics, including gene expression profiling (GEP) of blood immune cell components and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) are of special interest to researchers. Several studies have investigated levels of dd-cfDNA and miroRNAs in blood as potential markers for early detection of allograft rejection. One of the achievements in the field of transcriptomics is AlloMap, GEP of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), which can identify 11 differentially expressed genes and help with detection of moderate and severe acute cellular rejection in stable heart transplant recipients. In recent years, the utilization of GEP of PBMC for identifying differentially expressed genes to diagnose acute antibody-mediated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy has yielded promising results. Advancements in the field of metabolomics and proteomics as well as their potential implications have been further discussed in this paper.

Brain natriuretic peptide and right heart dysfunction after heart transplantation

Heart transplantation (HT) should normalize cardiac endocrine function, but brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels remain elevated after HT, even in the absence of left ventricular hemodynamic disturbance or allograft rejection. Right ventricle (RV) abnormalities are common in HT recipients (HTx), as a result of engraftment process, tricuspid insufficiency, and/or repeated inflammation due to iterative endomyocardial biopsies. RV function follow-up is vital for patient management as RV dysfunction is a recognized cause of in-hospital death and is responsible for a worse prognosis. Interestingly, few and controversial data are available concerning the relationship between plasma BNP levels and RV functional impairment in HTx. This suggests that infra-clinical modifications, such as subtle immune system disorders or hypoxic conditions, might influence BNP expression. Nevertheless, due to other altered circulating molecular forms of BNP, a lack of specificity of BNP assays is described in heart failure patients. This phenomenon could exist in HT population and could explain elevated BNP plasmatic levels despite a normal RV function. In clinical practice, intra-individual change in BNP over time, rather than absolute BNP values, might be more helpful in detecting right cardiac dysfunction in HTx.

Biomarkers of acute rejection following cardiac transplantation

Cardiac transplantation can be a life-saving treatment for selected patients with heart failure. However, despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy, acute allograft rejection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The current 'gold standard' for rejection surveillance is endomyocardial biopsy, which aims to identify episodes of rejection prior to development of clinical manifestations. This is an invasive technique with a risk of false-positive and false-negative results. Consequently, a wide variety of noninvasive alternatives have been investigated for their potential role as biomarkers of rejection. This article reviews the evidence behind proposed alternatives such as imaging techniques, electrophysiological parameters and peripheral blood markers, and highlights the potential future role for biomarkers in cardiac transplantation as an adjunct to biopsy.

Brain natriuretic Peptide production and secretion in inflammation

Gene expression and secretion of the cardiac polypeptide hormones atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are simultaneously upregulated in various cardiac disorders such as congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and hypertensive heart disease, in which hemodynamic or neuroendocrine changes are key components in the progression of disease. However, during acute cardiac allograft rejection, plasma BNP levels are increased but not those of ANF. Successful treatment of the rejection episode decreases the elevated plasma BNP to prerejection values suggesting that substances related to inflammation may selectively influence BNP gene expression. Indeed, cytokines such as TNFα and IL-1β selectively stimulate cardiac BNP at the transcriptional and translational levels in cardiomyocyte cultures without affecting ANF. This selective BNP increase is seen in vivo, in addition to acute cardiac allograft rejection, in several circumstances where inflammation significantly contributes to the pathogenesis of disease such as in sepsis and in acute myocarditis.

Changes in serial B-type natriuretic peptide level independently predict cardiac allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Despite positive associations with rejection, the clinical value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) monitoring in heart transplant recipients has not been established. We sought to determine the predictive value of changes in serial BNP level for identifying patients with acute allograft rejection.

METHODS

BNP, hemodynamics and biopsies were obtained for 205 transplant recipients who underwent a total of 4,007 endomyocardial biopsy procedures. Samples analyzed were collected ≥ 180 days post-transplant, without evidence of rejection on the immediately preceding biopsy. Using a repeated-measures multivariate model, we assessed the association of change in BNP with Grade ≥ 3A (2R) rejection. We also determined predictive values of various cut-off thresholds of change in serial BNP levels to predict Grade ≥ 3A rejection.

RESULTS

There were 47 episodes of Grade ≥ 3A rejection among the 1,350 samples analyzed. Median change in serial BNP (ΔBNP) for those with Grade ≥ 3A rejection was 20 pg/ml (IQR -26 to 169 pg/ml) and among those with Grade <3A rejection was -4 pg/ml (IQR -34 to 22 pg/ml, p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, ΔBNP remained the most potent independent predictor of Grade ≥ 3A rejection (p = 0.001). ΔBNP >100 pg/ml predicted increased risk of Grade ≥ 3A rejection (OR = 5.3, p < 0.001) with high specificity (93.3%) and positive predictive value (13.0%) and excellent negative predictive value (97.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Change in serial BNP level is an independent predictor of cardiac allograft rejection. With wide availability, rapid turnaround, low cost, favorable positive predictive value and excellent negative predictive value, serial BNP monitoring has several advantages for non-invasive monitoring of heart transplant recipients for acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Brain natriuretic peptide induces CD8+ T cell death via a caspase 3 associated pathway--implications following heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) remains elevated after cardiac transplantation despite replacement of the failing ventricle. Serum peaks are also seen during acute rejection episodes independent of intracardiac hemodynamic disturbance. High BNP levels are also reported during bacterial sepsis, burns, stroke and myocardial infarction. Given all of these conditions are linked by immune activation processes, we hypothesised that BNP is an immunoactive agent.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood of 40 cardiac transplant recipients. Cells were co-cultured for 72h in the presence or absence of BNP. Cells were then immunophenotyped using flow cytometry. Cell death pathways were determined using caspase 3 quantification and mitochondrial membrane assessment. Supernatants were analysed for cytokine, chemokine and growth factor production using luminex.

RESULTS

Co-culture of CD8+ T cells with BNP reduced cell number, and increased intracellular caspase 3. Supernatant analysis revealed that BNP reduced the expression of inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1α and IL-6. However it preserved the production of anti-inflammatory and regulatory cytokines such as IL-4, 5 and 13.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide evidence that BNP directly induces CD8+ T cell apoptosis via a caspase 3 associated mechanism from cardiac transplant patients. This may impart significant consequences on immune mediated disease processes, such as allograft rejection.

[Usefulness of high sensitivity troponin T assay in detecting acute allograft rejection after heart transplantation]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Detection of acute allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients by noninvasive methods is a challenge in the management of these patients. In this study, the usefulness of a new highly sensitive method for the measurement of troponin T is evaluated.

METHODS

We designed a case-crossover study, in which each patient served as his or her own control, by selecting samples from treated acute rejection episodes (29 cases) and samples obtained immediately before and/or after rejection (38 controls). The highly sensitive troponin T was measured by a new pre-commercial test (Elecsys Troponin T HS).

RESULTS

In all samples, highly sensitive troponin T was detectable, with a median of 0.068 ng/L (IQR, 0.030-0.300 ng/L). The levels correlated with right atrial pressure (r=0.37; P=.002), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration (r=0.67; P<.001), and time since transplantation (r=-0.81; P<.001). The highly sensitive troponin T concentrations were higher in patients with rejection (0.155 ng/mL vs 0.047 ng/mL; P=.006). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the area under the curve was 0.67 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.77) and the best cutoff was 0.035 ng/mL, which was associated with rejection (odds ratio=3.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.9; P=.02). By restricting the analysis to the first 2 months, the area under the curve increased to 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.66-0.97), with an optimal cutoff of 1.10 ng/mL (S=58% [28%-85%]; E=100% [74%-100%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Troponin T was detectable in all samples when a new highly sensitive assay was used, and at higher concentrations in the presence of acute rejection; however, the usefulness of this test in patient management is limited to support for clinical or histological suspicion of rejection, especially in the early post-transplant period.

Endocrine heart after lung transplantation: increased brain natriuretic peptide is related to right ventricular function

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) increases in proportion to the extent of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary hypertension and after heart transplantation. No data are available after lung transplantation. Clinical, biological, respiratory, echocardiographic characteristics and circulating BNP and its second messenger cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) were determined in thirty matched subjects (10 lung-, 10 heart-transplant recipients (Ltx, Htx) and 10 healthy controls). Eventual correlations between these parameters were investigated. Heart rate and pulmonary arterial blood pressure were slightly increased after transplantation. Creatinine clearance was decreased. Mean of forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 76.6 +/- 5.3% and vital capacity was 85.3 +/- 6.4% of the predicted values in Ltx. BNP was similarly increased in Ltx and Htx, as compared with control values (54.1 +/- 14.2 and 45.6 +/- 9.2 vs. 6.2 +/- 1.8 pg/ml, respectively). Significant relationships were observed between plasma BNP and cGMP values (r = 0.62; P < 0.05 and r = 0.75; P < 0.01, in Ltx and Htx) and between BNP and right ventricular fractional shortening and tricuspid E/Ea ratio in Ltx (r = -0.75 and r = 0.93; P < 0.01, respectively). BNP is increased after lung transplantation, like after heart transplantation. The relationships observed suggest that the cardiac hormone might counterbalance possible deleterious effects of lung-transplantation on right functioning of patient's heart.

Cardiac hormones ANF and BNP modulate proliferation in the unidirectional mixed lymphocyte reaction

BACKGROUND

Previous investigations have shown that the plasma levels of the cardiac hormone brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) increase during acute cardiac allograft rejection as diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy. Successful immunosuppressant treatment decreased plasma BNP levels, suggesting a role for BNP in transplantation immunity. We tested a possible immunomodulatory effect of the natriuretic peptides (NPs) BNP, atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), and C-type NP (CNP) using the unidirectional mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR).

METHODS

Lymphocytes were isolated from the lymph nodes of Brown Norway (BN) and Lewis (L) rats. BN lymphocytes were gamma-irradiated to inhibit DNA synthesis. Lymphocytes at 2.5 x 10(6) cell/ml were mixed (at an L:BN ratio of 4:1) and incubated. On Days 2 and 3, ANF (10(-6) to 10(-11) mol/liter), BNP (10(-5) to 10(-11) mol/liter), or CNP (10(-6) to 10(-12) mol/liter) were added. Cell proliferation was measured on Day 4.

RESULTS

Reverse transcript-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of BN and L lymphocytes detected NP receptor (NPR) mRNA amplicons of the expected size. MLR induced an increase in relative receptor abundance as follows: NPRA > NPRB > NPRC. ANF and BNP significantly inhibited up to approximately 50% lymphocyte proliferation in a dose-dependent manner in the range of 10(-11) to 10(-6) mol/liter, whereas CNP significantly decreased lymphocyte proliferation only modestly (approximately 20%) at 10(-8) mol/liter and at 10(-6) mol/liter.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ANF and BNP have immunomodulatory functions, although the response to cardiac rejection observed clinically involves increases in plasma levels of BNP only. This is likely related to BNP gene promoter sequences previously reported to be responsive to specific cytokines and related substances. The modulation of the MLR by NP suggests a possible clinical use of these peptides in transplantation immunity.

Time-dependent changes in B-type natriuretic peptide after heart transplantation: correlation with allograft rejection and function

Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard to diagnose cardiac allograft rejection, although a noninvasive modality such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is attractive. The authors examined the correlation of BNP levels with rejection patterns and allograft function in cardiac allograft recipients followed up to 8 years. One hundred forty-four consecutive patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy, right heart catheterization, and blood sampling. BNP levels decreased during the first 6 months after transplant but then reached a plateau. Time-dependent correlations were made between BNP levels and allograft rejection, left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, right atrial pressure, and serum creatinine. BNP levels were not different between patients with any rejection pattern and no rejection prior to or after 6 months following transplant. BNP levels did not correlate with ejection fraction, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, right atrial pressure, or creatinine in the first 6 months after transplant. Statistically significant correlations existed between BNP and these parameters after 6 months following transplant. In cardiac transplant recipients, BNP levels decrease in the first 6 months following transplant and then reach a plateau regardless of the presence, type, or severity of allograft rejection. BNP levels do predict allograft rejection but correlate with allograft function after 6 months following transplant.

BNP directly immunoregulates the innate immune system of cardiac transplant recipients in vitro

BACKGROUND

The innate immune system plays an important role in cardiac allograft rejection. BNP has frequently been reported to elevate during acute cardiac rejection, yet the explanation behind this phenomenon is unclear. We hypothesized that BNP might interact with the innate immune system in cardiac transplant recipients and devised a series of in vitro culture experiments to explore this phenomena.

METHODS

PBMCs were isolated from whole blood of (total n = 40) cardiac transplant recipients. Short (24h, n = 20) and long term (72h, n = 20) co-cultures of innate cells in the presence or absence of BNP were performed. BNP was added at two specific concentrations and compared to placebo control. Innate cells were immunophenotyped using flow cytometry.

RESULTS

BNP dose dependently reduced the total number of monocytes, B cells and NK cells. Furthermore, BNP co-culture impaired NK cell cytotoxicity and adhesion of non-classical monocytes (via down-regulation of CD11c).

DISCUSSION

BNP has an additional physiological role of moderating components of the innate immune system. Although speculative, this could be beneficial to cardiac transplant recipients as the innate immune system is involved in allograft rejection. Further investigation is required to elucidate the mechanism behind how BNP affects immune cells and whether the same effects are consistent with the adaptive immune system.

Screening for rejection in symptomatic pediatric heart transplant recipients: the sensitivity of BNP

As the pediatric OHT population expands, there is increasing demand for convenient, yet sensitive screening techniques to identify children with acute rejection when they present to acute care facilities. In children, symptoms of acute rejection or other causes of graft dysfunction are often non-specific and can mimic other childhood illnesses. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of BNP as a biomarker to assist providers in clinical decision-making when evaluating symptomatic pediatric heart transplant patients. One hundred twenty-two urgent care and emergency room visits from 53 symptomatic pediatric OHT patients were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the relationship between BNP levels, symptoms, and clinical diagnosis at these visits. An ROC curve was generated to determine the accuracy of BNP as a screening tool for acute rejection in this patient population. In this group of patients, a BNP value of >700 pg/mL was 100% sensitive and 92% specific for detecting allograft acute rejection (NPV of 100%). We concluded that BNP is a highly sensitive screening test for acute rejection in symptomatic pediatric heart transplant patients.

Does circulating BNP normalize after heart transplantation in patients with normal hemodynamic and right and left heart functions?

BACKGROUND

Increased brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in cardiovascular disease is thought to be a compensatory protective mechanism allowing to delay the occurrence of terminal heart failure. Heart transplantation should normalize the neuroendocrine balance but BNP remains elevated in stable heart-transplant recipients (Htx). Such increase has been related to persistent endothelial and cardiac dysfunctions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether selected Htx, presenting with normal hemodynamic and cardiac systolic and diastolic functions on both side of the heart, show a normalization of their BNP plasma values.

METHODS

Of a cohort of well-being 26 Htx, we selected 12 patients with normal hemodynamics and left and right heart systolic and diastolic functions and compared their circulating BNP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) (the BNP second messenger) and endothelin-1 (ET) values with that of 12 age-, body mass index- and mean arterial pressure-matched controls. Cardiac function determination by echodoppler included cardiac filling pressures assessment using tissue Doppler imaging. Blood samples for biological and hormonal determinations were drawn at rest, within 15 min before echocardiography.

RESULTS

As selected, hemodynamic and left and right heart systolic and diastolic functions were located in the normal range in Htx. Plasma ET value was also similar in Htx and controls (20.7 +/- 0.9 vs. 19.6 +/- 0.9 fmol/mL). However, circulating BNP, like cGMP, was still significantly increased after heart transplantation, when compared with controls (33.8 +/- 8.5 vs. 4.0 +/- 0.9 pg/mL, p = 0.002 and 8.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 4.4 +/- 0.3 nmol/L, p = 0.003) for BNP and cGMP, respectively, in Htx and controls. Interestingly, the sole correlation observed was between BNP and cGMP (r = 0.85, p < 0.0001) after heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

After heart transplantation, BNP remained increased despite the normalization of hemodynamic and cardiac systolic and diastolic functions. This suggests that such endocrine heart stimulation should not be viewed only as a hemodynamic marker in Htx. Further studies will be useful to investigate the role of pro-inflammatory cytokines and whether elevated BNP still possesses antifibrotic properties, further supporting the interest of enhancing its activity after heart transplantation.

The first year post-heart transplantation: use of immunosuppressive drugs and early complications

A large number of heart transplants are performed annually in different transplant centers in the United States. This is partly because of the improved survival of patients who undergo cardiac transplantation, thus making it a more viable option in the management of end-stage heart failure. The survival benefit after heart transplantation is a result of newer immunosuppressive drug regimens and a better understanding of their effects and interactions. Several studies, mostly involving a small number of patients, describe use and comparison of the many distinct immunosuppressive drugs available to date. Interestingly, many transplant centers perform in-house typical induction treatment regimens because of their own experience and intra-institutional preference. This review summarizes current practices of immunosuppressive drug therapy in the first year post-heart transplant based on the available clinical evidence and discusses future options of heart transplant immunosuppressive drug therapies.

Gene Expression Profiles and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Elevation in Heart Transplantation

Background— B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is chronically elevated in heart transplantation and reflects diastolic dysfunction, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and poor late outcome. This investigation studied peripheral gene expression signatures of elevated BNP concentrations in clinically quiescent heart transplant recipients in an effort to elucidate molecular correlates beyond hemodynamic perturbations.

Methods and Results— We performed gene microarray analysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 28 heart transplant recipients with clinical quiescence (absence of dyspnea or fatigue; normal left ventricular ejection fraction [EF >55%]; ISHLT biopsy score 0 or 1A; and normal hemodynamics [RAP <7 mm Hg, PCWP ≤15 mm Hg, and CI ≥2.5 L/min per m 2 ]). BNP levels were performed using the Triage B-type Natriuretic Peptide test (Biosite Diagnostics Inc, San Diego, Calif) and median BNP concentration was 165 pg/mL. Seventy-eight probes (of 7370) mapped to 54 unique genes were significantly correlated with BNP concentrations ( P <0.001). Of these, the strongest correlated genes ( P <0.0001) were in the domains of gelsolin (actin cytoskeleton), matrix metallopeptidases (collagen degradation), platelet function, and immune activity (human leukocyte antigen system, heat shock protein, mast cell, and B-cell lineage).

Conclusions— In the clinically quiescent heart transplant recipient, an elevated BNP concentration is associated with molecular patterns that point to ongoing active cardiac structural remodeling, vascular injury, inflammation, and alloimmune processes. Thus, these findings allude to the notion that BNP elevation is not merely a hemodynamic marker but should be considered reflective of integrated processes that determine the balance between active cardiac allograft injury and repair.

Usefulness of N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels in predicting survival in heart transplant recipients

We evaluated the prognostic value of plasma N-terminal-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) in 71 transplanted heart recipients during a 38 +/- 2 month follow-up. The negative predictive value of NT-pro-BNP levels </=800 pg/ml to predict death was 97% (95% confidence interval 92 to 100). Thus, NT-pro-BNP levels </=800 pg/ml predict a middle-term good survival in transplanted heart recipients.