Allogeneic marrow transplantation in children with acute leukemia: careful comparison with chemotherapy alternatives required

Prednisolone poor response is not an indication for HSCT in pediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission: results from JACLS ALL-02 study

Approximately 90% of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cases are curable with intensified chemotherapy, but very high-risk patients may require hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A suitable indication for HSCT in the first complete remission (CR1) should be defined to protect patients from long-term complications. We report the outcomes of HSCT in CR1 from the Japan Association of Childhood Leukemia Study (JACLS) ALL-02 study and reassess indications for HSCT. Of 1114 patients, 71 (6.4%) received HSCT in CR1. Indications included high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and non-CR on day 33. Patients with B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL and a prednisolone poor response (PPR) received HSCT when leukocyte antigen-matched siblings were available. The 4-year overall survival (OS) of transplanted patients was 78.8% (confidence interval 67.3-86.6). Multivariate analysis revealed that cord blood transplantation was associated with poor OS. For BCP-ALL patients with PPR who achieved CR1 after induction therapy, HSCT in CR1 showed excellent outcomes (4-year OS 90.9%) but demonstrated no survival advantage as the outcome with chemotherapy was also excellent (4-year OS 97.0%). This study suggests that in BCP-ALL patients PPR is not an indication for HSCT in CR1. Precise evaluation of treatment responses would increase sophistication of indications for HSCT in CR1.

Beyond CD19: Opportunities for Future Development of Targeted Immunotherapy in Pediatric Relapsed-Refractory Acute Leukemia

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has been used as a targeted approach in cancer therapy. Relapsed and refractory acute leukemia in pediatrics has been difficult to treat with conventional therapy due to dose-limiting toxicities. With the recent success of CD 19 CAR in pediatric patients with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), this mode of therapy has become a very attractive option for these patients with high-risk disease. In this review, we will discuss current treatment paradigms of pediatric acute leukemia and potential therapeutic targets for additional high-risk populations, including T cell ALL, AML, and infant ALL.

Access to allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients with MDS or relapsed AML treated according to protocols of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group

To investigate whether all patients in need of an allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) are offered one, we retrospectively investigated the policy for all children diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome (n=90) or relapsed AML (n=75) between 1998 and 2008. These children are registered at diagnosis and treated according to protocols of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group, which provides accurate disease incidence data and protocol-indicated appropriateness for HSCT. For 48 (30%) patients, a family donor was identified; for 90 (57%) patients, an unrelated donor (UD) search was performed; and for 21 (13%) patients, no UD search was initiated. Reasons for not initiating an UD search include: progressive disease (n=10), conserve quality of life (n=1), stable disease (n=3), immunosuppressive therapy (n=2), patient death (n=3), patient lives abroad (n=1) and second relapse (n=1). On the basis of the time interval between date of diagnosis and date of death/last follow-up, for eight (5%) patients, it may be questioned why an UD search was not performed. The fact that 95% of all children are given the option of an allogeneic HSCT is encouraging and reasons not to transplant seem fair in most cases.

High-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: to transplant or not to transplant?

Because survival with both chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) approaches to high-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) generally improves through the years, regular comparisons of outcomes with either approach for a given indication are needed to decide when HSCT is indicated. Improvements in risk classification are allowing clinicians to identify patients at high risk for relapse early in their course of therapy. Whether patients defined as high risk by new methods will benefit from HSCT requires careful testing. Standardization and improvement of transplant approaches has led to equivalent survival outcomes with matched sibling and well-matched unrelated donors; however, survival using mismatched and haploidentical donors is generally worse. Trials comparing chemotherapy and HSCT must obtain sufficient data about therapy and stratify the analysis to assess the outcomes of best-chemotherapy with best-HSCT approaches.