Improved flow cytometric detection of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The Evolving Landscape of Flowcytometric Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring in B-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major independent prognostic marker in the clinical management of pediatric and adult B-cell precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (BCP-ALL), and risk stratification nowadays heavily relies on MRD diagnostics. MRD can be detected using flow cytometry based on aberrant expression of markers (antigens) during malignant B-cell maturation. Recent advances highlight the significance of novel markers (e.g., CD58, CD81, CD304, CD73, CD66c, and CD123), improving MRD identification. Second and next-generation flow cytometry, such as the EuroFlow consortium's eight-color protocol, can achieve sensitivities down to 10-5 (comparable with the PCR-based method) if sufficient cells are acquired. The introduction of targeted therapies (especially those targeting CD19, such as blinatumomab or CAR-T19) introduces several challenges for flow cytometric MRD analysis, such as the occurrence of CD19-negative relapses. Therefore, innovative flow cytometry panels, including alternative B-cell markers (e.g., CD22 and CD24), have been designed. (Semi-)automated MRD assessment, employing machine learning algorithms and clustering tools, shows promise but does not yet allow robust and sensitive automated analysis of MRD. Future directions involve integrating artificial intelligence, further automation, and exploring multicolor spectral flow cytometry to standardize MRD assessment and enhance diagnostic and prognostic robustness of MRD diagnostics in BCP-ALL.

Association of Minimal Residual Disease by a Single-Tube 8-Color Flow Cytometric Analysis With Clinical Outcome in Adult B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Real-World Study Based on 486 Patients

CONTEXT.—

Minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) measured by molecular and multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) has been proven to be predictive of relapse and survival in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). A universally applicable antibody panel at a low cost but without compromising sensitivity and power of prognosis prediction in adult B-ALL remains unestablished.

OBJECTIVE.—

To report our experience of using a single-tube 8-color MFC panel to measure the MRD status as a prognostic indicator in adult B-ALL patients.

DESIGN.—

We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics, MRD status, and prognosis of adult B-ALL based on a large real-world cohort of 486 patients during a 10-year period.

RESULTS.—

MRD assessed by MFC and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for BCR-ABL+ patients showed concordant results in 74.2% of cases. MRD- status by our MFC panel could clearly predict a favorable relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) both at the end of induction and at the end of 1 consolidation course. Patients with continuous MRD- and with at least 1 MRD- result showed a favorable RFS and OS compared with those with at least 1 MRD+ result and continuous MRD+, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The single-tube 8-color MFC panel demonstrated a low cost, decent sensitivity, and comparability with polymerase chain reaction-MRD but an excellent performance in predicting RFS and OS, and thus could potentially be taken as a routine indicator in the evaluation of the treatment response for adult patients with B-ALL.

Highly sensitive single tube B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma minimal/measurable residual disease test robust to surface antigen directed therapy

BACKGROUND

Measurement of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) in B-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (B-ALL) has become a routine clinical evaluation tool and remains the strongest predictor of treatment outcome. In recent years, new targeted anti-CD19 and anti-CD22 antibody-based and cellular therapies have revolutionized the treatment of the high-risk B-ALL. The new treatments raise challenges for diagnostic flow cytometry, which relies on the presence of specific surface antigens to identify the population of interest. So far, reported flow cytometry-based assays are developed to either achieve a deeper MRD level or to accommodate the loss of surface antigens post-target therapies, but not both.

METHODS

We developed a single tube flow cytometry assay (14-color-16-parameters). The method was validated using 94 clinical samples as well as spike-in and replicate experiments.

RESULTS

The assay was well suited for monitoring response to targeted therapies and reached a sensitivity below 10-5 with acceptable precision (coefficient of variation < 20%), accuracy, and interobserver variability (κ = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The assay allows for sensitive disease detection of B-ALL MRD independent of CD19 and CD22 expression and allows uniform analysis of samples regardless of anti-CD19 and CD22 therapy.

Which one is better for refractory/relapsed acute B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia: Single-target (CD19) or dual-target (tandem or sequential CD19/CD22) CAR T-cell therapy?

CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown great success against B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Tandem and sequential CD19/CD22 dual-target CAR T-cell therapies have been developed to reduce the possibility of CD19-negative relapse; however, the superior strategy is still uncertain. This study screened 219 patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL who were enrolled in clinical trials of either CD19 (NCT03919240) or CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy (NCT03614858). The complete remission (CR) rates in the single CD19, tandem CD19/CD22, and sequential CD19/CD22 groups were 83.0% (122/147), 98.0% (50/51), and 95.2% (20/21), respectively (single CD19 vs. tandem CD19/CD22, P = 0.006). Patients with high-risk factors achieved a higher rate of CR in the tandem CD19/CD22 group than in the single CD19 group (100.0% vs. 82.4%, P = 0.017). Tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy was one of the significant favorable factors in the multivariate analysis of the CR rate. The incidence of adverse events was similar among the three groups. Multivariable analysis in CR patients showed that a low frequency of relapse, a low tumor burden, minimal residual disease-negative CR and bridging to transplantation were independently associated with better leukemia-free survival. Our findings suggested that tandem CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy obtains a better response than CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and a similar response to sequential CD19/CD22 CAR T-cell therapy.

Minimal residual disease detection by mutation-specific droplet digital PCR for leukemia/lymphoma

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is usually defined as the small number of cancer cells that remain in the body after treatment. The clinical significance of MRD kinetics is well recognized in treatment of hematologic malignancies, particularly acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Real time quantitative PCR targeting immunoglobulin (Ig) or T-cell receptor (TCR) rearrangement (PCR-MRD), as well as multiparametric flow cytometric analysis targeting antigen expression, are widely used in MRD detection. In this study, we devised an alternative method to detect MRD using droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), targeting somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs). This ddPCR-based method (ddPCR-MRD) had sensitivity up to 1E-4. We assessed ddPCR-MRD at 26 time points from eight T-ALL patients, and compared it to the results of PCR-MRD. Almost all results were concordant between the two methods, but ddPCR-MRD detected micro-residual disease that was missed by PCR-MRD in one patient. We also measured MRD in stored ovarian tissue of four pediatric cancer patients, and detected 1E-2 of submicroscopic infiltration. Considering the universality of ddPCR-MRD, the methods can be used as a complement for not only ALL, but also other malignant diseases regardless of tumor-specific Ig/TCR or surface antigen patterns.

Immunophenotypic measurable residual disease monitoring in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers a survival benefit to adult patients affected by acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, to avoid an overt disease relapse, patients with pre or post transplant persistence or occurrence of measurable residual disease (MRD) may require cellular or pharmacological interventions with eventual side effects. While the significance of multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) in the guidance of ALL treatment in both adult and pediatric patients is undebated, fewer data are available regarding the impact of MRD monitoring, as assessed by MFC analysis, in the allo-HSCT settings. Aim of this article is to summarize and discuss currently available information on the role of MFC detection of MRD in adult ALL patients undergoing allo-HSCT. The significance of MFC-based MRD according to sensitivity level, timing, and in relation to molecular techniques of MRD and chimerism assessment will be also discussed.

High frequency of heat shock protein 27 overexpression is a highly effective, high-coverage marker for minimal residual disease detection in children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric cancer. Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection is the most powerful prognostic tool for monitoring treatment efficacy and predicting clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify key leukemia-associated markers, the proportions of differential expression in patients, and the most effective marker combination for MRD detection by flow cytometry.

METHODS

Bone marrow samples were collected from 132 pediatric patients with newly diagnosed (n = 115) or relapsed (n = 17) B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL. We used CD19, CD10, CD34, CD45 as backbone markers to identify immature B cells and analyzed the differential expression of 18 leukemia-associated markers using seven-color multiparameter flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Leukemic cells in all 132 patients expressed leukemia-associated markers. The most commonly overexpressed marker was heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) (108 patients, 81%), followed by CD73 (102 patients, 77%) and CD123 (80 patients, 60%). CD38 was underexpressed in 64 patients (48%). Hsp27 overexpression persisted in 50 out of 57 follow-up MRD bone marrow samples (87%) and was associated with older age at diagnosis. Hsp27 overexpression was not associated with MRD levels or genetic abnormalities including hyperdiploidy, t(12;21)/ETV6-RUNX1, t(1;19)/TCF3-PBX1, t(9;22)/BCR-ABL1, or 11q23/KMT2A rearrangements. Four remaining leukemia-associated markers (Hsp27, CD73, CD58, CD24) after in silico deletion from the original panel could collectively detect leukemia-associated cell profiles in 100% of cases in this cohort and 98% of cases in a validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Hsp27 combined with CD73, CD58, CD24, and backbone markers allows monitoring MRD in virtually all patients with BCP-ALL.

Theranostic Potentials of Gold Nanomaterials in Hematological Malignancies

Simple Summary

Hematological malignancies (HMs) cover 50% of all malignancies, and people of all ages can be affected by these deadly diseases. In many cases, conventional diagnostic tools fail to diagnose HMs at an early stage, due to heterogeneity and the long-term indolent phase of HMs. Therefore, many patients start their treatment at the late stage of HMs and have poor survival. Gold nanomaterials (GNMs) have shown promise as a cancer theranostic agent. GNMs are 1 nm to 100 nm materials having magnetic resonance and surface-plasmon-resonance properties. GNMs conjugated with antibodies, nucleic acids, peptides, photosensitizers, chemotherapeutic drugs, synthetic-drug candidates, bioactive compounds, and other theranostic biomolecules may enhance the efficacy and efficiency of both traditional and advanced theranostic approaches to combat HMs.

Abstract

Hematological malignancies (HMs) are a heterogeneous group of blood neoplasia generally characterized by abnormal blood-cell production. Detection of HMs-specific molecular biomarkers (e.g., surface antigens, nucleic acid, and proteomic biomarkers) is crucial in determining clinical states and monitoring disease progression. Early diagnosis of HMs, followed by an effective treatment, can remarkably extend overall survival of patients. However, traditional and advanced HMs’ diagnostic strategies still lack selectivity and sensitivity. More importantly, commercially available chemotherapeutic drugs are losing their efficacy due to adverse effects, and many patients develop resistance against these drugs. To overcome these limitations, the development of novel potent and reliable theranostic agents is urgently needed to diagnose and combat HMs at an early stage. Recently, gold nanomaterials (GNMs) have shown promise in the diagnosis and treatment of HMs. Magnetic resonance and the surface-plasmon-resonance properties of GNMs have made them a suitable candidate in the diagnosis of HMs via magnetic-resonance imaging and colorimetric or electrochemical sensing of cancer-specific biomarkers. Furthermore, GNMs-based photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, radiation therapy, and targeted drug delivery enhanced the selectivity and efficacy of anticancer drugs or drug candidates. Therefore, surface-tuned GNMs could be used as sensitive, reliable, and accurate early HMs, metastatic HMs, and MRD-detection tools, as well as selective, potent anticancer agents. However, GNMs may induce endothelial leakage to exacerbate cancer metastasis. Studies using clinical patient samples, patient-derived HMs models, or healthy-animal models could give a precise idea about their theranostic potential as well as biocompatibility. The present review will investigate the theranostic potential of vectorized GNMs in HMs and future challenges before clinical theranostic applications in HMs.

Droplet Digital PCR: A New View on Minimal Residual Disease Quantification in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor gene rearrangements has been used as the gold standard for minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for >20 years. Recently, new PCR-based technologies have emerged, such as droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), which could offer several methodologic advances for MRD monitoring. In the current work, qPCR and ddPCR were compared in an unbiased blinded prospective study (n = 88 measurements) and in a retrospective study with selected critical low positive samples (n = 65 measurements). The former included flow cytometry (Flow; n = 31 measurements) as a third MRD detection method. Published guidelines (qPCR) and the latest, revised evaluation criteria (ie, ddPCR, Flow) have been applied for data analysis. The prospective study shows that ddPCR outperforms qPCR with a significantly better quantitative limit of detection and sensitivity. The number of critical MRD estimates below quantitative limit was reduced by sixfold and by threefold in the retrospective and prospective cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the concordance of quantitative values between ddPCR and Flow was higher than between ddPCR and qPCR, probably because ddPCR and Flow are absolute quantification methods independent of the diagnostic sample, unlike qPCR. In summary, our data highlight the advantages of ddPCR as a more precise and sensitive technology that could be used to refine response monitoring in ALL.

Experience of the Spanish Group for Hematopoietic Transplantation (GETMON-GETH) in allogenic Hematopoietic stem cell Transplantation in Philadelphia acute lymphoblastic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

Outcomes in patients diagnosed of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph-ALL) remains unfavourable compared to other subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia despite improvements in drug treatments as well as advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The role of allogeneic HSCT in Ph-ALL patients has been analysed through a multicentric study where data belonging to 70 patients diagnosed of this entity in different centers that received HSCT between years 1998 and 2014, were reported by the Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético (GETH).

RESULTS

The performance of HSCT from year 2004, in first complete remission (CR) status with thymoglobulin (ATG) based conditioning had a favorable impact on overall survival (OS). HSTC performance from year 2004, in first CR with ATG-based conditioning in addition to acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) development, increased event free survival (EFS). Treatment with imatinib as well as undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) prior to HSCT, combined with aGvHD, reduced risk of relapse (RR). Patient age less than 10 years when HSCT, first CR and ATG-based conditioning were associated to a lower transplant related mortality (TRM).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients that could achieve first CR that also received ATG-based conditioning had a better OS and EFS, so HSCT should be considered for this group of patients.

Comparison of minimal residual disease measurement by multicolour flow cytometry and PCR for fusion gene transcripts in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with KMT2A gene rearrangements

This study aimed to evaluate the concordance between minimal residual disease (MRD) results obtained by multicolour flow cytometry (MFC) and polymerase chain reaction for fusion gene transcripts (FGTs) in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) associated with rearrangement of the KMT2A gene (KMT2A-r). A total of 942 bone marrow (BM) samples from 123 infants were studied for MFC-MRD and FGT-MRD. In total, 383 samples (40.7%) were concordantly MRD-negative. MRD was detected by the two methods in 441 cases (46.8%); 99 samples (10.5%) were only FGT-MRD-positive and 19 (2.0%) were only MFC-MRD-positive. A final concordance rate of 87.4% was established. Most discordance occurred if residual leukaemia was present at levels close to the sensitivity limits. Neither the type of KMT2A fusion nor a new type of treatment hampering MFC methodology had an influence on the concordance rate. The prognostic value of MFC-MRD and FGT-MRD differed. MFC-MRD was able to identify a rapid response at early time-points, whereas FGT-MRD was a reliable relapse predictor at later treatment stages. Additionally, the most precise risk definition was obtained when combining the two methods. Because of the high comparability in results, these two rather simple and inexpensive approaches could be good options of high clinical value.

How I Use Measurable Residual Disease in the Clinical Management of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Over the last decade the use of measurable residual disease (MRD) diagnostics in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has expanded from a limited number of study groups in Europe and the United States to a world-wide application. In this review, we summarize the advantages and drawbacks of the current available techniques used for MRD monitoring. Through the use of three representative case studies, we highlight the advances in the use of MRD in clinical decision-making in the management of ALL in adults. We acknowledge discrepancies in MRD monitoring and treatment between different countries, reflecting differing availability, accessibility and affordability.

Clofarabine added to intensive treatment in adult patients with newly diagnosed ALL: the HOVON-100 trial

Clofarabine (CLO) is a nucleoside analogue with efficacy in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This randomized phase III study aimed to evaluate whether CLO added to induction and consolidation would improve outcome in adults with newly diagnosed ALL. Treatment for younger (18-40 years) patients consisted of a pediatric inspired protocol and for older patients (41-70 years) of a semi-intensive protocol was used. 340 patients were randomized. After a median follow up of 70 months, 5-year EFS was 50% and 53% for arm A and B (CLO arm). For patients ≤40 years, EFS was 58% vs 65% in arm A vs B, while in patients >40 years EFS was 43% in both arms. CR rate was 89% in both arms and similar in younger and older patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in 200 patients (60%). Fifty-four of 76 evaluable patients (71%) were MRD negative after consolidation 1 in arm A vs 75/81 (93%) in arm B (p=0.001). Seventy (42%) patients proceeded to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in both arms. Five years OS was similar in both arms, 60% vs 61%. Among patients achieving CR, relapse rates were 28% and 24%, and non-relapse mortality was 16% vs 17% after CR. CLO treated patients experienced more serious adverse events, more infections, and more often went off-protocol. This was most pronounced in older patients. We conclude that, despite a higher rate of MRD-negativity, addition of CLO does not improve outcome in adults with ALL, which might be due to increased toxicity. The trial is registered at www.trialregister.nl as NTR2004.

An Extensive Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC/QA) Program Significantly Improves Inter-Laboratory Concordance Rates of Flow-Cytometric Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: An I-BFM-FLOW-Network Report

Simple Summary

Standardization of flow-cytometric assessment of minimal residual disease in acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) is necessary to allow concordant multicentric application of the methodology. This is a prerequisite for internationally collaborative trials, such as the AIEOP-BFM-ALL and the ALL IC-BFM trial. We developed and applied a comprehensive training and quality control program involving a large number of international laboratories within the I-BFM consortium to complement standardization of the methodology with an educational component as well as with persistent quality control measures to allow large ALL treatment trials which use multi-laboratory FCM-MRD assessments for risk stratification of pediatric patients with ALL.

Abstract

Monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry (FCM) is a powerful prognostic tool for predicting outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). To apply FCM-MRD in large, collaborative trials, dedicated laboratory staff must be educated to concordantly high levels of expertise and their performance quality should be continuously monitored. We sought to install a unique and comprehensive training and quality control (QC) program involving a large number of reference laboratories within the international Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (I-BFM) consortium, in order to complement the standardization of the methodology with an educational component and persistent quality control measures. Our QC and quality assurance (QA) program is based on four major cornerstones: (i) a twinning maturation program, (ii) obligatory participation in external QA programs (spiked sample send around, United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Service (UK NEQAS)), (iii) regular participation in list-mode-data (LMD) file ring trials (FCM data file send arounds), and (iv) surveys of independent data derived from trial results. We demonstrate that the training of laboratories using experienced twinning partners, along with continuous educational feedback significantly improves the performance of laboratories in detecting and quantifying MRD in pediatric ALL patients. Overall, our extensive education and quality control program improved inter-laboratory concordance rates of FCM-MRD assessments and ultimately led to a very high conformity of risk estimates in independent patient cohorts.

Application of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Mutational Profiling in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent efforts to characterize hematologic cancers with genetic and molecular detail have largely relied on mutational profiling via next-generation sequencing (NGS). The application of NGS-guided disease prognostication and clinical decision making requires a basic understanding of sequencing advantages, pitfalls, and areas where clinical care might be enhanced by the knowledge generated. This article identifies avenues within the landscape of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) where mutational data hold the opportunity to enhance understanding of disease biology and patient care.

RECENT FINDINGS

NGS-based assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) after ALL treatment allows for a sensitive and specific molecular survey that is at least comparable, if not superior, to existing techniques. Mutational assessment by NGS has unraveled complex signaling networks that drive pathogenesis of T-cell ALL. Sequencing of patients with familial clustering of ALL has also identified novel germline mutations whose inheritance predisposes to disease development in successive generations. While NGS-based assessment of hematopoietic malignancies often provides actionable information to clinicians, patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia are left underserved due to a lack of disease classification and prognostication schema that integrate molecular data. Ongoing research is positioned to enrich the molecular toolbox available to clinicians caring for adult ALL patients and deliver new insights to guide therapeutic selection, monitor clinical response, and detect relapse.

Targeting pediatric leukemia-propagating cells with anti-CD200 antibody therapy

Treating refractory pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains a challenge despite impressive remission rates (>90%) achieved in the last decade. The use of innovative immunotherapeutic approaches such as anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells does not ensure durable remissions, because leukemia-propagating cells (LPCs) that lack expression of CD19 can cause relapse, which signifies the need to identify new markers of ALL. Here we investigated expression of CD58, CD97, and CD200, which were previously shown to be overexpressed in B-cell precursor ALL (BCP-ALL) in CD34+/CD19+, CD34+/CD19-, CD34-/CD19+, and CD34-/CD19- LPCs, to assess their potential as therapeutic targets. Whole-genome microarray and flow cytometric analyses showed significant overexpression of these molecules compared with normal controls. CD58 and CD97 were mainly co-expressed with CD19 and were not a prerequisite for leukemia engraftment in immune deficient mice. In contrast, expression of CD200 was essential for engraftment and serial transplantation of cells in measurable residual disease (MRD) low-risk patients. Moreover, these CD200+ LPCs could be targeted by using the monoclonal antibody TTI-CD200 in vitro and in vivo. Treating mice with established disease significantly reduced disease burden and extended survival. These findings demonstrate that CD200 could be an attractive target for treating low-risk ALL, with minimal off-tumor effects that beset current immunotherapeutic approaches.

Minimal residual disease, long-term outcome, and IKZF1 deletions in children and adolescents with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia: a matched cohort study

Background

Patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia are at an increased risk of treatment-related mortality and relapse, which is influenced by unfavourable genetic aberrations (eg, IKZF1 deletion). We aimed to investigate the potential underlying effect of Down syndrome versus the effects of adverse cancer genetics on clinical outcome.

Method

Patients (aged 1–23 years) with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia and matched non-Down syndrome patients with acute lymphocytic leukaemia (matched controls) from eight trials (DCOG ALL10 and ALL11, ANZCHOG ALL8, AIEOP-BFM ALL2009, UKALL2003, NOPHO ALL2008, CoALL 07-03, and CoALL 08-09) done between 2002 and 2018 across various countries (the Netherlands, the UK, Australia, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and Germany) were included. Participants were matched (1:3) for clinical risk factors and genetics, including IKZF1 deletion. The primary endpoint was the comparison of MRD levels (absolute MRD levels were categorised into two groups, low [<0·0001] and high [≥0·0001]) between patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia and matched controls, and the secondary outcomes were comparison of long-term outcomes (event-free survival, overall survival, relapse, and treatment-related mortality [TRM]) between patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia and matched controls. Two matched cohorts were formed: for MRD analyses and for long-term outcome analyses. For both cohorts, matching was based on induction regimen; for the long-term outcome cohort, matching also included MRD-guided treatment group. We used mixed-effect models, Cox models, and competing risk for statistical analyses.

Findings

Of 251 children and adolescents with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia, 136 were eligible for analyses and matched to 407 (of 8426) non-Down syndrome patients with acute lymphocytic leukaemia (matched controls). 113 patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia were excluded from matching in accordance with predefined rules, no match was available for two patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia. The proportion of patients with high MRD at the end of induction treatment was similar for patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia (52 [38%] of 136) and matched controls (157 [39%] of 403; OR 0·97 [95% CI 0·64–1·46]; p=0·88). Patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia had a higher relapse risk than did matched controls in the IKZF1 deleted group (relapse at 5 years 37·1% [17·1–57·2] vs 13·2% [6·1–23·1]; cause-specific hazard ratio [HR_cs] 4·3 [1·6–11·0]; p=0·0028), but not in the IKZF1 wild-type group (relapse at 5 years 5·8% [2·1–12·2] vs 8·1% [5·1–12·0]; HR_cs 1·0 [0·5–2·1]; p=0·99). In addition to increased induction deaths (15 [6%] of 251 vs 69 [0·8%] of 8426), Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia was associated with a higher risk of post-induction TRM compared with matched controls (TRM at 5 years 12·2% [7·0–18·9] vs 2·7% [1·3–4·9]; HR_cs 5·0 [2·3–10·8]; p<0·0001).

Interpretation

Induction treatment is equivalently effective for patients with Down syndrome and acute lymphocytic leukaemia and for matched patients without Down syndrome. Down syndrome itself provides an additional risk in individuals with IKZF1 deletions, suggesting an interplay between the germline environment and this poor risk somatic aberration. Different treatment strategies are warranted considering both inherent risk of relapse and high risk of TRM.

Funding

Stichting Kinder Oncologisch Centrum Rotterdam and the Princess Máxima Center Foundation, NHMRC Australia, The Cancer Council NSW, Tour de Cure, Blood Cancer UK, UK Medical Research Council, Children with Cancer, Swedish Society for Pediatric Cancer, Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund, Danish Cancer Society and the Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation.

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry for MRD Monitoring in Hematologic Malignancies: Clinical Applications and New Challenges

Simple Summary

In hematologic cancers, Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) monitoring, using either molecular (PCR) or immunophenotypic (MFC) diagnostics, allows the identification of rare cancer cells, readily detectable either in the bone marrow or in the peripheral blood at very low levels, far below the limit of classic microscopy. In this paper, we outlined the state-of-the-art of MFC-based MRD detection in different hematologic settings, highlighting main recommendations and new challenges for using such method in patients with acute leukemias or chronic hematologic neoplasms. The combination of new molecular technologies with advanced flow cytometry is progressively allowing clinicians to design a personalized therapeutic path, proportionate to the biological aggressiveness of the disease, in particular by using novel immunotherapies, in view of a modern decision-making process, based on precision medicine.

Abstract

Along with the evolution of immunophenotypic and molecular diagnostics, the assessment of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) has progressively become a keystone in the clinical management of hematologic malignancies, enabling valuable post-therapy risk stratifications and guiding risk-adapted therapeutic approaches. However, specific prognostic values of MRD in different hematological settings, as well as its appropriate clinical uses (basically, when to measure it and how to deal with different MRD levels), still need further investigations, aiming to improve standardization and harmonization of MRD monitoring protocols and MRD-driven therapeutic strategies. Currently, MRD measurement in hematological neoplasms with bone marrow involvement is based on advanced highly sensitive methods, able to detect either specific genetic abnormalities (by PCR-based techniques and next-generation sequencing) or tumor-associated immunophenotypic profiles (by multiparametric flow cytometry, MFC). In this review, we focus on the growing clinical role for MFC-MRD diagnostics in hematological malignancies—from acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemias (AML, B-ALL and T-ALL) to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and multiple myeloma (MM)—providing a comparative overview on technical aspects, clinical implications, advantages and pitfalls of MFC-MRD monitoring in different clinical settings.

Critical evaluation of the utility of pre- and post-therapy immunophenotypes in assessment of measurable residual disease in B-ALL

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important parameter to predict outcome in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). Two different approaches have been used for the assessment of MRD by multiparametric flow cytometry that include the "Leukemia Associated Aberrant Immunophenotype (LAIP)" and "Difference from Normal (DFN)" approach. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 539 samples obtained from 281 patients of which 258 were paired samples and the remaining 23 samples were from post-induction time point only, to explore the utility of baseline immunophenotype (IPT) for MRD assessment. Single-tube 10-color panel was used both at diagnosis and MRD time points. Out of 281 patients, 31.67% (n = 89) were positive and 68.32% (n = 192) were negative for MRD. Among 258 paired diagnostic and follow-up samples, baseline IPT was required in only 9.31% (24/258) cases which included cases with hematogone pattern and isolated dim to negative CD10 expression patterns. Comparison of baseline IPT with post-induction MRD positive samples showed a change in expression of at least one antigen in 94.04% cases. Although the immunophenotypic change in expression of various antigens is frequent in post-induction samples of B-ALL, it does not adversely impact the MRD assessment. In conclusion, the baseline IPT is required in less than 10% of B-ALL, specifically those with hematogone pattern and/or dim to negative expression of CD10. Hence, a combination of DFN and LAIP approach is recommended for reliable MRD assessment.

[Experience of the Spanish Group for Hematopoietic Transplantation (GETMON-GETH) in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Philadelphia acute lymphoblastic leukemia]

INTRODUCTION

Outcomes in patients diagnosed of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph-ALL) remains unfavourable compared to other subtypes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia despite improvements in drug treatments as well as advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The role of allogeneic HSCT in Ph-ALL patients has been analysed through a multicentric study where data belonging to 70 patients diagnosed of this entity in different center that received HSCT between years 1998 and 2014, were reported by the Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético (GETH).

RESULTS

The performance of HSCT from year 2004, in first complete remission (CR) status with thymoglobulin (ATG) based conditioning had a favorable impact on overall survival (OS). HSTC performance from year 2004, in first CR with ATG-based conditioning in addition to acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) development, increased event free survival (EFS). Treatment with imatinib as well as undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) prior to HSCT, combined with aGvHD, reduced risk of relapse (RR). Patient age less than 10 years when HSCT, first CR and ATG-based conditioning were associated to a lower transplant related mortality (TRM).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients that could achieve first CR that also received ATG-based conditioning had a better OS and EFS, so HSCT should be considered for this group of patients.

Minimal residual disease level determined by flow cytometry provides reliable risk stratification in adults with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important independent prognostic factor for relapse and survival in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Compared with adult B-cell ALL, reports of adult T-cell ALL (T-ALL) MRD have been scarce and mostly based on molecular methods. We evaluated the prognostic value of multiparameter flow cytometry (FCM)-based MRD at the end of induction (EOI-MRD). The present retrospective study included 94 adult patients with T-ALL. MRD was detected by six- to eight-colour FCM. Patients who were EOI-MRD positive had a higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (87·6% vs. 38·8%, P = 0·0020), and a lower relapse-free survival (RFS) (5·4% vs. 61·0%, P = 0·0005) and overall survival (OS) (32·7% vs. 69·7%, P < 0·0001) than those who were EOI-MRD negative. Moreover, for patients who received allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at their first remission, EOI-MRD positivity was predictive of post-transplant relapse (2-year CIR: 68·2% vs. 4·0%, P = 0·0003). Multivariate analysis showed that EOI-MRD was an independent prognostic factor for CIR [hazard ratio (HR) 2·139, P = 0·046], RFS (HR 2·125, P = 0·048) and OS (HR 2·987, P = 0·017). In conclusion, EOI-MRD based on FCM was an independent prognostic factor for relapse and survival in adult T-ALL. For patients who underwent HSCT, EOI-MRD could be used to identify patients with a high risk of relapse after allo-HSCT.

Early T-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and T/Myeloid Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia Possess Overlapping Characteristics and Both Benefit From CAG-Like Regimens and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) and T-lymphoid/myeloid mixed phenotype acute leukemia (T/M-MPAL) are closely related entities and remain a therapeutic challenge. In this study, we characterized the clinical features of 43 ETP-ALL and 41 T/M-MPAL patients and compared clinical outcomes and safety between cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (CAG)-like regimens in 34 patients and conventional ALL regimens in 50 patients. In our series, ETP-ALL and T/M-MPAL showed similar biological characteristics, immunophenotypes, genomic alterations, and outcomes. The complete remission (CR) rate and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative CR rate of CAG-like regimens were significantly higher compared with conventional ALL regimens (CAG-like: 80.0% and 59.7%, respectively; P = .039; ALL: 51.4% and 31.3%, respectively; P = .048). Overall, 90.0% of cases (18/20) achieved CR using combined decitabine and CAG-like regimens. Additionally, CAG-like regimens had lower rates of grade 3 or 4 infection (18.8% vs. 38.2%; P = .059) and grade 1 or 2 hepatotoxicity (37.5% vs. 60.0%; P = .043) than conventional ALL regimens. The 38 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the first CR (CR1) had better overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) than the 11 patients who underwent allo-HSCT in the second CR (CR2) or in no remission (median OS not reached vs. 7.6 months, P = .0004; median LFS not reached vs. 11.6 months, P = .0008). There was a significant difference in 3-year OS (95.7% vs. 52.5%; P = .0039) and LFS (95.8% vs. 43.5%; P = .0003) after allo-HSCT between pre-transplant MRD-negative and MRD-positive patients. The median OS for patients without allo-HSCT was 32.1 months in the CAG-like group compared with 12.1 months in the non-CAG-like group (P = .019). These findings suggest that ETP-ALL and T/M-MPAL possess overlapping characteristics and CAG-like regimens improve their clinical outcomes.

Value of flow cytometry for MRD-based relapse prediction in B-cell precursor ALL in a multicenter setting

PCR of TCR/Ig gene rearrangements is considered the method of choice for minimal residual disease (MRD) quantification in BCP-ALL, but flow cytometry analysis of leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (FCM-MRD) is faster and biologically more informative. FCM-MRD performed in 18 laboratories across seven countries was used for risk stratification of 1487 patients with BCP-ALL enrolled in the NOPHO ALL2008 protocol. When no informative FCM-marker was available, risk stratification was based on real-time quantitative PCR. An informative FCM-marker was found in 96.2% and only two patients (0.14%) had non-informative FCM and non-informative PCR-markers. The overall 5-year event-free survival was 86.1% with a cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR_5y) of 9.5%. FCM-MRD levels on days 15 (HzR 4.0, p < 0.0001), 29 (HzR 2.7, p < 0.0001), and 79 (HzR 3.5, p < 0.0001) associated with hazard of relapse adjusted for age, cytogenetics, and WBC. The early (day 15) response associated with CIR_5y adjusted for day 29 FCM-MRD, with higher levels in adults (median 2.4 × 10⁻² versus 5.2 × 10⁻³, p < 0.0001). Undetectable FCM- and/or PCR-MRD on day 29 identified patients with a very good outcome (CIR_5y = 3.2%). For patients who did not undergo transplantation, day 79 FCM-MRD > 10⁻⁴ associated with a CIR_5y = 22.1%. In conclusion, FCM-MRD performed in a multicenter setting is a clinically useful method for MRD-based treatment stratification in BCP-ALL.

Immunophenotypic shift in the B-cell precursors from regenerating bone marrow samples: A critical consideration for measurable residual disease assessment in B-lymphoblastic leukemia

Accurate knowledge of expression patterns/levels of commonly used MRD markers in regenerative normal-B-cell-precursors (BCP) is highly desirable to distinguish leukemic-blasts from regenerative-BCP for multicolor flow cytometry (MFC)-based measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, the data highlighting therapy-related immunophenotypic-shift in regenerative-BCPs is scarce and limited to small cohort. Herein, we report the in-depth evaluation of immunophenotypic shift in regenerative-BCPs from a large cohort of BALL-MRD samples. Ten-color MFC-MRD analysis was performed in pediatric-BALL at the end-of-induction (EOI), end-of-consolidation (EOC), and subsequent-follow-up (SFU) time-points. We studied normalized-mean fluorescent intensity (nMFI) and coefficient-of-variation of immunofluorescence (CVIF) of CD10, CD19, CD20, CD34, CD38, and CD45 expression in regenerative-BCP (early, BCP1 and late, BCP2) from 200 BALL-MRD samples, and compared them with BCP from 15 regenerating control (RC) TALL-MRD samples and 20 treatment-naïve bone-marrow control (TNSC) samples. Regenerative-BCP1 showed downregulation in CD10 and CD34 expression with increased CVIF and reduced nMFI (p < 0.001), upregulation of CD20 with increased nMFI (p = 0.014) and heterogeneous CD45 expression with increased CVIF (p < 0.001). Immunophenotypic shift was less pronounced in the BCP2 compared to BCP1 compartment with increased CVIF in all but CD45 (p < 0.05) and reduced nMFI only in CD45 expression (p = 0.005). Downregulation of CD10/CD34 and upregulation of CD20 was higher at EOI than EOC and SFU time-points (p < 0.001). Regenerative-BCPs are characterized by the significant immunophenotypic shift in commonly used B-ALL-MRD markers, especially CD10 and CD34 expression, as compared to treatment-naïve BCPs. Therefore, the templates/database for BMRD analysis must be developed using regenerative-BCP.

Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) refers to a chemotherapy/radiotherapy-surviving leukemia cell population that gives rise to relapse of the disease. The detection of MRD is critical for predicting the outcome and for selecting the intensity of further treatment strategies. The development of various new diagnostic platforms, including next-generation sequencing (NGS), has introduced significant advances in the sensitivity of MRD diagnostics. Here, we review current methods to diagnose MRD through phenotypic marker patterns or differential gene patterns through analysis by flow cytometry (FCM), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR), reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or NGS. Future advances in clinical procedures will be molded by practical feasibility and patient needs regarding greater diagnostic sensitivity.

Proteomic tools and new insights for the study of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) is a hematological malignancy of immature B-cell precursors, affecting children more often than adults. The etiology of BCP-ALL is still unknown, but environmental factors, sex, race or ethnicity, and genomic alterations influence the development of the disease. Tools based on protein detection, such as flow cytometry, mass spectrometry, mass cytometry and reverse phase protein array, represent an opportunity to investigate BCP-ALL pathogenesis and to identify new biomarkers of disease. This review aims to document the recent advancements with respect to applications of proteomic technologies to study mechanisms of leukemogenesis, how this information could be used in the discovery of biological targets, and finally we describe the challenges of application of proteomic tools for the approach of BCP-ALL.

Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Technical and Clinical Advances

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the first neoplasm where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has proven to be a fundamental tool to guide therapeutic choices. The most standardized methods to study MRD in ALL are multi-parametric flow cytometry (MFC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification-based methods. Emerging technologies hold the promise to improve MRD detection in ALL patients. Moreover, novel therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) represent exciting advancements in the management of B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL.

Aims: Through a review of the literature and in house data, we analyze the current status of MRD assessment in ALL to better understand how some of its limitations could be overcome by emerging molecular technologies. Furthermore, we highlight the future role of MRD monitoring in the context of personalized protocols, taking into account the genetic complexity in ALL.

Results and Conclusions: Molecular rearrangements (gene fusions and immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor-IG/TR gene rearrangements) are widely used as targets to detect residual leukemic cells in ALL patients. The advent of novel techniques, namely next generation flow cytometry (NGF), digital-droplet-PCR (ddPCR), and next generation sequencing (NGS) appear important tools to evaluate MRD in ALL, since they have the potential to overcome the limitations of standard approaches. It is likely that in the forthcoming future these techniques will be incorporated in clinical trials, at least at decisional time points. Finally, the advent of new powerful compounds is further increasing MRD negativity rates, with benefits in long-term survival and a potential reduction of therapy-related toxicities. However, the prognostic relevance in the setting of novel immunotherapies still needs to be evaluated.

Approach to the Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patient

During recent decades, understanding of the molecular mechanisms of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved considerably, resulting in better risk stratification of patients and increased survival rates. Age, white blood cell count (WBC), and specific genetic abnormalities are the most important factors that define risk groups for ALL. State-of-the-art diagnosis of ALL requires cytological and cytogenetical analyses, as well as flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing assays. An important aspect in the diagnostic characterization of patients with ALL is the identification of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, which warrants the addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) to the chemotherapy backbone. Data that support the benefit of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high risk patient subsets or in late relapse patients are still questioned and have yet to be determined conclusive. This article presents the newly published data in ALL workup and treatment, putting it into perspective for the attending physician in hematology and oncology.

Comparison between flow cytometry and standard PCR in the evaluation of MRD in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with the GBTLI LLA - 2009 protocol

Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring is of prognostic importance in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The detection of immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor gene rearrangements by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR) is considered the gold standard for this evaluation. However, more accessible methods also show satisfactory performance. This study aimed to compare MRD analysis by four-color flow cytometry (FC) and qualitative standard PCR on days 35 and 78 of chemotherapy and to correlate these data with patients' clinical characteristics. Forty-two children with a recent diagnosis of ALL, admitted to a public hospital in Brazil for treatment in accordance with the Brazilian Childhood Cooperative Group for ALL Treatment (GBTLI LLA-2009), were included. Bone marrow samples collected at diagnosis and on days 35 and 78 of treatment were analyzed for the immunophenotypic characterization of blasts by FC and for the detection of clonal rearrangements by standard PCR. Paired analyses were performed in 61/68 (89.7%) follow-up samples, with a general agreement of 88.5%. Disagreements were resolved by RT-PCR, which evidenced one false-negative and four false-positive results in FC, as well as two false-negative results in PCR. Among the prognostic factors, a significant association was found only between T-cell lineage and MRD by standard PCR. These results show that FC and standard PCR produce similar results in MRD detection of childhood ALL and that both methodologies may be useful in the monitoring of disease treatment, especially in regions with limited financial resources.

Next-Generation Sequencing in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common childhood cancer and accounts for about a quarter of adult acute leukemias, and features different outcomes depending on the age of onset. Improvements in ALL genomic analysis achieved thanks to the implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) have led to the recent discovery of several novel molecular entities and to a deeper understanding of the existing ones. The purpose of our review is to report the most recent discoveries obtained by NGS studies for ALL diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment planning. We also report the first efforts at NGS use for minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, and early studies on the application of third generation sequencing in cancer research. Lastly, we consider the need for the integration of NGS analyses in clinical practice for genomic patients profiling from the personalized medicine perspective.

Minimal residual disease quantification by flow cytometry provides reliable risk stratification in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Minimal residual disease (MRD) measured by PCR of clonal IgH/TCR rearrangements predicts relapse in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and serves as risk stratification tool. Since 10% of patients have no suitable PCR-marker, we evaluated flowcytometry (FCM)-based MRD for risk stratification. We included 274 T-ALL patients treated in the NOPHO-ALL2008 protocol. MRD was measured by six-color FCM and real-time quantitative PCR. Day 29 PCR-MRD (cut-off 10-3) was used for risk stratification. At diagnosis, 93% had an FCM-marker for MRD monitoring, 84% a PCR-marker, and 99.3% (272/274) had a marker when combining the two. Adjusted for age and WBC, the hazard ratio for relapse was 3.55 (95% CI 1.4-9.0, p = 0.008) for day 29 FCM-MRD ≥ 10-3 and 5.6 (95% CI 2.0-16, p = 0.001) for PCR-MRD ≥ 10-3 compared with MRD < 10-3. Patients stratified to intermediate-risk therapy on day 29 with MRD 10-4-<10-3 had a 5-year event-free survival similar to intermediate-risk patients with MRD < 10-4 or undetectable, regardless of method for monitoring. Patients with day 15 FCM-MRD < 10-4 had a cumulative incidence of relapse of 2.3% (95% CI 0-6.8, n = 59). Thus, FCM-MRD allows early identification of patients eligible for reduced intensity therapy, but this needs further studies. In conclusion, FCM-MRD provides reliable risk prediction for T-ALL and can be used for stratification when no PCR-marker is available.

Guidelines Insights: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Version 1.2019

Survival outcomes for older adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are poor and optimal management is challenging due to higher-risk leukemia genetics, comorbidities, and lower tolerance to intensive therapy. A critical understanding of these factors guides the selection of frontline therapies and subsequent treatment strategies. In addition, there have been recent developments in minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) testing and blinatumomab use in the context of MRD-positive disease after therapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for ALL regarding upfront therapy in older adults and MRD monitoring/testing in response to ALL treatment.

SERS-based dynamic monitoring of minimal residual disease markers with high sensitivity for clinical applications

Minimal residual disease (MRD) measurement is important for the diagnosis and prognosis of B cell hematological malignancies in the clinic. Thus, a sensitive and accurate method for monitoring the corresponding surface markers is in high demand for early diagnosis and treatment instruction. Herein, we developed a surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)-based sandwich-type immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of two surface markers (i.e., CD19 and CD20) in Raji cell lines as well as in clinical blood samples. First, to compare with the results obtained by flow cytometry, we evaluated the sensitivity and reproducibility of the SERS immunoassay for real-time detection of CD19 and CD20 expressions in Raji cells and blood samples. Then, we conducted follow-up tests on 13 B cell hematological malignancy patients for one month and dynamically monitored their CD19 and CD20 expressions by the SERS immunoassay. In addition to the improved sensitivity of the SERS method, good linear correlations between the SERS intensities and flow cytometry results were also observed for both CD19 and CD20, which indicated the accuracy of this SERS-based strategy. Therefore, this SERS-based simultaneous detection approach shows great potential for accurate and early diagnosis of MRD in B cell hematological malignancies.

Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Using an Eight-Color Tube with Dried Antibody Reagents

BACKGROUND

Flow cytometry is a powerful tool for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) of B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL) patients. However, the staining process and the choice of antibodies rely on laboratory expertise and may be source of variability or technical errors. Recently, Beckman Coulter commercialized a ready to use tube with dried format reagents for BCP-ALL MRD detection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the applicability of this tube and to compare it to a conventional (liquid format reagents) method.

METHODS

Thirty-one samples from B ALL patients were analyzed: 19 bone marrow (BM) aspirations, 10 peripheral blood (PB) samples and 2 cerebrospinal fluids at different stages of the follow-up. In addition, we tested 5 bone marrow samples mixed into non-pathological (control) bone marrow. The dried format tube included seven antibodies: CD45Kro, CD58FITC, CD34ECD, CD10PC5.5, CD19PC7, CD38AA700, CD20AA750, with possibility of additional antibodies for blast markers identified at diagnosis. For comparison, a liquid format tube was prepared, and considered as the reference.

RESULTS

This tube was validated for daily routine laboratory, with satisfying qualitative (MRD + or MRD-) and quantitative (MRD percentages) correlation with the reference tube.

CONCLUSION

With this single dried format tube, we showed interesting results for BCP-ALL MRD detection in the aim of standardization and reliable interlaboratory results. It allows accurate MRD detection including low levels (10-4), and offers possibility to increase performance (supplementary antibody) within a preestablished effective antibody panel for BCP-ALL MRD. © 2018 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Immunophenotypic measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia: Is multicentric MRD assessment feasible?

Flow-cytometric detection of now termed measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has proven to have an independent prognostic impact. In a previous multicenter study we developed protocols to accurately define leukemia-associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) at diagnosis. It has, however, not been demonstrated whether the use of the defined LAIPs in the same multicenter setting results in a high concordance between centers in MRD assessment. In the present paper we evaluated whether interpretation of list-mode data (LMD) files, obtained from MRD assessment of previously determined LAIPs during and after treatment, could reliably be performed in a multicenter setting. The percentage of MRD positive cells was simultaneously determined in totally 173 LMD files from 77 AML patients by six participating centers. The quantitative concordance between the six participating centers was meanly 84%, with slight variation of 75%-89%. In addition our data showed that the type and number of LAIPs were of influence on the performance outcome. The highest concordance was observed for LAIPs with cross-lineage expression, followed by LAIPs with an asynchronous antigen expression. Our results imply that immunophenotypic MRD assessment in AML will only be feasible when fully standardized methods are used for reliable multicenter assessment.

[Clinical application of minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute leukemia]

In recent years, great progress has been made in the treatment outcome of childhood acute leukemia with the improvement of chemotherapy regimens and the introduction of risk-stratified therapy; however, minimal residual disease (MRD) is still a difficult problem which affects the prognosis of acute leukemia. MRD influences the selection of chemotherapy regimens and recurrence risk stratification, and meanwhile, it can be used for prognostic prediction. At present, flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction are mainly used for MRD detection. The next-generation sequencing also plays an important role in MRD detection, especially in MRD detection after stem cell transplantation. This article reviews the methodology and significance of MRD detection in childhood acute leukemia.

Neuropilin-1/CD304 Expression by Flow Cytometry in Pediatric Precursor B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Minimal Residual Disease and Potential Prognostic Marker

Flow cytometry (FCM) is used for quantification of minimal residual disease (MRD) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) through discriminating leukemic B-lymphoblasts from normal B-cell precursor counterparts "hematogones." Neuropilin-1 (NRP-1)/CD304 is a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor implicated in the progression of hematological malignancies. We evaluated NRP-1/CD304 as MRD and prognostic marker in pediatric precursor B-ALL using FCM. Seventy children with precursor B-ALL and 40 control children were enrolled. CD304 percentage and fluorescence intensity were significantly higher in precursor B-ALL at diagnosis compared with controls. In total, 28 of 70 (40%) precursor B-ALL patients at diagnosis were CD304 (group A), whereas 42/70 (60%) patients were CD304 (group B). Group A showed higher incidence of lymphadenopathy and TEL-AML1 fusion gene than group B. CD304 was reevaluated in group A patients at day 28 postinduction chemotherapy which revealed 12/28 (42.9%) patients with persistent CD304 expression (MRD; group A1) and 16/28 (57.1%) patients who turned CD304 (MRD; group A2). At diagnosis, group A1 showed lower incidence of TEL-AML1 fusion gene and higher risk stratification than group A2. NRP-1/CD304 expression by FCM is efficient in discriminating leukemic B-lymphoblasts from hematogones, a stable leukemia-associated phenotype for MRD monitoring, and a putative poor prognostic marker in pediatric precursor B-ALL.

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Philadelphia-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the First Complete Remission in the Era of Minimal Residual Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for Philadelphia-negative (Ph^-) adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1) in the era of minimal residual disease (MRD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Allo-HSCT continues to have a role in the therapy of a selected group of high-risk adult patients with ALL in CR1. Although the clinical significance of MRD has been studied less extensively in adults with ALL than in children, recent studies support its role as the strongest prognostic factor that can identify patients that are unlikely to be cured by standard chemotherapy and benefit from undergoing allo-HSCT. In addition, MRD status both pre- and post-HSCT has been found to correlate directly with the risk of relapse. Currently, the clinical challenge consists on applying MRD and molecular failure to integrate novel agents and immunotherapy to lower MRD before allo-HSCT and to modulate the graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect after transplant.

Differential expression of CD73, CD86 and CD304 in normal vs. leukemic B-cell precursors and their utility as stable minimal residual disease markers in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Optimal discrimination between leukemic blasts and normal B-cell precursors (BCP) is critical for treatment monitoring in BCP acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); thus identification of markers differentially expressed on normal BCP and leukemic blasts is required.

METHODS

Multicenter analysis of CD73, CD86 and CD304 expression levels was performed in 282 pediatric BCP-ALL patients vs. normal bone marrow BCP, using normalized median fluorescence intensity (nMFI) values.

RESULTS

CD73 was expressed at abnormally higher levels (vs. pooled normal BCP) at diagnosis in 71/108 BCP-ALL patients (66%), whereas CD304 and CD86 in 119/202 (59%) and 58/100 (58%) patients, respectively. Expression of CD304 was detected at similar percentages in common-ALL and pre-B-ALL, while found at significantly lower frequencies in pro-B-ALL. A significant association (p = 0.009) was found between CD304 expression and the presence of the ETV6-RUNX1 fusion gene. In contrast, CD304 showed an inverse association with MLL gene rearrangements (p = 0.01). The expression levels of CD73, CD86 and CD304 at day 15 after starting therapy (MRD15) were stable or higher than at diagnosis in 35/37 (95%), 40/56 (71%) and 19/41 (46%) cases investigated, respectively. This was also associated with an increased mean nMFI at MRD15 vs. diagnosis of +24 and +3 nMFI units for CD73 and CD86, respectively. In addition, gain of expression of CD73 and CD86 at MRD15 for cases that were originally negative for these markers at diagnosis was observed in 16% and 18% of cases, respectively. Of note, CD304 remained aberrantly positive in 63% of patients, despite its levels of expression decreased at follow-up in 54% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Here we show that CD73, CD86 and CD304 are aberrantly (over)expressed in a substantial percentage of BCP-ALL patients and that their expression profile remains relatively stable early after starting therapy, supporting their potential contribution to improved MRD analysis by flow cytometry.

Minimal residual disease in adult ALL: technical aspects and implications for correct clinical interpretation

Nowadays, minimal residual disease (MRD) is accepted as the strongest independent prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It can be detected by molecular methods that use leukemia-specific or patient-specific molecular markers (fusion gene transcripts, or immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor [IG/TR] gene rearrangements), and by multi-parametric flow cytometry. The sensitivity and specificity of these methods can vary across treatment time points and therapeutic settings. Thus, knowledge of the principles and limitations of each technology is of the utmost importance for correct interpretation of MRD results. Time will tell whether new molecular and flow cytometric high-throughput technologies can overcome the limitations of current standard methods and eventually bring additional benefits. MRD during standard ALL chemotherapy is the strongest overall prognostic indicator and has therefore been used for refining initial treatment stratification. Moreover, MRD positivity after the maintenance phase of treatment may point to an impending relapse and thus enable salvage treatment to be initiated earlier, which could possibly improve treatment results. The prognostic relevance of pretransplantation MRD was shown by several studies, and MRD high-risk patients were shown to benefit from stem cell transplantation (SCT). Also, MRD positivity after SCT correlates with worse outcomes. In addition, MRD information is very instructive in current clinical trials that test novel agents to evaluate their treatment efficacy. Although conventional clinical risk factors lose their independent prognostic significance when combined with MRD information, recently identified genetic markers may further improve the treatment stratification in ALL.

Minimal residual disease in adult ALL: technical aspects and implications for correct clinical interpretation

Nowadays, minimal residual disease (MRD) is accepted as the strongest independent prognostic factor in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). It can be detected by molecular methods that use leukemia-specific or patient-specific molecular markers (fusion gene transcripts, or immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor [IG/TR] gene rearrangements), and by multi-parametric flow cytometry. The sensitivity and specificity of these methods can vary across treatment time points and therapeutic settings. Thus, knowledge of the principles and limitations of each technology is of the utmost importance for correct interpretation of MRD results. Time will tell whether new molecular and flow cytometric high-throughput technologies can overcome the limitations of current standard methods and eventually bring additional benefits. MRD during standard ALL chemotherapy is the strongest overall prognostic indicator and has therefore been used for refining initial treatment stratification. Moreover, MRD positivity after the maintenance phase of treatment may point to an impending relapse and thus enable salvage treatment to be initiated earlier, which could possibly improve treatment results. The prognostic relevance of pretransplantation MRD was shown by several studies, and MRD high-risk patients were shown to benefit from stem cell transplantation (SCT). Also, MRD positivity after SCT correlates with worse outcomes. In addition, MRD information is very instructive in current clinical trials that test novel agents to evaluate their treatment efficacy. Although conventional clinical risk factors lose their independent prognostic significance when combined with MRD information, recently identified genetic markers may further improve the treatment stratification in ALL.

Redefining treatment failure for pediatric acute leukemia in the era of minimal residual disease testing

Technologies for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in leukemia and our understanding of the prognostic implications of MRD at different phases of treatment have significantly improved over the past decade. As a result, definitions of treatment failure based on bone marrow morphology by light microscopy are becoming increasingly inadequate for clinical care and trial design. In addition, novel therapies that may have increased efficacy and decreased toxicity in the setting of MRD compared to overt disease are changing clinical practice and challenging investigators to redefine treatment failure, the role of disease surveillance in remission, and clinical trial eligibility in the era of MRD.