Equivalence of BCSH and WHO diagnostic criteria for ET

Variability of bone marrow biopsy reporting affects accuracy of diagnosis of myeloproliferative neoplasms: data from the ALLG MPN01 registry

The Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of overlapping bone marrow disorders defined by characteristic peripheral blood counts and bone marrow morphological findings in conjunction with recurrent somatic mutations. The accurate diagnosis and subclassification of MPN relies upon careful reporting of bone marrow morphology combined with ancillary information in an integrated pathology report. This co-operative trial group study ALLG MPN01 (ANZCTR:12613000138785), led by the Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group (ALLG), aimed to describe the current approach to diagnosis of MPN in routine practice. Specifically, we assessed the frequency with which bone marrow biopsies were performed, and the adherence of reporting pathologists to recommendations contained in the revised 2016 WHO classification pertaining to MPN. We reviewed the diagnosis of 152 patients from eight institutions who were enrolled in a national MPN registry of the ALLG between 2010 and 2016. The ALLG MPN01 registry is now closed to recruitment. Key features were extracted from pathology reports provided to the registry. Bone marrow biopsies were performed in 112/152 cases (74%). The pathological information entered was concordant with the stated clinical diagnosis in 75/112 cases (67%). The main reasons for discordant results were incomplete descriptions of megakaryocyte topography and morphology, inconsistent grading of reticulin fibrosis, and failure to integrate the available morphological and ancillary clinicopathological information. In this retrospective audit, 26% of MPN patients did not undergo a diagnostic bone marrow biopsy. In those who did, the specific MPN subtype may not have been reported correctly in 33% of cases, as evidenced by inconsistent features reported or insufficient information to assess. A more standardised approach to bone marrow reporting is required to ensure accuracy of MPN diagnoses and consistent reporting to cancer registries and clinical trials.

The 2014 BCSH criteria and the 2016 WHO criteria for essential thrombocythemia: A comparison in a large-scale cohort

OBJECTIVE

There are currently 2 representative diagnostic criteria for essential thrombocythemia (ET), the 2014 British Committee for Standards in Hematology Guidelines (BCSH) criteria and the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. We compare and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 criteria.

METHOD

We applied the 2 criteria to 403 patients with thrombocytosis and suspected myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and compared patient populations.

RESULTS

The BCSH criteria diagnosed ET in 279 patients (BCSH-ET) whereas the WHO criteria diagnosed ET in 203 patients (WHO-ET). There were 83 patients diagnosable only by the BCSH criteria (BCSH-only-ET), of which under the WHO classification, 69 patients fell under the category of MPN, unclassifiable (MPN-u), 12 patients were PMF, prefibrotic/early stage (pre-PMF), and 2 patients were polycythemia vera. Patient characteristics such as age, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet counts, lactate dehydrogenase levels, JAK2V617F allele burdens, prevalence of myelofibrosis and splenomegaly, and frequencies of thrombotic events and treatment did not differ between WHO-ET and BCSH-only-ET, but BCSH-only-ET patients showed higher WBC counts and higher JAK2V617F mutation frequencies.

CONCLUSION

The BCSH criteria diagnosed ET in a broader range of patients encompassing a significant number of patients who would otherwise be diagnosed as pre-PMF or MPN-u.